From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 00:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010045.m910jmbQ006151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-09-30 20:45:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Yes, since the configure script distributed with GROMACS is so old that it > > uses rpath. Works fine on F9 and RHEL5. > > You still need to make it build on F-10. There are other ways of avoiding > rpaths that don't involve re-running autoconf. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath. In fact, > adding those two sed lines mentioned there before each make call in %build > seems to solve the problem without rebuilding configure. If you insist on > rebuilding it, then at least add BR: libtool and run "autoreconf -f -i -I .". > That solves the problem as well. Of course, I prefer the solution which doesn't > involve running autoreconf. I tried this before, but it didn't work. Seems to work now. Good. Still couldn't get rid of the ldconfig errors. gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmd_mpi_d.so.4.0.0 gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libmd_mpi.so.4.0.0 gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libgmx_mpi.so.4.0.0 gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: postun-without-ldconfig /usr/lib64/libgmx_mpi_d.so.4.0.0 gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings. > > Made packages gromacs-bash, -zsh and -csh. > > I still think bash-completion-gromacs is a better name for the package, but I > won't insist on it. I can't find any packages beginning with bash-completion in Fedora 9 repos. IMHO it's better to keep the same base name. > %{_datadir}/gromacs/tutor/gmxdemo/demo > %{_datadir}/gromacs/tutor/gmxdemo/demo_d > > These two scripts drag /bin/csh dependency into -common as well. If they aren't > necessary to run gromacs, the please remove the #!/bin/csh lines from them. Branched to -tutor package. > OK. If you say there's runtime CPU capabilities detection and that it will run > on a machine without SSE and 3DNow! then I'll take your word for it. I can't > find any information on that on GROMACS website though, so I'd feel more > comfortable if you could confirm it with upstream. Made a question about it to the mailing list. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-5.rc2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 00:49:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213662] Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010049.m910nee6006785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213662 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-09-30 20:49:38 EDT --- But then *why* is it so slow to execute? Even on a shining new system it takes about a second to start an MPI job, whereas without IB sniffing it's as fast as executing a "normal" binary.. Could openmpi be branched into IB and non-IB versions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 01:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010134.m911Yfre014960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john.e.anderson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from John Anderson 2008-09-30 21:34:40 EDT --- I'm looking for sponsorship as well, so I can't do a full review, but I'd like to point out a few things. 1) It would be nice if you could link directly to the source. I notice http://www.gnome-look.org/CONTENT/content-files/56438-Aurora-1.4.tar.bz2 seems to work for the main source file. 2) Add a -q to your %setup 3) The permissions in source1 are kind of screwy. You can fix them in the files section with something like this: %attr(755, -, root) %{_datadir}/themes/* %attr(644, -, root) /usr/share/themes/Aurora-Midnight/gtk-2.0/gtkrc %attr(644, -, root) /usr/share/themes/Aurora/gtk-2.0/gtkrc %attr(644, -, root) /usr/share/themes/Aurora-looks/gtk-2.0/gtkrc Otherwise, it looks good to me. It builds and installs fine against rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 03:24:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213662] Review Request: openmpi - Upstream MPI package with native InfiniBand support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010324.m913O2oh003243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213662 --- Comment #6 from Doug Ledford 2008-09-30 23:24:01 EDT --- The old, closed, no longer needed package review request is not the right place to discuss issues with existing packages. If your package has a problem, then you need to file a bug. That being said, your report is currently useless. I don't know what package you are talking about "sniffing" infiniband, but the Fedora package of openmpi-1.2.4-2.fc9 (latest built) does *not* include infiniband support. Secondly, the openmpi package does not "sniff" infiniband *anyway*. It uses infiniband if you pass the option -mca btl openib,self. But, as I said, the fedora package isn't even built with infinband support so the openib module doesn't exist. I don't know what's wrong in your setup, but if you are using the fedora openmpi package, then it isn't "infiniband sniffing". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 04:21:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010421.m914LfXe014675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-01 00:21:40 EDT --- I verified that there is a valid reason to put the py* files inside %{_libdir} and make the package arch-specific. (See http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/PythonPluginHowTo ) Can you fix the other issues and update the package? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 04:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464805] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010437.m914bgkT017693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464805 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 00:37:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=853576 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 81bdb8563e1890466da842fe5e17d9cd hunspell-mi-0.1.20080630-beta.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 04:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464802] Review Request: hunspell-fur - Friulian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010441.m914f0nE018475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464802 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 00:40:59 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=853578 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 807bbcfd755d8160a0418d814361e88b myspell-fur-12092005.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 04:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 00:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010451.m914pI1D020558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 00:51:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=853580 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 49e592658529af2c9b67a24b817453da frysk_wurdboek-2.0.0-fx+tb+sm.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions:- I am not sure about license of this package. Also not sure how to read this language/convert to English. Link given in fy.dic points to LGPLv3+ but in fy.dic it stated only as LGPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010635.m916ZWoD009493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:35:31 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: uriparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010632.m916WiIF008341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:32:43 EDT --- uriparser-0.7.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:34:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010634.m916YRSJ008865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:34:26 EDT --- coredumper-1.2.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:35:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010635.m916ZMr4009436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:35:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010635.m916ZCAO009283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:35:11 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-5.102bzr.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gwibber'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010633.m916XkVL008674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:33:45 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-peak-util-assembler python-peak-util-extremes python-peak-util-addons python-peak-rules python-peak-util-symbols'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010633.m916XnaM008726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:33:48 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-peak-util-assembler python-peak-util-extremes python-peak-util-addons python-peak-rules python-peak-util-symbols'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:33:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010633.m916XUeC008732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:33:29 EDT --- txt2rss-0.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:35:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445153] Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010635.m916ZHNH009392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:35:15 EDT --- libacpi-0.2-12.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010636.m916aJXA009654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:33:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010633.m916Xw3X008866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:33:57 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-peak-util-assembler python-peak-util-extremes python-peak-util-addons python-peak-rules python-peak-util-symbols'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010633.m916XtsY008833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:33:54 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-peak-util-assembler python-peak-util-extremes python-peak-util-addons python-peak-rules python-peak-util-symbols'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8369 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010637.m916bJsv010074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #58 from Ken Crandall 2008-10-01 02:37:14 EDT --- The latest NetworkManager broke it. The applet won't even load on FC9 or FC8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461054] Review Request: qrq - Morse telegraphy trainer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010639.m916du2Q010818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461054 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:39:55 EDT --- qrq-0.1.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461054] Review Request: qrq - Morse telegraphy trainer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010640.m916eMvn011328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461054 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:40:22 EDT --- qrq-0.1.4-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:39:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459148] Review Request: txt2rss - Convert from txt to rss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010639.m916dSkM010746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459148 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:39:28 EDT --- txt2rss-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454120] Review Request: vdr-streamdev - Streaming client/server package for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010638.m916cmCu010547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454120 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:38:47 EDT --- vdr-streamdev-0.3.4-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010639.m916dFba010682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:39:14 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-5.102bzr.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gwibber'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445152] Review Request: yacpi - ncurses based acpi viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010636.m916aGge009838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445152 Bug 445152 depends on bug 445153, which changed state. Bug 445153 Summary: Review Request: libacpi - General purpose library for ACPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445153 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:36:14 EDT --- yacpi-3.0.1-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010639.m916d4lJ010597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:39:03 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ksplice'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:38:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:38:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458939] Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010638.m916cKOd010411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:38:19 EDT --- arora-0.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:41:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458939] Review Request: arora - a cross platform web browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010641.m916fBXv011489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458939 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:41:10 EDT --- arora-0.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438750] Review Request: qtoctave - fronted for octave written using qt4 widgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010640.m916eftg011193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438750 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:40:40 EDT --- qtoctave-0.8.1-0.20080823.svn165.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:38:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454120] Review Request: vdr-streamdev - Streaming client/server package for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010638.m916cpSu010522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454120 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010640.m916eq8q011301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:40:52 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ksplice'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010640.m916e3C7011089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:40:02 EDT --- pypop-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pypop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8487 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:43:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448201] Review Request: pyvnc2swf - Vnc screen recorder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010643.m916h7ak012411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448201 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:43:06 EDT --- pyvnc2swf-0.9.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458548] Review Request: uriparser - URI parsing library - RFC 3986 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010643.m916hvEX012495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458548 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:43:56 EDT --- uriparser-0.7.1-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454120] Review Request: vdr-streamdev - Streaming client/server package for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010641.m916flvB012057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454120 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:41:46 EDT --- vdr-streamdev-0.3.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:42:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458204] Review Request: coredumper - Library to help applications create core dumps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010642.m916geSZ012283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458204 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:42:40 EDT --- coredumper-1.2.1-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:41:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010641.m916fVEc011670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 02:41:31 EDT --- pypop-0.7.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pypop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:50:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464805] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010650.m916oA4o014068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464805 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-01 02:50:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mi Short Description: Maori hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 06:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 02:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464802] Review Request: hunspell-fur - Friulian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010652.m916q0ju014437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464802 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-01 02:51:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-fur Short Description: Friulian hunpspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:26:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010726.m917QLZo021781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 03:26:20 EDT --- as this is python package, you should also look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010741.m917fQE2024537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-01 03:41:25 EDT --- I tried to follow our own documents on this, i.e. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Frequently_Asked_Questions "1. What does the code say? If it specifies a version, that's what it is." and it doesn't :-) "2. Does the code conflict with itself? (file1.c and file2.c are compiled together but have different licensing)" nope "3. What does the documentation say? ... NOTE: COPYING does not count as documentation, since the author(s) didn't write it" Just a link in this case to the GNU LGPL page, which always has the latest version available on it. "4. If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll guess COPYING is accurate. " and from the other page we have... "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under in the source code/program output/accompanying docs is technically licensed under *any* version of the GPL or LGPL, not just the version in whatever COPYING file they include. Note that this is LGPLv2+, not LGPL+, because version 2 was the first version of LGPL." So I followed the logic of 4. and that other snippet of "it is under any LGPL license because it the source and documentation don't specify an exact LGPL version" which gave me a output tag of "LGPLv2+ " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010746.m917kBK4025523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 03:46:09 EDT --- I see empty build section in spec. your %build should be %{__python} setup.py build and %files section should be like this %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{python_sitelib}/* Also, update SPEC with how to create tarball from upstream site. I see you included wrong URL to svn checkout in spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 07:49:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 03:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010749.m917nnvT026404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-01 03:49:48 EDT --- Ok. Thanks. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 08:04:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 04:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810010804.m9184evR030018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-01 04:04:39 EDT --- New package: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin-0.1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Licence: the code says "version 2 or or (at your option) any later version.". See for example Logger.py or graphics/GraphicsDialog.py. What it's true is that some files doesn't mention any license at all (GraphicsSourceBuilder.py). I think the license is GPL2v+ The rest of the issues are fixed. rpmlint still gives two errors, but I think they can be ignored in our case gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: no-binary gedit-latex-plugin.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 10:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 06:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011003.m91A3uHw027099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-01 06:03:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-fy Short Description: Frisian hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 10:14:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 06:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011014.m91AEdJx029226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-01 06:14:38 EDT --- Got a reply on the runtime CPU capabilities detection: "Yes it does. It should work, but e.g. debuggers tend to dislike illegal instructions (when e.g. testing for 3DNow on a pentium)." Should I make additional debug packages that have all assembly instructions disabled? This would mean 6 additional packages: gromacs-debug, gromacs-debug-libs, gromacs-debug-devel, gromacs-debug-mpi, gromacs-debug-mpi-libs, gromacs-debug-mpi-devel ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 11:38:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 07:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011138.m91Bc803015530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-01 07:38:07 EDT --- Thanks Dave, This package is approved. Please correct the following warning before importing: python-rdflib.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line 20) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 13:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011320.m91DKi0L006269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 09:20:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Got a reply on the runtime CPU capabilities detection: > > "Yes it does. It should work, but e.g. debuggers tend to dislike illegal > instructions (when e.g. testing for 3DNow on a pentium)." > > Should I make additional debug packages that have all assembly instructions > disabled? This would mean 6 additional packages: gromacs-debug, > gromacs-debug-libs, gromacs-debug-devel, gromacs-debug-mpi, > gromacs-debug-mpi-libs, gromacs-debug-mpi-devel ... Well, that's up to you. If you think most users of your package will be using it on machines with 3DNow and/or SSE, then I wouldn't bother. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 13:41:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011341.m91DfJv6011243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Novotny 2008-10-01 09:41:17 EDT --- hello, now built the srpm on F9, updated to 2.6.0p2 new things discovered: * you need another BuildRequires dependency "perl-ExtUtils-Embed" without it you'll get compilation errors about missing header files * the perl patch seems to be already upstreamed (complains about duplicit patching) so I removed it * in the %files section one library name is "libamglue.so" and not "libamglue.so.*" (dot and number not used this time, I wonder why...) all probably new stuff in 2.6.0p2 or F9... http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/amanda.spec Orion, what do you think about it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 14:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011404.m91E44vX017677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 --- Comment #3 from Rajiv Andrade 2008-10-01 10:04:03 EDT --- Hi David, I can't see you subscription request to trousers-tech neither a post from you awaiting approval, did I miss something? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 14:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] New: Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 Summary: Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://thincrust.org OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dhuff at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora David Huff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec URL: http://huff.fedorapeople.org/appliance-os.spec SRPM URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=850473&name=appliance-os-001-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Appliance Operating System (AOS) is minimal version of Fedora or RHEL which additional software can be added. The AOS is described by a kickstart file which is provided by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 14:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011447.m91ElHPm029274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-01 10:47:16 EDT --- Well, in fact it was a question, so This doesn't looks like a package, but rather a spin? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:03:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011503.m91F36WY001347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-01 11:03:04 EDT --- Hi lemenkov, you may like to have you look here, when free :-) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011504.m91F4YsE031193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 Neil Horman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #22 from Neil Horman 2008-10-01 11:04:33 EDT --- I've heard from the upstream maintainer, who posted a new version with GPLv3 license langage. I've got a package put together here: SPEC: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda.spec SRPM: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda-0.5-1.fc8.src.rpm Clearing legal blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 14:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011446.m91EkU8U027026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-01 10:46:29 EDT --- This doesn't looks like a package, but rather a spin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011513.m91FD7eN003723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-01 11:13:06 EDT --- The source still says GPLv2, as does COPYING. Changlog in source says GPLv3, though that's a start. Upstream may want to correct. pam_kcoda.i386: E: library-not-linked-against-libc /lib/security/pam_kcoda.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:11:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011511.m91FBlpO003556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 David Huff changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bkearney at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from David Huff 2008-10-01 11:11:46 EDT --- So we have requested a spin for this, however we are also following the livecd-tools model of separating the kickstart files form the tools, in a separate package as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011533.m91FXamQ006489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 --- Comment #4 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-01 11:33:35 EDT --- I've just tried again, at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/subscribe/trousers-tech I haven't tried posting there, but I did post to trousers-users on the 25th of September, subject 'TPM support in my application'. That doesn't appear in the archives either (but if you find it, don't bother; I have patches for most of it now). Would you like to own the openssl-tpm-engine package? I could only be a package-monkey for it, not a real maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:46:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011546.m91FkOwY012422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-01 11:46:23 EDT --- Still here ) Sorry for the delay - I'll review it ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011547.m91FlDAC012583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 11:47:12 EDT --- Shouldn't these projectM review tickets have some dependencies between them? It doesn't seem possible to review projectM-jack without first having at least libprojectM-qt in the distribution first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 15:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011552.m91Fq8gq014346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2008-10-01 11:52:06 EDT --- We have our spin kickstart files in the spins-kickstart module - is there a reason it needs a separate one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:02:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011602.m91G2CeB014451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #24 from Neil Horman 2008-10-01 12:02:11 EDT --- upstream noticed at the same time you did. New package w/ fixed licensing, and corrected linkage. SPEC: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda.spec SRPM: http://nhorman.fedorapeople.org/pam_kcoda-0.5.1-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:13:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454687] Review Request: perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl extension for the clamav virus scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011613.m91GDYqv019570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454687 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 12:13:33 EDT --- Any response to my review commentary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011611.m91GBcfe016668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 12:11:36 EDT --- So, what's going on here? The spec is still there but the SRPM isn't, and there's the open question of using the system libev. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011616.m91GGTwe020481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 12:16:28 EDT --- This doesn't seem to have been built yet. Any reason for not doing that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011619.m91GJVwQ020974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 12:19:30 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459218] Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011620.m91GKcVi018713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kushaldas at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 12:20:37 EDT --- Anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011624.m91GOq9X022366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-01 12:24:51 EDT --- I haven't received any email from upstream. Again i don't want to block this review... What can we do ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:24:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441141] Review Request: antlr3 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011624.m91GOM76019437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441141 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011622.m91GMl0s019194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-01 12:22:46 EDT --- Don't know why srpm isn't there anymore. This bug depend on libev review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 16:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 12:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011631.m91GVapb024642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-01 12:31:33 EDT --- That, my friend, is hysterical. :) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:00:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011700.m91H0aEQ032462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-01 13:00:35 EDT --- Thanks for the update and for filing those bug reports. Please keep track of them and update your package in the future. The package is in pretty good shape but yet I have two issues. 1) The debuginfo guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo say that one can disable the debuginfo package if it does not contain arch-specific files but the package itself is not noarch because of the installation path it uses. As for now the debuginfo package is empty and there is no need to ship it. Please disable it and put a comment in the spec file. 2) The naming of the package kind-of bugs me. There is already a gedit-plugins package which is the official plugins package. The website of gedit also has links to 3rd party plugins ( http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Plugins ) and the LaTeX plugin is one of the 3rd party plugins. A quick "yum search plugin" showed me there are both foo-plugin-bar foo-bar-plugin types of plugin packages in Fedora. But since there already is a gedit-plugins package should we consider to have this package as gedit-plugin-latex or gedit-plugin-LaTeX ; OR if you want to keep the original name for the plugin how about gedit-LaTeXPlugin? The documentation gives you some freedom for this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 I leave this up to you but my vote would be for gedit-LaTeXPlugin . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:09:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011709.m91H9W23031605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-10-01 13:09:31 EDT --- Not a good one. :-) Just had to redo a few certs to get communication to CVS and koji working again properly. All is well now and am doing the build(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:11:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011711.m91HBR6i003372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|458660 | Depends on| |458660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011711.m91HBQn6003340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |458661 Depends on|458661 | --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 13:11:24 EDT --- Is there an updated package for review? I'll go ahead and fix up the dependencies so that this ticket shows up in the review queue and Graph::Easy::As_svg depends on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:15:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011715.m91HFHvZ000739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-01 13:15:15 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, we're fine to go forward with GPLv3+ here. When upstream resolves their issues, please correct the license tag accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011745.m91HjSpW011124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-01 13:45:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319139) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319139) crash log when tuxguitar exits For 1.0-5: * Requires - I guess at least "Requires: libswt3-gtk2" is missing. * Using build-classpath - For example -------------------------------------------------------- make SWT_JAR=%{_libdir}/java/swt.jar CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -I%{openjdkdir}/include -I%{openjdkdir}/include/linux -fPIC" -------------------------------------------------------- I guess using -------------------------------------------------------- make SWT_JAR=$(build-classpath swt) CFLAGS=..... -------------------------------------------------------- is more portable on Fedora (see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#build-classpath ) ! Note: Usually the environment CLASSPATH is not set by default. As far as I see misc/tuxguitar.sh when this script is called CLASSPATH seems to be set finally like: -------------------------------------------------------- :/usr/share/tuxguitar/tuxguitar.jar:/usr/lib/java/swt.jar -------------------------------------------------------- Usually any environment value with begin with colon is unwilling (same for LD_LIBARARY_PATH) * Some script improvement * desktop-file-install -------------------------------------------------------- install -pm 644 %{SOURCE9} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/ desktop-file-install --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications --delete-original $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -------------------------------------------------------- - can be -------------------------------------------------------- desktop-file-install \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE9} -------------------------------------------------------- * installing hicolor icons -------------------------------------------------------- for dim in 16x16 24x24 32x32 48x48 64x64 96x96; do install -dm 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-$dim.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png done -------------------------------------------------------- "$ rpm -ql tuxguitar" shows unwilling results. This creates the directory named "%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png" and installs icon under the directory. * installing mime icons -------------------------------------------------------- install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-tuxguitar.png install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-gtp.png install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-ptb.png --------------------------------------------------------- - I guess --------------------------------------------------------- for type in \ tuxguitar gtp ptb do install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-${type}.png done --------------------------------------------------------- is cleaner * jni - jni files must be installed under %_libdir/%name: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Guideline * desktop database update - When installed desktop file contains MimeType key, desktop database must be updated: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database ! By the way it seems I can heard no sound and when I close tuxguitar: --------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost tuxguitar]$ tuxguitar fluidsynth: error: The "default" audio device is used by another application # # An unexpected error has been detected by Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x032afef2, pid=6874, tid=1616784 # # Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (1.6.0_0-b12 mixed mode linux-x86) # Problematic frame: # C [libfluidsynth.so.1+0x14ef2] delete_fluid_audio_driver+0x22 # # An error report file with more information is saved as: # /home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/Reviewing/tuxguitar/hs_err_pid6874.log # # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp # ^CMultiple segmentation faults occurred; can't display error dialog ----------------------------------------------------------- and hs_err_pid6874.log is attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:54:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011754.m91Hsgal010440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 13:54:40 EDT --- The Source: URL seems incorrect; at least, I get 404 when trying to download it. Not sure what's up there, but I found the package at: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RJ/RJBS/Software-License-%{version}.tar.gz I don't see that this should hold up approval of this package, though; it may simply be an error at CPAN. I guess you can switch to the more complicated URL or bug CPAN to fix the issue; either way works for me, and if nothing changes then the automated source-fetching report will start bugging you. After fixing that: * source files match upstream: d5e2f5aca8813132eb3fd7306e56f0c9b2863625c7d545ab606c5b25d499b05d Software-License-0.008.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Software::License) = 0.008 perl(Software::License::AGPL_3) perl(Software::License::Apache_1_1) perl(Software::License::Apache_2_0) perl(Software::License::Artistic_1_0) perl(Software::License::Artistic_2_0) perl(Software::License::BSD) perl(Software::License::FreeBSD) perl(Software::License::GFDL_1_2) perl(Software::License::GPL_1) perl(Software::License::GPL_2) perl(Software::License::GPL_3) perl(Software::License::LGPL_2_1) perl(Software::License::LGPL_3_0) perl(Software::License::MIT) perl(Software::License::Mozilla_1_0) perl(Software::License::Mozilla_1_1) perl(Software::License::Perl_5) perl(Software::License::QPL_1_0) perl(Software::License::Sun) perl(Software::License::Zlib) perl(Software::LicenseUtils) perl-Software-License = 0.008-3.fc10 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Data::Section) perl(Software::License::Artistic_1_0) perl(Software::License::GPL_1) perl(Sub::Install) perl(Text::Template) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=8, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED! The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:00:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011800.m91I0n00012229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-01 14:00:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1) Should I install the __init__.py in %install section. I am new to packaging > so I had a doubt in what you wrote __init_py{,c,o} - The reply from Parag will solve this issue. By the way a python skeleton spec file created by rpmdev-newspec says: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Remove CFLAGS=... for noarch packages (unneeded) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This says that for noarch packages the following line should be ---------------------------------------------------------------------- %{__python} setup.py build ---------------------------------------------------------------------- as Parag replied (i.e. the part CFLAGS=... should be dropped) > 2) The revision number to the Source tarball I downloaded should be added right > ? - There doesn't seem to exist any released tarball. You created tarball by pulling codes from svn repository and packaging them by using tar (perhaps). In such case also adding revison number to tarball is highly preferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 17:57:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 13:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011757.m91Hvj3N011395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm 2008-10-01 13:57:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-rdflib Short Description: Python library for working with RDF Owners: dmalcolm Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011802.m91I2JwR012765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #15 from Jan Kratochvil 2008-10-01 14:02:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Without some rocket science of automatic rebuilds etc. I think it is simple > > to register for watching the CVS commits of each other: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/binutils > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/avr-binutils > > Great, lets do it this way. > Can you do the package review for this package, please? Or do you know someone > who would volunteer? Bug 225615 review for the main binutils package is closed so this one may be closed as its DUPLICATE now? :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011820.m91IK11H018325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-01 14:20:00 EDT --- Well, %attr(750,%{name},%{name}) %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/* Would you explain why files (not directories) under %_sysconfdir/%name should have 0750 permission (i.e. executable permission)? Also, I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011841.m91IfgVG025476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 14:41:41 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:41:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:41:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011841.m91IfjqE025505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 14:41:44 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:40:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213658] Review Request: ibutils - Upstream OFED package to support InfiniBand hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011840.m91IepXf025302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(dledford at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 14:40:49 EDT --- This has been in the NEEDINFO state for months with no response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:42:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011842.m91Igref023721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 14:42:51 EDT --- I don't see you in the account system at all; what's your FAS ID? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:43:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011843.m91Ihi87023850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 14:43:42 EDT --- Marking this as not being ready for review; please clear the status whiteboard when the situation changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011849.m91InfZ2027018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #34 from Sylvain Beucler 2008-10-01 14:49:40 EDT --- I imported the package in CVS: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/freedink koji reported no errrors. I'm a bit puzzled about the inclusion status now, especially about Fedora 10 (which is in freeze). When will people be able to write "yum install freedink" ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:50:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011850.m91IobNN027515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 Neil Horman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Neil Horman 2008-10-01 14:50:36 EDT --- Cool Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pam_kcoda Short Description: pam module to automate autentication to coda servers Owners: nhorman at redhat.com Branches: devel F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011854.m91Isoh0028187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-01 14:54:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > I'm a bit puzzled about the inclusion status now, especially about Fedora 10 > (which is in freeze). Freeze is now over. > When will people be able to write "yum install freedink" ? :) Already in rawhide tree: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00019.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011853.m91IrX56028056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #16 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-01 14:53:32 EDT --- I think, you need some kind of ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch for that, because on i386, I'm getting: + ./configure --build=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --host=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --build=i386-redhat-linux --host=i386-redhat-linux --target=spu --enable-targets=i686-redhat-linux-gnu --with-sysroot=/usr/spu/sys-root --program-prefix=spu- --disable-shared --disable-werror --with-bugurl=http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/ checking build system type... i386-redhat-linux-gnu checking host system type... i386-redhat-linux-gnu checking target system type... Invalid configuration `spu': machine `spu' not recognized configure: error: /bin/sh ./config.sub spu failed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:55:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011855.m91Itwr5026641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-01 14:55:57 EDT --- By the way please rebuild your srpm also on F-9/8 and submit push requests on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011900.m91J074W029623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:00:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011857.m91Iv4eK026996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 14:57:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 18:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 14:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011858.m91IwVft027160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 14:58:30 EDT --- I assume the package name here is 'rubygem-highline' not 'kanarip'. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:02:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463770] Package review: perl-Module-Math-Depends In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011902.m91J2VR0030259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463770 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:02:30 EDT --- cvs done. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011901.m91J1P5q030082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:01:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:06:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460912] Review Request: DeviceKit-power - Power Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011906.m91J61hs031250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:06:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:06:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464802] Review Request: hunspell-fur - Friulian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011906.m91J6vMd031443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464802 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:06:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:07:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011907.m91J7jBp029727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:07:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:09:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011909.m91J9UB2029960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:09:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464805] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011908.m91J8MUR029809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464805 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-01 15:08:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011926.m91JQckP003589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-01 15:26:37 EDT --- Well, I chose gedit-latex-plugin because it's the name used in opensuse and in ubuntu. The guidelines also recommend to be consistent with other distributions. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011942.m91JgICv006919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-01 15:42:17 EDT --- Yes, that would be another criteria. It's your call. Use your own judgment. I'll agree with what you say. Btw, don't forget to do the debuginfo thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011951.m91JpM0A007492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 --- Comment #2 from Benny Amorsen 2008-10-01 15:51:21 EDT --- I don't have a Fedora account yet, I'm still at step 1.1.8 in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 19:55:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 15:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461793] Review Request: spu-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at spu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810011955.m91JtQOP009836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461793 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012002.m91K2PhT010321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 16:02:24 EDT --- Ahh, then you seem to have missed the text in the box with the red exclamation mark. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461791] Review Request: spu-newlib - C library targeted at spu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012010.m91KA3Gq013196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461791 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462966 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:07:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 378841] Review Request: python-rdflib - Python library for working with RDF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012007.m91K7Jpt012345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378841 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Dave Malcolm 2008-10-01 16:07:18 EDT --- Thanks. I fixed the issue in comment 13 and I've imported the resulting srpm into each of devel, F-9, and EL-5. I've built the package successfully in the devel and F-9 branches: devel: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=855217 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=855224 F-9 build submitted as new package update in Bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rdflib-2.4.0-7.fc9 Closing this bug as NEXTRELEASE Thanks everyone for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:11:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012011.m91KBcdu013839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462968 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012027.m91KRJ2G017359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Benny Amorsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #4 from Benny Amorsen 2008-10-01 16:27:19 EDT --- Yes. Sorry. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. I have created an account "amorsen" in FAS; I will have work approve my CLA as quickly as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012037.m91KbuYW018356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #21 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-10-01 16:37:54 EDT --- Hi, first, i want to apologize for not respond to this review. I will update the package this weekend. If Patrice really don't want to accept this package with this name, i will try to find a reviewer who would accept this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012039.m91KdqRY018624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #20 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-01 16:39:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=319139) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319139) [details] > crash log when tuxguitar exits > > For 1.0-5: > > * Requires > - I guess at least "Requires: libswt3-gtk2" is missing. > Yes, in update 1.0-2 I had removed that Requirement because rpmlint complained about explicit library dependency. But as it seems rpmbuild does not pick up this dependency automatically. Hence I re-included it. FIXED > * Using build-classpath > - For example > -------------------------------------------------------- > make SWT_JAR=%{_libdir}/java/swt.jar CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} > -I%{openjdkdir}/include -I%{openjdkdir}/include/linux -fPIC" > -------------------------------------------------------- > I guess using > -------------------------------------------------------- > make SWT_JAR=$(build-classpath swt) CFLAGS=..... > -------------------------------------------------------- > is more portable on Fedora (see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#build-classpath ) > I had tried that. It does not work. Maybe because %{_libdir}/java/swt.jar is a symlink. But the actual jar file is %{_libdir}/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.3.2.v3349.jar I don't think SWT_JAR=$(build-classpath org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_64_3.3.2.v3349) is a good solution. NOT FIXED(?) > ! Note: > Usually the environment CLASSPATH is not set by default. > As far as I see misc/tuxguitar.sh when this script is called > CLASSPATH seems to be set finally like: > -------------------------------------------------------- > :/usr/share/tuxguitar/tuxguitar.jar:/usr/lib/java/swt.jar > -------------------------------------------------------- > Usually any environment value with begin with colon is > unwilling (same for LD_LIBARARY_PATH) > FIXED > * Some script improvement > * desktop-file-install > -------------------------------------------------------- > install -pm 644 %{SOURCE9} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/ > desktop-file-install --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications > --delete-original $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop > -------------------------------------------------------- > - can be > -------------------------------------------------------- > desktop-file-install \ > --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ > %{SOURCE9} > -------------------------------------------------------- > FIXED > * installing hicolor icons > -------------------------------------------------------- > for dim in 16x16 24x24 32x32 48x48 64x64 96x96; do > install -dm 755 > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png > install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-$dim.png > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png > done > -------------------------------------------------------- > "$ rpm -ql tuxguitar" shows unwilling results. This creates > the directory named "%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/%{name}.png" > and installs icon under the directory. > FIXED > * installing mime icons > -------------------------------------------------------- > install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-tuxguitar.png > install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-gtp.png > install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-ptb.png > --------------------------------------------------------- > - I guess > --------------------------------------------------------- > for type in \ > tuxguitar gtp ptb > do > install -pm 644 TuxGuitar/share/skins/Lavender/icon-96x96.png \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/96x96/mimetypes/audio-x-${type}.png > done > --------------------------------------------------------- > is cleaner > FIXED > * jni > - jni files must be installed under %_libdir/%name: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Guideline > FIXED > * desktop database update > - When installed desktop file contains MimeType key, desktop database > must be updated: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database > FIXED > > ! By the way it seems I can heard no sound and when I > close tuxguitar: > --------------------------------------------------------- I usually use gervill or timidity plugins for sound output, for the latter you have to start timidity (timidity -iA -Os & )in the background and this one has the best sound quality. The fluidsynth plugin is kinda choppy when it's used directly. Tuxguitar does not pick up correct buffer sizes etc. To use the fluidsynth I would recommend starting a fluidsynth daemon in the background (e.g. one can use qsynth for that purpose). But I don't think this is a packaging issue. I provided the best I could from the material I have. (but I will report the issue to upstream, for sure) The updated files are: SRPM(F-8): http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar-1.0-6.fc8.src.rpm SRPM(F-9): http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar-1.0-6.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar.spec Thanks for the very extensive review! %changelog * Wed Oct 01 2008 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.0-6 - Required libswt3-gtk2 since rpmbuild doesn't pick it up. - Some more cleanup in the spec file - Fixed a typo regarding installation of icons - Called update-desktop-database in %%post and %%postun - jni files put in %%_libdir_/%%name. * Mon Sep 29 2008 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.0-5 - Compiled the package with openjdk instead of gcj. - ExcludeArch'ed ppc/ppc64 on F-8. ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:46:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465159] New: Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 Summary: Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oron at actcom.co.il QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam.spec SRPM URL: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam-5.4.006-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: TCExam is a free Web-based and Open-Source Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software application hosted on the SourceForge.net repository. TCExam is divided in two main sections: Public and Administration. Since the only packaging policy for web-applications refer to their location (/usr/share/app-name and not /var/www/app-name), I had to make several decisions -- So the current package is used by me to validate/correct these assumptions as well. Packaging overview: 1. Created selinux sub-package. 2. The application needs an instantiated database (either MySQL or Postgresql): a. Each database type is a sub-package, containing the init data. b. Since RPM installs are not interactive, I added a script that can create/init/drop the database (currently only MySQL implemented fully). c. This script is installed in sbindir (better suggestion?) d. The init data is in /usr/share/tcexam/setup (didn't have better place). 3. The php application have some scripts that embed configuration variables: a. For now, they are located as upstream put them (not in /etc). b. They are mod 0440 because some of them contain sensitive info (e.g: the database password). c. Therefore, they are owned by apache (so the web-app can access them) The apache user is created by httpd which is one of the depndencies of our package anyway. 4. The upstream package host its logs under the application directory: a. I fixed them to /var/log/tcexam/tce.log b. Added a logrotate config. 5. Likewise, I moved cached files to /var/cache/tcexam. 6. There wasn't any suitable Group. I used Applications/Web (shouldn't we have a group for these apps?) 7. The application is bundled with tcpdf.org which is itself a FOSS project (by the same upstream author). This should probably be refactored as a separate package (later). 8. For tcpdf, there are some bundled fonts (dejavu and freefont). While they look free. I'll have to check with upstream how can we use existing system fonts (maybe by linking). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:54:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012054.m91KsftY022151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-01 16:54:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Hi, > > first, i want to apologize for not respond to this review. > > I will update the package this weekend. > If Patrice really don't want to accept this package with this name, i will try > to find a reviewer who would accept this. You can drop a mail on fedora-devel-list stating th enature of the disagreement and asking for a reviewer who would agree with the name, or I can do it if you want to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 20:59:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 16:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012059.m91KxjGh023176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #8 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-01 16:59:44 EDT --- New package: Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gedit-latex-plugin-0.1.3.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Debuginfo is disabled. I prefer the name I proposed initially, gedit-latex-plugin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 21:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012125.m91LPfhd031432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 17:25:39 EDT --- Some final nitpicking: rpmlint: gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: E: non-empty-%postun /sbin/ldconfig Please remove the following line # Clean buildroot because it is between %postun mpi-libs -p /sbin/ldconfig and %clean which makes rpmbuild treat it as part of the %postun scriptlet. BuildRequires: openmpi-devel FYI: Alternatives support in openmpi will probably be gone in next release (it's already gone from lam), so you might need something like this in the future: BuildRequires: environment-modules and . /etc/profile.d/modules.sh module load %{_libdir}/openmpi/*/openmpi.module before ./configure with mpi %package zsh Summary: Zsh completion for GROMACS It's not just completion now, is it? :) Same for %package csh. %package devel Requires: gromacs = %{version}-%{release} %package mpi-devel Requires: gromacs-mpi = %{version}-%{release} Do the -devel packages really require the binaries? Or would it be sufficient to require the -libs subpackages. export CFLAGS="%optflags -Wa,--noexecstack" Could this CFLAGS addition be limited only to files that need it? That'd require some Makefile.in patching, of course. However, none of the above are blockers, so feel free to fix them after the package is imported. Good work. APPROVED Based on this package and your reviews of other packages, I'm sponsoring you. Please request "packager" group membership in the Fedora Account System and I'll approve your request. Welcome aboard! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 21:44:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012144.m91LiZNx003223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: simdock - |Review Request: simdock - |Fast and customizable |Fast and customizable |dockbar |dockbar --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 17:44:34 EDT --- Are you sponsored? I can't find your name in Fedora Account System. Some additional comments: Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files You must add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils and install the .desktop file using desktop-file-install. The desktop file itself should contain Icon=simdock not Icon=simdock.png Build fails on rawhide: error: %patch without corresponding "Patch:" tag Solution: use %patch0 It builds fine in mock after that, so BuildRequires (apart from the above) are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 21:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012152.m91LqaxL005275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |gedit-latex-plugin Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-01 17:52:35 EDT --- Great! Everything seems to be according to the book. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gedit-latex-plugin) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------------------------- Again, please keep track of the bugs you filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 21:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 17:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012158.m91Lw5JF006322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #23 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-10-01 17:58:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > You can drop a mail on fedora-devel-list stating th enature of > the disagreement and asking for a reviewer who would agree with > the name, or I can do it if you want to. I will do it this weekend after having updated the package. Thanks for the offer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464802] Review Request: hunspell-fur - Friulian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012214.m91MEXcF010132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464802 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:11:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464805] Review Request: hunspell-mi - Maori hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012211.m91MBGvI009636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464805 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-01 18:11:15 EDT --- This one's for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Howlett, its as close as I can get to Tongan at the moment :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012212.m91MCqH1009856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 Jesse Keating changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jesse Keating 2008-10-01 18:12:50 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: fedora-release New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464804] Review Request: hunspell-fy - Frisian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012218.m91MI9Hw011166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464804 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] New: Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-km.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-km-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Khmer hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] New: Review Request: Armenian hunspell dictionaries - Armenian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Armenian hunspell dictionaries - Armenian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 Summary: Review Request: Armenian hunspell dictionaries - Armenian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hy.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hy-0.10.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Armenian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] New: Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mg.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mg-0.20050108-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Malagasy hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 22:24:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:24:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012224.m91MOhFH012370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 --- Comment #3 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-01 18:24:42 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is unclean on RPM and SRPM + [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/screenruler-0.85-1.fc9.src.rpm screenruler.src: E: description-line-too-long on your desktop. It can be used to take both horizontal and vertical measurement 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/screenruler-0.85-1.fc9.noarch.rpm screenruler.noarch: E: description-line-too-long on your desktop. It can be used to take both horizontal and vertical measurement 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines and Ruby Packaging Guidelines + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Summary_and_description lines in the description should not be longer than 80 characters. + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines each Ruby package must have: Requires(abi): ruby BuildRequires: ruby Is this needed in this case? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully OK - ExcludeArch not needed OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently + While in some places you have used %{_name}, you have also used 'screenruler'. Would be nice if you could use either one of them for the sake of consistency. OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel not needed OK - no libtool archives xx - %{name}.desktop file is invalid + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop desktop-file-validate must be run on the .desktop file, and it says: [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ desktop-file-validate /usr/share/applications/fedora-screenruler.desktop /usr/share/applications/fedora-screenruler.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ The key "Encoding" is deprecated on all supported versions of Fedora. Please consider removing it. + Has upstream been notified of our .desktop file? OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets not needed OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 23:25:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:25:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012325.m91NPQR5023748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 19:25:24 EDT --- > PS. Reviewed bugs > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 > and > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 You missed the desktop file guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 23:26:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012326.m91NQvhU024074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 19:26:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319179) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319179) octopus-3.0.1 source file license check report -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 1 23:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: Pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810012332.m91NWsRL026483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #3 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-01 19:32:53 EDT --- Sorry for the late reply, I'm away from home and with a rather spotty connection. (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes. > > * Build failure > - Your srpm does not build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=843287 > * At least python is needed for BuildRequires > * Also even after python is added to BuildRequires the build fails (on > F-9+) like: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Pmw-1.3.2-py2.5.egg-info > Fixed. > > * Redundant definition macro > - %python_sitearch is used nowhere > - Also it is not needed to define %version, %release macro explicitly. > > * Source URL > - %SOURCE must be written with full URL: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > Fixed. > * The line > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > - is not needed. You define $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Fixed. > * Also I think this srpm should be named as "python-pmw": Done. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw-1.3.2-2.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:06:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020006.m9206oVL031253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #2 from Jameson 2008-10-01 20:06:49 EDT --- I wasn't sure if I should submit them all at once so functionality could be reviewed or if I should wait until the dependancies made it into Fedora before submitting the others, so they could be tested more easily. Unfortunately the libprojectM package has pretty much no functionality on its own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020014.m920E52i032388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #3 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-01 20:14:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > * Please also check my comments in bug 462250 > * Build failure > - Your srpm does not build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=843282 > It seems at least "BuildRequires: libGL-devel" is needed. > fixed. > * Desktop file > - If this is GUI application, a proper desktop file must be added: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files done. > * the %version and %release defines are redundant, since they are filled > during build with the "Version" and "Release" tags content. Done. > * Source tag should include the full URI to the package; AFAICT this is not > available unless you are paying support to Delano Scientific. If I am correct > you will need to create the tarball from upstream SVN, documenting the > procedure in the spec file (usually the easiest way is to add a small script > to compose the tarball). Done. > * There is no need to prepare and fill the docs directory, a single line in > the files section like: This was only done since the python setup script does not install the files into RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > * it's the first time I see the sanity check on RPM_BUILD_ROOT before removing > it. I can't remember any guideline against it, but I'd avoid it anyway. removed. new spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-2.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020017.m920HnAH000667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 20:17:47 EDT --- OK, so the only complaints I had were related to the license, and that's cleared up now, I think this is ready. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020018.m920Ij52000737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 20:18:45 EDT --- OK'd items omitted. - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-i386/result octopus.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/f8/9fbfbbed296d4a83448b1549262a7c9a7ae490 ../../../../bin/oct-test_mpi octopus.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.build-id octopus.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/debug/.build-id octopus.i386: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/32/6af5072f170e31d82e0f48aab7f5686283d55c ../../../../bin/octopus_mpi octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-cross-section.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-cross-section.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-rsf.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-rsf.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/octopus_mpi.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/octopus_mpi.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-test_mpi.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-test_mpi.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-help.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-help.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/octopus.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/octopus.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-test.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-test.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-center-geom.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-center-geom.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-xyz-anim.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-xyz-anim.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-vibrational.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-vibrational.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-harmonic-spectrum.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-harmonic-spectrum.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-broad.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-broad.debug octopus.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-oscillator-strength.debug octopus.i386: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/oct-oscillator-strength.debug octopus-mpi.i386: W: no-documentation octopus.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 40, tab: line 1) octopus-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 20 warnings. Something has gone wrong here. %{_libdir}/* seems to be the culprit. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . %post install-info %{_infodir}/octopus.info &> /dev/null %preun install-info --remove octopus &> /dev/null See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo The tarball contains a number of bundled libraries that have separate upstreams. You should package them separately and modify (or work with upstream to modify) octopus to use the external, system-wide packages instead. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Some files are under GPLv2+ and some (libxc) are under LGPLv3+. There are many files without licensing information, so please ask upstream to fix that. See attached log (attachment #319179) from licensecheck for more details. external_libs/expokit is non-free and must be removed from distributed sources unless you can convince its authors to relicense it under a free license. external_libs/metis-4.0 is non-free. external_libs/qshep is non-free as well. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. License: GPLv2+ Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Source URL is bad: $ spectool -g octopus.spec --2008-10-01 23:47:15-- http://www.tddft.org/programs/octopus/download/octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz Resolving www.tddft.org... 193.137.208.200 Connecting to www.tddft.org|193.137.208.200|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-10-01 23:47:16 ERROR 404: Not Found. SRPM source file doesn't match upstream: 54e00d2eb2af7fbd902876bef32b409e octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz e17887506f2596e1826d2d09bc75214f octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz.srpm - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. >From configure output: checking for ATL_xerbla in -latlas... no Maybe add BuildRequires: atlas-devel? checking for netcdf... no configure: WARNING: Could not find netcdf library. *** Will compile without netcdf support BuildRequires: netcdf-devel seems not enough, you need to fix configure, too. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . %install rm -rf %{buildroot} cd single make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} cd .. cd mpi make install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} cd .. %clean rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} Inconsistent usage, please fix. One last thing: there's a testsuite in the package. Please consider adding %check make check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020025.m920P9Q0003418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-01 20:25:08 EDT --- Well, sure, but the point is that you use the "Depends on" fields of the various tickets to indicate the order in which they must be reviewed. I think this ticket should be the first one but without looking at the specs or trying to build, I can't be sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020027.m920RoaE003796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 20:27:50 EDT --- rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020026.m920QY9g003667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 20:26:33 EDT --- rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020026.m920Qbql003701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 20:26:36 EDT --- rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020029.m920TFx2003886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-01 20:29:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > > License: GPLv2+ > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#GPLCompatibilityMatrix I'm not sure, but I think it's not linking, but distributing libxc as part of octopus (or is that "mere aggregation"?) that affects the license. However, the license tag could definitely stay at GPLv2+ if you package libxc separately and only link against it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:30:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020030.m920UEtm002763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:30:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020030.m920UD8M002742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020027.m920RrZZ002278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-01 20:27:53 EDT --- rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020030.m920Uwg9004512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020032.m920WItm004655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464054 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464050] Package Review Request for projectM-libvisual In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020030.m920UvNE004491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464050 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464054] Package Review Request for projectM-pulseaudio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020032.m920WHvL004634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464054 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464051] Package Review Request for projectM-jack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020031.m920VYks003010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464051 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464049 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:31:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464049] Package Review Request for libprojectM-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020031.m920VZZI003031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464049 Jameson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 00:39:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 20:39:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020039.m920dRto004315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #4 from Jameson 2008-10-01 20:39:26 EDT --- Oh, I got ya. Thanks. Like I said, I'm new to this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 02:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020219.m922JlJ2028390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 --- Comment #4 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-01 22:19:46 EDT --- Updated spec file and srpm at; Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gruler/screenruler.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/gruler/screenruler-0.85-2.fc10.src.rpm 'BuildRequires: ruby' is not needed for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 02:29:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 22:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020229.m922TZv1026623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-01 22:29:33 EDT --- Will you update this un-extra-fonts package submission in line with the final un-core-fonts package when you have time? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 04:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460867] Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020419.m924JV9E015023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-02 00:19:29 EDT --- Looks good, all issues have been addressed. =====> perl-ORLite-0.13-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-ORLite-0.13-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl(ORLite) = 0.13 perl-ORLite = 0.13-1.fc9 ====> requires for perl-ORLite-0.13-1.fc9.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(DBI) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(Params::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 04:31:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 00:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020431.m924VaiG013246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Hutterer 2008-10-02 00:31:35 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics New Branches: F-10 Owners: whot Please create an F-10 branch for stabilization work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 05:19:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020519.m925Jo52021467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-02 01:19:49 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Mouse-0.09-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Mouse.spec Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=856180 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 05:32:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020532.m925W3PC027034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #11 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-02 01:32:02 EDT --- I try to consistently include the tests in %doc for a number of reasons -- one, I don't know what someone else might find useful, two even if there's no explicit documentation example usage is never a bad things, and finally, even if the the test suite comprises one test (say a use test), then at least the person looking under %_docdir can see that. RPM shouldn't be generating requires/provides on files under %_docdir, but it does, so until then the filtering magic is necessary. ...and I suspect it's commonplace enough that we can call it "science" now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 05:41:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020541.m925fYFl025223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-02 01:41:33 EDT --- > Are you sponsored? I can't find your name in Fedora Account System. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/terjeros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 05:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020554.m925sXrv030562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 01:54:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: gnome-commander New Branches: F-10 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 05:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 01:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209617] Review Request: comix - A user-friendly, customizable image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020553.m925r4b5027067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209617 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 01:53:01 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: comix New Branches: F-10 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460867] Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020803.m9283SYJ018345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-02 04:03:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-ORLite Short Description: relation system specifically for SQLite Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:22:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:22:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020822.m928MZmt023307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 04:22:34 EDT --- (Just commenting again that as I guess I have no time to review this ticket for now, I appreciate if someone else would review this ticket) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:23:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020823.m928NTE6023424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Jouni V?liaho changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jounille at hotmail.com --- Comment #14 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-02 04:23:28 EDT --- I tried to compile the latest gromacs-4.0-5.rc2.fc9.src.rpm on my i686 machine but it failed although compiling of the source code (gromacs-4.0-5.rc2) by ./comfigure and make was succesful. Could you also provide a working src.rpm for ia32? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:30:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020830.m928UhNZ025356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 04:30:42 EDT --- Okay, with your explanation and some googling I managed to play sounds by tuxguitar. Two things from me: * One more thing for misc/tuxguitar.sh - The line 142 should be: ---------------------------------------------------------------- exec ${JAVA} ${JAVA_FLAGS} ${PACKAGE_MAIN} $arg "$@" ---------------------------------------------------------------- i.e. add exec to replace the called shell to java process. * Freeze at the end - Now I can hear sounds played by tuxguitar. However every time I quit tuxguitar it freezes and I have to kill the process (tuxguitar) by SIGKILL. Would you have any clue? Wolfy, are you also reviewing this? If you don't think there is any blocker on this bug I think I can approve this package after I receive a reply from Orcan about 2 issues above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020831.m928VDdK028666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-02 04:31:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: collectd New Branches: F-10 Owners: rjones,berrange,apevec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020833.m928XPaZ025866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-02 04:33:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I tried to compile the latest gromacs-4.0-5.rc2.fc9.src.rpm on my i686 machine > but it failed although compiling of the source code (gromacs-4.0-5.rc2) by > ./comfigure and make was succesful. The error messages, please. What distribution are you running? > Could you also provide a working src.rpm for ia32? I'll have to wait until I can use the Fedora build system to see which architectures the SRPM builds under and make the necessary fixes to the spec file. (Including ExcludeArch for those architectures I can't get GROMACS to compile on.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020846.m928kID8032285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-02 04:46:17 EDT --- Thank you very much! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gedit-latex-plugin Short Description: Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 08:52:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 04:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020852.m928q3rZ001258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-02 04:52:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > BuildRequires: openmpi-devel > > FYI: Alternatives support in openmpi will probably be gone in next release > (it's already gone from lam), so you might need something like this in the > future: > > BuildRequires: environment-modules > and > . /etc/profile.d/modules.sh > module load %{_libdir}/openmpi/*/openmpi.module > before ./configure with mpi OK. Do you have any idea how this works in RHEL5? The newest update includes the mpi-selector tool, which puts the MPI bin dir into the path. > export CFLAGS="%optflags -Wa,--noexecstack" > > Could this CFLAGS addition be limited only to files that need it? That'd > require some Makefile.in patching, of course. Well, that would be of course nicer, but the flag only operates on assembly files anyways :) > However, none of the above are blockers, so feel free to fix them after the > package is imported. Good work. > > APPROVED Thanks for bearing with me. > Based on this package and your reviews of other packages, I'm sponsoring you. > Please request "packager" group membership in the Fedora Account System and > I'll approve your request. Welcome aboard! Done. (Spec and SRPMS still in the same place.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 09:00:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020900.m92904B5003211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-02 05:00:03 EDT --- > external_libs/expokit is non-free and must be removed from distributed sources > unless you can convince its authors to relicense it under a free license. > > external_libs/metis-4.0 is non-free. > > external_libs/qshep is non-free as well. Oh my, you are right. This is a showstopper. I'm contacting upstream to see whether they have any plans to migrate to free implementations. Is there an automatic tool to check the licenses of the source files? > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > > License: GPLv2+ > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. OK. Funny, I based my SPEC on the SRPM available from the Octopus website. You'd think the developers had their licenses right.. > SRPM source file doesn't match upstream: > 54e00d2eb2af7fbd902876bef32b409e octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz > e17887506f2596e1826d2d09bc75214f octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz.srpm Used the one from upstream SRPM. My bad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 09:08:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020908.m9298q3T001755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 05:08:51 EDT --- Some notes: * EVR - At least EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) needs fixing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages * configure - Doesn't the following work? ----------------------------------------------------------- # Single precision mkdir single cd single ln -sf ../configure %configure \ --disable-rpath --enable-shared \ --disable-static --enable-float \ ....... ----------------------------------------------------------- * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired. Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so on), which is rather a blocker. Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name, for example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed. * Duplicate files ----------------------------------------------------------- $ rpm -qlp *rpm | sort | uniq -d /usr/bin/GMXRC /usr/bin/GMXRC.bash /usr/bin/GMXRC.csh /usr/bin/GMXRC.zsh /usr/bin/demux.pl ------------------------------------------------------------ - Fix these. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 09:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020914.m929EWmq006175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 05:14:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names > - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired. > Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so > on), > which is rather a blocker. > Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name, > for > example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed. - Or rename such files so that it makes sure that the names of files are peculiar to this rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 09:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020915.m929FLOQ003510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #19 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-02 05:15:20 EDT --- I was using the latest updated fedora 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686. The output of rpmbuild -bb gromacs.spec >output.txt 2>&1 is available at http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/output.txt I have not yet tested to compile mpi version from the source code. Here are the last lines of output: + mkdir mpi-single + cd mpi-single + ../configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --disable-rpath --enable-shared --disable-static --enable-float --with-external-blas --with-external-lapack --with-gsl --with-x --enable-mpi --program-suffix=_mpi checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking how to create a ustar tar archive... gnutar checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-cc... no checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-icc... no checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-xlc... no checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... no checking for cc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for mpxlc... no checking for mpicc... mpicc checking whether the MPI cc command works... yes checking for catamount... no checking how to run the C preprocessor... mpicc -E checking whether mpicc accepts -O3... yes checking whether mpicc accepts -malign-double... yes checking whether mpicc accepts -funroll-all-loops... yes ****************************************** * Using CFLAGS from environment variable * ****************************************** checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E checking for ANSI C header files... no checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no checking for int... yes checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int) See `config.log' for more details. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28652 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28652 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 09:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 05:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810020942.m929gWFn012875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-02 05:42:31 EDT --- Hi Deji, Can you re-review based on the current ekiga 3 build in rawhide. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=856416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:03:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021003.m92A303g017653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #20 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-02 06:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #13) > > BuildRequires: openmpi-devel > > > > FYI: Alternatives support in openmpi will probably be gone in next release > > (it's already gone from lam), so you might need something like this in the > > future: > > > > BuildRequires: environment-modules > > and > > . /etc/profile.d/modules.sh > > module load %{_libdir}/openmpi/*/openmpi.module > > before ./configure with mpi > > OK. > > Do you have any idea how this works in RHEL5? The newest update includes the > mpi-selector tool, which puts the MPI bin dir into the path. Yeah, that's a pain, but RHEL5.2 seems to have its own mechanism that works in similar fashion to environment-modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021002.m92A2oJM014811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #1 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-02 06:02:49 EDT --- > upstream release to https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/ in progress done in the meantime: http://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/u/publican/publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021006.m92A6WsF018611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-02 06:06:31 EDT --- Odd that it source tar.gz doesn't exist there - it is certainly supposed to. I'll change the URL to point to the alternate location indexed by author instead of by module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463770] Package review: perl-Module-Math-Depends In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021009.m92A9DYt019017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463770 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:09:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463763] Package review: perl-Module-Inspector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021009.m92A9Eji019043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463763 Bug 463763 depends on bug 463770, which changed state. Bug 463770 Summary: Package review: perl-Module-Math-Depends https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463770 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:09:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021009.m92A9pp4019142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-02 06:09:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Some notes: > > * EVR > - At least EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) needs fixing: Right, I seem to have missed that. Thanks for noticing. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > > * configure > - Doesn't the following work? > ----------------------------------------------------------- > # Single precision > mkdir single > cd single > ln -sf ../configure > %configure \ > --disable-rpath --enable-shared \ > --disable-static --enable-float \ > ....... > ----------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, I was thinking about how to avoid the long versions and this should work. > * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names > - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired. > Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so > on), > which is rather a blocker. > Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name, > for > example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed. You're right. I guess I have to withdraw the approval until we resolve this. Thanks for catching it. > * Duplicate files > ----------------------------------------------------------- > $ rpm -qlp *rpm | sort | uniq -d > /usr/bin/GMXRC > /usr/bin/GMXRC.bash > /usr/bin/GMXRC.csh > /usr/bin/GMXRC.zsh > /usr/bin/demux.pl > ------------------------------------------------------------ > - Fix these. Ehhh, this happened after I asked Jussi to move the GMXRC.* scripts to subpackages and forgot that he had %{_bindir}/* in the main package. rpmlint should catch such things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:07:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021007.m92A7gJ8016096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-02 06:07:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Software-License Short Description: Package that provides templated software licenses Owners: berrange Branches: F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:11:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021011.m92ABSwW019901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #22 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-02 06:11:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I was using the latest updated fedora 2.6.26.3-29.fc9.i686. > > The output of rpmbuild -bb gromacs.spec >output.txt 2>&1 > is available at http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/output.txt > > I have not yet tested to compile mpi version from the source code. > > Here are the last lines of output: [...] > checking size of int... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof (int) > See `config.log' for more details. > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28652 (%build) > > > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.28652 (%build) Please post the failed test output from config.log. It builds fine in mock/devel-i386 and mock/f9-x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462173] Review Request: terminator - the robot future of terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021013.m92ADKde017538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462173 Chris Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cmsj at tenshu.net --- Comment #7 from Chris Jones 2008-10-02 06:13:19 EDT --- Hey guys, thanks very much for the packaging efforts. Without wishing to rain on your parade, I think it's worth mentioning that 0.11 has been released now. I don't think it should significantly affect the packaging end of things though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:15:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021015.m92AF6ht018276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 06:15:05 EDT --- Some more notes: * Directory ownership issue - Please make it sure that directories which are created when installing a rpm are correctly owned by the rpm (or rpms which the rpms depends on). The following may be rather difficult to find out, but for example: ---------------------------------------------------- # rpm -i gromacs-libs-4.0-6.rc2.fc10.i386.rpm gromacs-devel-4.0-6.rc2.fc10.i386.rpm # env LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/gromacs/template/ gromacs-devel-4.0-6.rc2.fc10.i386 # env LANG=C rpm -qf /usr/share/gromacs/ file /usr/share/gromacs is not owned by any package ---------------------------------------------------- Here gromacs-devel Requires gromacs-libs, however neither of -devel, -libs packages Requires -common. So the above install succeeds. However the directory %{_datadir}/gromacs is owned by -common package so with this install %{_datadir}/gromacs is not owned by any packages, which is not right. Here -devel package must require -common directly or indirectly. Also, please check the ownership of %{_datadir}/gromacs/template/ or so. * ldconfig - Why does -devel package call /sbin/ldconfig? * Summary ---------------------------------------------------- %package devel Summary: Header files and static libraries for GROMACS ---------------------------------------------------- - What does "static" libraries mean here? * Timestamps - When using "install" or "cp" commands add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. Also try ---------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" install ---------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Using %_builddir ----------------------------------------------------- # Install manual install -c -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/gromacs-4.0_rc2/ ----------------------------------------------------- - "install -cpm 0644 %{SOURCE1} ." is sufficient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:26:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021026.m92AQ1SD023648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #17 from Aidan Delaney 2008-10-02 06:26:00 EDT --- @Robert Scheck: I cannot replicate this issue on my F9 i686 system on which autoconf autodetects the host as i386-redhat-linux-gnu. Can you provide more info on your system such as the OS version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021030.m92AUKNI021928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-02 06:30:19 EDT --- Well, this package was needed and maybe will be needed again for Padre. Could we close it, when we don't need it at this moment? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021036.m92AaQji026044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna 2008-10-02 06:36:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > you will need to create the tarball from upstream SVN, documenting the > > procedure in the spec file (usually the easiest way is to add a small script > > to compose the tarball). > > Done. That's better, but getting sources off the 1.1 branch does not guarantee we can reproduce the build at any random time in the future because the branch will likely be modified by bug fix commits. You need to locate a suitable revision (possibly, but not necessarily, off the 1.1 branch) and pull that one. I failed to note this also imply you need rename the release tag according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages so the package will be named something like: pymol-1.1-x.YYYYMMDDsvnREV > > > * There is no need to prepare and fill the docs directory, a single line in > > the files section like: > > This was only done since the python setup script does not install the files > into RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Yeah, that's normal. But files listed in %doc are picked up from RPM_BUILD_DIR so it will work (I just tested it locally) > > > * it's the first time I see the sanity check on RPM_BUILD_ROOT before removing > > it. I can't remember any guideline against it, but I'd avoid it anyway. > > removed. You removed too much ;) %install and %clean section must start with rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} I was suggesting removing just to the check ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} != "/" lastly, mock build still fails due to unpackaged egg-info file, please add %{python_sitearch}/*egg-info to %files. Full details at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021047.m92AlGYp028591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #10 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-02 06:47:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Is there an automatic tool to check the licenses of the source files? I'm using licensecheck.pl from debian-utils. Perhaps it could be added to fedora-rpmdevtools. > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > > > License: GPLv2+ > > Should be GPLv3+. IIUC LGPLv3+ libraries can only be linked in if GPLv2+ > > sources are "upgraded" to GPLv3. I'll re-check this, but I think I'm correct. > > OK. Funny, I based my SPEC on the SRPM available from the Octopus website. > You'd think the developers had their licenses right.. See comment #8. > > SRPM source file doesn't match upstream: > > 54e00d2eb2af7fbd902876bef32b409e octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz > > e17887506f2596e1826d2d09bc75214f octopus-3.0.1.tar.gz.srpm > > Used the one from upstream SRPM. My bad. Maybe ask upstream why they are different? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 10:59:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021059.m92AxEWa032097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #24 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-02 06:59:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > > Please post the failed test output from config.log. It builds fine in > mock/devel-i386 and mock/f9-x86_64. Ok. Something is probably wrong on my PC configuration. Here are the config.log files: http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/single/config.log http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/mpi-single/config.log http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/double/config.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 11:16:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021116.m92BGrfY001806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #25 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-02 07:16:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > Please post the failed test output from config.log. It builds fine in > > mock/devel-i386 and mock/f9-x86_64. > > Ok. Something is probably wrong on my PC configuration. > Here are the config.log files: > > http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/mpi-single/config.log ./conftest: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Looks like your openmpi is not installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 11:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021124.m92BO5rB003505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-02 07:24:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I think, you need some kind of ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch for that, because > on i386, I'm getting: Hi Robert, I wasn't able to reproduce the problem you are facing. Have a look for my build result here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=856414&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 11:27:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 07:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458994] Review Request: liveusb-creator - A liveusb creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021127.m92BRScH006677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458994 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 12:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021221.m92CLpaZ018950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #26 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-02 08:21:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #24) > > (In reply to comment #22) > > > > > > Please post the failed test output from config.log. It builds fine in > > > mock/devel-i386 and mock/f9-x86_64. > > > > Ok. Something is probably wrong on my PC configuration. > > Here are the config.log files: > > > > http://bioinf.uta.fi/~java/gromacs/mpi-single/config.log > > ./conftest: error while loading shared libraries: libmpi.so.0: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > > Looks like your openmpi is not installed properly. Thanks! You were right. I removed openmpi-1.2.4-2.fc9.i386 and openmpi-libs-1.2.4-2.fc9.i386 packages. I had to use --noscripts option because of error: %preun(openmpi-1.2.4-2.fc9.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 (bug?) Then I reinstall then by yum install openmpi openmpi-libs and now the gromacs builds properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 12:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021253.m92CrxJ9026799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 12:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021254.m92Cs0a1026823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Bug 457517 depends on bug 463768, which changed state. Bug 463768 Summary: Package review: perl-PAR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 13:06:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460912] Review Request: DeviceKit-power - Power Management Service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021306.m92D6466030589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460912 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Richard Hughes 2008-10-02 09:06:02 EDT --- Thanks Kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:22:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021522.m92FM5NR030417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 11:22:04 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021524.m92FOk9c030828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno_cornec at hp.com --- Comment #10 from Bruno Cornec 2008-10-02 11:24:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I'll take care of this. For the moment there are a few issues: > 1. major one: during compilation the mandatory gcc flags as imposed by Fedora > (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags) are not > used. Instead compilation is done with -Wall -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer Fixed. > > 2. minor issues: > - I see no point in applying all the debian patches. We have no need for the > content of the debian folder. You do not package it, which is OK, but I would > have adjusted the patches to better fit Fedora. Not a blocker, feel free to > leave it as it is. I chose to keep the debian specific stuff, in order to be able to easily back port further Debian patches (which are useful also for the Fedora package) in the future if needed. Removing the creation of the debian content would make a different patch. If it's not a big issue I'd rather keep it like that. > - there is a missing "s" in the Summary(fr) line (des bande -> des bandes) Fixed as well. Please look at ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:22:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021522.m92FMwI0027907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 11:22:56 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021535.m92FZfDp031713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #41 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-02 11:35:39 EDT --- I haven't proceeded further with this package as eMusic has changed the download format, meaning that as it stands germanium won't be able to download music from the site. I've corresponded with the upstream author about this and am working on changing the file parsing to deal with the new .emx format. Once that's done I'll upload a new version and work on importing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021537.m92FbPpp032190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-02 11:37:24 EDT --- If it's no longer needed, obviously you can close the review ticket and anything which depends on it. Its up to you, and there is certainly no shortage of packages for me to review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:38:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021538.m92FcDUn032301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #22 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-02 11:38:11 EDT --- What's the point of "%define debug_package %{nil}" in this package? noarch packages don't generate debuginfo by default... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021538.m92FcVdF032375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at linuxnetz.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-02 11:38:30 EDT --- Looks like this was a local issue on single box which seems to be a bit broken. Finally a scratch build in Koji worked as expected. Package looks good to me, thus: APPROVED Note, that I'm not really able to test the spu functionally itself, just the packaging and around. And please fix the last remaining warning before importing or shortly after: spu-binutils.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.18.50.0.9-6 2.18.50.0.9-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:50:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021550.m92FoDMl004502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 11:50:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: jd New Branches: F-10 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:50:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:50:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021550.m92Foo4M004925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+, fedora-review? |fedora-cvs?, fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021559.m92FxM5D006347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-02 11:59:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spu-binutils Short Description: A GNU collection of binary utilities Owners: jroth Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: adrian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 15:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021558.m92FwPML004701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #20 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-02 11:58:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > APPROVED Thanks a lot! > spu-binutils.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.18.50.0.9-6 > 2.18.50.0.9-5.fc10 Yes, I'm sorry I accidentally created the SRPM for the scratch build with the wrong .spec file. I already fixed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021612.m92GCr42008369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Jonathan Roberts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonrob.one at googlemail.com --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-02 12:12:51 EDT --- Updated the spec file to fix your comments so far, and also updated to the latest upstream release. SPEC: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ume-launcher.spec SRPM: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: Pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021616.m92GGY9b010864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 12:16:33 EDT --- For 1.3.2-2: * URL - I think http://pmw.sourceforge.net/ is better for URL * SourceURL - For tarball on sourceforge.net please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * %prep --------------------------------------------------- %setup -q -n Pmw.1.3.2/src --------------------------------------------------- - After rebuilding the directory Pmw.1.3.2/src under %_builddir But it leaved Pmw.1.3.2 directory undeleted, which is not right. %setup directory (relative to %_builddir) must not contain any slash. %build %install rm -rf * License --- Some files under src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/contrib/ are under GPLv2+ --- Others are under MIT (from src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/copyright.html) - So the license tag should be "MIT and GPLv2+". * %clean, %install - %clean section is empty See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : "MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, ...." - Also %install does not contain any "cleaning" line. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PreppingBuildRootForInstall * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{python_sitelib}/ itself is owned by python and should not be owned by this rpm. * Documents - As license information is in src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/copyright.html at least this file should be included in %doc. I guess ------------------------------------------------- %doc src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/ ------------------------------------------------- is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021626.m92GQc57013626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #22 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-10-02 12:26:36 EDT --- Hello Jochen, I'm curious to know why you didn't add the Branches F-9 and F-10 ? I'm willing to list this package to be part of the Fedora Electronic Lab. I'm inviting you guys to subscribe to this low traffic mailing list :) https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021630.m92GUZfO012818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 --- Comment #16 from Justin Zygmont 2008-10-02 12:30:33 EDT --- my apologies for the long delay, I will continue to work on this and other packages, and update further. Thanks for everyone's patience and help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:31:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021631.m92GVrTY014797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-10-02 12:31:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmicrohttpd Short Description: Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications Owners: epienbro Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: epienbro -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 16:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021647.m92GlMuB017871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #5 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-02 12:47:21 EDT --- I found a fix for that compilation error, but then there was another error. Again I corresponded with the upstream author and it appears to be a glib bug: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316221 Is it acceptable to turn off -Werror in the meantime? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 17:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021704.m92H49lx018952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 13:04:08 EDT --- Also, * Please write the origin of SOURCE1 (if possible write a full URL, or write comments how you gained the SOURCE1) * Remove redundant Requires. python-pwm already Requires python, tkinter so these need not be listed on the Requires of this rpm. * When using or "install" commands add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Replace %_usr by %_prefix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 17:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021714.m92HE8IH022492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #32 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-02 13:14:06 EDT --- I still have some comments. Instead of %define with_kde, please use bcond_with or bcond_without. The kdebase >= 3.0.0 BuildRequires is strange. Shouldn't it be kdebase-devel >= 3.0.0? And I don't really see the reason why it shouldn't also be set on fedora > 8? You should not repeat the summary in the %description. The checkout instructions are not enough, you should add the command that allows you to do the archive. The line with CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" seems unuseful to me And you use $LOCALFLAGS but it is not set?? Remove the # Setup for parallel builds, use instead make %{?_smp_mflags} You should not do rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} in %clean. You install icons, so it is likely that a post script is missing. Remove the Distribution tag. Why the BuildRequires autoconf, automake? Also remove gcc and gcc-c++ from BuildRequires, please, they are in the minimal buildroot. I also thought that zip was there too, but I am too lazy to check. openssl Requires should be picked up automatically. Some suggestions, feel free not to use these: * the TABs look bad in my editor, maybe you could either use only spaces or use tabs more consistently * The BuildRequires line that is very long could be split in 2 lines * remove from the description the text: SIM has countless features, many of them are listed at: http://sim-im.berlios.de/ since the URL is already a rpm tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 17:16:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021716.m92HGkuC021669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #22 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-02 13:16:45 EDT --- > * One more thing for misc/tuxguitar.sh > - The line 142 should be: >---------------------------------------------------------------- > exec ${JAVA} ${JAVA_FLAGS} ${PACKAGE_MAIN} $arg "$@" >---------------------------------------------------------------- > i.e. add exec to replace the called shell to java process. FIXED > * Freeze at the end That happened to me once (when I was running tuxguitar with timidity and openjdk) out of so many and I reported it to the author. See http://www.tuxguitar.com.ar/forum/4/817/need-help-with-packaging-for-fedora/ Search for "OutOfMemoryError". But I wasn't able to re-produce this. As I indicated in the above link we can try playing with the stack sizes (the memory allocation for each thread, indicated by "-Xms128m -Xmx128m" in the launching script). The author suggested to increase them while google says decreasing might help. I suggest switching to sun's java (no need to recompile, just use "alternatives") and try to see if it will freeze again. If it doesn't then there is a problem with openjdk and we need it to report to them. We might be able to get more feedback once the package hits rawhide. The updated files: SRPM(F-8): http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc8.src.rpm SRPM(F-9): http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://6mata.com:8014/tuxguitar/tuxguitar.spec %changelog * Thu Oct 02 2008 Orcan Ogetbil - 1.0-7 - Added "exec" to replace the called shell to java process in the launching script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 17:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021723.m92HNcJa024301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-02 13:23:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Is it acceptable to turn off -Werror in the meantime? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 18:10:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021810.m92IAbXP003015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #9 from jebba 2008-10-02 14:10:35 EDT --- /me looks at calendar Ok, I updated fmit.spec and fmit-0.97.7-2.fc9.src.rpm with updates per Kevin's #7 comments. ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 18:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021820.m92IKYYd002649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 --- Comment #6 from Eduardo Habkost 2008-10-02 14:20:33 EDT --- %{__global_cflags} added to x86_64. Changes at: http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot-5.4.4-4.fc10.src.rpm http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot.spec.diff http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=857432 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 18:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021829.m92ITCMJ004801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-02 14:29:11 EDT --- In order to make tracking easier for everyone, please bump the release tag each time you modify the spec file (and _add_ a corresponding changelog entry, not _replace_ the previous one as you have done). For instance %changelog * Thu Oct 02 2008 Bruno Cornec 1.19-2.fc9 - fix compilation flags * Sat Sep 20 2008 Bruno Cornec 1.19-1.fc9 - Updated to 1.19 as of 02.oct.2008, ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec still has the missing "s" in Summary(fr). Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -XXXXXX)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing th e text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: a2bb4ed163cb166bf54a1ba341c8d1fcba48f271 buffer-1.19.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packag ing Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, i f available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === Issues === 1.Summary(Fr) should be fixed before uploading to CVS ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ I will take a look at your other packages and if satisfied I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 18:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021850.m92Ioc2w011701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 --- Comment #37 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-02 14:50:34 EDT --- We have an issue here. Fedora packages MUST be able to be built using ONLY the content of the Fedora repository. Hence the Require: mindi-busybox will prevent building mindi, as long as mindi-busybox is not a valid Fedora package. And I do not see even a review request for such a beast. Note that I believe that a fork of an existing package would not be accepted without an approval from the packaging committee. I am sure that a proper solution could be found, once the correct arguments are presented. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 18:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021850.m92Iohmg009344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-02 14:50:42 EDT --- Updated package: - fix patch macro - install desktop file spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/simdock/simdock.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=857464&name=simdock-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=857463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:04:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463242] Review Request: ACE ssh module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021904.m92J4oIq014844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463242 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:04:49 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021908.m92J8Tnb015713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:08:28 EDT --- Per a comment from Bill Nottingham, I have moved all ace-* modules into a subpackge. The chaneged srpm and spec file are below: Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace-0.0.3-4.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint is clean builds in koji on f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=857555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:10:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463236] Review Request: ACE PHP module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021910.m92JA5Vp016113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463236 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:10:04 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463235] Review Request: ACE Mysql module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021910.m92JAZNj016282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463235 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:10:34 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463241] Review Request: ACE Postgres module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021909.m92J9YZ5015774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463241 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:09:33 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:11:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463232] Review Request: ACE Console Module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021911.m92JBF13013329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463232 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:11:14 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:12:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463229] Review Request: ACE Banners Module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021912.m92JCTYT016553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463229 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:12:28 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463227] Review Request: ACE Apache module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021913.m92JD7cR013607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463227 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:13:06 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 19:11:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 15:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463231] Review Request: ACE Basic Site Module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810021911.m92JBmTf013454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463231 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-02 15:11:47 EDT --- Combining this package into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 20:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 16:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810022020.m92KKm9L030208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-02 16:20:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Everything seems fine, except for setting a vendor_id in the desktop-install. > Please fix that too and I'll approve the package. Found it, it's in a irc log: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Minutes20080603#t12:15 rdieter: abadger1999: ah, I had almost forgotten about that. iirc, mclassen kinda wanted the the .desktop file --vendor recommendations changed to *not* recommend using --vendor=fedora Who can change the Wiki Package Guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 21:05:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461793] Review Request: spu-gcc - Cross Compiling GNU GCC targeted at spu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810022105.m92L5hT3012657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461793 --- Comment #2 from Aidan Delaney 2008-10-02 17:05:42 EDT --- Jochen and I considered two methods of breaking the circularity concerning building spu-gcc and spu-newlib. The problem is that spu-gcc needs spu-newlib during build, whereas spu-newlib needs spu-gcc during its build. The two ways of solving this are (a) do a build on a unified source tree for gcc and newlib, xor (b) provide some bootstrap gcc compiler to build newlib, which can then be used to build spu-gcc. After some investigation we found that (a) is quite brittle. None of the configurations of gcc+newlib (that we tried) build in a unified tree. Therefore we have opted for (b). A simple spu-gcc-bootstrap is available here: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/~balor/rpm/spu-gcc/r1/spu-gcc-bootstrap.spec and a spu-gcc which conflicts with spu-gcc-bootstrap is available here: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/~balor/rpm/spu-gcc/r1/spu-gcc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 21:09:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461791] Review Request: spu-newlib - C library targeted at spu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810022109.m92L9KW4010467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461791 --- Comment #2 from Aidan Delaney 2008-10-02 17:09:18 EDT --- This updated version of spu-newlib builds using the spu-gcc-bootstrap compiler provided by bug #461793: http://foss.it.brighton.ac.uk/~balor/rpm/spu-newlib/r1/spu-newlib.spec spu-newlib is then a BuildRequires of spu-gcc. This breaks a problem with circular dependencies in the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 21:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 17:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] New: Review Request: anyconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect V{N Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: anyconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect V{N https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Summary: Review Request: anyconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect V{N Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at infradead.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/anyconnect.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/anyconnect-f9/anyconnect-0.91-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a client for Cisco's "AnyConnect" VPN, which uses HTTPS and DTLS protocols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 22:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810022210.m92MAVQ3026005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-02 18:10:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I guess I've already invalidated the documentation somewhat by moving the > README*, FONT* and similar files to defaultdocdir. The manual pages refers to > these as /usr/share/ttf2pt1/README etc. But this feels a bit more invasive. > > Or is it part of packaging to actually rewrite the documentation for the > package? It is better for integration, but at some point you can also decide that it is not needed and you have better things to do, not to mention that it increases complexity. So, your choice. > > It would be better if convert looked for convert.cfg somewhere > > else than in pwd. > > Maybe, maybe not. It describes what "convert" should do, and in that sense has > some similarities with a Makefile. There may be several such files, each > converting different sources. Reading the sample it looks more like a regular config file. So a search path in /usr/share/.... then /etc/.... then $HOME/... and then the current directory with the latter overriding the former would be better. But this is to be done with upstream. > But in any case, I wouldn't change such a thing in the role of packager, would > I? That seems like a discussion to have with upstreams if one want to change > it. Indeed. > Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1.spec > SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1-3.4.4-5.src.rpm I think that the 'other' applications should better be installed they look generic enough to be of use. However they should certainly have their name prefixed with ttf2pt1 to avoid polluting the global namespace with the names that are not very well chosen, and for utilities that are not very important. cmpf and dmpf could also be prefixed, a 4 letter name is not very good, and in any case one has to look at te ttf2pt1 documentation to see what tey are useful to, and the other utilities are already prefixed. The stuff in TeX is not generic enough, in my opinion, to be put in the system dirs, leaving it in %doc is right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 2 22:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 18:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] New: Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Summary: Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/chntpw.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/chntpw-0.99.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is a utility to (re)set the password of any user that has a valid (local) account on your Windows NT/2k/XP/Vista etc system. You do not need to know the old password to set a new one. It works offline, that is, you have to shutdown your computer and boot off a floppydisk or CD or another system. Will detect and offer to unlock locked or disabled out user accounts! There is also a registry editor and other registry utilities that works under linux/unix, and can be used for other things than password editing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 00:48:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] New: Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Summary: Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon-7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Moon activity for the sugar desktop Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=858272 One error in rpmlint: Empty File One warning in rpmlint: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities I am requesting sponsorship via anohter ticket. So it is a race condition between this ticket and that as to if I will require sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 00:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] New: Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-mail.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-mail-1.41-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle Depends on bouncycastle-%{version} which is in koji and will be in rawhide shortly. The spec file is directly taken from bouncycastle and modified accordingly. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:01:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:01:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030401.m9341mUs030304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-03 00:01:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=858406 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 08f1bb21c5204669b3fd3bac1136d3e8 mg_MG.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030403.m9343sem030587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-03 00:03:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=858402 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. a22266cfa40fb23a79be27a239321a3f km_spellchecker_OOo30_V_1.0.2.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:02:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] Review Request: Armenian hunspell dictionaries - Armenian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030402.m9342n7E030434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-03 00:02:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=858404 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 7ca1904aecf53163909ced527663a2ef myspell-hy-0.10.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030405.m9345qP2027584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 00:05:51 EDT --- Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". Maybe after f10 we should consider revising the fonts packaging naming guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:19:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226592] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030419.m934JKwf001021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226592 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.hutterer at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Hutterer 2008-10-03 00:19:19 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xorg-x11-drv-evdev New Branches: F-10 Owners: xgl-maint Please create F-10 branch for stabilization work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:16:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:16:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030416.m934G3nv000689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-03 00:16:02 EDT --- Suggestions:- 1)Source failed to verify with upstream URL 8e60459257b6ec5d43ad34b5cd330a8f publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from upstream URL) 2c02784aa82bb23498d9b8f07654ab1d publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from SRPM) Re upload SRPM with correct source tarball. 2) from Packaging Guidelines, consider preserving timestamps http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps 3) good if you use defattr usage as %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:22:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226654] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030422.m934McTZ030715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226654 Peter Hutterer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |peter.hutterer at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Peter Hutterer 2008-10-03 00:22:37 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xorg-x11-xkb-utils New Branches: F-10 Owners: xgl-maint Please create F-10 branch for stabilization work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030447.m934li69006890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #6 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-03 00:47:43 EDT --- rpmlint ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.i386.rpm ume-launcher.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/ume-launcher.desktop 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The warning is ok and can be ignored. (. not checked, * = ok, X = not OK) * Package is matching naming guidelines. * spec file in named %{name}.spec * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible have the right good license shortname : LGPLv2+ * License file must be in %doc (it it exists) * Spec file is written in American English * Spec file is legible. X Sources match upstream. MD5SUM: f9699b350edd71acf727411cf7d0b287 rpmbuild/SOURCES/ume-launcher_0.6.3.tar.gz a9b58c94a1c4c0d59018ff14f4e3aa34 Download/ume-launcher_0.6.3.tar.gz * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{?dist} is used * license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager/Vendor/Distribution/Copyright tags not used * Summary tag does not end in a period * Package compiles and build into RPM's on : i386 etc. * no Exclude Arch * BuildRequires for all build requerements (- the ones on the Exception list) * locales are handed using %find_lang * no shared libs * Package own all created directories. * No duplicate files in %files * Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line * Package has a %clean with a rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * consistently use of macros * Package contains code or or permissable content. * No large documentation * files in %doc dont affect runtime. * no header files * no static libs * package has no pkgconfig (.pc) files * no -devel subpackage * no ..la libtool archives * gui application, desktop-file-validate is used on .desktop file * package don't own files and dirs owned by other packages. * %install starts with an rm -rf %{buildroot} * rpm package filenames is in valid UTF-8. * no Rpath * no config files * no init scripts * no %makeinstall used * no Requires(pre,post) * rpmlint is ok on SRPM * rpmlint is ok on RPM's. Fix the sources and i will approve it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 04:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030448.m934mNLm003232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 00:48:21 EDT --- Please bump the upstream version (eg to 0.4.1 or 0.5) when changing the tarball to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209617] Review Request: comix - A user-friendly, customizable image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030501.m9351lhU006136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209617 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 01:01:46 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:15:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030515.m935FVn5008506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 01:15:30 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Open Publication [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. please see above comments [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [=] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. see above: (-,root,root,-) is preferred [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. (it wouldn't hurt to add a macro say %publicandir for %{_datadir}/publican though maybe would probably come first in the other publican packages) [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Please fix the earlier mentioned points and I think the package can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030516.m935Glg6008748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030532.m935WOUD014840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com | |, petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:39:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 209617] Review Request: comix - A user-friendly, customizable image viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030539.m935dLBh012289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209617 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030542.m935gPbL016409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220443] Review Request: gnome-commander - A nice and fast file manager for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030542.m935gBgP012977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220443 --- Comment #5 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 01:42:10 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030552.m935qOYG018120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 --- Comment #22 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 01:52:23 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:55:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030555.m935tOAO018975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030555.m935tD4H015180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 01:55:12 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442371] Review Request: collectd - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030552.m935qfoQ014585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442371 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030600.m9360UCV020171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #49 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 02:00:28 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030557.m935vf2N019407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 01:57:39 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030557.m935vqZJ015851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 05:57:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030557.m935vIq9015739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #74 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 01:57:16 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030604.m9364gDg020542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 02:04:41 EDT --- elfinfo-1.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/elfinfo-1.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030606.m93668eD017605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 02:06:07 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030603.m9363hrP016939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 --- Comment #27 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 02:03:43 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030601.m9361Unm016713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 02:01:29 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:06:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030606.m93667ei017576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 02:06:06 EDT --- greadelf-0.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/greadelf-0.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:03:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461305] Review Request: pam_kcoda - coda auth/cred/session PAM module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030603.m9363t1G016978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461305 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225746] Merge Review: fedora-release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030607.m9367A8D021228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225746 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:09:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030609.m9369MEX021401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ismael at olea.org) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 02:09:21 EDT --- F-10 final freeze is approaching. Please import this (and related packages) as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:10:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030610.m936AOCT021887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(trausche at fedorapr | |oject.org) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 02:10:23 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460867] Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936BMbs022114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 --- Comment #17 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 02:11:21 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030614.m936ELgT022324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 02:14:21 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936B2WO022075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |461139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:15:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030615.m936F0Zd022395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:14:59 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319318) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319318) Thabit-fonts.spec-1.patch Bit more cleanup now that Mothanna-fonts is going to be a separate package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936B1up022050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462711 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:10:59 EDT --- Strictly this doesn't block bug 462711 (Mothanna-fonts review) but in practice probably most of the changes to this packaging will need to be done for the other package too, so making it block. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460867] Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936BWm8018492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458660] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936BgAj018548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:14:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030614.m936EWIv018762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936BiJt018589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Bug 458661 depends on bug 458660, which changed state. Bug 458660 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458653] Review Request: perl-Devel-PerlySense - Perl IDE backend with Emacs frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030611.m936BhNL018569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458653 Bug 458653 depends on bug 458660, which changed state. Bug 458660 Summary: Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458660 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: anyconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030620.m936KIkg023626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: anyconnect |Review Request: anyconnect |-- client for Cisco |-- client for Cisco |AnyConnect V{N |AnyConnect VPN -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030619.m936JQ5w019726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|461139 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:19:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030619.m936JOWf019701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|462711 | --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:19:24 EDT --- rpmlint says: Thabit-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/Thabit-fonts-0.02/OFL.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030621.m936Lt6B023841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:21:54 EDT --- Well comment 12 is after fixing rpmlint warning for ver-rel tagging syntax in the changelog: %changelog -* Mon Sep 08 2008 Subhodip Biswas -0.02-3 -- Packaged seperatly as Thabit and Mothana. -* Tue Sep 02 2008 Subhodip Biswas -0.02-2 +* Mon Sep 08 2008 Subhodip Biswas - 0.02-3 +- Packaged seperately as Thabit and Mothana. + +* Tue Sep 02 2008 Subhodip Biswas - 0.02-2 - Submit for review. + * Fri Aug 29 2008 Khaled Hosny - 0.02-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030624.m936OIGt020562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462711 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030624.m936OIOl020587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |461139 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:26:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:26:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030626.m936QfaY024728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 02:26:40 EDT --- Made this depend on Thabit-fonts review (bug 461139) since the packaging is very similar: so I suggest best to finish that review first to avoid duplicate review work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455050] Review Request: padauk-fonts - Padauk font for Burmese and the Myanmar script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030631.m936VYXK022172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455050 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |petersen at redhat.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:46:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:46:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460867] Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030646.m936kVQM024635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030646.m936kWnV024660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Bug 457517 depends on bug 460867, which changed state. Bug 460867 Summary: Review Request: perl-ORLite - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific ORM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460867 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030648.m936m6YR024792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-03 02:48:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-km Short Description: Khmer hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:49:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030649.m936n19s024907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e-, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-03 02:49:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mg Short Description: Malagasy hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] Review Request: hunspell-hy - Armenian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030647.m936l0h2024713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Armenian |Review Request: hunspell-hy |hunspell dictionaries - | - Armenian hunspell |Armenian hunspell |dictionaries |dictionaries | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-03 02:46:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-hy Short Description: Armenian hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030654.m936scgB025979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-03 02:54:37 EDT --- Any particuliar reasons for these Requires: Requires: alsa-lib >= 0.9 Requires: qt3 fftw freeglut jack-audio-connection-kit They seem all redundant and superfluous to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030658.m936wCrR029911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449 | --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-03 02:58:11 EDT --- Package is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 06:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 02:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458661] Review Request: perl-Graph-Easy-As_svg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030657.m936vAQf026660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458661 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 02:57:09 EDT --- Since perl-Graph-Easy is a dependency and its review ticket has been abandoned, this most be closed as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464171] Review Request: gedit-latex-plugin - Gedit plugin for composing and compiling LaTeX documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030704.m93742eC031055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464171 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:51:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030751.m937pLoK005165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 03:51:20 EDT --- Suggest to target rawhide and F-9 initially - can worry about F8 later. (Not sure why there would be a difference for that between f8 and f9 though.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030752.m937q9NQ005356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 03:52:08 EDT --- Better would be to suggest to upstream not to use spaces in the top directory name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 07:54:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 03:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030754.m937scu9005664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-03 03:54:37 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre-0.10-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030802.m9382Mfi007975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-03 04:02:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts > in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there > are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses Sorry, could you elaborate on what this means? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030828.m938Smni017859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-03 04:28:47 EDT --- With the sources issue, I'm unsure how to fix it. Upstream call their tarball ume-launcher_0.6.3 but the folder that results when it is extracted is simply called ume-launcher, meaning that on build it fails to change directories correctly. I 'fixed' this by changing the name of the directory to match the tarball, but obviously this isn't a good fix. Is there any other way I can fix it in the spec, or do I need to try and get upstream to change their practice? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030827.m938Rrj7017659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-10-03 04:27:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Sorry for the delay, > There seem to be a couple of problems: > - gpm-devel is needed as BR in order to get a functional mouse (at least on C5) Unfortunately I can't get it working even with BR: gpm-devel (outside of X of course), I'm still getting: GPM_InitMouse() failed: unable to connect to `gpm'. make sure you started `twin' from the console and/or check that `gpm' is running. xterm_InitMouse() failed: this `linux' terminal has no support for xterm-style mouse reporting. I'll try to contact author in order to fix this. > - since you package twsetroot, I suggest including (in %doc) the > README.twsetroot file and maybe setroot.sample too. In the /docs directory > there are also some other files which seem to have interesting content > (diagram.txt, FAQ). Do you have a special reason to not include them in the > final rpm ? No, I'll include them of course, thanks for hint. > And now the real problems: > - twmapscrn is built against the clients/mapscrn folder which seems to contain > a private (old and slightly modified) copy of kbd > (ftp://ftp.win.tue.nl/pub/linux-local/utils/kbd/kbd-1.06.tar.gz), which in turn > is a system package. As usage of private copies of system libs is explicitly > forbidden, I'd say we have an issue here Hm, I just tried to remove twmapscrn and symlink it to the mapscrn provided by kbd -- and it works. I'll do more tests to check whether it really works, but if yes, this would be solution, wouldn't it? > - from the licensing point of view, we have a small mess > a) lots of files have headers defining them as GPLv2+ (good) > b) headers of some other files specifu Public Domain as license (good again) > c) however there are several files ( for instance clients/threadtest.c and > many files under /lib ) which have no license specified. What reason can we > invoke in order to assume that they are like all the others, Public Domain or > GPLv2+ ? > In addition to that, the sourcefarge page of the project > (http://sourceforge.net/projects/twin/) claims that the project is licensed as > GPL and LGPL, but LGPL is only mentioned in the source through the presence of > the standard LGPL license file; I have not been able to locate any other trace > of it. Public Domain + GPLv2+ = no problem, but the presence of files with no > specific license make me ask for help. Anyone more experienced in licensing > willing to shed some light ? CC'ing Tom Callaway: do we have to ask upstream to specify license in each file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030829.m938Tqph014662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-03 04:29:51 EDT --- The tests should be switched off for inclusion, because it needs graphic. I've also problem with one test and I reported this into upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 08:45:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 04:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030845.m938jnTi022198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-03 04:45:48 EDT --- ref: gpm: waiting for solution. docs: excellent, thanks twmapscrn: of course, as long as you make sure all the deps are required/buildrequired. license: waiting for advices -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030913.m939DutA029174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-03 05:13:55 EDT --- For the moment the rule I see is "If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as ." As soon as it is changed I promise to approve the package. I suggest pinging the packaging committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030937.m939btuS001351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 05:37:54 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] Review Request: hunspell-hy - Armenian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030939.m939dFpd001503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 05:39:14 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:36:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030936.m939aQPJ001178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 05:36:25 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:38:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030938.m939c7T8001396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] Review Request: hunspell-hy - Armenian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030939.m939dPhw030781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030936.m939aguD030475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030947.m939lH9f003247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206487] Review Request: jd - A 2ch browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030946.m939krKQ032423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206487 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-03 05:46:52 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 09:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 05:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810030952.m939qnfT000995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-03 05:52:48 EDT --- Use %setup -q -n ume-launcher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031007.m93A7a4A004276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-10-03 06:07:35 EDT --- Huzaifa, the summary in pkgdb contains a small typo: ightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications The 'L' character in 'Lightweight' is missing. Could you please fix this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031015.m93AFqhs009014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-03 06:15:51 EDT --- Ping. Is there any progress on this? Do you need any help with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465177] Review Request: hunspell-km - Khmer hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031022.m93AM06B007209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465177 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:22:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465179] Review Request: hunspell-mg - Malagasy hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031022.m93AMOP7007290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465179 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465176] Review Request: hunspell-hy - Armenian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031021.m93ALVOC007107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465176 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 10:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 06:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464757] Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031032.m93AWZkm009384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464757 --- Comment #5 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-03 06:32:34 EDT --- Fixed tspi library handling so it doesn't depend on trousers-devel, but only on trousers, and that dependency is picked up properly by RPM. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine-0.4.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 11:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031120.m93BKMdC021400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-03 07:20:20 EDT --- Should be fixed now. SPEC: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ume-launcher.spec SRPM: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 11:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031139.m93BdKDF022078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #27 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-03 07:39:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Some notes: > > * EVR > - At least EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) needs fixing: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages Fixed. > * configure > - Doesn't the following work? Duh, much simpler. Thanks. > * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names > - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired. > Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so > on), > which is rather a blocker. > Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name, > for > example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed. The problem is that GROMACS has a big bunch of independent analysis tools that users need, all of which must be in the system path. I renamed highway, luck, sigeps and wheel to g_highway, g_luck, g_sigeps and g_wheel. I used autoreconf to regenerate the scripts. I don't have access to the buildsystem yet, so I can't check whether it works on F10. > * Duplicate files Thanks, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 11:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031148.m93BmsSE027372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-03 07:48:53 EDT --- rpmlint output: gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs gromacs-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 11:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 07:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031146.m93Bkjs7027055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #28 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-03 07:46:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Some more notes: > > * Directory ownership issue Thanks. > * ldconfig > - Why does -devel package call /sbin/ldconfig? It shouldn't. > * Summary > ---------------------------------------------------- > %package devel > Summary: Header files and static libraries for GROMACS > ---------------------------------------------------- > - What does "static" libraries mean here? Whoops, there are no more static libraries. Just .so files in the devel packages. > * Using %_builddir > ----------------------------------------------------- > # Install manual > install -c -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{_builddir}/gromacs-4.0_rc2/ > ----------------------------------------------------- > - "install -cpm 0644 %{SOURCE1} ." is sufficient. Much simpler. Thanks for the tip. Spec file & SRPM available at http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 12:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031214.m93CEKkf000742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982 Bruno Cornec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno_cornec at hp.com --- Comment #12 from Bruno Cornec 2008-10-03 08:14:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > In order to make tracking easier for everyone, please bump the release tag each > time you modify the spec file (and _add_ a corresponding changelog entry, not > _replace_ the previous one as you have done). For instance > Ok, the next one is -3 now so. > %changelog > * Thu Oct 02 2008 Bruno Cornec 1.19-2.fc9 > - fix compilation flags > > * Sat Sep 20 2008 Bruno Cornec 1.19-1.fc9 > - Updated to 1.19 Ok. Will try to do that properly for -3 tag. In fact I have a fake changelog I generate for test packages, and a real one for official packages. Now we are approaching that step, it makes sense. > as of 02.oct.2008, ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec still > has the missing "s" in Summary(fr). My mistake, I wasn't looking at the right line. For my own knowledge what is the tool you're using for conformity checking. I just know rpmlint. What else exists ? > > I will take a look at your other packages and if satisfied I will sponsor you. Thanks. So new versions available at: ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 12:39:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031239.m93CdtFd004141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-10-03 08:39:54 EDT --- First impressions: - The patch 'judy-1.0.4-smp.patch' isn't applied - There's a comment in the .spec file mentioning '# _smp_mflags not works, reporte at BZ #2129019'. Bug #2129019 isn't known at this bugzilla. Where can it be found and is it still open? - There's a typo in the .spec file: %post -p /sbn/ldconfig. This should be /sbin/ldconfig - The %files contains files using wildcards. While this is valid, it is recommended to use the full filenames for readability. Full review coming soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 13:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031301.m93D1VrF010626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-03 09:01:29 EDT --- Hi. I am using mod_perl-2.0.4-6.x86_64 httpd-2.2.9-4.x86_64 and I receiving the flowing error. [root at localhost ~]# service httpd restart Stopping httpd: [FAILED] Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 209 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Syntax error on line 10 of /etc/httpd/conf.d/perl.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_perl.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_perl.so: undefined symbol: modperl_io_perlio_restore_stdout [FAILED] Can you help with this issue, or Can I open a new bug report ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 13:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031319.m93DJlcR019137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-03 09:19:46 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #1) > > Description probably needs some more love -- the fact > > that the package is free doesn't need to be mentioned there (redundant, see > > License tag) and "X windows" is correctly spelled without the trailing "s" and > > with "w" capitablized: "X Window", "X Window System", or just "X11". > > Yep, sorry for that, I've just copied and pasted it from the author's webpages. Similarly to %description, I suggest you change the Comment= in .desktop file to somthing more sensible (such as "Utility that analyzes the system of lenses" (may apply to Summary as well): Comment=OpticalRayTracer is a free (GPL) Linux (Xwindows GUI-based) utility that analyzes systems of lenses.(In reply to comment #2) This is definitely not a blocker though. > This is now not necessary anymore thanks to fast upstream reaction. Also, my > patch for 64bit systems has been merged and new version released (how nice!:). Thanks for that! > > What's "%{_datadir}/apps"? Would not "%{_datadir}/raytracer" be more > > appropriate? In case not, please ensure you depend on the package that creates > > it or own it. > > %{_datadir}/apps/raytracer/ > > Look like a standard path for KDE apps. It should be ok as opticalraytracer > depends on kdelibs3 which in turn depends on kde-filesystem which owns > %{datadir}/apps. The same applies for %{docdir}/HTML/en where newly some files > are stored too. > > Note: rpmlint is silent on spec file and SRPM, but not on RPMs: > > >rpmlint -i opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm > opticalraytracer.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink > /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/raytracer/common ../common > The relative symbolic link points nowhere. > > I don't know whether I can avoid this somehow, the pointed directory is owned > by kdelibs-common which is also a dependency of kdelibs3, hence this shouldn't > be IMHO a problem. That's fine then. The package looks perfect now; thanks and sorry for the delay; APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 13:31:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 09:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031331.m93DV8Rj018177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 09:31:07 EDT --- Some notes: * Macros - Defining %_prefix is not needed - jobs is not defined on Fedora. Also please support parallel make if possible: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - %distname is not defined. * SourceURL - must be written with full URL. For sourceforge hosted tarball, please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * BuildRoot - does not honor Fedora packagig guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * Compilation flags - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. You can check what compilation flags are used by $ rpm --eval %optflags https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags - Also compilation flag "-Os" supersedes "-O2" flag in %optflags so please remove this. * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files. * Desktop file - When using only basename of the icon file is used for Icon entry removing suffix is preferred: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * %clean - The part "[ -d %{buildroot} -a "%{buildroot}" != "" ] && " is not needed * Inconsistent usage of %buildroot vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Please choose one and not use both * %defattr - We recommend to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 14:12:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031412.m93ECVRU027928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 James Antill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from James Antill 2008-10-03 10:12:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python New Branches: F-10 Owners: james katzj -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 14:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031418.m93EIrHs000947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-03 10:18:51 EDT --- ??? Shouldn't ownership be changed in pkgdb? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 14:43:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031443.m93EhYQK006215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 10:43:33 EDT --- Okay. for now I will accept this package (I cannot try Sun's Java for now...) -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tuxguitar) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 14:43:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 10:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] New: Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 Summary: Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: luca at foppiano.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lfoppiano.fedorapeople.org/symbolic.spec SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/symbolic/symbolic-1.2.0-12.fc9.src.rpm Description: Symbolic is a web application which aim to simplify the management within complex enterprise infrastructures. Symbolic is designed as front-end of Fedora Unified Network Controller (Func - http://fedorahosted.org/func) and allow to manage a huge quantity of machines, networks and environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 15:08:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] New: Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-nds.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-nds-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Lowlands Saxon dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 15:07:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] New: Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hsb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-hsb-0.20060327.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 15:09:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] New: Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-rw.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-rw-0.20050109-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:04:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031604.m93G4EIl024047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 12:04:13 EDT --- Some notes: * License - As far as I check the source codes the license tag should be "LGPLv3+". * SourceURL - For tarballs hosted by sourceforge, please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net * Requires - GlobalPlatform.h contains: ------------------------------------------------ 44 #include 45 #include "unicode.h" 46 #include ------------------------------------------------ So -devel package should have "Requires: pcsc-lite-devel" ! By the way it may be preferable that you provide pkgconfig file for globalplatform-devel package because winscard.h is not under %_includedir but under %_includedir/PCSC so to use header files in globalplatform-devel you have to add $(pkg-config --cflags libpcsclite) to CFLAGS. * Documents - Please consider to add the following file(s) to %doc: ------------------------------------------------ AUTHORS ------------------------------------------------ * Timestamps - Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} CPPROG="cp -p" ------------------------------------------------ to keep timestamps on installed header files? This method usually works for Makefiles using install-sh when installing files. * %files entry - build log shows: ------------------------------------------------ 521 Processing files: globalplatform-devel-5.0.0-1.fc10 522 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/GlobalPlatform/GlobalPlatform.h 523 warning: File listed twice: /usr/include/GlobalPlatform/unicode.h ------------------------------------------------ %files entry ------------------------------------------------ %files %{_includedir}/GlobalPlatform/ ------------------------------------------------ contains the directory %_includedir/GlobalPlatform itself and all files/directories/etc under the directory, so the following ------------------------------------------------ %{_includedir}/GlobalPlatform/* ------------------------------------------------ entry is not needed. If you want to list only the directory %_includedir/GlobalPlatform, use ------------------------------------------------ %dir %{_includedir}/GlobalPlatform/ ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031608.m93G8JBt026980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |tuxguitar Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-03 12:08:19 EDT --- Thank you very much ! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tuxguitar Short Description: A multitrack tablature editor and player Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:08:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031608.m93G8H3u025442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #5 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-03 12:08:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please bump the upstream version (eg to 0.4.1 or 0.5) when changing the tarball > to avoid confusion. There will be no confusion, this RPM wasn't released yet, so IMHO I just need to take official 0.4 source tarball. The difference is only uids and timestamps, b/c for uploaded RPM I did make dist in svn repo myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031613.m93GDkka028009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 12:13:45 EDT --- Just noting that the maintainer of ppl on Fedora is also the upstream developer of ppl, so he actually knows pre31 (currently) is released. It may be that he has some reason he doesn't want to import pre tarball into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:16:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031616.m93GGuEL028886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 --- Comment #5 from James Antill 2008-10-03 12:16:54 EDT --- The owner in pkgdb is james (me) ... what's the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:19:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031619.m93GJtm5029149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #4 from Dodji Seketeli 2008-10-03 12:19:54 EDT --- @Mamoru: Yes, I know that. I just needed to have a packaged version of ppl 10pre to actually be able to _build_ cloog, and maybe ease the process of review of cloog for those who might be willing to review of me. Cloog needs those versions of ppl. And I need a clood to be able to build/package gcc from trunk. It was not my intent to rush the ppl maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 15:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 11:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461307] Review Request: perl-Software-License Packages that provide templated software licenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031557.m93FvTOM024496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461307 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-03 11:57:28 EDT --- Built into rawhide.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:30:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031630.m93GU1KE030164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-03 12:30:00 EDT --- I saw that. I misread the request. I thought it was an ownership change or some stripe, I totally missed the New Branch for F-10. Ignore. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031632.m93GWHmf030703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 12:32:15 EDT --- I still don't understand how the Summary: helps to clarify much of anything, but upstream seems to prefer humor over useful documentation so what can we do? Maybe consider "Lighter version of the Moose object system", but I don't think it should hold up approval of this package. Otherwise everything looks fine to me. * source files match upstream: e075052ab45008e512d78dd340ed62b55923a0faf124887088869b1ae5aa7eaa Mouse-0.09.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Mouse) = 0.09 perl(Mouse::Meta::Attribute) perl(Mouse::Meta::Class) perl(Mouse::Meta::Role) perl(Mouse::Object) perl(Mouse::Role) perl(Mouse::Tiny) perl(Mouse::TypeRegistry) perl(Mouse::Util) perl(Squirrel) perl(Squirrel::Role) perl-Mouse = 0.09-1.fc10 = perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Method::Modifiers) >= 1.01 perl(MRO::Compat) >= 0.09 perl(Mouse::Meta::Attribute) perl(Mouse::Meta::Class) perl(Mouse::Meta::Role) perl(Mouse::Object) perl(Mouse::TypeRegistry) perl(Mouse::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) >= 1.19 perl(Test::Exception) >= 0.27 perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=46, Tests=2160, 3 wallclock secs * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:44:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031644.m93Gi6aB001979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-03 12:44:04 EDT --- Much better: a9b58c94a1c4c0d59018ff14f4e3aa34 Download/ume-launcher_0.6.3.tar.gz a9b58c94a1c4c0d59018ff14f4e3aa34 rpmbuild/SOURCES/ume-launcher_0.6.3.tar.gz Hint: Remember to bump the release when making changes to the spec. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031649.m93GnAxt002923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031650.m93GoKSC003479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:46:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226342] Merge Review: python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031646.m93GkbHO002722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 12:46:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:48:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031648.m93GmsA1002879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-10-03 12:48:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review (the .desktop and summary will be updated of course)! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: opticalraytracer Short Description: Utility that analyzes systems of lenses Owners: mjakubicek Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mmahut -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:52:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031652.m93Gq5bD001939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 12:52:04 EDT --- I don't see you in the packager group. What's your FAS ID? Do you need a sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:54:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:54:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226654] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xkb-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031654.m93Gs9JH002199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 12:54:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031657.m93Gv67H004993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-03 12:57:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Suggestions:- > 1)Source failed to verify with upstream URL > 8e60459257b6ec5d43ad34b5cd330a8f publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from upstream URL) > 2c02784aa82bb23498d9b8f07654ab1d publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz (from SRPM) > Re upload SRPM with correct source tarball. when I did initial SRPM, upstream tarball was not uploaded yet, so I ran make dist in svn myself, actual diff is uids and timestamps only > 2) from Packaging Guidelines, consider preserving timestamps > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Timestamps considerd, note there are files generated during the build which will have build-time timestamps > 3) good if you use defattr usage as > %defattr(-,root,root,-) changed, although %defattr(-,root,root) is semantically the same -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031702.m93H2Z5k004840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:02:33 EDT --- Now the srpm link in comment #10 is invalid and there's been no response in over three months. Setting needinfo; I will close this ticket soon if there's no further response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031659.m93GxbpO003664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 12:59:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 16:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031657.m93Gvt2R003383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 12:57:53 EDT --- cvs done. Feel free to request more branches in another request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031700.m93H0JSM004130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:00:18 EDT --- This failed to build in mock for me: Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 15, in from __init__ import __version__ File "/builddir/build/BUILD/gnuplot-py-1.8/__init__.py", line 165, in from PlotItems import PlotItem, Func, File, Data, GridData File "/builddir/build/BUILD/gnuplot-py-1.8/PlotItems.py", line 24, in import numpy ImportError : No module named numpy Are you sure you don't need BuildRequires: numpy? Can you post a link to a successful scratch build of a package that doesn't have it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:09:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458617] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-synaptics - Xorg X11 synaptics input driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031709.m93H9dSV008003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458617 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 13:09:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:08:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031708.m93H8CY8007711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 13:08:10 EDT --- Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:09:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031709.m93H9aKS007963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:09:35 EDT --- Marking this as not being ready for review; please clear the whiteboard when it is ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243211] Review Request: chestnut-dialer - PPP (Point to Point Protocol) dialing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031708.m93H8cTL007794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243211 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:08:37 EDT --- It's been sixteen months with no response; I think it's well past time this was closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031713.m93HDoGQ008993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:13:48 EDT --- You can do as many scratch builds in koji as you like, though. You don't actually need to have a local mock installation at home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251071] Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031712.m93HC5Fr006802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251071 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(law at redhat.com) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:12:03 EDT --- It's been well over a year since David's comment with no response, and as far as I know the whole stateless server thing has been abandoned. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though. Setting needinfo; I'll close this ticket soon if there's no further activity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:21:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031721.m93HL3eJ008688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:21:00 EDT --- The src.rpm in comment #20 fails to build in rawhide; it uses Patch0: but applies it with %patch instead of %patch0, which doesn't work in the current rpm. Fixing that, I guess the build is expected to fail on the call to /bin/sh -x /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform SDK /usr/share/eclipse Is there a package which builds on rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031723.m93HNVJk011075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pm at datasphere.ch) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 13:23:29 EDT --- Patrick, sorry. It seems that I missed your last reply for about 3 months. Would you still want to import this package into Fedora? If so I will recheck your latest srpm later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:25:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031725.m93HPRmG009738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alcapcom at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:25:26 EDT --- This fails to build for me on current rawhide: /bin/sh -x /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform SDK /usr/share/eclipse cdt /bin/sh: /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform: No such file or directory I gather there's another way to do this these days. Did you still want to submit this package? Would you post one that builds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] New: Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Summary: Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext-2.1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: iText is a library that allows you to generate PDF files on the fly. The iText classes are very useful for people who need to generate read-only, platform independent documents containing text, lists, tables and images. The library is especially useful in combination with Java(TM) technology-based Servlets: The look and feel of HTML is browser dependent; with iText and PDF you can control exactly how your servlet's output will look. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This package had licensing problems in the past ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176981 and especially https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236309 ) which seem to be resolved according to the upstream author. The story can be found in the core/com/lowagie/text/misc_licenses.txt file inside the tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:27:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031727.m93HRqlU010271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |465203, 465382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031731.m93HVCI7012992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 13:31:11 EDT --- I don't see you in the packager group; in fact, it doesn't seem as if you've completed the CLA yet. Setting NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031734.m93HYwuZ012387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #7 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-03 13:34:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > [=] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. updated spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/publican-ovirt.spec SRPM URL: http://apevec.fedorapeople.org/publican-ovirt-0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:27:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031727.m93HRsZS010303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031740.m93HejIu015710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #11 from jebba 2008-10-03 13:40:44 EDT --- Removed Requires: per #10, at version fmit-0.97.7-3.fc9 ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226592] Merge Review: xorg-x11-drv-evdev In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031742.m93HgFfl016001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226592 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 13:42:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 17:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031742.m93HgL2B014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #1 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-03 13:42:20 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mnemosyne.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/mnemosyne-1.1.1-2.r1.fc9.src.rpm Updated to latest release (upstream fixed a small issue I reported). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031807.m93I72Ai022174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-03 14:07:01 EDT --- Oops! Yes, BuildRequires numpy is needed, sorry Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py-1.8-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031823.m93INoTY025832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 14:23:49 EDT --- tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:23:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031823.m93INDam025683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 14:23:11 EDT --- One more thing from me: ------------------------------ install -c -m 644 ... ------------------------------ - Use "install -c -p -m 644" to keep timestamps. For other things, if Dominik think this package can be approved I won't oppose it anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031823.m93INk6E024183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 14:23:45 EDT --- tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:25:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463791] Review Request: compat-db45 - The Berkeley DB database compatibility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031825.m93IPY6b024824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463791 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 14:25:32 EDT --- A couple of issues/questions: I don't see the point in the obsoletes of ancient db versions being in this compat package. Honestly I don't see the point of them being in the base db package (since we don't support upgrades from any release which would have them and there is probably never been a Fedora release that had them) but that's a different review ticket. I have no idea what yum would do with an unversioned non-provided obsolete that appears in more than one package, but it's probably not something we want to worry about. I can't actually install these packages since they conflict with the existing compat-db package which is a rather essential system component. I'm not sure how I could actually do that without composing a new OS tree so I'm just not going to worry about it. What's the point of the -devel package? I was under the impression that we didn't want -devel packages for compat libraries, and the existing compat-db package doesn't have one. What happens to the /usr/bin/db45* executables and /usr/bin/berkeley_db45_svc? After this split, what becomes of the db 4.3 stuff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031830.m93IUSaN027766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 Anders Kaseorg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anders at kaseorg.com --- Comment #29 from Anders Kaseorg 2008-10-03 14:30:27 EDT --- Ksplice 0.9.1 was released on 2008-09-26. It includes the zlib patch, and other important fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:30:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444933] Review Request: cairo-dock - Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031830.m93IUODi026153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444933 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 14:30:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: cairo-dock New Branches: F-10 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031837.m93IbPML029153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 14:37:24 EDT --- Thanks. After F-8/9 tuxguitar are pushed to testing, when you think they can be moved to stable please modify (edit) the submitted push requests. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031852.m93IqYJR030836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 14:52:33 EDT --- You could use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep header files timestamps. You could do make check in %check. rpmlint output is ignorable: xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation I'd propose a shorter summary: Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb And for the devel summary I propose: Development and header files for xcb-util There is a license issue, wm/reply_formats.c notice refers to COPYING which isn't present. In rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la, the -r is not needed. And the -f isn't needeed too, I prefer personnally being warned when a file I had to remove isn't present anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 18:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 14:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031859.m93IxZKn001001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-03 14:59:33 EDT --- Nope. Licensing issues not resolved. Still has: * You acknowledge that this software is not designed or intended for * use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any * nuclear facility. in: src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/LZWDecoder.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/TIFFFaxDecoder.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/PngImage.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/TIFFDirectory.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/BmpImage.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/TIFFField.java src/core/com/lowagie/text/pdf/codec/TIFFLZWDecoder.java That clause is a use-restriction, which makes itext non-free. Blocking FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:04:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031904.m93J49Yu000680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #36 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 15:04:08 EDT --- I can't find libev-devel ?? In rawhide. How comes lua files are not in %_datadir? They are not platform independent? It is a bit strange to have an API for a window manager. Is it because lua is an interpreted language, so that the API has to come with runtime? I think that it is wrong to have: %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default this file should be under the control of upstream/packager. Isn't it possible to override what is there with something in %_sysconfdir? Build stops with -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found I don't have libev-devel, it may be the reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031914.m93JEG8Y004339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-03 15:14:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > One more thing from me: > ------------------------------ > install -c -m 644 ... > ------------------------------ > - Use "install -c -p -m 644" to keep timestamps. Fixed. > For other things, if Dominik think this package can be approved I won't > oppose it anymore. Thanks a lot for your input. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.8.rc2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031917.m93JHUbT005174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lutter at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from David Lutterkort 2008-10-03 15:17:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > This seems to be missing the Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 line mandated by the > guidelines. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby > > It's also missing the explicit build depencency on ruby, although I don't quite > understand the point of that since rubygems should be pulling it in anyway. The explicit 'BR: ruby' for rubygems was unintentional; would be better if FPC revises the wording so that plain ruby packages must have a 'BR: ruby' and rubygem packages a 'BR: rubygems' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031924.m93JOjpo004673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|notting at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-10-03 15:24:44 EDT --- Are you planning to maintain this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031933.m93JX20h008212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 15:33:00 EDT --- I don't see that Artem is in the packager group (or in FAS at all unless my searching skills are lacking) so I'd guess not, but I'll go ahead and set NEEDSPONSOR anyway. The package will need some work before its acceptable, though: awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/ADDENDUM.TXT awesfx.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/midi/GU11-ROM.SF2 awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/GU11-ROM.INS awesfx.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/awesfx-0.5.1c/gu11-rom/GU11-ROM.TXT awesfx.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utility programs for the AWE32/Emu10k1 sound driver. awesfx.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long the AWE32/Emu10k1 sound driver. AWESFX includes asxfload and sfxload, the soundfont awesfx.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL/distributable awesfx-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL/distributable Also, this all seems to conflict with the statement in bug 405131 that awesfx is quite obsolete now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 19:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810031940.m93Jehsq010296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-03 15:40:42 EDT --- I wasn't sure about the words "designed" or "intended". It used to be "licensed" and now it sounds more relaxed. But apparently it still is an issue. I am closing the bug and I'll submit the package to rpmfusion-nonfree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:05:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032005.m93K5tsQ015216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 16:05:54 EDT --- libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032006.m93K6sMf014323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 16:06:53 EDT --- libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032013.m93KDG5n016630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-03 16:13:15 EDT --- Well, wait, let me see what RH Legal thinks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032013.m93KDxTo016748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review- --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-03 16:13:57 EDT --- This is a rather simple package. Unfortunately I'm not terribly well-versed in TeX so it's tough for me to test it, but I ran it over the sample documents and it produced output which makes sense to me. I think I see some UTF-8 issues in the output (it uses ASCII 180 directly in the output when it probably shouldn't) but I don't think that's really a blocker, especially given the age of the code. The only thing rpmlint has to say is: chktex.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chktexrc Shouldn't this file be marked %config? There's actually a small test suite included; you should run it (via "make check" or, since you seem to prefer those long macros, "%{__make} check", in a %check section). It should pass without problems. * source files match upstream: 268b615ed45422adbf4b908898548fea8fa2a5be0a83c976e239b6779a51b691 chktex-1.6.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: chktex = 1.6.4-1.fc10 chktex(x86-64) = 1.6.4-1.fc10 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/perl X %check is not present, but there's a test suite. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032014.m93KEiJI015616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032016.m93KG6b1016226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-03 16:16:05 EDT --- I communicated with the user on IRC, where they indicated they had no desire to maintain this package. Unless they have changed their mind, I suggest we close this NOTABUG. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032016.m93KGqeC016462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:30:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032030.m93KUvCH022196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #33 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-03 16:30:56 EDT --- Excuse me for the deadline. On this day I'm several times try build sim... But I'm do not able tag package on branches except of devel: [pasha at x-www F-9]$ cvs up -dPA cvs update: Updating . [pasha at x-www F-9]$ LANG=C make tag cvs tag -c sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev ERROR: The tag sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev is already applied on a different branch ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev:devel:hubbitus:1222767214 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! make: *** [tag] Error 1 I'm do it by docs - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Tag_Or_Update_Your_Branches and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess Please help me - what I do wrong? (In reply to comment #32) > I still have some comments. > > Instead of %define with_kde, please use bcond_with or bcond_without. You think? I'm do not suppose this for buildtime config. But it seams as good suggestion. I do that. > The kdebase >= 3.0.0 BuildRequires is strange. Shouldn't it be > kdebase-devel >= 3.0.0? And I don't really see the reason why it > shouldn't also be set on fedora > 8? I'm do not remember why I'm write it... May be you a right. But on fedora > 8 it should be kdebase3-devel >= 3.0.0. I add this BR. And now I think over necessity of adding Requires: kdebase... > You should not repeat the summary in the %description. Ok, thanks. > The checkout instructions are not enough, you should add the command > that allows you to do the archive. It seems excessive, but I'm add this. > The line with > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > seems unuseful to me > > And you use $LOCALFLAGS but it is not set?? Removed. But it do have sense. > Remove the # Setup for parallel builds, use instead > make %{?_smp_mflags} Done. > You should not do > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{name}-%{version} > in %clean. Ok. > You install icons, so it is likely that a post script is missing. What script you keep in mind? > Remove the Distribution tag. Removed. Does it make troubles? > Why the BuildRequires autoconf, automake? Because it is SVN build. We > Also remove gcc and gcc-c++ from BuildRequires, please, they are in the > minimal buildroot. Ok. > I also thought that zip was there too, but I am too lazy to check. No, zip is not. See report about it before in this review. > openssl Requires should be picked up automatically. Where it is written? > Some suggestions, feel free not to use these: > > * the TABs look bad in my editor, maybe you could either use only spaces > or use tabs more consistently In my editor (mcedit) my tab look correct. I'm assume convert tabs into spaces for your editor you may by one command, like this: sed -i 's/\t/ /g' sim.spec > * The BuildRequires line that is very long could be split in 2 lines But it is not required, right? > * remove from the description the text: > > SIM has countless features, many of them are listed at: > http://sim-im.berlios.de/ > > since the URL is already a rpm tag. No. This is "historical" text :) I do not want remove them. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/sim/sim-0.9.5-0.7.20080923svn2261rev.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 20:36:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 16:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032036.m93KaIxg023748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-03 16:36:17 EDT --- I talked with RH Legal about it and we're now in agreement that the clause has been effectively altered to be a form of "warranty disclaimer". Lifting FE-Legal, you should be okay from a licensing perspective. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:29:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032129.m93LTu3m002311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #5 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-03 17:29:55 EDT --- Oops, sorry, I pulled the package from rpmfusion. It can be reviewed in here now. And thanks for your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032130.m93LUmGq002708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032137.m93LbDmh005142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #34 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 17:37:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Excuse me for the deadline. On this day I'm several times try build sim... > But I'm do not able tag package on branches except of devel: > [pasha at x-www F-9]$ cvs up -dPA > cvs update: Updating . > > [pasha at x-www F-9]$ LANG=C make tag > cvs tag -c sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev > ERROR: The tag sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev is already applied on a > different branch > ERROR: You can not forcibly move tags between branches > sim-0_9_5-0_6_20080923svn2261rev:devel:hubbitus:1222767214 > cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed > cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! > make: *** [tag] Error 1 %{?dist} is missing !!!! > > Instead of %define with_kde, please use bcond_with or bcond_without. > You think? I'm do not suppose this for buildtime config. But it seams as good > suggestion. I do that. It is much more convenient than plain define. > I'm do not remember why I'm write it... May be you a right. But on fedora > 8 > it should be kdebase3-devel >= 3.0.0. I add this BR. Right. > And now I think over necessity of adding Requires: kdebase... I think not, it should be picked automatically using the soname. > > The checkout instructions are not enough, you should add the command > > that allows you to do the archive. > It seems excessive, but I'm add this. You can do make dist, or tar directly, it should be possible to redo exactly like you. Also it may be possible to recreate configure offline. > > You install icons, so it is likely that a post script is missing. > What script you keep in mind? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache > > Remove the Distribution tag. > Removed. Does it make troubles? It could. And besides this spec is not only for fedora, it is better if it is reusable, be it only in EPEL. And it is at best unuseful. > > Why the BuildRequires autoconf, automake? > Because it is SVN build. We Maybe, but it isn't used during the build? If it is used, I think it is much better to call autoconf/automake/autoreconf explicitly. Looking at the log, it is used during make -f admin/Makefile.common Would certinly be better to call it explicitly, especially since it does strange things, maybe when different versions are installed: + make -f admin/Makefile.common /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken pipe *** automake (GNU automake) 1.7.9 found. > > I also thought that zip was there too, but I am too lazy to check. > No, zip is not. See report about it before in this review. Oh, unzip is there but not zip. Do you really need zip during build? > > openssl Requires should be picked up automatically. > Where it is written? It is not written, but rpm uses sonames for library dependencies, which means that you should never have to put library packages requires explicitly. > > Some suggestions, feel free not to use these: > > > > * the TABs look bad in my editor, maybe you could either use only spaces > > or use tabs more consistently > In my editor (mcedit) my tab look correct. I'm assume convert tabs into spaces > for your editor you may by one command, like this: sed -i 's/\t/ /g' sim.spec I know, but this spec is your spec :-). Not a big deal. (For the record my editor is vim). > > * The BuildRequires line that is very long could be split in 2 lines > But it is not required, right? Nope, that's why I put it in the suggestions. > > * remove from the description the text: > > > > SIM has countless features, many of them are listed at: > > http://sim-im.berlios.de/ > > > > since the URL is already a rpm tag. > No. This is "historical" text :) > I do not want remove them. I don't really get the historical argument, but this is a suggestion, so no problem if you prefer to have this 'historical text'. Another suggestion, #Rm symlink, which seems as development. should certainly be rephrased as something like # rm symlink since we don't support developping with sim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032149.m93Lnjko006728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #32 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-03 17:49:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) [...] > > * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names > > - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired. > > Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so > > on), > > which is rather a blocker. > > Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name, > > for > > example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed. > > The problem is that GROMACS has a big bunch of independent analysis tools that > users need, all of which must be in the system path. > > I renamed highway, luck, sigeps and wheel to g_highway, g_luck, g_sigeps and > g_wheel. I used autoreconf to regenerate the scripts. gromacs-filenames.patch looks like an autotools update for the whole GROMACS. I can't find what it really does among the hundereds of similar changes. Please limit the patch to renaming the problematic binaries only. Also I think more binaries should get the g_ prefix, but I'll look through the list tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456364] Review Request: pam_sotp - PAM module that provides support for One Time Passwords (OTP) authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032155.m93LtXsm006874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456364 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-03 17:55:31 EDT --- I have been meaning to get to this for quite sometime but keeping bumping into other things with a higher priority. This package is from the OLPC wishlist however. If you can look into the issue and help me fix this, it would be most helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:54:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032154.m93LspKL006423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #3 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-10-03 17:54:50 EDT --- Updated SPEC and SRPM: Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/globalplatform.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/globalplatform-5.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm I've addressed all issues (see changelog in spec and spec itself) except the pkg-config one as I'm not quite sure how to proceed with this. I was digging through the configure output and checking the config.log file to see what is going on there. The globalplatform configure script seems to use pkg-config to detect the location of pcsc-libs: configure:20726: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libpcsclite >= 1.2.9-beta7" configure:20729: $? = 0 configure:20781: result: yes configure:20815: checking winscard.h usability configure:20832: gcc -c -g -O2 -pthread -I/usr/include/PCSC conftest.c >&5 configure:20838: $? = 0 configure:20852: result: yes configure:20856: checking winscard.h presence configure:20871: gcc -E conftest.c conftest.c:27:22: error: winscard.h: No such file or directory configure:20877: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ | #define PACKAGE_NAME "GlobalPlatform" | #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "globalplatform" | #define PACKAGE_VERSION "5.0.0" | #define PACKAGE_STRING "GlobalPlatform 5.0.0" | #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "k_o_ at users.sourceforge.net" | #define PACKAGE "globalplatform" | #define VERSION "5.0.0" | #define STDC_HEADERS 1 | #define HAVE_MEMCPY 1 | #define HAVE_VSYSLOG 1 | /* end confdefs.h. */ | #include configure:20891: result: no configure:20897: WARNING: winscard.h: accepted by the compiler, rejected by the preprocessor! configure:20899: WARNING: winscard.h: proceeding with the compiler's result configure:20924: checking for winscard.h configure:20931: result: yes configure:20958: checking for SCardEstablishContext in -lpcsclite configure:20993: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -lpcsclite conftest.c -lpcsclite >&5 configure:20999: $? = 0 configure:21017: result: yes So it already seems that globalplatform needs pkgconfig as a dependency as otherwise it would never find the the winscard.h... Because it succeeds somehow in finding it can the rest of the configure stuff be ignored? It seems a bit "dirty"... GPshell (which used globalplatform) has the same pkg-config stuff for libpcsclite as globalplatform so that solves the problem for GPshell in that way... So, I'm not really sure what the best way to go would be... Thanks for your time and review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 21:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 17:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032159.m93LxW0n008924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #21 from ritz 2008-10-03 17:59:30 EDT --- > I notice a bunch of .la files packaged. Generally these should not be packaged; > do you have some specific reason for doing so? need them to build rep-gtk, or anything for that matter with rep. this is needed. added these to devel package. > Indeed -el subupackages are, unless I am wrong, like -devel subpackages. It > seems to me that the 'compiled' emacs module is missing. That being said, I > know next to nothing about emacs. I do not see any reason to build them. is this really required ? > The files in devel in /usr/lib/rep/%{_host} seem dubious. Are they really > of use? Yes, to build any apps againt rep. updated package http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-1.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:00:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032200.m93M0ObK007993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 --- Comment #5 from ritz 2008-10-03 18:00:23 EDT --- updated package http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk-0.18.1-1.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/rep-gtk.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:07:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032207.m93M7WEP010687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-03 18:07:30 EDT --- > Also, how do I add the fedora flags? Replacing make %{?_smp_mflags} with make %{?_smp_mflags} OPTFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" should do the trick. To understand why, just open the Makefile and search for OPTFLAGS. How is this package coming? I am curious about it. I didn't understand your question about unrar, can you explain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:12:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032212.m93MC9Bv009965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #35 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 18:12:08 EDT --- rpmlint says: sim.i386: E: invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib/sim/forward.la (line 17) In general the .la files are not useful in fedora. Is it different here? They also trigger tons of dubious Provides like libtool(/usr/lib/libsim.la) libtool(/usr/lib/sim/__homedir.la) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032222.m93MMuQx013281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 18:22:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I don't have a new package to submit yet, but I do have some comments and > questions. > > Patrice: > The only apparent difference between root and root.exe seems to be that root > displays a splash screen and then calls root.exe. Ok. > I had originally not included the cernlib requirement because I thought cernlib > was not being developed anymore. At least, the last release seems to have been > in 2006. Maybe the root people will update minicern more often then cernlib > will get updated. From my personal preference I'd prefer minicern, but if the > Fedora standards require cernlib-utils to be used, I guess I'll make those > changes. Indeed, cernlib is dead upstream, but I still maintain it in fedora. You are right that minicern may be updated more often, but it has very little coverage compared with cernlib. The fedora policy is to use only one library to fix bugs everywhere, but minicern is small and a fork, so it is not obvious what to do. I'd say that as an exception minicern can be used in root. If there are other advices it'd be better. > I thought unrar was only part of livna. Is this up for inclusion in F10? There is an unrar in fedora, but that cannot do all that the livna one can do. > Also, how do I add the fedora flags? Should I patch the Makefile to include > them, or is there a different method to include this into the spec file. The > packaging guidelines are not very clear on this matter. They cannot be clear, since it depends on the package. It may be as simple as using %configure or very complicated, depending on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032227.m93MRtw3014103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032229.m93MTaTb014537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:29:35 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pymssql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8556 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032227.m93MRpjC012494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:27:50 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032229.m93MTJ47012836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:29:19 EDT --- rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:29:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032229.m93MTMEJ012876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032233.m93MXWAe016183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:33:31 EDT --- greadelf-0.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:31:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032231.m93MVf6M015788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:31:40 EDT --- rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032234.m93MYf4g016474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032231.m93MViDC015831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:33:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464458] Review Request: greadelf - GUI frontend to elfinfo and eu-readelf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032233.m93MXYO3016215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464458 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032235.m93MZfSC015655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:35:40 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464457] Review Request: elfinfo - minimal elf file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032234.m93MYdnj014997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464457 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:34:38 EDT --- elfinfo-1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459883] Review Request: rubygem-git - A package for using Git in Ruby code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032235.m93MZR0r015569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459883 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:35:26 EDT --- rubygem-git-1.0.7-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459885] Review Request: rubygem-highline - HighLine is a high-level command-line IO library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032232.m93MWPUw014447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459885 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:32:24 EDT --- rubygem-highline-1.4.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032233.m93MXQJl014696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:33:25 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pymssql'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:35:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032235.m93MZSvH015598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 18:35:26 EDT --- The release is not right for svn snapshots. Should be like 0.1.20081003svn Since you use autogen now, I guess that autoconf/automake are needed. devel should require pkgconfig. Looks like the %{_libdir}/rep/ directory is unowned. Using rep in /usr/share, and in bindir is bad, in my opinion. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace Using librep instead would be right for the directory, and something else for the binary. But this has to be done with upstream. Regarding the emacs subpackages, my intuition is that with only the el package, it just doeosn't work. But i may well be wrong. I think that even if the emacs packaging is not perfect, this shouldn't block the review, this is not vital and i am not knowlegable enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461428] Review Request: orsa - Orbit Reconstruction, Simulation and Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032236.m93Ma3Yj017369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461428 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-03 18:36:02 EDT --- orsa-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:59:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:59:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032259.m93MxcrF021181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #36 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-03 18:59:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > %{?dist} is missing !!!! Thank you very much!! > I think not, it should be picked automatically using the soname. Ok. > > > The checkout instructions are not enough, you should add the command > > > that allows you to do the archive. > > It seems excessive, but I'm add this. > > You can do make dist, or tar directly, it should be possible to > redo exactly like you. Also it may be possible to recreate configure > offline. > > > > You install icons, so it is likely that a post script is missing. > > What script you keep in mind? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache Link is very usefull. Thanks again. I'm add icon update instructions. > It could. And besides this spec is not only for fedora, it is better > if it is reusable, be it only in EPEL. And it is at best unuseful. I'm do not firstly positioning this for any besides Fedora. Well, I'll have this on record. > Maybe, but it isn't used during the build? If it is used, I think > it is much better to call autoconf/automake/autoreconf explicitly. It is used from make -f admin/Makefile.common after %setup admin/Makefile.common is upstream file, so I not see any reason copy/past content of it into spec. > > > I also thought that zip was there too, but I am too lazy to check. > > No, zip is not. See report about it before in this review. > > Oh, unzip is there but not zip. Do you really need zip during > build? This check zip in ./configure, and fails if it is not present. Please, see buildlog with this report, if you want more details. > It is not written, but rpm uses sonames for library dependencies, > which means that you should never have to put library packages > requires explicitly. openssl package also provides few binaries, AFAIK. > Another suggestion, > #Rm symlink, which seems as development. > should certainly be rephrased as something like > # rm symlink since we don't support developping with sim Ok. I hope build it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 22:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 18:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032259.m93MxKiX020151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #23 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-03 18:59:18 EDT --- > Regarding the emacs subpackages, my intuition is that with only > the el package, it just doeosn't work. You really do not need .elc packages with emacs at all. This is only an "optimization" to load things faster and with nowadays CPUs negligible one (this was not the case at emacs beginnings). There was also "undumping" which ceased to be feasible. Moreover I know of cases when a presence of .elc packages really break things, causing some functions to bail out with complaints about wrong parameters, while removal of those and leaving only .el files provides a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 23:11:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032311.m93NBx26023742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #24 from ritz 2008-10-03 19:11:58 EDT --- > Since you use autogen now, I guess that autoconf/automake are needed. > devel should require pkgconfig. > Looks like the %{_libdir}/rep/ directory is unowned. Updated spec and srpm > Using rep in /usr/share, and in bindir is bad, in my opinion. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace > Using librep instead would be right for the directory, and something else for > the binary. But this has to be done with upstream. I really doubt, if this will happen anytime soon. Will check this up with upstream maintainer. Additionally, I was unable to locate any other projects, which used rep for name on google search. > You really do not need .elc packages with emacs at all. Thanks for the info. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 3 23:27:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 19:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810032327.m93NRFOM025732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-03 19:27:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > gromacs-filenames.patch looks like an autotools update for the whole GROMACS. > I can't find what it really does among the hundereds of similar changes. > Please limit the patch to renaming the problematic binaries only. Yes, but I really don't want to mess with machine generated makefiles to fix the file names, since I would probably have to do it all over again in the next release of Gromacs. I changed the spec to use autoreconf again and tested it against rawhide - works flawlessly. The new patch works on only the Makefile.am files. > Also I think more binaries should get the g_ prefix, but I'll look through the > list tomorrow. I thought about renaming the lot of them, but came to the conclusion that could disturb the users too much if they're used to the normal commands. Of course, there is the option to rename everything to start with g_ and provide an additional symlink package to make it possible to use the same commands to run GROMACS as elsewhere. Or yet another: put everything in %{_libexecdir}/%{name} and implement a module. This would mean we could drop the renaming altogether! What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 00:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040020.m940KoJ5003553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #25 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 20:20:49 EDT --- Where is the updated srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 00:21:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040021.m940L1wu003590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #37 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-03 20:21:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > > It could. And besides this spec is not only for fedora, it is better > > if it is reusable, be it only in EPEL. And it is at best unuseful. > I'm do not firstly positioning this for any besides Fedora. Well, I'll have > this on record. I am only saying that for the Distribution tag; but in general it is better to avoid using fedora name without good reason, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > > Maybe, but it isn't used during the build? If it is used, I think > > it is much better to call autoconf/automake/autoreconf explicitly. > It is used from > make -f admin/Makefile.common > after %setup > > admin/Makefile.common is upstream file, so I not see any reason copy/past > content of it into spec. Ok. There is chance that there are things that are not needed that are done, but, yes, using what upstream provides is right. But then there is this error: /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken pipe > This check zip in ./configure, and fails if it is not present. Please, see > buildlog with this report, if you want more details. It is enough. But it deserves a comment in the spec file in my opinion. Looking at the build, it looks like a zip archive is done. > openssl package also provides few binaries, AFAIK. If you need openssl for the binaries, please add a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 00:30:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040030.m940U4c1004830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #26 from ritz 2008-10-03 20:30:01 EDT --- here - http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-1.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 00:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040043.m940h2Th006374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #38 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-03 20:43:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > But then there is this error: > /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken pipe I assume it is may be safely ignored. It is not break build > > This check zip in ./configure, and fails if it is not present. Please, see > > buildlog with this report, if you want more details. > > It is enough. But it deserves a comment in the spec file in > my opinion. Looking at the build, it looks like a zip archive is done. Adding BR zip is already written in changelog. > > openssl package also provides few binaries, AFAIK. > If you need openssl for the binaries, please add a comment. I doubt. But I will investigate it later. And now I have one more question. I add icons handling scripts to %post/%postun section, as wrote before, but got warning on resulting rpm: sim.i386: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0 Why? Now I move /sbin/ldconfig down, from -p option and it seems worked. But What is switch "-p" in %post* macroses? I can not find any relevant info about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 00:57:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040057.m940vJ9f009158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-03 20:57:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Or yet another: put everything in %{_libexecdir}/%{name} and implement a > module. This would mean we could drop the renaming altogether! I prefer this way if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 01:02:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 21:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040102.m941283c011013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #39 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-03 21:02:08 EDT --- And please exceuse me, more question. Keep in mind what Fedora 10 early branch now available ( http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/93732 ) does it means I need request new brunch F-10 for package here?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 03:23:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: Pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040323.m943NWAJ000844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #5 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-03 23:23:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > For 1.3.2-2: > > * URL > - I think http://pmw.sourceforge.net/ is better for URL > > * SourceURL > - For tarball on sourceforge.net please refer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net > done. > * %prep > --------------------------------------------------- > %setup -q -n Pmw.1.3.2/src > --------------------------------------------------- > - After rebuilding the directory Pmw.1.3.2/src under %_builddir > But it leaved Pmw.1.3.2 directory undeleted, which is not > right. > %setup directory (relative to %_builddir) must not contain > any slash. > fixed. > > * License > --- Some files under src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/contrib/ are under GPLv2+ > --- Others are under MIT (from src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/copyright.html) > - So the license tag should be "MIT and GPLv2+". > fixed. > * %clean, %install > - %clean section is empty > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : > "MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, ...." > - Also %install does not contain any "cleaning" line. > fixed. > > * Directory ownership issue > - The directory %{python_sitelib}/ itself is owned by python and > should not be owned by this rpm. > fixed. > * Documents > - As license information is in src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/copyright.html > at least this file should be included in %doc. > I guess > ------------------------------------------------- > %doc src/Pmw/Pmw_1_3/doc/ > ------------------------------------------------- > is better. done. I also fixed the egg-info packaging according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw-1.3.2-3.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 03:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 23:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040330.m943UAir001917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-03 23:30:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > > you will need to create the tarball from upstream SVN, documenting the > > > procedure in the spec file (usually the easiest way is to add a small script > > > to compose the tarball). > > > > Done. > > That's better, but getting sources off the 1.1 branch does not guarantee we can > reproduce the build at any random time in the future because the branch will > likely be modified by bug fix commits. > Fixed. > > > > > > * There is no need to prepare and fill the docs directory, a single line in > > > the files section like: > > > > This was only done since the python setup script does not install the files > > into RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > > Yeah, that's normal. But files listed in %doc are picked up from RPM_BUILD_DIR > so it will work (I just tested it locally) > Ah, I didn't have them listed as %doc before - fixed this. > > > > > * it's the first time I see the sanity check on RPM_BUILD_ROOT before removing > > > it. I can't remember any guideline against it, but I'd avoid it anyway. > > > > removed. > > You removed too much ;) %install and %clean section must start with > rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} > I was suggesting removing just to the check ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} != "/" > Whoops - fixed. > > lastly, mock build still fails due to unpackaged egg-info file, please add > %{python_sitearch}/*egg-info > > to %files. Full details at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python I followed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs to properly set up the egg-info files. new spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-3.20080912svn3419.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 04:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040412.m944ChhB008475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 04:12:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040412.m944CgDb008450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-04 00:12:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Mouse Short Description: Moose minus the antlers Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 04:54:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040454.m944suEh014496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #2 from Timon 2008-10-04 00:54:56 EDT --- yes, i need a sponsor. or somebody can become a packager of this package :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 05:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 01:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456364] Review Request: pam_sotp - PAM module that provides support for One Time Passwords (OTP) authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040520.m945KQ14018665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456364 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-04 01:20:24 EDT --- I will look into this ASAP, may be tomorrow. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 07:54:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 03:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040754.m947s7n4010129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 --- Comment #13 from Daniel Qarras 2008-10-04 03:54:04 EDT --- FWIW, /usr/share/zsh/4.3.4/functions/tetris is still present in F10Beta. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 08:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 04:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040805.m94850Kk012404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #27 from ritz 2008-10-04 04:04:59 EDT --- > Using rep in /usr/share, and in bindir is bad, in my opinion. See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace debain is using rep itsel, and upstream[1] does not see much value in this change [1] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/sawfish-list/2008-October/msg00004.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 08:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 04:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040816.m948GMjB014918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #28 from ritz 2008-10-04 04:16:19 EDT --- updated package http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-2.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 08:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 04:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040832.m948WsYM017520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-04 04:32:53 EDT --- The package is pretty good shape. Here are my notes ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please fix or comment about items listed with [?] and [x]. [.]: good/pass [x]: bad/fail [o]: ugly... just kidding, this means N/A [?]: questions/comments [.] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint is silent [.] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [.] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [.] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [?] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. COPYING file says GPLv3 , doc/COPYING file says GPLv2 , {.C} files say GPL (version 2) explicitly. I would contact the author and ask what the actual license is. If that's not possible I think GPLv2 will be the best option (which is what you have already). [.] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [.] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [.] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [.] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. e836896fe76aae6aba447e44cdceba4f1c3d422feaf43857bb8e3e041378d297 rakarrack-0.2.0.tar.gz [.] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [o] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [.] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [o] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [o] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [o] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [.] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [.] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [.] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [.] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [.] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [.] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . [o] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [x] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. If you go to the Help-> contents or Help->about->license you will get errors. Those need fixed. [.] MUST: ScriptletSnippets are used properly. [o] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [o] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [o] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [o] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [o] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [o] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [.] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [.] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [.] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [.] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [.] MUST: Latest version is packaged. [?] MUST: Dist tag is present and proper. Afaik the usual way in Fedora is the usage n%{?dist} where n is the release number. Why did you use 0.n%{?dist} ? [x] MUST: Compiler flags are appropriate. Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. As the result debuginfo rpm is currently not useful. You can check what optflags are used by $ rpm --eval %optflags Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags [.] MUST: final provides and requires are sane [.] MUST: package builds in mock [.] MUST: package installs and removes properly. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Additional comments: This code # move icons to the proper freedesktop location %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_32x32.png \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/rakarrack.32x32.png %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_64x64.png \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/rakarrack.64x64.png %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_128x128.png \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/rakarrack.128x128.png will be cleaner if its written as for dim in 32x32 64x64 128x128; do %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_$dim.png \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/rakarrack.$dim.png done ------------------------------------------------------------------------- What is the %exclude for? %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop Can't you just use %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop or %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop ------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files implies that you can add/remove categories. Did I miss something? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a great application. It took me a while until I put my guitar down and finish the review. Thanks for including it in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 09:58:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 05:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810040958.m949wgIb001457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #29 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-04 05:58:40 EDT --- The %{_libdir}/rep/%{version}/ dir seems unowned. The %version is still wrong, should be 0.X.20081003svn.... I understand why the .la could be needed at runtime for the dlopened modules, but is really %{_libdir}/librep.la needed at build time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 10:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] New: Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Summary: Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libnxml.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/libnxml-0.18.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: nXML is a C library for parsing, writing and creating XML 1.0 and 1.1 files or streams. It supports utf-8, utf-16be and utf-16le, ucs-4 (1234, 4321, 2143, 2312). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 10:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041008.m94A8mNF003495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Bierfert 2008-10-04 06:08:47 EDT --- Nice to have for new gimmix version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 10:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041016.m94AGlVG005418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 --- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2008-10-04 06:16:45 EDT --- I hope someone will come up and maintain this package. I'm sorry but I don't have enough competence and I'm not much inclined to do this kind of work. The last but not the least - why is this package obsolete? I don't know any other utilities which can load sound banks into Creative sound cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 10:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 06:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041024.m94AOP9Z006257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Valent Turkovic 2008-10-04 06:24:23 EDT --- Will these new elisa packages go into Fedora 9? Please update Elisa for F9 because it currently is broken :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 11:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 07:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041104.m94B4MQe013081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-04 07:04:21 EDT --- I have added a %check rule in the specfile and made the file in etc a config file Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/chktex.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/chktex-1.6.4-2.fc9.src.rpm Yes, I should definitively make some reviews... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 11:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 07:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041130.m94BUFJ3019153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #30 from ritz 2008-10-04 07:30:14 EDT --- > I understand why the .la could be needed at runtime for the > dlopened modules, but is really %{_libdir}/librep.la needed > at build time? fixed. >The %version is still wrong, should be 0.X.20081003svn.... fixed http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep.spec http://people.redhat.com/rkhadgar/personal/fedora/librep-0.17.2-0.2.20081003svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 12:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041222.m94CMxCv032657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Jonathan Roberts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-04 08:22:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ume-launcher Short Description: a full screen application launcher for gnome Owners: jonrob Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 12:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041242.m94Cg1Fv004415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 Alphonse Van Assche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(alcapcom at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #8 from Alphonse Van Assche 2008-10-04 08:42:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This fails to build for me on current rawhide: > > /bin/sh -x /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform SDK /usr/share/eclipse > cdt > /bin/sh: /usr/share/eclipse/buildscripts/copy-platform: No such file or > directory > > I gather there's another way to do this these days. Yes there is one > Did you still want to submit this package? Would you post one that builds? Yes but I'm currently too busy, I hope to have more time to spent on fedora this month. Cheers, Alphonse -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 13:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 09:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041359.m94Dx1O4021212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 --- Comment #18 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-04 09:58:59 EDT --- Hi Odel, do you have time to look at this again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 14:12:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 10:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041412.m94ECHus024524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-04 10:12:16 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: FC-9 / i386 [x] Rpmlint output: clean [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Sources from SVN, commented properly in SPEC file. Diff againts sources in SRPM and sources download is OK. [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR: Arches excluded: x86_64, ppc64, sparc64 Why: upstream is broken for 64 bit architectures After approval fill bugs blocking FE-ExcludeArch-x64, FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [-] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: koji dist-fc8 dist-fc9 dist-fc10 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji dist-fc8 dist-fc9 dist-fc10 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. APROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 14:46:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 10:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252223] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Remote System Explorer for eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041446.m94EkkkS031686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252223 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-04 10:46:45 EDT --- Please clear the status whiteboard when this is ready for a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 15:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041509.m94F9Nhd003474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-04 11:09:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Also, > > * Please write the origin of SOURCE1 (if possible write a full URL, or > write comments how you gained the SOURCE1) Fixed. > * Remove redundant Requires. python-pwm already Requires python, tkinter > so these need not be listed on the Requires of this rpm. Fixed. > * When using or "install" commands add "-p" option to keep timestamps > on installed files. thanks. > * Replace %_usr by %_prefix Removed (no longer necessary with some of the changes given above) the spec and srpm given in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251#c6 include these changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 15:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041525.m94FPB3t006000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-04 11:25:10 EDT --- Module system implemented after a lot of work. Please test on other architectures than x86_64. Have a look at http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.10.rc3.fc9.src.rpm If anyone knows how to build under mock for RHEL let me know. It should be quite simple, since one just needs to resource the shell profile somehow to make it refresh mpi variables. I'm also working on a gromacs3 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 15:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 11:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041525.m94FP6tS005955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-04 11:25:04 EDT --- Since this is currently a package review ticket, and a package isn't actually being submitted here, I can only close it. I would try to assign it to a more appropriate component, except that it started at "kernel" for some reason. Bottom line: Fedora is a community project. If someone steps up to maintain the package, they can open a proper package review ticket and, once the review process is done, the package can reappear in Fedora. Without a maintainer, the package can't be in the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 16:37:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041637.m94GbYk5016599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Summary|Review Request: Pmw - |Review Request: python-pmw |python megawidgets |- python megawidgets Alias|Pmw | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 16:56:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041656.m94GuQll019509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-04 12:56:25 EDT --- * rpmlint output ignorable: librep-devel.i386: W: no-documentation librep-devel.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib emacs-librep-el.i386: W: no-documentation X free software, but license should be included * follow guidelines * match upstream (checked manually) * usual .so unuseful provides X directory %{_libdir}/rep/%{version}/ unowned. # rpm -qf /usr/lib/rep/0.17.2/ file /usr/lib/rep/0.17.2 is not owned by any package I would suggest putting AUTHORS MAINTAINERS in %doc. And maybe doc/*. 2 issues marked with X to be fixed before approval. And also before approval there are multilib issues remaining: In librep.pc there is no Libs: entry??? The file /usr/bin/rep-config will conflict in multilib settings, on fedora it would be better to patch it such that it is a wrapper around pkgconfig, and you can submit to upstream the resulting rep-config script such that they also ship it, and packagers can choose what to install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 17:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] New: Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 Summary: Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3-3.3.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: GROMACS is a versatile and extremely well optimized package to perform molecular dynamics computer simulations and subsequent trajectory analysis. It is developed for biomolecules like proteins, but the extremely high performance means it is used also in several other field like polymer chemistry and solid state physics. The package gromacs3 provides the older stable release series of GROMACS, and is based on the specfile of the gromacs package. gromacs package review at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 17:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041712.m94HCCoE022663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #36 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-04 13:12:11 EDT --- OK, it was as easy as I thought, just had to source /etc/profile.d/mpi-selector.sh . Thanks to the module system gromacs 4 and gromacs 3 can be installed simultaneously. I have created packages of GROMACS 3.3.3 using the same spec file with little modification. Some people may still want to run the older release version. Please review gromacs3 at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 New gromacs specfile: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.11.rc3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 17:26:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041726.m94HQoqL025075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-04 13:26:49 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 17:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041726.m94HQkwS025039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-04 13:26:45 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 17:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 13:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041729.m94HTJaA024973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 18:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 14:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041812.m94IClM4001456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-04 14:12:45 EDT --- For -3: * %version macro - Please consider to use %{version} macro (also see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * CFLAGS in noarch rpm - The part CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is not needed because this is noarch. * Macros in %changelog or comments - In %changelog or comments, use %% instead of % (e.g. "add doc to %%files, add ..") so that macros won't be expanded. Now I am trying to see pymol, however it may take a bit long.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 19:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041911.m94JBsa1011454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-04 15:11:53 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319472) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319472) gdb log when pymol causes segv Well, for 1.1-3svn: * License ------------------------------------------------ Overall license : MIT contrib/modules/ExtensionClass.LICENSE ZPLv2.0 contrib/modules/ExtensionClass.c-py152 BSD contrib/uiuc/plugins/LICENSE BSD contrib/uiuc/plugins/molfile_plugin/LICENSE BSD layer1/FontTTF.h Bitstream Vera layer1/FontTTF2.h OFL ov/src/OVRandom.c BSD ------------------------------------------------ - The license tag should be "MIT and BSD and ZPLv2.0 and Bitstream Vera and OFL". * Source0 - Please add revision number of svn also to the name of Source0 tarball (i.e. pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz) * python modules dependency - Please check if all python modules related rpms are correctly added to Requires. * For example chempy/fast/__init__.py contains: ------------------------------------------------ 6 from Numeric import * 7 from Precision import * ------------------------------------------------ I guess pymol should have "Requires: python-numeric" (maybe even more) * optflags - build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------ 226 creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/layer5 227 gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -D_PYMOL_MODULE -D_PYMOL_INLINE -D_PYMOL_FREETYPE -D_HAVE_LIBPNG -Iov/src -Ilayer0 -Ilayer1 -Ilayer2 -Ilayer3 -Ilayer4 -Ilayer5 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/python2.5 -c ov/src/OVContext.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/ov/src/OVContext.o -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 ------------------------------------------------ Please remove "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3". These flags makes debugging difficult, or changes calculation precision. * Document - Please also add the following file(s) to %doc ------------------------------------------------- AUTHORS ------------------------------------------------- * generic rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------- pymol.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-3 1.1-3.20080912svn3419.fc10 pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/feedback2.c pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/feedback2.h pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/err2.c ------------------------------------------------- - Change the %changelog entry like below: ------------------------------------------------- * Thu Oct 02 2008 Tim Fenn - 1.1-3-20080912svn3419 - fix release tag, add egg-info, minor fixes ------------------------------------------------- - Fix the permissions of C codes in the tarball to 0644 to suppress rpmlint warnings for debuginfo rpm. * segv - By the way for pymol causes segv with ------------------------------------------------- pymol-1.1-3.20080912svn3419.fc10.i386 mesa-libGL-7.1-0.37.fc10.i386 python-2.5.2-1.fc10.i386 ------------------------------------------------- when just launching pymol. gdb log attached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 19:16:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810041916.m94JGYiC013127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-04 15:16:33 EDT --- By the way output from pymol seems to be saying that this is a pre-version of 1.1. In such cases please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages i.e. release number should be 0.3.20080912svn3419%{?dist}, for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 21:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810042125.m94LPTk2001847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #42 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-04 17:25:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > (In reply to comment #37) > > But then there is this error: > > /usr/bin/autoconf: line 519: echo: write error: Broken pipe > > I assume it is may be safely ignored. It is not break build I think that it is worth investigating. But it is up to you. > Adding BR zip is already written in changelog. I would have preferred a comment next to the BuildRequires, but do as you please. > And now I have one more question. I add icons handling scripts to %post/%postun > section, as wrote before, but got warning on resulting rpm: > sim.i386: E: postin-without-ldconfig /usr/lib/libsim.so.0.0.0 > > Why? > Now I move /sbin/ldconfig down, from -p option and it seems worked. But What is > switch "-p" in %post* macroses? I can not find any relevant info about it. It is explained in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 22:58:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 18:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] New: Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 Summary: Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol-1.273-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: FireHOL uses an extremely simple but powerful way to define firewall rules which it turns into complete stateful iptables firewalls. FireHOL is a generic firewall generator, meaning that you can design any kind of local or routing stateful packet filtering firewalls with ease. Install FireHOL if you want an easy way to configure stateful packet filtering firewalls on Linux hosts and routers. You can run FireHOL with the 'helpme' argument, to get a configuration file for the system run, which you can modify according to your needs. The default configuration file will allow only client traffic on all interfaces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 23:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810042304.m94N4Gkk018271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-04 19:04:16 EDT --- rpmlint output: firehol.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/firehol firehol.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/init.d/firehol 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 4 23:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 19:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810042311.m94NBvw7018940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #24 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-10-04 19:11:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/trash.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/trash-cli-0.1.10.r55-1.fc9.src.rpm - The project URL has changed - Update to the new release Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=861510 I have send a mail to devel-list asking for a reviewer who would accept this package : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00216.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 04:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 00:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050409.m95497GW030484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #6 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-10-05 00:09:06 EDT --- In less than 1 week, Beda, the upstream programmer, will be releasing one new version of BKChem with two specific sources. One, specially prepared to avoid some problems with Fedora's criteria, like the issue with Piddle's licence. I'm only waiting for him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:00:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465646] New: Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Summary: Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-core.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-core-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Hachoir is the french name for a mincer: a tool used by butchers to cut meat. Hachoir is also a tool written for hackers to cut file or any binary stream. A file is splitted in a tree of fields where the smallest field can be just a bit. There are various field types: integer, string, bits, padding, sub file, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:14:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465646] Review Request: hachoir-core - Hachoir core parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050514.m955E4Mp009204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465646 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465649] Review Request: hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050514.m955E32L009178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465649 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |465646 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:13:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465649] New: Review Request: hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465649 Summary: Review Request: hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-parser.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-parser-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: hachoir-parser is a package of most common file format parsers written using hachoir-core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465649] Review Request: hachoir-parser - Package of Hachoir parsers used to open binary files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050534.m955YQNP013129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465649 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465650 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465650] Review Request: hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050534.m955YPRw013104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465650 Jean-Fran?ois Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |465649 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 05:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 01:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465650] New: Review Request: hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465650 Summary: Review Request: hachoir-metadata - Program to extract metadata using Hachoir library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lokthare at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-metadata.spec SRPM URL: http://lokthare.fedorapeople.org/temp/hachoir-metadata-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: hachoir-metadata extracts metadata from multimedia files: music, picture, video, but also archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 06:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 02:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050625.m956PlEe022190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-05 02:25:46 EDT --- Ping! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 06:53:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 02:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050653.m956rP6k027296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 02:53:23 EDT --- The package is in good condition. Some notes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The line: dos2unix Readme.txt LICENSE.txt is not necassary. You can use "sed" instead. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding So you can remove dos2unix from BuildRequires ------------------------------------------------------------------------- $RPM_OPT_FLAGS is not passed to gcc correctly. Hence the debuginfo package is not useful. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please be consistent with macros. e.g. in the spec file there is cp -ra data/* %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/biniax/data in one line and %{_datadir}/%{name} on the other. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- It would be nice if you can make the desktop file richer. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files At least, have those fields that are given in that example full. For instance "Name:Biniax" (mind the capital letter) would look nicer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: An unique ... should be Summary: A unique ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The game does not exit properly. I have to kill the process in order to exit the game. Is this because of your patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 06:58:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 02:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050658.m956wX32028271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #18 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-05 02:58:32 EDT --- I will import it now. Thanks for reminder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 07:15:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 03:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050715.m957FSB9031831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-05 03:15:27 EDT --- Doesn't build at my F-9/ppc. + mv /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlbase.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlbase.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlbase.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlconvenience.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlconvenience.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlconvenience.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmldom.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmldom.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmldom.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlengine.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlengine.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlengine.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlregionator.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlregionator.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkmlregionator.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libminizip.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libminizip.so.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libminizip.so.0.0.0 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/liburiparser.so /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/liburiparser.so.1 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/liburiparser.so.1.0.5 /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkml/ + chrpath --delete /var/tmp/libkml-0.4.0-1.fc9-root-petro/usr/lib/libkml/libkmldom_swig_java.so.0.0.0 open: No such file or directory elf_open: Illegal seek error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60804 (%install) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.60804 (%install) [petro at Sulaco SPECS] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 08:02:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050802.m9582pP7008339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-05 04:02:50 EDT --- It wouldn't built for F-9, because dependencies are only available it F-10 or rawhide. Not for F-9 or F-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 08:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050814.m958ET0K010690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-05 04:14:29 EDT --- > because dependencies are only available it F-10 or rawhide. No, all dependencies were satisfied on my F9. Probaply you need to add minimal supported versions to dependencies, e.g. not only "BuildRequires: foo", but "BuildRequires: foo >= 1.2.3.4" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 08:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050819.m958J5db012158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-05 04:19:04 EDT --- # requires swig >= 1.3.35 yes, i will do that. Swig 1.3.35 is not available for F-9, so I wouldn't be making it available for F-9 anyway. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 08:24:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050824.m958O0Qe014523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-05 04:23:59 EDT --- Ok, that's great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 08:27:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 04:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050827.m958Rhkm014826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 04:27:42 EDT --- The package is (almost) perfect. Koji build is good too. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=861703 Here are my notes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- You include a .desktop file in the package. Shouldn't you call some update-database script to let KDE know that you added something? I'm just asking (not requiring). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags packages should honor Fedora-specific compiler flags. Make sure that $RPM_OPT_FLAGS is being honored and used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is one of my favorite plasma applets. IMHO It should be included in KDE. Thanks for packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 09:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050920.m959KBMw024743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 09:17:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:17:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050917.m959HW2X023794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 05:17:31 EDT --- php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 09:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 05:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810050918.m959IXPj023988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 05:18:32 EDT --- php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 10:14:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 06:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051014.m95AELsJ001328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #44 from Axel Thimm 2008-10-05 06:14:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ivtv-utils Short Description: Tools for the iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driver Owners: athimm Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 10:17:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 06:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051017.m95AHifY002124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #7 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-05 06:17:43 EDT --- New version at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/gnomint/gnomint-0.5.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/gnomint/gnomint.spec Includes more fixes and new upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 10:27:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 06:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051027.m95ARwkK004198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-05 06:27:57 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/libkml-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/libkml.spec Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 10:57:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 06:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051057.m95AvNTl009655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #2 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-10-05 06:57:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > You include a .desktop file in the package. Shouldn't you call some > update-database script to let KDE know that you added something? I'm just > asking (not requiring). You have to, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 11:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051104.m95B4xmD010855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: anyconnect |Review Request: openconnect |-- client for Cisco |-- client for Cisco |AnyConnect VPN |AnyConnect VPN -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 11:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: anyconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051104.m95B4OSm010873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #1 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-05 07:04:23 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/openconnect-f9/openconnect-0.92-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 11:13:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051113.m95BD3Ew012903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 Paul Cochrane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(paultcochrane at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #11 from Paul Cochrane 2008-10-05 07:13:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ping, it is again a month > I will close this if not updated within a week. In that you can you can open a > bug again when you are free. I think this is a good idea. Unfortunately, I don't have any more time at present to work on this project, so closing the bug and then reopening it again if I find the time is a good idea. Thanks heaps for your time! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 11:45:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 07:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051145.m95BjERF019041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-05 07:45:12 EDT --- The issue of %{name} and 'screenruler' being mixed in the Spec is still there, but I will leave it to your personal taste. :-) +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-October/msg00004.html suggests an alternative way of renaming packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:05:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051205.m95C5WNY024285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #4 from David Timms 2008-10-05 08:05:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The package is pretty good shape. Here are my notes Thanks for taking the time to review rakarrack ! > [?] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > COPYING file says GPLv3 , doc/COPYING file says GPLv2 , {.C} files say GPL > (version 2) explicitly. I would contact the author and ask what the actual > license is. If that's not possible I think GPLv2 will be the best option (which > is what you have already). As suggested I have posted a forum query on the developers' source forge site: https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2323002&forum_id=778861 In the meantime, I'll assume GPLv2 since that is what is in the source code. > [x] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the > runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must > run properly if it is not present. > If you go to the Help-> contents or Help->about->license you will get errors. > Those need fixed. Confirmed, and fixed. > [?] MUST: Dist tag is present and proper. > Afaik the usual way in Fedora is the usage n%{?dist} where n is the release > number. Why did you use 0.n%{?dist} ? OK. While initially working on the package on my own system, I used the "-0.x" pre-release scheme. I will properly fit the fedora scheme with the next update. > [x] MUST: Compiler flags are appropriate. > Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. As the result > debuginfo rpm is currently not useful. You can check what optflags are used by > $ rpm --eval %optflags > Please see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags How did you work that out ? The .debuginfo has a reasonable size, installs OK, contains .c/.h files and what appears to be the debuginfo. The opt flags are included, but some are added twice for example from a rpmbuild: ----- if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -Wall -msse -fno-rtti -pipe -ffunction-sections -fomit-frame-pointer -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT FilterParams.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/FilterParams.Tpo" -c -o FilterParams.o FilterParams.C; \ ----- rpm --eval %optflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables Seems the result would be conflicting options for -f{no}exceptions. I don't know if the the app will work without that option, and had no success in avoiding the default CFLAGS. Help wanted ! > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Additional comments: > This code > > # move icons to the proper freedesktop location > %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps > %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps > %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps > %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_32x32.png \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/rakarrack.32x32.png > %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_64x64.png \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/rakarrack.64x64.png > %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_128x128.png \ > > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/rakarrack.128x128.png > > will be cleaner if its written as > for dim in 32x32 64x64 128x128; do > %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps > %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_$dim.png \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/rakarrack.$dim.png > done OK, I can see that saves a few lines, and it will limit the amount of rework that might be required if paths needed to be changed etc. Done. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > What is the %exclude for? > > %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop > %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop > > Can't you just use > %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop > or > %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop The source includes a .desktop file, that "make install" puts in the normal location. The spec generates another with the fedora required bits added, and prepended with fedora-*. I found that without the %{exclude} I end up with two Rakarrack items in the menu. I had tried to remove items from the included .desktop, but didn't seem to be able to do this with desktop-file-install: included: rakarrack-0.2.0/data/rakarrack.desktop ----- [Desktop Entry] Type=Application Categories=AudioVideo;Audio; Exec=rakarrack Name=Rakarrack Comment=Guitar Effects Processor Terminal=false Icon=icono_rakarrack_128x128 ----- generated: ----- [Desktop Entry] Version=1.0 Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Rakarrack GenericName=Digital audio effects processor Comment=Real-time audio effects processing rack for guitar Exec=rakarrack Icon=rakarrack.64x64.png Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=AudioVideo;Audio;Mixer; X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.15 ----- If there is a better fix example that you know of, let me know. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > implies that you can add/remove categories. Did I miss something? Categories=yes, modifying other items didn't seem possible. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is a great application. It took me a while until I put my guitar down and > finish the review. Thanks for including it in Fedora. You need to primarily thank Fernando for his CCRMA audio packaging for fedora. ps. Perhaps you would like to help in Fedorizing more of planetccrma's audio packages ? Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec New .src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-1.fc9.src.rpm - simplify the icon installation by looping through dimensions - fix missing ; on category line in desktop file - don't rename the icons since it confuses desktop-file-install - fix spelling in description - fix help menu contents not being displayed due to marking help files doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:20:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051220.m95CKKST027954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #5 from David Timms 2008-10-05 08:20:18 EDT --- ps: Is this a pre-review ? I can't seem to find your user name in FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 326421] Review Request: xmds - the eXtensible Multi-Dimensional Simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051229.m95CTnla029544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326421 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-05 08:29:48 EDT --- Okay, feel free to reopen it as a new review request when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:33:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051233.m95CXAjp030169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051247.m95ClHWg000337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 12:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 08:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051247.m95ClIkB000359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 13:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051316.m95DGQr8006975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-05 09:16:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319494) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319494) Patch to provide globalplatform.pc (In reply to comment #3) > I've addressed all issues (see changelog in spec and spec itself) except the > pkg-config one as I'm not quite sure how to proceed with this. > > I was digging through the configure output and checking the config.log file to > see what is going on there. The globalplatform configure script seems to use > pkg-config to detect the location of pcsc-libs: Yes, and it is not what I mentioned before. What I said is that it is better that you create globalplatform.pc(.in) and install it under %_libdir/pkgconfig so that other applications using globalplatform-devel package will find the needed CFLAGS easily. How do you think? Note: When applying this patch, your spec file should be fixed like: ------------------------------------------------------------------- Name: globalplatform Version: 5.0.0 ...... BuildRequires: openssl-devel >= 0.9.7e BuildRequires: zlib-devel >= 1.2.3 BuildRequires: pcsc-lite-devel BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: libtool ...... %prep %setup -q %patch0 -p1 -b .add aclocal autoconf automake touch -r Makefile.in configure aclocal.m4 %build ........ %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/*.so %{_includedir}/GlobalPlatform/ %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/*.pc ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 13:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051318.m95DIs3J006899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-05 09:18:53 EDT --- By the way: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 15:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051510.m95FAZ99028277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #2 from Warren Togami 2008-10-05 11:10:34 EDT --- I'm willing to sponsor Peter after the package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 15:23:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 11:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051523.m95FNG5Y030021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-05 11:23:14 EDT --- For 1.41-1 * Summary/Description - Would you change Summary/Description more informative? I don't think the Summary "Additional libraries" makes much sense. * Naming - First of all, why is this srpm named as "bouncycastle-mail", not "bcmail"? * License - License tag should be "MIT" * SourceURL - SOURCE0 must be written with full URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * (Build)Requires - I guess "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7" is better than java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel. * unpackaging source / removing precompiled binaries - Please unpack all sources in the tarball before removing precompiled binaries to make it sure that all precompiled binaries (including those in zip files if any) are correctly removed. ! By the way when using "unzip" adding "-qq" option is preferred. When using zip source tarball %setup -q uses this. * absolute symlink ----------------------------------------------------- W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcmail-1.41.jar /usr/share/java/bcmail-1.41.jar ----------------------------------------------------- - Mainly for chroot reason and so on, Fedora requests that all symlinks should be relative, not absolute. ! %postun ----------------------------------------------------- %postun if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then if [ -x %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db ]; then %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db fi fi ----------------------------------------------------- - While I am not familiar with gcj, would you explain why it is sufficient that these scripts are called only when [ $1 -eq 0 ] ? (please also refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines ) * %attr - Although GCJGuidelines uses it, the part "%attr(-,root,root)" is completely redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 16:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051603.m95G3HIx003821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 12:03:16 EDT --- freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 16:23:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:23:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051623.m95GN0Tg006742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 12:23:00 EDT --- freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 16:39:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051639.m95Gdrc4010106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 12:39:52 EDT --- freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 16:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 12:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051655.m95GtDEF013333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 12:55:12 EDT --- freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051703.m95H3AlU014820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #32 from ritz 2008-10-05 13:03:09 EDT --- > The file /usr/bin/rep-config will conflict in multilib settings, is multilib support really required ? As i see this to be of little value - comment#11 . > In librep.pc there is no Libs: entry??? As of now, i am thinking of excluding this from package. Will talk to upstream about this using this as a wrapper around pkgconfig. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051726.m95HQKcp019261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 13:26:19 EDT --- freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051726.m95HQE7m019595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-05 13:26:13 EDT --- freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] New: Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing Alias: perl-DBD-Multi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-Multi OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBD-Multi-0.14-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-DBD-Multi.spec Description: This software manages multiple database connections for failovers and also simple load balancing. It acts as a proxy between your code and your database connections, transparently choosing a connection for each query, based on your preferences and present availability of the DB server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:32:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051732.m95HWMKQ020565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-05 13:32:21 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=862415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:34:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051734.m95HYsu6020683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 17:38:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051738.m95Hcbcf021466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 13:38:36 EDT --- Dear Milos, I was aware of that page and actually it's that page which got me confused. This is not a regular desktop file. It is a KDE4 desktop file. I'm not sure if it should be treated differently or not. For instance, the spec file of the approved kde-plasma-lancelot package doesn't have such a call. Well, maybe you are right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:10:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] New: Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Summary: Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/drascula.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/drascula-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: You play the role of John Hacker, a British estate agent, who travels to a small village of Transylvania in order to negotiate the sale of some ground of Gibraltar with the Count Drascula. But unfortunately Hacker is not aware of who is Drascula in reality: the most terrible vampire with just one idea on his mind: DOMINATING the World demonstrating that he is even more evil than his brother Vlad. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051813.m95IDZWZ026792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-05 14:13:34 EDT --- Seems like I forgot to update the spec file, fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051823.m95INJSK028805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-05 14:23:18 EDT --- So it does. ;( James: Can this be removed? Adding the legal blocker to see if this is really needing to be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051827.m95IR4XN029269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #14 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-05 14:27:03 EDT --- ok ..will fix them soon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051837.m95IbA7t031463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-05 14:37:09 EDT --- Thanks for the comment Ralf. The package from comment #11 looks good to me, I don't see any further blockers, so this package is APPROVED. I'll go ahead and sponsor you jebba. Continue the process from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Just let me know what your fedora account is so I can sponsor you. Please let me know if you have any questions or issues either here, in email or on irc. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051838.m95IcYAT031108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-05 14:38:33 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR, as I am sponsoring submitter. Jebba: The ping in comment #6 was asking if you had a chance to address the issues mentioned in comment #5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 18:51:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447533] Review Request: minirpc - an RPC library for stream oriented transports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051851.m95IpFml001321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447533 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Adam Goode 2008-10-05 14:51:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: minirpc New Branches: EL-5 Owners: agoode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 19:21:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051921.m95JLVNp005679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #43 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-05 15:21:30 EDT --- Patrice Dumas thanks for the link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 19:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051934.m95JY5PN007533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #13 from jebba 2008-10-05 15:34:04 EDT --- My fedora account is jebba too (as in here and irc). I already have a fedora account and am cla_done. Just now I applied here (Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group): https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/list?search=packager* Thanks kevin! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 19:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051946.m95Jk7kK010419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-05 15:46:06 EDT --- update-database is required only if the .desktop file includes the MimeType= key (which I don't think is the case here). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 19:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 15:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810051947.m95JliMj009993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #33 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-05 15:47:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > > The file /usr/bin/rep-config will conflict in multilib settings, > is multilib support really required ? As i see this to be of little value - > comment#11 . One may want to link against a specific arch. But even though this is not a very usefull setting, one should not have get error when installing both, and currently this is the case, since there is a conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052015.m95KFdYT014727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #6 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-05 16:15:38 EDT --- Update for 1.6 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/printoxx.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/printoxx-1.6-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:34:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052034.m95KYK6q018016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #5 from Milos Jakubicek 2008-10-05 16:34:18 EDT --- I'm not sure whether we're speaking about the same thing now: I didn't say anything about update-desktop-database. The question was about "some update-database script" a my answer concerns the usage of desktop-file-install, where the current guidelines state: "It is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, one MUST run desktop-file-install OR desktop-file-validate in %install (and have BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils), to help ensure .desktop file safety and spec-compliance." If this is not necessary anymore generally (what I doubt strongly) or not necessary in this particular case (if so, please explain to me why -- thanks), then its a topic for FPC to change the guidelines accordingly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052033.m95KXtDD017520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-05 16:33:54 EDT --- lowercase(In reply to comment #9) > Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming > "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". lowercase please Appart from that, I really need to find a few hours to review the font packages backlog :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052041.m95KfSxV019134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #9 from jebba 2008-10-05 16:41:27 EDT --- I was just buying time. :) 0.3.0-3 http://www.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt.spec http://www.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt-0.3.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Fixed: - License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ - Group: Development/Tools - ExcludeArch: x86_64 s390 s390x ppc ppc64 - %%defattr(-,root,root) - %%doc docs/ - %%{_libdir}/%%{name} to main package Punted: * mlt-devel.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/mlt/libmltgtk2.so * compilation flags, debug info I'll be able to fix the compilation flags/debug, but I don't know about the executable-stack. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:49:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] New: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Summary: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/perl-qooxdoo-compat/perl-qooxdoo-compat.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/perl-qooxdoo-compat/perl-qooxdoo-compat-0.7.3-1.fc9.src.rpm description: This package provides the Perl backend for Qooxdoo, a comprehensive and innovative Ajax application framework. This package supports Qooxdoo 0.7. koji: N/A, koji seems to be down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:54:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052054.m95KsE1M020930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |441378 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 20:54:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 16:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052054.m95KsDLa020910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |465710 --- Comment #25 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-05 16:54:11 EDT --- Updated package: - move Qooxdoo::JSONRPC to separate package, see #465710 spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-5.fc9.src.rpm koji: N/A, koji seems to be down. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 21:19:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052119.m95LJL1q024809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-05 17:19:20 EDT --- I wonder if (quoting from http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=862416&name=build.log ) is normal: t/pod-coverage......... skipped: Pod not available for individual methods in DBD::Multi, use DBI instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 5 22:06:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 18:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810052206.m95M6BNM000529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-05 18:06:10 EDT --- I was only responding to comment #2, "ie, to let system know" Yes, desktop-file-install usage *is* required, and is a separate issue (used for .desktop file validation purposes primarily). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 01:18:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060118.m961Ifd0031211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 21:18:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > The package is pretty good shape. Here are my notes > Thanks for taking the time to review rakarrack ! > > > [?] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > > license. > > COPYING file says GPLv3 , doc/COPYING file says GPLv2 , {.C} files say GPL > > (version 2) explicitly. I would contact the author and ask what the actual > > license is. If that's not possible I think GPLv2 will be the best option (which > > is what you have already). > As suggested I have posted a forum query on the developers' source forge site: > https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2323002&forum_id=778861 > In the meantime, I'll assume GPLv2 since that is what is in the source code. > Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [?] MUST: Dist tag is present and proper. > > Afaik the usual way in Fedora is the usage n%{?dist} where n is the release > > number. Why did you use 0.n%{?dist} ? > OK. While initially working on the package on my own system, I used the "-0.x" > pre-release scheme. I will properly fit the fedora scheme with the next update. > That's fine, as long as you turn to the standard at the end of the day. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [x] MUST: Compiler flags are appropriate. > > Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored correctly. As the result > > debuginfo rpm is currently not useful. You can check what optflags are used by > > $ rpm --eval %optflags > > Please see: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > How did you work that out ? > The .debuginfo has a reasonable size, installs OK, contains .c/.h files and > what appears to be the debuginfo. > > The opt flags are included, but some are added twice for example from a > rpmbuild: > ----- > if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. > -O2 -Wall -msse -fno-rtti -pipe -ffunction-sections -fomit-frame-pointer > -Wno-format-y2k -fPIC -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing > -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT FilterParams.o -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/FilterParams.Tpo" -c -o FilterParams.o FilterParams.C; \ > ----- > rpm --eval %optflags > -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > > Seems the result would be conflicting options for -f{no}exceptions. I don't > know if the the app will work without that option, and had no success in > avoiding the default CFLAGS. Help wanted ! > Uh oh, sorry my bad. I missed that the %configure macro takes care of the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS. About -f{no}exceptions : If two opposite flags are passed, the latter is picked up. So you are fine in this case. You can keep it the way you had in the 0.1 spec file. In the future make sure that nothing overrides the opt flags. (Always the last ones are picked up!) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> will be cleaner if its written as >> for dim in 32x32 64x64 128x128; do >> %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps >> %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_$dim.png \ >> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/rakarrack.$dim.png >> done >OK, I can see that saves a few lines, and it will limit the amount of rework >that might be required if paths needed to be changed etc. Done. Thanks! But I need to correct myself here. %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_$dim.png \ %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/rakarrack.png would be better. None of the existing icons I saw in hicolors/$dim/apps/ are named as application.$dim.png . They are all named as application.png . Let's keep the thing as they are. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > What is the %exclude for? > > > > %exclude %{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop > > %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop > > > > Can't you just use > > %{_datadir}/applications/*desktop > > or > > %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop > The source includes a .desktop file, that "make install" puts in the normal > location. The spec generates another with the fedora required bits added, and > prepended with fedora-*. I found that without the %{exclude} I end up with two > Rakarrack items in the menu. > > I had tried to remove items from the included .desktop, but didn't seem to be > able to do this with desktop-file-install: > included: rakarrack-0.2.0/data/rakarrack.desktop > ----- > [Desktop Entry] > Type=Application > Categories=AudioVideo;Audio; > Exec=rakarrack > Name=Rakarrack > Comment=Guitar Effects Processor > Terminal=false > Icon=icono_rakarrack_128x128 > ----- > generated: > ----- > [Desktop Entry] > Version=1.0 > Encoding=UTF-8 > Name=Rakarrack > GenericName=Digital audio effects processor > Comment=Real-time audio effects processing rack for guitar > Exec=rakarrack > Icon=rakarrack.64x64.png > Terminal=false > Type=Application > Categories=AudioVideo;Audio;Mixer; > > X-Desktop-File-Install-Version=0.15 > ----- > If there is a better fix example that you know of, let me know. > You can overwrite the existing .desktop file with %Source1 after "make install" so there won't be an ambiguity. I think the final .desktop file in the RPM should be named rakarrack.desktop (not rakarrack-fedora.desktop , this would be unusual!). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- A few other important things: In the spec file, avoid using %macros directly inside comments and changelogs. e.g. this is WRONG: # This comment concerns %build and %{__make} The macros in this example will expand out when the RPM is built. If want to indicate a macro in a comment or in the changelog do it the CORRECT way: # This comment concerns %%build and %%{__make} ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I recommend using the %{name} macro instead of hardcoding the name of the application into the spec file; i.e. in this case replacing the occurences of rakarrack * with %{name} is the preferred way. Same thing applies for the %{version} macro. * except in the beginning: "Name: rakarrack" where you are actually defining %{name} ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I love planetccrma. I used that repo a lot when I was recording stuff. Maybe we should convince them to merge with rpmfusion. Btw, my FAS username is oget. I am reviewing the package. No worries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 01:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060136.m961aR4Q002921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #15 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-05 21:36:26 EDT --- cvs updated packages build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?userID=724 Now I'm supposed to push them through bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 02:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060207.m9627tSU009165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ismael at olea.org) | --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-05 22:07:54 EDT --- cvs updated packages build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?userID=724 Now I'm supposed to push them through bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 02:10:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060210.m962A3V5009786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #13 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-05 22:10:01 EDT --- cvs updated, but I generated a problem. I added an extra and wrong tag xhtml2fo-style-xsl-20051222-1 and koji gets mad trying to compile. I've tried to remove the tag without success. I'm sorry. for the other packages I've followed the precise process and things worked fine. It's my fault :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 02:23:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060223.m962NJQq011623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-05 22:23:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: htmlparser Short Description: HTML Parser, a Java library used to parse HTML Owners: olea Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 02:23:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060223.m962NYBk011752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-05 22:23:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: OmegaT Short Description: Computer Aid Translation tool Owners: olea Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 02:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 22:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060235.m962Zxg7013874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-05 22:35:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Removed Requires: per #10, at version fmit-0.97.7-3.fc9 Well, * I am not sure why this srpm has BuildRequires "qt-devel" (this is qt4) and "qt3-designer" (this is qt3) * Fedora specific compilation flags are not honored: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=862771 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags * When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060327.m963RDqa023585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 23:27:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Dear mtasaka, Thanks for the review. I stole the spec file directly from the fedora bouncycastle package and did not modify much except the %{name}'s. I knew it lacks certain things. All of the errors/flaws of my spec is inherited from the original spec file. > For 1.41-1 > > * Summary/Description > - Would you change Summary/Description more informative? > I don't think the Summary "Additional libraries" makes > much sense. > I added to Summary/Description. I think it's better now. > * Naming > - First of all, why is this srpm named as "bouncycastle-mail", > not "bcmail"? > Let me tell you the situation. The actual Bouncy Castle is a suite consisting of many libraries. bcprov* and bcmail are two of these libraries among many others. In Fedora, the bcprov library is already packed as "bouncycastle..rpm" but not "bcprov..rpm". Originally, I was going back and forth between the names: bcmail and bouncycastle-mail . I decided on the latter for the sake of staying consistent with the existing bouncycastle package. But I am fine with renaming the package. Let me know what you think. > * License > - License tag should be "MIT" > I know. See comment #4 of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465203 Fixed now. > * SourceURL > - SOURCE0 must be written with full URL: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > Done > * (Build)Requires > - I guess "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7" is better than > java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel. > Done > * unpackaging source / removing precompiled binaries > - Please unpack all sources in the tarball before removing > precompiled binaries to make it sure that all precompiled > binaries (including those in zip files if any) are > correctly removed. > > ! By the way when using "unzip" adding "-qq" option is > preferred. When using zip source tarball %setup -q > uses this. > Fixed > * absolute symlink > ----------------------------------------------------- > W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcmail-1.41.jar > /usr/share/java/bcmail-1.41.jar > ----------------------------------------------------- > - Mainly for chroot reason and so on, Fedora requests that all > symlinks should be relative, not absolute. > Fixed > ! %postun > ----------------------------------------------------- > %postun > if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then > if [ -x %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db ]; then > %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db > fi > fi > ----------------------------------------------------- > - While I am not familiar with gcj, would you explain why > it is sufficient that these scripts are called only when > [ $1 -eq 0 ] ? (please also refer to: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines ) > > * %attr > - Although GCJGuidelines uses it, the part "%attr(-,root,root)" > is completely redundant. My best answer will be: That's the way it is in the original bouncycastle.spec file. Maybe it remained from pre-F-8 days where no JDK was available. Now I took that part off and redesigned the parts regarding GCJ honoring the guidelines (except %attr). I added the if-clauses "%if %{with_gcj}" as the guidelines propose but this results in the rpmlint warning: bouncycastle-mail.spec:98: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} which is a wrong warning because noarch does not apply to that line (is this an rpmlint bug?). Should I take those "%if %{with_gcj}" off from the spec file?** I packaged bcmail because it is a requirement for iText (bug # 465511) which will let me enable the pdf plugin of tuxguitar in the future. I don't know much about the cryptography otherwise. New files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-mail.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-mail-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks again! *bcprov is the main library. The other libraries depend on it and they don't mean anything without it. ** You can build the package with "rpmbuild -ba --without gcj bouncycastle-mail.spec" now and this will produce a noarch rpm, without those arch dependent .so files produced by gcj. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060345.m963jIHb027580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-05 23:45:17 EDT --- The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? rpmlint says: 69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which use Greek or Cyrillic script, 69oldstandard-fonts.src: E: no-changelogname-tag 69oldstandard-fonts.src: W: non-coherent-filename oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm 69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm error checking signature of oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Do you really need these: sans-serif jp en sans-serif DejaVu Sans in the fontconfig file? The srpm file also seems to be corrupted I am afraid: 69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9 warning: user Package does not exist - using root warning: group Package does not exist - using root warning: user Package does not exist - using root warning: group Package does not exist - using root warning: user Ankur does not exist - using root warning: group Ankur does not exist - using root error: unpacking of archive failed on file /home/package-review/oldstandard-fonts/oldstand-1.0.ttf.zip;48e9897c: cpio: read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060349.m963nxqs028149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-05 23:49:58 EDT --- rpmlint on binary package: 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL-FAQ.txt 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL.txt 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which use Greek or Cyrillic script, 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. (In reply to comment #2) > The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named > 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? Rather I guess you intended to rename it to oldstandard-fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 03:54:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 23:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060354.m963seW7029102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-05 23:54:39 EDT --- OK then. What he needs is just a desktop-file-install call and that's it, as far as the .desktop file is concerned. I hope we all got over with the confusion now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:26:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060426.m964QNue003344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-06 00:26:23 EDT --- Builds in koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=862931 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060424.m964OYlH002739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-06 00:24:33 EDT --- Exactly. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] New: Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Summary: Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bnocera at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd.spec SRPM URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: obexd contains obex-client, a D-Bus service to allow sending files using the Obex Push protocol, common on mobile phones and other Bluetooth-equipped devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060431.m964VP82004329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-06 00:31:24 EDT --- That is a rather weird test to have in there, as the author has everything skipped: plan skip_all => 'Pod not available for individual methods in DBD::Multi, use DBI instead.'; So, I'm not sure it's normal, but it's certainly expected in this instance :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060452.m964q9nv008134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(huzaifas at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 00:52:08 EDT --- can you post updated SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060456.m964uxlj009064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #13 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 00:56:58 EDT --- look like no interest from reporter to build this package. Will Close this as NOTABUG this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060458.m964wsGm009287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(huzaifas at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 00:58:53 EDT --- yep. sorry i had to reinstall my laptop, will do that today :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:57:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060457.m964vo0R009162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cagney at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 00:57:49 EDT --- Can you request for CVS and build this package and Close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 04:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 00:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439163] Review Request: perl-HTML-Prototype - Generate HTML and Javascript for the Prototype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060459.m964xWop009528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439163 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(simon at sxw.org.uk) | --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 00:59:29 EDT --- Closing as NOTABUG now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 05:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 01:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060509.m9659gHU011326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 01:09:41 EDT --- how is this different from bluetooth-sendto? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 05:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 01:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060515.m965F2Wa012289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 01:15:01 EDT --- any updates here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 06:09:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 02:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060609.m9669Aup022583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #3 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-06 02:09:09 EDT --- It's a D-Bus service, whereas bluetooth-sendto is a front-end. bluetooth-sendto can use obex-data-server, or obexd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 06:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 02:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060640.m966e5vj029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 02:40:04 EDT --- Suggestions:- 1)rpmlint complained as obexd.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5 1:0.5-1.fc10 ==> easy fix change it to 0.5-1 obexd.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files obexd.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files /usr/bin/python ==> You may like to drop executable bits on send-files which is installed as %doc file. 2) Why Epoch is added in SPEC? I see COPYING is included as GPLv3 but sources have GPLv2 license text, But license in SPEC is correct. I tried to use bluetooth-sendto to send file to mobile but I think existing setup on rawhide is using obex-data-server to send file and if i try to remove it, its removing bluetooth packages. Then I tried to send file using send-files program as send-files Track1.mp3 but nothing appeared on screen and no files received on mobile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 06:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 02:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060648.m966mwFO030438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #5 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-06 02:48:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Suggestions:- > 1)rpmlint complained as > obexd.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5 1:0.5-1.fc10 > ==> easy fix change it to 0.5-1 Fix locally > obexd.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files > obexd.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files > /usr/bin/python > ==> You may like to drop executable bits on send-files which is installed as > %doc file. Fixed locally > 2) Why Epoch is added in SPEC? Cut'n'paste error. > I see COPYING is included as GPLv3 but sources have GPLv2 license text, But > license in SPEC is correct. That's probably because the autotools install the COPYING file if it's not present. > I tried to use bluetooth-sendto to send file to mobile but I think existing > setup on rawhide is using obex-data-server to send file and if i try to remove > it, its removing bluetooth packages. obex-client will be used automatically by bluetooth-sendto from bluez-gnome-1.8 only. > Then I tried to send file using send-files program as > send-files Track1.mp3 > but nothing appeared on screen and no files received on mobile. I don't think send-files is supposed to work for Obex Push targets. Try with a newer bluez-gnome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:22:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:22:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060722.m967Mmmk003604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-06 03:22:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sorry, could you elaborate on what this means? The package unikurd-fonts-web is sub-package of unikurd-fonts. I could create package unikurd-web-font and then package unikurd-penos-font, but I thought it will be better to have package unikurd-fonts and sub-package them according to actual font (web, penos, ...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060729.m967Tsov004449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 03:29:53 EDT --- Yes, please. Also please rebuild OmegaT related packages. If you meet some trouble please let me know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060749.m967nXli007751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-06 03:49:32 EDT --- Now that we are past beta for f10 surely it would be good to complete this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060754.m967sC6u008853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-06 03:54:11 EDT --- spec file is broken: ... + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + sed -i -e 's/CFLAGS =/CFLAGS +=/' Makefile ++ DESTDIR /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71618: line 42: DESTDIR: command not found ++ DOCDIR /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71618: line 42: DOCDIR: command not found + sed -i -e '/cp -R doc\/\* /d' Makefile ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060757.m967vd3l009775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 03:57:37 EDT --- As no updated SRPM is provided for reviewing, I am reviewing package given in initial comment. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863059 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM. But NOT for RPM. obexd.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files obexd.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5 1:0.5-1.fc10 obexd.i386: E: no-binary obexd.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/obexd-0.5/send-files /usr/bin/python ==> Ok. Assuming you will fix these at time of CVS import. + source files match upstream. 614f14a2024d13af5a936345c086cdb7 obexd-0.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package ==> you can add manually GPLv2 COPYING in next upstream release. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestion:- 1)Remove Epoch tag from SPEC APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 07:57:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 03:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060757.m967vG4V010251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-06 03:57:15 EDT --- This is wrong: %files ... %{perl_vendorlib}/Qooxdoo/JSONRPC.pm The package must own %{perl_vendorlib}/Qooxdoo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] New: Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext.spec Koji build: - F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863051 - F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863049 Description: Ruby-GetText-Package is a GNU GetText-like program for Ruby. The catalog file(po-file) is same format with GNU GetText. So you can use GNU GetText tools for maintaining. This package provides gem for Ruby-Gettext-Package. Note: There are so many rpmlint messages (2 errors, 490 warnings) * dangling-relative-symlink - ruby-gettext-package package Requires rubygem-gettext and installing both correctly resolves dangling relative symlinks, so these rpmlint messages can be ignored. * file-not-in-%lang - RubyGem wants all files to be installed under %geminstdir, so these messages cannot be suppressed. - Also some others are under %_docdir and rpmlint messages for those files are safe to ignore. * file-not-utf8 - These are gettext po files and converting character codes need not changing * zero-length - While I am not familiar with rails, I guess these files are actually needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:02:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060802.m9682JaB011012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 04:02:13 EDT --- SRPM URL is: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext-1.93.0-3.tmp.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:08:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060808.m9688UMQ012961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Marcel Holtmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcel at holtmann.org --- Comment #7 from Marcel Holtmann 2008-10-06 04:08:28 EDT --- I fixed the COPYING file in the upstream repository already. That is an upstream problem and has nothing to do with the packaging. The build dependency for dbus-glib-devel is bogus. It is glib-devel and dbus-devel. What do you need libtool for? It has two internal libraries, but these are statically linked ranlib. So just plain gcc will do its job. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060808.m9688uLO012960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 04:08:55 EDT --- I would suggest you to have a look at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages Did you try to contact the author to ask about this version issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060813.m968DxQt014108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 04:13:57 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863088 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 10174a16ec90bda1003c392b37c1b956 rw_RW.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:14:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060814.m968EVvn014208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 04:14:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863071 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 4a2cdc1bdd6e2e12d9e4e122c9f9cc84 upper_sorbian_spelling_dictionary-0.0.20060327.2-fx+tb+sm.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:14:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060814.m968EFll014094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 04:14:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863069 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 49a12561e0facb763fd68a200df8766f hunspell-nds-0.1.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226155] Merge Review: mod_perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060818.m968InCQ015098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-06 04:18:48 EDT --- I opened new bug #465743 for this problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:22:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060822.m968MNOw016203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-06 04:22:19 EDT --- I fixed the BRs some more, and removed the libtool dep (another cut'n'paste error). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: obexd Short Description: D-Bus service for Obex Client access Owners: hadess Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060826.m968QXfX017215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #9 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-06 04:26:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd.spec SRPM URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd-0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:26:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060826.m968QZlb017249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-06 04:26:33 EDT --- I'm not sure about desktop-file-install usage. There are no modification of desktop file, this desktop file is used for special purpose only for Plasma, so no application menu stuff and even desktop-file-validate is not developed for KDE specific desktop files (but warnings are aware of KDE specific values - see --warn-kde options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060832.m968W1iq018508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-06 04:32:00 EDT --- Ok I have removed the -devel package and I did not do the shared library because I do not know any project that needs those headers files. I am keeping this package as simple as possible. SPEC http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3.spec SRPM http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/primer3-1.1.4-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] New: Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Summary: Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pingou at pingoured.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-GeneR.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-GeneR-2.11.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Package manipulating nucleotidic sequences (Embl, Fasta, GenBank) PS: I had to package the version 2.11.1 which is on the devel part of Bioconductor because the version 2.10.0 (on the stable part) did not compile on gcc 4.3.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060837.m968b8tE019405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-06 04:37:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I fixed the COPYING file in the upstream repository already. That is an > upstream problem and has nothing to do with the packaging. > Agree. > The build dependency for dbus-glib-devel is bogus. It is glib-devel and > dbus-devel. > > What do you need libtool for? It has two internal libraries, but these are > statically linked ranlib. So just plain gcc will do its job. You are correct. I completely forgotten to check unnecessary BRs. I now just did scratch build with new BRs and its build failed(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863125). Change I did is BuildRequires: dbus-devel,glib-devel BuildRequires: bluez-libs-devel >= 4.0 BuildRequires: openobex-devel (In reply to comment #9) > Spec URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd.spec > SRPM URL: http://hadess.fedorapeople.org/obexd/obexd-0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm So, as per updated SRPM BRs should be BuildRequires: dbus-devel,glib2-devel BuildRequires: bluez-libs-devel >= 4.0 BuildRequires: openobex-devel which is working fine. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863145 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060840.m968eXkK020032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(marcel at holtmann.o | |rg) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060845.m968jP7X021264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 08:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 04:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060857.m968vxFW023814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #9 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 04:57:58 EDT --- Well I never saw examples opposing what you say (e.g. the spec file of kde-plasma-lancelot, which is approved, doesn't use dekstop-file-install). When I install the package it shows in the Add Widget list, and when I uninstall the package it vanishes from that list. So in short, it works as it is supposed to. Let's hear from the other auditers then we can approve the package since it seems otherwise flawless. (In your spec file I just saw the usage of %{cmake} for configuring the package which takes care of the %{optflags}. I must have missed it in the first pass. Hence you can ignore about my comment about %{optflags}) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:04:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060904.m9694PDK025430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-06 05:04:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-nds Short Description: Lowlands Saxon hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:02:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060902.m9692PYE025064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-06 05:02:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-rw Short Description: Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:02:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060902.m9692sw4025165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #24 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-06 05:02:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I'm curious to know why you didn't add the Branches F-9 and F-10 ? Indeed, I forgot that there is a F-10 branch already. I didn't add F-8 and F-9 because it would break the SDK installations of the available Cell SDKs which provide spu-binutils. > I'm willing to list this package to be part of the Fedora Electronic Lab. Thanks! > I'm inviting you guys to subscribe to this low traffic mailing list :) > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list OK, I'm registered now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:02:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060902.m9692oIv025029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #16 from Kaj J. Niemi 2008-10-06 05:02:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319527) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319527) pkgconfig for 2.0.2 protobuf.pc.in with library version 2.0.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:03:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060903.m9693m8l025223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #17 from Kaj J. Niemi 2008-10-06 05:03:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319528) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319528) protobuf-pkgconfig-autotools.patch updated for 2.0.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060903.m9693So6025147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-06 05:03:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-hsb Short Description: Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:05:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060905.m9695Uvg025869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #18 from Kaj J. Niemi 2008-10-06 05:05:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319530) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319530) protobuf 2.0.2 patch diff to 2.0.1 - make compiling with python optional (rhel4 has 2.3 which isn't good enough or something) - build java implementation - build java implementation with gcj feel free to change the defaults or make them nicer, thanks ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060910.m969A91o026934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pm at datasphere.ch) | --- Comment #9 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-06 05:10:08 EDT --- Never mind for the delay. Yes, I'm still interested in having this package in Fedora, since there is no current alternative in it to provide this service. Please also note that upstream does not publish new releases and does not respond to patch proposals, bug reports, etc. I do not know if this is a blocker for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:08:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060908.m96989aJ026446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-06 05:08:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You could use > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep > header files timestamps. Improved. > > You could do make check in %check. > Done. > rpmlint output is ignorable: > xcb-util-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > > I'd propose a shorter summary: > > Convenience libraries sitting on top of libxcb > > And for the devel summary I propose: > > Development and header files for xcb-util > Both done. > There is a license issue, wm/reply_formats.c notice refers to COPYING > which isn't present. > Probably somewhat more of such problems, see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17078 ... > In rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la, the -r is not needed. And the > -f isn't needeed too, I prefer personnally being warned when a file > I had to remove isn't present anymore. Good idea, why not. Done. http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.0-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:13:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060913.m969DN39027656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Kaj J. Niemi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #319530|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #19 from Kaj J. Niemi 2008-10-06 05:13:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319531) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319531) protobuf 2.0.2 patch diff to 2.0.1 working patch, previous was missing .jar at the end of symlink creation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: plautrba at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Net::Daemon is an abstract base class for implementing portable server applications in a very simple way. The module is designed for Perl 5.006 (and higher) and ithreads, but can work with fork() and Perl 5.004. The Net::Daemon class offers methods for the most common tasks a daemon needs: Starting up, logging, accepting clients, authorization, restricting its own environment for security and doing the true work. You only have to override those methods that aren't appropriate for you, but typically inheriting will safe you a lot of work anyways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:26:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060926.m969QuIm030806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #37 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-06 05:26:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > I can't find libev-devel ?? In rawhide. > See bug 458785 for srpm package. > How comes lua files are not in %_datadir? They are not platform > independent? > The are platform independent. Only rc.lua is not in %_datadir, but this is config file for awesome. > It is a bit strange to have an API for a window manager. Is it > because lua is an interpreted language, so that the API has to > come with runtime? > I probably don't understand... Awesome is using the lua files for it's own manipulation with windows and stuff. They are necessary to be bundled with runtime. Let me know if you have other comments. > I think that it is wrong to have: > %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/%{name}/themes/default > this file should be under the control of upstream/packager. > Isn't it possible to override what is there with something in > %_sysconfdir? > It took me a long time to decide whether to shield that file or not. It's not possible to move it to /etc, I opened a bug in upstream but was closed wontfix (sorry cant find it in the crappy flyspray http://awesome.naquadah.org/bugs/). It's possible to have it in user ~/.config/awesome. I can change it from config file to ordinary one, if you wish, no problem. > Build stops with > -- package 'cairo-xcb' not found > I don't have libev-devel, it may be the reason. No. the problem is cairo's missing XCB support (just Xlib). It necessary to recompile it with (--enable-xcb). See bug 465759. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060933.m969XxZW032294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 --- Comment #45 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:33:57 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:34:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250971] Review Request: ivtv-utils - userspace tools for iTVC15/16 and CX23415/16 driven devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060934.m969YEkG032361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250971 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060940.m969eh1k001586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:40:41 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060940.m969erea001649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060945.m969jQF3002855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060945.m969jGKP002641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:45:15 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:43:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060943.m969hwji002015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:43:57 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:44:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060944.m969i9Fp002080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060943.m969hg9n001945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-06 05:43:41 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is silent. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum libss7-1.0.1.tar.gz* 36d86c2b6a61512a0f61d48a8f6ff64c libss7-1.0.1.tar.gz 36d86c2b6a61512a0f61d48a8f6ff64c libss7-1.0.1.tar.gz.orig [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + No additional build dependencies. + The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package does not create additional directories. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files + All, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The library file(s) that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + Devel packages requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency. + The packages does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + All filenames in rpm package are be valid UTF-8. I have only one suggestion - please include LICENSE in %doc. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060949.m969nfO7003651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060949.m969nVhN003567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #15 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:49:30 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:47:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060947.m969l05t003140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:46:58 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060950.m969oj69004091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 05:50:44 EDT --- Btw, you can also use "sed" to replace items in the original .desktop file and "echo some_new_items >> file" to add items to the .desktop file; so that you won't have to add a new source file. Don't forget to change the icon name in the .desktop file to rakarrack.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060955.m969tUUj005483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #32 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:55:24 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060953.m969rAuG004715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #12 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:53:09 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:51:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060951.m969ptWf004436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #5 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:51:54 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:56:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060956.m969u76V005744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:53:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060953.m969ri2X004879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060953.m969rLoM004782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:52:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060952.m969qCne004521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060952.m969qi0j004620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #11 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-06 05:52:43 EDT --- http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/libev/libev.spec http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/libev/libev-3.44-1.el5.src.rpm Mail sent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444933] Review Request: cairo-dock - Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060957.m969vinH005809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444933 --- Comment #16 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-06 05:57:42 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 09:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 05:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444933] Review Request: cairo-dock - Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810060958.m969w5T1005926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444933 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226549] Merge Review: Xaw3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061015.m96AFppA009774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226549 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-06 06:15:50 EDT --- Hi, While working on fixing xfig bug 436998 it turned out to be an Xaw3d bug, and the current state of Xaw3d screamed fix me (these merge reviews really are a necessity). So besides fixing the bug I've also cleaned up the package (fixing things like actually applying the included patches, amazing). While I'm waiting for my cvs access to be approved (former core packages, ACL's closed ), I've put the srpm of my fixed / cleaned version here: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/Xaw3d-1.5E-12.fc10.src.rpm I've done a scratch build of it here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863235 rpmlint is clean A quick review of this new version would be much appreciated, I'll do any necessary fixes myself, so we should be able to wrap this up quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061017.m96AHRgc009648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-06 06:17:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: spu-binutils Short Description: A GNU collection of binary utilities Owners: jroth Branches: F-10 InitialCC: adrian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:29:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061029.m96ATB55011812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr Blocks|452427 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:29:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061029.m96ATCCM011837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|458785 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061028.m96ASR5a012068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061029.m96ATYnw012262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|465759 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:28:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061028.m96ASQgi012039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458785, 465759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061034.m96AYGNO012946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-06 06:34:15 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: perl-qooxdoo-compat.src: E: unknown-key GPG#7666df64 -> ignorable 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Pac kaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: LGPLv2 or EPL [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 2ab0cc8b437e09fbba1b9ccef064c826eaf06b8d qooxdoo-0.7.3-backend.zip [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines . [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [!] Package must own all directories that it creates. See issue 1 [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested on anything but devel.x86_64, but it is a standard noarch perl module, should build everywhere [?] Package functions as described. Not yet tested, I have to rebuild smokeping. but since it's basically the same module as before, there should be no surprises [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ISSUES 1. The module is stored as /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Qooxdoo/JSONRPC.pm but the folder itself is not owned. Thanks Ralf for the second set of eyes. Please fix the above before commiting to CVS. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061038.m96AcTEv014124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-06 06:38:28 EDT --- I am very curious: why did you add Requires: perl >= 5.6.0 if the description says The module is designed for Perl 5.006 (and higher) and ithreads, but can work with fork() and Perl 5.004. ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:52:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465484] Review Request: hunspell-rw - Kinyarwanda hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061052.m96AqTVM016568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465484 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:00:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:00:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061100.m96B0LVl018396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452427 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061100.m96B0JRW018365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |458785, 465759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 10:59:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 06:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226549] Merge Review: Xaw3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061059.m96Ax5fH018065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226549 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-06 06:59:04 EDT --- Seems that Stepan is the maintainer now. Putting him in CC. Stepan, is it on purpose that the commit for group member is disabled? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465483] Review Request: hunspell-nds - Lowlands Saxon dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061105.m96B58cJ019672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465483 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465482] Review Request: hunspell-hsb - Upper Sorbian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061105.m96B50Cr019323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465482 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:23:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061123.m96BNnJc023332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #37 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-06 07:23:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Module system implemented after a lot of work. Please test on other > architectures than x86_64. It seems to build and install properly on my i386. > > Have a look at > > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.10.rc3.fc9.src.rpm > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 11:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 07:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061144.m96Bi5GB028049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-06 07:44:04 EDT --- desktop-file-install (or desktop-file-validate) usage is *required*. Homework: if that's not clear to anyone, go read that section of the guidelines again. :) One primary purpose of that is to ensure correctness/validation of the .desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 12:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061204.m96C4Qrf032553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #11 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-06 08:04:25 EDT --- As I understand it: - desktop-file-install is not required for this package - desktop-file-install MUST be used if the package does not install the file or there are changes desired to the .desktop file (such as add/removing categories, etc) - desktop-file-validate can check desktop file only partially and complaints about KDE specific extensions (so these are unchecked). I can add desktop-file-validate to SPEC file but then we need to update other Plasma (KDE?) packages without at least d-f-validate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 12:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061213.m96CDnrk002528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-06 08:13:48 EDT --- > As I understand it: - desktop-file-install is not required for this package As a (co)author of the dfi guideline, I can tell you that is contrary to the wording and intent of it :) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage says bluntly: "It is not simply enough to just include the .desktop file in the package, one MUST run desktop-file-install OR desktop-file-validate in %install (and have BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils)" Feel free to contact me off-list/bugzilla, to see where any misunderstanding comes from and to find ways to reword the guideline to make it more clear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 12:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061229.m96CT8Xn005664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 --- Comment #13 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-06 08:29:06 EDT --- OK, my bad for being like a slashdot'er and commenting without actually looking at the spec. At issue here is whether the app appears in the usual menus and/or in %_datadir/applications. Answer: no. Conclusion: no need for desktop-file-install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061300.m96D0TQC012867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #2 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-06 09:00:27 EDT --- I changed it to fedora perl template default: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version) as in other perl packages. Spec URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:02:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061302.m96D2VTG013280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-06 09:02:30 EDT --- Fixed build for EPEL4. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3-3.3.3-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061301.m96D1P9k013122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-06 09:01:24 EDT --- Fixed building for EPEL4. Couldn't get it to compile in mock under F9, however, it fails at the mpi compiler detection stage. As RHEL5.2, RHEL4.7 uses mpi-selector, so the same commands should work. Maybe this is just due to some binary incompatibility problem..? http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.12.rc3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061308.m96D8thp015134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-06 09:08:55 EDT --- You forgot to add the corresponding changelog entry. And rpmlint is not happy at all: perl-Net-Daemon.src: E: description-line-too-long Net::Daemon is an abstract base class for implementing portable server applications in a very simple way. The module is designed for Perl 5.006 and ithreads (and higher), but can work with fork() and Perl 5.004. perl-Net-Daemon.src: E: description-line-too-long The Net::Daemon class offers methods for the most common tasks a daemon needs: Starting up, logging, accepting clients, authorization, restricting its own environment for security and doing the true work. You only have to override those methods that aren't appropriate for you, but typically inheriting will safe you a lot of work anyways. --> Please trim the lines at 80 chars perl-Net-Daemon.src: W: invalid-license GPL perl-Net-Daemon.src: W: invalid-license Artistic --> please replace with "GPL+ or Artistic" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061339.m96DdFIU022120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-06 09:39:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libss7 Short Description: SS7 protocol services to applications Owners: jcollie Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: jcollie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061346.m96DkYNk023966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #4 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-06 09:46:33 EDT --- Added Changelogs entries, License replaced, lines trimed. Spec URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:55:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061355.m96DtVka025377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Bug 459908 depends on bug 459915, which changed state. Bug 459915 Summary: Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:55:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061355.m96DtU2x025343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 09:55:28 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. When you think the submitted packages can be moved to stable repository, please modify (edit) the request on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061355.m96Dt1S0025784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Bug 459908 depends on bug 459916, which changed state. Bug 459916 Summary: Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061354.m96DswFg025745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 09:54:57 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. When you think the submitted packages can be moved to stable repository, please modify (edit) the request on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061355.m96DtnwE026231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #39 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 09:55:48 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. When you think the submitted packages can be moved to stable repository, please modify (edit) the request on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 13:57:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 09:57:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061357.m96DvCbR026683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-06 09:57:11 EDT --- The review is completed, unless someone thinks that I need to look over the package again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 14:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061411.m96EBDS7029946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-06 10:11:11 EDT --- ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 14:08:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061408.m96E8F3Z029002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-06 10:08:14 EDT --- I am far from being a perl guy, but I find odd that almost all tests are disabled / removed. Are you _sure_ this is a desired behaviour ? During my programming classes I was taught that failing tests indicate a problem which should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 14:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061409.m96E9ix6029283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-06 10:09:43 EDT --- -------------------- This package (primer3) is APPROVED by me -------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 14:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187317] Review Request: mindi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061420.m96EKjCg031910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187317 --- Comment #38 from Bruno Cornec 2008-10-06 10:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > We have an issue here. Fedora packages MUST be able to be built using ONLY the > content of the Fedora repository. Hence the Require: mindi-busybox will prevent > building mindi, as long as mindi-busybox is not a valid Fedora package. And I > do not see even a review request for such a beast. Yes. As the global project mondo was needing also buffer and afio, I chose to began with those bricks which are external. I can easily make a request for mindi-busybox once those have been accepted. > Note that I believe that a fork of an existing package would not be accepted > without an approval from the packaging committee. I am sure that a proper > solution could be found, once the correct arguments are presented. As already entioned many times, we nee a very well known version of busybox during restore time (having some functions activated and other not) which we rely deeply on. Upstream is maintaining such a project based on an older but more stable (at least known) version of busybox in order to avoid unexpected issues. THat may evolve in the future but is now required. Hope this helps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 14:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 10:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061445.m96Ej4MY004529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 10:45:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * Naming > > - First of all, why is this srpm named as "bouncycastle-mail", > > not "bcmail"? > > > Let me tell you the situation. The actual Bouncy Castle is a suite consisting > of many libraries. bcprov* and bcmail are two of these libraries among many > others. In Fedora, the bcprov library is already packed as > "bouncycastle..rpm" but not "bcprov..rpm". > > Let me know what you think. - It may be better that "Provides: bcmail = %{version}-%{release}" is added (if you think if it is worth doing) > I added the if-clauses "%if %{with_gcj}" as the guidelines propose but this > results in the rpmlint warning: > bouncycastle-mail.spec:98: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package > %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} > which is a wrong warning because noarch does not apply to that line (is this an > rpmlint bug?). Should I take those "%if %{with_gcj}" off from the spec file?** - Please ignore this rpmlint complaint for this case. You can also use ---------------------------------------------------------- %if %{with_gcj} %{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed/bcmail-%{version}.jar %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} %endif ---------------------------------------------------------- > *bcprov is the main library. The other libraries depend on it and they don't > mean anything without it. - Then perhaps "Requires: bouncycastle (= %{version})" is needed? Other things are okay. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (bouncycastle-mail) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way would you have some time to review my review request (bug 465740)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 15:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061509.m96F9Ptm010343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #6 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-06 11:09:24 EDT --- Tests work fine locally. But they try to open INET/UNIX socket, bind to a port and connect. And if I try to build this package with Koji, tests fail on Unexpected return from Bind(). and also: Cannot connect: Connection refused at t/ithreadm.t line 63. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 15:12:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061512.m96FCB2l011349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-06 11:12:10 EDT --- Thanks wolfy and Ralf! Updated package - Fix ownership of dir spec: n/a, seems like sshd @ fedorapeople.org is down srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=863922&name=perl-qooxdoo-compat-0.7.3-2.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=863921 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-qooxdoo-compat Short Description: Perl backend for Qooxdoo Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465830] New: Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465830 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mk-0.20051126-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Macedonian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465831] New: Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465831 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tl-0.20050109-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Tagalog hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061620.m96GKCcm026228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|kde-plasma-quickacce | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061617.m96GHpYi025695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Alias| |kde-plasma-quickacce Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 12:17:50 EDT --- No problem rdieter, we all do mistakes :) Well... This package is good to go: --------------------------------------------------------- This package (kde-plasma-quickaccess) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:23:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061623.m96GN2mW026785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-10-06 12:23:01 EDT --- I need to be sponsored to maintain this package. Jonrob and I were planning on co-maintaining it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061621.m96GLrql026605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-06 12:21:52 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061629.m96GTFfX027134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-06 12:29:14 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 16:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 12:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061646.m96GkUcT031673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |bouncycastle-mail - |bouncycastle-mail - |Additional libraries for |SMIME/CMS packages for |Bouncy Castle |Bouncy Castle Alias| |bouncycastle-mail Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 12:46:29 EDT --- Thanks, I added them since they may help some people. I'll have a look at your package now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bouncycastle-mail Short Description: S/MIME and CMS libraries for Bouncy Castle Owners: oget Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061708.m96H83EF004063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #8 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-06 13:08:02 EDT --- Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/printoxx.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/printoxx-1.6-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint is silent, rebuild under mock and koji is OK. I fixed the problem in specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061708.m96H8lMF004704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 13:08:46 EDT --- For 1.5.1-0.1.rc1 * About permission/ownership arround %_sysconfdir/ocspd - Perhaps you want below? -------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd/c* %attr(700,ocspd,root) %dir %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd/private %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/ocspd/ocspd.conf -------------------------------------------------- When %dir is used the directory only is included. * configure option - build.log shows: -------------------------------------------------- 229 default ocspd user : ocspd 230 default ocspd group : daemon 231 enable engine support : true 232 enable semaphores : true 233 enable debug messages : false 234 with openca-prefix : /usr/OpenCA 235 install prefix : /usr -------------------------------------------------- Is the line 234 (openca-prefix) okay? * autoheader - build.log shows: -------------------------------------------------- 246 configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-shared 247 + make -j4 248 Making all in src 249 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/openca-ocspd-1.5.1-rc1/src' 250 cd .. && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/openca-ocspd-1.5.1-rc1/build/missing --run autoheader 251 rm -f stamp-h1 252 touch config.h.in 253 make all-am 254 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/openca-ocspd-1.5.1-rc1/src' -------------------------------------------------- * configure option "--disable-shared" doesn't seem to be used * calling autoheader beforehand is also needed. * About creating user - Now I recommend to follow this way: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups * %changelog - In %changelog please remove ".fc8" part (because this part differs between branches) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:12:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061712.m96HC2wO004903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:32:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061732.m96HW0oU008916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Bug 443771 depends on bug 454215, which changed state. Bug 454215 Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-06 13:31:58 EDT --- Do you have tested it previously in Rawhide ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=864292 Failed to find wine-devel on x86_64...Might be a temporary problem... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061735.m96HZiMr010422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-06 13:35:44 EDT --- testing F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=864350 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061748.m96Hmnur012045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #14 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-06 13:48:48 EDT --- [olea at lisergia xhtml2fo-style-xsl]$ cd devel/ [olea at lisergia devel]$ cvs tag -d xhtml2fo-style-xsl-20051222-1 ERROR: Tag removal not allowed for tag xhtml2fo-style-xsl-20051222-1 cvs tag: Pre-tag check failed cvs [tag aborted]: correct the above errors first! This tag prevents koji to build it for f-8 and f-9. Any suggestion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 17:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 13:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] New: Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Summary: Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/logstalgia/logstalgia.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=864378&name=logstalgia-0.9.1-1.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=864377 description: logstalgia (aka ApachePong) replays or streams a standard website access log (eg access.log) as a retro arcade game-like simulation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061805.m96I5BPR016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-06 14:05:10 EDT --- If you cannot rebuild OmegaT on F-9/8 right now, please - visit https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ and login - submit a request to make F-8/9 vldocking/htmlparser tagged as dist-f{8,9}-override. When submitting requests on fedorahosted trac, please provide the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) information of vldocking/htmlparser needed to build OmegaT. After rel-eng team tags those packages, you will be able to build OmegaT on F-9/8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:30:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061830.m96IUa5m021369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #26 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-06 14:30:35 EDT --- koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=864417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465858] Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061839.m96IdWVW022306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-06 14:39:31 EDT --- Builds in mock for epel5 and Rawhide. RPMLint silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465858] New: Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465858 Summary: Package Review: afpfs-ng - Apple Filing Protocol client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPECS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/afpfs-ng.spec SRPMS: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/afpfs-ng-0.8.1-1.el5.src.rpm A command line client to access files exported from Mac OS system via AppleTalk or TCP using Apple Filing Protocol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:37:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061837.m96IbJZM022764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #29 from Sylvain Beucler 2008-10-06 14:37:17 EDT --- Thanks for your review :) I'll wait for the 'testing' update request to be moderated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061853.m96Irg8q025030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #7 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-06 14:53:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > For -3: > > * %version macro > - Please consider to use %{version} macro (also see: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D > I wasn't sure how best to apply this here, can you provide some more detail as to what you mean? > * CFLAGS in noarch rpm > - The part CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" is not needed because > this is noarch. > Oops - fixed. > * Macros in %changelog or comments > - In %changelog or comments, use %% instead of % (e.g. > "add doc to %%files, add ..") so that macros won't be > expanded. > Done. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw-1.3.2-4.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:58:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061858.m96IwPnN025822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Moschny 2008-10-06 14:58:24 EDT --- Well, I didn't know that the build system is strictly non-multilib. Everything went fine in my local mock builds. So, I see two options here: - disable vst hosting capabilities completely on 64bit. - make a subpackage for the vst host, and build that 32bit, but make it usable on 64bit also. The latter is more user-friendly, but needs some patching of the (c)makefiles. If time permits, I'll try to go that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 18:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061857.m96Ivl6E025770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-06 14:57:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > - The license tag should be "MIT and BSD and ZPLv2.0 and > Bitstream Vera and OFL". > Done. > * Source0 > - Please add revision number of svn also to the name of > Source0 tarball (i.e. pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz) > Done. > * python modules dependency > - Please check if all python modules related rpms are correctly > added to Requires. > * For example chempy/fast/__init__.py contains: > ------------------------------------------------ > 6 from Numeric import * > 7 from Precision import * > ------------------------------------------------ > I guess pymol should have "Requires: python-numeric" (maybe even > more) > I did my best to double-check all the python imports, everything should be covered now. > > * optflags > - build.log shows: > ------------------------------------------------ > 226 creating build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/layer5 > 227 gcc -pthread -DNDEBUG -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 > -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe > -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fPIC -D_PYMOL_MODULE -D_PYMOL_INLINE > -D_PYMOL_FREETYPE -D_HAVE_LIBPNG -Iov/src -Ilayer0 -Ilayer1 -Ilayer2 -Ilayer3 > -Ilayer4 -Ilayer5 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/python2.5 -c > ov/src/OVContext.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.5/ov/src/OVContext.o -ffast-math > -funroll-loops -O3 > ------------------------------------------------ > Please remove "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3". These flags makes > debugging difficult, or changes calculation precision. > Done - I set up the optflags as just "-O2" - is this sufficient? > * Document > - Please also add the following file(s) to %doc > ------------------------------------------------- > AUTHORS > ------------------------------------------------- > Done. > * generic rpmlint issue > ------------------------------------------------- > pymol.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-3 1.1-3.20080912svn3419.fc10 > pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/feedback2.c > pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/feedback2.h > pymol-debuginfo.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/pymol-1.1/contrib/champ/err2.c Fixed. > ------------------------------------------------- > - Change the %changelog entry like below: > ------------------------------------------------- > * Thu Oct 02 2008 Tim Fenn - 1.1-3-20080912svn3419 > - fix release tag, add egg-info, minor fixes done. > * segv > - By the way for pymol causes segv with > ------------------------------------------------- > pymol-1.1-3.20080912svn3419.fc10.i386 > mesa-libGL-7.1-0.37.fc10.i386 > python-2.5.2-1.fc10.i386 > ------------------------------------------------- > when just launching pymol. > gdb log attached. I can't reproduce this on my F8 machine, I'll try to find a machine for F10 testing. I'll also get in touch with upstream and see if there are any suggestions there. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-4.20080912svn3419.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 19:02:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061902.m96J23Qw027214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #11 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-06 15:02:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > By the way output from pymol seems to be saying that this is a pre-version > of 1.1. In such cases please follow: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > i.e. release number should be 0.3.20080912svn3419%{?dist}, for example. I'll check with upstream - according to the website, its an "official" 1.1 release with fixes/patches backported from 1.2: http://www.pymol.org/news.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 19:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 15:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810061921.m96JLxTc000787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 15:21:58 EDT --- The package looks very good. Here are my notes ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files Could you BuildRequire gettext and use the %find_lang macro as depicted in the Guidelines? Will this cause a problem? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * The package does not use the macro's consistently. e.g. the lines %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}%{gemdir}/bin/ ... rm -rf %{buildroot} cause some inconsistency. Also you use the "%{__command}" notation for some commands and "command" notation for the others. One example: "mv" should be "%{__mv}" if you want to be consistent. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby : The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems You only have BuildRequires: ruby(rubygems) Requires: ruby(rubygems) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Requires: ruby(rubygems) Requires: irb Don't you need to require a specific version (or above)? (just asking) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- * If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and as a straight Ruby library without Gem support, it must be packaged as a Gem first. To make it available to code that does not use Ruby Gems, a subpackage called ruby-%{gemname} must be created in the rubygem-%{gemname} package such that But your straight library is named ruby-%{gemname}-package. Can you explain why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 20:36:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062036.m96KaCLo016326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-06 16:36:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-quickaccess Short Description: Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders Owners: jreznik Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 20:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 16:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062058.m96KwE05020367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-06 16:58:13 EDT --- > # The source for this package was pulled from upstream's vcs. Use the > # following commands to generate the tarball: > # svn co https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 > # tar cvzf pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz pymol-1.1 > Source0: pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz - More exactly: svn co -r 3419 https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 so you don't get the current revision. - Group: Development/Tools Wouln't Applications/Engineering be a better choice? This is a atomistic visualisation program, after all. (Applications/Science would of course be better if it existed..) - Separate BuildRequires and Requires should be made for each required package. - export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" Is there some reason not to use %optflags? - typo %%doc in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 21:07:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062107.m96L7ANd022549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-06 17:07:08 EDT --- Also, python-devel is redundant since python-setuptools-devel requires it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 21:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062116.m96LGWxq024831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #14 from Gianluca Sforna 2008-10-06 17:16:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > - More exactly: > svn co -r 3419 > https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 > > so you don't get the current revision. right > > > - Group: Development/Tools > > Wouln't Applications/Engineering be a better choice? This is a atomistic > visualisation program, after all. (Applications/Science would of course be > better if it existed..) IIRC the Group tag is not really used these days, groups are composed from comps.xml, so it's not that really important. > - export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" > > Is there some reason not to use %optflags? yes, you should use the standard %optflags > > - typo %%doc in changelog. Nope, in changelog you need to use %% to avoid the macro expansion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 21:28:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062128.m96LSA10028517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #44 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-06 17:28:09 EDT --- Shouldn't kde supportr be build in the default case? That would mean using %bcond_with kde Now the %post -p isn't used anymore, you have to add explicitely: Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig A suggestion: in the spec file, lines are not cut at 80 columns, though it is quite convenient when editing in a console since this is the default width, and also it is in general more readable, longer lines are, in my opinion, less easy to read. Of course this doesn't apply to long lines that are long because of an usrl or a string that shouldn't be cut. The suggestion would be to cut at 80 columns more systematically. This is only a suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 21:34:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 17:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062134.m96LYF60027823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-06 17:34:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > - Group: Development/Tools > > > > Wouln't Applications/Engineering be a better choice? This is a atomistic > > visualisation program, after all. (Applications/Science would of course be > > better if it existed..) > > IIRC the Group tag is not really used these days, groups are composed from > comps.xml, so it's not that really important. Still, Development/Tools is not the right place for pymol. > > - typo %%doc in changelog. > > Nope, in changelog you need to use %% to avoid the macro expansion Duh, of course. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 22:49:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 18:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062249.m96MnG7w009819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #45 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-06 18:49:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Shouldn't kde supportr be build in the default case? > That would mean using > > %bcond_with kde Yes, off course. Why we may want disable kde support by default? > Now the %post -p isn't used anymore By link what you provided befor it is mentioned as alternative. > you have to add explicitely: > > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Hm... Sure? Din not /sbin/ldconfig generic?? > A suggestion: in the spec file, lines are not cut at 80 columns, though it is > quite convenient when editing in a console since this is the default width, and > also it is in general more readable, longer lines are, in my opinion, less > easy to read. Of course this doesn't apply to long lines that are long because > of an usrl or a string that shouldn't be cut. The suggestion would be to cut at > 80 columns more systematically. This is only a suggestion. In most cases, in package descriptions and other I'm wrap text in width of 80 characters... I will try to be careful in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 23:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062303.m96N3CVx013032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #46 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-06 19:03:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #44) > > Shouldn't kde supportr be build in the default case? > > That would mean using > > > > %bcond_with kde > Yes, off course. Why we may want disable kde support by default? Crap, I said the reverse of the correct thing. To have it defaulted to true, it should be: %bcond_without kde > > Now the %post -p isn't used anymore > By link what you provided befor it is mentioned as alternative. It is not a problem, in fact you have to do it that way. > > you have to add explicitely: > > > > Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig > > Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig > Hm... Sure? Din not /sbin/ldconfig generic?? Think about install in chroots and more importantly installation order. > In most cases, in package descriptions and other I'm wrap text in width of 80 > characters... > I will try to be careful in the future. In %description it is not a suggestion, it is a must, but you made it right. But there are other places in th espec where you don't do it (in the tags part, in %changelog...). Still it is only a suggestion in these places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 23:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062346.m96Nkcxr021755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu --- Comment #2 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-06 19:46:37 EDT --- Initial review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [FIXME?: covers this list and more] [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. sha1sum checksum: b81b0785283651eb0814998af2895216855cf742 mnemosyne-1.1.1-r1.tgz [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. rpmlint mnemosyne-1.1.1-2.r1.fc9.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 6 23:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 19:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810062357.m96NvtRZ024196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwalsh at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-06 19:57:54 EDT --- When I use the NetworkManager plugin, I get this... host=macbook.infradead.org type=AVC msg=audit(1223329615.277:1689): avc: denied { read write } for pid=13785 comm="openconnect" name="tun" dev=tmpfs ino=1866 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:tun_tap_device_t:s0 tclass=chr_file host=macbook.infradead.org type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1223329615.277:1689): arch=c000003e syscall=2 success=yes exit=4 a0=40a8c1 a1=2 a2=1e5 a3=7fffb4a6cc90 items=0 ppid=13768 pid=13785 auid=500 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=68 comm="openconnect" exe="/usr/bin/openconnect" subj=unconfined_u:system_r:NetworkManager_t:s0 key=(null) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 00:32:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070032.m970WEC8031051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-06 20:32:13 EDT --- Hi, I just went through your package. It needs some work. Here are my notes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- The summary needs to be beefed up and more informative IMHO. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- When I run the "pyroman" script I get the error: No rule files found in directory './examples/base'! I think you need to change the default_rules_path in the launching script (to %{_sysconfdir}/%name via 'sed', for instance). --------------------------------------------------------------- In the %files section, we prefer to use %defattr(-, root, root, -) Also %attr(0644, root, root) are redundant. Instead you should use install -pm 644 pyroman/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ and install -Dpm 644 doc/pyroman.8 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man8/pyroman.8 in the %install section. Also make sure you use the switch -p of the "install" command to preserve the timestamps whenever it makes sense (usually for the non-compiled files). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- License is MIT, not GPL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: python-devel is redundant. Package will build without it. Requires: python is not necessary either. rpmbuild will pick that up. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can further replace dir %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/*.py* with %{python_sitelib}/%{name} to improve the spec file. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Make sure you make use of %{name} and %{version} macros in addition to the predefined directory macros. For instance, you use install -D bin/pyroman $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/sbin/pyroman in one line but %{_sbindir}/%{name} on the other, which is inconsistent and not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 00:46:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] New: Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Summary: Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cra at wpi.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Judy is a C library that provides a state-of-the-art core technology that implements a sparse dynamic array. Judy arrays are declared simply with a null pointer. A Judy array consumes memory only when it is populated, yet can grow to take advantage of all available memory if desired. Judy's key benefits are scalability, high performance, and memory efficiency. A Judy array is extensible and can scale up to a very large number of elements, bounded only by machine memory. Since Judy is designed as an unbounded array, the size of a Judy array is not pre-allocated but grows and shrinks dynamically with the array population. This is a requirement for another package I intend to submit: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs (a Teredo client/server/relay) I also need a sponsor for cvs access. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 00:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 20:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070054.m970sQkK003238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 01:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070100.m9710bsj004234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu --- Comment #2 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-06 21:00:35 EDT --- *** Bug 465897 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 01:00:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070100.m9710aDT004199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-06 21:00:35 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 464429 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 01:07:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070107.m971732M006046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 --- Comment #3 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-06 21:07:02 EDT --- Ok, so I missed this one and made my own: Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/Judy/Judy-1.0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Some differences I note: - I named mine "Judy" not "judy". This matches the upstream tarball name and hence doesn't require %setup -n Judy-%{version}. I believe this is desirable according to the Naming Guidelines: "General Naming When naming a package, the name should match the upstream tarball or project name from which this software came. In some cases, this naming choice may be more complicated. If this package has been packaged by other distributions/packagers in the past, then you should try to match their name for consistency. In any case, try to use your best judgement, and other developers will help in the final decision." - "%configure --disable-static" to prevent building static libraries altogether--better than just deleting them afterwards. - I packaged the HTML versions of the docs. Would you consider my changes and like to co-maintain this package once it gets in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 01:20:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 21:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070120.m971KuoW008957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cra at wpi.edu --- Comment #4 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-06 21:20:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/miredo/miredo.spec SRPM URL: http://cra.fedorapeople.org/miredo/miredo-1.1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm I missed this Review Request and made my own packages above. Some differences: - I have created SysVInitScript files for the three daemons miredo, miredo-server, and isatapd. - Compiles with Judy. See Bug #464429 for a review request for that. - Disabled static libraries from building. - --enable-miredo-user allows the daemons to setid to the non-root user after initialization. I also add the user in %pre. Would you consider the above changes and co-maintainership? Splitting off miredo-server may make sense. I'll look into that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 02:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070246.m972k7vS026614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-06 22:46:00 EDT --- Will review now. coming ... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 02:57:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461388] Review Request: perl-Mouse - Moose minus the antlers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070257.m972vdQV028790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461388 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-06 22:57:38 EDT --- Imported and built in devel. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 04:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070404.m9744VjX006729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-07 00:04:30 EDT --- APPROVED Suggestions: 1. Fix space and tab mix 2. Include CHANGES also NA = Not applicable, ! = requires attention, x = passed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865791 [rpmbuild at rocky SRPMS]$ rpmlint nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-4.fc9.src.rpm nagios-plugins-check_sip.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 57, tab: line 3) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please correct this [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rpmlint -i nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-4.fc9.i386.rpm nagios-plugins-check_sip.i386: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. Fine nagios-plugins-check_sip.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. Fine 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Required: [x] package name [x] package base name and spec name [x] packaging guidelines [x] license file included [x] license correct [x] spec legible & in American english [x] md5sum checked source okay [x] package compiled on all primary architectures [x] Buildrequires tag - okay [NA] locale [NA] desktop file - GUI [x] owns all directories it creates [x] permissions in %defattr correct [x] %clean and %install section have 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' [x] %doc files don't have any dependency on other section of package [x] valid encoding Optional: [x] description and summary fine [NA] license file query [x] package functioning - okay [x] any scripts [x] no dependencies outside FHS guideline paths [!] you may like to include CHANGES file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 04:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465830] Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070426.m974Qt6J010625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465830 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-07 00:26:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865871 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 7b0cd5e64e96680f42fe486ea7b8f9ce mk_MK.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 04:26:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:26:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465831] Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070426.m974QeAG010574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465831 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-07 00:26:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865869 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. a809a8a6202a5ef36742bbb1bd756de1 tl_PH.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 04:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070434.m974YPt3011432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 00:34:24 EDT --- Hello, thank you for your comments. (In reply to comment #2) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files > Could you BuildRequire gettext and use the %find_lang macro as depicted in the > Guidelines? Will this cause a problem? - For this package "BR: gettext" is not needed because gettext .mo files are already shipped in gem. Also %find_lang is actually used (for symlinked mo files under %_datadir/locale) as: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- %find_lang rails %find_lang rgettext %{__cat} *.lang >> %{name}.lang %files -n ruby-gettext-package -f %{name}.lang --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The problem is that %find_lang cannot handle files under %gemdir > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * The package does not use the macro's consistently. e.g. the lines > %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}%{gemdir}/bin/ > ... > rm -rf %{buildroot} > cause some inconsistency. > Also you use the "%{__command}" notation for some commands and "command" > notation for the others. One example: "mv" should be "%{__mv}" if you want to > be consistent. - Will fix them > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby : > The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems > You only have > BuildRequires: ruby(rubygems) > Requires: ruby(rubygems) - ruby(rubygems) pulls rubygems. And using virtual Provides for (Build)Requires is preferred (as well as perl) if possible. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * Requires: ruby(rubygems) > Requires: irb > Don't you need to require a specific version (or above)? (just asking) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- - This package already has "(Build)Requires: ruby(abi) = %rubyabi". > * If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and as a straight > Ruby library without Gem support, it must be packaged as a Gem first. To make > it available to code that does not use Ruby Gems, a subpackage called > ruby-%{gemname} must be created in the rubygem-%{gemname} package such that > > But your straight library is named ruby-%{gemname}-package. Can you explain > why? - Because * non-gem version is actually called as ruby-gettext-package (on the upstream URL) * Also there is already a rpm named "ruby-gettext-package" in Fedora (which I currently maintain). This new rpm is to supersede current ruby-gettext-package after switching source from native tarball to gem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 06:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 02:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070602.m9762m5n025730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #4 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-07 02:02:47 EDT --- You're welcome. So everything seems fine but I am a little concerned about the locale files: (In reply to comment #3) > Hello, thank you for your comments. > > (In reply to comment #2) > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the > > %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files > > Could you BuildRequire gettext and use the %find_lang macro as depicted in the > > Guidelines? Will this cause a problem? > > - For this package "BR: gettext" is not needed because gettext .mo files > are already shipped in gem. But the .mo files are binary. I think you need to remove them and rebuild them from the .po files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:10:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070710.m977Au1O004426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-07 03:10:55 EDT --- Thanks! Added CHANGES and fixed small issue with tab/space mix New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nagios-plugins-check_sip Short A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:27:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070727.m977R5F5007961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 03:27:04 EDT --- Hello. (In reply to comment #4) > But the .mo files are binary. I think you need to remove them and rebuild them > from the .po files. Okay. This time I recreated gettext .mo files. Note that this package still does not have "BuildRequires: gettext". As the name of this package shows this package should provide the ruby inplementation of gettext and if msgfmt or so is needed this package should do it by itself. Actually this package uses calls ruby "iconv" method, which calls C gettext related functions. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext-1.93.0-4.tmp.src.rpm * Tue Oct 7 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.93.0-4 - Recreate gettext .mo files (by using this itself) Koji build: F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865979 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865981 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:27:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] New: Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Summary: Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dchen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm.spec SRPM URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm-1.1-0.fc9.src.rpm Description: FbTerm is a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device. Features include: - mostly as fast as terminal of linux kernel while accelerated scrolling is enabled on framebuffer device - select font with fontconfig and draw text with freetype2, same as Qt/Gtk+ based GUI apps - dynamicly create/destroy up to 10 windows initially running default shell - record scrollback history for every window - auto-detect text encoding with current locale, support double width scripts like Chinese, Japanese etc - switch between configurable additional text encodings with hot keys on the fly - copy/past selected text between windows with mouse when gpm server is running -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465830] Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070734.m977YhmY009072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465830 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-07 03:34:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mk Short Description: Macedonian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:35:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465831] Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070735.m977ZUoG009478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465831 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-07 03:35:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-tl Short Description: Tagalog hunspell dictionary Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:36:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070736.m977apj9009718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 03:36:50 EDT --- 3 bytes modified... http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-gettext/rubygem-gettext-1.93.0-5.tmp.src.rpm * Tue Oct 7 2008 Mamoru Tasaka - 1.93.0-5 - Recreate gettext .mo files (by using this itself) Koji build: F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865994 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=865995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 07:58:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070758.m977wBGd014306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #39 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-07 03:58:09 EDT --- Is it possible to add /usr/libexec/gromacs-4.0 directory to PATH somehow by rpm? For example by adding /etc/profile.d/gromacs4.sh file: export PATH=$PATH:/usr/libexec/gromacs-4.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 08:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 04:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070820.m978KaCC021148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-07 04:20:35 EDT --- Renamed module files. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3-3.3.3-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 08:19:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 04:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070819.m978JJMB020432@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #40 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-07 04:19:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Is it possible to add /usr/libexec/gromacs-4.0 directory to PATH somehow by > rpm? > > For example by adding /etc/profile.d/gromacs4.sh file: > > export PATH=$PATH:/usr/libexec/gromacs-4.0 I see you aren't familiar with the module system. (BTW, I'm a bit surprised how long it's taken for it to be used in Fedora since it's been standard on HPCs for years..) Type: $ module load gromacs-4.0 and the paths are automatically added. (PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, MANPATH, GMXLIB and so on.) Then you can run GROMACS as normal. In fact, I'll rename the module as gromacs, which is a better choice: when 4.1 comes out the users wouldn't have to bother about changing their scripts. The module for GROMACS 3.x series is then gromacs3. Updated spec & srpm: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.13.rc3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 08:25:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 04:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070825.m978PjFW022055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #15 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-07 04:25:44 EDT --- Use following in the spec file: Release: 1%{?dist} This will make tags for F8 and F9 branch different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 08:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 04:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070827.m978RPvB022664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #16 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-07 04:27:24 EDT --- Just as a note - devel branch (or better said any higher branch of Fedora - should have the same or higher release number to prevent misinterpreted updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 08:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 04:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070836.m978aAEh024563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #41 from Jouni V?liaho 2008-10-07 04:36:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #39) > I see you aren't familiar with the module system. (BTW, I'm a bit surprised how > long it's taken for it to be used in Fedora since it's been standard on HPCs > for years..) > > Type: > > $ module load gromacs-4.0 > Yes, I was not aware of the module system. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:47:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070947.m979lEe6011780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:47:13 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:47:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463400] Review Request: xmmsctrl - command line control utility for xmms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070947.m979lc6P011975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463400 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:47:37 EDT --- xmmsctrl-1.8-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070947.m979lOgo011867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:47:23 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ksplice'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8647 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:46:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070946.m979kxbO011692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:46:57 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ksplice'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463400] Review Request: xmmsctrl - command line control utility for xmms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070950.m979ocMP012760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463400 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:50:37 EDT --- xmmsctrl-1.8-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:49:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070949.m979nKDN011945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:49:19 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.10.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070954.m979sAmO014182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:54:08 EDT --- R2spec-2.5.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:51:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070951.m979p1Va013359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:51:00 EDT --- libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:53:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070953.m979r1KU013833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:53:00 EDT --- libmicrohttpd-0.3.1-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:53:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070953.m979rgdE014015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457924] Review Request: libmicrohttpd - Lightweight library for embedding a webserver in applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070951.m979pMu3013422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457924 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070951.m979pYRW013517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:51:32 EDT --- ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ume-launcher'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8673 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 09:53:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 05:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458685] Review Request: R2spec - Python script to generate R spec file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810070953.m979rcCa013937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458685 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 05:53:35 EDT --- R2spec-2.5.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071000.m97A0bVP015972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-07 06:00:36 EDT --- Thanks for your review, Mamoru Line 234 above (openca-prefix) is OK, since it is unused (presumably reminiscent from a larger project, openca, from which ocspd is derived). I have uploaded a new version: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-rc1.3.fc8.src.rpm _ %files have been reworked according to your suggestion (thanks for it :-). _ autoheader called in spec file, effectively removing the warning you mention _ configure file patched to unambiguously remove option "--disable-shared" and option removed from spec file. _ User creation reworked according to the new directives _ .fc8 removed from comment Successful mock fedora-devel-i386 rpmlint binary RPM says: ocspd.i386: W: non-standard-uid /etc/ocspd/private ocspd ocspd.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/ocspd/private 0700 ocspd.i386: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ocspd ocspd} Same explanation as for 1.5.1-0.1.rc1 for the 2 firsts. Subsys OK (ocspd) after shell processing: the last rpmlint report is a misunderstanding of the shell script by rpmlint. rpmlint spec, source and debuginfo reports none. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465943] New: Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Summary: Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwmw2 at infradead.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect-0.94-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains software for integrating the openconnect VPN software with NetworkManager and the GNOME desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071018.m97AIwfB020078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 06:18:57 EDT --- Lots of issues I mentioned I mentioned in my comment 6 are again re-introduced. Please fix them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071025.m97AP6tk022030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 06:25:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Lots of issues I mentioned I mentioned in my comment 6 are again re-introduced. > Please fix them again. s/I mentioned I mentioned/I mentioned/' :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] New: Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Text-SpellChecker/perl-Text-SpellChecker.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Text-SpellChecker/perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module is built on Text::Aspell, but adds some of the functionality provided by the internal gnu aspell API. This allows one to deal with blocks of text, rather than just words. For instance, we provide methods for iterating through the text, serializing the object (thus remembering where we left off), and highlighting the current misspelled word within the text. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:41:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071041.m97AfVG9026438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |Linux-certs at dell.com --- Comment #1 from srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com 2008-10-07 06:41:29 EDT --- Initial Review: rpmlint o/p: [root at localhost redhat]# rpmlint SRPMS/wsmancli-2.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm [root at localhost redhat]# rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/wsmancli-* naming: ok spec file name matches: ok license = BSD: ok license tag: ok spec in english: ok spec legible: ok complies on i386 and x86_64: ok all BRs correct: ok spec doesn't use locales: ok properly uses ldconfig in scriptlets: ok not relocatable: ok dir ownership: ok no duplicate files: ok file perms correct: ok %clean section: ok consistent use of macros: ok code, not content: ok no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok %doc usage ok headers in -devel: ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok .so in -devel: ok all libtool .la files removed: ok no GUI, no .desktop files: ok dir ownership correct: ok %install does rm: ok filenames UTF8: ok Thanks Srinivas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:45:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071045.m97AjLiG026927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-07 06:45:20 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 5ff88f9bc19dfd7e52c5ef18fe56048b2bf4ffc4 Text-SpellChecker-0.03.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested , but it's a standard perl module and should work anywhere [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:52:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071052.m97AqScW028405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-07 06:52:27 EDT --- version 2 for both -tools and -linux is out now. Once you have updated them to the 2.0 final release I can do a review. Is there a reason the two packages are combined? I also noticed you add a user as part of the install but dont remove it on uninstall, not sure what the standard for that is though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 10:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 06:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071056.m97Aut10029254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-07 06:56:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-SpellChecker Short Description: OO interface for spell-checking a block of text Owners: pghmcfc Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the rapid review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 12:19:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071219.m97CJll2016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2008-10-07 08:19:46 EDT --- Okay, I'll wait with the full review until a agreement has been reached about these two versions of this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 12:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071221.m97CLrOE016716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-07 08:21:51 EDT --- The "new" elisa sub-packages can't go into Fedora until they get reviewed and approved... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 12:32:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 08:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071232.m97CWOa1018886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-07 08:32:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: primer3 Short Description: PCR primer design tool Owners: pingou Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 13:05:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071305.m97D50L0026120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 09:04:59 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 13:08:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071308.m97D8DRv027010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 09:08:12 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 13:15:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071315.m97DFTbr028731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-07 09:15:27 EDT --- ping ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 13:17:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 09:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071317.m97DHSYF029154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #14 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-07 09:17:27 EDT --- Apologizes. I restarted from an old version :-( Please find the new one: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-0.2.rc1.fc8.src.rpm Old versions have been removed from the server (thus orphaning previous links!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:19:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071419.m97EJXXQ012602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-07 10:19:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: screenruler Short Description: GNOME screen ruler Owners: deji Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071428.m97ESgwe015205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071450.m97EoLeF020615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #42 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-07 10:50:19 EDT --- Putting end user executables under /usr/libexec seems to be in contradiction of what libexec is for. Certainly this kind of thing should at least be discussed by the packaging committee before it is done in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:51:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071451.m97EpY3W020867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-07 10:51:32 EDT --- TrueCrypt upstream is no longer communicating on this issue. I'm closing this ticket out as CANTFIX, and adding it to ForbiddenItems: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems#TrueCrypt If TrueCrypt were to make major changes to their licensing, then we might be able to reconsider this, however, given the tone in our communications, I do not feel this is likely to occur. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071456.m97Eugj6021901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464429 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:56:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071456.m97EuhcV021932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |437626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 14:57:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071457.m97EvADT022006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-07 10:57:09 EDT --- * The original elisa-common split was fine, IMO. No need to duplicate files. And no need to add a virtual elisa-devel. We have tools in non-devel packages that are BuildRequires. elisa-common can be BR, too. * The %description could explain briefly what "good set of plugins" means and why it matters. * 0.5.13 is available. Packaging-wise this is fine. Could be imported and developed further in cvs until the deps are ready, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:05:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246368] Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071505.m97F55j0023625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246368 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-07 11:05:04 EDT --- So, it's been more than a few days. Was there ever any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071504.m97F4Yc4023502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #3 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-07 11:04:33 EDT --- koji test build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=866710 rpmlint says: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:03:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:03:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071503.m97F3WS6023349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-07 11:03:30 EDT --- * pigment-python >= 0.3.8 is needed by elisa-plugins-bad-0.5.12-1.fc9.noarch So, reviewing needs rawhide. (F9: pigment-python-0.3.3-1.fc9.i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:10:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071510.m97FAYrE025109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-07 11:10:33 EDT --- The second URL seems to be invalid. It doesn't seem as if the updated spec and package were uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459218] Review Request: python-morph - Image Morphology Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071513.m97FDQGK025692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459218 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(kushaldas at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-07 11:13:25 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071521.m97FLKmR027325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-07 11:21:19 EDT --- Oh great! I forgot to upload them. Now it should work, sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:29:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071529.m97FTXQP029255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #1 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-07 11:29:32 EDT --- koji test build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=866770 rpmlint says this, which it also says of the other NetworkManager-foo packages: NetworkManager-openconnect.ppc: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-openconnect-service.conf NetworkManager-openconnect.ppc: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/NetworkManager/VPN/nm-openconnect-service.name 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:32:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071532.m97FWivX030200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #43 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-07 11:32:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > Putting end user executables under /usr/libexec seems to be in contradiction of > what libexec is for. Certainly this kind of thing should at least be discussed > by the packaging committee before it is done in Fedora. Then where should they be placed..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 15:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226656] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071534.m97FY8bs030381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226656 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Adam Jackson 2008-10-07 11:34:07 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:13:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:13:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071613.m97GD4Du005137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-07 12:13:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint on binary package: > > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL-FAQ.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/doc/69oldstandard-fonts-1/OFL.txt > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Old Standard is an > attempt to provide a high quality font, suitable for classical, biblical and > medieval studies as well as for general-purpose typesetting in languages which > use Greek or Cyrillic script, > 69oldstandard-fonts.noarch: E: no-changelogname-tag > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > > (In reply to comment #2) > > The spec file and package name differ. Shouldn't the package be named > > 69oldstandard as you also originally submitted? > > Rather I guess you intended to rename it to oldstandard-fonts. updated the packages.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:19:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071619.m97GJP2J006569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Valent Turkovic 2008-10-07 12:19:23 EDT --- when ever this comes in rawhide I volunteering to test it and provide feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:25:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071625.m97GP8l7008281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #4 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-07 12:25:06 EDT --- Few questions from fedora-devel that should be answered - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00273.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071643.m97GhtTv012877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-07 12:43:54 EDT --- * Licence has changed: cssutils is published under the LGPL 3 or later (from 0.9.5b3, before it was the LGPL 2.1) * rpmlint reports wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding for %doc files * The /usr/bin/css* executables "Requires: python-setuptools" or else they traceback! * Group "Applications/Multimedia"? Rather Development/Libraries, but the groups are too limited. * The generated html documentation for the API could be put into a separate -docs package. Rest looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462074] Review Request: gnome-applet-jalali-calendar - Jalali calendar panel applet for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071652.m97GqkD1014945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462074 Bug 462074 depends on bug 463054, which changed state. Bug 463054 Summary: libbonobo.x86_64 should own %_prefix/lib/bonobo{,servers} https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463054 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071653.m97GrWkO015022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Resolution|DUPLICATE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:54:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071654.m97GsZAF016858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-07 12:54:32 EDT --- *** Bug 464429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464429] Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071654.m97GsYtM016832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-07 12:54:32 EDT --- @Charles, OK, you may going forward with you package and I will close this review request. Of corse, I am ready to co-maintain your package aver the review may be finished. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 465897 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 16:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 12:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071654.m97Gsa38016896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Bug 437626 depends on bug 464429, which changed state. Bug 464429 Summary: Review Request: judy - C Library for Dynamic Sparse Arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464429 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071701.m97H183i016932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-07 13:01:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > spec file > > URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec > > > > SRPM URL: > > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm > > > > Description : A fun font from the Crude Factory. > > I am a new Packager and I am looking for a Sponsor. > > spec file > URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts.spec > > SRPM URL: > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm rebuilt after correcting errors.. spec file URL:http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/69bonvenocf-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:20:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071720.m97HKmbJ023101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:20:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071722.m97HM1CW023393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:22:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071730.m97HUP0f023620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:30:24 EDT --- Note that all packages will get a F-10 branch when we mass branch for it. You can request one now if you need one to land lots of changes in the rawhide branch for after F-10 release. Do you need a F-10 early branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:28:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226656] Merge Review: xorg-x11-xtrans-devel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071728.m97HSOEx024517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226656 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:28:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:34:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071734.m97HYeS9025764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:34:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:39:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071739.m97HdiNt025500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:39:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:37:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071737.m97HbE9V024946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:37:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:39:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:39:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071739.m97HddTR025452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |apevec at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-07 13:39:38 EDT --- Where is spins-kickstart RPM? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc//rpms/spins-kickstart/ gives 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:41:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071741.m97HfNO9027890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:41:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:43:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071743.m97HhTk7026743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 --- Comment #6 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-07 13:43:28 EDT --- Got it, it's http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/spin-kickstarts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465831] Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071744.m97HiIbk026888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465831 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:44:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465830] Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071742.m97HgJT6026561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465830 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:42:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071745.m97HjTG7028901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:45:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071746.m97HkihU027719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:46:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071747.m97HlsTY027911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:47:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 17:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 13:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447533] Review Request: minirpc - an RPC library for stream oriented transports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071749.m97HnQbM029563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447533 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-07 13:49:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071804.m97I4Y9h032122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 14:04:32 EDT --- I just tried to rebuild this but rebuild fails on x86_64 (at least): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=864317 By the way the binary name "insight" may be too generic and some other reviewers may complain... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:11:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071811.m97IBJZA001610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 14:11:18 EDT --- At least please fix %optflags issue (By the way you can simply remove "export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" line. In rpmbuild $RPM_OPT_FLAGS is already set and is the same as %optflags). Then I will re-check your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:13:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071813.m97IDfwR001954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-07 14:13:39 EDT --- I can't build, make build ends with: 867022 build (dist-f10, devel:perl-qooxdoo-compat-0_7_3-2_fc10): open (x86-3.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: BuildError: package perl-qooxdoo-compat not in list for tag dist-f10 If I try: (setting f11 by hand) /usr/bin/koji build dist-f11 'cvs://cvs.fedoraproject.org/cvs/pkgs?rpms/perl-qooxdoo-compat/devel#perl-qooxdoo-compat-0_7_3-2_fc10 I get: 867037 build (dist-f11, devel:perl-qooxdoo-compat-0_7_3-2_fc10): open (x86-7.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> FAILED: GenericError: Unable to complete build: release mismatch (build: 2.fc10, rpm: 2.fc11) Can't pacakges be imported when we are in some kind of freeze or is this a bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:20:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071820.m97IKfht005087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-07 14:20:40 EDT --- Imported and built. LICENSE added to %doc per reviewer's suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071824.m97IO6ZY004485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-07 14:24:05 EDT --- Thanks. This looks good to me; rpmlint is silent and the small test suite passes. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:25:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465727] Review Request: obexd - D-Bus service for Obex Client access In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071825.m97IP7fG004909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465727 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-07 14:25:05 EDT --- Building in rawhide, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457108] Review Request: libss7 - SS7 protocol services to applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071833.m97IXRcR006737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457108 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 14:33:26 EDT --- libss7-1.0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libss7-1.0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071840.m97Ie3pf008256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-07 14:40:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > - Separate BuildRequires and Requires should be made for each required package. Hmh, how did I manage to state this so unclearly? I mean, of course, that the requires should be broken one per line, in alphabetized order. That way they're a lot easier to read and the spec file looks cleaner. When you modify the spec file, in addition to removing the RPM_OPT_FLAGS line please add also the revision argument to the svn command in the comment and correct the group. Thanks for packaging btw, I'll be one of the users when the rpm hits the repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 18:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 14:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] New: Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Summary: Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/teamgit/teamgit.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=867189&name=teamgit-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=867188 Description: This package provides a visual tool for Git, a distributed revision control system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071908.m97J8tnC014498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #18 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-07 15:08:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > > # The source for this package was pulled from upstream's vcs. Use the > > # following commands to generate the tarball: > > # svn co https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 > > # tar cvzf pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz pymol-1.1 > > Source0: pymol-1.1-20080912svn3419.tar.gz > > - More exactly: > svn co -r 3419 > https://pymol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pymol/branches/b11/pymol pymol-1.1 > Done. > > - Group: Development/Tools > > Wouln't Applications/Engineering be a better choice? This is a atomistic > visualisation program, after all. (Applications/Science would of course be > better if it existed..) > Changed to Applications/Engineering > - Separate BuildRequires and Requires should be made for each required package. > Done according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251#c17 > > - export RPM_OPT_FLAGS="-O2" > > Is there some reason not to use %optflags? > Fixed. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-5.20080912svn3419.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:07:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071907.m97J71ru015457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 15:07:00 EDT --- Okay, two more issues (and I think these are all if I am not missing any... I hope) * Obsoletes/Provides - For some reasons (mainly for upgrading path), this type of Obsoletes/Provides should be specified by full EVR (Epoch-Version-Release), like: --------------------------------------------------- Obsoletes: openca-ocspd <= %{version}-%{release} Provides: openca-ocspd = %{version}-%{release} --------------------------------------------------- ! By the way are these two Obsoletes/Provides really needed? * groupadd - Adding group "daemon" is not needed. "setup" rpm correctly adds this group. ! By the way it is usually preferable that this package (ocspd) creates its own group and use it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:14:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071914.m97JEuI3017394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:33:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464931] Review Request: appliance-os recipe for building the appliance operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071933.m97JXblG022537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464931 --- Comment #7 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-07 15:33:36 EDT --- Still, spin-kickstarts is empty, it's not imported and built yet, any ETA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:37:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071937.m97Jbpvx021860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 --- Comment #1 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-07 15:37:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319689) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319689) SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:36:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] New: sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Summary: sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: simon at schampijer.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Created an attachment (id=319688) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319688) SPEC URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:55:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:55:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460107] Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071955.m97JteQ9027071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 19:55:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460111] Review Request: perl-Data-ICal - Generates iCalendar (RFC 2445) calendar files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810071955.m97Jtffw027102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460111 Bug 460111 depends on bug 460107, which changed state. Bug 460107 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-vFile-asData - Parse vFile formatted files into data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460107 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 20:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072030.m97KUeOj001761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #8 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-07 16:30:39 EDT --- Oh, if you decide to remove the favicons completely that won't break anything. I think you should do it this way if you don't want to build them yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 20:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072028.m97KShfo003204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Alias| |rubygem-gettext Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-07 16:28:41 EDT --- Thanks for the update! * I have one suggestion. The two rpmlint errors: rubygem-gettext-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rubygem-gettext-doc-1.93.0/test/rails/public/favicon.ico rubygem-gettext-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rubygem-gettext-doc-1.93.0/samples/rails/public/favicon.ico These are favicons (the icon (image) that shows in your browser to the left of the addressbar when you go to a webpage). These are probably for the .html doc files. Having them at zero-length is most likely a mistake of upstream. I would let them know. You can also create a favicon from their logo yourself (with gimp or imagemagick or so) and replace with the in the package. I leave this up to you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- * One last thing I noticed. If I go to /usr/share/doc/rubygem-gettext-doc-1.93.0/samples/rails/public/ or /usr/share/doc/rubygem-gettext-doc-1.93.0/test/rails/public/ the index.html there has a broken link: "About your applications environment" points to some non-existing file:///usr/share/doc/rubygem-gettext-doc-1.93.0/{samples,test}/rails/public/rails/info/properties Did you forget to package something, or is this an upstream mistake again? -------------------------------------------------------------------------- But otherwise the package seems good. Check these issues and see if there's anything we can do. I'm now approving it. -------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-gettext) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 20:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072054.m97KsPOA006846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #2 from Dan Williams 2008-10-07 16:54:25 EDT --- rpmlint is wrong; that's where dbus stores service config files. Note that these should _NOT_ be marked %config either, they are not meant to be user-editable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:12:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072112.m97LCZjF011408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-07 17:12:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chktex Short Description:LaTex semantic checker Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:23:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072123.m97LNssu014116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Rene Ploetz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] New: Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Summary: Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: reneploetz at gmx.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mysqltcl is an extension to the Tool Command Language (Tcl) that provides high-level access to a MySQL database server. This is my first package, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:33:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072133.m97LXalY016064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-07 17:33:35 EDT --- First, Mamoru Tasaka, thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #2) > Some notes: > > * Macros > - Defining %_prefix is not needed Ok. > - jobs is not defined on Fedora. Also please support > parallel make if possible: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make Ok. > - %distname is not defined. %distname replaced by %{distribution} > * SourceURL > - must be written with full URL. For sourceforge hosted tarball, > please refer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Ok. > * BuildRoot > - does not honor Fedora packaging guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Set to %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > * Compilation flags > - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. > You can check what compilation flags are used by > $ rpm --eval %optflags > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > - Also compilation flag "-Os" supersedes "-O2" flag in %optflags so > please remove this. Excuse me, but I do ot completely understand you. I'm do ot provide manually any compilation flags, so, default must be used. > * Timestamps > - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep > timestamps on installed files. Ok. > * Desktop file > - When using only basename of the icon file is used for Icon entry > removing suffix is preferred: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files Ok, extension .png removed. > * %clean > - The part "[ -d %{buildroot} -a "%{buildroot}" != "" ] && " > is not needed Ok. > * Inconsistent usage of %buildroot vs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > - Please choose one and not use both Ok. > * %defattr > - We recommend to use %defattr(-,root,root,-) Ok. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/DivFix++/DivFix++-0.30-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:35:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465831] Review Request: hunspell-tl - Tagalog hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072135.m97LZfO4019366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465831 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465830] Review Request: hunspell-mk - Macedonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072134.m97LY8sH018879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465830 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072137.m97Lb3xS016876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-07 17:37:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Your spec generates an empty debuginfo rpm, which is a no-no (check 'BuildArch: noarch' added Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/remoot.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/remoot-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm Scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=816777 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:41:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] New: Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ber.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-ber-0.20080210-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Amazigh hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 21:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] New: Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-tk-0.20080213-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Turkmen hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 23:35:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 19:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072335.m97NZ5SL007443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 19:35:04 EDT --- perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 7 23:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 19:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810072335.m97NZwqr007723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-07 19:35:57 EDT --- perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 00:44:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459800] Review Request: python-py - Innovative python library containing py.test, greenlets and other niceties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080044.m980inPl023401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459800 --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-07 20:44:48 EDT --- Oops, that should be:: optparser = optparse.OptionParser(usage) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 00:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries Alias: perl-MooseX-Types https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-Types OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-MooseX-Types-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-MooseX-Types.spec Description: The types provided with the Moose manpage are by design global. This package helps you to organise and selectively import your own and the built-in types in libraries. As a nice side effect, it catches typos at compile-time too. However, the main reason for this module is to provide an easy way to not have conflicts with your type names, since the internal fully qualified names of the types will be prefixed with the library's name. This module will also provide you with some helper functions to make it easier to use Moose types in your code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 01:04:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080104.m98142k9031125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #30 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-07 21:04:00 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319715) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319715) un-extra-fonts.spec-5.patch Spec file - http://get9.net/rpm/5/un-extra-fonts.spec - add subpackages with a macro - add description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 01:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080130.m981UM52006101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #37 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-07 21:30:21 EDT --- Can I help with anything ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 03:06:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 23:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080306.m9836LwK032084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 23:06:20 EDT --- Thanks! - For zero length ico, for now I just keep these as they are. - About info/properties: This is related to "ruby on rails", however I am not familiar with it.. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gettext Short Description: RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: sseago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 03:07:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 23:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080307.m9837pr5031564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-07 23:07:51 EDT --- Ah... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gettext Short Description: RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby Owners: mtasaka sseago Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 05:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080537.m985bX35030884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-08 01:37:32 EDT --- nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 05:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080537.m985bUHk032320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-08 01:37:28 EDT --- nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 05:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080547.m985lNHB000866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 01:47:21 EDT --- Closing (as this is requested for only F-10). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 05:47:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080547.m985lOsX000896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Bug 465511 depends on bug 465382, which changed state. Bug 465382 Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - SMIME/CMS packages for Bouncy Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 05:49:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 01:49:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080549.m985nqP3002827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-08 01:49:51 EDT --- Oops, sorry for noise -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 06:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 02:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080632.m986WAfR011090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-08 02:32:09 EDT --- Imported and built: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=867555 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=867549 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=867547 EL-5: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/368-perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.el5/ EL-4: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-4-epel/367-perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.el4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 07:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080717.m987HXc0017166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o | |rg) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 03:17:32 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 07:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080718.m987IWmP017304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 03:18:30 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 07:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 03:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080718.m987IrXP019129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o | |rg) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 03:18:51 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 08:06:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 04:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080806.m9886kwp027498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #27 from Jochen Roth 2008-10-08 04:06:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Note that all packages will get a F-10 branch when we mass branch for it. > You can request one now if you need one to land lots of changes in the rawhide > branch for after F-10 release. > > Do you need a F-10 early branch? Yes, thanks I noticed that but I thought that I have to create an extra request for new packages. In this case I don't need an extra F-10 early branch. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 08:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 04:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080826.m988Qk7q031949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #2 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-08 04:26:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers-2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm - Just a newer release. - rpmlint initial tests pass: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080918.m989IaCc009509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-08 05:18:35 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080919.m989JEBo010880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:24:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080924.m989OIbQ010939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:23:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080923.m989NcBN012130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-08 05:23:37 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080938.m989cIx0013799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o | |rg) | --- Comment #9 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-08 05:38:17 EDT --- we just had some discussion with jna, libffi and gstreamer-java packager and upstream developer to be able to package gstreamer-java-1.0 which is working and run on fedora 9,10,11 and rhel-5 too (most problem was generated by this review reqest:-). if all these issue will be solved (probably after a newer jna and gstreamer-java release) i'll submit this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:46:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080946.m989k8ku016706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #44 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-08 05:46:06 EDT --- Got an OK to use %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{version} from the Packaging committee. Also, modified the package to load the module automatically. gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs4 gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modulefiles/gromacs gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gromacs.csh gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gromacs.sh gromacs-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 15 warnings. Please review. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.14.rc3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 09:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 05:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810080950.m989oM4D016732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #16 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-08 05:50:21 EDT --- Obsoletes/Provides is required in case someone installed the openca-ocspd package provided by upstream on sourceforge.net (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=20873&package_id=25740). Version 1.5.1-0.3.rc1: _ Obsoletes/Provides completed. _ Group 'daemon' replaced by 'ocspd'. http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/ocspd-1.5.1-0.3.rc1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 10:03:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081003.m98A3TXx020051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Bug 438608 depends on bug 457196, which changed state. Bug 457196 Summary: Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 10:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457196] Review Request: pymetar - METAR weather reports parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081003.m98A3SNP020014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457196 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-08 06:03:27 EDT --- Rebuilt the the packages a while back, but forgot to close this review. Doing so now. I've now updated to 0.14 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 10:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081032.m98AW8WV026196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-08 06:32:07 EDT --- Hi Denis, Any chance to retest this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 10:45:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 06:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081045.m98AjuQd028205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-08 06:45:55 EDT --- Added conflict to module file. gromacs3.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs3 gromacs3-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modulefiles/gromacs3 gromacs3-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs3-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs3-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-mpi-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs3-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs3-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs3-3.3.3-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 11:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465740] Review Request: rubygem-gettext - RubyGem of Localization Library and Tools for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081126.m98BQpIx003985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465740 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 07:26:50 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submitted push requests on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 11:55:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:55:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081155.m98Bt51h009872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Walsh 2008-10-08 07:55:04 EDT --- If you chcon -t vpnc_exec_t openconnect, does the connection work without any avc messages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 11:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 07:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081156.m98BuM9S010217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-08 07:56:21 EDT --- This test should be ignored in the meantime, please review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081202.m98C2tOo012441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:05:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081205.m98C5cpB013228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 Jima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jima at beer.tclug.o | |rg) | --- Comment #13 from Jima 2008-10-08 08:05:36 EDT --- Nah, thanks for the noise. I need to deal with this. I've bumped this package up to 1.02, released January of this year. (Wow.) Obviously, I also included your fix, which kills one of the rpmlint errors. Spec URL: http://beer.tclug.org/jima/fedora/nagios-plugins-rsync/nagios-plugins-rsync.spec SRPM URL: http://beer.tclug.org/jima/fedora/nagios-plugins-rsync/nagios-plugins-rsync-1.02-0.1.fc9.src.rpm This brings rpmlint's output down to: nagios-plugins-rsync.x86_64: W: no-documentation nagios-plugins-rsync.x86_64: E: no-binary nagios-plugins-rsync.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib (ditto on i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081223.m98CNo4W016754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #10 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-08 08:23:49 EDT --- so about your requires. it's a good question. if you use such functions from gstreamer-java which requires gstreamer-plugins-base then gstreamer-plugins-base should have to be at least 0.10.19. so your "Conflicts: gstreamer-plugins-base < 0.10.19" may be better, but i don't know if i not add requires for gstreamer-plugins-base < 0.10.19 the one can install gstreamer-java which is not working in some case which is the reason for requires in spec file.... $(build-classpath swt) working on fedora, but not on rhel/centos-5 that's why i use this way, but now i modify a bit. unfortunately until we've newer jna it can't build:-( http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SPECS/gstreamer-java.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SRPMS/gstreamer-java-1.0-0.2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:22:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081222.m98CMsWW017094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #5 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-08 08:22:53 EDT --- Yes, it works fine then. Thanks. I think it gives me a bunch of permissions I don't need, but certainly works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:39:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081239.m98CdcOJ020399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-08 08:39:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer-java Short Description: Java interface to the gstreamer framework Owners: lfarkas Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081237.m98CbTKi020195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o |fedora-cvs? |rg) | --- Comment #13 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-08 08:37:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rxtx Short Description: Serial and Parallel communication for Java Owners: lfarkas Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 12:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 08:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081253.m98Crbfk022868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #8 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-10-08 08:53:36 EDT --- ping again. I really want to get this in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081304.m98D4ki9026317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 09:04:45 EDT --- Please wait for my recheck. I have not approved this package yet. (Note: as I have to check 5 requests before this ticket so it may take a little long...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:10:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433398] Review Request: synbak - Synbak Universal Backup System (first package, need sponsor) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081310.m98DAOuc026978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433398 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 09:10:22 EDT --- Update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457917] Review Request: stress - tool to impose stress on a POSIX-compliant operating system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081310.m98DAZ85027039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457917 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 09:10:33 EDT --- Update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:11:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081311.m98DB7T2027890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 09:11:06 EDT --- Update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:29:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081329.m98DTSvv032403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 09:29:27 EDT --- I'm willing to do this review. Post updated versions addressing Fabian's comments in #1, and I'll assign to myself and complete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081335.m98DZoVC000687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 09:35:47 EDT --- Okay, once reverting to fedora-review?. If you are ready please let me again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081338.m98DcdwX001060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 09:38:37 EDT --- Almost okay. * CFLAGS * Gconf schemas install -- Actually the reason this build didn't honor Fedora cflags is because of configure(.in) From configure.in: ----------------------------------------------------------- 119 if test "x$GCC" = "xyes"; then 120 CFLAGS="-Wall -Werror -g " 121 fi ----------------------------------------------------------- The line 120 is completely unneeded (the corresponding line on configure is around the lines 16745) For this package just modifying configure is sufficient. - build.log shows: ----------------------------------------------------------- 560 if test -z "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gnomint-0.5.4-1.fc10.i386" ; then \ 561 for p in gnomint.schemas ; do \ 562 GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=xml:merged:/etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults gconftool-2 --makefile-install-rule $p; \ 563 done \ 564 fi ----------------------------------------------------------- Calling gconf-2 during rpmbuild is not preferred (see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf ) Fortunately configure accepts --disable-schemas-install, which prevents gconf-2 call. So changing %build stage as below will solve these two issues: ----------------------------------------------------------- %build sed -i -e 's|CFLAGS="-Wall -Werror -g "|true|' configure %configure --disable-schemas-install make %{?_smp_mflags} ----------------------------------------------------------- * Scriptlets - For safety close the lines with || : even for update-desktop-database: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database Other things are okay. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (gnomint) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- As I wrote on another review request: Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". I am already sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081336.m98Dau6T002014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 13:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 09:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081343.m98Dh3BV003418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #49 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-08 09:43:01 EDT --- Another thing :) I found out that last update change location of settings and history from ~/.kde/share/apps into ~/.sim. That's upstream change or you did it only in Fedora? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 14:09:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081409.m98E9FB1007844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #10 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-08 10:09:14 EDT --- Michel : If you're snowed under, I don't mind taking this one over for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 14:08:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081408.m98E8Sw6008552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk --- Comment #9 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-08 10:08:27 EDT --- I'll have a look-see at it tonight. I have some spare time ;-) I not checked, but as a quicky, are all occurences of $(prefix)/lib removed from the configure and makefiles as well as the .pc one? It won't pass if there are any of them in there. This is NOT optional, they have to be removed. Make sure that if it's installing files into the gac that the command line for this also has it being installed into %{_libdir} and not $prefix/lib. Again, this will fail it under 64 bit systems. Also check that you're using the exclusivearch which is used in the likes of the mono, monodevelop and other such packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 14:52:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:52:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081452.m98Eqo4g019292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 10:52:47 EDT --- Well, * For compilation flags, removing -ffastmath, -fomit-frame-pointer and so on can be done (for this package) by: -------------------------------------------------------------------- %build sed -i -e '/fomit-frame-pointer/d' configure sed -i -e '/ffast-math/d' configure %configure --enable-gpl --disable-sox --------------------------------------------------------------------- * For preventing binaries from being stripped, changing "install -c -s" to "install -c" (in Makefile's in this tarball) will fix it * For execstack issue, accoding to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Executable_stack the following will fix this issue: --------------------------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: prelink .... execstack -c $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/libmltgtk2.so ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * About binaries' names - This package installs some files under %_bindir, some of them have too generic names (like miracle): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace Would you rename binaries' names such as mlt-miracle, for example? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 15:12:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081512.m98FC30B023052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #45 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-08 11:12:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > Got an OK to use %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{version} from the Packaging > committee. Also, modified the package to load the module automatically. I read the discussion in fedora-packaging, but I haven't seen any conclusion yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 15:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081528.m98FSkmL028034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 11:28:44 EDT --- Okay. One minor issue - tkinter has "Requires: python" so "Requires: python" can be removed from this package (Requires: tkinter is still needed) Now: * This package itself is good * You have another review request (bug 462251), which I think is almost good ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (python-pmw) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". I am already sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 15:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081551.m98FpgxM011550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #50 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-08 11:51:41 EDT --- I guess that it is the consequence using bcond_with instead of bcond_without which means that kde support is not compiled in. Hopefully next build will revert to using kde. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 16:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081600.m98G0IUH015665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #46 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-08 12:00:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #44) > > Got an OK to use %{_libexecdir}/%{name}-%{version} from the Packaging > > committee. Also, modified the package to load the module automatically. > > I read the discussion in fedora-packaging, but I haven't seen any conclusion > yet. Whoops, seems like I spoke too soon. The initial comments were positive. Sorry. Anyway, I changed the locations of the binaries to libdir/gromacs-version/bin. gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs4 gromacs-common.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/modulefiles/gromacs gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gromacs.csh gromacs-common.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/profile.d/gromacs.sh gromacs-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs-csh.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support gromacs-zsh.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 15 warnings. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-0.15.rc3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 16:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081646.m98Gk9NV025414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 16:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081641.m98GftYH024450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #51 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-08 12:41:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > I guess that it is the consequence using bcond_with instead of bcond_without > which means that kde support is not compiled in. I thought it is true. In any case, I did not change any related setting. > Hopefully next build will revert to using kde. Shure. I build it now. It will be available shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 16:46:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 12:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081646.m98Gk0Xb025289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-08 12:45:58 EDT --- http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt-mirror/apt-mirror_0.4.5-1/apt-mirror.copyright is enough proof of licensing (GPLv2+), because the debian package maintainer is the same as upstream. You need to update the licensing tag to reflect this (currently, you have GPLv2, which is not correct). You should still email the author and ask him to include a proper license attribution in the header of the apt-mirror script, and a copy of the GPL (COPYING). Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 17:10:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081710.m98HAeLu030877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #16 from ?ge Olai Johnsen 2008-10-08 13:10:38 EDT --- The "strange" setting was done in a hurry. I've changed it to something closer to usefull: http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/rancid/rancid.spec http://files.thaumaturge.org/users/dante/rancid/rancid-2.3.2-0.6.a8.fc9.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 17:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081740.m98HeBXe005737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-08 13:40:10 EDT --- Patrice, I'm sure the package works correctly and there must be a fault in your configuration. Can you please try with the files from lxde-common (bug #442270) or base your configuration upon them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 17:42:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466147] New: Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 Summary: Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jochen at herr-schmitt.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fedora-ksplice is a collection of shell scripts to use ksplice in a Fedora environment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 17:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081749.m98HnEDv007051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-08 13:49:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/dahdi/dahdi.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/dahdi/dahdi-2.0.0-0.4.fc9.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > version 2 for both -tools and -linux is out now. Once you have updated them to > the 2.0 final release I can do a review. Is there a reason the two packages are > combined? To compile the -tools package you need some header files from the -linux package. Since the -linux package contains the kernel modules it can't be made available as a package for Fedora so I just included the tarball in the -tools package rather than extracting the individual header files. I just figured that it would be simpler to keep things in sync if I included the whole tarball. > I also noticed you add a user as part of the install but dont remove it on > uninstall, not sure what the standard for that is though. I'm pretty sure the standard is to not remove users because unless you scan the whole filesystem you don't know if there are any files owned by the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 18:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081816.m98IGoB6012284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 14:16:49 EDT --- Well, * SourceURL - seems 404. The correct one is perhaps: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/divfixpp/%{name}_v%{version}-src.tar.bz2 * Compilation flags (In reply to comment #3) > > * Compilation flags > > - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. > > You can check what compilation flags are used by > > $ rpm --eval %optflags > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > - Also compilation flag "-Os" supersedes "-O2" flag in %optflags so > > please remove this. > Excuse me, but I do ot completely understand you. I'm do ot provide manually > any compilation flags, so, default must be used. - So what I am saying is that you must modify cflags what is used on this tarball by default so that Fedora cflags are used correctly (i.e. you must use %optflags manually). Also this tarball uses "-Os" option, which should be removed. One of the solution is: -------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -n %{name}_v%{version} sed -i.flags -e 's|-Os||' makefile ...... ...... %build make %{?_smp_mflags} WXCONFIG=wx-config CPP="g++ %optflags" ------------------------------------------------------- * Desktop - Please set Category. Currently no Category is found (by the way --remove-category=Application can be removed if you don't use Application as Category from the beginning) * Macros > > - %distname is not defined. > %distname replaced by %{distribution} - My system does not define %distribution macro. Koji seems to define it, however its value (string) is "Unknown" so this is still wrong. Just use "--vendor=fedora". ! By the way if you put macros in braces please them consistently for cosmetic issue (i.e. use %{__install}) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 18:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081857.m98Ivmgf022370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 14:57:47 EDT --- Ok, I found a major problem right off. BuildRequires: grails = 1.0.3 Does not exist in Fedora. Is there a review request to add it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081904.m98J4QMZ023674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 --- Comment #2 from Luca Foppiano 2008-10-08 15:04:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Ok, I found a major problem right off. > > BuildRequires: grails = 1.0.3 > > Does not exist in Fedora. Is there a review request to add it? Damn! I forgot it!! ok, I'll submit asap a new request for grails. thanks Luca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 18:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081818.m98IIqss013582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081911.m98JBruj024508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 15:11:52 EDT --- If you like, post a link to that here, and I'll take a look at it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081919.m98JJMqs026987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 --- Comment #4 from Luca Foppiano 2008-10-08 15:19:21 EDT --- Thanks but I think I need to work a bit on that package, because IMHO is not ready to fedora... thanks Luca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081920.m98JKYVX027434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-08 15:20:32 EDT --- I uploaded a new version: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-2.fc8.src.rpm I tried to cross-mock it for fedora-devel-x86_64 on a i386, without success (missing basic dependencies at yum time). Perhaps there is a trick I did not find on the web/forums....? The new version fixes what seems to be the problem on x86_64... but I can't check it without the access to a 64bit machine and without knowing the above mentioned trick, if it exists. It also uses the system-installed "readline" and uses "expat". Mocks for i386. No rpmlint report. Runs on i386 fc8. For the binary name, the question is the same as for the package name (see comment #2). Cygwin developers know it as such, and Debian has kept it unchanged. I also fear CLI users will be puzzled by another name. If you really want to change it, do you have any naming proposals ? Thanks for your time -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081923.m98JNSqt028083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #11 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-08 15:23:27 EDT --- spec file autoreconf is not required. You've only altered the .pc file. Means that you can remove the BR for automake and autoconf. Please add in BR monodoc-devel. You should always build documentation if it's available. rpmlint comes out with it's usual errors about there being no binary in the main package, so I'd not worry there. Rebuild with monodoc enabled (remember, you also need this as a R as well) and I'm happy. I think it's Michel that has to approve it though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081922.m98JMbf1027885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 15:22:35 EDT --- Okay. * This package itself is now okay. * As written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored A person who wants to get sponsor is requested to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines", usually by submitting another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request. For your case you have another review request (bug 459631). The srpm in that bug does not build (on x86_64) currently, however the spec file itself seems good to some extent and I hope you will fix it properly (note: it may be that I don't have enough time to review bug 459631) ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (ocspd) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081937.m98Jbvqx031423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-08 15:37:56 EDT --- Feel free to email the f-devel list or myself if you'd like assistance getting it to that point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:42:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081942.m98JgKeJ032401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 --- Comment #10 from Dave Jones 2008-10-08 15:42:18 EDT --- looks great to me. Thanks Terje. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 19:45:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 15:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810081945.m98JjA1l000537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-08 15:45:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I uploaded a new version: > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-2.fc8.src.rpm > > I tried to cross-mock it for fedora-devel-x86_64 on a i386, without success > (missing basic dependencies at yum time). Perhaps there is a trick I did not > find on the web/forums....? You can't do that. You need an x86_64 machine. If you were already a Fedora packager, you could use koji --build file.src.rpm. > The new version fixes what seems to be the problem on x86_64... but I can't > check it without the access to a 64bit machine and without knowing the above > mentioned trick, if it exists. I'm sure the reviewer will check that. [...] > For the binary name, the question is the same as for the package name (see > comment #2). Cygwin developers know it as such, and Debian has kept it > unchanged. I also fear CLI users will be puzzled by another name. If you really > want to change it, do you have any naming proposals ? FWIW, I'm pretty sure the binary name is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 21:07:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082107.m98L7CkD015186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #12 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-10-08 17:07:10 EDT --- So the configure script can be simplified; the --disable-docs can be removed. The question then is: where do the documentations go? Since they are mostly developer-oriented, probably the -devel subpackage, and make it Provides: notify-sharp-doc. Or turn it entirely into its own subpackage (but this would leave the -devel subpackage containing only one file, as it does now -- a bit wasteful). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 21:33:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082133.m98LX12C023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-08 17:32:59 EDT --- package APPROVED. please do not forget to change the license tag to GPLv2+ before uploading to CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 21:58:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 17:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] New: Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Summary: Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emilyr at us.ibm.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb.spec SRPM URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb-1.3.2-1.src.rpm Description: Small Footprint CIM Broker (sfcb) is a CIM server conforming to the CIM Operations over HTTP protocol. It is robust, with low resource consumption and therefore specifically suited for embedded and resource constrained environments. sfcb supports providers written against the Common Manageability Programming Interface (CMPI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082214.m98MEmEC003334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #1 from Emily Ratliff 2008-10-08 18:14:47 EDT --- $ rpmlint sblim-sfcb.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint sblim-sfcb-1.3.2-1.src.rpm sblim-sfcb.src: W: non-standard-group System Tools 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint sblim*rpm sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcCertificateAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcFileRepository.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcProfileProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcCimXmlCodec.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcBasicPAMAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcClassProviderMem.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcClassProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcIndCIMXMLHandler.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcBasicAuthentication.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcBrokerCore.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcInteropServerProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcInteropProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcInternalProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcUtil.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcHttpAdapter.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcQualifierProvider.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libcimcClientSfcbLocal.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcObjectImplSwapI32toP32.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libsfcClassProviderGz.so sblim-sfcb.i386: W: non-standard-group System Tools sblim-sfcb.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/sfcb sblim-sfcb.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name sfcb sblim-sfcb-schema.i386: W: no-documentation sblim-sfcb-schema.i386: W: non-standard-group System Tools sblim-sfcb-schema.i386: W: invalid-license Distributed Management Task Force 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 25 warnings. I believe that the warnings about the libraries are all false positives because sfcb loads support libraries as needed. They are not development libraries. (19 warnings) I left the init script named sfcb rather than sblim-sfcb because that is what upstream does and that is what other community distros do. (2 warnings) My understanding is that the group name doesn't really matter. (2 warnings) The schema is copyright DMTF, see Release notes http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/cim_schema_v219/ReleaseNotes.html (1 warning) I left the schema package as a subpackage follow upstream's lead - advise on whether this is correct or not would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:29:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082229.m98MTl1x006328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #13 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-10-08 18:29:45 EDT --- The autoconf is needed because the source tarball is constructed from a svn checkout. Without it there won't be any configure. As for the monodoc compilation fails with the following errors: "Making all in docs make[1]: Entering directory `/home/foolish/rpmbuild/BUILD/notify-sharp-20080912/docs' /usr/bin/mdassembler --out notify-sharp-docs --ecma ./en /usr/bin/mdassembler --out notify-sharp-docs --ecma ./en Unhandled Exception: System.IO.IOException: Sharing violation on path /home/foolish/rpmbuild/BUILD/notify-sharp-20080912/docs/notify-sharp-docs.zip at System.IO.FileStream..ctor (System.String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize, Boolean anonymous, FileOptions options) [0x00000] at System.IO.FileStream..ctor (System.String path, FileMode mode, FileAccess access, FileShare share, Int32 bufferSize) [0x00000] at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) System.IO.FileStream:.ctor (string,System.IO.FileMode,System.IO.FileAccess,System.IO.FileShare,int) at System.IO.File.Create (System.String path, Int32 bufferSize, FileOptions options, System.Object fileSecurity) [0x00000] at System.IO.File.Create (System.String path) [0x00000] at Monodoc.HelpSource.SetupForOutput () [0x00000] at Monodoc.HelpSource..ctor (System.String base_filename, Boolean create) [0x00000] at Mono.Documentation.Assembler.Main (System.String[] args) [0x00000] make[1]: *** [notify-sharp-docs.tree] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Processing namespace Notifications Processing input file ActionArgs.xml Processing input file ActionHandler.xml Processing input file CloseArgs.xml Processing input file CloseHandler.xml Processing input file CloseReason.xml Processing input file Global.xml Processing input file Notification.xml Processing input file ServerInformation.xml Processing input file Urgency.xml Have 9 elements in the Notifications make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/foolish/rpmbuild/BUILD/notify-sharp-20080912/docs' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eQSVfb (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.eQSVfb (%build)" Any tips on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:33:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082233.m98MXEKM004501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Walsh 2008-10-08 18:33:13 EDT --- What is the path to openconnect? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082250.m98MoBwM008318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-08 18:50:09 EDT --- I tried, and it also doesn't work. That being said, I don't think that it should be a blocker, especially for devel. Do you want to work more on this, or have the package formally reviewed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246368] Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082247.m98MluM8007641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246368 --- Comment #4 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-10-08 18:47:55 EDT --- No update, sorry. Got buried in other work, after having limited success with pbbuttonsd, and I'd still like a solution that worked on intel hardware as well as the older G4 stuff. Not sure where that leaves this particular package. If it were already in Fedora officially, I'd keep maintaining it. But since I have limited interest in it as I'm on an intel macbook pro now, I'm reluctant to push for its acceptance at this point. If you know anyone interested in pushing it through anyway, let me know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 22:58:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 18:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082258.m98MwmWU015469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #9 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-08 18:58:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Okay. > > One minor issue > - tkinter has "Requires: python" so "Requires: python" can be removed from this > package > (Requires: tkinter is still needed) > Fixed. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/python-pmw-1.3.2-5.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082302.m98N2UgN011146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:01:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:01:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082301.m98N1sWA016476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-08 19:01:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pmw Short Description: python megawidgets Owners: timfenn Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:18:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082318.m98NIw3q019475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-08 19:18:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 --> see issue 1 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/remoot-0.9/README --> see issue 2 [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: Artistic 2.0 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 006430c9ee24d6645a10693c5a075c1722876e21 remoot-0.9.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. --> see issue 3 [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: koji scratch build [?] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ISSUES 1. two have slipped in the Requires: perl line. Please replace it with perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) 2. please use iconv (plus touch -r to preserve the timestamp) to fix this. it's cosmetic but too easy to not fix it 3. The BR for perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) is useless. You are not using it. 3. Some of the "Requires" line are not needed either, rpmbuild peeks them automatically. Your current version of the spec leads to: [wolfy at wolfy2 tmp]$ rpm -qpR remoot-0.9-2.fc10.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_) <== faulty because of issue 1 perl(Benchmark) perl(Benchmark) <==duplicate perl(Tk) perl(Tk) <==duplicate perl(strict) perl(strict) <==duplicate perl(warnings) perl(warnings) <==duplicate rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 compared with: [wolfy at wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qpR /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-x86_64/result /remoot-0.9-2.fc10.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Benchmark) perl(Tk) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 which happens if using Summary: ReMoot is a remote control wrapper Name: remoot Version: 0.9 Release: 3%{?dist} License: Artistic 2.0 Group: Applications/Productivity URL: http://remoot.sourceforge.net/ Source: http://downloads.sf.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildArch: noarch Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082328.m98NSivN016458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-08 19:28:43 EDT --- I have no idea what's going wrong for you. It works reliable for me and others, on the other hand I see no obviuos error in your setup. Anyway: If you want to do a review please try this one. Includes your suggestions from comment #10. http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-lite-0.3.6-1.fc10.src.rpm http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-lite.spec Do you see the icons in the logout dialog? There should be icons since the new version now includes a copy of them, but some people reported missing icons. Looks like a problem with gtk-update-icon-cache. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:38:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082338.m98Nc1Cs023484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #2 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-08 19:37:59 EDT --- Thanks for having a look. I've addressed most of your comments, though not yet the problem with the rulesets. I need to think about how best to handle both the built-in rules and those the user creates. Probably I'll adapt what's in the Debian package, as noted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220#c36 New versions at: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/pyroman/pyroman.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/pyroman/pyroman-0.4.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Once I've a working fix for the rule handling, I'll upload a new version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 8 23:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 19:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810082353.m98NrSPK026661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #9 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-08 19:53:27 EDT --- Thanks again. Have uploaded: http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/gnomint/gnomint.spec http://verdurin.fedorapeople.org/review/gnomint/gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm in the light of your comments. One thing I noticed during rpmbuild is the message "/home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/applications/gnomint.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing". Would it be cleaner to remove the "Application" category with a patch, rather than using the --remove-category option? Or doesn't it really matter? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 00:01:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090001.m9901EBX028731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #3 from Brian Pepple 2008-10-08 20:01:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I hope that I fixed all points in the right way because I'm still in the > 'learn-how-to-make-packages' phase. Unfortunately this packages depends on > 'libgarmin' that is no available in Fedora. So I have to pack 'libgarmin' > first and then we can go on with this package. Sorry about getting back to you late, but I've been swamped the last few weeks. Anyway, has libgarmin been submitted for a package review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 00:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] New: Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Summary: Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smallvil at get9.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/alee-fonts/alee-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/alee-fonts/srpm/alee-fonts-12-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Alee family of Korean TrueType fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 00:28:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 20:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090028.m990SKi4001796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-08 20:28:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnomint Short Description: Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool Owners: verdurin Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: verdurin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 01:39:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 21:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090139.m991dIqJ010607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-08 21:39:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > One thing I noticed during rpmbuild is the message > "/home/adam/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/applications/gnomint.desktop: > key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, > fixing". > > Would it be cleaner to remove the "Application" category with a patch, rather > than using the --remove-category option? Or doesn't it really matter? It does not matter because as the message says desktop-file-install fixes this "Category does not end with semicolon" common mistake. If you want to fix this by patch it should modify gui/gnomint.desktop.in like: -------------------------------------------------------- Categories=GNOME;System;Security; -------------------------------------------------------- (i.e. Security must have semicolon), however as I said desktop-file-install fixes this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:37:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090237.m992bUPw023173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #11 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-08 22:37:29 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:38:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090238.m992cNF8028576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:42:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090242.m992gDtA029170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-08 22:42:12 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090245.m992jkSr029783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090253.m992roTx025374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 02:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 22:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090253.m992rL7V030876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #12 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-08 22:53:20 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 04:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090448.m994mNTe017779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #34 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-09 00:48:20 EDT --- Files in rep/%{version}/%{_host}/ were moved from %{_libexecdir}/rep/... to %{_libdir}/rep/... Not sure when, how and what for? This makes sawfish specs, ahem, "interesting" as they work or not depending only on with which version of librep you are trying to compile without any real interface changes in this library. Sawfish will compile but %files section will change depending on circumstances. It is possible to check in specs where librep in use puts 'rep' and define %{librepwhere} accordingly to be used in %files; it looks like an extra bother. Was this an attempt to make librep and sawfish "multilib"? I miss a purpose of such exercise although maybe there is one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 05:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 01:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090540.m995eqht026635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 01:40:50 EDT --- Now this package itself is good. So as I wrote in comment 13, I will wait for your another review request or pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 06:08:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 02:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090608.m99680ao031766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 02:07:59 EDT --- For 1.0-0.2 * SourceURL - SourceURL seems 404. By the way is 1.0 really released? * Requires/Obsoletes (In reply to comment #10) > but i don't know if i not add > requires for gstreamer-plugins-base < 0.10.19 the one can install > gstreamer-java which is not working in some case which is the reason for > requires in spec file.... - In this case I don't think we must ensure the full function of gstreamer-java should work. While it may be reasonable to add "Requires: gstreamer-plugins-base >= 0.10.19", IMO "Requires: gstreamer-plugins-good >= 0.10.7" is superfluous and this Requires (i.e. for gstreamer-plugins-good) should be changed to "Conflicts". By the way it is safe to add "Conflicts: gstreamer-plugins-ugly < 0.10.7" or so. * Group - of -javadoc subpackage should simply be "Documentation". * Pre-shipped binaries - Would you explain what many binary files under .hg directory are? Cannot this directory completely be deleted? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 06:58:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 02:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090658.m996wDeb008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rezso at rdsor.ro) | --- Comment #17 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-09 02:58:11 EDT --- Folks, 'September 17th 2008 - Ming 0.4.2 (0.4 Release Candidate 2) has been Released!' - At last in .fc10 we can have it. - I am interested to have it as mapserver dependency - I would like to give away this review-request if dont mind (i remain as Cc) It's not the first one package walking in baby-steps and its already in fc10, I don't see any technical/social stopper to proceed with an .rc2 whatever. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 07:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 03:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090702.m9972qB4010124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(rezso at rdsor.ro) | --- Comment #3 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-09 03:02:50 EDT --- Tasaka, Accidentaly I lost original src.rpm lefting RH at that time :( Do you still have it 'by coincidence' ? If so, and don't mind can you give it to me and try push this issue out ? /Cristian. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 07:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 03:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251710] Review Request: potrace - Transforming bitmaps into vector graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090716.m997GQEZ008192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251710 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 03:16:25 EDT --- Umm.. unfortunately locate does not find out your srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 07:50:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 03:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090750.m997olw6015840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org --- Comment #6 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 03:50:45 EDT --- lxde-common.src:87: E: files-attr-not-set lxde-common.src:88: E: files-attr-not-set lxde-common.src:89: E: files-attr-not-set 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090805.m9985LdA024093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 04:05:20 EDT --- Last rc I tested, there was still an issue with the perl bindings. As far as I know this is the only issue remaining that I would prefer to have fixed before packaging in fedora. Sourceforge cvs doesn't work for me today so I can't check that it is fixed or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090825.m998PTXG022331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 04:25:26 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319834) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319834) gdb log on segv of rev 3466 Well, I tried revision 3466 but it still crashes as attached. Would you contact the upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090832.m998WCHr023960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 04:32:11 EDT --- This package provides /etc/xdg/lxsession/LXDE/default with the following contents: smproxy xscreensaver -no-splash openbox --config-file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/openbox/lxde-rc.xml lxpanel --profile LXDE pcmanfm -d Now, smproxy doesn't exist (since you don't require xorg-x11-xsm any more). xscreensaver doesn't exist either. openbox refuses to start because there is no /etc/xdg/openbox/lxde-rc.xml lxpanel also refuses to start, saying the config file doesn't exist. pcmanfm does seem to start. Yay! :) When I choose LXDE at the gdm login prompt, I'm presented with a blank screen with just the programs I set to start up in my GNOME session (ssh-add, gmpc). What am I missing? Hopefully just some missing Requires: in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090837.m998blwt025781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:37:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090837.m998bSj0025689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 04:37:26 EDT --- During the build, there is: ./config.status: line 1119: ./intltool-extract.in: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `intltool-extract.out': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-extract': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-extract': No such file or directory ./config.status: line 1119: ./intltool-merge.in: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `intltool-merge.out': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-merge': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-merge': No such file or directory ./config.status: line 1119: ./intltool-update.in: No such file or directory mv: cannot stat `intltool-update.out': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-update': No such file or directory chmod: cannot access `intltool-update': No such file or directory However .mo files are installed. * rpmlint is silent * free software with license file * match upstream 909c3b0f4c6e4855f64dfbb47467c0b3 lxsession-lite-0.3.6.tar.gz * follow guidelines * %files section right I still suggest make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' to keep the man pages timestamps, but if they are generated this is pointless, I haven't verified. In any case it is not a blocker. More problematic, is the fact that source timestamps is not kept: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 229644 Jun 11 20:49 ../SOURCES/lxsession-lite-0.3.6.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 229644 Jun 8 19:13 lxsession-lite-0.3.6.tar.gz please use wget -N, spectool -g or the appropriate curl option. Since the stamps are similar it may also be an issue with sourceforge or upstream, though. If you fix this timestamp issue: APPROVED It seems to me that this package should need more testing before going into a stable branch, however, it could also be argued that the whole lxde stack is not that mature and that it is better to have more testing, and therefore add it to stable releases for maximal coverage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090840.m998eS8x026541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #20 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-09 04:40:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Created an attachment (id=319834) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319834) [details] > gdb log on segv of rev 3466 > > Well, I tried revision 3466 but it still crashes > as attached. > Would you contact the upstream? I have - waiting for a response. I'll try to replicate the segfault in the meantime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 08:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 04:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090842.m998gPOX031186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 04:42:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I have no idea what's going wrong for you. It works reliable for me and others, > on the other hand I see no obviuos error in your setup. I have had many problems with X lately, but I don't think this is at that level. I don't have anything special I can think of. I use xdm with custom session chooser in general, but here I tested with kdm. In general I use fluxbox. I launched openbox after installing lxde-common to see if it was an issue with openbox, and apparently openbox worked fine. I follow rawhide quite closely and I have a bunch of packages installed, but I don't have an idea about what could be special. > Do you see the icons in the logout dialog? There should be icons since the new > version now includes a copy of them, but some people reported missing icons. > Looks like a problem with gtk-update-icon-cache. I have never seen a logout dialog since I have never login... the window manager is never started for me (still able to zap X). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:12:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:12:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] New: Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Sysadm-Install/perl-Sysadm-Install.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Sysadm-Install/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Have you ever wished for your installation shell scripts to run reproducably, without much programming fuzz, and even with optional logging enabled? Then give up shell programming, use Perl. "Sysadm::Install" executes shell-like commands performing typical installation tasks: Copying files, extracting tarballs, calling "make". It has a "fail once and die" policy, meticulously checking the result of every operation and calling "die()" immediately if anything fails. "Sysadm::Install" also supports a *dry_run* mode, in which it logs everything, but suppresses any write actions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:13:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090913.m999D5YH002166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 05:13:04 EDT --- A few small bits that need to be cleaned up. + rpmlint output rpmlint -i dahdi-2.0.0-0.4.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i dahdi*2.0.0-0.4.fc9.x86_64.rpm dahdi.x86_64: E: no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/dahdi In your init script (/etc/rc.d/init.d/your_file), you don't have a 'status' entry, which is necessary for good functionality. 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file you don't need to include README etc in all subpackages, just the main package + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm c09f880e67305bf5561c8030958b9fb9 dahdi-linux-2.0.0.tar.gz 31e48ed37e43662b0f8fbf146e192b66 dahdi-tools-2.0.0.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested with a koji scratch build on all platforms - BuildRequires list all build dependencies the perl BuildReq needs to be moved up with the rest, the BuildReq are for entire package group, not sub packages n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files - packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file see gtk2 point below. + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin A couple of other things: - Why are the modprobe noreplace? If there are new devices or blacklists added between releases this wouldn't be automatically picked up. %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi.blacklist - the main dahdi package requires the perl modules so should depend on it. Are the perl modules usable without the main package installed, if not there is no point of the subpackage - why does it need gtk2-devel? It builds fine without it and the configure script doesn't check for it. - The release number should be 2.0.0-1 not 2.0.0-0.4 (ie the final 0.x usually designates a pre or RC release) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:18:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090918.m999IOdw007073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #35 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 05:18:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Was this an attempt to make librep and sawfish > "multilib"? I miss a purpose of such exercise although > maybe there is one? If there is %{_host} it shouldn't be problematic with respect with multilib (at least regarding file conflicts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090941.m999fupQ012462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #4 from Anthony Messina 2008-10-09 05:41:54 EDT --- Excellent work Jeff, and thank you!. I've been following your devel process on this as I'm just about prepared to switch over to DAHDI (when you're able to build the asterisk-1.6 RPMs. In conjunction with that, I'll be building my own kernel modules package and I'm trying to keep it so that it will fit nicely with your official Fedora packages. On that note, would it be unreasonable to suggest that the resulting package that contains everything except -per -libs and -devel be named "dahdi-tools" to stay inline with the upstream naming? Then folks would be looking for: dahdi-tools dahdi-perl dahdi-libs dahdi-devel from Fedora, and looking for (perhaps): dahdi-linux-`uname -r` dahdi-firmware either by building themselves or from people like me or Axel Thimm. It's not a big deal, just a suggestion. Again, thanks for the work. I hope to see this accepted soon so we can move up on asterisk-1.6.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090949.m999niiF009730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #18 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-09 05:49:43 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru. Should I wait for bug #459631 successful review before requesting sponsorship, or may I submit request already ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232790] Review Request: ming - SWF output library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090952.m999qdGp014182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232790 --- Comment #19 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 05:52:38 EDT --- My latest srpm is at: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/ming-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm But if you uncomment the %check section you'll see that the perl tests fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090956.m999ukQk011363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 05:56:45 EDT --- I will sponsor you so please submit sponsorship request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 09:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 05:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810090956.m999uUoc011305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 05:56:29 EDT --- It would be dahdi-tools-* for the rest and is probably reasonable as even though it uses -linux for building it is essentially the dahdi-tools package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 10:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 06:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091008.m99A8J1V013753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 --- Comment #20 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-09 06:08:18 EDT --- I just applied to the packager group. My FAS name is "monnerat" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091102.m99B2r7p024741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 07:02:52 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091121.m99BLSsW031916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 07:21:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I know, but this is exactly the problem. lxde-settings is arch dependend while > the rest of the package is noarch. I think I'm going to split out the > nuoveXT-icon-theme completely anyway but I'm unsure what do to with the rest. > I'd like to have two packages called lxde-common and lxde-settings, both have > different arches. I don't think this is very important, at this point. Just have an arch package with regular subpackages and follow what upstream does. Moreover, with the new rpm it seems that noarch subpackages of arch packages are possible, so it could be used in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:27:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091127.m99BRYXQ029591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091127.m99BRXYv029568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |466237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:26:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466237] New: Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-File-Comments/perl-File-Comments.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-File-Comments/perl-File-Comments-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: File::Comments guesses the type of a given file, determines the format used for comments, extracts all comments, and returns them as a reference to an array of chunks. Alternatively, it strips all comments from a file. Currently supported are Perl scripts, C/C++ programs, Java, makefiles, JavaScript, Python and PHP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091139.m99Bd9oU002917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-09 07:39:08 EDT --- Upstream has agreed to my suggestion to split out lxde-settings in the next release, see http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=9d9f04bb0808261048s2b7467a9p606147750d993b87%40mail.gmail.com I have split out the icon theme to avoid unnecessary updates of data that did not change. Going to publish a new package later today, stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091154.m99BsIOx002457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-09 07:54:17 EDT --- Assigning to marek, since he already informally began the review and pointed out problems that were in turn solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:55:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091155.m99Bt8JY002883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-09 07:55:07 EDT --- Last time I checked rpmlint was silent, and mock builds in el5 and devel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 11:53:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 07:53:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] New: Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Summary: Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/starlab.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/starlab-4.4.3-2.el5.src.rpm Description: Starlab is a collection of modular software tools designed to simulate the evolution of stars and stellar systems, and analyze the resulting data. Starlab consists of a library of loosely coupled programs, sharing a common flexible data structure, which can be combined in arbitrarily complex ways to study the dynamics and evolution of binary and multiple star systems, star clusters and galactic nuclei. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 12:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463744] Review Request: screenruler - GNOME screen ruler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091221.m99CL8Q9012596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463744 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-09 08:21:07 EDT --- Imported into cvs and built in koji. Thank you Debarshi Ray for doing the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 12:18:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091218.m99CIkWG011846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 --- Comment #6 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-09 08:18:44 EDT --- Hi Peter, I think I can just continue from where I left it off. ISSUES: * Is there any particular reason you're not following http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets#GConf, I think the Gconf scriplet (and scrollkeeper too) needs more work (comment #2). * rpmlint still gives warnings. They are mostly ignorable, but I think the handling of obsoleted gnomemeeting should follow the guildlines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages ; >> [deji at agape Download]$ rpmlint ekiga-3.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm ekiga.src:37: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes gnomemeeting ekiga.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 71, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [deji at agape Download]$ rpmlint ekiga-3.0.0-4.fc10.x86_64.rpm ekiga.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/ekiga.schemas ekiga.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided gnomemeeting << -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 12:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091249.m99Cn4ZE015641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 Andrew Cagney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cagney at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #16 from Andrew Cagney 2008-10-09 08:49:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Can you request for CVS and build this package and Close this review? Ok (I've now got my CVS working). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 12:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 08:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091254.m99Csl4s017116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #25 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-10-09 08:54:45 EDT --- I have send the mail 5 days ago, i don't think a reviewer will accept it. I will try to convince upstream to change the name of the "trash" command. If they don't want to change, i will rename it in the package. In this case, should I edit http://distributions.freedesktop.org/wiki/ConflictingFiles and send a mail to the distributions mailing list of FreeDesktop as someone advise me in devel ml ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 13:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091311.m99DB04t021494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-09 09:10:58 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/nagios-plugins-rsync-1.02-0.1.fc9.ppc.rpm nagios-plugins-rsync.ppc: W: no-documentation nagios-plugins-rsync.ppc: E: no-binary nagios-plugins-rsync.ppc: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ Fortunately, these messages may be safely omitted. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The source package doesn't include the text of the license(s) in its own file. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum check_rsync* bebe128f15e073abf414930e594a7984 check_rsync bebe128f15e073abf414930e594a7984 check_rsync.new [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (ppc). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No locales + No shared libraries + The package isn't designed to be relocatable + The package doesn't create directories. + The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files + The package doesn't include anything as %doc. + No header files. + No static libraries. + No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + No library files. + No devel packages + No .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI app + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The packager SHOULD query upstream to include license text(s) as a separate file. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 13:31:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091331.m99DVS8w026251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #31 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-09 09:31:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: flite New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: peter faucamp Note: I already asked Francois about EPEL-branches, and he hasn't any objections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 13:55:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091355.m99DtVnn031283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #26 from Jean-Fran?ois Martin 2008-10-09 09:55:29 EDT --- I have received a answer from upstream, they will change the command. Will wait next release and update the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 13:54:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 423821] Review Request: nagios-plugins-rsync - Nagios plugin to monitor remote rsync servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091354.m99Ds6j5001567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423821 --- Comment #15 from Jima 2008-10-09 09:54:05 EDT --- Pinging upstream, will hold off on importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 13:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091358.m99DwfHx002718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 09:58:40 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 14:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091435.m99EZaN2010018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 14:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091435.m99EZQ5o009969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 10:35:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I uploaded a new version: > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec > http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-2.fc8.src.rpm Unfortunately the build still fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=869104 Note that as I am sponsoring you now, you can try to rebuild your srpm on koji as below: $ koji build --scratch where currently can be "dist-f11" "dist-f10" "dist-f9-updates-candidate" or "dist-f8-updates-candidate". If the build is successful, the rebuilt binary rpms and some logs are saved (for about one week under) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 14:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091453.m99ErJ0F011218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #36 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-09 10:53:18 EDT --- > If there is %{_host} ... You mean that architecture shows up as a part of %{_host}? In that case was the move in question dictated by other considerations? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:01:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091501.m99F16Lv013564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #4 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-10-09 11:01:05 EDT --- Oops. Forgot links. Spec file: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase.spec RPM: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/RPMS/i386/python-sybase-0.39-3.i386.rpm SRPM: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:04:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091504.m99F4flT016853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Peter Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pjones at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Peter Jones 2008-10-09 11:04:40 EDT --- > %build > make %{?_smp_mflags} > > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > "make" should be using CFLAGS="%{optflags}", and %install should be using %makeinstall (though I'm not sure the latter will make any difference in this case at all.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 14:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 10:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091459.m99ExZHO015593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 andy at gohanman.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from andy at gohanman.com 2008-10-09 10:59:33 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. Lost track of it in my inbox. I made most of the changes you pointed out. The python rpm info was particularly helpful. It's all macros now. I did not add python-setuptools to BuildRequires because it builds without that package installed (for me, anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:09:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:09:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091509.m99F95Hc015188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Peter Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091510.m99FAWUA015718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #8 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 11:10:31 EDT --- The Makefile in the package uses $RPM_OPT_FLAGS if set, so there should be no need to override... ifdef RPM_OPT_FLAGS OPT_FLAGS := $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) else OPT_FLAGS := -O2 -g -Wall endif I've confirmed that the appropriate make flags do get used. You're right; make install won't make any difference :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:09:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091509.m99F9WCS017911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 Peter Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:11:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091511.m99FBhn2015958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #9 from Peter Jones 2008-10-09 11:11:42 EDT --- rpmlint results: pjones2:~/Download$ rpmlint openconnect-0.94-2.fc9.src.rpm openconnect.spec 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091516.m99FGENw016802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #10 from Peter Jones 2008-10-09 11:16:13 EDT --- COPYING.LGPL should be listed in %files as a %doc . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091524.m99FOAQ3020956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #11 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 11:24:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/openconnect-f9/openconnect-0.94-3.fc9.src.rpm Use %makeinstall, include COPYING.LGPL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:30:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091530.m99FUhU0020016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #27 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 11:30:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I have send the mail 5 days ago, i don't think a reviewer will accept it. You're really out of luck, or maybe it is because it stirred some debate, since I see other packages with very debatable names entering the distro which shows that many reviewers don't care (I don't have the time to comment on all th ereviews, especially these days I am very busy)... In fact my interest for the package turned out to be a disadvantage :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:34:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091534.m99FYTw2023508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 11:34:28 EDT --- Wait, why %makeinstall? We have an explicit prohibition against it unless the usual "make install DESTDIR=" doesn't work. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091532.m99FW45U023044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #37 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-09 11:32:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > > If there is %{_host} ... > You mean that architecture shows up as a part > of %{_host}? In that case was the move in question > dictated by other considerations? $ rpm --eval %_host i386-redhat-linux-gnu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091537.m99FbgB3021458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #13 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 11:37:41 EDT --- Er, OK. I'll switch back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246368] Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091541.m99FfDgw025419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246368 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 11:41:12 EDT --- I don't know anyone who might want this package; I don't really even know what it does. My only concern here is the open review ticket. I'll mark this as not being ready for review so it doesn't appear in the review queue. If you decide in the future that you'd like a review of this, please clear the status whiteboard, or close the ticket if you decide you no longer want to submit this package. If someone else wants to submit this package, they should close this ticket and open their own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091540.m99FeCnq025176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-09 11:40:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > * Licence has changed: Good catch! > * rpmlint reports wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding for %doc files I had left out the removing of *.tmp files in the hack I had made to convert docs to the right EOF, those were probably the ones reported as having it wrong and it should be fixed now. > * The /usr/bin/css* executables "Requires: python-setuptools" or else > they traceback! Another good catch! > * Group "Applications/Multimedia"? Rather Development/Libraries, but > the groups are too limited. True. Changed. > * The generated html documentation for the API could be put > into a separate -docs package. It's only 100kB uncompressed once the *.tmp files are no longer there, so not worth it IMHO. Thanks a lot for the review. I've put python-cssutils-0.9.5.1-2 in the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 15:45:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226195] Merge Review: newt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091545.m99FjwZF023736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226195 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 11:45:55 EDT --- Wow, somehow this got set to the modified state which causes it to drop completely out of every report I run to indicate the tickets I should be working on. I have no idea why anyone would ever use that state, because it sure screws things up. Let me take another look at things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091610.m99GAFKx029518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:10:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091610.m99GA2Xb029369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 12:10:01 EDT --- Well, which is it? If you're not interested in submitting this package yourself then this ticket should be closed. Otherwise I'll go ahead and indicate that you need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091603.m99G3piU027770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 --- Comment #28 from Andrea Francia 2008-10-09 12:03:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #25) > > I have send the mail 5 days ago, i don't think a reviewer will accept it. > > You're really out of luck, or maybe it is because it stirred some > debate, since I see other packages with very debatable names entering > the distro which shows that many reviewers don't care (I don't have the > time to comment on all th ereviews, especially these days I am very > busy)... In fact my interest for the package turned out to be a > disadvantage :-/ C'est la vie. Thanks fot the interest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091612.m99GCF9w029907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #2 from Emily Ratliff 2008-10-09 12:12:14 EDT --- Some updates based on comments from Srini Ramanatha - including the inclusion of %{dist} in the release led to updates as below: Spec URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb.spec SRPM URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb-1.3.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Small Footprint CIM Broker (sfcb) is a CIM server conforming to the CIM Operations over HTTP protocol. It is robust, with low resource consumption and therefore specifically suited for embedded and resource constrained environments. sfcb supports providers written against the Common Manageability Programming Interface (CMPI). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:21:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091621.m99GL0nb032293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091644.m99GiKuX004711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:45:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091645.m99Gjhro005223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-09 12:45:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Well, > > * SourceURL > - seems 404. The correct one is perhaps: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/divfixpp/%{name}_v%{version}-src.tar.bz2 Ok, sorry. > - So what I am saying is that you must modify cflags what is used > on this tarball by default so that Fedora cflags are used correctly > (i.e. you must use %optflags manually). > Also this tarball uses "-Os" option, which should be removed. > > One of the solution is: > -------------------------------------------------------- > %prep > %setup -q -n %{name}_v%{version} > sed -i.flags -e 's|-Os||' makefile > ...... > ...... > %build > make %{?_smp_mflags} WXCONFIG=wx-config CPP="g++ %optflags" > ------------------------------------------------------- Oh, thank you. I'm put it into spec. > > * Macros > > > - %distname is not defined. > > %distname replaced by %{distribution} > > - My system does not define %distribution macro. Koji seems to > define it, however its value (string) is "Unknown" so > this is still wrong. > Just use "--vendor=fedora". Hmmm. What about this http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat recommendation to opposite do NOT using names like Fedora o Redhat in spec??? And lso in this dociment I get macros %{distribution}... > ! By the way if you put macros in braces please them consistently > for cosmetic issue (i.e. use %{__install}) Ok, I did that. BTW I like better %__install then %{__install}. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/DivFix++/DivFix++-0.30-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] New: Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Summary: Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johnhford at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~jhford/fedora/ario-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: Ario is a GTK2 client for MPD (Music player daemon). The interface used to browse the library is inspired by Rhythmbox but Ario aims to be much lighter and faster. It runs on Linux and Microsoft Windows -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 16:46:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091646.m99GkDkL008166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #1 from John F 2008-10-09 12:46:12 EDT --- Also, this is my first package, so I am looking for a sponsor. I am a student at Seneca College and I am looking to package JBoss for Fedora, so I'd like to become a maintainer so I can work more efficiently on my efforts. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 17:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091733.m99HXx8M013463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #4 from Timon 2008-10-09 13:33:58 EDT --- my FAS ID - timon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 18:35:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091835.m99IZiMF027685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #10 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-09 14:35:42 EDT --- Found the problem: was related to hardcoded "lib" instead of "${libdir}" in autoconf macros. Please find the new version: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-3.fc8.src.rpm Successful build in koji dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=871731 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 18:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091842.m99IgJrY029101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 14:42:18 EDT --- What is the policy on how long the obsolete needs to be provided. ekiga has been in Fedora replacing gnomemeeting since FC5. Given that the oldest supported release is F-8 and soon to be F-9 I think its probably time to drop the obsolete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 18:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091850.m99IoVQk000432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 14:50:30 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages Two releases, basically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466331] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cdahlin at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sadmac.fedorapeople.org/rcov.spec SRPM URL: http://sadmac.fedorapeople.org/rcov-0.8.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A ruby coverage tool rcov is a ruby code coverage tool similar to gcov for C or djunit for Java. It generates reports of which lines have and have not been executed by a test suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466331] Review Request: rcov - ruby code coverage tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091902.m99J29tb003216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466331 Casey Dahlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:12:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091912.m99JCP3f003168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-09 15:12:24 EDT --- response from upstream: So far, I haven't been able to reproduce the crash. It may be specific and reflective of a bug in that particular version of Mesa. The offending call appears to be glBegin(GL_POLYGON), which suggests that the problem may not be PyMOL itself... The version 1.1 SVN source is between releases: 1.1r1 is known to be broken in other ways, but 1.1r2 hasn't yet been Q.C'd...hence the "pre" designation. I'll change the release number accordingly. WRT the opengl issue, is it possible to test using 7.2 of mesa-libGL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 18:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091853.m99IrOrS001009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-09 14:53:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) [...] > and %install should be using > %makeinstall (though I'm not sure the latter will make any difference in this > case at all.) Definitely NOT. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 18:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091804.m99I4pF4020558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 14:04:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=319888) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319888) License analysis Well, * About itext-no-rups.patch: - Would you explain what "it depends on proprietary com.sun classes" means? I am not familiar with Java, however as far as I checked quickly * About pdf-renderer.jar: Is it different from the below? https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net/ https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net/files/documents/6008/113009/PDFRenderer-2008_10_05-src.zip It is available under LGPLv2+ * About dom4j-1.6.1.jar Fedora has "dom4j" rpm, of which the license says BSD * License - My analysis attached. The license tag should be "(LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1) and and ASL2.0 and BSD and MIT" ( + "+ LGPLv2+ and CC-BY" if you build rups part) * SourceURL - Please consider to use %version macro. With using this macro you probably won't have to change SourceURL when version is upgraded. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D * Requires - bouncycastle-mail Requires bouncycastle so "Requires: bouncycastle" is not needed. * Provides - For upgrade path and so on, this type of Provides (Provides: iText) should be full EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific. * GCJ AOT - For (Build)Requires/Scriptlets, please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines ! By the way -------------------------------------------------- %post -p %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db -------------------------------------------------- cannot be used because this is a shell script. * %prep -------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -c -T -n %{name}-%{version} gzip -dc %{SOURCE0} | tar xf - -------------------------------------------------- - can be: -------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -c -T -a 0 -------------------------------------------------- * %defattr - We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * -javadoc subpackage - As javadoc package is for documentation, there is no need to mark %{_javadocdir}/%{name}-%{version} as %doc explicitly. - For Requires of javadoc subpackage please follow %package javadoc section of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:30:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091930.m99JUq3h009184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-09 15:30:51 EDT --- Emily, thank you for packaging this up. > echo "%doc %{_datadir}/man/man1/*" >> _pkg_list Please remove the %doc from this line. > sed s?$RPM_BUILD_ROOT??g _pkg_list > _pkg_list_2 > mv -f _pkg_list_2 _pkg_list You can use sed -i (in place edit) to avoid the need to do the mv. schema subpackage has only a single directory, no files in /usr/share/sfcb/CIM. Are these created at runtime or at install time? If other packages will be laying down files in there (and thus own them), that's fine, but then you should use %dir %{_datadir}/sfcb/CIM/ and the license on an empty directory is then the same as the main package. bug: initscript is named 'sfcb' but chkconfig and service calls in %post use sblim-sfcb. Then you won't need the exit 0 line either. Can you get sfcb to put its 19 dlopen()d libraries (plus their two symlinks each, 57 files in total) into %{_libdir}/sblim-sfcb/* instead of %{_libdir}, drop a .conf file into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ and remove the rpaths? Would be cleaner. also, the .so name vs other names. This is because support.c has: void *loadLibib(const char *libname) { char filename[255]; sprintf(filename, "lib%s.so", libname); return dlopen(filename, RTLD_LAZY); } As these are private libraries included with the package, it would seem one could use the .so.0 name instead of the .so name, and could eliminate the .so symlink entirely (as you don't need it for a devel package, nothing links to these). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091931.m99JVYRR009417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-09 15:31:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/dahdi/dahdi-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~jcollie/dahdi/dahdi-tools-2.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm I believe that this addresses all of the points made so far, except: (In reply to comment #3) > - Why are the modprobe noreplace? If there are new devices or blacklists added > between releases this wouldn't be automatically picked up. > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi.blacklist I marked them this way so that if the user makes changes to these files they won't get blown away when an upgrade happens. If the user doesn't make any changes the new files should get overwritten silently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226643] Merge Review: xorg-x11-server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091938.m99Jc64J008443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226643 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:38:05 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226136] Merge Review: mesa In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091937.m99JbgP4010408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226136 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:37:41 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091942.m99Jg8kQ009341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:42:06 EDT --- Okay, so I tried to reach Daniel Barron, but was unsucessful. Based on that, RH Legal advises us to do this: Get rid of the initial sentence in the license header (in every place that it appears in the source): //Please refer to http://dansguardian.org/?page=copyright2 //for the license for this code. Replace it with this: //Copyright (C) Daniel Barron. You can do this in a patch, you do not need to make a modified tarball. Mark the package as GPLv2+, because that is what we will be distributing under. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: brickshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091955.m99JtLFv012102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:55:20 EDT --- Any word from upstream here? If not, you have the choice to either: - Fork it for Fedora, removing the trademark from all user visible locations (you don't need to change file names or function/variable names, for example), make a new tarball with the new name, and maintain it in that fashion. - Drop this package entirely and close out this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091952.m99Jq8Gx013471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:52:05 EDT --- Well, this is right on the line. The function is tetris, but filename doesn't matter. It doesn't actually display that it is "Tetris" when it runs. Let me talk to the lawyers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464471] Review Request: dvdrip - Graphical DVD ripping and encoding tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091953.m99JrHm9013599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464471 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 15:53:16 EDT --- OK, so what use will this have without the ability to read encoded DVD discs? Why would you want to have this here, as opposed to rpmfusion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091956.m99JuMgV014525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #7 from Anthony Messina 2008-10-09 15:56:20 EDT --- I like it, but of course, it's just the opinion of a future user :) I also agree with you about the: > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi.blacklist Those files are where each system gets configured for what cards are in it. I wouldn't want to start loading other modules than what I told it to load. How long until Fedora 8 & 9 updates reo? or at least updates-testing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 19:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 15:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810091951.m99Jpwbo013434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-09 15:51:57 EDT --- I don't really object to it, but I think the first paragraph of %description is content-free in the context of a package description. /usr/bin/one-liner probably should not be shipped; it seems completely pointless, has a generic name, and is already shipped as documentation. My checklist: * source files match upstream: 8cadfb192f92b12d18c0123472924dfe779fefb027051adbff8c7fdcae246778 Sysadm-Install-0.27.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Sysadm::Install) = 0.27 perl-Sysadm-Install = 0.27-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Archive::Tar) perl(Cwd) perl(Expect) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Log::Log4perl::Util) perl(Sysadm::Install) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=43, 1 wallclock secs * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092004.m99K4php016370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 16:04:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I like it, but of course, it's just the opinion of a future user :) > > I also agree with you about the: > > > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi > > %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/modprobe.d/dahdi.blacklist > > Those files are where each system gets configured for what cards are in it. I > wouldn't want to start loading other modules than what I told it to load. It was a query, I'm use to most kernel modules being auto-configured so that what is put in place by the is usually enough so if the distro updated the blacklist etc you'd want it updated. If these cards are different that's fine. > How long until Fedora 8 & 9 updates reo? or at least updates-testing? Well the package would need to get into rawhide first, then be pushed to testing from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:20:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092020.m99KKkpd020312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:20:44 EDT --- Will, any word from Broadcom? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092016.m99KGaNi019339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:16:35 EDT --- Still waiting for their more formal statement, sent another email today reminding them that we are waiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458974] Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092019.m99KJ4Cw019750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:19:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092019.m99KJ6C8019799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Bug 459125 depends on bug 458974, which changed state. Bug 458974 Summary: Review Request: OpenCASCADE - The OpenCASCADE framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458974 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092017.m99KHnhF019532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:17:47 EDT --- The design patents in play here have all long since expired, something I didn't notice initially, because I didn't realize that design patents have a much shorter life. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:32:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092032.m99KWFQ6020097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-09 16:32:13 EDT --- Forgot to mention: dahdi-tools.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name dahdi Is the only remaining rpmlint complaint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092034.m99KYke8020508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #12 from Will Woods 2008-10-09 16:34:45 EDT --- Still haven't heard anything. I guess I could try again but they don't seem particularly eager to talk to me about firmware distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:39:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092039.m99Kdgms021850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #13 from Will Woods 2008-10-09 16:39:41 EDT --- I just want to note that Broadcom's pre-existing agreement seems to cover this case: "The BlueZ project has permission from Broadcom Corporation to distribute this firmware in conjunction with the BlueZ GPLd tools ... as long as the notice contained in /usr/share/doc/bluez-firmware/BCM-LEGAL.txt accompanies the firmware." To me it seems fairly clear - freely redistributable, so long as that file is included. But I'm still not a lawyer. So I'd suggest that someone who *is* a lawyer email the folks listed in the message from comment #1: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/b/bluez-firmware/bluez-firmware_1.2-1/bluez-firmware.copyright and get someone to confirm that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092043.m99KhK8W025441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 16:43:19 EDT --- OK. I've updated the spec for I think everything mentioned. I've also added script sections for updating the icon cache as I think it should be there as well. The spec is in cvs and I've done a scratch build (links below) as I wanted someone to check the script changes before I push it to rawhide. It works fine for me though. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ekiga/devel/ekiga.spec?revision=1.58&view=markup http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872034 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:53:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226813] Merge Review: zsh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092053.m99KrjQN027641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226813 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:53:44 EDT --- So, the lawyers and I are in agreement here. We do not need to remove the "tetris" file, because: * It does not describe itself as "Tetris" when it is executed. Functions and filenames are not a concern for trademark infringement. The notable difference between this and the emacs case is that the emacs "tetris" clearly describes itself as "Tetris" when it is executed. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 20:56:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 16:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 258681] Review Request: bluez-firmware - Bluetooth firmware distributed by the BlueZ project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092056.m99KuATW025908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=258681 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-09 16:56:09 EDT --- Will, the problem here is that we do not have permission to distribute that firmware without it being "in conjunction with the BlueZ GPLd tools". Putting that firmware in a separate "bluez-firmware" package would violate that license, thus, it is not freely redistributable. We need permission from Broadcom to be able to distribute this firmware without any sort of "bundling" restrictions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:02:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:02:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092102.m99L2qxM027361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 17:02:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Forgot to mention: > > dahdi-tools.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name dahdi > > Is the only remaining rpmlint complaint. Doing a quick look through /etc/init.d on one of my systems I can see nfs/nfslock are in the nfs-utils package, the bluez-utils has a number of different named init scripts to name a few. Just finishing up the review now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092106.m99L6W6H030841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-09 17:06:31 EDT --- It looks good now to me. Approved! + rpmlint output $ rpmlint -v dahdi-tools-2.0.0-1.fc9.src.rpm dahdi-tools.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v dahdi-tools*2.0.0-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm dahdi-tools.x86_64: I: checking dahdi-tools.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dahdi dahdi-tools-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking dahdi-tools-devel.x86_64: I: checking dahdi-tools-libs.x86_64: I: checking 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file you don't need to include README etc in all subpackages, just the main package + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm c09f880e67305bf5561c8030958b9fb9 dahdi-linux-2.0.0.tar.gz 31e48ed37e43662b0f8fbf146e192b66 dahdi-tools-2.0.0.tar.gz + package successfully builds on at least one architecture tested with a koji scratch build on all platforms + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel + devel must require the fully versioned base + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (basic testing) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:11:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092111.m99LBNgq029195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-09 17:11:21 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dahdi-tools Short Description: Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules Owners: jcollie Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: jcollie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:12:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092112.m99LC1uK031790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #13 from Jeffrey C. Ollie 2008-10-09 17:12:00 EDT --- Oops... add one more branch: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dahdi-tools Short Description: Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules Owners: jcollie Branches: F-10 F-9 F-8 EL-5 InitialCC: jcollie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:20:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459125] Review Request: FreeCAD - An extensible Open Source CAx program for Unix/X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092120.m99LKc3V001051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459125 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:23:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:23:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092123.m99LNiMI001431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Marek Mahut 2008-10-09 17:23:43 EDT --- + source files match upstream: 211f313ffbef0e7a477c234ee00b8adb (upstream changes this from time to time) + package meets naming and versioning guidelines + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently + dist tag is present + %clean is present + package builds in mock (f8, devel) + package installs properly (f8) - file /usr/bin/starplot from install of starlab-4.4.3-1.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package starplot-0.95.5-1.fc8.i386 Please fix this issue, probably by renaming (and documenting) it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092127.m99LRjH4031961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:27:44 EDT --- pypop-0.7.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSh2o032285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSccF032245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:28:37 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSVTn032187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:28:30 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSSu0032156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:28:27 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSYdV032218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:28:33 EDT --- python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc8, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc8, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc8, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc8, python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSk45032319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 459175 depends on bug 459172, which changed state. Bug 459172 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:27:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092127.m99LRPhQ002211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:27:24 EDT --- perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092127.m99LRmGs002261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092131.m99LVTFP003542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:31:28 EDT --- python-prioritized-methods-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSeDk002473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSIf8002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:28:17 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update opticalraytracer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:28:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092128.m99LSn56002509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 459177 depends on bug 459172, which changed state. Bug 459172 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 459177 depends on bug 459176, which changed state. Bug 459176 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Bug 459177 depends on bug 459175, which changed state. Bug 459175 Summary: Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458030] Review Request: avogadro - Avogadro is an advanced Molecular editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092131.m99LVsFv001188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458030 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:31:53 EDT --- avogadro-0.8.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:34:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092134.m99LYfTh001623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:34:40 EDT --- nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092131.m99LVWCm001127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:32:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459177] Review Request: python-peak-rules - Generic functions and business rules support systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092132.m99LWfcE001353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459177 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:32:40 EDT --- python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc9, python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc9, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc9, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc9, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:32:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459175] Review Request: python-peak-util-assembler - Generate Python code objects by "assembling" bytecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092132.m99LWcoW001327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459175 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:32:37 EDT --- python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc9, python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc9, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc9, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc9, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:34:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092134.m99LYBAH001539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:34:10 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update opticalraytracer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:33:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092133.m99LXvfB004421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:33:57 EDT --- pypop-0.7.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:33:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092133.m99LXiks004389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:33:43 EDT --- ms-sys-2.1.3-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092134.m99LYJFd004519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:34:18 EDT --- perl-Text-SpellChecker-0.03-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092133.m99LXRSe004287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:33:26 EDT --- nagios-plugins-check_sip-1.2-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462523] Review Request: python-prioritized-methods - An extension to PEAK-Rules to prioritize methods in order to to avoid AmbiguousMethods situations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092135.m99LZwjI005254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:35:58 EDT --- python-prioritized-methods-0.2.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446847] Review Request: nagios-plugins-check_sip - A Nagios plugin to check SIP servers and devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092133.m99LXTBD004322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446847 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:32:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459176] Review Request: python-peak-util-addons - Dynamically extend other objects with AddOns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092132.m99LWZhL004155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459176 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:32:34 EDT --- python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc9, python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc9, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc9, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc9, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459172] Review Request: python-peak-util-symbols - Simple "symbol" type, useful for enumerations or sentinels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092132.m99LWW6M004114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459172 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:32:31 EDT --- python-peak-util-symbols-1.0-1.fc9, python-peak-util-assembler-0.5-1.fc9, python-peak-util-extremes-1.1-1.fc9, python-peak-util-addons-0.6-1.fc9, python-peak-rules-0.5a1.dev-0.2569.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:36:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092136.m99LaagR005581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-09 17:36:35 EDT --- ms-sys-2.1.3-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 21:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092159.m99Lx1Dk009738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #14 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-09 17:59:00 EDT --- #12 - The docs should be in their own subpackage. It doesn't matter if there is only one file in the -devel subpackage, the guidelines say that the .pc file should be in the -devel subpackage, so there it goes. Quite a few mono -devel subpackages only contain the .pc file (mono-basic generates it's own from the spec file) The patch is also not really required sed -i -e 's!${exec_prefix}/lib!%{_libdir}!' notify-sharp.pc.in should fix the problem with minimal fuss #13 - You need to remove the smp_mflags from the build script (it should fix the problem). Again, mono apps don't always like smp_mflags being set (monodevelop really gets upset at parallel builds going on). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:20:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092220.m99MKqXw014157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #15 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-10-09 18:20:51 EDT --- Updated package: - Replace with simple sed line in spec - Build documentation, add monodoc dependencies. Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/notify-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.4.20080912svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:21:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465362] Review Request: openconnect -- client for Cisco AnyConnect VPN In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092221.m99MLCcj011325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465362 --- Comment #15 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-09 18:21:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openconnect.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.infradead.org/pub/openconnect-f9/openconnect-0.95-1.fc9.src.rpm No %makeinstall. New upstream version with a few minor bug fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:31:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092231.m99MVCS6015790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #16 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-09 18:31:11 EDT --- Spec file fault. doc subpackage, the requires is wrong. It doesn't need pkgconfig, but does need monodoc! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:44:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092244.m99Mi8ov014503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-09 18:44:07 EDT --- jebba: Can you address the items from comment #14? The compile flags may need a Makefile patch. ;( Thank you Mamoru for spotting those. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:43:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092243.m99MhAW8014391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #17 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-10-09 18:43:09 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/notify-sharp.spec SRPM URL: http://sindrepb.fedorapeople.org/packages/notify-sharp-0.4.0-0.5.20080912svn.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:48:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] New: Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Summary: Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: uwe at kubosch.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kubosch.no/~donv/zfs-fuse/SPECS/zfs-fuse.spec SRPM URL: http://kubosch.no/~donv/zfs-fuse/SRPMS/zfs-fuse-0.5.0-2.20081009.fc9.src.rpm Description: ZFS is an advanced modern general-purpose filesystem from Sun Microsystems, originally designed for Solaris/OpenSolaris. This is my first package. Denis Leroy has offered to be my sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:48:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092248.m99MmdDC018483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-09 18:48:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't really object to it, but I think the first paragraph of %description is > content-free in the context of a package description. OK, I stripped that paragraph and added a few words about logging to the second paragraph. > /usr/bin/one-liner probably should not be shipped; it seems completely > pointless, has a generic name, and is already shipped as documentation. I initially %exclude-d this for those very reasons but changed my mind as I thought it seemed a handy way of running methods from the module quickly from the command line. You're right though, it's very generic and doesn't seem to documented as a feature of the module so I've %exclude-d it again. > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. Getting the sendmail merge review moving again is on my to-do list... Revised package: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Sysadm-Install/perl-Sysadm-Install.spec http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Sysadm-Install/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 22:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465944] Review Request: perl-Text-SpellChecker - OO interface for spell-checking a block of text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092251.m99MpKQJ016274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465944 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-09 18:51:19 EDT --- I think we're done here now. Thanks everybody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:09:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092309.m99N9QRC022196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #6 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-10-09 19:09:25 EDT --- I updated them again: Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/globalplatform.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/globalplatform-5.0.0-3.fc10.src.rpm A few more questions: - It seems to me that pkg-config --cflags globalplatform should not just return "-pthread -I/usr/include/PCSC" but something like "-pthread -I/usr/include/GlobalPlatform -I/usr/include/PCSC" right? So maybe includedir=@includedir@ should become: includedir=@includedir@/GlobalPlatform instead? - Does it make sense to submit the inclusion of the pkgconfig file upstream (as the requirement that every patch has a bug report upstream)? - How about the openssl-devel dependency now that we are moving to NSS? Is this still allowed? I didn't yet look into how comprehensive the use of openssl is... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:23:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092323.m99NNSRb021366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-09 19:23:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > If you fix this timestamp issue: > APPROVED Fixed. If you want to take a (final) look at the package: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-lite.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default artwork and Configuration for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092323.m99NNL8J021331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-09 19:23:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This package provides /etc/xdg/lxsession/LXDE/default with the following > contents: > > smproxy > xscreensaver -no-splash > openbox --config-file $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/openbox/lxde-rc.xml > lxpanel --profile LXDE > pcmanfm -d > > > Now, smproxy doesn't exist (since you don't require xorg-x11-xsm any more). > xscreensaver doesn't exist either. > openbox refuses to start because there is no /etc/xdg/openbox/lxde-rc.xml > lxpanel also refuses to start, saying the config file doesn't exist. > pcmanfm does seem to start. Yay! :) This is not correct: 1. smproxy no longer is required, because lxsession-lite cannot save sessions (in contrast to lxsession) 2. I don't want to force people to install xscreensaver, because lxde works fine with other screensavers too. People who install LXDE most likely want a stripped down desktop environment, perhaps they want to use xlock or no screensaver at all. /etc/xdg/lxsession/LXDE/default is just a config file that can be easily changed and the changes are preserved during updates. So I really don't see a problem here. 3. in /usr/bin/startlxde XDG_CONFIG_HOME is expanded to "$HOME/.config", so there is no need for /etc/xdg/openbox/lxde-rc.xml 4. startlxde will copy lxde-rc.xml from /usr/share/lxde/openbox/rc.xml to $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/openbox/lxde-rc.xml (= $HOME/.config/openbox/lxde-rc.xml) if it does not exist. 5. Same for lxpanel. What you are seeing is a version mismatch problem because my package has not been touched for a while and the panel config changed to a new format supporting multiple panels in the meantime. > When I choose LXDE at the gdm login prompt, I'm presented with a blank screen > with just the programs I set to start up in my GNOME session (ssh-add, gmpc). > > What am I missing? Try this one, together with the latest lxsession-lite package from bug #442268: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec I have completely removed the icon-theme and use Echo instead. I will package nuoveXT as lxde-icon-theme (noarch) later. Since it is not required any longer by lxsession-lite there is no need to hurry. I have done my very best to make the new package multi-arch compatible. I'm preserving timestamps during install and so on, I hope this is for now (until lxde-settings is splitted out). If anybody wants to review it, feel free. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092341.m99Nf0UY027419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #1 from Uwe Kubosch 2008-10-09 19:40:59 EDT --- I have done a Koji build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092346.m99NkiFl028396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |465897 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 9 23:46:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810092346.m99NkhFn028354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Charles R. Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |437626 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 01:03:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100103.m9A13LHd010058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-09 21:03:20 EDT --- We need a legal review here to check for potential licensing incompatibility and patent issues. Blocking FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 02:15:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] New: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Summary: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer-0-1.20081005cvs.fc10.src.rpm Description: The PDF Renderer is just what the name implies: an open source, all Java library which renders PDF documents to the screen using Java2D. Typically this means drawing into a Swing panel, but it could also draw to other Graphics2D implementations. It could be used to draw on top of PDFs, share them over a network, convert PDFs to PNG images, or maybe even project PDFs into a 3D scene. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Note: rpmlint gives a false warning on the SRPM: pdf-renderer.src:99: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} which can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 02:16:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100216.m9A2Gebx020469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466394 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 02:16:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100216.m9A2GdBY020439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Orcan Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 02:23:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100223.m9A2NdKO025401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lxde-common |Review Request: lxde-common |- Default artwork and |- Default configuration |Configuration for LXDE |files for LXDE --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-09 22:23:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Try this one, together with the latest lxsession-lite package from bug #442268: And please don't forget to wipe ~/.config/lx* ~/.config/openbox/lxde-rc.xml and ~/.config/pcmanfm/main.lxde before you login to LXDE, so you really see the latest changes. TIA! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 02:31:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 22:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100231.m9A2Vd72027409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) | --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-09 22:31:38 EDT --- (The submitter replied to me that currently he has trouble in accessing to internet and will provide a new srpm within 4-5 days) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 03:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100304.m9A34q07030645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #7 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-09 23:04:51 EDT --- Thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #6) > Created an attachment (id=319888) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=319888) [details] > License analysis > > Well, > > * About itext-no-rups.patch: > - Would you explain what "it depends on proprietary com.sun classes" > means? > I am not familiar with Java, however as far as I checked quickly > > * About pdf-renderer.jar: > Is it different from the below? > https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net/ > > https://pdf-renderer.dev.java.net/files/documents/6008/113009/PDFRenderer-2008_10_05-src.zip > It is available under LGPLv2+ > * About dom4j-1.6.1.jar > Fedora has "dom4j" rpm, of which the license says BSD > First I thought the com.sun classes the program depends were internal java classes. But further investigation showed that these are actually pdf-renderer dependencies. I packaged pdf-renderer (Bug #466394) and made it block itext. I also enabled compilation of the rups libraries. Thank you for pointing this out. > * License > - My analysis attached. > The license tag should be > "(LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1) and and ASL2.0 and BSD and MIT" > ( + "+ LGPLv2+ and CC-BY" if you build rups part) > I made it (with rups) : License: (LGPLv2+ or MPLv1.1) and ASL 2.0 and BSD and MIT and LGPLv2+ and CC-BY > * Provides > - For upgrade path and so on, this type of Provides (Provides: iText) > should be full EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific. > This package does not have a specified epoch, so I just changed it to Provides: iText == %{version}-%{release} Is this good enough? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- I fixed everything else you asked. The updated files are: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext-2.1.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Note that you need to build and install bouncycastle bouncycastle-mail from rawhide and pdf-renderer from Bug #466394 to build itext now. There are some warnings while building the debuginfo package but I don't know if those are important. Are those fixable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 03:14:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100314.m9A3E6t0032588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 --- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-09 23:14:05 EDT --- I know that the way I formulate the release number may not be the most ideal one. What is the best way of putting it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 03:32:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100332.m9A3WDRv007477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-09 23:32:11 EDT --- Agreed with the above review, this looks good. A few trivial fixups please, then I approve. You can make these changes at CVS checkin. --- wsmancli.spec 2008-10-09 22:10:07.000000000 -0500 +++ wsmancli.spec.matt 2008-10-09 22:20:55.000000000 -0500 @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@ Name: wsmancli -Version: 2.1.0 +Version: 2.1.0 Release: 1%{dist} License: BSD Url: http://www.openwsman.org/ Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXXX) -Group: System Environment/Daemons -BuildRequires: openwsman-devel pkgconfig curl-devel -Requires: openwsman curl -Summary: Opensource Implementation of WS-Management-Command line Utility +Group: Applications/System +BuildRequires: openwsman-devel >= 2.1.0, pkgconfig curl-devel +Summary: WS-Management Command Line Interface %description -Part of openwsman, an Opensource Implementation of WS-Management +Command line interface for managing systems using the Web Services +Management protocol. %prep %setup -q -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 03:38:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100338.m9A3cYd6008663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-09 23:38:33 EDT --- Thank you for the update. The package is in better shape now. Just figure out what to do with the rules files and the package will be good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:07:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100407.m9A47qbH011063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #9 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-10 00:07:51 EDT --- I've fixed up all issues and created a new release. rmplint now only shows: unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/unbound unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/unbound unbound Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm initscript: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100420.m9A4KPbZ013905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-10 00:20:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872501 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. b4af1ac0c62ec75b8236d1c39cb56c58 hunspell-am_test.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:18:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100418.m9A4IZ7C016623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-10 00:18:33 EDT --- The spec is O.K now. rpmlint only produces 1 warning, about a cosmetic mix of spaces and tabs. +---------------------------------+ | Package APPROVED | +---------------------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:20:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100420.m9A4K3d5017192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-10 00:20:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872498 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 69d4234f5161669a4bef30ce42432643 tk_TM.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:38:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100438.m9A4c5bn017248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-10 00:38:04 EDT --- rpmlint gave me fbterm.i386: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/fbterm root 04755 The file is setuid, this may be dangerous, especially if this file is setuid root. fbterm.i386: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/fbterm 04755 A standard executable should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have a wrong executable permissions in some files included in your package. also, I don't see any need of following in SPEC %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig package failed to build on dist-f10 see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872504 Can you update SRPM with above fixes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 04:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100450.m9A4o0Vc019375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 00:49:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I'll change the release number accordingly. WRT the opengl issue, is it > possible to test using 7.2 of mesa-libGL? Unfortunately I meet with rather serious issue on mesa 7.2 (bug 461460) and so I cannot test this on mesa 7.2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:01:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100701.m9A71P7I013338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 --- Comment #3 from srinivas 2008-10-10 03:01:24 EDT --- Modified the spec file with the suggested changes. Thanks Srinivas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:06:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100706.m9A76RCa016193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 --- Comment #4 from srinivas 2008-10-10 03:06:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wsmancli Short Description:Command line interface for managing systems using the Web Services Management protocol Owners: srini Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:06:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100706.m9A76nZF016357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 06:56:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 02:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100656.m9A6urgj012131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #12 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-10 02:56:52 EDT --- Works better now, but pcmanfm has no icons: http://david.woodhou.se/where-icons.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:13:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100713.m9A7DZnM015163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-10 03:13:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-tk Short Description: Turkmen hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100712.m9A7Ce9I015083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-10 03:12:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ber Short Description: Amazigh hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100718.m9A7I7xI016068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-10 03:18:05 EDT --- Mock scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872700 Passes all review items at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Installs OK as multilib. APPROVED -- once you sort out the lack of icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:29:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458011] Review Request: ms-sys - Create DOS/MS-compatible boot records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100729.m9A7TWaK018221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458011 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-10 03:29:30 EDT --- This package contains verbatim copies of various MBRs and boot records stuffed into arrays in the supposedly GPLed source code. Is that legally acceptable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:30:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100730.m9A7U3WF021087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-10 03:30:02 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:30:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100730.m9A7UGYD021153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100755.m9A7tYCp024452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100756.m9A7uMD7026798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-10 03:56:21 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100755.m9A7tAu6026434@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-10 03:55:09 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 07:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 03:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100756.m9A7ueHo024659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 08:12:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 04:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100812.m9A8COr0031344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #19 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 04:12:23 EDT --- The source tarball timestamp is still different from what I have downloaded: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 229644 Jun 11 20:49 ../SOURCES/lxsession-lite-0.3.6.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 229644 Jun 8 19:13 lxsession-lite-0.3.6.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 09:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466052] Review Request: hunspell-tk - Turkmen hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100903.m9A93ojQ008087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466052 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 09:03:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466051] Review Request: hunspell-ber - Amazigh hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100903.m9A93U63010637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466051 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 09:06:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225721] Merge Review: ekiga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100906.m9A96BE8008949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-10 05:06:10 EDT --- Thanks! Build pushed to rawhide. The opal library that ekiga depends on needs a merge review as well if you have the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 09:45:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:45:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810100945.m9A9jcNq020662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-10 05:45:36 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: d810f98c2b56bb54d89d1a41596d8fbddfdf699c Padre-0.10.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). N/A debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A* %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. BAD* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. BAD is a GUI app, desktop file is missing - rpmlint complains perl-Padre.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Padre/Wx/Ack.pm remove the executable bits perl-Padre.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.pl 0644 perl-Padre.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.t 0644 when /auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/* must be packaged (it is required for Padre to work correctly), then you should package 2 dirs %{perl_vendorlib}/Padre + %{perl_vendorlib}/auto/share/dist/Padre, but not the whole %{perl_vendorlib}/* hierarchy - tests requires running X, so the check section is disabled, but the proper BR: can exist in the spec (commented out) - it is a GUI application, but desktop file is missing - when running Padre in mock/Rawhide I got an error "libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory", window title "Padre::Wx::App Error" - looks like something wants to open development version of this library even when the runtime lib is installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101002.m9AA2FOU024322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 06:02:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Works better now, but pcmanfm has no icons: > http://david.woodhou.se/where-icons.png I guess you don't have echo-icon-theme installed, do you? Do you see icons when you select another icon theme (e.g with lxappearance) and re-login? If the selected icon theme is not installed, lxde-settings falls back to hicolor which does not provide icons for folder and folder_home. IMO the fallback mechanism is sufficient, but of course I can require echo-icon-theme. What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101010.m9AAARgh024302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 06:10:26 EDT --- Not a solution, but I guess that it is a similar issue that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=209592 for thunar. Maybe this should be solved (or not solved) similarly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101014.m9AAEljx024990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 06:14:46 EDT --- Ok, my bad, did not fix that because I thought you were talking about keeping the timestamps during install. But is the timestamp of the source really important? If so, why is it not in the Packaging or the Review Guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:19:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101019.m9AAJ4LA028007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #21 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 06:19:03 EDT --- It is: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:31:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: brickshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101031.m9AAV3VR029301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-10 06:31:01 EDT --- Nothing from upstream. I choose the first way. The package will take some days, but i will do it soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:34:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101034.m9AAYw7x031551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 06:34:57 EDT --- Ok, my fault. I really would like to know when tis was introduced but I can't find that change in the history nor in the old wiki. :( Anyway, here's a new mockbuild: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Note: I did not increase the version nor did a changelog entry, just rebuilt the package with another source. Hope this is ok for you, for me the timestamp is matching now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101048.m9AAmZhC032059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #23 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 06:48:35 EDT --- Perfect. The guideline was added some months ago. I vaguely remember that it was rapidly discussed on the packaging list. But this is something I insist on since quite a long time -- but although I don't think it should be a must in general I also don't see why it shouldn't do be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 10:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101057.m9AAvxiP001498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 06:57:58 EDT --- I completely agree, it's something we should care about. I just didn't know it. :( I guess my problem was kind of sourceforge-specific because I downloaded the file with my webbrowser and got redirected to a mirror. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxsession-lite Short Description: Lightweight X11 session manager Owners: cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:01:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101101.m9AB1Dhh004352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 07:01:12 EDT --- To me there are 2 questions: 1. Do we need to require an icon theme, when it can easily be changed? I guess this is what most people try first when they hit that problem, most people care about 'the desktop stuff' more than you do. ;) 2. And if we require one, which one? Fedora's (Echo) or upstream's (nuoveXT/Rodent). IMO we should use our icons, because it's nearly impossible to remove it. For me uninstalling fedora-icon-theme would result in removing 141 packages including the whole Gnome Desktop, some system-config-* tools, anaconda and firstboot and many others. So I think for a normal desktop user we can assume that there there are icon themes installed and the fallback to hicolor is sufficient until he selects something different. But I don't mind requiring echo for this package. What do you guys think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:01:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:01:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101101.m9AB1ppJ004461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-10 07:01:50 EDT --- Ping, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:03:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101103.m9AB35U0004610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #17 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-10 07:03:05 EDT --- Setting another icon theme does seem to give me an icon for the Downloads folder, but nothing gives me an icon for My Documents unless I install the echo-icon-theme. Sounds like we should require that, at least for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101104.m9AB4p35004810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #25 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 07:04:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > I guess my problem was kind of sourceforge-specific because I downloaded the > file with my webbrowser and got redirected to a mirror. I don't think that it is sourceforge specific since it doesn't seems to me that webbrowser keep timestamps. Using wget there is also a redirection but still the timestamps are kept. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:18:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:18:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101118.m9ABIWX6005978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-10 07:18:31 EDT --- * BuildRequires: python-setuptools is needed, too, or else it complains and starts downloading it from python.org: * I refer to the epydoc generated files in the "doc" directory: $ du -h doc 14M doc And >1M compressed. *If* to be packaged, they must go into a -doc sub-package according to the review guidelines. * That's stuff that can be added in cvs, however, so: APPROVED: python-cssutils-0.9.5.1-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:23:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101123.m9ABNoK6007299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #18 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 07:23:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > to remove it. For me uninstalling fedora-icon-theme would result in removing > 141 packages including the whole Gnome Desktop, some system-config-* tools, libgnome depends on it. Just to throw in my own experience, as a lightweight desktop guy since quite long, for me it is not that hard to remove fedora-icon-theme. Currently I have only pidgin and firefox that are removed, but these are application I find particularly unsuited for my uses, too much bloated and with much too pretty and heavy gui. However I haven't found lightweight replacements so I still use them (in fact for pidgin I know there are replacements, but I haven't have time to learn them). But I think that in the long time, and for lxde users it should be a goal not to have anything from the gnome stack in a default install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:29:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101129.m9ABTOep010450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #10 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-10 07:29:23 EDT --- This example and test should have permission 644 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.pl /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.pl Desktop file wasn't included in upstream source. Should I create it or file a bug to upstream? The error "libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so:..." wasn't resolved by upstream till now, but he's working on solution. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre-0.10-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:39:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101139.m9ABduUZ010215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-10 07:39:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > This example and test should have permission 644 > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.pl > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/auto/share/dist/Padre/templates/template.pl ok > > Desktop file wasn't included in upstream source. Should I create it or file a > bug to upstream? please create one - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > The error "libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so:..." wasn't resolved by upstream till now, > but he's working on solution. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101145.m9ABjPVV013512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 07:45:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I have no idea what's going wrong for you. It works reliable for me and others, > on the other hand I see no obviuos error in your setup. It works now. At least the lxde desktop works. However, my attemp to use fluwbox instead of the lxde desktop didn't worked, when I choose the session corresponding with the setup explained above, I also get the lxde desktop... > Do you see the icons in the logout dialog? There should be icons since the new > version now includes a copy of them, but some people reported missing icons. > Looks like a problem with gtk-update-icon-cache. No problem here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:55:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101155.m9ABtnX6016175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 11:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101156.m9ABudxd014322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #19 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 07:56:38 EDT --- 2 things that doesn't work for me: * double clicking on th etrash gives 'command not found' * the third icon from the left on the bar, between pcmanfm and firefox doesn't seem to work. And in the configuration application it seems to be blank -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:03:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101203.m9AC3X5s018358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-10 08:03:33 EDT --- All this is now fixed in 0.9.5.1-3 which is in the same location in case you want to have a quick look just in case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:06:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101206.m9AC60RQ017369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-10 08:06:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cssutils Short Description: CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python Owners: thias Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101219.m9ACJm58022486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #14 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-10 08:19:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > * The original elisa-common split was fine, IMO. No need to duplicate > files. And no need to add a virtual elisa-devel. We have tools in > non-devel packages that are BuildRequires. elisa-common can be BR, > too. Indeed. What about using the "elisa-base" name instead of common or devel? I just thought of it, as those files are indeed common to the runtime and the build of elisa, but not to be required by anything else, only build required. So the name "elisa-base" seems better suited, since those files are the basic elisa files. Sounds good? > * The %description could explain briefly what "good set of plugins" > means and why it matters. I'll update to : This package contains the good set of plugins for the Elisa Media Center, plugins which are considered stable and do not present any licensing issues. > * 0.5.13 is available. > > Packaging-wise this is fine. Could be imported and developed further > in cvs until the deps are ready, too. I'm assuming you mean the main "elisa" package. Seems like a good idea, I'll do that. Thanks for all your comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101237.m9ACb6J8026607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #7 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-10 08:37:05 EDT --- few notes - you can use "svn export" instead of "svn checkout" (or a even script like http://fedora.danny.cz/fedora-getsvn), the source archive will be smaller, but when you are using upstream released snapshots, use them - the EVRs in Obsoletes/Provides are inconsistent between main package and -server subpackage and I don't think that the main package should contain Obsol/Prov for vnc-server - better use --with-os-name="Fedora" in xserver's %configure (instead of "Fedora 11") - replace /etc with %{_sysconfdir}, /etc/rc.d/init.d with %{_initddir} in %build and %install sections - don't add X-Red-Hat-Extra into desktop file, fix the file directly instead of using command line options, use fedora as vendor, missing BR: desktop-file-utils - more about desktop files at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438609] Review Request: elisa-plugins-bad - Bad Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101244.m9ACiP0p027735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438609 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-10 08:44:23 EDT --- Since only elisa plugins requires pigment, I'll go ahead and update both pigment and pigment-python in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 12:57:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101257.m9ACva8I030690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #12 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-10 08:57:35 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre-0.10-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:20:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461425] Review Request: daap-sharp - DAAP client library for Mono In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101320.m9ADKfug001586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461425 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ianburrell at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-10-10 09:20:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:22:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101322.m9ADMYfR003932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #20 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 09:22:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Setting another icon theme does seem to give me an icon for the Downloads > folder, but nothing gives me an icon for My Documents unless I install the > echo-icon-theme. Sounds like we should require that, at least for now. This is strange because pcmanfm uses generic names that are provided by many icon themes. For me here on F9 it works Echo, Gnome, Fedora, Mist, Rodent and all icon themes that provide the icon. Folders change initially, the change of My Documents requires to re-login however. (In reply to comment #18) > But I think that in the long time, and for lxde users it should be a goal > not to have anything from the gnome stack in a default install. Fully agreed, but as long as we have dependency chains like firstboot -> metacity we still have lots of gnome stuff around by default. But the icon set and the gtk theme are not gnome-specific, so I have no problems with them. (In reply to comment #19) > 2 things that doesn't work for me: > > * double clicking on th etrash gives 'command not found' What trash? There is no trash on the LX desktop. > * the third icon from the left on the bar, between pcmanfm and firefox > doesn't seem to work. This is because you don't have lxterminal installed. Will be pulled in via comps, I don't want to require it for it is only a launcher that can be configured with a two clicks. > And in the configuration application it seems to be blank Which configuration app? lxappearance or lxpanel -C? Can you provide a screenshot? New Package: (also took care of the timestamp of Source0) http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm I require fedora-icon-theme now. It's just a few symlinks and makes sure that the default icon theme for each release (Echo, Mist...) is installed. I also realized that I need to require fedora-logos because it provides start-here.png. So IMO all icon problems are fixed now. Everybody agrees? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:36:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101336.m9ADaAYr004704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 09:36:08 EDT --- Some comments: * About versioning - Some maintaners use (and I recomment): 0-0.X.%{?dist} * native2ascii - build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------- 30 + find . -name '*.java' -exec native2ascii '{}' '{}' ';' 31 find: `native2ascii' 32 : Permission denied 33 find: `native2ascii' 34 : Permission denied 35 find: `native2ascii' .... ------------------------------------------------- Can these messages be ignored? * Font .pfb - Would you check how these fonts file (binaries) are used? * If these files can be removed, please remove these. * If these files are really used, please replace these with fonts which are system-widely provided. These fonts are all in urw-fonts (i.e. BR: urw-fonts is needed if these fonts are needed). BaseFonts.properties also needs fixing in this case. And as (rpm says) urw-fonts are under GPL+, the license tag of this package should be changed to "LGPLv2+ and GPL+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:40:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101340.m9ADeNJc007754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-10 09:40:22 EDT --- I've contacted upstream. Gromacs 4 can read the files made with gromacs 3, thus eliminating the need for a separate package for gromacs 3. Also, now that Gromacs 4 is out there won't be any more updates for Gromacs 3. Closing request, since the package gromacs does everything that is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101342.m9ADg0SK005919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #47 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-10 09:41:58 EDT --- I've contacted upstream. Gromacs 4 can read files made with Gromacs 3, so there are no reasons to have two packages - the newest version available is enough. I closed the gromacs3 review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:49:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437574] Review Request: ruby-pg - A Ruby interface for the PostgreSQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101349.m9ADn3aQ007138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437574 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 09:49:01 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on RPMS: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [limb at fawkes SPECS]$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/i386/ruby-pg-* ruby-pg.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.7.9.2008.02.05 0.7.9.2008.02.05-1.fc9 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. ruby-pg.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided ruby-postgres If a package is obsoleted by a compatible replacement, the obsoleted package must also be provided in order to provide clean upgrade paths and not cause unnecessary dependency breakage. If the obsoleting package is not a compatible replacement for the old one, leave out the provides. Fix both. Though indicated to by under the Ruby license, in the spec and on the site, it includes a few copies of the GPL. Why is this? It's not a blocker, just odd. Per Ruby guidelines: ---- Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 Ruby packages must require ruby at build time with a BuildRequires: ruby, and may indicate the minimal ruby version they need for building. ---- - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig Fix, or explain why this wouldn't be necessary. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. Are the .h files in ext/ not useful for this purpose? Otherwise, no other blockers on full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437560] Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101355.m9ADtY3s009205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437560 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 09:55:32 EDT --- In Fedora since fc8, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437559] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101355.m9ADtaSI009235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437559 Bug 437559 depends on bug 437560, which changed state. Bug 437560 Summary: Review Request: clustermon - cluster monitor component of conga https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437560 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 13:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437559] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101356.m9ADu8nS009482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437559 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 09:56:06 EDT --- Already in Fedora since fc8, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101406.m9AE66D1012161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #21 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 10:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > > * double clicking on th etrash gives 'command not found' > > What trash? There is no trash on the LX desktop. There is one on mine :-). Though I don't know where it comes from. > > * the third icon from the left on the bar, between pcmanfm and firefox > > doesn't seem to work. > > This is because you don't have lxterminal installed. Will be pulled in via > comps, I don't want to require it for it is only a launcher that can be > configured with a two clicks. > > > And in the configuration application it seems to be blank > Which configuration app? lxappearance or lxpanel -C? Can you provide a > screenshot? If you tell me how... > New Package: (also took care of the timestamp of Source0) > http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common.spec > http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxde-common-0.3.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm > > I require fedora-icon-theme now. It's just a few symlinks and makes sure that > the default icon theme for each release (Echo, Mist...) is installed. > I also realized that I need to require fedora-logos because it provides > start-here.png. > > So IMO all icon problems are fixed now. Everybody agrees? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101406.m9AE69Ja012224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|debarshi.ray at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:10:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101410.m9AEAvsZ015133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101440.m9AEeBZi019263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 10:40:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > > > * double clicking on th etrash gives 'command not found' > > > > What trash? There is no trash on the LX desktop. > > There is one on mine :-). Though I don't know where it comes from. Me ether, it's definitely not LXDE, because pcmanfm has no trash. Can you see the trash in 'ls ~/Desktop'? Perhaps it's a desktop file? > > Which configuration app? lxappearance or lxpanel -C? Can you provide a > > screenshot? > > If you tell me how... With import from ImageMagic for example: whole desktop: import -window root screenshot.jpg single window: import -frame screenshot.jpg (cursor will change, then click the window you want) > > So IMO all icon problems are fixed now. Everybody agrees? > > Yes. Ok then: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxde-comon Short Description: Default configuration files for LXDE Owners: cwickert Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:40:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101440.m9AEeRHd020889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101441.m9AEf8nm021119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 10:41:06 EDT --- What's comment #3 about? Anyway. . . rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on RPMS: ebhttpd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ebnetd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are: root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator, games, gopher, ftp, nobody. ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are: root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news, uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users. ndtpd.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. These are all fine, see above. Otherwise, everything looks great, my only other concern after a full review is the Conflicts: for ebhttpd. Will users expect this to be on port 80 by default, period, full stop, or would it be feasible to set it to use something else by default, or recommend that to users? It'd be as simple as modifying the xinetd file. My preference would be to leave it as is, drop the Conflicts:, but add a ebnetd-README.fedora indicating the port 80 issues and resolutions, so that if someone wants to use this on a machine with an existing httpd/tux/whatever, then they have that option and won't be stopped by the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:40:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437574] Review Request: ruby-pg - A Ruby interface for the PostgreSQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101440.m9AEeoaP019536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437574 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101442.m9AEgPQ4021352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 10:42:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > * Provides > > - For upgrade path and so on, this type of Provides (Provides: iText) > > should be full EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific. > > > This package does not have a specified epoch, so I just changed it to > Provides: iText == %{version}-%{release} > Is this good enough? - Yes. > There are some warnings while building the debuginfo package but I don't know > if those are important. Are those fixable? - Well, I don't know what aot-compile-rpm is doing exactly, so I don't know how to suppress these warnings for now... Then: * License - Please add the following files to %doc ------------------------------------------------------------- rups/com/lowagie/rups/view/icons/copyright_notice.txt (CC-BY) ------------------------------------------------------------- * native2ascii - mock build shows: ------------------------------------------------------------- 2991 DEBUG: + find src/rtf/com/lowagie/text/rtf/parser/destinations/ -name '*.java' -exec native2ascii '{}' '{}' ';' 2992 DEBUG: find: `native2ascii': Permission denied 2993 DEBUG: find: `native2ascii': Permission denied 2994 DEBUG: find: `native2ascii': Permission denied 2995 DEBUG: find: 2996 DEBUG: `native2ascii': Permission denied ------------------------------------------------------------- Can these messages be ignored? Other things seem okay, so I think I can approve this package once pdf-renderer is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101458.m9AEwfDu023314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-10 10:58:40 EDT --- Thanks for your reply! I will look at your points soon and, maybe, fix them / comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 14:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101459.m9AExTbr023567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Michel Alexandre Salim 2008-10-10 10:59:27 EDT --- ReviewTemplate MUST ? rpmlint: OK -- errors are irrelevant ? package name: OK ? spec file name: OK ? package guideline-compliant: OK ? license complies with guidelines: OK ? license field accurate: OK ? license file not deleted: OK ? spec in US English: OK ? spec legible: OK ? source matches upstream: OK ? builds under >= 1 archs, others excluded: OK. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=873117 *** NOTE *** Might want to add a comment on top of the %ExclusiveArch line. Since the mono stack is incomplete on many platforms, no need to create a bug report for this ? build dependencies complete: OK ? own all directories: OK ? no dupes in %files: OK ? permission: OK ? %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT: OK ? macros used consistently: OK ? Package contains code: OK ? large docs => -doc: OK ? doc not runtime dependent: OK ? headers in -devel: OK ? if contains *.pc, req pkgconfig: OK ? devel requires versioned base package: OK ? clean buildroot before install: OK ? filenames UTF-8: OK SHOULD ? package build in mock on all architectures: OK (as far as Mono stack allows) ? package functioned as described: OK ? scriplets are sane: OK ? other subpackages should require versioned base: OK ? require package not files: OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:20:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101520.m9AFKN4W027816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:16:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101516.m9AFGN8k027035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 --- Comment #19 from Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal 2008-10-10 11:16:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: notify-sharp Short Description: A C# implementeation for Desktop Notifications Owners: sindrepb Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101517.m9AFHJcF028430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Sindre Pedersen Bj??rdal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101525.m9AFPJpa030645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 11:25:18 EDT --- For -3: (In reply to comment #6) > A few more questions: > > - It seems to me that pkg-config --cflags globalplatform should not just return > "-pthread -I/usr/include/PCSC" but something like "-pthread > -I/usr/include/GlobalPlatform -I/usr/include/PCSC" right? So maybe > includedir=@includedir@ > should become: > includedir=@includedir@/GlobalPlatform > instead? - Oh, I overlooked this point. The correct one is --------------------------------------------------------------- Cflags: -I${includedir}/GlobalPlatform --------------------------------------------------------------- > - Does it make sense to submit the inclusion of the pkgconfig file upstream (as > the requirement that every patch has a bug report upstream)? - I think shipping pkgconfig file in the tarball is preferable (for this package) and I would appreciate it if you submit to upstream. > - How about the openssl-devel dependency now that we are moving to NSS? Is this > still allowed? - I think if openssl is to be removed from Fedora there will be such an announce. Then: * Dependency for -devel subpackage - Every package which contains pkgconfig .pc file should have "Requires: pkgconfig" so please add this to -devel subpackage. And I will wait for your another review request submit or your pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101535.m9AFZxAK031282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 11:35:57 EDT --- Build error: + mkdir -p /var/tmp/TrustedQSL-1.11-1.fc9-root-limb/usr/share/applications + mkdir -p /var/tmp/TrustedQSL-1.11-1.fc9-root-limb/usr/share/pixmaps + cp icons/key48.png /var/tmp/TrustedQSL-1.11-1.fc9-root-limb/usr/share/pixmaps/TrustedQSL.png + sed -i -e s/.png//g tqsl.desktop + sed -i -e s/.png//g tqslcert.desktop + desktop-file-install --vendor=fedora --dir=/var/tmp/TrustedQSL-1.11-1.fc9-root-limb/usr/share/applications /home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/tqsl.desktop Error on file "/home/limb/rpmbuild/BUILD/tqsl.desktop": No such file or directory error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.32062 (%install) If you drop the %{builddir} it works. Also, you need to BuildRequire desktop-file-utils and expat-devel. rpmlint is clean on everything. Since upstream uses lowercase some places in their naming and uppercase in others, from what I see, it might be better to make this package's name all lowercase. Your call. Comment on status of your patches WRT upstream. If submitted upstream, indicate this in the spec. If not, do so, and indicate in the spec. Add ChangeLog, INSTALL and the help/ dir to %doc. Otherwise, full review looks good. I'm doing another mock build, I'll post back with any further BR issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] New: Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Summary: Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jortel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/suds/tags/release-0.3.1/python-suds.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/suds/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/python-suds-0.3.1-1.src.rpm?format=raw Description: I would appreciate a review to get Suds into Fedora Extras! Suds is a Fedora hosted project that provides a python soap web services client lib. It leverages python meta programming to provide an intuative API for consuming web services. Objectification of types defined in the WSDL is provided without class generation. Programmers rarely need to read the WSDL since services and WSDL based objects can be easily inspected. Suds presents an XML-RPC-like API for service invocation. It supports all three major soap binding styles: rpc/literal, rpc/encoded and document/literal. This package provides a reliable, complete and easy to use alternative to ZSI and SoapPy. Although only at version 0.3.1, suds is mature, actively maintained and has a solid community around the world. For more details - visit the Trac site: https://fedorahosted.org/suds. I am a first time package maintainer and will need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 15:57:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:57:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101557.m9AFvrTK003104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 11:57:52 EDT --- No more BR issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101602.m9AG2F5L004154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 12:02:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > * Macros > > > > - %distname is not defined. > > > %distname replaced by %{distribution} > > > > - My system does not define %distribution macro. Koji seems to > > define it, however its value (string) is "Unknown" so > > this is still wrong. > > Just use "--vendor=fedora". > Hmmm. What about this > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > recommendation to opposite do NOT using names like Fedora o Redhat in spec??? - This item says that naming a document as "README.fedora" or so should be avoided, however I oppose to it because there are many Fedora specific packaging issue... Also this item says that "Of course this doesn't cover internal details like spec file conditionals like %fedora or %rhel." So please use --vendor=fedora. ! Note Currently not a few maintainers simply remove "--vendor=foo" when using desktop-file-install. If you remove this completely I don't oppose to it > And lso in this dociment I get macros %{distribution}... - But actually on my system %distribution is not defined and koji (Fedora build server) sets this as "Unknown"... * Category of desktop file - As you create the base desktop file by yourself, you can simply add ------------------------------------------------ Category=Video; ------------------------------------------------ line between "%{__cat} > %{name}.desktop << EOF" and EOF lines, then remove "--add-category=Video" ! Note - Semicolon is needed at the last. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:26:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101626.m9AGQppS009319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 12:26:49 EDT --- rpmlint on srpm clean. rpmlint on rpms: libgdither-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Anything to put here? License, naming, macros, scripts, all good. Full review is very clean. No BR issues evident after a mock build. Other than the one minor bit above, we're ready to rock and/or roll. I'll use my copies to start reviewing gavl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:34:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101634.m9AGYN2c011336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-10 12:34:22 EDT --- upon reflection, you won't need a conf file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ if the calls to dlopen() are made to take a fully specified path, which can be determined at compile time if so desired. In this way, private libraries won't ever be seen by other applications that shouldn't see them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:55:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:55:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101655.m9AGtWQv015488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-10 12:55:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocspd Short Description: OpenCA OCSP Daemon Owners: monnerat Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:56:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101656.m9AGuH8K015702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 12:56:16 EDT --- rpmlint: not even crickets. You have ldconfig in %post and %postun, do you not need them for -devel as well? COPYING is GPLv3. Code all says GPLv2+. Web site doesn't really specify. ?? Needs clarification. Using a patched bundled library, which is documented. OK. Looks great otherwise, full review very nearly done. Just need libgdither to be in rawhide so I can mock-test the BuildRequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 16:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101653.m9AGrdTe013839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #10 from Orion Poplawski 2008-10-10 12:53:37 EDT --- I've merged in your changes with mine that I've had to make while testing/running 2.6.0p1. http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda-2.6.0p2-2.fc9.src.rpm * Fri Oct 10 2008 Orion Poplawski 2.6.0p2-2 - Drop duplicated libamglue.so from -devel - Update -pie patch - Fix Source typo - Move xinetd to main package - used by both client and server - Move %{_libexecdir}/amanda/amanda-sh-lib.sh to main package - LIBEXECDIR is used in xinetd template - Make calcsize setuid root I'm starting to work with upstream to get a workable version of the pie patch merged upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101720.m9AHKdWv021425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-10 13:20:37 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:21:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101721.m9AHLBG5020340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-10 13:21:08 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:21:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi-tools - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101721.m9AHLpoe020518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Jeffrey C. Ollie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: dahdi - |Review Request: dahdi-tools |Userspace tools to |- Userspace tools to |configure the DAHDI kernel |configure the DAHDI kernel |modules |modules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251071] Review Request: StatelessServer - Server for Stateless Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101722.m9AHM6VA021941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251071 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(law at redhat.com) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-10 13:22:03 EDT --- No response; closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101740.m9AHeEWq024611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 13:40:13 EDT --- Jason, You are closing the review request only one week after you commented on this bug at the last time, which is too fast. The review guideline says we should - wait for response at least one month - then wait _another_ one week i.e. 5 weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:44:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101744.m9AHifeU026838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-10 13:44:41 EDT --- Hmm, you're right; I was confused about who the original submitter was. It would still be nice to get something which actually builds, though; otherwise this will just end up being closed again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:50:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101750.m9AHoPWT028437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |465641 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 17:57:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:57:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101757.m9AHvlnL030160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 13:57:45 EDT --- Well, * BuildRequires - Actually without "BuildRequires: python-setuptools" This package won't build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=872720 * python_sitelib vs python_sitearch - Then after adding "BuildRequires: python-setuptools" this time build fails on x86_64. If python modules to be installed are arch-dependent, they must be installed under sitearch directory, not sitelib: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture Note that on i386/ppc sitelib directory is the same as sitearch directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:07:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101807.m9AI7jof000334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #27 from rob 2008-10-10 14:07:44 EDT --- I'll do a new spin for rawhide sometime soon- I'm a bit overwhelmed at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101827.m9AIRIi0002790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #6 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-10 14:27:17 EDT --- I see what happened. Python attempts to grab setuptools over the internet if needed. So it is a dependency; I just didn't have the rpm installed for it. I switched to sitearch, too. Can you give me any information about how you ran the linked test build? It'd be nice to do a more rigorous test like that myself instead of repeatedly posting a bad srpm. SRPM: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:45:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101845.m9AIj0dc008444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 14:44:58 EDT --- I will check your srpm later (I want to go to bed now). Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ (In reply to comment #6) > Can you give me any information about how you ran the linked test build? It'd > be nice to do a more rigorous test like that myself instead of repeatedly > posting a bad srpm. After you get sponsored you can do test build using koji. It may be that even before you get sponsored you can do this, however I am not sure. At least you have to create your account on Fedora account system and setup koji build client, however I am not sure if it is sufficient. Anyway now I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:50:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101850.m9AIoukZ007874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-10 14:50:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > * Macros > > > > > - %distname is not defined. > > > > %distname replaced by %{distribution} > > > > > > - My system does not define %distribution macro. Koji seems to > > > define it, however its value (string) is "Unknown" so > > > this is still wrong. > > > Just use "--vendor=fedora". > > Hmmm. What about this > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > > recommendation to opposite do NOT using names like Fedora o Redhat in spec??? > > - This item says that naming a document as "README.fedora" or so > should be avoided, This document says what this names should be compleatly avoided when possible. File name is just example. > however I oppose to it because there are many > Fedora specific packaging issue... So, if you oppose, I think you should discuss about it with FESCO... > Also this item says that "Of course this doesn't cover internal > details like spec file conditionals like %fedora or %rhel." > So please use --vendor=fedora. Conditionals is conditionals, it is exactly for that, so, failing "%if %fedora" or similar is not fatal in any case even more so if it will be non Fedora build... > ! Note > Currently not a few maintainers simply remove "--vendor=foo" > when using desktop-file-install. If you remove this completely > I don't oppose to it Ok, I do that. I think it is best way now. > * Category of desktop file > - As you create the base desktop file by yourself, you can simply > add > ------------------------------------------------ > Category=Video; > ------------------------------------------------ > line between "%{__cat} > %{name}.desktop << EOF" > and EOF lines, then remove "--add-category=Video" > ! Note > - Semicolon is needed at the last. Ok, I'm do how you say. Is there any differences where Category mentioned? And I tryed this, but got error: /var/tmp/DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9-root-pasha//usr/share/applications/DivFix++.desktop: error: file contains key "Category" in group "Desktop Entry", but keys extending the format should start with "X-" Error on file "DivFix++.desktop": Failed to validate the created desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 18:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101857.m9AIvinc011688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 14:57:42 EDT --- rpmlint clean on SRPM. on RPMS: frei0r-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Fix, if applicable. Mightn't we want to call frei0r-devel frei0r-plugins-devel, since the base pacakge is frei0r-plugins? License is good, but I hope gavl turns out to be GPLv2. What's the status of the patches WRT upstream? Do we not need ldconfig in the post/postun for the main package? Otherwise looks good, waiting on libgdither and gavl for a mock build to test BRs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 19:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101922.m9AJMAa7014503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-10 15:22:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) First of all: > > > Hmmm. What about this > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat - This is packaging tricks (as the title says) and not guidelines. > So, if you oppose, I think you should discuss about it with FESCO... - So no need. On the contrary, see this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage ---------------------------------------------------------------- If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as ---------------------------------------------------------------- But as I said before not a few maintainers simply removes --vendor=foo. > > * Category of desktop file > > - As you create the base desktop file by yourself, you can simply > > add > > ------------------------------------------------ > > Category=Video; > > ------------------------------------------------ > > line between "%{__cat} > %{name}.desktop << EOF" > > and EOF lines, then remove "--add-category=Video" > > ! Note > > - Semicolon is needed at the last. > Ok, I'm do how you say. > Is there any differences where Category mentioned? > > And I tryed this, but got error: > /var/tmp/DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9-root-pasha//usr/share/applications/DivFix++.desktop: > error: file contains key "Category" in group "Desktop Entry", but keys > extending the format should start with "X-" > Error on file "DivFix++.desktop": Failed to validate the created desktop file - Because the correct one is "Categories=Video;", sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 19:42:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101942.m9AJgLlM018896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-10 15:42:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > If you drop the %{builddir} it works. fixed > Also, you need to BuildRequire desktop-file-utils and expat-devel. fixed > Since upstream uses lowercase some places in their naming and uppercase in > others, from what I see, it might be better to make this package's name all > lowercase. Your call. lowered the name > Comment on status of your patches WRT upstream. If submitted upstream, > indicate this in the spec. If not, do so, and indicate in the spec. fixed > Add ChangeLog, INSTALL and the help/ dir to %doc. Added ChangeLog and help/*, INSTALL is only required for people that want to compile this from source. also add detection for zlib, expat on x86_64 arch (koji failed to build those) .. and bumped version to: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/trustedqsl.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 19:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810101945.m9AJjjN9019623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 15:45:44 EDT --- Please follow the process described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle and in particular make sure you have a page describing your font on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:In-progress_fonts by the time you post your review request. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:00:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102000.m9AK0WhJ023189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-10 16:00:31 EDT --- Looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:01:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102001.m9AK1Xgu023471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-10 16:01:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > First of all: > > > > Hmmm. What about this > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat > - This is packaging tricks (as the title says) and not guidelines. > > > So, if you oppose, I think you should discuss about it with FESCO... > - So no need. > > On the contrary, see this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > If upstream uses , leave it intact, otherwise use fedora as > Very intresting. Is there trics do not follow official guidelines???? > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > But as I said before not a few maintainers simply removes --vendor=foo. Ok, ok, I think it is a best way. I already done it now. > - Because the correct one is "Categories=Video;", sorry... This works. But yoa are not answer to: > > Is there any differences where Category mentioned? http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/DivFix++/DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:04:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102004.m9AK4rAu025817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-10 16:04:51 EDT --- Drop an 'o' from losing, line 11. Otherwise, looks great. APPROVED. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:08:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244314] Review Request: matchbox-window-manager - Matchbox window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102008.m9AK8EKC024759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244314 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-10 16:08:12 EDT --- Closing... is in rawhide... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:13:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:13:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102013.m9AKDkOM025600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-10 16:13:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-browse Short Description: The sugar browse activity Owners: erikos Branches: F-9 InitialCC: mpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:31:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102031.m9AKV4eD029663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-10 16:31:03 EDT --- https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=712784&aid=2158091&group_id=128809 filed with upstream about the library placement. Until upstream fixes, it's acceptable to leave them in %{_libdir}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102037.m9AKbGIR000931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 --- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-10 16:37:15 EDT --- Thank you, * I made the release number 0-0.X.%{?dist} * There are only a few files that have encoding issues and those are getting fixed properly. Hence the native2ascii warnings can be ignored. * .pfb files are removed. But since they are needed by the program I hacked the code to use the system-fonts. Now urw-fonts is Required and the license is "LGPLv2+ and GPL+". The final version of files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer-0-0.2.20081005cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102051.m9AKpOx6002113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 16:51:21 EDT --- Thanks. Now that the legal part is done, I've updated the proposed package with the latest upstream version http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/heuristica-fonts-20080825-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:00:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102100.m9AL0fsC006470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 17:00:40 EDT --- Ok, forget about it. I see you pushed them to stable today. Sorry for the noise ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102057.m9AKviYs005894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-10 16:57:42 EDT --- I don't think one is supposed to be both the reviewer and the modifier in a fedora merge ticket :(. Now that I've done the review part someone else needs to apply it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 20:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102058.m9AKwfww006060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 16:58:40 EDT --- Fabian, I see you have build weplab for F8 and F9, but I don't see it in the repos. Have you made updates in the update system at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102108.m9AL8j48004994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #9 from Orcan Ogetbil 2008-10-10 17:08:44 EDT --- * Added that copyright notice file * Those messages can be ignored since the files that need to get fixed are getting fixed as far as the encoding is concerned. The updated files are: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/itext-2.1.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:16:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102116.m9ALGv5r006462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 17:16:55 EDT --- I can't see why you don't use the initial Makefile. Something along make CC="%__cc" CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LIBS="-lcrpyto" chntpw cpnt reged And use simple cp or install to install the resulting executables. Using cmake while upstream doesn't seems too much to me. openssl in requires is not useful, it is automatically found by rpm. It is better to avoid using Fedora whenever possible, so please rename README.Fedora to something more neutral like README.Dist cp should be cp -p to keep timestamp. Also I suggest using %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* to catch any kind of compression. I am afraid that, if accepted, you'll need contact legal (through spot, he is the contact) because of the crypto and export stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102144.m9ALi0XE013621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:46:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102146.m9ALkvdc012106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:45:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102145.m9ALjk8q011957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102153.m9ALrBb6013250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(t.sailer at alumni.e | |thz.ch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 21:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102154.m9ALsrKq015279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 22:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102218.m9AMIcuv017903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-10 18:18:37 EDT --- The license issue is unfortunately a blocker. Another comment is that, in my opinion, it is better in general to have make variables passed as make arguments and not as shell env variables (though both work with gnu make), like: make install DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" INSTALL="install -p" Not a blocker. Otherwise I haven't seen anything obviously wrong by glancing at the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:06:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102306.m9AN6eT0026476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:06:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:08:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102308.m9AN8IbG026637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:08:17 EDT --- cvs done. (I assume you mean 'lxde-common' not 'lxde-comon' :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:12:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102312.m9ANCTQI027430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:12:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:19:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102319.m9ANJdTJ028407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |GROMACS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102320.m9ANKdIk028992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |tcl-mysqltcl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102320.m9ANKjoT029026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |ario -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465897] Review Request: Judy - General purpose dynamic array library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102320.m9ANKCtY028790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465897 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |Judy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102319.m9ANJD3e028331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |perl-SVN-Notify -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:20:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102320.m9ANK2Cv028736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |ltsp-server-livesetu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:20:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102320.m9ANKIVq028913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mpg at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:20:17 EDT --- Please remember to assign the review to the reviewer and move it from NEW to ASSIGNED. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102319.m9ANJMab030408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |perl-Text-Trac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:19:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102319.m9ANJnnp030468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |symbolic -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463211] Review Request: notify-sharp - A C# implementation for Desktop Notifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102327.m9ANRGCO030071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463211 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:27:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 10 23:39:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 19:39:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207793] Review Request: flite - Small, fast speech synthesis engine (text-to-speech) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810102339.m9ANd8Yi032074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207793 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-10 19:39:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110004.m9B04g8Q005105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-10 20:04:41 EDT --- > I can't see why you don't use the initial Makefile. The initial Makefile seemed horribly broken enough to warrant replacement (-m32 among other things!). If it builds using correct Fedora flags with make like you suggest I don't see any problem using the original Makefile though. > openssl in requires is not useful, it is automatically found by rpm. Ok. > It is better to avoid using Fedora whenever possible, so please rename > README.Fedora to something more neutral like README.Dist > cp should be cp -p to keep timestamp. > Also I suggest using %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* to catch any kind of > compression. Ok. > I am afraid that, if accepted, you'll need contact legal (through spot, > he is the contact) because of the crypto and export stuff. I'll contact him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:12:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110012.m9B0Cru3005407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-10 20:12:52 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:15:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110015.m9B0FiTJ007038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-10 20:15:43 EDT --- New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/chntpw.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/chntpw-0.99.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110013.m9B0DAUC006534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-10 20:13:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:22:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110022.m9B0MpD8008204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-10 20:22:50 EDT --- lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 00:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110024.m9B0OkZC008344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-10 20:24:45 EDT --- lxde-common-0.3.2.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-common-0.3.2.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 01:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110100.m9B10Iau012976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-10 21:00:17 EDT --- Has also been submitted for F9, but bodhi swallowed the notification. (In reply to comment #26) > At least the lxde desktop works. However, my attemp to > use fluwbox instead of the lxde desktop didn't worked, when I > choose the session corresponding with the setup explained above, I also > get the lxde desktop... I will look into that tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 02:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110200.m9B20jxe021812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 04:59:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 00:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110459.m9B4xQPP021269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Alex Lancaster 2008-10-11 00:59:24 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pypop New Branches: EL-5 Owners: alexlan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 06:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110659.m9B6xNGS009725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-11 02:59:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trustedqsl Short Description: TrustedQSL ham-radio applications Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 07:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110725.m9B7PTep014124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-11 03:25:28 EDT --- Okay. Now one issue and one question * License - Since you completely removed .pfb files from tarball, the license can be simply "LGPLv2+". ? XXXX.length in BaseFonts.properties - One question is that BaseFonts.properties contains lines like the following: ------------------------------------------------------------------ Courier-Bold.length=120373 ------------------------------------------------------------------ However on my system n022004l.pfb has 101592 bytes. Can these difference of size be ignored? If not (i.e. size should also be fixed), the following sample scripts may be useful. ------------------------------------------------------------------ #!/bin/sh INPUT=BaseFonts.properties OUTPUT=BaseFonts.properties.1 FONTDIR=/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1 rm -f $OUTPUT cat $INPUT | while read line do newline=$line if echo $newline | grep -q 'file=.*pfb' then pfbname=$(echo $newline | sed -e 's|^.*file=||') newline=$(echo $newline | sed -e "s|file=|file=${FONTDIR}/|") elif echo $newline | grep -q 'length=' then size=$(ls -al ${FONTDIR}/$pfbname | awk '{print $5}') newline=$(echo $newline | sed -e "s|length=.*|length=$size|") fi echo $newline >> $OUTPUT done ------------------------------------------------------------------- (When size needs fixing and you use this script, "BuildRequires: urw-fonts" is needed to examine the size of the installed fonts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 07:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110727.m9B7RGIP014274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-11 03:27:14 EDT --- Okay. Now I wait for bug 466394 side. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 07:58:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110758.m9B7wvWE019869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-11 03:58:56 EDT --- And this is built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 08:08:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:08:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110808.m9B88APs022003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 08:17:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:17:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110817.m9B8HJ2e025122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-11 04:17:18 EDT --- - I didn't think about the font sizes. I am not sure whether they are important, but for the sake of completeness I used your script to rewrite the BaseFonts.properties file, just in case... Thank you for the script. - The license is set back to LGPLv2+. - Files updated: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/pdf-renderer-0-0.3.20081005cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 08:52:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110852.m9B8q4dm031942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #4 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-11 04:52:03 EDT --- The files cannot be found? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 09:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110900.m9B90YN1002488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-11 05:00:33 EDT --- Try it again now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 08:58:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 04:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110858.m9B8w2JX001650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-11 04:58:01 EDT --- Interesting. skvidal moved fedorapeople to a different machine earlier today, perhaps that had something to do with it. I'll try to upload them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 09:29:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110929.m9B9T6iq008098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-11 05:29:05 EDT --- I'd prefer if the chntpw-README.Fedora was also renamed. The main aim of not having 'Fedora' is to be reused, so it shouldn't be anywhere: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks The -p for keeping timestamps is notfor newly created executables, since their timestamp is the one of the build anyway, but for the files that may have their timestamps kept, here the man page and README file. Just a suggestion, staticaly compiled executable should be kept, they don't do harm (and could even be used in-source), even though they are not of use in fedora. I also suggest a comment in the spec file telling where the version comes from since the source archive has another version string. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 09:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110939.m9B9dQei009782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-11 05:39:25 EDT --- New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/chntpw.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/chntpw-0.99.6-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 09:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110957.m9B9vxrx013667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 09:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810110957.m9B9vwcY013629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Depends on| |460887 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 10:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111012.m9BACcLr015716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-11 06:12:37 EDT --- rpmlint says: chntpw.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/chntpw-0.99.6/WinReg.txt I think that this should be fixed. Otherwise everything seems ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 10:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 06:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111052.m9BAqhuV025644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bugs.michael at gmx.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(christian at whoop.o | |rg) --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-11 06:52:41 EDT --- > %define prefix /usr Please give the rationale for making this package relocatable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Note that in your case it is a mistake: pcapnav-config isn't relocatable. > $ rpmlint libpcapnav-0.8-1.src.rpm > libpcapnav.src:18: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Christian Don't set "Packager". Your name appears in the %changelog. Setting the Packager tag should only be done in your local build-system for binary rpms *you* have built. Publishing src.rpms with a default Packager tag bears the risk that other people build and publish bad binary rpms with your name in the package header. > libpcapnav.src:20: W: hardcoded-prefix-tag %{prefix} See top of review. > libpcapnav.src:47: W: configure-without-libdir-spec Prefer the %configure macro where it works. Run "rpm --eval %configure" to see what it does. It also defines libdir as necessary. > libpcapnav.src:82: W: macro-in-%changelog prefix Avoid macros in %changelog. Some cause damage when they expand. You can escape them with a double %% as in %%prefix. > libpcapnav.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog It's preferred if you hardcode the package version-release at the right of every changelog entry. Like: * Tue Sep 02 2008 Christian Kreibich - 0.8-1 - Fix /usr/lib/ file list. > $ rpmlint libpcapnav-devel-0.8-1.i386.rpm > libpcapnav-devel.i386: W: no-documentation This can be ignored. > libpcapnav-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin > /usr/lib/libpcapnav.so.0.0.0 > libpcapnav-devel.i386: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun > /usr/lib/libpcapnav.so.0.0.0 These errors are only because your %files section is wrong. The *.so.* files belong into the main package, not the -devel pkg. > libpcapnav-devel.i386: W: no-version-dependency-on libpcapnav/libpcapnav-libs/liblibpcapnav 0.8 Most -devel packages must Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} so main pkg and -devel pkg are kept in sync for any changes. > libpcapnav-devel.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Development > and documentation files for libpcapnav. Most times "Summary" is not a full sentence. It's preferred to not end it with a dot. > $ rpmlint libpcapnav-0.8-1.i386.rpm > libpcapnav.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libpcapnav-0.8/NEWS > libpcapnav.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpcap See comment on -devel pkg. This must be versioned. > %define version 0.8 Just do Version: 0.8 instead of redefining %version earlier. > Release: 1 Using the %{dist} macro is not mandatory, but may be helpful if using exactly the same src.rpm for several Fedora releases. -> Release: 1%{?dist} > # Using FTP to get around SourceForge's habit of adding something after .tar.gz > Source: ftp://ftp.sf.net/pub/sourceforge/netdude/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz There are recommendations on working http links somewhere in the Fedora Packaging Wiki. > Requires: libpcap Delete this. There is an automatic dependency on the libpcap SONAME added by rpmbuild. We rely on these dependencies. Query the libpcapnav package to see. > %description devel > Static libraries, header files and documentation > for libpcapnav We don't build and include static libs unless there is very good reason to do that. Libtool archives (*.la) should be deleted, too. > %build Build log contains many format string type warnings, e.g. using %u for long int. > if [ "$SMP" != "" ]; then There is %{?_smp_mflags} that can simply be appended to "make". > make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{prefix} install Use: make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install Can the tests be run in the %check section of the spec? Should they pass? $ ./run-tests.sh Running test 1 ... FAILED. > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README > %{prefix}/lib/lib*.so.* This would break on 64-bit multiarch platforms where there is /usr/lib64 (and /usr/lib for 32-bit libs). Hence use: %{_libdir}/*.so.* > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc %{prefix}/share/gtk-doc/html/pcapnav This is empty and only adds empty directories to the pkg. > %{prefix}/lib/libpcapnav* %_libdir and include only the *.so symlink here: %{_libdir}/*.so > %{prefix}/include/pcapnav.h %_includedir > %{prefix}/bin/pcapnav-config %_bindir > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pcapnav > drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pcapnav/images > $ pcapnav-config --cflags --libs > -I/usr/include > -L/usr/lib -lpcapnav -lpcap The -I and -L here are bad as they alter the search order. Can you make it not override default search paths with default search paths? Hope this catches all packaging issues. But only an updated src.rpm will tell. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 11:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111100.m9BB0muj027580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #52 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-11 07:00:46 EDT --- The (post*) Requires for /sbin/ldconfig are still missing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 11:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111123.m9BBNL2h032536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cooly at gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cooly at gnome.eu.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 11:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 07:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466033] sugar-browse -- Browse activity for sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111148.m9BBmxXS003245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466033 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 12:01:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111201.m9BC1kO0006362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-11 08:01:45 EDT --- Review: OK source files match upstream : 2968c36b9ecf3d98fc1f2c1c9c0d9341 httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK summary is OK. OK description is OK. OK dist tag is present. OK build root OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. license text not included upstream. OK BuildRequires are proper. N/A compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). OK package installs properly. OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires are sane: httperf = 0.9.0-1.fc10 httperf(x86-64) = 0.9.0-1.fc10 = libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libnsl.so.1()(64bit) libresolv.so.2()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. N/A owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no static libraries. OK no libtool .la files. N/A not GUI application. Suggestion: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 12:12:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111212.m9BCChUE008537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-11 08:12:42 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'd prefer adding a document how to change the port too. updated srpm and spec file is: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 12:42:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 08:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111242.m9BCgXL1015515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-11 08:42:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: eventlog New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: peter silfreed Note: I asked current eventlog maintainer, Douglas E. Warner, about EPEL-branches, and he hasn't any objections. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 13:13:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111313.m9BDDL9H021464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 13:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111325.m9BDPI8G024733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #10 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-11 09:25:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320093) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320093) Patch to fix g_thread_init crash issue Peter, do you have a F-10 system to test this ? I've upgraded my system to F-10, and the GThread init crash still exist for all 3 utilities here. That's working on F-10 for you ? Maybe I'm seeing a different glib behavior because my system is dual-core, I don't know. I'm attaching the patch required for it to work on my system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 13:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111333.m9BDXJB1026104@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 09:33:17 EDT --- Yes, I've tested it on F-10 on both i386 (netbook) and x86_64 (VM) and wasn't seeing any crash when running on F-10. The VM is setup with 2 cores, and the netbook while not real dual core is hyperthreaded. I'll test it later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 13:54:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111354.m9BDssS8029819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-11 09:54:53 EDT --- Matthias, I was wondering if you could shed some light on this. Peter and I are seeing a different runtime behavior of these gupnp tools. On my f10-system, the uv tools immediately abort because g_thread_init() is called twice. If I run the tool from the debugger, the gupnp tool explicitly calls gtk_init(), then g_thread_init() right below. On my system, gtk_init() also calls g_thread_init() (through atk_bridge_init(), bonobo_activation_init() and corba orb init()), hence the abort. Any insights ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 13:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111358.m9BDwcF8030715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-11 09:58:37 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pdf-renderer) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111401.m9BE1AvL031530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-11 10:01:08 EDT --- One misc issue ----------------------------------------------------------- itext.i386: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/itext-2.1.3/copyright_notice.txt ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please fix the window's-like end-of-line encoding of this file. "sed -i -e 's|\r||' " or "dos2unix (this case BR: dos2unix is needed) will fix this. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (itext) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246046] gtksourceview2 - GtkSourceView v2.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111411.m9BEBE21000795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246046 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:11:11 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227109] Review Request: pmd-3.6-1jpp - Scans Java source code and looks for potential problems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111415.m9BEFNvG032648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227109 Bug 227109 depends on bug 227068, which changed state. Bug 227068 Summary: Review Request: jaxen-1.1-0.b7.4jpp - An XPath engine written in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227068 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:14:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227069] Review Request: jaxen-bootstrap-1.1-0.b7.3jpp - A convenience package for build of dom4j In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111414.m9BEEPpv032137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227069 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:14:23 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227068] Review Request: jaxen-1.1-0.b7.4jpp - An XPath engine written in Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111415.m9BEFMn9032611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227068 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:15:20 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227079] Review Request: maven2-common-poms-1.0-3jpp - Common poms for maven2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111413.m9BEDJ2X000983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227079 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:13:17 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:18:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 227046] Review Request: classpathx-jaxp-1.0-0.beta1.10jpp - Java XML parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111418.m9BEIQQp000436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227046 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:18:24 EDT --- Closing - was completed and in distro but now is marked as dead package in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 396721] Review Request: ps3pf-utils - Utilities for Sony PlayStation 3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111440.m9BEe3l5004333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) | --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:40:02 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:36:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111436.m9BEa7JQ003609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #13 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-11 10:36:06 EDT --- >From the API docs: g_thread_init() might only be called once. On the second call it will abort with an error. If you want to make sure that the thread system is initialized, you can do this: if (!g_thread_supported ()) g_thread_init (NULL); So either change your call to g_thread_init() to check whether threads are already supported, or run g_thread_init() before anything else (and if it still crashes, file a bug against whatever is not checking for g_thread_supported() before calling g_thread_init). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 396731] Review Request: powerpc-utils - Utilities for PowerPC platforms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111438.m9BEct2f003875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396731 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) | --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:38:53 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:39:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 396741] Review Request: powerpc-utils-papr - Utilities for PAPR platforms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111439.m9BEdTlb005154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=396741 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(dwmw2 at infradead.o | |rg) | --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:39:27 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 248431] Review Request: perl-Net-FTPServer - Secure, extensible and configurable Perl FTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111441.m9BEf8nP004764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248431 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #27 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:41:05 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111447.m9BElkqO005857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-11 10:47:45 EDT --- Please avoid using fedora in the file name: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Avoiding_using_fedora_or_redhat -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111451.m9BEpZ7K007845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-11 10:51:33 EDT --- Closing - in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 14:51:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111451.m9BEpOsP006706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-11 10:51:23 EDT --- Okay. (In reply to comment #9) > > - Because the correct one is "Categories=Video;", sorry... > This works. > But yoa are not answer to: > > > Is there any differences where Category mentioned? - I guess if desktop-file-{install,validate} won't complain the place of Categories is of no importance. One misc issue #make %{?_smp_mflags} WXCONFIG=wx-config - Please use %% (instead of %) in comments or %changelog to prevent macros from being expanded. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (DivFix++) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 15:00:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:00:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111500.m9BF0V9R009758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-11 11:00:30 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: f7b1c07c0c82593684540c12d2a68471d527d0eb MooseX-Types-0.04.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: noarch, perl module [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. additional bonus: "make test" passes ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 15:08:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:08:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111508.m9BF8iqM010185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|194054 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 15:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194054] Review Request: monodoc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111508.m9BF8h3X010127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194054 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr Blocks|178904 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 15:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111515.m9BFFLgN011693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-11 11:15:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > - I guess if desktop-file-{install,validate} won't complain > the place of Categories is of no importance. Ok. I thought as much. But I was disappointed by your recommendation to move it from desktop-file-install command option into desktop file itself. > One misc issue > #make %{?_smp_mflags} WXCONFIG=wx-config > - Please use %% (instead of %) in comments or %changelog to prevent > macros from being expanded. Ok, my carelessness. But in this case it is have absolutely no sense. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: DivFix++ Short Description: A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file Owners: hubbitus Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 15:30:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111530.m9BFU0fV014304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 --- Comment #8 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-11 11:29:58 EDT --- Is it a strict blocker to not have license headers at the top of every file given that they do have copyright assignments and the tarball contains the COPYRIGHT file? I've already worked with upstream and they agreed to put these in, but until they make a release with these changes, can this review request be approved? I have the other change done already (icon file) but just haven't uploaded it yet. Let me know and I'll upload the other changes. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 16:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 12:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111610.m9BGAWQh023237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #14 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-11 12:10:31 EDT --- > So either change your call to g_thread_init() to check whether > threads are already supported. Yes I read the API doc as well, and that's exactly what the patch I attached does. What I don't understand is why gtk_init() calls g_thread_init() on my system and not on Peter's system... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 17:42:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111742.m9BHgbqj005132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 17:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 13:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111742.m9BHgawC005106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-11 13:42:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-Types Short Description: Organise your Moose types in libraries Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 19:16:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111916.m9BJGMIq022209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pdf-renderer Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-11 15:16:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdf-renderer Short Description: A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer Owners: oget Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 19:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111914.m9BJENPE021613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-11 15:14:22 EDT --- Oops, forgot to check the rpmlint in the last build. All fixed now. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: itext Short Description: A Free Java-PDF library Owners: oget Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 19:16:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:16:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810111916.m9BJGcOl022305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |itext -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 20:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810112042.m9BKgxZf002844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-11 16:42:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - file /usr/bin/starplot from install of starlab-4.4.3-1.fc8.i386 conflicts > with file from package starplot-0.95.5-1.fc8.i386 I renamed it to tstarplot (as opposed to xstarplot, which is X11-based displayer) SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/starlab.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/starlab-4.4.3-3.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 20:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810112051.m9BKpbSS004523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Marek Mahut 2008-10-11 16:51:36 EDT --- Thanks, you rock. approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 23:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810112303.m9BN3pDm027086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-11 19:03:50 EDT --- The package is in pretty good shape. I have a few requests: * Make the .desktop file richer. Begin the Name: and GenericName: parts with capital letters. GenericName should be something different then %{name}; it needs to be descriptive. Also afaik you should put a --remove-category="Application" flag to desktop-file-install (or remove that entry manually from %{SOURCE1}) Please check out these guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files * If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. When you click on the "Help" icon on the main window you get this error: help file not found: /usr/share/doc/printoxx/userguide-en.html This needs fixed. * Other than this I couldn't manage to print anything other than blank pages with this software. Does it work on you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 23:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810112308.m9BN8BJp028002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 11 23:12:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810112312.m9BNCUxQ028921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Thomas Moschny 2008-10-11 19:12:29 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: httperf Short Description: Tool for measuring web server performance Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 02:42:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120242.m9C2gIFJ032304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #28 from rob 2008-10-11 22:42:17 EDT --- http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-1.fc10/eclipse-anyedit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 02:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] New: Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 Summary: Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/dnstracer/dnstracer.spec SRPM URL: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/dnstracer/dnstracer-1.9-1.src.rpm Description: dnstracer determines where a given Domain Name Server (DNS) gets its information from, and follows the chain of DNS servers back to the servers which know the data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 02:53:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120253.m9C2rpom001698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #8 from David Timms 2008-10-11 22:53:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks! But I need to correct myself here. > %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps > %{__mv} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/icono_rakarrack_$dim.png \ > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/$dim/apps/rakarrack.png > > would be better. None of the existing icons I saw in hicolors/$dim/apps/ are > named as application.$dim.png . They are all named as application.png . Let's > keep the thing as they are. Yes, reading freedesktop .desktop spec says that preferably the icon should be just name, and the app can then choose either an svg, or most appropriate size png. Giving this a go. > You can overwrite the existing .desktop file with %Source1 after "make install" > so there won't be an ambiguity. I think the final .desktop file in the RPM > should be named rakarrack.desktop (not rakarrack-fedora.desktop , this would be > unusual!). Actually, the typical names from what I can see are fedora-rakarrack.desktop. This seems to be based on the vendor tag. The vendor item has been removed from the desktop-file-install command. > In the spec file, avoid using %macros directly inside comments and changelogs. > e.g. this is WRONG: I'll keep an eye out for my attempted quick comments ;-) > I recommend using the %{name} macro instead of hardcoding the name of the > application into the spec file; i.e. in this case replacing the occurrences of > rakarrack * with %{name} is the preferred way. Same thing applies for the > %{version} macro. Done. OK. Finally got the sed and echo mods to the desktop file to work correctly: Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec New .src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Sun Oct 12 2008 David Timms - 0.2.0-3 - don't exclude the original .desktop file * Mon Oct 06 2008 David Timms - 0.2.0-2 - mod icon names to be appname.png to fit with fallback desktop spec - replace rakarrack with name macro - mod .desktop via sed and cat, rather than additional Source file - add .desktop extra categories using the desktop-file-install utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 03:10:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120310.m9C3AD3T005418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-11 23:10:11 EDT --- Will Close this as NOTABUG by this Thursday if updates are not submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 03:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120317.m9C3H5Tq006743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #9 from David Timms 2008-10-11 23:17:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > implies that you can add/remove categories. Did I miss something? The original PlanetCCRMA spec included: # desktop file categories BASE="X-Fedora Application AudioVideo" XTRA="X-Digital_Processing X-Jack" %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ `for c in ${BASE} ${XTRA} ; do echo "--add-category $c " ; done` \ %{SOURCE1} see also: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2008-October/msg00096.html >From what you mention, it is OK to add extra categories; I was under the impression that only the categories mentioned on freedesktop are considered OK ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 04:11:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120411.m9C4B3Cn015748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #10 from David Timms 2008-10-12 00:11:02 EDT --- License has been confirmed as GPLv2. https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=2323002&forum_id=778861 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 04:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466649] New: Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 Summary: Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/adeona.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/adeona-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Adeona is a stolen laptop location program rpm lint returns 0 errors: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./adeona.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/ke4qqq/rpmbuild/SRPMS/adeona-0.2.1-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 04:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120420.m9C4KowI017141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bdpepple at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bdpepple at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Brian Pepple 2008-10-12 00:20:49 EDT --- MD5Sum: 590c152cde2d62fef422f9f773560e95 darkice-0.19.tar.gz Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * Buildroot has all required elements * All paths begin with macros * Make succeeds even when %{_smp_mflags} is defined * Files have appropriate permissions and owners * Rpmlint produces only the following warning, which can be safely ignored: darkice.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/darkice.cfg * Package installs and uninstalls cleanly Bad: * License should be GPLv2+, which you can fix when you import the package into CVS. +1 APPROVED, and I'll also be you sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 04:47:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120447.m9C4lD8g020606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 00:47:12 EDT --- New URLs: Spec: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/chntpw.spec SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/chntpw-0.99.6-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 04:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466649] Review Request: adeona-0.2.1 - Stolen Laptop Tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120448.m9C4mLpk020678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466649 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2008-10-12 00:48:20 EDT --- taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 06:17:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120617.m9C6HN6a003120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-12 02:17:21 EDT --- Thanks. Still there are some issues *: needs fixed . ?: doesn't need fixed but my preference is different than yours. Take it or don't. * rakarrack.desktop -> %{name}.desktop ? %{name} is a basic rack of effects for guitar... -> Rakarrack is a basic rack of effects for guitar... because this is a Description. Unless the application's name is strictly beginning with a non-capital letter, I would refer to it capital-lettered in sections like Summary or Description. * This line needs to be in the %prep section: %configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} --htmldir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} * These lines need to be in the %prep section too: %{__sed} -i 's/Icon=icono_rakarrack_128x128/Icon=rakarrack/' %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop %{__sed} -i 's/Guitar Effects Processor/Real-time audio effects processing rack for guitar/' %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop echo "GenericName=Digital audio effects processor" >> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop echo "Version=1.0" >> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop You may need to change the "%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/" to "data/" Basically, the %build section is for building/compiling, %install section is to install the software into %{buildroot}. Everything else that can be done before coming to these sections must be done in %prep. * %doc AUTHORS README %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/COPYING %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html This has problems. Now there are two document directories created: /usr/share/doc/rakarrack /usr/share/doc/rakarrack-0.2.0 You only need one document directory. COPYING and html needs to go into %doc (which is /usr/share/doc/rakarrack-0.2.0). What you have to do is to make the program point onto the correct document directory when you click on the Help->contents button. You may need to hack the code (with some patch) to achieve this or most likely (and hopefully) it will be enough just to pass certain parameters to the configure script. Look at the output of "./configure --help" to see what parameters you may use. ------ So you decided to not add a new category? I'd say that would be convenient for people dealing with audio software. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 06:23:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120623.m9C6NkW4003909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-12 02:23:45 EDT --- Actually, the last thing in the previous message that I wrote was: * This line needs to be in the %prep section: %configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} --htmldir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} These may be the right parameters to pass to the configure script. You may need to check it out. Sorry I forgot to edit my last paragraph accordingly. (Still %configure needs to go into %prep.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 06:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 02:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120656.m9C6u5af008624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-12 02:56:04 EDT --- OK, this is probably what you need to do (regarding the docs) ... %prep ... sed -i 's|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}"|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}-%{version}"|' configure %configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} --htmldir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} ... %files %doc AUTHORS README html COPYING ... It should be something like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:00:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120700.m9C700FW008917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Warren Togami 2008-10-12 02:59:59 EDT --- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines I took a look at the spec file. Did you even read the Fedora packaging guidelines? A few suggestions: * Start from scratch using a .spec template from /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate*.spec from the rpmdevtools package. * The source tarball, include a version number within the tarball name. Generally like name-version.tar.bz2. * Do not include a Packager tag. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros Replace path names like /etc and /usr/share with macros from this page. You should also want to run rpmlint on both the .src.rpm and .noarch.rpm. Correct everything that it complains about. [warren at newcaprica tmp]$ rpmlint ltsp-server-livesetupdocs-0.1-0.src.rpm ltsp-server-livesetupdocs.src:10: W: hardcoded-packager-tag peter at scheie.homedns.org ltsp-server-livesetupdocs.src: W: no-%build-section ltsp-server-livesetupdocs.src: E: no-changelogname-tag ltsp-server-livesetupdocs.src: W: invalid-license GPL ltsp-server-livesetupdocs.src: W: no-url-tag 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Assigning package review to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:03:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120703.m9C73rdQ009670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #75 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:03:51 EDT --- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120705.m9C75q81010009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ismael at olea.org) --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:05:49 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:07:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120707.m9C77xuk010437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:07:57 EDT --- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:06:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:06:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120706.m9C76tP7010201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #50 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:06:52 EDT --- I will close this bug again if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEk. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:10:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453519] Review Request: UnihanDb - The Unihan character database in 5NF In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120710.m9C7AZpF010755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453519 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:10:33 EDT --- Now closing, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120713.m9C7DRbG011258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:13:26 EDT --- Please submit requests on bodhi to push packages to repositories: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120715.m9C7FJeW011515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 03:15:18 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120721.m9C7L40P012461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-12 03:21:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: starlab Short Description: A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics Owners: lkundrak Branches: EL-5 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 07:49:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120749.m9C7nEL7016482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-12 03:49:13 EDT --- Thanks. updated. Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ebnetd/ebnetd-1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 08:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 04:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120851.m9C8p5OX031637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-12 04:51:04 EDT --- Tested using F10 beta running: pymol-1.1-5.20080912svn3419.fc10.x86_64 mesa-libGL-7.2-0.7.fc10.x86_64 python-2.5.2-1.fc10.x86_64 nVidia Corporation GeForce 8600 GT (rev a1) (using the nv driver) no problems on startup, loaded a PDB file and ran a few checks, seemed OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:18:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120918.m9C9IuOq003975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #25 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 05:18:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320137) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320137) screenshot with empty text for terminal in the bar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:23:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120923.m9C9NveZ004639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #26 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 05:23:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > (In reply to comment #20) > > > > > > * double clicking on th etrash gives 'command not found' > > > > > > What trash? There is no trash on the LX desktop. > > > > There is one on mine :-). Though I don't know where it comes from. > > Me ether, it's definitely not LXDE, because pcmanfm has no trash. Can you see > the trash in 'ls ~/Desktop'? Perhaps it's a desktop file? Indeed it is ~/Desktop/trash.desktop Since in fluxbox I don't see my Desktop, I don't know when it appeared. I guess that in the long term lxde should take that trash into account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:32:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120932.m9C9WquU006608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 05:32:51 EDT --- * rpmlint is silent * follow guidelines * free software, license included * match upstream: 09addfe7ae469677da39ed66d83858d3 chntpw-source-080526.zip * %files section right Just one suggestion, I think it is better to use sed for the end of line, and to keep timestamp, like: sed -e 's/\r$//' WinReg.txt > WinReg.txt.eol touch -c -r WinReg.txt WinReg.txt.eol mv WinReg.txt.eol WinReg.txt This is only asuggestion, so APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] New: Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Summary: Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/libfplll.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/libfplll-3.0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fpLLL-3.0 contains several algorithms on lattices that rely on floating-point computations. This includes implementations of the floating-point LLL reduction algorithm, offering different speed/guarantees ratios. It contains a 'wrapper' choosing the estimated best sequence of variants in order to provide a guaranteed output as fast as possible. In the case of the wrapper, the succession of variants is oblivious to the user. It also includes a rigorous floating-point implementation of the Kannan-Fincke-Pohst algorithm that finds a shortest non-zero lattice vector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120944.m9C9iPfu008567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 05:44:25 EDT --- Builds in koji [0]; rpmlint is silent. [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=875176 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 09:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810120949.m9C9n5nT008853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 05:49:04 EDT --- Your suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks much for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chntpw Short Description: Change passwords in Windows SAM files Owners: konradm Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 10:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121013.m9CAD7wV013731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 06:13:05 EDT --- Upstream changed a lot, now it is a C program and there is a separate deco-archive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 10:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458180] Review Request: mailutils - Collection of GNU mail-related utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121019.m9CAJWJc014775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458180 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 06:19:30 EDT --- The conditionals are not used correctly. It should be along bcond_with ltdl and then in the configure invocation conditionals should be used. Also it seems to me that these should be mostly bcond_without since in the default case you want these features to be used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 10:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] New: Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Summary: Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/VisualBoyAdvance.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/VisualBoyAdvance-1.7.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: VisualBoyAdvance is a Nintendo (TM) Gameboy and GameboyAdvance emulator with debugging capabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 10:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 06:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121056.m9CAuIPO021326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 06:56:18 EDT --- Oops, doesn't build in koji [0], but rpmlint is silent. The configure script doesn't recognize ppc64-redhat? [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=875185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 11:17:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] New: Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Summary: Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/sympy.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympy-0.6.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: SymPy aims to become a full-featured computer algebra system (CAS) while keeping the code as simple as possible in order to be comprehensible and easily extensible. SymPy is written entirely in Python and does not require any external libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 11:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121133.m9CBXS0O027524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-12 07:33:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > screenshot with empty text for terminal in the bar Although this is not very user friendly it is the expected behavior ATM. :( (In reply to comment #26) > Indeed it is > ~/Desktop/trash.desktop Ok, and what is the command specified in this file? > Since in fluxbox I don't see my Desktop, I don't know when it appeared. > I guess that in the long term lxde should take that trash into account. When has this file been created? I guess it has been around on your desktop for a while but you did not see it because fluxbox does not support desktop files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 11:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121140.m9CBenUu028937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #20 from Lev Shamardin 2008-10-12 07:40:47 EDT --- Release of protobuf-2.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Spec URL: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec Changes: * Sun Oct 12 2008 Lev Shamardin - 2.0.2-1 - Update to version 2.0.2 - New -java and -javadoc subpackages. - Options to disable building of -python and -java* subpackages Additional comments: - This release adds possibility to disable building of python and java* subpackages, but they are enabled by default. - Java subpackages are built with maven2 according to Fedora packaging guidelines. - Original java sources depend on easymock for the tests which is not yet packaged for Fedora, so I had to remove all self testing stuff from java, but eventually it should be placed back. Any volunteers to package easymock for Fedora? - Requires java-devel >= 1.6.0 to build. Waiting for the formal review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 11:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121157.m9CBvFnb032704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 07:57:14 EDT --- Are you sure this software won't be against Fedora's emulator policy? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/SoftwareTypes#Emulators Also, from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games : But generally, if it requires ROM files, image files, or a copy of the machines BIOS/firmware to work, we won't package it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:05:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121205.m9CC5YrH002591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #29 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 08:05:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320139) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320139) trash file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:04:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121204.m9CC4tNa001852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #28 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 08:04:54 EDT --- Here are the associated times: Access: 2008-10-12 14:03:06.000000000 +0200 Modify: 2007-06-15 19:30:01.000000000 +0200 Change: 2007-06-15 19:30:01.000000000 +0200 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121201.m9CC1v58001352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Mads Villadsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |maxx at krakoa.dk --- Comment #3 from Mads Villadsen 2008-10-12 08:01:57 EDT --- It seems more like something that belongs in the RPMFusion project at rpmfusion.org (where I think gnuboy is already packaged). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121216.m9CCG5Fl005209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #30 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-12 08:16:04 EDT --- So this file has been there for quite a while and belongs to KDE because of the "OnlyShowIn=KDE". Unfortunately pcmanfm does not honor OnlyShowIn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:59:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121259.m9CCxxsk015181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #55 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-12 08:59:57 EDT --- Patrice Dumas, I add this, if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121257.m9CCvhSm014765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #53 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-12 08:57:42 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:57:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121257.m9CCvIZG014673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #10 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-12 08:57:16 EDT --- Hi, and thx for reviewing Update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/printoxx.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/printoxx-1.6-3.fc9.src.rpm I've updated the desktopfile, and I'm using --remove-category="Application". I'm now using doc install from makefile. I don't know if I must keep it, or use DOCDIR={_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} as a make parameter. Now help is displayed when I click on "help" button. As I don't have a printer, I tried with cups-pdf, and I worked. Rpmlint is silent and rebuild under mock is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:57:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121257.m9CCvmGG014458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-12 08:57:48 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 12:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 08:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121257.m9CCvB2k014332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 08:57:09 EDT --- Thank you for continuing to work on this. Anyway: 1. please use lowercase-only package names 2. please add a fontconfig file to each font so it's sorted in the right category 3. please use more descriptive package descriptions so users actually know what they're downloading 4. please make sure the fontconfig scriptlets are actually included in every package Here is a rough draft on how it should be done (I really should be reviewing other font packages instead of rewriting individual package submissions) http://nim.fedorapeople.org/un-extra-fonts.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc10.src.rpm It still needs: 1. proofing and completing of the package descriptions. 2. checking each font is assigned to the correct fontconfig generic family 3. checking the 66 priority is all right (with japanese people at least I think) Some of the changes are probably interesting for un-core as well. Please make all of those changes so I can move to the formal review step. Also the previous remarks on having upstream take a position on GPLv3 / adding font exception / providing sfd sources still stand though we should probably not block on them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 13:19:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121319.m9CDJA09019547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #56 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 09:19:09 EDT --- It is not 'if I want', it is a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 13:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121337.m9CDbG6s023336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #29 from rob 2008-10-12 09:37:14 EDT --- here is one that actually works properly on rawhide, in addition to building properly on rawhide: http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-2.fc10/eclipse-anyedit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 13:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121344.m9CDiKRY024971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-12 09:44:19 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/apt-mirror-0.4.5/apt-mirror.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/apt-mirror-0.4.5/apt-mirror-0.4.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 13:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 09:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121358.m9CDwlRW028148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at w3sp.de Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-12 09:58:46 EDT --- Package Name: apt-mirror Short Description: APT sources mirroring tool Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 14:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121436.m9CEalEa003755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 14:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121437.m9CEbcoY003689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-12 10:37:37 EDT --- Simon, if possible, please consider maintaining EPEL branches, too. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 14:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 10:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121441.m9CEfwGQ004736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457492] Review Request: procbench - Multiplatform information tool and CPU benchmark for x86 procs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121514.m9CFEjk9010731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457492 Adel Gadllah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Adel Gadllah 2008-10-12 11:14:44 EDT --- Package imported and built so closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:27:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121527.m9CFRJfF013504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #32 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 11:27:18 EDT --- Also note that the conf.d/conf.avail changes depend on the discussion of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_spec_template_correction_(fontconfig) which is not an official Fedora guideline yet (and may change during review) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121532.m9CFWs5h014546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-12 11:32:53 EDT --- Package Name: apt-mirror Short Description: APT sources mirroring tool Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459925] Review Request: libowfat - Reimplementation of libdjb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121535.m9CFZdRj015167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459925 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:35:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459926] Review Request: swing-worker - Long running Swing GUI interacting tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121535.m9CFZxOE015227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459926 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:36:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121536.m9CFaH0S015382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:36:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461408] Review Request: laf-widget - Support and base set of additional behaviour and widgets in java look-and-feels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121536.m9CFaRcS015421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461408 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:36:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461418] Review Request: appframework - Swing Application Framework API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121536.m9CFat0J015441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461418 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461822] Review Request: gnu-trove - High performance collections for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121537.m9CFb7xu015484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461822 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121535.m9CFZqPS015301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 11:35:50 EDT --- Well, * Desktop Categories - The Categories "Application" "X-Fedora" are now deprecated and should be removed. (To remove "Application", you can add "--remove-category=Application" option to desktop-file-utils) * Timestamps - Please consider to use --------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on files to be installed as much as possible. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. ! Other things are okay - license correct (GPLv3+) - builds successfully, build log good - spec description good - can be installed - _seems_ to work --------------------------------------------------------- This package (insight) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:36:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461411] Review Request: jhlabs-filters - Java Image Filters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121536.m9CFaj2Z015540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461411 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:42:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121542.m9CFgZgs016623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-12 11:42:34 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:BSD [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: b8c60b281c0eb309acd1b1551c51cccb951685c7 /tmp/dnstracer-1.9.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64, Centos4/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: devel/x86_64, Centos4/i386 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. ================ *** APPROVED *** ================ If possible, please consider maintaining this package for EPEL, too. TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121555.m9CFt1gV018909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ray Van Dolson 2008-10-12 11:55:00 EDT --- Thanks wolfy for the speedy review (and whoops on the initial goof when I filed this thing). New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnstracer Short Description: Trace a DNS record to its start of authority Owners: rayvd Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 EL-4 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 15:55:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 11:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121555.m9CFttNk019517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(rbhalera at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 11:55:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I am little unsure about what to substitute for faces. The families are > generically serif for all the fonts in this package. You basically need to tell fontconfig in the Gentium package "if something asks for Gentium Basic, use Gentium if it's not available" and the reverse in the other package. Plus tell fontconfig it's a serif package. Like I wrote that's the same magic we do for dejavu full and dejavu lgc, just look at their fontconfig files and copy the dejavu full to dejavu lgc rules (replacing with gentium and gentium basic) Don't bother about F-8, it's better to have a good devel package and worry afterwards of previous distros. At this rate F-8 will be EOL-ed before you have any package in the distro :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:07:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:07:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443238] Review Request: cave9 - 3d clone of SFCave. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121607.m9CG77UV022212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443238 --- Comment #11 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-12 12:07:05 EDT --- Victor, any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:15:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459535] Review Request: backup-manager - A command line backup tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121615.m9CGFXm4024622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459535 --- Comment #7 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2008-10-12 12:15:31 EDT --- I have add a daily cron and an option in backup-manager.conf. Put BM_DAILY_CRON to true for active daily cron. -------------------------------------- spec: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SPECS/backup-manager.spec rpm: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc9/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc9.noarch.rpm src: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/SRPMS/fc9/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc9.src.rpm -------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- Other RPMS : FC6: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc6/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc6.noarch.rpm FC8: http://www.llaumgui.com/public/rpm/RPMS/fc8/noarch/backup-manager-0.7.7-3.fc8.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121620.m9CGKlA7025963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #15 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-12 12:20:46 EDT --- Is there anything which is keeping us from closing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121622.m9CGMDex026384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:22:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > --unofficial review-- Thank you for the nice unofficial review Ankur, I'll take up from there. Michal: The spec is an almost perfect copy from official guidelines, that makes it easy to review, thanks Blocking remarks 1. unless upstream has confirmed 1.0 is the actual font revision, and it will version further updates, please use 20020502 as version ? check the version 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) ? add some fontconfig rules 3. unless you *know* upstream is going to release new fonts in the same archive, there is no need to prepare for subpackaging. Upstream is just as likely to publish separate archives, which will mean separate packages (see the gfs fonts for examples). If upstream does end up adding new fonts to this very archive, you can always go the obsolete route ? drop the "just in case" subpackaging Non blocking remarks 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:28:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121628.m9CGSTbA027133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |oldstandard-fonts - Old |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:40:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121640.m9CGeqNG030315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:40:51 EDT --- Also: 1. please rebuild from sfd sources since they're available. Very basic examples are in the inconsolata package, more complete makefiles in dejavu or liberation 2. please rename the font in the process as upstream does not want us to use the same font name if we rebuild the fonts (just a sed on the sfd before the build) 3. you probably want to target the OTF variant http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Choosing_the_right_font_format_to_package 4. please add a fontconfig rule that substitute your new name to old standard so documents that reference old standards continue to work 5. 69 is probably a bit low as priority, 60 would be fine for a good cyrillic font as this one is 6. why do you feel you need to change hinting for this font? 7. please register it as a serif font in fontconfig Anyway Old standard is a very nice font and I hope you'll make a nice package from it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 16:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121644.m9CGiuh2031498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-12 12:44:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > ok ..will fix them soon I'll review it just as soon as you post a new spec file, I promise :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121841.m9CIffLA026223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #14 from Ulrich Drepper 2008-10-12 14:41:37 EDT --- I've uploaded a new .spec file and .src.rpm. Sorry for the delay, too many things happening at the same time. http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools-1.6.5-3.fc9.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/drepper/pfstools.spec When I run rpmlint I still get some warning: $ rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/pfstools*-1.6.5-3.fc9.x86_64.rpm pfstools-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. pfstools-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These should be fine. The documentation files for the -libs and -devel package are the same as for the main package. No need to duplicate them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121847.m9CIlNBs027471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-12 14:47:22 EDT --- I think you should keep "%doc doc/*" in the %files section and use "DOCDIR={_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}" as a make parameter (plus maybe some other parameters to make things work properly). If you have a look at /usr/share/doc directory you will see that pretty much all the applications have their doc directories as "%{name}-%{version}". Let's keep things the way they are. Other than that, the package is ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 18:50:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121850.m9CIoLlU028144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 14:50:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Are you sure this software won't be against Fedora's emulator policy? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/SoftwareTypes#Emulators > Also, from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games : > > But generally, if it requires ROM files, image files, or a copy of > the machines BIOS/firmware to work, we won't package it. Well, that's why I submitted it, I want to find out if it is acceptable in Fedora (RPMFusion does not allow packages which could be included in Fedora). Could this not be used to run homebrew (and thus not patented nor copyrighted) games etc? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 19:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121904.m9CJ4B5R030652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-12 15:04:10 EDT --- Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=875246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 19:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121925.m9CJPJRO002786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-12 15:25:18 EDT --- Package fails to build in mock. You need to add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 19:48:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810121948.m9CJmLXk007316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-12 15:48:20 EDT --- Partial/initial review comments moved from bug 466343: 1) BuildRequires: tcl-devel would result in some TCL support built in. Not sure if it's desirable though, but would be good to explicitly enable/disable it for reproducible builds. 2) A private copy of libedit is used; would be good to make use of the separately packaged system libedit. 3) A GUI is included in the sources, but not installed. Is this on purpose? 4) ipmitool seems to be capable of using freeipmi as well. I haven't tried it but I suppose "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" would build it in. Same thing as comment 1) about reproducible builds applies, but wouldn't it make sense to split ipmitool into a completely separate package instead of bundling it in here? The Mandriva openipmi package seems to have a bunch of improvements over the Fedora/EL one, such as TCL support, UI (whose separation allows fewer dependencies in the main package, e.g. TCL) and GUI subpackages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 20:10:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122010.m9CKAFob012498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #17 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-12 16:10:14 EDT --- Done for mediawiki-imagemap-0-0.1.r37906.fc8 and mediawiki-imagemap-0-0.1.r37906.fc9 When pushing mediawiki-imagemap-0-0.1.r37906.fc10 I get an error: ------------------------- 500 Internal error The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from fulfilling the request. Powered by CherryPy 2.3.0 ------------------------- :-?????? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 20:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122018.m9CKI2iq014268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #48 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-12 16:18:00 EDT --- Since the discussion on fedora-packaging seems to have ceased without reaching a conclusion and there isn't a need to be able to have many versions of Gromacs concurrently installed, I have removed the support for environment-modules and just renamed all binaries to start with g_ . Since everything resides in standard locations the package should now be acceptable for distribution, please review. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm gromacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs4 gromacs-csh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized csh GROMACS support gromacs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-mpi-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-tutor.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: no-documentation gromacs-zsh.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized zsh GROMACS support 12 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 20:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122023.m9CKNVEf015191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #17 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-12 16:23:29 EDT --- done for: htmlparser-1.6-3.fc8 htmlparser-1.6-3.fc9 Dunno how to do the equivalent for devel... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 20:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] New: Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Summary: Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4RC3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MPFI is intended to be a portable library written in C for arbitrary precision interval arithmetic with intervals represented using MPFR reliable floating-point numbers. It is based on the GNU MP library and on the MPFR library and is part of the latter. The purpose of an arbitrary precision interval arithmetic is on the one hand to get "guaranteed" results, thanks to interval computation, and on the other hand to obtain accurate results, thanks to multiple precision arithmetic. The MPFI library is built upon MPFR in order to benefit from the correct roundings provided by MPFR. Further advantages of using MPFR are its portability and compliance with the IEEE 754 standard for floating-point arithmetic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 20:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122059.m9CKxs3S023163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #57 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-12 16:59:52 EDT --- It is not blocker - sim already in fedora updated many time. However, in any case it is also already added and updates submited (see below). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 21:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122101.m9CL113Q023921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ismael at olea.org) | --- Comment #35 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-12 17:00:57 EDT --- Opened ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 21:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122110.m9CLAgD9026142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #49 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-12 17:10:41 EDT --- $ wget http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm --2008-10-12 23:10:01-- http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Resolving theory.physics.helsinki.fi... 128.214.57.188 Connecting to theory.physics.helsinki.fi|128.214.57.188|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2008-10-12 23:10:01 ERROR 403: Forbidden. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 21:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122111.m9CLBW1x026107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #58 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-12 17:11:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) > It is not blocker - sim already in fedora updated many time. It should not have been accepted with some blocking issues that were still present when it was approved, but went unnoticed. Having the package built doesn't mean that it is in shape for fedora. There are still many packages from the former fedora core that are not in good shape, also. > However, in any > case it is also already added and updates submited (see below). It seems to be fixed in cvs, right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 21:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122117.m9CLH585027408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-12 17:17:04 EDT --- Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and specially http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java You have to use macro for the spec file (that what miss most to "start" review). Please also read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers So you can get sponsored. For license problem, it is the one on top of each source file (if any) that matter. I have matio ready if you want to save time on scilab5 packaging...(i will submit it soon). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 21:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122135.m9CLZEqe031350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 --- Comment #17 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-12 17:35:11 EDT --- Pushed into bodhi. Thanks for the tip! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 22:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122202.m9CM2Qqp004383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #3 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-12 18:02:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock.spec > SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/flexdock-0.5.1-1.fc9.src.rpm > Description: flexdock java class files & JNI generated binary. Provides Swing > GUIs with a dock user interface element. Uploading as library is required for > (later) packaging of Scilab. Are you going to package Scilab, too, then? That's great. Let me know if I can help either with packaging or reviewing. I can also sponsor you, but please do a couple of reviews and point me to them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 22:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] New: Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Summary: Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/iml.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/iml-1.0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: IML package provides efficient routines to solve nonsingular systems of linear equations, certified solve any shape systems of linear equations, and perform mod p matrix operations, such as computing row-echelon form, determinant, rank profile, inverse of a mod p matrix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 12 23:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810122325.m9CNPX0m021451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 19:25:31 EDT --- 8e60459257b6ec5d43ad34b5cd330a8f publican-ovirt-0.4.tgz Thanks - looks good now. Package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130041.m9D0f0xG004382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 20:40:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > > Nicolas, I feel like this would be a good candidate for naming > > "arabeyes-Thabit-fonts". > > lowercase please The upstream name is clearly Thabit: do you think we should lowercase it? Personally I usually prefer to preserve upstream casing as far as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:45:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130045.m9D0jJMh005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|wtogami at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #4 from Warren Togami 2008-10-12 20:45:18 EDT --- http://togami.com/~k12linux-temporary/fedora/9/src/ltsp-server-livesetupdocs-0.0.1-1.fc9.src.rpm I ran out of time and had to spin with something so I made my own package. Unassigning myself because I cannot review my own package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:47:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130047.m9D0lBuU005503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |Thabit-fonts -Thabit-fonts |Thabit-fonts from |from Arabeyes.org |Arabeyes.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 00:58:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130058.m9D0wcV0007718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 20:58:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The review is completed, unless someone thinks that I need to look over the > package again. Sorry: I meant it would be good time to build this now for f10 final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:01:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130101.m9D11c7b008776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 --- Comment #4 from Nigel Jones 2008-10-12 21:01:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I retrieved the latest source from the upstream developer and created a new > spec file from scratch. > > Spec URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl.spec > SRPM URL: http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl-2.0.0.0.fc9.src.rpm Per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires you need: BR: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 Depend: java >= 1:1.6.0 Seems to build with that, I'll finish the review on the basis that this has been done and we'll go from there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:07:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130107.m9D17tS5009545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-12 21:07:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts-1-1.fc9.src.rpm > http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/69oldstandard-fonts.spec I still don't understand why the package is being named 69oldstandard-fonts?? Is the correct name oldstandard-fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:16:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448072] Review Request: spin-kickstarts - Kickstarts and templates for creating custom Fedora Spins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130116.m9D1GlsM011058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448072 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-12 21:16:46 EDT --- Built for rawhide from the master branch http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=876171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130135.m9D1Z9Wn013974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-12 21:35:08 EDT --- Indeed, all tests worked locally and, according to the advices I have received via IRC, not running the tests during koji build is fine. I'll do a full review soon, but could you please consider wrapping the disabled tests in a conditional block, so that one could do a local build in the form rpmbuild --rebuild "with tests" perl-Net-Daemon ? It's not a blocker, but I think it is more elegant than blindly deleting them and it only takes very few additional lines in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130153.m9D1rCt3016575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 21:53:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:55:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130155.m9D1tYL7017216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Bug 428798 depends on bug 460287, which changed state. Bug 460287 Summary: Review Request: htmlparser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:55:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460287] Review Request: htmlparser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130155.m9D1tXEZ017182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 21:55:32 EDT --- Currently there is no need to submit a push request for F-10. When you think F-8/9 packages can be moved from testing to stable repository, please edit the submitted request on bodhi. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:55:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130155.m9D1tRRb017022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 21:55:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130154.m9D1sRvx016613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 21:54:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130156.m9D1umsQ017429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 21:56:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130157.m9D1v4sF017388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Bug 428798 depends on bug 460289, which changed state. Bug 460289 Summary: Review Request: vldocking https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 01:57:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 21:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460289] Review Request: vldocking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130157.m9D1v41J017360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460289 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-12 21:57:02 EDT --- Now closing. When you think F-8/9 packages can be moved from testing to stable repositories, please edit the submitted requests on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130207.m9D27V1j019477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:07:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130208.m9D28OLC019458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:08:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:10:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:10:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130210.m9D2AnU8020208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:10:48 EDT --- Short description here should be a _very_ short description... Typically thats taken from the spec files Summary line. Can you shorten your request to just a short sentence for Short Description? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130214.m9D2EK0t020544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:14:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:16:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464460] Review Request: pypop - Python for Population Genomics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130216.m9D2GIdI021155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464460 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:16:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130212.m9D2CLjr020387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:12:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:15:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130215.m9D2FNa2020912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:15:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:21:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130221.m9D2Lrts022080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:21:52 EDT --- Is there any issue here with video codec patents? Or does this only operate on the avi container? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 02:36:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207796] Review Request: eventlog - Syslog-ng v2 support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130236.m9D2aGgv024626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207796 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-12 22:36:15 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 03:15:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130315.m9D3Fx6F031558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #17 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-12 23:15:57 EDT --- Upstream has put out a new release with a substantial fixes to the license 'pollution' issue. There are now no more source codes with GPL licence (to the best of my knowledge). However a small portion of it still caries LGPL only, so I've resorted to using LGPLv2 in the specfile license tag. Upstream has indicated their interest to resolve all the remaining license issues, and when that happens we may update the license tag to LGPLv2+ . I hope the review can continue now, Thanks. Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/trilinos/trilinos.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/trilinos/trilinos-9.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Note: The packaging have undergone some changes since it was first introduced, mainly that it now builds with MPI support, and enables all the subpackages available in the trilinos suite. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 03:40:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466394] Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130340.m9D3eTnf003129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 03:40:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2008 23:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130340.m9D3eUrF003160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Bug 465511 depends on bug 466394, which changed state. Bug 466394 Summary: Review Request: pdf-renderer - A 100% Java PDF renderer and viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466394 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 04:04:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466066] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Types - Organise your Moose types in libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130404.m9D44dw3006993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466066 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-13 00:04:38 EDT --- Imported and building in devel. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 04:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130451.m9D4psJW014250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #18 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-13 00:51:53 EDT --- @ Jens I guess preserving the upstream naming is fine . @Nicolas Had problem with my net connection ..will upload tonight :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130509.m9D59PBo017295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 01:09:24 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=876482 <-- In rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:27:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130527.m9D5RDaB021731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-13 01:27:12 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130529.m9D5TcD7022111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:27:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130527.m9D5RkaT021827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 451407 depends on bug 455111, which changed state. Bug 455111 Summary: Review Request: python-webob - WSGI request and response object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455111 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-13 01:27:44 EDT --- I'll take this one. rpmlint is silent source match upstream bdc4f8597c1d9500636f09bf52ed9d33 WebTest-1.0.tar.gz bdc4f8597c1d9500636f09bf52ed9d33 WebTest-1.0.tar.gz MUST: * package is named appropriately * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * specfile name matches %{name} * summary and description fine * correct buildroot * %{.dist} is used * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager tag not used * Vendor tag not used * Distribution tag not used * License used and not Copyright * Summary tag does not end in a period * specfile is legible * package successfully compiles and builds on at least x86 * make sure lines are <= 80 characters * specfile written in American English * no -doc sub-package necessary * no libraries * no rpath * not a GUI app * no -devel sub-package necessary * macros used appropriately and consistently * no %makeinstall * install section must begin with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} * no locale data * no Requires(pre,post) * package not relocatable * package contains code * package owns all directories and files * no %files duplicates * %defattrs present ( %defattr(-, root, root, -)) * %clean present * %doc files do not affect runtime SHOULD: * package should include license text in the package and mark it with %doc * package should build on i386 ? package should build in mock - I haven't tried, but I don't think it'll be a problem APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:28:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455396] Review Request: TrustedQSL - TrustedQSL ham-radio applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130528.m9D5S3kO021626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455396 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-13 01:28:02 EDT --- trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/trustedqsl-1.11-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:43:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130543.m9D5hZOP025110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 --- Comment #5 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-13 01:43:34 EDT --- SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/openvas-libraries.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/openvas-libraries-1.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:52:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130552.m9D5qDVR026981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-13 01:52:12 EDT --- Would you try koji scratch build again? (see my comment 1) The build fails on dist-f10, both on i386 and x86_64. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=876308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:56:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130556.m9D5udNp028172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 05:56:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130556.m9D5u9kT028068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130608.m9D68lah030766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #50 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-13 02:08:46 EDT --- OK, now it has the read attribute set :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130608.m9D68pCI030789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ricky Zhou 2008-10-13 02:08:50 EDT --- Thanks! (And by the way, %doc docs/* includes docs/license.txt, which contains the license.) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-webtest Short Description: Helper to test WSGI applications Owners: ricky Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455358] Review Request: xslthl - XSLT Syntax Highlighting for saxon and xalan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130621.m9D6LxW8001135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455358 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Fearn 2008-10-13 02:21:58 EDT --- http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/files/xslthl.spec updated as requested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130622.m9D6MiRF001241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 02:22:42 EDT --- we don't have any mixed-case package right now and I'd rather keep it this way. Mixed case confuses users that update/install from the CLI and fails as soon as there's a windows mirror or a fat usb key involved. So please do use lowercase package names only please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130629.m9D6T8b2002469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 02:29:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I still don't understand why the package is being named 69oldstandard-fonts?? > Is the correct name oldstandard-fonts? The correct upstream name is Old Standard However upstream has asked us to rename if we rebuilt from sfds I guess 69oldstandard is as good as any renaming (though I'd have used 69-old-standard-fonts) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:54:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130654.m9D6sisf007731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #13 from srinivas 2008-10-13 02:54:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openwsman Short Description:Web Services Management libraries Owners: srini Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC:mdomsch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130655.m9D6t11m007921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-13 02:55:00 EDT --- Upstream replies: "It turns out that one of the octopus developers (Xavier Andrade) has decided to try to remove METIS, substituting it by a free alternative (ZOLTAN). We also removed expokit, and as I said qshep is also non-essential. So it may very well be that next release of octopus (unknown date) will be free of license problems." Until a license problem free version is available, octopus cannot be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 06:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130653.m9D6rbfU008029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #13 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-13 02:53:36 EDT --- As it says about himself ( http://divfixpp.sourceforge.net/about.htm ): DivFix++ is complete rewrite of "DivFix" program due it's bugs and low performance. This program designed to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file. So, I think it is working only with avi-container. But I'm not shure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:04:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130704.m9D745ih009908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(kushaldas at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #14 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 03:04:04 EDT --- Since Reporter seems not willing to update here, Closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130712.m9D7CX2B012257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 03:12:31 EDT --- + is OK - is NEED work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=876684 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. openvas-libraries.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-2-2 1.0.2-2.fc10 ==> correct it at time of cvs import. + source files match upstream url 9113c17581ffec1b1c490896b63422f1 openvas-libraries-1.0.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags used correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + ldconfig scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package openvas-libraries-1.0.2-2.fc10 -> Provides: libopenvas.so.1 libopenvas_hg.so.1 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libgnutls.so.26 libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libnsl.so.1 libopenvas.so.1 libopenvas_hg.so.1 libpcap.so.0.9 libresolv.so.2 libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_2.2) libresolv.so.2(GLIBC_2.9) libutil.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Package openvas-libraries-devel-1.0.2-2.fc10 -> Requires: /bin/sh libopenvas.so.1 libopenvas_hg.so.1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130743.m9D7ht3M018809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-13 03:43:53 EDT --- I think is fine to close now with the ?NEXTRELEASE? tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:44:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130744.m9D7i0dv018872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 Ismael Olea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-13 03:43:59 EDT --- I think is fine to close now with the ?NEXTRELEASE? tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:45:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130745.m9D7jRjj019296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2008-10-13 03:45:26 EDT --- Yes, I am aiming to get a scilab package uploaded. I have a (private) basic scilab package all up and running (minus GUI), but I wanted to work out the approval/packaging process. The only thing its missing to get the scilab working in GUI mode is flexdock :) Nicolas: As of scilab 5, I believe matio is not directly required and scilab can (optionally) use its own code (or embedded code) to support these operations. (reference: http://wiki.scilab.org/Dependencies_of_Scilab_5.X). The java guidelines are a bit out of date, and keep talking about using the non sun java components (IcedTea, gcj); it's hard to tell what does and does not apply here. > You have to use macro for the spec file By macro I assume you mean that i should be installing the JNI .so files to %{_libdir}/%{name}? I can update the spec file accordingly. Otherwise if you are referring to the general format of the spec file, the original spec file was generated using vim, as per (my interpretation of) the packaging guidelines. Is something incorrect? Dominik: I read the guidelines a few times, for me the process is still a little fuzzy. I am following the procedure outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join, and am up to the part " Watch for Feedback" -- How do I fix the FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- It seems a little bit of a chicken and egg problem, I have to submit packages and get approval to get a sponsor, but can't do that until I have a sponsor... ? The guidelines say "When the package is APPROVED by the reviewer, you must separately obtain member sponsorship in order to check in and build your package." -- so shouldn't I be trying to get approval now??? Confused. Thanks for the help -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:48:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466717] New: Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Summary: Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-cvxopt.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-cvxopt-1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: CVXOPT is a free software package for convex optimization based on the Python programming language. Its main purpose is to make the development of software for convex optimization applications straightforward by building on Python's extensive standard library and on the strengths of Python as a high-level programming language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 07:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 03:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130759.m9D7x45f021815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 03:59:04 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=876733 <-- Builds in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:01:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130801.m9D81qkK022917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-13 04:01:51 EDT --- Is this package to be installed on a specific spin/live cd? I think that the description is misleading, since this package is not especially about ltsp, but about fusionning a virtual bridge with a real interface. I don't deny that it is of specific help for ltsp, but I don't think that this should be stressed that much. I'd suggest the following: Summary: Howto fusion a virtual interface with emphasis on LTSP %description A documentation explaining how to fusion a virtual bridge interface with a real interface. This is required in a LTSP server setup, hence there is some emphasis put on this case. A desktop file that is added to all the new user desktops directing to that documentation is also part of this package. The admin can remove this package after the setup is complete. Also I'd suggest using xdg-open and not firefox in the desktop file, and depend on xdg-open. The source should not be only in srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:02:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130802.m9D822nw023317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Alan Pevec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-13 04:02:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: publican-ovirt Short Description: Common documentation files for oVirt Owners: apevec tsagadai Branches: F-9 EPEL InitialCC: jfearn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:06:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130806.m9D8620e024746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #8 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-13 04:06:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > few notes > - you can use "svn export" instead of "svn checkout" (or a even script like > http://fedora.danny.cz/fedora-getsvn), the source archive will be smaller, but > when you are using upstream released snapshots, use them good hint > - the EVRs in Obsoletes/Provides are inconsistent between main package and > -server subpackage and I don't think that the main package should contain > Obsol/Prov for vnc-server fixed > - better use --with-os-name="Fedora" in xserver's %configure (instead of > "Fedora 11") might be > - replace /etc with %{_sysconfdir}, /etc/rc.d/init.d with %{_initddir} in > %build and %install sections fixed > - don't add X-Red-Hat-Extra into desktop file, fix the file directly instead of > using command line options, use fedora as vendor, missing BR: > desktop-file-utils - more about desktop files at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files should be fixed as well. Updated srpm & spec: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc.spec http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc-1.5.0-0.4.svn2975.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:09:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130809.m9D89W6a025453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-13 04:09:30 EDT --- Also point 16. should be removed, it is a bad idea, and the part about adding a user should certainly be in another document (or a link to a fedora user manual that provides those instructions). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130808.m9D88BIM025302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-13 04:08:09 EDT --- On the document itself I would suggest * removing explicit reference to the Fedora version. * remove the following paragraph, it is redundant with point 2. and, unless I am wrong the media has already been selected: While LiveDVD is possible, LiveUSB with persitent overlay is recommended because it is more efficient in RAM usage. Be warned that your overlay or ramdisk will fill up and the demo will fail after a while, so do not rely on this Live image for production services. For production please install it onto a real hard drive. I think that 'Setup Instructions' should be changed to something along 'LTSP server network interface setup instructions' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:11:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130811.m9D8BrxF026387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #10 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-13 04:11:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: publican-ovirt New Branches: Branches: F-9 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:19:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130819.m9D8JWO1027969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-13 04:19:29 EDT --- MUSTFIX: - Package's NEVR doesn't comply to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release - Package doesn't install *info's correctly. Something similar to this is missing: Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(pre): /sbin/install-info %post /sbin/install-info \ --info-dir=/usr/share/info /usr/share/info/mpfi.info.gz || : %preun: if [ $1 = 0 ]; then /sbin/install-info --delete \ --info-dir=/usr/share/info /usr/share/info/mpfi.info.gz || : fi - Package split: Provided this package doesn't provide any run-time usable library or applications, and contains devel-docs only, the "mpfi base package" doesn't make sense, IMO. My recommendation: Move the info file to *-devel and don't ship a base package. CONSIDER: I am not sure if shipping this package makes much sense, because browsing their site indicates this project might be pretty much dead (Take into account, you are building from a 2.5 years old "release candidate" tarball). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 08:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458784] Review Request: xcb-util - The xcb-util module provides a number of libraries which sit on top of libxcb In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130837.m9D8bsDJ031863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458784 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 17078 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-13 04:37:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The license issue is unfortunately a blocker. > Sure. Pinged on upstream BZ. > Another comment is that, in my opinion, it is better in general > to have make variables passed as make arguments and not as > shell env variables (though both work with gnu make), like: > > make install DESTDIR="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" INSTALL="install -p" That sounds reasonable. * Mon Oct 13 2008 Michal Nowak - 0.3.0-3 - move from system env vars to local GNU make ones http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util.spec http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/xcb-util/xcb-util-0.3.0-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 09:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130904.m9D94c3X006039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Dennis Jang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) | --- Comment #33 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-13 05:04:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/extra/0.7/un-extra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://smallvil.fedorapeople.org/rpm/un-fonts/extra/0.7/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc10.src.rpm -fixed subpackage description and fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 09:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130915.m9D9FQwB008006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-13 05:15:25 EDT --- python-cssutils-0.9.5.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cssutils-0.9.5.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 09:15:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810130915.m9D9FvMI008657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mnowak at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #6 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-13 05:15:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1. unless upstream has confirmed 1.0 is the actual font revision, and it will > version further updates, please use 20020502 as version > ? check the version > My version guess is based on output from gnome-font-viewer. Says: "Version 1.00" > 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers > unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get > him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) > ? add some fontconfig rules > I am somewhat busy at the moment, this might take me some time, but I am definitely for have it packed. > 3. unless you *know* upstream is going to release new fonts in the same > archive, there is no need to prepare for subpackaging. Upstream is just as > likely to publish separate archives, which will mean separate packages (see the > gfs fonts for examples). If upstream does end up adding new fonts to this very > archive, you can always go the obsolete route > ? drop the "just in case" subpackaging > Dropped. > Non blocking remarks > > 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font See Fedora fonts ml. Just pinged them. > 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge See Fedora fonts ml. http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font-1.00-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:16:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131016.m9DAGxwY020705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|rpm at greysector.net | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 06:16:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Dominik: > I read the guidelines a few times, for me the process is still a little fuzzy. > I am following the procedure outlined here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join, and am up to the part " > Watch for Feedback" -- How do I fix the FE-NEEDSPONSOR -- It seems a little bit > of a chicken and egg problem, I have to submit packages and get approval to get > a sponsor, but can't do that until I have a sponsor... ? You can submit packages and do non-authoritative reviews before getting sponsored. In fact, that's the best way to convince a someone (me, for example) to sponsor you. After that person approves you for membership in the "packager" group in the Fedora Account System, you will be able to import and build any approved package. > The guidelines say "When the package is APPROVED by the reviewer, you must > separately obtain member sponsorship in order to check in and build your > package." -- so shouldn't I be trying to get approval now??? Confused. You should find someone to sponsor you. Usually, sponsorship happens at the same time as your first package is approved. As I said, I can do that after I'm satisfied that you have learned to follow our packaging guidelines. I'll take the review of this package now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131044.m9DAiKSS026149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131042.m9DAgknJ026836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-13 06:42:45 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:51:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131051.m9DApcnY028099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-13 06:51:33 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131052.m9DAqdQj028343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] New: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/matio.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/matio-1.3.3-2.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files koji build on Fedora Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 10:53:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 06:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466241] Review Request: starlab - A Software Environment for Collisional Stellar Dynamics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131053.m9DArq10029074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466241 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-13 06:53:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review Marek! Thanks for CVS branches Kevin! Thanks for the package Lubomir. Eeeek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 11:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131137.m9DBbQ9C006148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 07:37:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Upstream replies: > > "It turns out that one of the octopus developers (Xavier Andrade) has > decided to try to remove METIS, substituting it by a free alternative > (ZOLTAN). We also removed expokit, and as I said qshep is also > non-essential. So it may very well be that next release of octopus > (unknown date) will be free of license problems." That's encouraging. > Until a license problem free version is available, octopus cannot be packaged. Or you could try backporting whatever changes they made to remove the non-free code, but that's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 11:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131143.m9DBhbtT007137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-13 07:43:36 EDT --- I'm packaging mocha for Fedora as well, so as soon as that is in, the tests could be enabled. I was thinking I wouldn't need to add a dep-like blocker on this review however since it's only a test. I've made rpmlint silent on the space/tab issue as well. Adjusted the license to "BSD" I've uploaded a new SPEC and SRPM at: SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby.spec SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 11:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] New: Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-te.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-te-0.20050929-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Telugu hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 11:48:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 07:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] New: Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-br.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-br-0.20030417-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Breton hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131303.m9DD3KOH025586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 09:03:19 EDT --- Perfect. Thanks! APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131329.m9DDTqER031603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #13 from Steve Milner 2008-10-13 09:29:51 EDT --- Sorry folks but I'm going to bow out on this :-/ ... anyone else is free to pick it up and take it from here if they have the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131328.m9DDSRUs031339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #8 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-13 09:28:26 EDT --- OK. I changed it. Now if you want to call network tests use: rpmbuild --rebuild --with network-tests ... Spec URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://o5za5.cz/fedora/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:31:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131331.m9DDV6if000715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 --- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-13 09:31:05 EDT --- A new version was release. I have updated the SRPMS basd on this. Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon-8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Moon activity for the sugar desktop Builds in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877387 One warning in rpmlint: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:38:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131338.m9DDcIBZ001513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #8 from Warren Togami 2008-10-13 09:38:08 EDT --- I am out of time, departing in less than 18 hours to a conference where I need this media. Media is already spun. No time to redo it. This will be released as "rc1". Please discuss with Peter to make further improvements to this package for rc2 or final. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:39:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131339.m9DDdPoT002718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #5 from vivek shah 2008-10-13 09:39:24 EDT --- The spec file uses %configure which appends %{optflags} to CFLAGS so an explicit listing of %{optflags} is not required in the %build stage. I have updated BuildRequires to include libXft-devel which will pull in the other dependencies as mentioned by you in an earlier note. I have also added the desktop file. SPEC URL : http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnurobots.spec SRPM URL : http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnurobots-1.2.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131401.m9DE18gw007705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 --- Comment #19 from Deji Akingunola 2008-10-13 10:01:06 EDT --- It was missing a BR on gcc-gfortran (used to be pulled in by lam-devel, but that has now been replaced by openmpi-devel). Spec URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/trilinos/trilinos.spec SRPM URL: ftp://czar.eas.yorku.ca/pub/trilinos/trilinos-9.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm The scratch build below has completed successfully for i386 and x86_64; http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 13:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131355.m9DDt7Pr007243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-13 09:55:06 EDT --- Excellent, all is OK. Mind that the correct switch is --with network_tests not network-tests, please modify the newest changelog entry accordingly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:05:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131405.m9DE54oU009951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #10 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-13 10:05:02 EDT --- fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:09:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131409.m9DE98CC009531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-13 10:09:07 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines including the Perl specific items [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPL+ or Artistic (same as perl) [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 15c1dc7744079a2c283de4129652b7c9b5024f12 Net-Daemon-0.43.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Not tested , but it's a standard perl module and should work anywhere [?] Package functions as described. --> make test is OK [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:11:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] New: Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Summary: Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jsafrane at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec and SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/ipmitool/1/ Description: IPMItool is an utility for interfacing with local or remote devices that support Intelligent Platform Management Interface specification. IPMI is an open standard for machine health, inventory, and remote power control. IPMItool is shipped now in OpenIPMI-tools package. But the IPMItool itself does not have anything common with OpenIPMI and should be packaged separately. I'll drop it from OpenIPMI-tools when this package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131413.m9DEDnRv010692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #2 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-13 10:13:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 4) ipmitool seems to be capable of using freeipmi as well. I haven't tried it > but I suppose "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" would build it in. Same thing as > comment 1) about reproducible builds applies, but wouldn't it make sense to > split ipmitool into a completely separate package instead of bundling it in > here? I've created separate package for ipmitool, see bug #466762. It would be better to review it first and I'll create new .spec for OpenIPMI (without ipmitool and maybe with the ideas mentioned above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:17:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:17:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131417.m9DEHUhI012948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 --- Comment #15 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-13 10:17:27 EDT --- I have created yet another version http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/gpt-3.2-11.fc9.src.rpm based on the feedback from the upstream maintainer. The details for the reasons for the changes are discussed in the upstream bugzilla: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:18:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131418.m9DEIE6i013240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131424.m9DEOJNZ013343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 10:24:17 EDT --- The other way to generate hunspell dictionary from actual aspell source is as prezip-bin -d telugu.words wordlist2hunspell telugu.words te_IN Thus, you will be using Source tag and actual source tarball in SRPM. What do you say? Do you still want to use BR:aspell-te way or use of actual source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:33:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131433.m9DEXV0W015892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 10:33:30 EDT --- bleh, this build breaks. I'll have to scrounge up the version on my laptop that works. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131431.m9DEVpKo017123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 10:31:50 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877579 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131439.m9DEdDq7017330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 10:39:12 EDT --- OK, got it. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:38:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131438.m9DEcLkG017108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 10:38:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320191) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320191) Modified SPEC that will use upstream Source -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131429.m9DETbhi016279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] New: Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 Summary: Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.2b-1.src.rpm Description: A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:41:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131441.m9DEfpxm019499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 10:41:47 EDT --- Starting official review, and I can sponsor you. In the meantime, please complete some unofficial reviews for others, and post links here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:47:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131447.m9DElRpJ019380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 10:47:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.2b-2.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877626 %changelog * Mon Oct 13 2008 Rex Dieter 0.2.2b-2 - fix subpkg deps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131456.m9DEuUXK023405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 10:56:28 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. SRPM: ndisc6.src:76: W: macro-in-%changelog find_lang Macros are expanded in %changelog too, which can in unfortunate cases lead to the package not building at all, or other subtle unexpected conditions that affect the build. Even when that doesn't happen, the expansion results in possibly "rewriting history" on subsequent package revisions and generally odd entries eg. in source rpms, which is rarely wanted. Avoid use of macros in %changelog altogether, or use two '%'s to escape them, like '%%foo'. FIX. rpmlint on RPMs is clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Only includes v2, but OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Running a mock build to test this. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. Consider using %{version} where you can, like in the Source0. SAve yourself work later. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 14:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131457.m9DEvhIp022580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 10:57:42 EDT --- Starting full review. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:00:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131500.m9DF0cb1024821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-13 11:00:32 EDT --- Maybe we should. Might be a little bit too overly-cunning to fiddle. The above way is pretty much what I do for a future proposed hunspell-mt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:02:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466764] Review Request: lensfun - A library to rectify the defects introduced by your photographic equipment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131502.m9DF2mhJ024282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466764 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 11:02:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/lensfun/lensfun-0.2.2b-3.src.rpm scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877655 %changelog * Mon Oct 13 2008 Rex Dieter 2.2.2b-3 - BR: doxygen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131508.m9DF8WuY027423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 11:08:31 EDT --- rpmlint on srpm clean On rpms: ipmitool.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipmievd The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. Is this really necessary? ipmitool.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name ipmievd The init script name should be the same as the package name in lower case, or one with 'd' appended if it invokes a process by that name. Fixable, or does this coorespond with what's in openipmi-tools? I see no upstream future in the patch, but you might want to comment on that in the spec, just the same. Running a mock build to test BuildRequires, but otherwise, other than the above, it looks great on full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:11:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 424841] Review Request: ndisc6 - IPv6 diagnostic tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131511.m9DFBmvC028542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=424841 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 11:11:47 EDT --- BRs are good, so fix the macro in the changelog, show me some sample reviews, and we're good to approve and sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:20:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:20:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131520.m9DFKtSi031095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-13 11:20:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I am out of time, departing in less than 18 hours to a conference where I need > this media. Media is already spun. No time to redo it. > > This will be released as "rc1". Please discuss with Peter to make further > improvements to this package for rc2 or final. No problem. As long as my comments are taken into account, this may be later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:24:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131524.m9DFOOtg032461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 11:24:23 EDT --- Starting full review. . . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:30:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:30:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131530.m9DFUjpm001407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 11:30:44 EDT --- BRs are fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:28:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131528.m9DFSFrk000470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 11:28:13 EDT --- I will fix these things this evening when I get time. As to upstream being dead: this library is a module of the SAGE project, and so it is still helpful to include in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131528.m9DFSxha002032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 11:28:58 EDT --- [0]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/SAGE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:28:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] New: Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Summary: Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon.spec SRPM URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon-1.4-1.f10.src.rpm Description: Framework for generating config files during installation. This package include Satcon perl module and supporting applications. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877501 Rpmlint is silent for both src.rpm and rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:53:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131553.m9DFr4EF007482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 11:52:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877434 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files not verified as dependent aspell-br package is already verified with upstream in its own review. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions:- 1) Can you preserve timestamp of documentation files by using following in SPEC cp -p %{_docdir}/aspell-br*/* . APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:52:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131552.m9DFq8J8008446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-13 11:52:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Maybe we should. Might be a little bit too overly-cunning to fiddle. The above > way is pretty much what I do for a future proposed hunspell-mt. OK. Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=877432 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files not verified as dependent aspell-te package is already verified with upstream in its own review. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. Suggestions:- 1) Can you preserve timestamp of documentation files by using following in SPEC cp -p %{_docdir}/aspell-te*/* . APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 15:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131558.m9DFwNtK008779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 11:58:22 EDT --- New spec and SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4-0.1.RC3.fc9.src.rpm I am not sure how to not ship a base package. There are no files in [0] but it's still created. [0]: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/RPMS/x86_64/mpfi-1.3.4-0.1.RC3.fc9.x86_64.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:01:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131601.m9DG1VLE011067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:01:30 EDT --- Ready to review, but SRPM has been pruned by koji. Please post SRPM to fedorapeople. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:07:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131607.m9DG74aX010960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #12 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-13 12:07:03 EDT --- New version applying comment #11 suggestions: http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight.spec http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-3.fc8.src.rpm Will publish this one. Thanks for your review, Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:11:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131611.m9DGBDUd013365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:11:11 EDT --- rpmlint on SRPM is clean rpmlint on RPMs: sympy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy/utilities/compilef.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. sympy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy/solvers/numeric.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. sympy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy/mpmath/elliptic.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. sympy.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sympy/mpmath/tests/test_elliptic.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. Since these aren't meant to be executable, it would be good to patch out the shebangs and send the patch upstream. Otherwise, full review looks great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131610.m9DGAxfR011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-13 12:10:55 EDT --- Correction: new version SRPM is at http://www.etude-riondel.ch/pm/insight-6.8-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:15:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131615.m9DGF3L1012717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-13 12:15:02 EDT --- Here we go: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/teamgit/teamgit-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:14:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131614.m9DGEjNq013856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:14:39 EDT --- Tried to roll my own from the spec, and the URL is 404. I sort of expected that, given the %tag, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131615.m9DGF7dR014303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Patrick Monnerat 2008-10-13 12:15:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: insight Short Description: Graphical debugger based on GDB Owners: monnerat Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:18:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:18:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452901] Review Request: ocspd - OpenCA OCSP Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131618.m9DGI5P5013437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452901 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:21:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] New: Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Summary: Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jmol.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jmol-11.6-1.10081svn.fc9.src.rpm Description: Jmol is a free, open source molecule viewer for students, educators, and researchers in chemistry and biochemistry. rpmlint output clean: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131626.m9DGQT1n015464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Blocks| |177841 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:26:14 EDT --- Adding FE-NEEDSPONSOR blocker, since you need a sponsor. I'll start a full review soon. In the mean time, please do some practice reviews of other packages needing review, and post links here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131634.m9DGY6Q1018460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:34:05 EDT --- Ready to review, but koji pruned the SRPM, please post to fedorapeople. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 16:56:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131656.m9DGu2Tn024518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 12:56:01 EDT --- Licensing, naming, macros, files, etc, all ok on full review. Extraordinarily simple package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:08:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463902] Review Request: chktex - LaTex semantic checker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131708.m9DH8HSF027668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463902 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] New: Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Summary: Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atorkhov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/boswars-addons.spec SRPM URL: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/boswars-addons-2.5-1.src.rpm Description: A collection of addon maps for Bos Wars real-time strategy game. $ rpmlint *.rpm boswars-addons.noarch: W: no-documentation No documentation available in those addon maps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:03:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131703.m9DH3Kh6026429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #51 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 13:03:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > Since the discussion on fedora-packaging seems to have ceased without reaching > a conclusion and there isn't a need to be able to have many versions of Gromacs > concurrently installed, I have removed the support for environment-modules and > just renamed all binaries to start with g_ . Excellent. > Since everything resides in standard locations the package should now be > acceptable for distribution, please review. > gromacs-bash.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/bash_completion.d/gromacs4 This could be easily fixed. And one last nitpick: %{_bindir}/g_mdrun_mpid is inconsistently named in comparison to all the other binaries which have _d suffix. You can fix both of these upon import. This package is now APPROVED. I have just sponsored you, so you can request the creation of CVS module for gromacs now and import the package after setting up your CVS access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:20:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131720.m9DHKaer028292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Dan Dennedy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at dennedy.org --- Comment #11 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-13 13:20:34 EDT --- I am the maintainer of MLT. Thank you for packaging it for Fedora. My feedback... It is possible to make a LGPL version if that is what you really want to do. You probably have to remove sources from your source RPM to do so. All GPL-based plugins are identified by an empty file named "gpl" in their subdirectory (under mlt/src/modules). Also, the albino, humperdink, miracle, and inigo src subdirectories are GPL. I don't really know the Fedora guidelines, but Development/Libraries seems more appropriate than Development/Tools even though the description uses the word "toolkit." It should be able to build on PPC, but that is not regularly tested as it has not been convenient for me. Maybe I can use some resource at SourceForge for that. More than likely it is something trivial. x86-dependent code should be optional, and the goal of the configure scripts is to detect PPC and disable things appropriately. Regarding compilation optimization flags, another user said -O4 was causing segfault on x86-64 (pending my confirmation), and I may fall back to -O2 for the next release. I recognize Fedora's policy, but there are many also building from source who would like optimization. Also, I agree to remove stripping from future releases. Finally, while I do not consider "miracle" to be generic, I do agree it is somewhat common and certainly unqualified. In fact, I recommend that you do not not install miracle or albino or humperdink. 'inigo' is the core utility that MLT users recognize and whose name I would like to keep. miracle is a rather niche application at this time, and albino and humperdink are companions to miracle. If you do keep miracle for the sake of convenience, then I do not have a problem with you prefacing it with 'mlt-', but again, I'd rather not do that to inigo. Also, I am planning to rename things in the near future while keeping the "MLT" moniker (Media Lovin' Toolkit). I will take Fedora recommendations into consideration for the executables. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131722.m9DHMRsT028651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131747.m9DHluFD004302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 13:47:55 EDT --- looks kosher, unblocking pkg. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452749] Review Request: ocp - Open Cubic Player for MOD/S3M/XM/IT/SID/MIDI music files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131743.m9DHhbu6002891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452749 --- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 13:43:35 EDT --- No, it's not a blocker. And as you said, upstream is going to fix that anyway. Please go ahead and upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 17:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131745.m9DHjYsu003645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |jonstanley at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 13:45:32 EDT --- The reviewer part is done please close the bug when you've finished all the initial import actions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131812.m9DICjq6010926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #52 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-13 14:12:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gromacs Short Description: GROMACS: Fast, Free and Flexible MD Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131826.m9DIQEeM011715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #53 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-13 14:26:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > You can fix both of these upon import. This package is now APPROVED. > I have just sponsored you, so you can request the creation of CVS module for > gromacs now and import the package after setting up your CVS access. Fixed. Thanks a lot. New spec & srpm: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gromacs-4.0-2.fc9.src.rpm I'll push these to the release branches as soon as I'm able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:39:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131839.m9DIdZCC014946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 14:39:34 EDT --- Thanks for the review (both of you). I'll build it as soon as bug 454364 is fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:37:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131837.m9DIbSTQ014598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |454364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131841.m9DIfgw5015647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #16 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-13 14:41:38 EDT --- Yes, I am waiting to add someone from OLPC as a co-maintainer and do additional branches. I have only built for rawhide now. Doing other branches will let Bodhi close the review request eventually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131843.m9DIhbAW018747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-13 14:43:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmp Short Description: A multi-format module player Owners: rathann Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:45:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131845.m9DIjmGx016880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Brian Pepple changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:47:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131847.m9DIlb3a017170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-13 14:47:36 EDT --- > service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipmievd I agree that it should not be. Disabling its autostart is part of the patch submitted in bug 466343: -# chkconfig: 345 99 00 +# chkconfig: - 99 00 > incoherent-init-script-name ipmievd > Fixable, or does this coorespond with what's in openipmi-tools? IMHO, there's nothing to fix here - the init script specifically starts ipmievd, not ipmitool... rpmlint is being a bit silly here. "Obsoletes: OpenIPMI-tools < 2.0.14-3" missing (and possibly "Provides: OpenIPMI-tools = 2.0.14-3" if you think it's necessary, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages) >From bug 466343: "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" should be added, or freeipmi support explicitly disabled for reproducible builds. >From bug 466343: configure with --disable-dependency-tracking for slight build speedup and cleaner build logs? Source0 URL does not match recommended sf.net one: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Wouldn't configuring with --enable-file-security be desirable? "Requires: OpenIPMI" missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131859.m9DIxrB0022684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #12 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-13 14:59:52 EDT --- ok :) here is the update : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/printoxx.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/printoxx-1.6-4.fc9.src.rpm I think that everything is OK. RPM still build under mock and rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 18:59:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131859.m9DIxd8A022585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-13 14:59:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipmievd > > I agree that it should not be. Disabling its autostart is part of the patch > submitted in bug 466343: > > -# chkconfig: 345 99 00 > +# chkconfig: - 99 00 > > > incoherent-init-script-name ipmievd > > Fixable, or does this coorespond with what's in openipmi-tools? > > IMHO, there's nothing to fix here - the init script specifically starts > ipmievd, not ipmitool... rpmlint is being a bit silly here. Agreed. > > "Obsoletes: OpenIPMI-tools < 2.0.14-3" missing (and possibly "Provides: > OpenIPMI-tools = 2.0.14-3" if you think it's necessary, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages) > > From bug 466343: "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" should be added, or freeipmi > support explicitly disabled for reproducible builds. > > From bug 466343: configure with --disable-dependency-tracking for slight build > speedup and cleaner build logs? Works for me. > Source0 URL does not match recommended sf.net one: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net The DNS resolves the same way, but there's no harm fixing it. > Wouldn't configuring with --enable-file-security be desirable? Possbily, not sure of the ramifications. Jan? > "Requires: OpenIPMI" missing? Probably, yes, I think I misunderstood the relationship here. Not needed to build, but it would require at runtime, no? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 19:51:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131951.m9DJpR9M032340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |printoxx Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-13 15:51:26 EDT --- Great. Thanks for the update. One last thing: When printing, the package makes a default call to /usr/bin/lp which is a part of "cups" . But "rpm -q --requires printoxx" does not show cups. Make sure you add a "Requires: cups" before commiting. ------------------------------------------- This package (printoxx) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 19:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810131954.m9DJsXJe003119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #12 from jebba 2008-10-13 15:54:32 EDT --- * Mon Oct 13 2008 jeff - 0.3.0-4 - Build without fomit-frame-pointer ffmath - Add BuildRequires: prelink - clear-execstack libmltgtk2.so - Don't strip binaries - Group: Development/Libraries - Prefix albino, humperdink, and miracle binaries with mlt- I think we want GPL version not LGPL version, correct? Mamoru Tasaka thanks for your help and Dan Dennedy thanks for the comments and for mlt and for kino and... :) http://www.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt.spec http://www.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt-0.3.0-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132013.m9DKDVqZ005267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 16:13:31 EDT --- Patch submitted upstream: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1156 New spec and SRPM URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/sympy.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/sympy-0.6.2-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint on the spec, src.rpm, and generated rpm [0] is clean. [0]: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/RPMS/noarch/sympy-0.6.2-2.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:16:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132016.m9DKGE3B006279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-13 16:16:13 EDT --- srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/logstalgia/logstalgia-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:20:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132020.m9DKKDJw007086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-13 16:20:12 EDT --- Thanks for the interest Jon, when I have your attention could you please have a look on # 254059 too. It has been waiting for some love in 14 months now. Thanks for the help so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:22:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132022.m9DKMsH9007585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-13 16:22:53 EDT --- Thanks Jon! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: teamgit Short Description: Visual tool for Git Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132024.m9DKOj9j010397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #16 from jebba 2008-10-13 16:24:43 EDT --- * Mon Oct 13 2008 jeff - 0.97.7-4 - cp -p fmit.svg - BuildRequires: portaudio-devel Re #14: There is no qt-designer for qt4 and fmit needs it. I'm not sure why the compile flags aren't honored. I'll take a further look at it, but thought I'd add what I have here now. Added "cp -p" =============== I also added a portaudio dep--I can remove this, but I figured I might as well enable the feature as someone may want it. Thanks again! :) ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/fmit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:38:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132038.m9DKcCs5013354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #17 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-13 16:38:09 EDT --- > There is no qt-designer for qt4 and fmit needs it. yes there is, it's in the qt-devel (F9+), or qt4-devel (F8+). That said, designer is a development tool, I've never seen it required to build anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132038.m9DKcBlT013319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 16:38:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > My version guess is based on output from gnome-font-viewer. > Says: "Version 1.00" Unfortunately since 1.00 is the default in many font creation tools that does not mean anything. Experience shows you can have 6-7 successive font updates that all pretend they are 1.00 :( Unless you've verified with upstream 1.00 is really 1.00, and the next one will be something else, the only safe version to use with fonts that declare themselves as 1.00 is the sfd/ttf file timestamp. > > 2. Please add a fontconfig file as Ankur suggested. Since unikurd covers > > unicode blocks Behdad is interested in, I think it shouldn't be too hard to get > > him to help you (I doubt he wants you to stomp on farsi) > > ? add some fontconfig rules > I am somewhat busy at the moment, this might take me some time, but I am > definitely for have it packed. Ok, I guess this is not a blocker but it would be really nice to have. > > Non blocking remarks > > > > 1. please have upstream add the GPL font exception to their font > > See Fedora fonts ml. Just pinged them. > > > 2. please have upstream provide sfd sources if they use fontforge > > See Fedora fonts ml. This was just to trace it :) You've done it publicly and that's very good. > > http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec Ok, some more nitpicking: please use %defattr(644,root,root,755) So: 1. fix the version 2. use %defattr(644,root,root,755) 3. add fontconfig rules (this can wait after import) 4. continue to ask to GPL exception and sfds But in the meanwhile the package is APPROVED. Thank you for your persistence. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now. Please don't forget the comps and wiki bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:50:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132050.m9DKocRL016248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #10 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-13 16:50:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320229) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320229) changes to sawfish spec Hm, I better put that into an attachment or bugzilla will make mincemeat from this .... To make sawfish spec to work with differently packaged librep (depending on who knows what) one needs something like a definition of %librepdir included in an attachment and later in %files section: %{librepdir}/rep/%{_host}/sawfish instead of %{_libexecdir}/rep/%{_host}/sawfish or %{_libdir}/rep/%{_host}/sawfish In order to keep in spec the line %doc po/sawfish.pot lisp/sawfish/ui/WIDGETS-LIST lisp/sawfish/ui/WISHLIST with WIDGETS-LIST actually important, the following is needed in %build section: ( cd po && ./make-pot update ) No idea why this change was made. I still do not know how to set sawfish as a window manager in Gnome environment for rawhide/F10 as /usr/bin/gnome-wm does not seem to work anymore. Changing a key reference there, i.e. now /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager, is apparently not enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132047.m9DKlWcC015554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #76 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-13 16:47:26 EDT --- scala-2.7.2-0.2.RC1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scala-2.7.2-0.2.RC1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 20:53:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:53:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132053.m9DKrXhb016793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-13 16:53:32 EDT --- Not a formal review: * Summary should be simply "An open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D" instead of "Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D" * You should note which svnver you're checking out. E.g. not only "svn co https://jmol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jmol/branches/v11_6/Jmol" but "svn co -r %{svnrel} https://jmol.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jmol/branches/v11_6/Jmol" * Use "svn export" instead of "svn co" * Correct path for icon should be "http://wiki.jmol.org:81/images/Jmol_icon_128.png" * About commented out "Requires:" - jmol doesn't requires java? * Utility "install" ignores switch -c. * No need to explicity create directories with mkdir in your case. You should use "-D" switch of "install" utility, e.g. install -D -p -m 755 jmol %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/jmol * You should use %{name} instead of jmol in your %install section (it simplifies copypasting, for example :). E.g. install -D -p -m 755 %{name} %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} * Conversion of documents must be done in more reliable way. I suggest the following: for txtfile in README.txt COPYRIGHT.txt LICENSE.txt; do iconv -f ASCII -t UTF-8 $txtfile > $txtfile.new && mv $txtfile{.new,} done Probably there are others issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:04:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132104.m9DL4x9I016463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |mnowak at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:04:58 EDT --- Everything is in your hands Michal now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132115.m9DLFa0F019512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #14 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-13 17:15:35 EDT --- Thank you for this review Ogetbil. I'll update the spec before commiting to add "Requires : cups". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:15:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132115.m9DLFJHm019426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 --- Comment #11 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-13 17:15:14 EDT --- Oops! Leftovers! Please replace in attachment (id=320229) two instances of '${_arch}' with '%{_arch}'. Actually it works even "as-is" and that is why I missed it. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132112.m9DLCIQC021626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #311102|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #319715|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #34 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:12:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320232) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320232) Kill conf.avail stuff Thank you for being reactive. Unfortunately that means the use of conf.avail is far too premature (the guideline change process has uncovered problems that won't be fixed short-term) Please apply this patch to use strict guidelines fontconfig install in the meanwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132121.m9DLLl9u021060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Nicoleau Fabien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-13 17:21:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: printoxx Short Description: Print image files Owners: eponyme Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:21:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132121.m9DLLSMM020938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #18 from jebba 2008-10-13 17:21:27 EDT --- * Mon Oct 13 2008 jeff - 0.97.7-5 - %%configure --enable-debug Using --enable-debug addresses the FLAGS problem, but I'm not sure if that is the best way to do it. The other option would be patching out the "-O3 -ffast-math" in configure.ac and exporting $CPPFLAGS (if needed). configure.ac snippet: ================================== AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, [ --enable-debug turn on debugging (default=no)]) if test "x$enable_debug" = "xyes"; then CXXFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -g -DDEBUG" AC_MSG_RESULT(yes) else CXXFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS -O3 -ffast-math" AC_MSG_RESULT(no) fi ================================== As for the 'BuildRequires: qt3-designer' question, without it, the build bombs thusly: ================================== Making all in ui make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7/ui' ConfigForm.ui > ConfigForm.h InstrumentTunerForm.ui > InstrumentTunerForm.h /bin/sh: ConfigForm.ui: command not found /bin/sh: InstrumentTunerForm.ui: command not found make[2]: *** [ConfigForm.h] Error 127 ================================== I'm guessing it is something that upstream should be running before they make the tarball, but i'm not certain. Latest: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/fmit.spec ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/fmit-0.97.7-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132130.m9DLUVJa023150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |smallvil at get9.net Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:30:30 EDT --- Dennis, from now on everything is in your hands -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132127.m9DLRlCT025197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:27:46 EDT --- 1. Anyway, if you revert the conf.avail stuff the package is APPROVED. You can continue from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a now. Please don't forget the comps and wiki bits. 2. Please apply whatever fixes are relevant to the un-core-fonts packages. If un-core-fonts extra fontconfig files are 66, that means un-core-fonts fontconfig files probably need to be 65 (and you need to check with Jens Petersen that does not break japanese). Lastly, do continue to ask upstream : 3. to add the FSF font exception to their licensing. 4. to publish sfds This font package was unusually complex. Congratulations on staying with us so far :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 21:42:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132142.m9DLg9Tk028255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-13 17:42:08 EDT --- Also please split the package in individual font families. I guess you have a good example in un-extra-fonts now. And you need to ask spot to add the Artistic License 2 to the list of approved Fedora font licenses, though I don't think this will be any problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 22:13:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] New: Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Summary: Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openalchemist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openalchemist-0.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: OpenAlchemist is a new reflexion game which looks like Tetris but where you can take your time. Be a crazy alchemist and try to make new objects from those you get from the sky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 22:39:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132239.m9DMdCBo007728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #11 from Orion Poplawski 2008-10-13 18:39:10 EDT --- I'm missing a trailing || : in the %pre client script: %pre client # when upgrading, move /etc/amandates to /var/lib/amanda/amandates [ -f /etc/amandates ] && mv /etc/amandates /var/lib/amanda/amandates || : -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 22:59:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132259.m9DMxfWO010022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at city-fan.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-13 18:59:40 EDT --- Looks good. From a first glance, the only thing that sticks out as needing changing is that your %files list needs to have: %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ rather than: %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/SMTP/SSL.pm so that directories %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ and %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/SMTP/ are owned by the package. Formal review to follow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 23:28:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132328.m9DNSpUm016816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-13 19:28:49 EDT --- perl-libwww-perl isn't a dependency of this package and so we can't assume that it's present. It's very common for perl module directories to have multiple ownership as many unrelated modules share directory paths, e.g.: $ rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Mail/ perl-MailTools-2.03-1.fc9.noarch spamassassin-3.2.5-1.fc9.i386 perl-Mail-DKIM-0.32-3.fc9.noarch perl-Mail-SPF-2.005-2.fc9.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 23:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132322.m9DNM4S8017099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #2 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-13 19:19:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review. As far as the comment, %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ is owned by perl-libwww-perl, but /Net/SMTP/ is not owned (thought it was owned by perl-Net-SMTP, but Net::SMTP is part of perl). Would this cause any conflicts with perl-libwww-perl (I forget how rpm-4.4 handles directory ownership)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 23:31:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132331.m9DNV3UC019003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-13 19:31:02 EDT --- Review: - rpmlint clean - package meets naming guidelines - spec file name matches package name - package meets guidelines - license is same as perl - license tag is correct - no license file in upstream tarball to include (though included README states terms) - spec file written in English and is legible - source matches upstream (size, timestamp, md5sum ba039288ebf7a343feecacd374da8c1a) - latest upstream version packaged - no worrying-looking bugs on CPAN - package builds on on Rawhide x86_64 in mock - buildreqs OK - no locales, shared or static libraries, or devel files to worry about - package is not designed to be relocatable - no duplicate files - permissions sane - %clean section present and correct in spec file - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs, in fact no large anything - docs don't affect runtime - no subpackages - not a GUI app, no desktop file needed - %install section starts by clearing buildroot - all filenames are valid UTF-8 - no scriptlets NEEDSWORK: - directories %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ and %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/SMTP/ need to be owned by the package Fix that and I'll approve this and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 23:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132354.m9DNsqgA022676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 Kaitlin Rupert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kaitlin at linux.vnet.ibm.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Kaitlin Rupert 2008-10-13 19:54:46 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libvirt-cim New Branches: dist-f10 Owners: danms Add Fedora 10 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 13 23:56:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810132356.m9DNut9E023261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #5 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-13 19:56:54 EDT --- Alright, I decided to just be explicit with the directories instead of globbing in any unwanted files. Have another look: http://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/rpm/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL.spec http://people.freedesktop.org/~dbn/rpm/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01-1.fc9.src.rpm Thanks again for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 00:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140013.m9E0DBtp027073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from jebba 2008-10-13 20:13:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fmit Short Description: Free Music Instrument Tuner Owners: jebba Branches: F-9 InitialCC: jebba kevin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 01:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140141.m9E1f5sx014027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-13 21:41:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I am not sure how to not ship a base package. Simply remove the "%files" corresponding to the base package. (In reply to comment #1) > Requires(pre): /sbin/install-info This should have been Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info Sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 01:41:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140141.m9E1fiwQ015679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Dennis Jang changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #37 from Dennis Jang 2008-10-13 21:41:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: un-extra-fonts Short Description: Un Extra families Korean TrueType fonts Owners: smallvil Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: smallvil Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 01:47:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140147.m9E1lWi3016740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry 2008-10-13 21:47:30 EDT --- Practice Review: rpmlint not silent.. g2ipmsg.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot IP Messenger for GNOME 2. g2ipmsg.src: W: invalid-license GPL g2ipmsg.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/g2ipmsg-0.9.6/COPYING g2ipmsg.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/g2ipmsg.schemas spec file does not include full url for source source of version 0.9.6 not available from included website Source does not include the full GPL license Other than the above issues I was able to build with mock and rpmbuild. The package installs and runs fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 01:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140152.m9E1qss0016361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry 2008-10-13 21:52:53 EDT --- Practice review 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 02:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 22:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140237.m9E2bg2w025978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-13 22:37:41 EDT --- New spec/SRPM: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4-0.2.RC3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 03:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140325.m9E3PHmx005451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 --- Comment #1 from Michael Stahnke 2008-10-13 23:25:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec.spec SRPM : http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rspec-1.1.8-1.fc9.src.rpm New version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 04:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140428.m9E4SiN7014538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #13 from jebba 2008-10-14 00:28:42 EDT --- Compiling for x86_64 build on f9 fails with: ===================== cc -o have_mmx.o -c have_mmx.S have_mmx.S: Assembler messages: have_mmx.S:20: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push' ...and for pushf, pop, popf... make[2]: *** [have_mmx.o] Error 1 ===================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 04:55:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140455.m9E4tJZs018497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 00:55:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Re #14: > There is no qt-designer for qt4 and fmit needs it. What I am asking is why this package needs both qt4 and qt3. As far as I checked the build log (for example: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=862773&name=build.log ) this package needs libqt-mt.so.3, which is in qt3 and not in qt(4) and the rebuilt binary rpm does not seem to have dependencies for qt4 packages. More explicit question is "Is qt(4)-devel really required for BuildRequires?" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:00:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140500.m9E50Xoq025318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 01:00:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > The other option would be patching out the "-O3 -ffast-math" in configure.ac - I recommend to patching these out. > As for the 'BuildRequires: qt3-designer' question, without it, the build bombs - This is because qt3-designer pulls qt3-devel in, and without qt3-devel this package won't build. Also here I guess this package is using qt3, not qt4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:04:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465511] Review Request: itext - A Free Java-PDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140504.m9E54MbI019996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465511 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 01:04:21 EDT --- Now closing because this is requested for F-10 (for now) and F-10 build is done by the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:32:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140532.m9E5WrEP024574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:32:52 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-3.0-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-openssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:33:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140533.m9E5Xlaf024715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:33:46 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:32:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453849] Review Request: globus-libtool - Globus Toolkit - Globus libtool package (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140532.m9E5Wj9P024536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453849 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:32:44 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-libtool-1.2-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-libtool.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140533.m9E5XtJw024754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:33:54 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-openssl-module-0.6-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-openssl-module.spec All applied patches submitted upstream: Initialization of openssl module should call SSL_library_init: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4743#c22 Fix a typo in the metadata file: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:32:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:32:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140532.m9E5WYqk024475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:32:33 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-core-5.15-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-core.spec All applied patches submitted upstream: Make file locations configurable: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6451 Environment variable elimination patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6452 Missing functions in configure check: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6453 Detect IOV_MAX correctly (requires _GNU_SOURCE): http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6454 Make GPT_AGE_VERSION available to autotools: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6455 Missing shebang: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6456 Make configure --help look nice: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6457 Fix doxygen documentation installation instructions: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6458 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:33:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453852] Review Request: globus-common-setup - Globus Toolkit - Common Setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140533.m9E5XKng000442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453852 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:33:18 EDT --- This package has been merged into the globus-common package (#453851), since having one without the other does not make sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:33:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140533.m9E5XRtK000475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:33:27 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-openssl-error.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140533.m9E5X6H9000389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-14 01:33:05 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-common-10.2-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-common.spec All applied patches submitted upstream: Environment variable elimination patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6459 Segfault fix patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6460 Allow plugins without the flavor extension in the name: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6461 Remove bogus inter-package dependency: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6462 Fixes a stupid typo in library/Makefile.am: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6463 The file globus_netos_dir.h does not exist: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6464 Doxygen warning fix: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6465 Bad version information: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6466 Configure options not propagated in globus common setup: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6467 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140537.m9E5bMPE025469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 05:40:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140540.m9E5eMmu002384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(geoff+fedora at prog | |rammer-monk.net) | --- Comment #77 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 01:40:20 EDT --- Thank you. When you think the packages submitted on bodhi can be moved from testing to stable repository, please modify the submitted request on bodhi. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:25:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140725.m9E7PgP4026373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-14 03:25:41 EDT --- httperf-0.9.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httperf-0.9.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140729.m9E7TVRg026864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-14 03:29:30 EDT --- httperf-0.9.0-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/httperf-0.9.0-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:43:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140743.m9E7hQ82012144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-14 03:43:25 EDT --- python-webtest-1.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webtest-1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:44:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140744.m9E7i97a030202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-14 03:44:08 EDT --- python-webtest-1.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webtest-1.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:58:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466863] Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140758.m9E7wd5H001375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466863 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |opensource at till.name Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 07:57:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 03:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466863] New: Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466863 Summary: Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? I only need this review ticket to create a branch request: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pam_mount New Branches: F-10 Owners: till -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:13:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226549] Merge Review: Xaw3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140813.m9E8DUhP016348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226549 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140819.m9E8JCFw016879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 04:19:10 EDT --- It seems good: Could you make a script to repackage the source tarball from the vcs ? Why to bundle icons and images as %doc in the -devel package : %doc README.html libMini.css libMini.ico libMini.jpg libMini.ppm ? Why this directory is deleted ? %{__rm} -rf mini/GL What about ABI stability and the fact that Rawhide will enter in development freeze in two weeks ? Wouldn't it be better to wait for a release ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140820.m9E8KSc0017022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-14 04:20:27 EDT --- - rpmlint is silent - package name is ok - the spec file name match the base package - the package meet the packaging guidelines - license is ok (although it can be stated more directly than short notice in Makefile.PL, can you contact upstream to state it more clearly in README or in POD documentation?) - License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - spec file is written in American English. - The spec file for the package is legible. - source has the same md5sum as upstream (d24534cdbbc274338b662d96809430d6) - build successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879575 - all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires - A package own all directories that it creates. - A package do not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - Permissions on files are set properly. - package have a %clean section - package consistently use macros - The package contain code, or permissable content - files in %doc, it do not affect the runtime of the application - At the beginning of %install, each package run rm -rf %{buildroot} - All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. You should have in Requires perl(DBI) since Multi.pm call several times function DBI->foo or DBI::foo. But since the upstream do not have "use DBI" in code, I'll not take it as blocker. But I encourage you to fill it as bug to upstream. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140821.m9E8LtM8007076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 04:21:53 EDT --- Is there a newer snapshot for this ? I will test the whole dependencies against current rawhide using my own experimental repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140830.m9E8UFxG017779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 04:30:14 EDT --- Let me known when you have something ready. (or maybe should we wait for stable lmms as Fedora development Freeze isn't that far). Actually I've missed why wine-devel would be needed on x86_64! As a workaround, maybe it would be possible to have the needed headers bundled within the sources?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 08:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 04:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140846.m9E8kUaQ010685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 04:46:29 EDT --- Package has built fine in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879581 Package built fine in local workstation rpmlint on installed file is quiet Source from src.rpm and upstream matches f47a18735d3a6ebe4cc113c107e657f250e135da libev-3.44.tar.gz 429297 sep 29 05:30 libev-3.44.tar.gz Package is multilibs compliant. OK --------------- This package (libev) is APPROVED by me --------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 09:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140903.m9E93IOh020427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-14 05:03:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Correct path for icon should be > "http://wiki.jmol.org:81/images/Jmol_icon_128.png" With this I get during build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65853: line 52: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65853 (%install) It seems that %{SOURCE2} somehow drops the first quotation mark. Everything else should be fixed. Also I branched the documentation to separate packages. rpmlint output is clean for spec file and the three packages. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jmol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jmol-11.6-2.10081svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 09:15:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140915.m9E9FX4p021737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-14 05:15:32 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream (checked with diff between the included sources and fresh export from SVN) BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. BAD compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. BAD final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. BAD owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. BAD scriptlets present OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK* is a GUI app, desktop file installed - include instructions for getting the sources - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control - snapshot package must contain date in the Release tag - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages - don't disable optimization (export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -O0") - drop the -O0 - rpmlint complains: tightvnc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/tightvnc-1.5.0-svn2975/unix/xserver/*/*.[ch] (about 12 files) run "chmod a-x unix/xserver/*/*.[ch]" after copying the xorg-x11-server-Xorg sources into the tightvnc tree tightvnc-server.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name vncserver can be ignored - the EVR in Obsoletes/Provides must be greater than the EVR of the package we are replacing (use EVR=4.1.2-36, no dist tag) - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages - server subpackage should have "Requires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg" for the ownership of %{_libdir}/xorg/modules/extensions/ - the "always succeed" clause (" || :") is missing from the server's postun scriptlet and from gtk-update-icon-cache too - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache - remove the X-Red-Hat-Extra from the desktop file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 09:17:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140917.m9E9HcdI022002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk --- Comment #3 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-14 05:17:37 EDT --- Okay, I'll take this and review it :-) More to follow.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 09:25:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140925.m9E9PAuW017430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-14 05:25:04 EDT --- OK, that looks fine. A couple of minor comments: 1. Please bump the release number of the package every time you make a change that anyone else (e.g. a reviewer) will see; this removes a possible source of confusion about which version of a package any particular comment applies to, and once you're building packages in Fedora, will ensure that packages you build and subsequently release are consistent with any that people may build locally from CVS. 2. I find it aids readability to append a "/" to directories included in %files lists, just to emphasize that they are directories (which in many cases will include further files, though that's not the case here), e.g. dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ APPROVED. Let me know your account name in the Fedora Account System and I'll sponsor you for membership of the Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 09:55:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226549] Merge Review: Xaw3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810140955.m9E9t6VK022493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226549 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-14 05:55:04 EDT --- formal review is here: OK source files match upstream: efc5b923feda52866c859c59a5b553cb675a69d1 Xaw3d-1.5E.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (MIT). OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. this package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 10:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] New: Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Summary: Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword/perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-3.f10.src.rpm Description: Crypt::GeneratePassword generates random passwords that are (more or less) pronounceable. Unlike Crypt::RandPasswd, it doesn't use the FIPS-181 NIST standard, which is proven to be insecure. It does use a similar interface, so it should be a drop-in replacement in most cases. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879667 $ rpmlint perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 10:40:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448613] Review Request: perl-EV - Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141040.m9EAeC5F031791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448613 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 06:40:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/perl-EV.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/perl-EV-3.44-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Wrapper for the libev high-performance event loop library Changelog - Update to 3.44 - WIP conditional --with systemlibev The system libev cannot be picked at this time. At least it works from the Makefile.PL point of view. The EV.so is linked to -lev and make test showed that the library get loaded. But others tests are failing whereas they work with libev internal. I will request upstream for advices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 10:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141056.m9EAujvi005667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-14 06:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease As mentioned in comment #10, I'm convinced the non-standard version tag should stay in this case. > - source matches upstream FAIL -> source at upstream is in tar.gz format Fixed in release 34. > - no unnecessary BR FAIL > [...] > Please fix the source and useless dependency. ??? BuildRequires: perl-libxml-perl perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) I see no problem here. (In reply to comment #10) > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(XML::Grove) > This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it > once. No explicit provides. Both "perl(XML::Grove)" and "perl(XML::Grove) = 0.46" are generated. It might be a bug in rpmlint or the dependency generator, but not in this package. > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl > perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) > An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in > the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example > scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. > > (the latter is repeated twice) Again, these are bogus. The *.pl files in doc do not have their executable bit set, and the require "perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX)" is justified by other *.pm files in the package. To sum up, the review passed. Several issues about rpmlint and/or the dependency generator are due to be filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 10:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 06:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141059.m9EAxFh7003056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141105.m9EB5FKI007828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at schampijer.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-14 07:05:14 EDT --- Great, thanks for your work! Some little things: We do not need that: %define sugaractivitydir /usr/share/sugar/activities/ %define sugarlibdir %{_libdir}/sugar/activities The License is GPLv2+ License: GPLv2+ A visual nitpick, I think you do not need the tabs at the header, example: Name: sugar-moon Version: 8 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Moon phases activity for sugar Group: Sugar/Activities License: GPLv2+ BuildArch: noarch URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Moon here you should add your email address: * Mon Oct 13 2008 Bryan Kearney - 8-1 The warning is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141106.m9EB6YKs005219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |simon at schampijer.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141112.m9EBCDLM009702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |pertusus at free.fr Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 07:12:12 EDT --- I am quite confused by the status of this review. Who is the maintainer and who is the reviewer? Also it is not right to close it without letting Parag say something. About the version, the comment should pasted here so that everybody can see what reasononing is used. I found: ###### rpmlint error: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha # We use the version tag "0.46alpha" -- the traditional version number of # this module since Sep 1999, immutable through the ages, no matter what the # current Package Naming Guidelines say. which is a very poor argumentation in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:15:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141115.m9EBFkNA007808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 07:15:42 EDT --- I had a quick look at the pkgdb and it looks like Stepan is the maintainer so he definitively cannot grant the review. Marcela seems to be co-maintainer, so this applies too. There are also dozens of co-maintainers that are dubiously interested in the packae, but it is not a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:17:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141117.m9EBHQnb011057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 07:17:25 EDT --- I reset the review flag. But to my surprise Parag doesn't seems to be in CC. I am more and more confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141116.m9EBG7v4010812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:19:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141119.m9EBJaaa008479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-14 07:19:35 EDT --- Sratch build in Koji failed: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:55:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141155.m9EBtlUr021868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #7 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-14 07:55:46 EDT --- Still major issues: - %preun/%post need to be moved to the *-devel subpackage. - The rules in %preun/%post should refer to /usr/share/info using %{_infodir} instead of using hard-coded values. - The *devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} which doesn't exit. One minor cosmetic issue: - The START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY in mpfr.texi references mpfi.info. This causes an ugly reference to mpfi.info in /usr/share/info/dir. I am going to attach patches to address all of these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141157.m9EBvhSi022452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-14 07:57:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320284) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320284) patch to address spec file issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226549] Merge Review: Xaw3d In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141155.m9EBtsBg021984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226549 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-14 07:55:53 EDT --- Thanks, as this new version already is in rawhide, all that remains is to close this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141158.m9EBw8HU019945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #6 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-14 07:58:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/ipmievd > > > > I agree that it should not be. Disabling its autostart is part of the patch > > submitted in bug 466343: > > > > -# chkconfig: 345 99 00 > > +# chkconfig: - 99 00 > > > > > incoherent-init-script-name ipmievd > > > Fixable, or does this coorespond with what's in openipmi-tools? > > > > IMHO, there's nothing to fix here - the init script specifically starts > > ipmievd, not ipmitool... rpmlint is being a bit silly here. > > Agreed. Rpmlit checks also Default-Start, I'll remove the runlevels from there. > > "Obsoletes: OpenIPMI-tools < 2.0.14-3" missing (and possibly "Provides: > > OpenIPMI-tools = 2.0.14-3" if you think it's necessary, see > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages) Obsoletes: added, Provides: sounds silly to me. > > From bug 466343: "BuildRequires: freeipmi-devel" should be added, or freeipmi > > support explicitly disabled for reproducible builds. Here I am not sure if we want dependency on FreeIPMI... It was not there before and most users won't need it. I'll check it together with pknirsch and we'll decide. > > From bug 466343: configure with --disable-dependency-tracking for slight build > > speedup and cleaner build logs? > > Works for me. Done. > > Source0 URL does not match recommended sf.net one: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net > > The DNS resolves the same way, but there's no harm fixing it. Fixed. > > Wouldn't configuring with --enable-file-security be desirable? > > Possbily, not sure of the ramifications. Jan? It just adds additional checks when opening files (like owner, inode, link count etc.). It does not harm nor introduce any performance impact. I'll add it there. > > "Requires: OpenIPMI" missing? > > Probably, yes, I think I misunderstood the relationship here. Not needed to > build, but it would require at runtime, no? AFAIK, ipmitools talks to OpenIPMI driver via /dev/ipmi0. It does not link with OpenIPMI libraries. One may use ipmitool when talking to remote host over IP, completely without need of OpenIMPI. I'll check the freeipmi-devel issue and post new .spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 11:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141158.m9EBwwIS020099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-14 07:58:57 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320285) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320285) patch to address INFO-DIR-ENTRY issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:03:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141203.m9EC3AeW024088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-14 08:03:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-br Short Description: Breton hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:02:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141202.m9EC2GBP021303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 --- Comment #5 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-14 08:02:15 EDT --- Do you want to be the -te maintainer ? So as to keep the same maintainer for all the Indic ones ? I don't mind either way, just giving you that option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:40:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141240.m9ECeFum031979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-14 08:40:13 EDT --- Hello Patrice, (In reply to comment #13) > About the version, the comment should pasted here so that everybody > can see what reasononing is used. You are right, sorry. > ###### rpmlint error: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha > # We use the version tag "0.46alpha" -- the traditional version number of > # this module since Sep 1999, immutable through the ages, no matter what the > # current Package Naming Guidelines say. > > which is a very poor argumentation in my opinion. How would you solve this? Would you change evr to 1:0.46-0.1.alpha.fc10 ? Does this really justify the epoch increase? Wouldn't that confuse people: "oh, 0.46 finally released!" "Oh, wait, ... Dash!, those RH &*!% always advertise different version then they deliver!" But I agree to change evr that way if you do the review for me. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:41:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141241.m9ECfDux032317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-14 08:41:12 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: b48430f22a3311cbaab1e5e9d5cd6b07 tileqt0.4b1.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. FAIL package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Please check http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=879976&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141249.m9ECnAIq001833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 --- Comment #3 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-14 08:49:10 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing. I have made the updates you suggested. You may find them at: Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-moon-8-2.fc10.src.rpm Build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879992 rpmlint still gives warnings (assumed acceptable) [bkearney at localhost sugar-moon]$ rpmlint *.rpm sugar-moon.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities sugar-moon.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:55:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141255.m9ECtiqH006745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #10 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-14 08:55:41 EDT --- Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141255.m9ECtCjL006483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #38 from ritz 2008-10-14 08:55:09 EDT --- I had tried building a multi-lib package before, and ended up with conflict between i386 and x86_64 package. Few of the files are listed below /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/cgi-get.jl /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/cgi-get.jlc /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/compiler.jl /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/compiler.jlc /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/date.jl /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/date.jlc /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/disassembler.jl /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/disassembler.jlc /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/gaol.jl /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/gaol.jlc /usr/share/rep/0.17.2/lisp/lisp-doc.jl ... as pointed out by comment#9, i do not see any reason for a person to install both x86_64 , and i386 version on a system. ------------------------- If otherwise required, i will go ahead and package /usr/share/rep/%{version}/lisp/ under librep-common package. the only question being, how do i build a noarch package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:55:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141255.m9ECt201006132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-14 08:54:58 EDT --- I have built mlt Fedora 8 x86_64 with --disable-qimage --disable-mmx and it worked also for rawhide.(0) But in this last case, i also need to disable see in %prep section: ---------- #disable sse unless x86_64 %ifnarch x86_64 sed -i.checksse -e 's|ifndef __DARWIN__|ifdef __DARWIN__|' src/modules/motion_est/filter_motion_est.c #Note that this conditional is wrong %endif -------------- I haven't checked that, but if mmx is used on ppc, then is will certainly fails. What i expect is mmx should be disabled in all cases unless i686: %configure \ ... %ifnarch i686 --disable-mmx \ %endif So anyone that want to rebuild mlt with theses options can do so with using --target=i686 for the package. There is lot of modules that aren't built. jack-rack, frei0r (1) and sox(2) despite this last has been requested as BuildRequires; and there is also others that cannot be in Fedora. The main interest of mlt using modules is that you can add support for theses module at install step. At the packaging level that would be interesting to have mlt splitted into sub-packages , specially if dependencies are huges (candidate are jack-rack and gtk ). About mlt-config, it is not multilibs compliant: (see l.4: export libdir=/usr/lib64 on lib64 systems) There are two workarounds, either hack the libdir value (if /usr/lib64 exist then... else /usr/lib...), or rewrite it as a wrapper around pkg-config. But It would be possible IMO to just delete it and patch the dependent applications (if any ?) to use pkg-config for mlt detection. (0) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=879994 ppc64 still has failed, might be because of asm conditionals, it should work guess. (1) see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 (2) see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 12:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141256.m9ECujOE004246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 08:56:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Hello Patrice, > > How would you solve this? Would you change evr to 1:0.46-0.1.alpha.fc10 ? > > Does this really justify the epoch increase? > Wouldn't that confuse people: > "oh, 0.46 finally released!" > "Oh, wait, ... Dash!, those RH &*!% always advertise different version then > they deliver!" > > But I agree to change evr that way if you do the review for me. ;-) I am indeed ready to do the review; But I really dislike epochs too. So I think that, even though it is against the guidelines, given that the package seems to be very slowly moving, and with the possibility that upstream skip one version to go straight to 0.47, for example I think that this version is right. So I propose something along: # the version is against the guidelines. However adherence to # the guideline would imply using an epoch, which is very inconvenient. # Given that this package is very slowly moving, and hoping that # upstream skip one version to go straight to 0.47, it seems better # not to use an epoch. If 0.46 is ever released, the epoch way would have # to be used, but we are better avoiding that if possible. That seems to me to be a better argumentation ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:14:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141314.m9EDEth3009371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Josh Boyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Josh Boyer 2008-10-14 09:14:53 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141319.m9EDJiuk013851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:18:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466906] New: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID-1.5.5-1.f10.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides API for correctly changing user identity. Scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=880048 $ rpmlint perl-NOCpulse-SetID-1.5.5-1.f10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-NOCpulse-SetID-1.5.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141322.m9EDMd4r014883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-14 09:22:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ebnetd Short Description: EBNET protocol server Owners: tagoh Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:21:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141321.m9EDL3f3014605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 09:21:02 EDT --- rpmlint is clean all around. License tag should be GPLv3+. Please comment on patch status WRT upstream, and submit upstream if necessary. Would this benefit from a .desktop file and icon? You would either have it run against the example. You could have it run against /var/log/httpd/access_log, but that'd need root and require httpd. Something to consider. Otherwise, full review is good, no BuildRequires missing. And I'll have a peek at 254059. If you wanted to reciprocate, 452107 should be pretty straightforward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:36:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141336.m9EDaNvO018402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 09:36:22 EDT --- Alright, there we go. Looks good. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141348.m9EDmg6Z018282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-14 09:48:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This package has rpath issues on x86_64: > > zeromq.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/zmq_server > ['/usr/lib64'] Fixed upstream. New version 0.3.2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/zeromq-0.3.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:55:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141355.m9EDt0v3019855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #18 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-14 09:54:59 EDT --- ^ I don't mind if you reassing the review to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141349.m9EDnSsR021542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-14 09:49:27 EDT --- Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=880064 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 13:48:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141348.m9EDmTda021451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-14 09:48:28 EDT --- Ok looks good. The warnings are ok. Please follow the procedure to request cvs described here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:14:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141414.m9EEEvBh028585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-14 10:14:56 EDT --- thanks for asking. Definitely I like to co-maintainer/maintainer for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:16:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141416.m9EEGWN6026479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 10:16:31 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. So, other than the license tag and the BR issue, looks pretty good. I'd like to see at least one more practice review, and I'll take a look at the one you linked to. FIX. License tag should be GPLv2+ - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NEEDINFO I have questions. Does the build process really use both versions of qt? Better to BR the version it actually uses, and modify the spec or use ifdef if the version it uses varies between rawide, F-9, F-8. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141424.m9EEOkk0031356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #7 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-14 10:24:45 EDT --- Enabling FreeIPMI support would IPMItool possibility to talk to local devices, that are supported by the FreeIPMI driver. But FreeIPMI package itself already provides IPMItool-like utility and there is no need to use IPMItool, that's why I decided to disable it. In addition to above, I added 'Provides: OpenIPMI-tools = 2.0.14-3' to make rpmlint happy. You can find new .spec and .srpm at http://people.redhat.com/jsafrane/ipmitool/2/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:39:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246368] Review Request: pbbuttonsd - hotkeys, power management, and keyboard backlight for Apple laptops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141439.m9EEd02C032362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246368 Gabriel Somlo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Somlo 2008-10-14 10:38:58 EDT --- This package is ppc specific, and there are potential solutions that would accomplish this functionality in a cross-platform way (hald, pommed, etc). Since I'm no longer using a ppc laptop, I don't want to commit to maintaining this package should it make it into fedora, so I'm closing this bug. If anyone cares about pbbuttonsd and wants it in fedora for ppc, please feel free to re-submit a review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:46:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141446.m9EEk97V006029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-14 10:46:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-te Short Description: Telugu hunspell dictionary Owners: pnemade Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:55:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141455.m9EEtZAE004706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 10:55:33 EDT --- [limb at fawkes fedora]$ diff ipmitool.spec ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/ipmitool.spec 11c11 < BuildRequires: openssl-devel readline-devel ncurses-devel --- > BuildRequires: openssl-devel readline-devel ncurses-devel freeipmi-devel Which is the one I should be using? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:52:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:52:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141452.m9EEqEh0003786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 10:52:12 EDT --- In addition to #2, I would add: The the license looks more like BSD than GPL. Desktop file is handled incorrectly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop That's just a cursory look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141451.m9EEprDH003672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 10:51:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Practice review 1: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 See my comments there. It's helpful, especially when you're first learning to review, to paste the MUST section of the review guidlines and go though point by point, like I bit. There may be things you find that aren't strictly under any particular MUST, but it's a great place to start. One or two more reviews, a license tag fix, and the BR question and we're set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 14:57:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141457.m9EEvOwa009108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-14 10:57:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-mongrel New Branches: EL-4 Owners: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141503.m9EF3hRK007029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 11:03:41 EDT --- Also, a mock build indicates no BuildRequire problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141526.m9EFQaBl014365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 11:26:35 EDT --- rpmlint clean. Why e16-keyedit and not e16keyedit? Just matching the existing packages? This should really have a .desktop file, and does not. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop Otherwise, looks good on full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:28:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141528.m9EFScYQ018490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-14 11:28:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sympy Short Description: A Python library for symbolic mathematics Owners: konradm Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:28:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141528.m9EFSxJ3014928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:38:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141538.m9EFcPfs021074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-14 11:38:24 EDT --- Thanks for the patches; new urls: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4-0.3.RC3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 15:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141557.m9EFvQfU026729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mmaslano at redhat.com |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #19 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-14 11:57:24 EDT --- Hello Pat, (In reply to comment #17) > I am indeed ready to do the review; great! Thanks a lot. Marcela (the current asisignee) agrees, so I'm re-assigning the bug to you. > But I really dislike epochs too. yep. > # the version is against the guidelines. However adherence to > # the guideline would imply using an epoch, which is very inconvenient. > # Given that this package is very slowly moving, and hoping that > # upstream skip one version to go straight to 0.47, it seems better > # not to use an epoch. If 0.46 is ever released, the epoch way would have > # to be used, but we are better avoiding that if possible. > > That seems to me to be a better argumentation ;-) Very nice and clear, thanks. What about the following small change, though? s/this package is very slowly moving/this package's development is stalled since Sep 1999/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141604.m9EG4Rvb025319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #20 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 12:04:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Very nice and clear, thanks. What about the following small change, though? > > s/this package is very slowly moving/this package's development is stalled > since Sep 1999/ No problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:13:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141613.m9EGD7hf031075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #13 from G?ran Uddeborg 2008-10-14 12:13:05 EDT --- After a little delay, here is my next try. I have - given cmpf and dmpf a ttf2pt1 prefix, - moved the additional scripts from the "other" directory to /usr/bin, also with a ttf2pt1 prefix, and - gone through the documentation and tried to adjust all occurrences of paths or script names to match what they have been renamed to or moved to (or both). Spec: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1.spec SRPM: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1-3.4.4-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141616.m9EGGVnu028989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #21 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-14 12:16:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > But to my surprise Parag doesn't seems to be in CC. Here is what I see in the history: Parag was willing to do the review, but after half year of no reactions he gave up and assigned the review back to nobody. At that time he might has added himself to cc but he hasn't; it seems natural at that situation and I'm not sure if he were happy if I added him to cc now. I hope he won't mind if we finish the review without dragging him in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141619.m9EGJCgx032438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 12:19:10 EDT --- No problem, we just should be sure to let the review opened something like a day after the approval such that he has time to put a comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:19:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141619.m9EGJ0DR029348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #7 from James Ralston 2008-10-14 12:18:59 EDT --- Based on upstream's response, I think removing demo.py and test.py from %{buildroot} is the best thing to do. E.g.: %install %{__rm} -fr %{buildroot} %{__python} setup.py install --root %{buildroot} %{__rm} %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/demo.py* %{__rm} %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/test.py* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:21:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141621.m9EGLdoV030002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #7 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-14 12:21:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > OK, that looks fine. > > A couple of minor comments: > > 1. Please bump the release number of the package every time you make a change > that anyone else (e.g. a reviewer) will see; this removes a possible source of > confusion about which version of a package any particular comment applies to, > and once you're building packages in Fedora, will ensure that packages you > build and subsequently release are consistent with any that people may build > locally from CVS. Certainly. > 2. I find it aids readability to append a "/" to directories included in > %files lists, just to emphasize that they are directories (which in many cases > will include further files, though that's not the case here), e.g. > dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Net/ Fair enough - one character for better readability can't hurt. > APPROVED. > > Let me know your account name in the Fedora Account System and I'll sponsor you > for membership of the Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group. Account name is "dbn". Hopefully I have all that stuff set up appropriately. Please let me know if there are any hiccups with the account. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:49:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141649.m9EGnFCg003615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Comment #9 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-14 12:49:14 EDT --- http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font-20020502-1.el5.src.rpm http://eva.fit.vutbr.cz/~xnowak01/Fedora/unikurd-web/unikurd-web-font.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141652.m9EGqj2J008587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-14 12:52:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unikurd-web-font Short Description: A widely used Kurdish font Owners: mnowak Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225970] Merge Review: kernel-xen-2.6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141654.m9EGsQNZ008889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225970 Chris Lalancette changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |clalance at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette 2008-10-14 12:54:25 EDT --- The kernel-xen-2.6 tree is very close to it's last legs; it's still open for F-8 and F-9 guests, but all of the relevant functionality has been merged into upstream Linux via pv_ops. We don't need to merge, so I'm going to close this out as CURRENTRELEASE. Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:54:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141654.m9EGsQbI008920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis at poolshark.org --- Comment #3 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-14 12:54:25 EDT --- Since I work at Sun, I can try to mediate this issue. The word I'm getting here is that Sun uses patents defensively only (on patent claims against Sun products). Sun would never do patent claims against Linux. ZFS has porting and integration effort in Mac OS X and Windows, and there is no patent agreement between the parties because it is not necessary if you're reusing Sun's work under the terms of the code license, not "reimplementing" ZFS or a different filesystem that's very similar to ZFS... If you have more specific questions, I can track down an authoritative answer from the powers-that-be over here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:54:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226554] Merge Review: xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141654.m9EGsK5p004813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226554 Chris Lalancette changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |clalance at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette 2008-10-14 12:54:19 EDT --- The xen package has been in Fedora for quite some time, so I'm not sure what this is tracking. I'm going to close this out. Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 16:56:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225971] Merge Review: kernel-xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141656.m9EGuka7009700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225971 Chris Lalancette changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |clalance at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Chris Lalancette 2008-10-14 12:56:44 EDT --- kernel-xen was subsumed by kernel-xen-2.6, and everything in there was eventually pushed into the upstream kernel via pv_ops. I'm closing this out. Chris Lalancette -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 17:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226554] Merge Review: xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141709.m9EH9PJe008541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226554 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |dan at danny.cz Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE | --- Comment #2 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-14 13:09:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The xen package has been in Fedora for quite some time, so I'm not sure what > this is tracking. I'm going to close this out. It should remain open until someone will check the compliance with the Fedora guidelines. All original Fedora Core packages should go through "merge review". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 17:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141714.m9EHEmEG009856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 13:14:47 EDT --- Now closing as F-8/9 builds are successful and both packages are submitted on bodhi. When you think F-8/9 packages can be moved from testing to stable repositories, please edit the submitted requests on bodhi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 17:45:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141745.m9EHjXAR020960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #15 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-14 13:45:31 EDT --- Why exactly do you need to disable sse even for x86? The changes you make to filter_motion_est.c are illogical, but they are effective at suppressing the respective code (since this is not Darwin platform). The top-level Makefile helper config.mak defines a USE_MMX unless --disable-mmx. Does this make more sense? sed -i.checksse -e 's|ifndef __DARWIN__|if !defined(__DARWIN__) && defined(USE_MMX)|' mlt-config should be deprecated because pkg-config files are also supplied. However, I do have to convert mlt++ over to pkg-config. I will do that now for the next release. Also, I will check to make sure kdenlive does not use it. I'll consider removing mlt-config as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141811.m9EIB5hO026764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #5 from Randall Berry 2008-10-14 14:11:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SPECS/HamFax.spec SRPM URL: http://dp67.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/SRPMS/HamFax-0.6.4-2.fc9.src.rpm License tag fixed now listed as GPLv2+. BR requires both qt-devel and qt3-devel I removed qt4-devel from the BR list. I was able to successfully mock build this package in both f9 and rawhide (i386), f8 does fail to build. Currently searching for another package to review that has not already been reviewed or assigned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141808.m9EI8Onh026003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #4 from R P Herrold 2008-10-14 14:08:23 EDT --- Is the license entry correct? I see at: http://www.zeromq.org/start * October, 8th, 2008: ?MQ is LGPL'd from now on! LGPL version is available in the form of source code in Subversion at the moment. LGPL'd package is coming soon. but the spec file has: License: GPLv3+ -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:14:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466953] New: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Summary: Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-Utils/perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.7-1.src.rpm Description: NOCpulse provides application, network, systems and transaction monitoring, coupled with a comprehensive reporting system including availability, historical and trending reports in an easy-to-use browser interface. This package provides miscellaneous utility modules. Scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=880101 $ rpmlint perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.7-1.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint perl-NOCpulse-Utils-1.14.7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141822.m9EIM0vd029633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #23 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-14 14:21:59 EDT --- So I committed your version of the comment, removed || : from %check and verified that a scratch build finishes. Could you please look whether you see any unresolved problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141825.m9EIPK3D030232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141825.m9EIPB7F030204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141826.m9EIQdpT030240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:25:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141825.m9EIPZjv029846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:35:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141835.m9EIZ6fo032167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |msuchy at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |msuchy at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141840.m9EIe6lb000541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-14 14:40:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-moon Short Description: Moon activity for the sugar desktop Owners: bkearney Branches: F-10 InitialCC: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:56:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141856.m9EIuqnL003388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-14 14:56:51 EDT --- I think you'll need to apply for membership of the packager group in the account system and then I can approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 18:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141856.m9EIugXj002705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 14:56:40 EDT --- Ok, the package looks good. I can approve once I'm comfortable sponsoring, and the practice review you've done is moving me in that direction. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:07:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141907.m9EJ7orR005989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-14 15:07:49 EDT --- Still build optflags issue and mktemp issue: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=880082&name=build.log full koji ref: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=880079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141915.m9EJFwuv006877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #9 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-14 15:15:56 EDT --- I knew I'd forgotten something. Request should be there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:30:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141930.m9EJUJBj009851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #10 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-14 15:30:18 EDT --- OK you're sponsored now. When you make the CVS Admin request for adding this package, it's conventional for perl modules to add "perl-sig" as InitialCC: - this will mean that any bug reports get copied to fedora-perl-devel-list, where list members may be able to assist with fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141941.m9EJfUdc012299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-14 15:41:29 EDT --- mirrormanager-1.2.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mirrormanager-1.2.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452387] Review Request: netblox - A console-based, networked falling blocks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141950.m9EJo68t014004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452387 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limb at jcomserv.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 15:50:03 EDT --- rpmlint clean. Drop the explicit ncurses Requires, rpm will do it automatically. Despite being a console app, this could benefit from a .desktop file, see bombardier. netblox -R mentions the Forbidden Proper Noun. Probably should be patched to be more general, but it's your call, as Spot did indeed lift the Legal flag. Spot is still free to correct me on this, however. Mock build fails. Patch #7 (netris-0.52-pysiak1.diff): + /bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/netris-0.52-pysiak1.diff + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0 4 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file game.c.rej 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file inet.c.rej RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rqp5dT (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rqp5dT (%prep) Child returncode was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/netblox.spec'] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 316, in do raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode) Error: Command failed. See logs for output. # ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i386 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/netblox.spec'] LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED You should either re-diff the patch, or put this at the beginning of the spec as a temporary workaround: %define _default_patch_fuzz 2 Honestly, re-diffing would be better. Once fixed, mock builds are fine, no BuildRequire issues. Other than the Requires and patch fuzz issue, there are really no blockers after a full review. Since I see you need a sponsor, please do a few practice reviews and post links here. Once that's done satisfactorily, I'd be willing to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 19:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810141953.m9EJrSc4014729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-14 15:53:24 EDT --- OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK (md5sum c0d288a7b935e8b940b0b850ef135c95)- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. FAIL - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. FAIL - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) OK - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. FAIL - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. FAIL - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. Your package do not build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=880737 Beside this everything else looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 20:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] New: Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Summary: Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ville.skytta at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-remote.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-remote-0.4.0-3.fc9.src.rpm This plugin extends VDR's remote control capabilities, adding support for Linux input devices, keyboards (tty), TCP connections, and LIRC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 20:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142018.m9EKIJL6022014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-14 16:18:18 EDT --- Patched for the mktemp issue, still at a loss as to how to correct the optflags issue. Any suggestions? SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 20:45:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142045.m9EKjg0e029566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #23 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-10-14 16:45:40 EDT --- New upstream release: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini.spec http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/libMini-8.9-1.fc9.src.rpm > Could you make a script to repackage the source tarball from the vcs ? Taken care of by new upstream release. Should also address stability. > Why to bundle icons and images as %doc in the -devel package : > %doc README.html libMini.css libMini.ico libMini.jpg libMini.ppm ? They're used by README.html (and only by README.html) which has API documentation. > Why this directory is deleted ? > %{__rm} -rf mini/GL All it contains are copies of the OpenGL headers for platforms that don't have gl.h available. I took it out to ensure that it builds against headers in /usr/include/GL instead of mini/GL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 20:46:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142046.m9EKkcqU029263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #18 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-10-14 16:46:35 EDT --- Unfortunately, no snapshots. Just the 4.0 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 20:54:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142054.m9EKsOJL031721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #24 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-14 16:54:22 EDT --- There are spurious provides coming from examples: Provides: perl(MyHTML) perl(MyVisitor) rpmlint says: known issue: perl-XML-Grove.src: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: invalid-version 0.46alpha As said above both "perl(XML::Grove)" and "perl(XML::Grove) = 0.46" are generated. If this is problematic, like in that case th estring is never taken into account this should be acted upon, otherwise this may be ignored. perl-XML-Grove.noarch: E: useless-explicit-provides perl(XML::Grove) This is already a package dependency, so no problem: perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/visitor.pl perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) ls -l *gz* -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 27336 sept. 10 1999 XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 27336 oct. 14 12:13 XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz-cvs tarball timestamp was not kept. It is too late now, but please do it for the next time. match upstream 48bee70ae412bd6cf8ef302b6c68e24e XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz In summary, please remove the spurious provides and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 21:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142126.m9ELQbDB007363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #10 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-14 17:26:36 EDT --- Add this patch: --- ContextFreeSource2.1.orig/Makefile 2007-04-29 07:51:20.000000000 +0200 +++ ContextFreeSource2.1/Makefile 2008-10-14 23:12:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -102,8 +102,9 @@ # Rules # +OPTFLAGS = -03 CPPFLAGS += $(patsubst %,-I%,$(INC_DIRS)) -CPPFLAGS += -O3 +CPPFLAGS += $(OPTFLAGS) #CPPFLAGS += -ggdb $(OBJ_DIR)/%.o : %.cpp Aand change make CFLAGS+="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to make OPTFLAGS="%{optflags}" BTW: don't mix $ style and % style macros. This mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -m 755 cfdg %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/cfdg could be one line: install -D -m 755 cfdg %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/cfdg Add smp_flags to make. Very picky: -create. should be - Create. http://www.contextfreeart.org/index.html -> http://www.contextfreeart.org/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 21:28:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142128.m9ELSmKi006396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 --- Comment #12 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-14 17:28:46 EDT --- Ping? Is there anything which is stopping us from closing this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 22:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142211.m9EMBWrI017302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 --- Comment #4 from ZC Miao 2008-10-14 18:11:31 EDT --- Spec: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg.spec SRPM: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg-0.9.6-0.2.src.rpm Updated, * Tue Oct 14 2008 ZC Miao - 0.9.6-0.2 - Change to correct license - Requires GConf2 in pre/post/preun - permission of docs shoud be 644 - summary without dot f9 mock built successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 22:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142220.m9EMKwXG019514@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-14 18:20:56 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Instead of just replacing -03 with -02 in the Makefile, you should try to use the value of RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} as CFLAGS. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags In this case, you could use: make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps you should use 'install -p'. + You could consider adding CHANGES to %doc as it gives an indication of the direction the project is taking. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible OK - sources match upstream sources OK - package builds successfully xx - ExcludeArch is needed The upstream page (http://code.google.com/p/bunny-the-fuzzer/) says: "Bunny is currently known to support Linux, ... on IA32 and IA64 systems." One should note that IA64 is different from x86_64 or amd64. So it would be a good idea to cross-check whether IA64 has been mistakenly used to refer to x86_64 or amd64, and whether x86_64 or amd64 is supported or not. I think that x86_64 is supported since it seemed to work with gcc.x86_64. In case IA64 has been mistakenly used, we should ExcludeArch ia64, alongwith the other secondary architectures (ie., alpha, arm, s390, sparc) which might not be supported. OK - build dependencies correctly listed OK - no locales OK - no shared libraries OK - package is not relocatable OK - file and directory ownership OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - no header files OK - no static libraries OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no library files OK - -devel is not needed OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary OK - package builds in mock successfully OK - package builds on all supported architectures OK - package functions as expected OK - scriptlets are not needed OK - subpackages are not needed OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 22:52:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460727] Review Request: gnujump - A jumping game which is a clone of xjump In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142252.m9EMqAjY025802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460727 --- Comment #2 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-14 18:52:09 EDT --- Here is the corresponding backtrace from GDB: (gdb) backtrace #0 0x000000314fc32215 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x000000314fc33d83 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x000000314fc72928 in __libc_message () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x000000314fcfce77 in __fortify_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #4 0x000000314fcfacb0 in __chk_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #5 0x000000314fcfa049 in _IO_str_chk_overflow () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #6 0x000000314fc76a46 in _IO_default_xsputn_internal () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #7 0x000000314fc47fd2 in vfprintf () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #8 0x000000314fcfa0ed in __vsprintf_chk () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #9 0x000000314fcfa030 in __sprintf_chk () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #10 0x000000000040f852 in initGblOps () at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:34 #11 0x0000000000406335 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff2852b898) at main.c:73 (gdb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 22:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142252.m9EMqLDg028143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2008-10-14 18:52:21 EDT --- New version, added a desktop file and icon. Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openalchemist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openalchemist-0.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 14 23:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810142307.m9EN7ntl028877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-14 19:07:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided > in the spec URL. > 006430c9ee24d6645a10693c5a075c1722876e21 remoot-0.9.tar.gz tarball replaced, b94e5870308b366fafc9e9018edd6ac6 > ISSUES > 1. two have slipped in the Requires: perl line. Please replace it with > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) fixed, copy-and-paste error > 2. please use iconv (plus touch -r to preserve the timestamp) to fix this. it's > cosmetic but too easy to not fix it fixed > 3. The BR for perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) is useless. You are not using it. fixed > 3. Some of the "Requires" line are not needed either, rpmbuild peeks them > automatically. Your current version of the spec leads to: > [wolfy at wolfy2 tmp]$ rpm -qpR remoot-0.9-2.fc10.noarch.rpm fixed Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/remoot.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/remoot-0.9-3.fc9.src.rpm Scratch builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=881136 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 00:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150013.m9F0DGrX011338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Randall Berry 2008-10-14 20:13:15 EDT --- Practice Review: Checked vesrion 0.84 MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. Successful mock build in F9-i386 and Rawhide-i386 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig N/A. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) N/A. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 00:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150016.m9F0GOLp009378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #4 from Randall Berry 2008-10-14 20:16:23 EDT --- Correct missed Field: - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 00:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150019.m9F0Jmhj012590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #7 from Randall Berry 2008-10-14 20:19:46 EDT --- Second practice review: Bug URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 00:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] New: Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Summary: Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at marcbradshaw.co.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/sl/sl.spec SRPM URL: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/sl/sl-3.03-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: The sl (Steam Locomotive) command is a joke which displays a train on your terminal when you accidentally type 'sl' instead of 'ls' The sl package has been part of the dribble repo for some time, during review for the rpmfusion repo the licence issues were resolved[1] and the package should now be fine for inclusion in fedora. 1 - http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/001599.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 01:40:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150140.m9F1ehNU025594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |konrad at tylerc.org --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-14 21:40:42 EDT --- Version should follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Non-Numeric_Version_in_Release but otherwise looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 01:41:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150141.m9F1fKo0028364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |konrad at tylerc.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 01:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] New: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 Summary: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: john.e.anderson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec SRPM URL: http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: litmus is a WebDAV server test suite, which aims to test whether a server is compliant with the WebDAV protocol as specified in RFC2518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 02:28:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150228.m9F2Sa1U004306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-14 22:28:35 EDT --- Best to ask the lawyers, I suppose. But you did not answer the question of whether it requires ROM images or a copy of any legally protected firmware in order to run. Answer that and there may be no point in asking for a legal opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 02:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150231.m9F2VmhK002571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 02:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150231.m9F2VlZ6002546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-14 22:31:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBD-Multi Short Description: DB Proxy with failover and load balancing Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 02:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150231.m9F2VjGb005222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-14 22:31:44 EDT --- Also, and I hate to be an ass about this, but there are really better ways to go about this than submitting something you know to be questionable to an already overloaded review queue so that one of the already overloaded package reviewers can come through and to the legwork. Was a simple post to fedora-legal-list not sufficient to answer your questions about this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:07:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150307.m9F374ik011552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-14 23:07:03 EDT --- I am happy to see this package on Fedora, because this is well-known to Japanese Linux users ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150319.m9F3JZQl010442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-14 23:19:33 EDT --- The license seems to be CeCILL v1, which I know from very recent fedora-legal-list discussion has not been reviewed. Thus this will need to wait for legal review, but I can review the packaging. I could not download the source from the upstream web site. Of course, they protect the web site from directory listings and the URL in the spec gives no clues. Where did you manage to download the tarball? Other than not being able to download it, I see no problems with shipping the development bits if that's what you're willing to support. Your %description could use a period at the end. X can't check upstream source. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent (barring the two expected R complaints) * final provides and requires are sane: R-GeneR = 2.11.1-1.fc10 R-GeneR(x86-64) = 2.11.1-1.fc10 = /bin/sh R R >= 2.6.0 libR.so()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (R package registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:36:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150336.m9F3a0KH013171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Dan Nicholson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-14 23:35:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL Short Description: SSL support for Net::SMTP Owners: dbn Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150337.m9F3bOBw013332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-14 23:37:24 EDT --- Last time I sent an email to fedora-legal-list they never got it. I had to forward it to spot directly to get an answer (I'm not subscribed to the list). It's easy to *not* review this if you think it's too questionable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150343.m9F3hL24017001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #10 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-14 23:43:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320383) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320383) ghc-zlib.spec This is a rework of the spec file to correspond to the current packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150353.m9F3roMF015786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #11 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-14 23:53:49 EDT --- BTW, the ghc in F-9 can't build this yet, because it hasn't been brought up to date w.r.t. the current guidelines. We're working to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 03:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150352.m9F3qHAX018426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #25 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-14 23:52:16 EDT --- Ok. I will like to say only that I don't mind if anyone add me in CC to any package review. I will be happy to help them. But as you all see what happened here after I requested updated SRPM many times. So I gave up with conclusion no one cares here so why should I keep myself in CC also? Let me work on other reviews. As I am working on some other things please allow me to stay away from this review. I know Patrice will help this package to review. Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 04:25:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150425.m9F4PfLC024229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 00:25:40 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 04:25:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150425.m9F4PwJD021711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 04:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225855] Merge Review: gphoto2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150447.m9F4l1EQ027465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225855 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Jindrich Novy 2008-10-15 00:46:59 EDT --- Nope, everything seems to be fixed now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:17:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:17:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466863] Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150517.m9F5HYpi031587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466863 --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:17:33 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466863] Missing Review: pam_mount - A PAM module that can mount volumes for a user session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150517.m9F5HpHJ031644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466863 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:21:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150521.m9F5LYRc002672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:23:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150523.m9F5Nar5000566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:23:35 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:21:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150521.m9F5LEWA032591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:21:11 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150524.m9F5O6FP000718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:25:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150525.m9F5PlCZ003642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:25:46 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150525.m9F5PxCq003704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150528.m9F5SlNQ002100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:28:46 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150529.m9F5TFO0004421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:33:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150533.m9F5XS7w003199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:33:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150533.m9F5XFZe005374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:33:14 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150545.m9F5jMcv008297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-15 01:45:21 EDT --- Fixes: - Use _initrddir. - pre and post fixes. - Disable automatical startup. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol-1.273-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:50:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466742] Review Request: hunspell-te - Telugu hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150550.m9F5ol4V007743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466742 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-15 01:50:46 EDT --- built on koji. thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150552.m9F5qQ4R010107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #15 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 01:52:25 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 05:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 01:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150553.m9F5rBuE010190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:01:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150601.m9F6141f012151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 02:01:02 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnstracer-1.9-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:01:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150601.m9F61B9v012296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 02:01:10 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dnstracer-1.9-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:07:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150607.m9F67Rt9013651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 --- Comment #11 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-15 02:07:26 EDT --- unable to build the package due to "FAILED: BuildError: package ebnetd not in list for tag dist-{f10,{f9,f8}-updates-candidate}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:19:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150619.m9F6J1I6013886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 02:18:59 EDT --- Practice Review: [*] OK [x] Fail (see comment) [o] Not Applicable [?] Questions [*] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Comment: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [*] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [*] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. [*] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [*] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [*] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [*] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [*] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Comment: Upstream URL works, but no md5sum available [*] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Comment: Successful mock build on F9 i386, Rawhide 1386 run tested on F9 i386 [*] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 [*] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [o] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig.An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [o] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [*] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [*] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [*] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [*] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Comment: missing %{name} macro in Source0: URL %{name} macro is used consistently through out spec should be used here also. [*] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity.) [*] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [o] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [o] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [o] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [o] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [o] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [o] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [*] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [*] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [*] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:30:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150630.m9F6UWts018775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #8 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 02:30:31 EDT --- Yet another practice review. Bug URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150638.m9F6c2os018443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #13 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-15 02:38:01 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/Padre/perl-Padre-0.10-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:39:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150639.m9F6dWUx020640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #12 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-15 02:39:31 EDT --- You don't actually need to request an F-10 branch here; if you omit it you'll still get the devel branch for Rawhide that will eventually become F-10. There will be a mass branching of all packages shortly before F-10 goes gold to create an F-10 branch from what's currently in devel. The availability of early F-10 branching (which is what you've requested here) is targeted at packages for which major changes will be happening in the F-11 development period, so that those changes can get underway now in CVS without affecting what will be going into F-10. Having said that, it's not going to do any harm to have the F-10 branch earlier, and this package is unlikely to change before the mass branching happens. Just so you know... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:44:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150644.m9F6iHBd019734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 02:44:16 EDT --- One comment I forgot to mention. The Website URL appears to be a domain parker with pop-ups included. Is this correct or is this a temporary place holder for the website listed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:46:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150646.m9F6k55u022431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-15 02:46:04 EDT --- All issues fixed, package is APPROVED. But remove the "--add-category" parameter when calling desktop-file-install (category is already set in the dekstop file itself) before import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 06:54:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 02:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150654.m9F6s888021956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-15 02:54:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Padre Short Description: text editor aimed to be an IDE for Perl Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-10 rawhide InitialCC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 07:09:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150709.m9F79O3D027715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 --- Comment #9 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-15 03:09:14 EDT --- oops, I don't know what went wrong, but the srpm has old (=wrong) .spec file. I uploaded new .srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 07:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150734.m9F7YOnO001067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Akira TAGOH 2008-10-15 03:34:22 EDT --- there seems to be a delay. it's ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 07:41:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 03:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150741.m9F7fa7J032749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 --- Comment #3 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 03:41:33 EDT --- My Bad.. I forgot to check all packages and not just src.rpm. [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. griffith.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/bin/griffith /usr/share/griffith/lib/griffith griffith.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/man/pl/man1/griffith.1.gz griffith.i386: E: no-binary griffith-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:05:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150805.m9F85hsQ006448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 04:05:40 EDT --- Forgot to say that there is a dot missing at the end of %description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150803.m9F83x9r008258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 04:03:58 EDT --- The mail transcript should be directly in the package as asource, so Source2: http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/sl/sl-license-mail.txt would work, with cp and adding to %doc. I suggest removing the /bin/ and let the commands be searched on the path. You should use cp -p and install -p (for the manpage) to keep timestamps. Also I suggest doing something along: iconv -f iso-2022-jp README -t utf8 > README.conv README.conv && \ touch -c -r README && \ mv README.conv README Also the -f of rm is not needed, it is always the default in rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:24:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150824.m9F8OlHQ013787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #78 from Harshad RJ 2008-10-15 04:24:43 EDT --- Hoorray! I am very pleased to see this finally come through. I am still unable to actually see it my package list. Do you think a mirror would take this long to pick up the update? This was the command I used: yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey list scala* PS. I tried posting on the admin.fedoraproject.org page, but it gives me an internal error of some kind, hence posting here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150833.m9F8XNN6015790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #79 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 04:33:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #78) > I am still unable to actually see it my package list. Do you think a mirror > would take this long to pick up the update? This package has not been pushed to testing repository, now waiting for signing by rel-eng team. You can check the current status on: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scala-2.7.2-0.2.RC1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:38:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150838.m9F8cmed014612@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #4 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-10-15 04:38:47 EDT --- Thanks Pat, I assume you mean mv -f rather than rm -f and have incorporated the suggestions into a new revision. http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/sl/sl-3.03-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 08:55:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150855.m9F8tk7r020703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-15 04:55:44 EDT --- Yes,(In reply to comment #4) > Is the license entry correct? Yes. Although they mentioned about re-licensing ZeroMQ, this was made only for trunk (and therefore for future releases). This release, 0.3.2, is still under GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150952.m9F9qsNl029672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 05:52:53 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:51:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150951.m9F9pAU3029402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #8 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-10-15 05:51:09 EDT --- Done: Spec URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SPECS/globalplatform.spec SRPM URL: http://users.tuxed.net/fkooman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/globalplatform-5.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm I'll submit a review request for GPshell (which depends on globalplatform) shortly. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150953.m9F9rWAp032547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:56:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150956.m9F9uw0w030545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #38 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 05:56:58 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150959.m9F9xZLI030906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 --- Comment #16 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 05:59:32 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:57:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150957.m9F9vQsH000939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 09:59:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810150959.m9F9xqFT001334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:03:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151003.m9FA30pg031752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 06:02:59 EDT --- You dont seem to be sponsored yet. Setting the sponsor flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:09:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151009.m9FA9W3h000377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #13 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 06:09:31 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:06:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151006.m9FA6mrB002926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151009.m9FA9mkZ003223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:13:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151013.m9FAD23K004168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #54 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-15 06:13:01 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:13:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151013.m9FADGdf004238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:27:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466743] Review Request: hunspell-br - Breton hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151027.m9FARwBD007238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466743 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151039.m9FAdfxf006470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 06:39:39 EDT --- insight-6.8-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/insight-6.8-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 10:39:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 06:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151039.m9FAdj1u009665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 06:39:44 EDT --- insight-6.8-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/insight-6.8-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 11:01:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151101.m9FB1juR012099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-15 07:01:44 EDT --- Should be in F-10 perl-Padre-0.10-4.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 11:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151125.m9FBPXhq020730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-15 07:25:31 EDT --- * desktop-file-validate drascula.desktop drascula.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated * there are two optional addon pkgs for music and other languages * speech sound is a bit choppy (compression? scummvm problem?) * packaging-wise: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 11:40:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151140.m9FBeGum020455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-15 07:40:15 EDT --- I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 12:13:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151213.m9FCDouQ031672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #10 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-15 08:13:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > formal review is here, see the notes below: > > BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. Fixed > BAD compiler flags are appropriate. Fixed, -O0 was (and probably will be during early F11 cycle) temporary option because it makes core dumps more usable. > BAD scriptlets present Fixed > - rpmlint complains: > tightvnc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/tightvnc-1.5.0-svn2975/unix/xserver/*/*.[ch] (about 12 files) > run "chmod a-x unix/xserver/*/*.[ch]" after copying the xorg-x11-server-Xorg > sources into the tightvnc tree Fixed > > - the EVR in Obsoletes/Provides must be greater than the EVR of the package we > are replacing (use EVR=4.1.2-36, no dist tag) - see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages Fixed > > - server subpackage should have "Requires: xorg-x11-server-Xorg" for the > ownership of %{_libdir}/xorg/modules/extensions/ dependency on xorg-x11-server-Xorg doesn't seem so good for me so I moved libvnc.so module to server-module subpackage which requires xorg-x11-server-Xorg > - remove the X-Red-Hat-Extra from the desktop file Removed Updated sources: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc.spec http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc-1.5.0-0.5.20081015svn3019.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 12:24:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151224.m9FCOHWc001806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Petr Lautrbach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Petr Lautrbach 2008-10-15 08:24:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Daemon Short Description: Perl extension for portable daemons Owners: plautrba Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 12:57:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151257.m9FCvPRS006751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 08:57:23 EDT --- Well, while I does not have nVidia (I use intel), when I switch to vesa there does not seem to have any problem on this package. So for now I assume that there is something wrong with either X driver or mesa. So, @Tim if you have something you want to modify on your srpm would you do so and post on this bug the newest of URLs of your spec/srpm _anyway_ ? Then I will recheck your srpm again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151300.m9FD0K8c010633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 09:00:19 EDT --- Thanks, now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151310.m9FDAxTS010118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 09:10:56 EDT --- Wow, thanks, your suggestions are more details than some people's instructions. :) SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-4.fc9.src.rpm All addressed/applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:13:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151313.m9FDD6cM010449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #26 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-15 09:13:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > ls -l *gz* > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 27336 sept. 10 1999 XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 27336 oct. 14 12:13 XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz-cvs > tarball timestamp was not kept. It is too late now, but please do it > for the next time. Weird. My own copy of the file had the right time stamp when I issued make new-source FILES=XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz But it seems the upload process has crippled the time stamp. 2008-10-14 12:13:51 is the access time of the file on my disk, but I do not know if it is the time of download from upstream or the time of upload to fedora cvs. I think that this upload failed because I had not the ssh key in my ssh keyring at the moment. But in any case, it looks like a bug that "make upload" left things in an inconsistent state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151318.m9FDIIf4011666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-15 09:18:17 EDT --- Yet 2 little issues - the License tag should be GPLv2+ (sorry I missed that in the first round) - include instructions for getting the sources - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control (svn export https://vnc-tight.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/vnc-tight/trunk -r %{revision} tightvnc; tar czvf ...) And one suggestion - can you move this section cp -r %{_datadir}/xorg-x11-server-source/* unix/xserver pushd unix/xserver for all in `find . -type f -perm -001`; do chmod -x "$all" done patch -p0 < ../xserver.patch from %build to %prep, because this is in fact source preparation too. And last thing (not related to the review) could be refreshing the xserver.patch, because it applies quite unclean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151326.m9FDQAPX013905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #27 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-15 09:26:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) I said: > I think that this upload failed because I had not the ssh key in my ssh > keyring at the moment. This does not seem likely, the ssh key is used later, for "cvs update". > But in any case, it looks like a bug that "make upload" left > things in an inconsistent state. Indeed, it looks like a bug in update.cgi; don't you, by any chance, know against what component should the bug be filed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:35:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151335.m9FDZNeH018892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 09:35:22 EDT --- Awesome. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:35:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151335.m9FDZwhf018985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #14 from David Timms 2008-10-15 09:35:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > * rakarrack.desktop -> %{name}.desktop I looked at it and thought, maybe I should assign a variable to store the complete path to .desktop in. Do people normally do things like that ? Meanwhile I changed to point the spelt out path using %{name} > ? %{name} is a basic rack of effects for guitar... -> Rakarrack is a basic rack of effects for guitar... Overzealous search and replace. Fixed. > * This line needs to be in the %prep section: > %configure --docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} > --htmldir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} I'm learning more about make configure and so on, thanks for these pointers. > * These lines need to be in the %prep section too: > %{__sed} -i 's/Icon=icono_rakarrack_128x128/Icon=rakarrack/' > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop > %{__sed} -i 's/Guitar Effects Processor/Real-time audio effects processing > rack for guitar/' %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop > echo "GenericName=Digital audio effects processor" >> > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop > echo "Version=1.0" >> %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/rakarrack.desktop Moved. > You may need to change the "%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications/" to "data/" Correct, and done. > Basically, the %build section is for building/compiling, %install section is > to install the software into %{buildroot}. Everything else that can be done > before coming to these sections must be done in %prep. First I've heard of it, but makes complete sense, as long as the build doesn't build the icons / desktop files during make etc on the fly. > * %doc AUTHORS README > %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/COPYING > %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/html > > This has problems. Now there are two document directories created: > /usr/share/doc/rakarrack /usr/share/doc/rakarrack-0.2.0 > You only need one document directory. COPYING and html needs to go into %doc > (which is /usr/share/doc/rakarrack-0.2.0). > What you have to do is to make the program point onto the correct document > directory when you click on the Help->contents button. You may need to hack Thanks for the sed hack. In the end I still had to manually move the files to the doc-versioned dir so that rpm and the app finds these things as expected. It seems that this is an issue with some part of the source, ie the passed --docdir and --htmldir are not properly used during configure, make and install. I am not sure what causes the html+COPYING files to end up in a non-versioned doc dir, otherwise I would send a patch upstream. > So you decided to not add a new category? I'd say that would be convenient for > people dealing with audio software. :) I wanted to, and a response from Matthias on f-packaging suggests it is OK, as long as they are in addition to the standard categories, and prepended with X-. Done. Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec New .src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm - move non-install commands to setup - fix configure .ini so that standard help path will be used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151349.m9FDnT15019059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #28 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 09:49:28 EDT --- I am missing something, isn't the file in the lookaside cache since a long time now? Subsequente make upload won't change the timestamp. In fact I guess that it was automatically imported, or something like that, during the marge from the old Red Haat internal buildsystem. Anyway it isn't important, just fix the Provides and we're done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151349.m9FDnWgr022093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 09:49:30 EDT --- Corrections. License tag should be GPLv2+. Minor correction to desktop file handling, alter the vendor tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop a la: --vendor="" Otherwise, no major issues with the review or package. Randall, once you're sponsored, you can take ownership, verify the fixes and approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:58:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151358.m9FDwtlm024371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-15 09:58:54 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 13:59:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 09:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151359.m9FDxuOk024593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #29 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-15 09:59:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > There are spurious provides coming from examples: > > Provides: perl(MyHTML) perl(MyVisitor) indeed. So it seems the messages were almost right: > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl > perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/visitor.pl > perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) Had it mentioned perl(MyHTML) and perl(MyVisitor), respectively, the messages would have named the problem. But the "rpmlint -i" hint says that it helps to clear the exec bit of the files. This is not true, the bit is cleared, yet the dependency generator brings in the wrong provides. Should I fight against the dependency generator somehow? gzipping the examples, rot13-encoding, renaming them, clearing the #! line or whatever... ??? Or is it enough to file a bug aginst the buggy dependency generator? To sum up, I still apply for the approval of the package in its current state in the cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467051] New: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051 Summary: Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arp-scan/arp-scan.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arp-scan/arp-scan-1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: arp-scan sends ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) queries to the specified targets, and displays any responses that are received. It allows any part of the outgoing ARP packets to be changed, allowing the behavior of targets to non-standard ARP packets to be examined. The IP address and hardware address of received packets are displayed, together with the vendor details. These details are obtained from the IEEE OUI and IAB listings, plus a few manual entries. It includes arp-fingerprint, which allows a system to be fingerprinted based on how it responds to non-standard ARP packets. arp-scan is very useful if you want to migrate a network to use DHCP -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151402.m9FE2udr022591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 10:02:54 EDT --- Comments on practice review: >[x] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros > section of Packaging Guidelines. > > Comment: missing %{name} macro in Source0: URL %{name} macro is used > consistently through out spec should be used here also. This particular case is more of a convenience, not a necessity. In fact, sometimes I see macros overused, like %{version} in patch name, which must then be hard-coded or renamed if the patch is valid over multiple versions, but this is not the case here. >One comment I forgot to mention. The Website URL appears to be a domain parker >with pop-ups included. Is this correct or is this a temporary place holder for >the website listed? README gives http://www.griffith.cc, which is much better. >[*] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop > file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install > in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files > section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI > application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the > spec file with your explanation. Actually, this is not *quite* correctly handled: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop Otherwise, a good review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:06:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:06:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151406.m9FE68T6026554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #30 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-15 10:06:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > I am missing something, isn't the file in the lookaside cache since a long time > now? No, it isn't; the file in cvs has yesterday's time stamp: > -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 27336 oct. 14 12:13 XML-Grove-0.46alpha.tar.gz-cvs and I imported that file yesterday. And I did the import yesterday, using the originial tar.gz, dowloaded from upstream, with the right 1999 time stamp. But the upload command (upload.cgi, called from "make new-source") screwed the time stamp. I do not know why. I agree with you that there is no known way to fix the time stamp now. I think that the bug in upload.cgi which caused that, should be reported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:09:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151409.m9FE91w5023879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #31 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 10:09:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #28) > > I am missing something, isn't the file in the lookaside cache since a long time > > now? > > No, it isn't; the file in cvs has yesterday's time stamp: I forgot about the .tar.gz vs .tar.bz2. > I think that the bug in upload.cgi which caused that, should be reported. I guess that the best location would be the trac of the infrastructure team. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151415.m9FEFPYE025843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151413.m9FEDJu9025039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 10:13:18 EDT --- Given the reviews you've completed, and our email exchange, I'm comfortable that you've got a good and improving grasp of the Packaging Guidelines and review process. I've sponsored your FAS account, APPROVED your package, and you're ready to request cvs branching, import, and build. I'd recommend devel (required, and no need to request) and F-9 branches. You can also take ownership of the reviews you did, verify that the changes get made, and approve them when ready. Feel free to shoot questions my way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467051] Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151415.m9FEFMYd029162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Alias| |arp-scan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:16:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:16:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151416.m9FEGPOX026139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #32 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 10:16:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > (In reply to comment #24) > > There are spurious provides coming from examples: > > > > Provides: perl(MyHTML) perl(MyVisitor) > > indeed. So it seems the messages were almost right: > > > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/my-html.pl > > perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) > > > perl-XML-Grove.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency > > /usr/share/doc/perl-XML-Grove-0.46alpha/examples/visitor.pl > > perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) No, unless I am wrong it is about Requires, not about Provides, and I thing that it is harmless since those Requires are Provided by the package or are also a Requires for the package. > Had it mentioned perl(MyHTML) and perl(MyVisitor), respectively, the messages > would have named the problem. > > But the "rpmlint -i" hint says that it helps to clear the exec bit of the > files. > This is not true, the bit is cleared, yet the dependency generator brings in > the wrong provides. The perl dependencies generator doesn't take into account the exec bit since .pm are not executables in general. > Should I fight against the dependency generator somehow? gzipping the examples, > rot13-encoding, renaming them, clearing the #! line or whatever... ??? I don't think so. > Or is it enough to file a bug aginst the buggy dependency generator? The bug I see is that rpmlint should say that perl(MyHTML) and perl(MyVisitor) are doc file Provides dependencies, I don't see a bug in the dependency generator. And the rpmlint explanation is untrue, but rpmlint cannot know about all dependency generators, especially those that are customized. > To sum up, I still apply for the approval of the package in its current state > in the cvs. The perl(MyHTML) and perl(MyVisitor) provides should be removed. They are bogus provides, even though rpmlint doesn't find them... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151424.m9FEO64K031033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 10:24:05 EDT --- The timestamp of the source archive is not kept: -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 20480 juil. 22 1999 sl.tar -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 20480 f?vr. 13 2008 ../SOURCES/sl.tar Otherwise seems ok to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:29:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151429.m9FETGNU029314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 10:29:15 EDT --- Forgot one thing. In general I think that it is pretty bad to use a two letter command, since the number of two letter command names is scarce and they should be used wisely. However in that case I think that the name is not really taken since sl could just go if something serious wants the command name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151438.m9FEcqvH031986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-15 10:38:50 EDT --- * -devel pkg description still mentions static libs - fix this * gfortran build does not use our global $FFLAGS, but -g -O2 * Hint: Include manual pages as '*' or 'foo*' but drop the 'gz' because the rpmbuild compressor for man pages may change. * Why not include the AUTHORS and TODO files as %doc? * a shorter tar.bz2 release is available * a detached signature is available for the source tarballs - consider uploading and including them in fedora pkg cvs "sources" files Minor things which can be fixed in pkg cvs. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:44:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151444.m9FEitLK001196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 --- Comment #2 from Colin Walters 2008-10-15 10:44:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review. On the version numbering, I was wrong in our IRC discussion. The main upstream version is 20080916 - it's not an SVN snapshot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:45:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151445.m9FEjOYM005169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #33 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-15 10:45:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320442) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320442) Patch to remove bogus deps and provides Here's a simple patch that removes the bogus provides for perl(MyHTML) and perl(Visitor), the unversioned perl(XML::Grove) provide (leaving the versioned one), and the doc file dependencies that rpmlint complains about. It also switches the position of the "-depth" option in a "find" command to the start of the command, a style thing that I just can't seem to help myself fixing wherever I come across it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 14:54:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151454.m9FEsRJq007347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #34 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 10:54:26 EDT --- I don't think that the perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) requires should be removed, it is really required (unless I am wrong), not only by a doc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:04:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151504.m9FF4vb2006713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #35 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-15 11:04:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > I don't think that the perl(XML::Parser::PerlSAX) requires should be > removed, it is really required (unless I am wrong), not only by a doc > file. Hmm, you're right, it's used by XML::Grove and XML::Grove::Subst. I wonder why rpmlint had it down as a doc file dependency then? So the requires filter isn't needed at all then, which simplifies things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:15:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151515.m9FFFRgm009956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 11:15:26 EDT --- Some notes for -4: * License - Please write explicitly from which you borrowed the license text in the spec file (and also in sl.COPYRIGHT) as comments. Perhaps it is from: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/sl/sl_3.03-15.diff.gz * defattr - We now recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * manfile - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151520.m9FFKTiW014457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 11:20:28 EDT --- gromacs-4.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gromacs-4.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:33:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151533.m9FFXheg014543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 11:33:41 EDT --- One more thing: * %dist tag - Please remove %dist tag from %changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:32:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151532.m9FFW8hp017157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 11:32:07 EDT --- gromacs-4.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gromacs-4.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151534.m9FFYlGd017585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 11:34:46 EDT --- gromacs-4.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gromacs-4.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:34:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151534.m9FFYl6d017601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 11:34:46 EDT --- Well, this package itself is now good, so now I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151542.m9FFgwSE019784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 11:42:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: HamFax Short Description: An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. Owners: dp67 Branches: F-9, F-10 InitialCC: dp67 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:54:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151554.m9FFsUJi019557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #58 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-15 11:54:28 EDT --- Sorry for the spams about updates. Had to fight a bit with Bodhi to get the package included; the additional builds thingy in web bodhi doesn't seem to work, it only picks one of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151600.m9FG07cX024470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Robert 'Bob' Jensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob at fedoraunity.org --- Comment #11 from Robert 'Bob' Jensen 2008-10-15 12:00:06 EDT --- Way To Go Randy. Thanks a lot Jon for sponsoring Randy, he has been a valuable member of our Amateur Radio SIG already, packaging will make him even more so. Good work guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151554.m9FFst0b022603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-15 11:54:54 EDT --- Then that's perfectly acceptable. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 15:54:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151554.m9FFsurd022649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151613.m9FGDQ1X028015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-15 12:13:25 EDT --- NP, the more the merrier. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151619.m9FGJZ9M029053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-15 12:19:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * there are two optional addon pkgs for music and other languages will add music to the package, without game seems incomplete (eg. piano playing) as for languages addon, from scummvm's point of view every language is another version of the game (needs to be added separately to scumm or have separate desktop entry). Now I can either add all those languages to the main package (and create separate desktop entries for each) or create separate package for each language (5) that will require the main package. > * speech sound is a bit choppy (compression? scummvm problem?) yes, I believe it is a compression problem. > * packaging-wise: APPROVED Thank you -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:28:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151628.m9FGSMs0027985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #36 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-15 12:28:20 EDT --- OK, I incorporated Paul's changes. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151624.m9FGOAqn027041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-15 12:24:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drascula Short Description: Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151617.m9FGHL7Y025591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #12 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-15 12:17:20 EDT --- All problems should be fixed: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc-1.5.0-0.6.20081015svn3021.fc10.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151702.m9FH2vjF002427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:02:55 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:48:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151648.m9FGmUJh031969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-15 12:48:28 EDT --- All issues are resolved and this package is APPROVED. Great work, Adam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151640.m9FGeeNu030772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 --- Comment #13 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-15 12:40:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > All problems should be fixed: > > http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc-1.5.0-0.6.20081015svn3021.fc10.src.rpm > http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc.spec Well, SRPM written above is broken, updated one is: http://people.redhat.com/atkac/tightvnc-1.5.0-0.7.20081015svn3022.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151640.m9FGeK25030649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 12:40:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151740.m9FHelQL011465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:40:46 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 18:25:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151825.m9FIPa6B023100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-15 14:25:35 EDT --- Apologies on the delay here, this one totally fell off my radar. This package is now approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 18:16:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151816.m9FIGo6c021591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-15 14:16:49 EDT --- Well, for -4: * installed files - Well, currently * sybasect.so * Sybase.py are not installed, which is apparently wrong (is this rpm really working for you?) As far as I checked this code, replacing the line "python setup.py install ...." by -------------------------------------------------------- python setup.py install --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -------------------------------------------------------- correctly installs these files. Also with this change the following "rm $PYTHONPATH/site.*" line is not needed. * General rpmlint issue -------------------------------------------------------- python-sybase.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-sybase-0.39/doc/pstumble python-sybase.i386: E: version-control-internal-file /usr/share/doc/python-sybase-0.39/doc/.cvsignore -------------------------------------------------------- - Usually all files installed as %doc must have 0644 permission (and should not have executable permission) - .cvsignore file is not needed. Also I am waiting for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151921.m9FJLO8B002977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Lutterkort 2008-10-15 15:21:23 EDT --- Looks good now APPROVED Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVSAdminProcedure and import the package. Close this bug as RAWHIDE once it's been successfully imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:37:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151937.m9FJbnWM006578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 --- Comment #1 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 15:37:48 EDT --- The Spec URL is not working. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447740] Review Request: zypper - easy to use command line package manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151939.m9FJdp3d007242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447740 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:45:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151945.m9FJjSV6008423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 15:45:27 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:43:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151943.m9FJhKHG008002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #26 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-15 15:43:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev > 3468) > > be OK for this package? Actually, shouldn't it be pymol-1.1-5.3419svn ? Or, if this is more a prerelease of 1.2 than a release of the 1.1 series, then pymol-1.2-0.1.3419svn . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151949.m9FJnZHE008901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from David Lutterkort 2008-10-15 15:49:34 EDT --- OK - Package name OK - License info is accurate OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved OK - License files are installed as %doc OK - Specfile name OK - Specfile is legible OK - No prebuilt binaries included OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values) OK - PreReq not used OK - Source md5sum matches upstream FIX - No hardcoded pathnames mentions /etc/pam.d, use %_sysconfdir OK - Package owns all the files it installs OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories OK - Package builds successfully on i386 and x86_64 (mock) OK - BuildRequires sufficient OK - File permissions set properly OK - Macro usage is consistent FIX - rpmlint is silent NIT - lots of tabs lead to goofy indentation; remove tabs I get the following from rpmlint: ace-console-wui.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/db/development.sqlite3 ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/config/environments/production.rb /etc/ace-console-wui/production.rb ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/config/environments/test.rb /etc/ace-console-wui/test.rb ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/config/database.yml /etc/ace-console-wui/database.yml ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/config/environments/development.rb /etc/ace-console-wui/development.rb ace-console-wui.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/tmp /var/lib/%{inst_name}/tmp ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/tmp /var/lib/%{inst_name}/tmp ace-console-wui.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ace-console-wui ace-console-wui} Either fix them or explain why they are ok to keep. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454997] Review Request: ircii - Popular Unix Irc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152007.m9FK7Viq012602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454997 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 16:07:30 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152015.m9FKFGsF014199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 16:15:15 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:14:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152014.m9FKECSB013736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 16:14:10 EDT --- I think this review is dead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:18:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152018.m9FKIAYS014657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 16:18:09 EDT --- perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:20:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152020.m9FKKVZq015262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 --- Comment #15 from Dan Nicholson 2008-10-15 16:20:31 EDT --- Ah, too bad about the F-10 branch. I thought the branching had already happened with the F-10 beta, but I should have looked more closely. Anyway, I've submitted builds for F-9, F-10 and F-11. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66466 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66463 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=66462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:20:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152020.m9FKKCpJ015188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #37 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-15 16:20:09 EDT --- Everything is right now. APPROVED. One minor thing, I think that /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/XML/DOM-ecmascript.pod should be labelled as %doc, but also that it should be automatic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:18:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152018.m9FKIeLs014739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 16:18:39 EDT --- It has been two months since the review was submitted, but no Spec or SRPM has been provided. Please provide URLs to a Spec/SRPM pair as soon as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152033.m9FKX6hW017509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152035.m9FKZvXE018036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |debarshi.ray at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:32:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458773] Review Request: geany-vc - Provide uniform access to different version-control systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152032.m9FKWXDj017443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458773 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|debarshi.ray at gmail.com | --- Comment #6 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 16:32:33 EDT --- Sorry, I missed those attachments. Please consider following the template (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review) as mentioned by Paul in future. Are you sponsored? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/packager does not mention a sponsor against your name. If you are not sponsored then please follow: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 20:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152047.m9FKllmh019979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com --- Comment #30 from Andrew Overholt 2008-10-15 16:47:43 EDT --- I need to update the packaging guidelines for Eclipse plugins to say put things in either %{_libdir}/eclipse/dropins//{plugins,features} or %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins//{plugins,features}. I'll take this review. Rob, care to review Eclemma when I update it to reflect the new guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152105.m9FL5Da6023166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-15 17:05:12 EDT --- Correct the following things: - Add license for data to License field. - Add pygtk2 to Requires as openalchemist-config uses it. - Remove duplicate files: leave one of COPYING and CODE-LICENSE. Remove licenses from datadir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:09:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:09:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446563] Review Request: rubygem-rspec - Behaviour Driven Development framework for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152109.m9FL9nxY023533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446563 Casey Dahlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cdahlin at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Casey Dahlin 2008-10-15 17:09:48 EDT --- You need the ruby(abi) requires and the ruby buildrequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458254] Review Request: fedora-package-config-zypper - Repository configuration for zypper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152112.m9FLCqJN024406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458254 --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-10-15 17:12:50 EDT --- New SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=system/fedora-package-config-zypper/fedora-package-config-zypper.spec;hb=HEAD New SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/fedora-package-config-zypper-9-1.fc10.src.rpm Please note that, AFAIK, zypper does not support $releasever variable in .repo files, the release number is hardcoded in the .repo files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152141.m9FLfbvS029647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #16 from David Timms 2008-10-15 17:41:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > The variable HELPDIR should normally pick up the --htmldir flag you pass to > configure. But for some reason they put a hardcoded path for HELPDIR which > confused us in the beginning. But make sure you let the upstream know about > these problems. Will do. > * You won't need this line twice. Once (before %configure) is just fine: > %{__sed} -i > 's|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}"|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}-%{version}"|' configure.in In trying to get html/helpdir to work, I thought the sed changes may have been failing, or overwritten before the make. Unfortunately I left my debug cruft in the spec ;-|, now gone. > * When submitting your final version, make sure you remove the commands you > commented out that are not relevant. For instance: done. it was getting late, and I was keen to have something published so that my progress could be reviewed. > * Careful! : > #%%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/COPYING > --> #%%{_datadir}/doc/%%{name}/COPYING > Well you will need to completely remove this line anyways. But keep in mind > that having a macro in a comment with a single % is enough reason to not > approve a package. I know the rules are very strict but it is those rules that > make fedora consistent. :) Did it again :(. Actually, this check could possibly be performed by rpmlint -> fail bad specs. I'll take that up with it's upstream. Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec New .src.rpm: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc9.src.rpm - del debug cruft left in the spec while trying to solve issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:49:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152149.m9FLnmvn030795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Clint Savage changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Clint Savage 2008-10-15 17:49:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: darkice Short Description: Live audio streamer Owners: herlo Branches: F-9, F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:54:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:54:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152154.m9FLsNqe031661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 17:54:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:53:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152153.m9FLrSTa031642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 17:53:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:56:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152156.m9FLuG63032275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 17:56:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:59:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152159.m9FLxXoG032653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-15 17:59:31 EDT --- Blocking FE-Legal until I have time to look into this properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 21:59:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152159.m9FLx8La032677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 17:59:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:04:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 421871] Review Request: libvirt-cim - A CIM provider for libvirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152204.m9FM4B0J001333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=421871 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 18:04:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:00:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152200.m9FM0wbv000951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 18:00:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456038] Review Request: DarkIce - Live Audio Streamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152202.m9FM2EG9001309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456038 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 18:02:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254015] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel - A small fast HTTP library and server for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152203.m9FM3J9r001433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254015 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-15 18:03:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152212.m9FMCkkb003310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #53 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-15 18:12:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: NetworkManager-openvpn New Branches: EL-5 New branch owner: lkundrak Christoph H?ger: "I do not use a RHEL Desktop and do not have any experience with EPEL I would propably do a bad job maintaining it. So I think it's better if you take the maintainership for EPEL." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:32:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463226] Review Request: Appliance Configuration Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151932.m9FJWmTN005308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463226 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-15 15:32:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ace Short Description: Appliance Configuration Engine Owners: bkearney Branches: F-9 F10 InitialCC: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151930.m9FJUVHx005567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #8 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-15 15:30:30 EDT --- I have been sponsored. Copying CVS Request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-moon Short Description: Moon activity for the sugar desktop Owners: bkearney Branches: F-10 InitialCC: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:03:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151903.m9FJ3dlT032668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #25 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-15 15:03:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Well, while I does not have nVidia (I use intel), when I switch > to vesa there does not seem to have any problem on this package. > So for now I assume that there is something wrong with > either X driver or mesa. > > So, @Tim if you have something you want to modify on your srpm > would you do so and post on this bug the newest of URLs of your spec/srpm > _anyway_ ? Then I will recheck your srpm again. I bumped my SVN rev to 3468, and according to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251#c21, it seems like its a candidate release package. So, going by https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines, would a name like: pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev 3468) be OK for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151902.m9FJ2H4G032185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-15 15:02:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) * > (In reply to comment #11) > > * rakarrack.desktop -> %{name}.desktop > I looked at it and thought, maybe I should assign a variable to store the > complete path to .desktop in. Do people normally do things like that ? > I don't think you need that. The way it is is fine. * > In the end I still had to manually move the files to the doc-versioned dir so > that rpm and the app finds these things as expected. > It seems that this is an issue with some part of the source, ie the passed > --docdir and --htmldir are not properly used during configure, make and > install. > I am not sure what causes the html+COPYING files to end up in a non-versioned > doc dir, otherwise I would send a patch upstream. Yes I noticed that. The problem is in the docdir definitions in doc/Makefile.am and doc/Makefile.in files. But sed'ding them is not recommended because then you will need to run autoconf tools which might result in different configure&Makefiles depending on the autoconf version. I think your workaround (moving the files manually) is just fine until a fix comes from upstream. The variable HELPDIR should normally pick up the --htmldir flag you pass to configure. But for some reason they put a hardcoded path for HELPDIR which confused us in the beginning. But make sure you let the upstream know about these problems. * > > Updated spec: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack.spec > New .src.rpm: > http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/rakarrack/rakarrack-0.2.0-4.fc9.src.rpm > > - move non-install commands to setup > - fix configure .ini so that standard help path will be used Great. Last remarks: * You won't need this line twice. Once (before %configure) is just fine: %{__sed} -i 's|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}"|HELPDIR="$prefix/share/doc/${PACKAGE}-%{version}"|' configure.in * When submitting your final version, make sure you remove the commands you commented out that are not relevant. For instance: #echo aftt:====== * Careful! : #%%{_datadir}/doc/%{name}/COPYING --> #%%{_datadir}/doc/%%{name}/COPYING Well you will need to completely remove this line anyways. But keep in mind that having a macro in a comment with a single % is enough reason to not approve a package. I know the rules are very strict but it is those rules that make fedora consistent. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:32:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151932.m9FJWPHV006071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #34 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-15 15:32:22 EDT --- MUST Items: OK - rpmlint is clean OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + The Source0 tag should have a valid URL pointing to the upstream release tarball. This is an important requirement. In case upstream does not provide any such tarball, the Spec should have a comment above the Source0 tag describing how the sources were obtained to create the package. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL + Could you throw some light on why it is a problem to build the language bindings on Fedora? Is it because of the ruby-rpm breakage in Rawhide? + Please do not strip the test-suite, if it is not absolutely necessary. Laziness arising out of needing to upload the SRPM several times is not a valid reason. :-) + It is not really necessary to create %{_target_platform}. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} + Please add a comment in the Spec to document the rationale for shipping static libraries. + You could consider shipping the other files in the doc/ sub-directory as %doc. However shipping doc/PLANNING and doc/README in both the main package and the -devel sub-package is redundant. OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible ?? - sources might not match upstream sources + As noted earlier, please document how the sources were obtained. Place a comment above the Source0 tag for this. xx - package does not build successfully + sat-solver-no-bindings.patch does not apply cleanly and causes a build failure in Rawhide, which uses '/usr/bin/patch -s -p0 --fuzz=0'. See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=882707&name=build.log ?? - ExcludeArch not needed ?? - missing build dependencies + Can not verify because package fails to build. OK - no locales xx - %post and %postun should not invoke ldconfig + Since shared libraries are not being shipped, invocation of /sbin/ldconfig is not needed and should be removed. OK - package is not relocatable OK - missing dependency on package that creates directory OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - static libraries in -static package OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no shared library files OK - -devel does not require base package + Only static libraries are provided as part of the -devel or -static package. Base package consists of only executables. OK - no libtool archives OK - %{name}.desktop file not needed OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: OK - upstream provides license text xx - no translations for description and summary xx - package does not build in mock successfully + As noted above, package fails to build in Rawhide. ?? - package builds on all supported architectures ?? - package functions as expected + Other components of the Zypper stack are needed to verify functionality. xx - scriptlets are not sane + As noted above, scriptlets are not needed and should be removed. OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed + -devel provides a -static package. OK - no pkgconfig files OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:30:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152230.m9FMUQ2h006258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |randyn3lrx at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 22:27:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152227.m9FMRZtd005662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 --- Comment #5 from Randall Berry 2008-10-15 18:27:33 EDT --- [*] OK [x] Fail (see comment) [o] Not Applicable [?] Questions [*] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. Release: 0.2 should be Release: 2%{dist} to conform with package naming guidelines found here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines < [*] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines. [x] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. When errors are fixed it will meet guidelines. [*] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. [*] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [*] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [*] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [?] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Source0 still lacks a valid download URL "Source0: This must be working upstream source tarball download link." Exceptions to this rule can found here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL < Please comment here your valid exception for not providing a full link. [*] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Package successful mock build on F-9 and Rawhide (i386) and run on F-9 [o] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 [*] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [o] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig.An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig [*] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [*] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [*] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [*] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [*] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [*] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. Some inconsistencies in the use of the %{name} macro. But in this case some may consider using macros in all instances overkill. [*] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity.) [*] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [o] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [o] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [o] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [o] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [o] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [*] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [*] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [*] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 23:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152304.m9FN4UYZ011221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #27 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-15 19:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev > > 3468) > > > > be OK for this package? > > Actually, shouldn't it be pymol-1.1-5.3419svn ? I updated my SVN checkout to correspond to 1.1r2 (3468) > Or, if this is more a prerelease of 1.2 than a release of the 1.1 series, then > pymol-1.2-0.1.3419svn . SVN trunk represents 1.2, the b11 branch should be 1.1: http://pymol.org/news.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 23:21:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464441] Review Request: HamFax - An application for sending and receiving facsimiles in amateur radio. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152321.m9FNLhIo013764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464441 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 23:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466660] Review Request: sympy - A Python library for symbolic mathematics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152328.m9FNSWmI014711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466660 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-15 19:28:31 EDT --- Built in rawhide. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 23:40:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:40:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810152340.m9FNe5bq016609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-15 19:40:04 EDT --- A couple of remarks, before the full review - the correct license is GPLv2+. All files that include a license in the header specify, and I quote: This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. - the compilation flags which are mandatory for Fedora are ignored. Please make sure that the make process uses %{optflags} - I did not examine carefully the program, but I think that you can eliminate the need of suid group for the checkdns folder if - in %post - you create a checkdns user and use chown checkdns.apache /var/www/html/checkdns chmod 755 /var/www/html/checkdns make sure that the checkdns program is run as the checkdns user (which is extremely easy to do in cron) The only drawback is that if the program is run by another user (in a console), the HTML files will not be created with the correct ownership. But as the output is sent to the console, it can be redirected anywhere. - in addition to the above, I urge you to install an example cron file, either in /var/spool/cron/checkdns (make sure you match the user created above) or in /etc/cron.d (in which case make sure you specify the user that the script runs as, for instance: # Runs the chkdns periodic check 17 01 * * * checkdns /bin/checkdns 1> /dev/null 2> /dev/null once again, the user after the time fields must match the one created in %post - feel free to drop the TODO file, it's useless in the current form. However, leave it in if you think that it might contain something useful in the foreseeable future -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 00:16:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160016.m9G0GVuf022063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #31 from rob 2008-10-15 20:16:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > I need to update the packaging guidelines for Eclipse plugins to say put things > in either %{_libdir}/eclipse/dropins//{plugins,features} > or %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins//{plugins,features}. That would be good. I was confused when I came across the dropins dir, so I just ignored it. :) Another question I had was, should I be able to use pdebuild for a plugin? It seemed to work great for features, but choked hard for me on plugins. > I'll take this review. Rob, care to review Eclemma when I update it to reflect > the new guidelines? Absolutely. Just update #444512 when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 00:49:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160049.m9G0nWtP026298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-15 20:49:30 EDT --- How about rawhide's ghc? Did the extra macro bits make it in yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 01:02:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160102.m9G12NNO028488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #32 from rob 2008-10-15 21:02:22 EDT --- Is this closer to what the guidelines will require? http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-3.fc10/eclipse-anyedit.spec http://rmyers.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-anyedit/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 01:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160116.m9G1GAhR030368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |464117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 01:16:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160116.m9G1G9Xi030318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464141 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-15 21:16:08 EDT --- This failed to build for me; all of the tests failed due to a lack of Test::More. It is quite important that you test your builds in mock or do a koji scratch build before submitting them. To do that, install fedora-packager and then either run mock -r fedora-rawhide-i386 --rebuild perl-SVN-Notify-2.78-1.fc9.src.rpm (which may take quite some time to download packages if you don't have a fast connection) or run fedora-packager-setup to get your keys set up and then run koji build --scratch dist-f10 perl-SVN-Notify-2.78-1.fc9.src.rpm to build the package in our buildsystem on what will soon become F10. After adding BuildRequires: perl(Test::More), things build OK. However, I guess this requires Text::Trac in order to install, even though nothing in this ticket indicates that. I'll set up the proper dependencies, although I wish that had been done ahead of time so that I wouldn't have wasted the time reviewing this. A couple of other comments: It looks a little odd to not enclose "_bindir" (after %files -n svnnotify) in brackets, but I don't think it makes any difference. Otherwise there are minor deviations from our usual Perl packages (which are mostly autogenerated) but nothing material. The descriptions are a bit sparse. I guess the one for the Perl module comes from upstream, but the one for the svnnotify package doesn't seem to actually indicate with the package does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 01:53:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160153.m9G1r64L003253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Colin Walters 2008-10-15 21:53:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clojure Short Description: A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine Owners: walters Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:00:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461909] Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160200.m9G20jYL005358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461909 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:00:44 EDT --- sms_ntsc-0.2.3-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461909] Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160200.m9G20m0X005393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461909 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461910] Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G259te006622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461910 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:05:09 EDT --- snes_ntsc-0.2.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:03:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461909] Review Request: sms_ntsc - SMS NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160203.m9G23HZR005978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461909 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:03:16 EDT --- sms_ntsc-0.2.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461910] Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G25IoO006771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461910 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:05:17 EDT --- snes_ntsc-0.2.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:03:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160203.m9G230FU005931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:02:59 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160202.m9G22MWn005710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:02:21 EDT --- ctemplate-0.91-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160202.m9G22rR4005864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:02:51 EDT --- lxde-common-0.3.2.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:02:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160202.m9G22WnF005742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:02:31 EDT --- pymssql-0.8.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G25aYF006879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:05:35 EDT --- python-cssutils-0.9.5.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:02:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160202.m9G22uei005904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461910] Review Request: snes_ntsc - SNES NTSC video filtering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G25CLU006654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461910 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457207] Review Request: python-cssutils - CSS Cascading Style Sheets library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G25dHo006912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457207 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459983] Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160204.m9G24RwN005821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459983 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:04:26 EDT --- moe-1.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:05:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:05:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459983] Review Request: moe - A powerful clean text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160205.m9G251Kq006138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459983 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:05:00 EDT --- moe-1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:01:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160201.m9G21heJ005089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:01:40 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160206.m9G26ILx006748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:06:17 EDT --- sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:04:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160204.m9G24ZaB005857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:04:33 EDT --- tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:02:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454564] Review Request: pymssql - A simple database interface to MS-SQL for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160202.m9G22ZsR005429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463996] Review Request: tuxguitar - A multitrack tablature editor and player written in Java-SWT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160210.m9G2ASNb008806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463996 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:10:27 EDT --- tuxguitar-1.0-7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:07:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464190] Review Request: expendable - Home finances modeling program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160207.m9G27QQi007553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464190 --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-15 22:07:25 EDT --- Tim, the package seems to have been built (several times..). Any reason to not close the bug ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:07:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461428] Review Request: orsa - Orbit Reconstruction, Simulation and Analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160207.m9G27PCl007535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461428 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:07:24 EDT --- orsa-0.7.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:11:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160211.m9G2BPL8008755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:11:24 EDT --- lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:06:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160206.m9G26icR006939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:06:43 EDT --- lxsession-lite-0.3.6-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:06:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160206.m9G26lrk007078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160219.m9G2J9TB010915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |rakarrack Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-15 22:19:08 EDT --- Well done. Now it's time to play some guitar :) --------------------------------------------- This package (rakarrack) is APPROVED by oget. --------------------------------------------- I recommend you to do some package reviews. I learned a lot about packaging while doing reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:11:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459138] Review Request: ctemplate - A simple but powerful template language for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160211.m9G2BwUj009498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459138 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 22:11:58 EDT --- ctemplate-0.91-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 02:33:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: imain at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ovirt.org/libvirt-qpid.spec SRPM URL: http://ovirt.org/libvirt-qpid-0.2.0-1.src.rpm Description: I've packaged up libvirt-qpid and would like to have it reviewed for inclusion into fedora. libvirt-qpid provides an interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the AMQP protocol. The Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) is an open standard application layer protocol providing reliable transport of messages. QMF provides a modeling framework layer on top of qpid (which implements AMQP). This interface allows you to manage hosts, domains, pools etc. as a set of objects with properties and methods. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151704.m9FH43CQ005764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:04:02 EDT --- un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-core-fonts-1.0.2-0.6.080608.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151742.m9FHg2EF014557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-15 13:42:01 EDT --- un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/un-extra-fonts-1.0.2-0.7.080608.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:30:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151930.m9FJUF4C004943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lutter at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 19:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151901.m9FJ1x1B031977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:50:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151650.m9FGovvS002931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 12:50:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:04:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151704.m9FH4ROK005830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 13:04:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:00:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:00:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151700.m9FH0KUY005123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 13:00:19 EDT --- Note: As a RH employee, I think you can talk to spot about getting sponsored into packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 17:22:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151722.m9FHMu1Q006473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthew Truch 2008-10-15 13:22:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: getdata Short Description: Library for reading and writing dirfile data Owners: mtruch Branches: devel, F-9, F-8 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 15 16:58:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:58:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810151658.m9FGwKBI004511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2008-10-15 12:58:18 EDT --- cvs done. Note: tsagadai was added to the CC list only. tsagadai must be in the packager group before he can be a comaintainer on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 03:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160316.m9G3GaFr020585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 03:16:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 23:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465690] Review Request: perl-DBD-Multi - DB Proxy with failover and load balancing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160316.m9G3GBtQ020854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465690 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-15 23:16:10 EDT --- The DBI dependency is sorta roundabout -- DBD::Multi uses DBD::File, which in turn uses DBI (and is actually included in the DBI distribution). You're right that it would be nice to have an explicit dep, however :) Imported and building in devel. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 04:01:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160401.m9G41d8W027343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-16 00:01:38 EDT --- A few comments: Why would you need to define _default_patch_fuzz for a new package? It seems that at least the initial package should have patches which apply cleanly. matio-1.3.3-fortanpath.patch seems to lack an 'r'. There are a few commented-out bits I don't quite understand: #sed -i.fortranpath2 -e 's|src/fortran/matio_t.inc|src/matio_t.inc|' configure.ac configure Is this made unnecessary by the .fortranpath2 patch? #To disable rpath #./bootstrap Not sure why this is in there. What's the doxygen bit for? Did you just not want to ship the pdf file? (Nothing would require doing that, and if you're not going to ship it then it makes sense not to generate it, but a comment about why might help.) The need to move the source files (and the patches you have to carry to support that) just because rpm doesn't generate debuginfo properly is troubling. It's certainly OK if you want to do that, but I wonder if the problem is fully understood. Is there a bug open against rpm for this issue? I'll finish this review up tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 04:24:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160424.m9G4O6Si030994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 04:24:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160424.m9G4OJCa030621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |arping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 04:23:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] New: Review Request: arping - ping by ARP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arping - ping by ARP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Summary: Review Request: arping - ping by ARP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arping/arping.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/arping/arping-2.08-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Arping is a util to find out it a specific IP address on the LAN is 'taken' and what MAC address owns it. Sure, you *could* just use 'ping' to find out if it's taken and even if the computer blocks ping (and everything else) you still get an entry in your ARP cache. But what if you aren't on a routable net? Or the host blocks ping (all ICMP even)? Then you're screwed. Or you use arping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:18:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:18:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160518.m9G5ISQa006006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atorkhov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160549.m9G5nTJD010317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160546.m9G5k7v8010166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 01:46:06 EDT --- marking as DEADREVIEW as no updates from submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431154] Review Request: IMDbPY - Retrieve and manage the data of the IMDb movie database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160537.m9G5bsQv008938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431154 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(allisson at gmail.co |fedora-review- |m) | --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 01:37:52 EDT --- OK marking this as a DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:49:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458698] Review Request: libgdbus - D-Bus helper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160549.m9G5ntsZ010384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458698 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(marcel at holtmann.o | |rg) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160539.m9G5dYOd008911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #15 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 01:39:33 EDT --- I am not sure how to triage this package which have fedora-review+ and fedora-cvs+ where submitter don't want to add this to Fedora CVS. But I guess I can mark this review as FE-DEADREVIEW. If thats wrong correct me here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 05:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 01:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160537.m9G5bTmp008793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160615.m9G6F5b5014003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #16 from Marek Mahut 2008-10-16 02:15:04 EDT --- I think we have also to kill the CVS branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160614.m9G6EX15013670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:14:32 EDT --- > The correct upstream name is Old Standard That is not a valid package name. :) > However upstream has asked us to rename if we rebuilt from sfds > I guess 69oldstandard is as good as any renaming (though I'd have used > 69-old-standard-fonts) I assumed that meant the name of the Fonts not the package itself? The 69 is meaningless to me: as far as I can tell it is just an erroneous prefix coming from the fontconfig conf file priortity?? (I might be almost tempted to suggest then let's not bother to rebuild, but anyway.) old-standard-sfd-fonts, anyone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:19:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160619.m9G6J7WR014738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-10-16 02:19:06 EDT --- Hi, Still not buildable with F-10, other issues are fixed. SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm.spec SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:19:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160619.m9G6J5V2014312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #6 from Timon 2008-10-16 02:19:04 EDT --- >It looks a little odd to not enclose "_bindir" (after %files -n svnnotify) in brackets, but I don't think it makes any difference. fixed >The descriptions are a bit sparse. fixed >However, I guess this requires Text::Trac in order to install fixed in dep list >This failed to build for me fixed. tested with mock Spec URL: http://timon.perm.ru/download/perl-SVN-Notify.spec SRPM URL: http://timon.perm.ru/download/perl-SVN-Notify-2.78-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:29:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:29:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459579] Review Request: pike - Interpreted, high-level, object oriented language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160629.m9G6TTjY016180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459579 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-16 02:29:28 EDT --- Hi, any news on the perl? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160628.m9G6SPmk015656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:28:24 EDT --- Well there is VLGothic-fonts (and plenty of other mixed case packages in the distro), but I won't fight too much. Though IMHO case in tarball names is generally worth respecting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 06:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160643.m9G6hnJK017780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-16 02:43:48 EDT --- I added it to comps-f10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 07:18:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160718.m9G7Il8P023447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 03:18:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320522) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320522) Patch to fix headers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 07:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160716.m9G7G5da023315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 03:16:04 EDT --- Thanks to David Woodhouse for his help on IRC to fix F10 build issue. Actually problem is fbterm.cpp is using kernel header file #include which should be #include -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 07:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160728.m9G7SPgH024078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-16 03:28:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Blocking FE-Legal until I have time to look into this properly. Shit. Couldn't you do it early, on start of review to do not make work, which may become useless?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 07:47:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160747.m9G7l7Ne028237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #12 from Alan Pevec 2008-10-16 03:46:58 EDT --- Thanks Toshio, just one thing, in pkgdb, summary and descriptions are empty: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/publican-ovirt It should be: Summary: Common documentation files for oVirt Description: This package provides common files and templates needed to build documentation for oVirt with publican. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 07:58:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160758.m9G7wHPA030453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-10-16 03:58:03 EDT --- Thanks for the patch, it works. The revised SPEC and SRPM: SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm.spec SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm-1.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:10:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428798] Review Request: OmegaT - Computer Aid Translation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160810.m9G8Agqu031753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428798 --- Comment #37 from Ismael Olea 2008-10-16 04:10:39 EDT --- Perfect! Thanks :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:14:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160814.m9G8EEFr001188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 04:14:13 EDT --- publican-ovirt-0.4-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/publican-ovirt-0.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:14:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160814.m9G8ETMQ032159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2008-10-16 04:14:28 EDT --- New version, changelog : - Modify Summary: tag. - Add graphics license to License: tag. - Add Requires: pygtk2. - Update desktop file. - Remove duplicate license files. Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/openalchemist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/openalchemist-0.3-3.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] New: Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Summary: Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kraxel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object.spec SRPM URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/perl-Set-Object/perl-Set-Object-1.25-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This modules implements a set of objects, that is, an unordered collection of objects without duplication. The term *objects* is applied loosely - for the sake of Set::Object, anything that is a reference is considered an object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:39:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160839.m9G8dhbc005530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160838.m9G8crfT005470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #1 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-16 04:38:52 EDT --- Note 1: This is used by the openstreetmap.org map rendering software. Note 2: License isn't clear to me. http://search.cpan.org/dist/Set-Object/ just says "Artistic", without specifying which version of the license ... Note 3: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/fedora9/$basearch/ has repositories with binary packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160841.m9G8fgI8006165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 04:41:41 EDT --- Please understand that spot has a lot of work... Please be polite and don't use the words like "shit" or so carelessly, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:45:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160845.m9G8j2oh005180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:44:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] New: Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Summary: Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kraxel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngcrush/pngcrush.spec SRPM URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngcrush/pngcrush-1.6.10-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pngcrush is an optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files. It can be run from a commandline in an MSDOS window, or from a UNIX or LINUX commandline. Its main purpose is to reduce the size of the PNG IDAT datastream by trying various compression levels an PNG filter methods. It also can be used to remove unwanted ancillary chunks, or to add certain chunks including gAMA, tRNS, iCCP, and textual chunks. Note 1: used by openstreetmap.org map rendering software. Note 2: binary packages: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/fedora9/$basearch/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] New: Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Summary: Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kraxel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngnq/pngnq.spec SRPM URL: http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/osm/pngnq/pngnq-0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Pngnq is a tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format. The neuquant algorithm uses a neural network to optimise the color map selection. This is fast and quite accurate, giving good results on many types of images. Note: used by openstreetmap.org map rendering software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:51:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160851.m9G8pZJX006279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 08:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160851.m9G8pMuG006246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 --- Comment #1 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-16 04:51:21 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320530) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320530) License text Dunno how to categorize this license, to me it looks like based on zlib and mixed in something bsd-ish. Suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:05:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] New: Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sc-0.20040601-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sardinian hunspell dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467183] New: Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467183 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mt.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mt-0.20040325-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Maltese hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:13:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160913.m9G9DAxV010445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:12:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160912.m9G9Cex1010310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-16 05:12:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=883692 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and RPM. + source files match upstream. f97c7a403fa0895349809c8d18355cbc fbterm-1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI App. Suggestions:- 1) I see following in build.log configure: WARNING: gpm.h dosn't exist! gpm mouse support will be disabled! If you want you can add that support. ==> you can do that by adding BR:gpm-devel in SPEC 2) drop line in %build CFLAGS="-D__GNUC__" ; export CFLAGS 3) defattr usage should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) 4) Drop unnecessary file INSTALL from %docs Make sure to fix above issues before committing to CVS. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464190] Review Request: expendable - Home finances modeling program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160948.m9G9mPDa018416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464190 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Tim Waugh 2008-10-16 05:48:24 EDT --- Sorry, forgot. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 09:57:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 05:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810160957.m9G9v5Ru020320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #18 from David Timms 2008-10-16 05:57:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rakarrack Short Description: Audio effects processing rack for guitar Owners: dtimms Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: ps. oget: I think the review procedures requires you set the assigned to yourself as reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:01:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161001.m9GA1Cuc021374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |with libvirt using QMF | |(qpid modeling framework) | |which utilizes the Advanced | |Message Queuing protocol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:14:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:14:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161014.m9GAEU34022936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #19 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-16 06:14:30 EDT --- sorry, I missed that :) done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:23:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161023.m9GANQ1b025412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:23:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161023.m9GANlGj025468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-16 06:23:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Please understand that spot has a lot of work... I believe in that. I'm do not object to legal check at all. But it is a pity also, if it will be blocked on end of process... > Please be polite > and don't use the words like "shit" or so carelessly, please. Sorry if it is offend you. It wasn't addressed to you. It wasn't addressed anybody concrete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:25:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161025.m9GAPnam025655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Jan Safranek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-16 06:25:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ipmitool Short Description: Utility for IPMI control Owners: jsafrane Branches: F-10 InitialCC: I hope I can still catch F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161032.m9GAWINY027185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #2 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-16 06:32:17 EDT --- Quote from http://search.cpan.org/src/SAMV/Set-Object-1.26/lib/Set/Object.pm =head1 LICENCE Copyright (c) 1998-1999, Jean-Louis Leroy. All Rights Reserved. This module is free software. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the terms of the Perl Artistic License Portions Copyright (c) 2003 - 2005, Sam Vilain. Same license. Portions Copyright (c) 2006, 2007, Catalyst IT (NZ) Limited. Same license. So the license is the same Artistic as perl is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:40:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161040.m9GAeVhe028767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-16 06:40:29 EDT --- CVS request is written below, please create early F10 branch and devel: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tightvnc Short Description: A TightVNC remote display system Owners: atkac Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 10:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161050.m9GAoWOO029767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 11:17:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161117.m9GBHfcE002663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 07:17:41 EDT --- printoxx-1.6-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/printoxx-1.6-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 11:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161116.m9GBGq4A002534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 07:16:51 EDT --- printoxx-1.6-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/printoxx-1.6-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 11:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161129.m9GBTRbg004205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 07:29:26 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 11:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161150.m9GBoXce008505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #3 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-16 07:50:32 EDT --- See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing There is Artistic 1.0 (*not* FSF free, http://www.perl.com/pub/a/language/misc/Artistic.html). There is Artistic 2.0 (FSF free, http://www.perlfoundation.org/artistic_license_2_0). Perl itself is (as I read it) Artistic 1.0 or GPLv1+ (http://dev.perl.org/licenses/), which is FSF free too. So the question is: what does the term "the Perl Artistic License" refer to? Same license as perl (both GPL and Artistic)? Artistic only? If the later, which of the two version? Given that the creation of the package predates the Artistic License 2.0 it probably isn't that one ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 12:02:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161202.m9GC2dxN010963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 12:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453026] Review Request: xmp - A multi-format module player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161206.m9GC6YK7011797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453026 Bug 453026 depends on bug 454364, which changed state. Bug 454364 Summary: libSAD API headers are broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454364 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 12:16:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161216.m9GCG4UZ013927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #35 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-10-16 08:16:01 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=arbiter/public_git/rpm.git;a=blob_plain;f=libs/sat-solver/sat-solver.spec;hb=master SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/srpm/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884098 * Thu Oct 16 2008 Lorenzo Villani - 0.9.5-1 - Comments on source0 origin - Removed no-bindings patch - Added perl and python bindings - rpm 4.5.90 patch - Test suite not stripped and enabled (recompressed tarball using bzip2 to save space and bandwidth) - Preserve timestamp when installing - Rationale about static libs - Removed unneeded scriptlets - Add other documentation to the main package - Remove redundant documentation files from other packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 12:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161238.m9GCcVCK018670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #33 from Andrew Overholt 2008-10-16 08:38:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Is this closer to what the guidelines will require? Yes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 13:43:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161343.m9GDhVe6000585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us --- Comment #11 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-16 09:43:28 EDT --- have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Running_scriptlets_only_in_certain_situations i think you should only run the %pre and %post scriptlets on install rather than checking each time if things are there or not. you should also remove %define doc_dir %{_docdir}/%{name} and mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{doc_dir} from the spec file. its not needed. you can and should post a tarball on fedorahosted. please do so and use the full url to the upstream source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 13:56:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465694] Review Request: drascula - Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161356.m9GDuJa5002658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465694 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:15:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161415.m9GEFwRf006748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jskala at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2008-10-16 10:15:57 EDT --- We already ship this as part of iputils. What is the difference in this version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:30:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161430.m9GEUS5D012495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-16 10:30:26 EDT --- Looking at the previous submission, it seems that this arping has advantages over th eone in iputils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:27:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161427.m9GER4xK012588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-16 10:27:03 EDT --- I know how to fix this, but when I did, it exposed a bug in the coccinella stack, so I want to make sure I have that fixed before I go forward here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161429.m9GETk5w013333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:29:45 EDT --- All applied patches submitted upstream: Fix some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6478 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:30:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161430.m9GEU8Ec013706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:30:07 EDT --- Typo patch has been accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/openssl_module/source/pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in?r1=1.15&r2=1.16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161431.m9GEVDgE013963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:31:12 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-credential.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161429.m9GETAfd013263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sindrepb at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-16 10:29:08 EDT --- *** Bug 239470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239470] Review Request: arping-ng - Sends IP and/or ARP pings (to the MAC address) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161429.m9GET9Vj013230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239470 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA |DUPLICATE --- Comment #23 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-16 10:29:08 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467157 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:31:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161431.m9GEVMlh013998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:31:21 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-proxy-core.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161430.m9GEUu8D013819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:30:55 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-callback.spec All applied patches submitted upstream: Use .la files when linking within a package: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6476 Patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/callback/source/library/Makefile.am?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161430.m9GEUPKl013745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:30:24 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.0-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-cert-utils.spec All applied patches submitted upstream: Environment variable elimination patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6471 Patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/cert_utils/source/programs/grid-cert-info.in?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/cert_utils/source/programs/grid-cert-request.in?r1=1.22&r2=1.23 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/cert_utils/source/programs/grid-change-pass-phrase.in?r1=1.7&r2=1.8 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/cert_utils/source/programs/grid-default-ca.in?r1=1.15&r2=1.16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463233] Review Request: Web App for Appliance Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161431.m9GEVN40014019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463233 --- Comment #3 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-16 10:31:22 EDT --- I have uploaded a new srpm. Information is below. Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace-console-wui.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/ace-console-wui-0.0.3-4.fc9.src.rpm Clean Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884303 Explanations on the rpmlint errors: ace-console-wui.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/ace/ace-console-wui/db/development.sqlite3 ----------------------------------------------------- Currently rails requires a database. This is the empty sqlite backed file for this. ace-console-wui.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative (several of these) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The symlinks are to macro driven locations (e.g. linking to %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/test.rb). This seems a less fragile approach then using lots of nested ../ ace-console-wui.noarch: E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ace-console-wui ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This service is using mongrel-rails under the cover. The lockfile is parameter driven (stole this from ovirt) and that trigger this error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:31:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161431.m9GEV72I013141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-16 10:31:06 EDT --- Patch_fuzz: I'm on Fedora-8. So, patches are generated that way with gendiff. Also, I Plan to have matio in F-9 (maybe F-8). The patches have been sent upstream anyway. (still not sure they have been received). Missing r: True, typo. #sed -i.fortranpath2 ... : yes, matio-1.3.3-fortranpath2.patch prevent to dynamic patch configure and configure.ac. rpath: there is differents ways to disable rpath related to the reason why they are there. Here is is because of patched autotools. our autotools doesn't create rpathes, so it is easier to avoid with patching libtool. docs and the pdf: The comment leave in the %install section. pdf is disabled because it duplicates with doxygen. it doesn't seems interesting to have docs twices. The problem with the path for the fortran files is that they are listed in the src/Makefile.am whereas present in the src/fortran/ directory. There is two way to fix this either move back the src/fortran/* to src/* or to list the fortran files in their own directory (src/fortran/Makefile.am using subdir += fortran in src/Makefile.am) This problem has nothing to do with rpm but with "autotools preference" At least, that's what I expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] New: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gss-assist.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gss-assist-4.0-0.2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gss-assist package contains: GSSAPI Assist library BuildRequires: gpt BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 2 BuildRequires: globus-gsi-sysconfig-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-callout-devel BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. Applied patches submitted upstream: Environment variable elimination patch: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6480 globus_i_gss_assist_gridmap_parse_globusid and X509_NAME_oneline don't normalize DNs the same way: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1417 Fix some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6482 The package also incorporates the GRIDMAPDIR patch from VDT: http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/patches/1.10.1/011__gss_assist_gridmap.diff -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:35:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161435.m9GEZCSr015299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |453865 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:31:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] New: Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Summary: Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-callout.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-callout-0.7-0.2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-callout package contains: Globus Callout Library BuildRequires: gpt BuildRequires: globus-libtool-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] New: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-0.2.fc9.src.rpm Description: The Globus Toolkit is an open source software toolkit used for building Grid systems and applications. It is being developed by the Globus Alliance and many others all over the world. A growing number of projects and companies are using the Globus Toolkit to unlock the potential of grids for their cause. The globus-gssapi-gsi package contains: GSSAPI library BuildRequires: gpt BuildRequires: globus-gsi-credential-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-gsi-callback-devel BuildRequires: globus-openssl-module-devel BuildRequires: globus-gsi-openssl-error-devel BuildRequires: globus-openssl-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-gsi-proxy-core-devel >= 1 BuildRequires: globus-core-devel >= 4 BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 5 BuildRequires: globus-common-devel >= 3 Based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release. All applied patches submitted upstream: Use versioned symbols for GSSAPI functions (like kerberos): http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6415 http://bugzilla.nordugrid.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 Fix some doxygen warnings: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:35:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161435.m9GEZBii015273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467239 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:35:09 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-proxy-utils.spec The new version has one additional build requirement: BuildRequires: globus-gss-assist-devel >= 3 So I needed to add a request for this package (#467239) in order to update this request to the latest version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161442.m9GEgwnH017016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:42:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:42:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161442.m9GEgv8V016983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161442.m9GEgxNO017060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:42:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161442.m9GEgxrR017040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh3em017143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh4Pg017183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh1W9017101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh3oB017163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh0cW017080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161443.m9GEh2kJ017122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161442.m9GEguJk016947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453850, | |453851, 453853, 453855, | |453856, 453858, 453861, | |453862 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:45:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161445.m9GEjUsc016491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 10:45:28 EDT --- apt-mirror-0.4.5-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apt-mirror-0.4.5-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnQIX018711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnRX9018731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnNrT018599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |453847, 453848, 453851, | |453856, 453857, 467235, | |467237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:12:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161512.m9GFCJNg023193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 11:12:16 EDT --- If you heard any news from upstream, please let me know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161520.m9GFKlGa025106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 11:20:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161516.m9GFGTo8025802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fenn at stanford.edu | |) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 11:16:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161515.m9GFFcWn025564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o | |rg) --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 11:15:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161523.m9GFNfUx025528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 11:23:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev > 3468) Main version, date when checked out and svn revision number information is enough for tarball naming and rpm versioning in this case (RC2 information is not so useful for this case). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:28:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161528.m9GFSsCE026430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2008-10-16 11:28:53 EDT --- What features, and why aren't they in upstream arping? (For something this simple, excessive redundancy seems bad.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:30:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161530.m9GFUU8P026957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-16 11:30:29 EDT --- The upstream page is: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.3/bioc/html/GeneR.html The sources are: http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.3/bioc/src/contrib/GeneR_2.11.1.tar.gz I will change the spec and update a new one, and correct R2spec for that bug :-D hm I am not sure to understand correctly your : > Other than not being able to download it, I see no problems with shipping the > development bits if that's what you're willing to support. Could you elaborate a bit more ? Thanks for your review, let's wait for legal to see how it ends. About the review I have made one for Alex (lancaster) not long ago (a R library), but when you see a review request for R libraries do not hesitate to ping me on irc or to put me as cc on the bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:43:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161543.m9GFhgKq030849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:42:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] New: Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=918e9f907e958fdbc2016dcc5e36bf4099800bd7;path=/filesystem/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-filesystem-30-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW base filesystem and environment This is the base component which sets up the filesystem and environment used by all Fedora MinGW packages. The filesystem layout is explained in the packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Filesystem_layout Note that there is no upstream for this package, since it's something which is maintained and evolved by the Fedora MinGW SIG ourselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:47:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161547.m9GFlCxu031668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #5 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-16 11:47:11 EDT --- pong was on vacation. now i'm back and fighting with bam :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:48:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161548.m9GFmqRj030188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 --- Comment #5 from Matthew Truch 2008-10-16 11:48:51 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Michael! As for the Fortran flags, I am pretty oblivious to all things fortran. Is there an rpm macro which has the global Fedora $FFLAGS that I don't know about? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161548.m9GFmF24030102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 11:48:14 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884352 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:49:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161549.m9GFnwAE030270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 11:49:57 EDT --- List of files contained in the package for easy reference: /etc/profile.d/mingw32.csh /etc/profile.d/mingw32.sh /etc/rpm/macros.mingw32 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sys /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/pkgconfig /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/aclocal /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/doc /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/info /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man1 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man2 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man3 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man4 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man5 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man6 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man7 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/man8 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/manl /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/man/mann /usr/lib/rpm/mingw32-find-provides.sh /usr/lib/rpm/mingw32-find-requires.sh /usr/share/doc/mingw32-filesystem-30 /usr/share/doc/mingw32-filesystem-30/COPYING And the requires/provides: $ rpm -q --requires -p mingw32-filesystem-30-1.fc9.noarch.rpm /bin/bash config(mingw32-filesystem) = 30-1.fc9 rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 setup $ rpm -q --provides -p mingw32-filesystem-30-1.fc9.noarch.rpm config(mingw32-filesystem) = 30-1.fc9 mingw-filesystem < 26 mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(mscoree.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(ole32.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) mingw32-filesystem = 30-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:37:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161537.m9GFbdNw028036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-16 11:37:38 EDT --- New version: Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-GeneR.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-GeneR-2.11.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:40:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161440.m9GEeUr7016507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-16 10:40:29 EDT --- Hello, and sorry for the late answear I think the whole framework could have a issue. Specially on lib64 system (mutlilibs systems using /usr/lib64 as a standard path for libs). And maybe we have a problem with -FPIC not been used on x86 system. (light library can avoid using Position independant Code for shared libs, but it cannot be prelinked and can gives selinux denials) I'm still searching for package to test frei0r-plugins usability (for now i'm using my own package of LiVES but mlt could be a good candidate) I will use my public/experimental repository for testing the whole framework against rawhide x86 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161620.m9GGK1B8003633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-binutils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161618.m9GGIKrM003425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |454408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:18:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161618.m9GGIJ3P003397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467260 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 12:18:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=918e9f907e958fdbc2016dcc5e36bf4099800bd7;path=/binutils/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-binutils-2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc9.src.rpm This is the latest version, updated to conform with the approved packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161623.m9GGNAuT004343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mingw-zlib |Review Request: |- MinGW Windows zlib |mingw32-zlib - MinGW |compression library |Windows zlib compression | |library Alias| |mingw32-zlib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:21:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161621.m9GGLtMf004207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: mingw-gcc - |Review Request: mingw32-gcc |MinGW Windows |- MinGW Windows |cross-compiler (GCC) for C |cross-compiler (GCC) for C |and C++ |and C++ Alias| |mingw32-gcc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161622.m9GGMh8k005982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw-w32api - MinGW |mingw32-w32api - MinGW |Windows cross-compiler |Windows cross-compiler |Win32 header files |Win32 header files Alias| |mingw32-w32api -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:22:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161622.m9GGMJJB005949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw-runtime - MinGW |mingw32-runtime - MinGW |Windows cross-compiler |Windows cross-compiler |runtime and root filesystem |runtime and root filesystem Alias| |mingw32-runtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161634.m9GGYmXR007648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 12:34:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=918e9f907e958fdbc2016dcc5e36bf4099800bd7;path=/gcc/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gcc-4.3.2-7.fc9.src.rpm Note that this package has a circular dependency. It needs mingw32-runtime and mingw32-w32api, and those can't be built without gcc. This is explained here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Bootstrapping There are a couple of extra things we ought to do with this package. Firstly the build patch needs to go upstream. Secondly we need to look at the Fedora gcc + patches and decide what if anything from that needs to go into this package. Note that Fedora native gcc is not based on released gcc versions, but on some sort of RH-specific branch maintained by jakub in the gcc SVN. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: gpt - The Grid Packaging Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnOHh018635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453848] Review Request: globus-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus Core In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnPbV018667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453848 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnQrr018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnTJh018772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:21:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161621.m9GGLNAh005763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |mingw32-filesystem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161449.m9GEnS4G018752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:30:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161430.m9GEUg8w012535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-16 10:30:42 EDT --- New version based on the globus toolkit 4.2.1 release: SRPM: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/src/SRPMS/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-0.2.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/fedora/9/info/globus-gsi-sysconfig.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 16:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 12:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161619.m9GGJVbh005197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw-binutils - MinGW |mingw32-binutils - MinGW |Windows binutils |Windows binutils -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:55:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467245] Review Request: libdmraid-events - dmraid event processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161455.m9GEtbRR020735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467245 Jiri Moskovcak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-10-16 10:55:36 EDT --- oops, should be rhel not fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 15:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161505.m9GF5E5O023217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-16 11:05:13 EDT --- Scriplets fixed in %pre, I left %post as is, becouse in previous version the indentiry file have been on other place, so we want to check it during upgrade. docdir removed I disagree about that tarball. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream We are upstream. And our upstream is src.rpm, not tar.gz Therefore I provide url to our project and in comment explained how to get this src.rpm Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common-2.0.6-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 14:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467245] New: Review Request: libdmraid-events - dmraid event processing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdmraid-events - dmraid event processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467245 Summary: Review Request: libdmraid-events - dmraid event processing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmoskovc at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libdmraid-events.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/libdmraid-events-1.0.0.rc4-1.el5.src.rpm Description: dmraid event processing library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161700.m9GH099A009976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-16 13:00:08 EDT --- There are no legal concerns with this code, it is not encoding or decoding, it is just shuffling around the bits in the AVI header and index. Pavel, thanks for your patience. :) Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:03:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161703.m9GH37bA012386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-16 13:03:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:05:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:05:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161705.m9GH5ata012900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-16 13:05:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161704.m9GH4JLa012466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-16 13:04:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175047] Review Request: NetworkManager-openvpn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161708.m9GH82eK013331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175047 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #54 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-16 13:08:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161706.m9GH6xtu013203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-16 13:06:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:10:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161710.m9GHAwRG012086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fenn at stanford.edu | |) | --- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-16 13:10:57 EDT --- package has been added to CVS (devel and F-10) according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner , imported and builds requested, all OK. What else needs to be done? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161717.m9GHHn89012981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 13:17:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=e5c56106cce1c650599ff184215ba200338f2b13;path=/runtime/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-runtime-3.15.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Note the approved packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:18:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161718.m9GHILpC013128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Bug 462251 depends on bug 462250, which changed state. Bug 462250 Summary: Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:18:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161718.m9GHIKYS013092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 13:18:19 EDT --- Then you can close this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454414] Review Request: mingw32-w32api - MinGW Windows cross-compiler Win32 header files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161718.m9GHIG04014897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454414 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 13:18:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=e5c56106cce1c650599ff184215ba200338f2b13;path=/w32api/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-w32api-3.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Note the approved packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:25:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161725.m9GHP1CT015737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #29 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-16 13:24:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #25) > > pymol-1.1-20081015svn3468.CR2.tar.gz (version 1.1 candidate release 2, svn rev > > 3468) > > Main version, date when checked out and svn revision number information > is enough for tarball naming and rpm versioning in this case (RC2 information > is not so useful for this case). OK, let me know if this one looks alright: spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-6.20081015svn3468.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:34:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:34:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161734.m9GHYObB017320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-16 13:34:23 EDT --- New SRPM: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tileqt.spec Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161746.m9GHkBb7018584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #4 from Harry Waye 2008-10-16 13:46:10 EDT --- Excellent, your a star. Thanks for the update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:45:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] New: Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Summary: Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparrish at shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/qpackagekit/ SRPM URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/qpackagekit/ Description: Qt bindings for kpackagekit. build logs here https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884422 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161748.m9GHmwMY020109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-16 13:48:57 EDT --- %optflags and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS $FFLAGS is exported by %configure, see: rpm --eval %configure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 17:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] New: Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Summary: Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools-0.12.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a collection of various tools that may be useful to use in conjunction with ScummVM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:07:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161807.m9GI7LlN022607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:15:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161815.m9GIFBXk025252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-16 14:15:10 EDT --- Well, I may have overlooked the following issue before, however: while I just glanced at the source codes quickly and I have not examined this package yet, now I have some concern about this package so I want to ask spot. @ spot: Would you check some codes I write below? A. packages/anasazi/epetra/util/ModeLaplace/BlockPCGSolver.cpp or so These files have the license terms like below: ------------------------------------------------------------ // The distribution of this software follows also the rules defined in Trilinos. // This notice shall be marked on any reproduction of this software, in whole or // in part. // // Under terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000, there is a non-exclusive // license for use of this work by or on behalf of the U.S. Government. // // This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but // WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of // MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ------------------------------------------------------------- I am not a lawyer and know almost nothing about US law. Then what does this "Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000" mean? B. Perhaps more issue: Trilinos_version.h packages/fei/base/FEI_Implementation.cpp and even more: These files have the license terms like below: /*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/ /* Copyright 2005 Sandia Corporation. */ /* Under the terms of Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000, there is a */ /* non-exclusive license for use of this work by or on behalf */ /* of the U.S. Government. Export of this program may require */ /* a license from the United States Government. */ /*--------------------------------------------------------------------*/ Especially I am concerned about the sentence "Export of this program may require a license from..". What does this mean? By the way the upstream is http://trilinos.sandia.gov/. @ deji: I found that some files like: packages/zoltan/src/postprocessing/ordering/order_eval.c (I could not find this file in 8.0.7 tarball) are licensed under CeCILL-C. While this license does not conflict with LGPL, this surely conflicts with GPL, so this may be against what you want. Would you check how these codes are used? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:27:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161827.m9GIRCZQ026140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-16 14:27:11 EDT --- for me there are no reason for duplicate, since the arping from iputils do the same thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:29:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161829.m9GITxHT027460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-16 14:29:58 EDT --- fyi, just a quick re-review, as this is just packagekit-qt renamed in a newer release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:35:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161835.m9GIZEL0028793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-16 14:35:13 EDT --- Just a few items: 1. The Obsoletes: libpackagekit-qt ... should be Obsoletes: packagekit-qt ... 2. drop extraneous Provides: qpackagekit = %{version}-%{release} Provides: qpackagekit-devel = %{version}-%{release} that's the implicit name of the (sub)package already. Or did you mean to say: packagekit-qt here (for backward compatibility)? 3. -devel summary should be changed to: Summary: Development files for %{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:44:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161844.m9GIiAcu029260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-16 14:44:08 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: insight New Branches: EL-5 New branch owner: lkundrak Patrick Monnerat agreed to branching for EPEL by mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:45:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161845.m9GIjELj031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 --- Comment #3 from Steven M. Parrish 2008-10-16 14:45:13 EDT --- Fixed, fixed and fixed. Everything in the same place https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=884644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161850.m9GIo4o6030546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-16 14:50:03 EDT --- Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. I wonder why rpmlint is now complaining about the perl depencencies in the documentation files. Obviously these aren't problematic but I wonder why I didn't see them before. So that I mention it, they're pairs of the form: perl-Sysadm-Install.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27/eg/ask perl-Sysadm-Install.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27/eg/ask /usr/bin/perl one pair for each executable file in the eg directory. Anyway, everything looks fine to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:58:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226285] Merge Review: perl-XML-Grove In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161858.m9GIw7ut000364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 --- Comment #38 from Stepan Kasal 2008-10-16 14:58:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Everything is right now. APPROVED. THANKS > One minor thing, I think that > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/XML/DOM-ecmascript.pod > should be labelled as %doc, but also that it should be automatic. done in -36.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 18:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161857.m9GIv78j001789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-16 14:57:06 EDT --- Looks good. rpmlint relatively happy: $ rpmlint qpackagekit-*.rpm qpackagekit.x86_64: W: no-documentation qpackagekit.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided packagekit-qt qpackagekit-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation qpackagekit-devel.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided packagekit-qt-devel 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:05:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161905.m9GJ5TJK002023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-16 15:05:28 EDT --- Yes, rpmlint is silent now, the license is correct, license text is included as documentation, macro usage in the spec is consistent, and the current version is being packaged. The new tarball matches upstream: 62e83f90126c4085369bf388cb3d56524bac6181f0f9a2f28a65c673d1bfec3f sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4.tar.gz I agree about the tests; it would be nice to run them, but there's no point blocking this package until the requirements for the test suite are in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161906.m9GJ6UCU004091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-16 15:06:28 EDT --- I'm more concerned about B, since I also have no idea what Contract DE-AC04-94AL85000 means. We'd need upstream to clarify this for us. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:09:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:09:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161909.m9GJ9PTj002637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #6 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-16 15:09:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > for me there are no reason for duplicate, since the arping from iputils do the > same thing. No problem, just close the bug. Manuel in the other submission said that there were interesting features, but if he wants it he can submit it ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:13:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161913.m9GJDnZc003841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-16 15:13:48 EDT --- OK, I can now grab the upstream source, so that's fine. ed523485e92078f1a23cb59e739730cb161bff2cfe8e0b8b348019a7d43772e0 GeneR_2.11.1.tar.gz Now we just await review of the CeCILL v1 license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161913.m9GJDtDn005777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Steven M. Parrish 2008-10-16 15:13:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qpackagekit Short Description: Qt bindings for kpackagekit Owners: tuxbrewr Branches: F-9, devel InitialCC: rdieter, kkofler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161939.m9GJd4Va011336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-16 15:39:03 EDT --- I'm not sure I understand about the patch fuzz; are you saying that gendiff generates patches which need fuzz to apply or that the F8-generated patches simply need fuzz to apply on rawhide? Either of those cases seems somewhat bizarre to me. I understand that there are muliple ways to disable rpath; my concern is thatthe sed call shouldn't be there at all if it's commented out. At least not without some explanatory comment about it. I understand that it doesn't seem interesting include both PDF and HTML documentation; my point is that I can't tell from the comments in your spec that you have code to accomplish that. "#Fake the pdf creation" isn't sufficient elaboration. > The problem with the path for the fortran files is that they are listed in the > src/Makefile.am whereas present in the src/fortran/ directory. Well, your comments indicate that the problem with this is improper debuginfo generation. Is that the case? All I'm asking is that you comment your spec such that I can understand it. This spec has several different hacks in it, yet it doesn't describe why they're needed clearly enough that someone else can look at it and understand why the hacks are all there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161950.m9GJoJrs014156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 15:50:18 EDT --- primer3-1.1.4-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/primer3-1.1.4-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161950.m9GJoMru014187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 15:50:22 EDT --- primer3-1.1.4-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/primer3-1.1.4-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 19:49:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467290] Review Request: qpackagekit - renamed from libpackagekit-qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810161949.m9GJn5e7013736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467290 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-16 15:49:04 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:20:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162020.m9GKKdgf020813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 16:20:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > One further note, pthreads would be a welcome addition. I packaged up win32-pthreads separately: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162031.m9GKVGa4022579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 16:31:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/zlib/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-zlib-1.2.3-10.fc9.src.rpm Updated package to conform with the approved packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162037.m9GKbg4O020720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 --- Comment #7 from Matthew Truch 2008-10-16 16:37:41 EDT --- That's interesting, as I do use %configure. Perhaps I need to set FCFLAGS to be the same as FFLAGS? When I run getdata's ./configure --help, it suggests that FFLAGS are used for the F77 compilation and the FCFLAGS are used for F90. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:40:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162040.m9GKenKO024004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:40:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467322] Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162040.m9GKemvK023979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-bzip2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467322] New: Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467322 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-bzip2 - MinGW port of bzip2 file compression utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/bzip2/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-bzip2-1.0.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains development tools and libraries for use when cross-compiling Windows software in Fedora. The approved packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:43:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] New: Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/portablexdr/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-portablexdr-4.0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library. The approved packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:44:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162044.m9GKiYB1024438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467324 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:44:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162044.m9GKiXSI024413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-portablexdr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:48:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162048.m9GKmwjg025418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467325 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162048.m9GKmvcR025394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-iconv -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:48:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457561] Review Request: pthsem - The GNU Portable Threads library extended with semaphore support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162048.m9GKm5k5025288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457561 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(andreas at bawue.net | |) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:48:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] New: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/iconv/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-iconv-1.12-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Note there is no native equivalent of this package. Its functionality is supplied by glibc. The approved packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162054.m9GKsbSd023602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162054.m9GKsaw9023578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-termcap --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-16 16:54:35 EDT --- Note that there is no native version of this package (it was dropped in Fedora 9 era). However we need it because there is no termcap in the Win32 API. Also note the license really is GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:52:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467329] New: Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/termcap/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is the GNU termcap library -- a library of C functions that enable programs to send control strings to terminals in a way independent of the terminal type. The GNU termcap library does not place an arbitrary limit on the size of termcap entries, unlike most other termcap libraries. This package contains libraries and development tools for the MinGW cross-compiled version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 20:56:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231305] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162056.m9GKu59p024206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231305 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2008-10-16 16:56:03 EDT --- Does 1.4.2 fix the problems? If not, is there anything I can do to help resolve the remaining issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 21:15:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162115.m9GLFdkr029916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from David Timms 2008-10-16 17:15:37 EDT --- And for me to set the cvs flag... doh. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 21:51:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162151.m9GLpX3H003659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 17:51:32 EDT --- DivFix++-0.30-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/DivFix++-0.30-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 21:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162151.m9GLpbLP000964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-16 17:51:36 EDT --- DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 21:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162159.m9GLxbqi004700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-16 17:59:35 EDT --- * pkgconfig file contains hardcoded /lib in libdir. This will break on lib64 platforms. MUST be fixed. $ rpmlint libnxml-devel-0.18.3-1.fc9.i386.rpm libnxml-devel.i386: W: no-documentation * BR doxygen graphviz - then run "doxygen doxy.conf" in %build to generate API documentation in ./doc/html APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162226.m9GMQXkU006386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lfarkas at lfarkas.o | |rg) | --- Comment #16 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-16 18:26:32 EDT --- can't checkout the cvs it seems the directory still not exists.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:28:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162228.m9GMSRsc006475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-16 18:28:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: remoot Short Description: ReMoot is a remote control wrapper Owners: fab Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:28:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162228.m9GMSfdb008975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:28:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447365] Review Request: llgal-0.13.15 - llgal generates static web-pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162228.m9GMSotC009015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447365 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks| |177841 Depends on|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:48:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162248.m9GMm6na012181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #14 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-16 18:48:05 EDT --- for me the url is working. http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SPECS/gstreamer-java.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/SRPMS/gstreamer-java-1.0-0.3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162252.m9GMqc8Q010093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 --- Comment #4 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-16 18:52:37 EDT --- Thanks for that; I saw those rpmlint warnings when I prepared the package myself and was a bit surprised by the "rpmlint is silent" comment, and put it down to maybe you having a different version of rpmlint. Apparently not then... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162254.m9GMsCEX012883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-16 18:54:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sysadm-Install Short Description: Typical installation tasks for system administrators Owners: pghmcfc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 22:56:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162256.m9GMuNGC013406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 18:56:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby Short Description: Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:00:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162300.m9GN0xUO011407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 19:00:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-gem_plugin New Branches: EL-4 Owners: sseago, kanarip Approved by sseago in private email -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:01:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162301.m9GN1Wxk011474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 19:01:31 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-fastthread New Branches: EL-4 Owners: sseago, kanarip Approved by sseago in private email -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162302.m9GN26Ft014244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 19:02:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-daemons New Branches: EL-4 Owners: sseago, kanarip Approved by sseago in private email -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162304.m9GN48CP014365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-16 19:04:07 EDT --- * I don't see anything wrong with the suggested iconv line. Hint: Run iconv on all files that need to be converted, then create a diff to replace your patch. If you disagree with the reviewer, don't jump to another solution, but find out whether you really tried the same fix. * --enable-debug in general is the wrong thing to do, especially if it sets more than just compiler flags like -g. This program also sets -DDEBUG which bears the risk of enabling and compiling optional code that is not wanted. This particular program doesn't evaluate the DEBUG define yet in its own source files, but other programs use such flags to toggle assertions/debugging output and diagnostic code paths. What you want instead is to simply ensure that the Fedora CFLAGS are accepted by the Makefile and are not modified in unwanted ways. Read the build log. * Re: comment 4 > %{__make} install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > INSTALL="install -p" Correct except for the CFLAGS definition, which must NOT be present here. Nothing during "make install" is supposed to compile anything. Also note that the %makeinstall macro may be used where a patch like ifstat-destdir.patch were far bigger. That macro is a little bit dangerous in some cases, so prefer the recommended make install invocation. * Licence is "GPLv2+" not "GPLv2". See header of the .c/.h files. Note the "or [...] any later version". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462505] Review Request: python-argparse - An optparse-inspired command-line parsing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162319.m9GNJCig014124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462505 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 16 23:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810162345.m9GNj4f7020364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pavel.lisy at gmail. | |com) --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 19:45:03 EDT --- Pavel, anything happening here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 00:29:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170029.m9H0T0Au026236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 20:28:59 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/genome.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/genome-1.4.2-4.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint messages: [jmeeuwen at ghandalf tools]$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/genome-*1.4.2-4* ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/cloud*-1.4.2-4* genome-firstboot.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-firstboot genome-release.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-genome genome-repo.noarch: W: service-default-enabled /etc/init.d/genome-repo-bootstrap genome-repo.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name genome-repo-bootstrap cloudhost-httpd.noarch: W: no-documentation cloudhost-httpd-redirect.noarch: W: no-documentation cloudmaster-httpd.noarch: W: no-documentation cloudmaster-httpd-redirect.noarch: W: no-documentation 20 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 00:36:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170036.m9H0a3ZJ027348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #13 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-16 20:36:02 EDT --- Yes, they're in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 00:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] New: Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Camping for Sissies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Camping for Sissies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Camping for Sissies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-picnic.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Camping for Sissies rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - f8 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885583 - f9 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885585 - f10 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885587 - f11 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 00:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170052.m9H0qceU029685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #7 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-10-16 20:52:37 EDT --- Thanks so much for helping me to fix the issues. The revise spec and srpm which address your latest comments are at: SPEC: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm.spec SRPM: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/fbterm-1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm Regards, Ding-Yi Chen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 00:58:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] New: Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-reststop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs - rpmlint silent - files listed twice warning during build, but unknown cause - LGPLv3 from README.txt koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885591 - dist-f9-updates-candidate - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885593 - dist-f10 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885595 - dist-f11 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=885597 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 01:04:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170104.m9H14a7a031280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 --- Comment #44 from Matt Good 2008-10-16 21:04:35 EDT --- Well, I told Adam the changes that I think would need made for the format change (mostly just removing the current decryption), so I'm waiting on a patch. I'm not actively working on this anymore, but I'm glad to accept patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 01:06:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Picnic makes it easy(ier) to distribute and run Camping-based applications as well-behaved stand-alone Linux/Windows services. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170106.m9H16K0X031799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-picnic - Camping |rubygem-picnic - Picnic |for Sissies |makes it easy(ier) to | |distribute and run | |Camping-based applications | |as well-behaved stand-alone | |Linux/Windows services. --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-16 21:06:19 EDT --- Amended description of the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 01:09:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170109.m9H19g6a032128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-picnic - Picnic |rubygem-picnic - Easier |makes it easy(ier) to |distribution of Camping |distribute and run |based applications |Camping-based applications | |as well-behaved stand-alone | |Linux/Windows services. | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 01:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170125.m9H1PGZJ031789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 David Lutterkort changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lutter at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lutter at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 01:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170135.m9H1Z98q003388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #1 from David Lutterkort 2008-10-16 21:35:08 EDT --- Can you run rpmlint over it and fix the errors and warnings it produces ? Once that's done, I'll do a more thorough review. Here's a few more obvious nits: * change the make line in %build to make %{?_smp_mflags} * Don't comment out Url and Buildroot, and make sure Buildroot is set to one of the recommended values in the guidelines * You use /usr/share in %files .. use %{_datadir} instead * Why do you use AutoReq: no - is the versioning of the qpid libraries insufficient ? If so, you should raise that with them -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 02:27:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170227.m9H2RT14009237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #22 from jebba 2008-10-16 22:27:27 EDT --- * Thu Oct 16 2008 jeff - 0.97.7-6 - Add fmit-0.97.7-configure.patch - Add BuildRequires: qt3-devel libXi-devel - No BuildRequires: portaudio-devel qt-devel qt-designer - No %%configure --enable-debug I see where I earlier went astray. Earlier the QT test done by ./configure was failing. The reason for this was not qt*-devel per se, but a missing BuildRequires: for libXi-devel. The package is building with correct FLAGS now. The one liner patch simply comments out the line that reset the CXXFLAGS. Thanks for your help! :) ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170403.m9H43pn7023176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ding-Yi Chen 2008-10-17 00:03:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fbterm Short Description: a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device Owners: dchen Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170411.m9H4B1Uk024562@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170433.m9H4XOHM027331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #16 from jebba 2008-10-17 00:33:21 EDT --- I have also submitted a review request for mlt++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:32:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] New: Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Summary: Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: moe at blagblagblag.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt++.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.blagblagblag.org/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/mlt++-0.3.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This mlt sub-project provides a C++ wrapping for the MLT library. MLT is an open source multimedia framework, designed and developed for television broadcasting. ============= See also mlt review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:40:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:40:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] New: Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Summary: Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: otaylor at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.reinteract.org/~otaylor/reinteract.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinteract.org/~otaylor/reinteract-0.4.3-1.src.rpm Description: Reinteract is a system for interactive experimentation with Python. Reinteract worksheets contain Python code combined with the results of that code, formatted as text or graphical plots. Unlike a traditional shell, you can go back and edit previously entered statements, and the results will update. Among other things, Reinteract is suitable for experimentation with the Python language and for data analysis using the NumPy and SciPy libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170437.m9H4b7vr030611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 00:37:06 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170440.m9H4e0rI030828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 00:39:56 EDT --- Recent changes to the infrastructure permit us to sponsor folks with much less overhead, so I thought I'd take a look at our oldest pending needsponsor ticket. Honestly I think that anyone who still wants to get a package in after all this time deserves it. Unfortunately, though, the package in comment 9 fails to build for me, in both rawhide and F-9: RPM build errors: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pywbem-0.6-py2.5.egg-info Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pywbem-0.6-py2.5.egg-info You'll need to package up the egg-info file that python generates as well. The simplest way to do this that will also still work with F-8 (which doesn't generate the egg-info files) is to replace %{python_sitelib}/pywbem with %{python_sitelib}/* in your %files list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:45:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170445.m9H4j3FR029227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 00:45:00 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ochusha New Branches: F-10 Owners: mtasaka Early branching request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 04:59:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170459.m9H4xvLB030880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-17 00:59:56 EDT --- * The description needs to be descriptive. * Won't you need Requires: scummvm = %version instead of Requires: scummvm >= 0.12.0 * License should be GPLv2+ as told by the source files. * In the .desktop file - put a "Generic Name:" with a very brief description. - also it would be more comlpliant with the existing ScummVM package if you make the "Name: ScummVM Tools". - afaik you shouldn't have Application as a category in a .desktop file. * Compiler flags need to be appropriate. This is C++ code, so in order to honor Fedora specific compilation flags you will most likely need to play with the CXXFLAGS. Make sure they are not overridden by the other CXXFLAGS in the Makefile. You shouldn't set CFLAGS as it is irrelevant for this package. * Did you submit the patch upstream? * As far as I understood, this application is primarily used to extract information from non-free software, although most of which are now abandonware. I am not sure if this is OK to release in Fedora. I am blocking FE-Legal . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 05:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170508.m9H58eZX002436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 05:08:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170508.m9H58dwk002379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Depends on| |459979 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-17 01:08:38 EDT --- I think this package needs to wait until the pkg-config issue is solved. Also this one depends on mlt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 05:12:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 01:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170512.m9H5CQcN003346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 01:12:23 EDT --- I'm looking at some of the older tickets and thought I'd take care of this one. I'm sorry you've had to wait so long. Are you still interested in getting this package into Fedora? If so, I'll review it, but I need to note a couple of things. First off, rpmlint does spew a couple of complaints: python-urwid.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/urwid/str_util.so 0775 This one is some weird bug somewhere that has nothing to do with your package; occasionally the permissions on .so files built by python come out wrong. I have no idea what causes it, but we're just ignoring it as the packages generated by the buildsystem seem to come out OK. python-urwid.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.9.8.2-2 0.9.8.2-1.fc10 You have an entry for 0.9.8.2-2 (i.e release 2) but the spec has Release: 1. Also, it seems that 0.9.8.3 is out; would you like to update the package? It seems reasonable to package up the examples (those .py files in the top level which aren't setup.py) as documentation. Generally I'd recommend that you make them not executable but that's not necessary as long as they don't drag in additional dependencies. There is an actual test suite included as test_urwid.py which, surprisingly, seems to run standalone. You should call it in a %check section: %check %{__python} test_urwid.py We always want to run test suites when possible, since we want as many sanity checks as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 06:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170632.m9H6W133011197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-17 02:32:00 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream says "There is no public revision control system or publically released tarball for these programs so there is no tarball to list" there is a public revision control system, and im saying there should be public tarballs. this is something that could be useful and useable by more than spacewalk. spacewalk could also end up in other distros. a traball should be provided. otherwise it looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 07:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 03:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170759.m9H7xYs4026291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #14 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-17 03:59:32 EDT --- Hmm, I just wonder why package fedora-release (which is exactly same situation, fedora is upstream for that package) do not have direct link for tar.gz file? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/fedora-release/F-9/fedora-release.spec?revision=1.72&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 08:09:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170809.m9H89mVx029041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 08:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170809.m9H89Dq1028923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 04:09:11 EDT --- * rpmlint warnins are all ignorable (see above) ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4 ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/adobestd/adobe-std.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin5/iso8859-9 ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin1/iso8859-1.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin2/iso8859-2.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-t1mapgen ttf2pt1.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/ttf2pt1/encodings/latin4/iso8859-4.tbl ttf2pt1.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/convert.cfg.sample ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(Getopt::Long) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map perl(Getopt::Long) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/cjk-latex-config perl(English) ttf2pt1.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ttf2pt1-3.4.4/TeX/sfd2map perl(English) * follow guidelines * match upstream: cb143c07cc83167875ca09ea720d4932 ./ttf2pt1-3.4.4.tgz * %files section right Only one issue left, it doesn't build for me with %{_smp_mflags}. Log is at http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/ttf2pt1-failed.out My guess is that the 2 calls of scripts/html2man . . References: Message-ID: <200810170823.m9H8N4Jc028776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 08:23:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170823.m9H8N3qb028752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-pixman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 08:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467376] New: Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=5a13b9537a4127d600157e3cb12504542bd13651;path=/pixman/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pixman-0.12.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows pixman library. The approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 08:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 04:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170855.m9H8trZS002748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #2 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-17 04:55:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * The description needs to be descriptive. updated description > * Won't you need > Requires: scummvm = %version > instead of > Requires: scummvm >= 0.12.0 fixed > * License should be GPLv2+ as told by the source files. updated license > * In the .desktop file > - put a "Generic Name:" with a very brief description. > - also it would be more comlpliant with the existing ScummVM package if you > make the "Name: ScummVM Tools". > - afaik you shouldn't have Application as a category in a .desktop file. fixed > * Compiler flags need to be appropriate. This is C++ code, so in order to honor > Fedora specific compilation flags you will most likely need to play with the > CXXFLAGS. Make sure they are not overridden by the other CXXFLAGS in the > Makefile. You shouldn't set CFLAGS as it is irrelevant for this package. fixed > * Did you submit the patch upstream? patch submitted upstream Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools-0.12.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:08:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467384] New: Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/nsis/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-nsis-2.39-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: Nullsoft Scriptable Install System NSIS, the Nullsoft Scriptable Install System, is a script-driven Windows installation system. This package includes native Fedora binaries of makensis (etc.) and all plugins except for System.dll. The System.dll plugin cannot be built natively at this time since it includes inline Microsoft assembler code. The approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW Kevin Kofler has done some additional work to improve this package, so I'm going to ask him if we wouldn't mind taking a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170909.m9H993Tt006917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467384 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:09:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170909.m9H992JW006892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-nsis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:14:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:14:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170914.m9H9EOG5005756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467385 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467385] Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170914.m9H9ENlP005735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |467384 Alias| |mingw32-nsiswrapper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467385] New: Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467385 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-nsiswrapper - Helper program for making NSIS Windows installers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/nsiswrapper/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-nsiswrapper-3-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: NSISWrapper is a helper program for making Windows installers, particularly when you are cross-compiling from Unix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:21:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170921.m9H9Lu6k009559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467388] New: Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/pdcurses/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pdcurses-3.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PDCurses is a public domain curses library for MinGW / Windows. Note that ncurses doesn't compile on MinGW, and it looked like it was going to be very hard to port because it makes lots of Unix/POSIX API assumptions about terminals. This package includes some demos. They run under Wine as long as you use the 'wineconsole' program (ie. not 'wine'). The approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170928.m9H9SY6h008297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170927.m9H9RG6S010606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-pdcurses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:27:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170927.m9H9RGZM010632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:32:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170932.m9H9WuIW009140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:32:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467389] Review Request: mingw32-pthreads - MinGW pthread library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170932.m9H9Wt0G009114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-pthread - MinGW |mingw32-pthreads - MinGW |pthread library |pthread library Alias| |mingw32-pthreads -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:35:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467391] New: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/gdbm/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW I sent the MinGW-related patch upstream. However it looks to me like upstream for this project is dead. A few things require this package, like OCaml & Python. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467389] New: Review Request: mingw32-pthread - MinGW pthread library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pthread - MinGW pthread library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467389 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pthread - MinGW pthread library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/pthreads/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Win32 does not, and is unlikely to ever, support pthreads natively. This project seeks to provide a freely available and high-quality solution to this problem. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467391] Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170936.m9H9alc3012419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467391 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-gdbm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:36:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:36:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170936.m9H9am1I012444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 09:42:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 05:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810170942.m9H9glAQ013553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-17 05:42:45 EDT --- REVIEW: MUST Items: + rpmlint is silent + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2). + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ md5sum *tgz* a1b28e3ae6360c78eec36a019ca9f9e0 EnemyTerritory2.map.tgz a1b28e3ae6360c78eec36a019ca9f9e0 EnemyTerritory2.map.tgz.from_srpm 291cd52130399d096820c4b7be5c0b79 grass.map.tgz 291cd52130399d096820c4b7be5c0b79 grass.map.tgz.from_srpm 15664bb7e4a5cba8dff4fd0c2312691d greenlands.map.tgz 15664bb7e4a5cba8dff4fd0c2312691d greenlands.map.tgz.from_srpm 422adf97b62b52bd53247378b71c238e obese.map.tgz 422adf97b62b52bd53247378b71c238e obese.map.tgz.from_srpm 2cc7cecc8d96d0922fa53b5789e32636 plains.map.tgz 2cc7cecc8d96d0922fa53b5789e32636 plains.map.tgz.from_srpm ca7ae0e033458569086baa89b25233f5 turbo_grounds.map.tgz ca7ae0e033458569086baa89b25233f5 turbo_grounds.map.tgz.from_srpm b74176afba2ddb0cce0012b42e2d8e16 wargrounds.map.tgz b74176afba2ddb0cce0012b42e2d8e16 wargrounds.map.tgz.from_srpm 24a63c1d1682ff918ff0bab5b2112fdb wetlands03.map.tgz 24a63c1d1682ff918ff0bab5b2112fdb wetlands03.map.tgz.from_srpm [petro at host-12-116 SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (x86). + No additional build dependencies. + No need to deal with locales + Does not contain shared libraties + The package does not designed to be relocatable + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files + The package does not include anything as %doc + No header files + No static libraries + The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files + The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) + No devel packages + The package does not contain any .la libtool archives + Not a GUI application + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT . + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:09:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171009.m9HA97xb018658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #12 from Daniel Novotny 2008-10-17 06:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I've merged in your changes with mine that I've had to make while > testing/running 2.6.0p1. > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda.spec > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda-2.6.0p2-2.fc9.src.rpm hello Orion, your new .src.rpm does not contain all the patches you made, for example amanda-2.6.0b3-amdiskflush.patch is not there... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171018.m9HAI0Ls020458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:17:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171017.m9HAHxmV020438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:17:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171017.m9HAHSpS020340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-17 06:17:27 EDT --- How about getting in touch with the author and asking for clarifications and/or relicensing if needed ? maybe he wants to follow Perl's license, so he might agree with the current one used by Perl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171017.m9HAHGeL020279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-17 06:17:15 EDT --- elisa-base or elisa-common, both names sound reasonable. And no, the bottom of my comment 13 referred to elisa-plugins-good actually, not the main elisa package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:17:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467395] Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171017.m9HAHwlO020413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 454416 Alias| |mingw32-openssl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467395] New: Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467395 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-openssl - MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/openssl/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of the OpenSSL toolkit This is a not-very-straightforward port of the native Fedora package, including a dozen or so patches from native, and 5 MinGW-specific patches. The only major feature missing is IPv6 support. Approved MinGW guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171025.m9HAPSwV021809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 454416 Alias| |mingw32-freetype -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:25:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171025.m9HAPT1M021854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:24:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467396] New: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/freetype/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-freetype-2.3.7-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Freetype library The approved MinGW package guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:25:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171025.m9HAPS8a021833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171029.m9HAT8qA019248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:29:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171029.m9HAT7kQ019222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 454416 Alias| |mingw32-libpng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171029.m9HAT83Y019269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:28:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467397] New: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/libpng/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libpng-1.2.31-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Libpng library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171031.m9HAVtW4019972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467398 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:35:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171035.m9HAZREq020863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171035.m9HAZQOj020838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467399 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171031.m9HAVuBx019998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467398 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:35:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171035.m9HAZPow020812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467329 Alias| |mingw32-readline -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171031.m9HAVsjA019946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467325 Alias| |mingw32-gettext -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] New: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/gettext/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gettext-0.17-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW Note that there is no equivalent native Fedora package. This functionality is provided to native Fedora programs by glibc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467399] New: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/readline/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-readline-5.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines This is a relatively straightforward port of the native Fedora readline package + patches. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171039.m9HAdswe021513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171039.m9HAdrYH021488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171039.m9HAdqkH021467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:38:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171038.m9HAcPbY021287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171039.m9HAd4VJ021368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-17 06:39:03 EDT --- The main difference [that was interesting for me] is that this version allows arpinging based on MAC address. Unfortunately it does work only under some very specific conditions which made me give up in using it. Or in other words, I lost interest in it. It does not provide anything that I do not already have in nmap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171039.m9HAdpXI021439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 454416, 467397 Alias| |mingw32-libjpeg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:38:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171038.m9HAc9gm024019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #15 from Tim Potter 2008-10-17 06:38:08 EDT --- Hi Jason. Thanks for remembering me. (-: I've been a bit slack as well. I'll take a look at the build errors and update the bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:39:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467401] New: Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/libjpeg/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libjpeg-6b-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Libjpeg library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:45:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171045.m9HAjBn5022955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171042.m9HAgVwq022335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:42:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171042.m9HAgUYx022308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:45:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171045.m9HAjC7D022979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:42:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171042.m9HAgWmY022360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:42:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171042.m9HAgTXd022283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467325, 467398 Alias| |mingw32-glib2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:45:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171045.m9HAjA4T022931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467398 Alias| |mingw32-libgpg-error -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:41:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] New: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/glib2/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-glib2-2.18.1-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows GLib2 library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 10:44:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467403] New: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=82a0662b5376fe1a90612ed85628670c902a43d3;path=/libgpg-error/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgpg-error-1.6-8.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:05:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171105.m9HB5D8j026436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171105.m9HB5CUH026415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:05:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171105.m9HB5EaY026461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:03:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171103.m9HB31ab025845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-17 07:03:00 EDT --- New version: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.0.0-0.7.svn1095.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 17 2008 Peter Lemenkov 1.0.0-0.7.svn1095 - Fixed installation of audio files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171105.m9HB5B4W026393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com, | |veillard at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467398, 454416 Alias| |mingw32-libxml2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:04:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467405] New: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/libxml2/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libxml2-2.7.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:10:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467388] Review Request: mingw32-pdcurses - Curses library for MinGW In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171110.m9HBAW7f027668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467388 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467407] Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171110.m9HBAUkR027619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467388, 467399 Alias| |mingw32-sqlite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:10:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171110.m9HBAV8Z027643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171110.m9HBAXi7027693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467407 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:08:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467407] New: Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467407 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-sqlite - MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/sqlite/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-sqlite-3.5.9-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows port of sqlite embeddable SQL database engine Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:13:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171113.m9HBDw1Y028146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:13:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171113.m9HBDvWV028122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467408 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:13:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171113.m9HBDuQu028092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467401 Alias| |mingw32-jasper -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:13:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467408] New: Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/jasper/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-jasper-1.900.1-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Jasper library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW There are three MinGW-specific patches which need to be submitted upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:17:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171117.m9HBHunQ031281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171117.m9HBHrwJ031206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:17:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171117.m9HBHsVV031230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:17:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171117.m9HBHtjF031256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:17:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171117.m9HBHqMk031180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467325, 467398, | |467402 Alias| |mingw32-atk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:16:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467409] New: Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/atk/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-atk-1.24.0-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Atk library Approved MinGW guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467410] New: Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/libgcrypt/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libgcrypt-1.4.3-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:24:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171124.m9HBOs6O029964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:24:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171124.m9HBOqu1029916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467396, 467405 Alias| |mingw32-fontconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171124.m9HBOtSq029989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:24:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171124.m9HBOrqe029940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467413 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:21:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171121.m9HBLv0T032190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467403 Alias| |mingw32-libgcrypt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171121.m9HBLwJo032216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467413] New: Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/fontconfig/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-fontconfig-2.6.0-5.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Fontconfig library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:21:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171121.m9HBLxjt032241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:22:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171122.m9HBMXEc032320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #10 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-17 07:22:31 EDT --- source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: YES license is open source-compatible: YES (BSD) License text included in package: YES latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: YES compiler flags are appropriate: NO - look on http://people.redhat.com/atkac/unbound-build.patch. I think that patch should be included in main source. It shows build parameters %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): YES debuginfo package looks complete: YES rpmlint is silent: OK (messages written below are fine) unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/unbound unbound unbound.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/unbound unbound final provides and requires look sane: OK %check is present and all tests pass: OK (check is not present) no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths: NO - it seems that it is possible write "clients" for unbound. Due this reason I think the best will be create unbound-libs subpackage which will contain libunbound.so.0 and libunbound.so.0.14.0 libraries owns the directories it creates: YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: VERIFY - isn't better to make configuration files and chroot non-readable by "others"? scriptlets: NO - I think you should add unbound group as well. Look on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups Please correct/explain problematic points written above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:23:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467384] Review Request: mingw32-nsis - Nullsoft Scriptable Install System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171123.m9HBNB65032381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467384 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-17 07:23:10 EDT --- Here is the version I updated: Spec URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/mingw32-nsis.spec SRPM URL: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/mingw32-nsis-2.39-6.fc9.src.rpm This doesn't include your fix for the Summary: tag yet, but there are other important fixes in it: * Fri Oct 10 2008 Kevin Kofler - 2.39-6 - Disable the NSIS Menu (does not work on *nix). - Drop BR wxGTK-devel. * Fri Oct 10 2008 Kevin Kofler - 2.39-5 - Updated 64bit-fixes patch. - BR native (64-bit) wxGTK-devel instead of 32-bit, don't BR 32-bit glibc. - Obsoletes/Provides nsis and nsis-data for migration path from CalcForge. - Fix NSIS Menu not finding its Menu/index.html file. I also have a version which builds NSIS Menu, also without -m32, but the menu app doesn't actually work on Fedora, looks like it is Window$-only. Anyway, for reference, here's that version: http://repo.calcforge.org/f10/mingw32-nsis-2.39-5.fc9.src.rpm Note that these are NOT the packages currently in the CalcForge repository: the packages currently in CalcForge are not fully built from source, all the target DLLs (the plugins) are just copied from the binaries. The packages posted here are *built completely from source* (using mingw32-gcc to build the target stuff). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467376] Review Request: mingw32-pixman - MinGW Windows Pixman library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUmVb031605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467376 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUn5W031631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRv6a030888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454416] Review Request: mingw32-zlib - MinGW Windows zlib compression library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRsCE030815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRvgb030913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUlZ2031580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRrWH030795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRu31030864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRtr8030839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467414 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUkD1031555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467405, 467376, | |467396, 467397, 467413 Alias| |mingw32-cairo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171127.m9HBRrEY030771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467403, 467410, | |467325, 467398, 454416 Alias| |mingw32-gnutls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:29:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467416] New: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/cairo/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.7.4-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Cairo library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:27:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467414] New: Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/gnutls/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gnutls-2.4.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUoFd031660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUpSG031761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:30:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171130.m9HBUpci031712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467416 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467418] New: Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/libvirt/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-libvirt-0.4.6-7.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW Note that all the patches in this have been committed upstream, including the icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY5bm002191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY8gq002269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467410] Review Request: mingw32-libgcrypt - MinGW Windows gcrypt encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY7UI002243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY28X002111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467399] Review Request: mingw32-readline - MinGW port of readline for editing typed command lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY46P002166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467399 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY6LH002218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY14O002086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY35q002137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467418 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:34:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171134.m9HBY18Y002065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com, | |veillard at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467403, 467410, | |467414, 467398, 467405, | |467324, 467399 Alias| |mingw32-libvirt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467413] Review Request: mingw32-fontconfig - MinGW Windows Fontconfig library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbQl9000662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467413 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbPqP000632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbRah000712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467396] Review Request: mingw32-freetype - MinGW Windows Freetype library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbNIR000581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467396 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbLZe000530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbOl7000606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbKwa000501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467325, 467398, | |467416, 467396, 467413, | |467402 Alias| |mingw32-pango -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171137.m9HBbMVv000557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467419 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:35:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:35:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467419] New: Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/pango/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.21.6-6.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Pango library Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:39:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467420] New: Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/gtk2/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk2-2.14.2-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Gtk2 library Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467402] Review Request: mingw32-glib2 - MinGW Windows GLib2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf22x003977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467402 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467409] Review Request: mingw32-atk - MinGW Windows Atk library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf4sV004110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467409 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf5cs004162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467408] Review Request: mingw32-jasper - MinGW Windows Jasper library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf3PY004004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467408 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467397] Review Request: mingw32-libpng - MinGW Windows Libpng library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171140.m9HBexK4003902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467397 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467401] Review Request: mingw32-libjpeg - MinGW Windows Libjpeg library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf1T8003951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467401 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:40:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171140.m9HBewSh003849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf5E4004136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466762] Review Request: ipmitool - Utility for IPMI control In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171138.m9HBcAVE003257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466762 Jan Safranek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-17 07:38:08 EDT --- Thanks for review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467325] Review Request: mingw32-iconv - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171140.m9HBexv0003876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467325 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171141.m9HBf0WE003926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171140.m9HBevHP003824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467325, 467398, | |467402, 467416, 467408, | |467397, 467401, 467419, | |467409 Alias| |mingw32-gtk2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:43:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:43:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171143.m9HBheAc002019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171143.m9HBhcNI001965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:43:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467414] Review Request: mingw32-gnutls - MinGW Windows GnuTLS TLS/SSL encryption library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171143.m9HBhdsX001990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467414 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:43:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467421] Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171143.m9HBhbRv001939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410, 467420, 467414 Alias| |mingw32-gtk-vnc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:42:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467421] New: Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467421 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtk-vnc - MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=ea00554abe8421a9f5fb4506c9e6b35983a9005e;path=/gtk-vnc/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk-vnc-0.3.7-3.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows port of VNC client GTK widget Approved packaging guidelines for MinGW are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:52:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171152.m9HBqLIK006452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-17 07:52:20 EDT --- "Old" vnc is going to be replaced by tightvnc package in F11 which has already passed throught review process (bug #445537). vnc is is going to be dead in F11 so I think we don't have to waste time with vnc review. If you think vnc should be reviewed for F10 please reopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:55:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467422] New: F10 branch for vnc Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: F10 branch for vnc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Summary: F10 branch for vnc Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: atkac at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Early F10 branch for vnc package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 11:58:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467422] F10 branch for vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171158.m9HBw0NG007360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-17 07:57:59 EDT --- Please create F-10 branch for vnc Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vnc New Branches: F-10 Owners: atkac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 12:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171247.m9HCleAb016973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 08:47:39 EDT --- Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the best solution in my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 12:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171253.m9HCrsrv018218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #14 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-10-17 08:53:52 EDT --- All is well with me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 12:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171258.m9HCwJoH019234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-17 08:58:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ruby-pam Short Description: PAM bindings for ruby Owners: bkearney Branches: F-9 F10 InitialCC: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 13:39:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171339.m9HDdOb5027413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-17 09:39:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will > be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to > have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the > best solution in my opinion. +1, but what, functionally, would be the difference between a regular review and a merge review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 13:44:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171344.m9HDicGS030867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-17 09:44:37 EDT --- Unfortunately, this one isn't going to fly as is. In the code, it includes an mp3 encoder and decoder (code copied from lame), which is patent encumbered and non-permissable in Fedora. In order to make this acceptable for Fedora, you'd have to modify the source code such that it is no longer able to encode or decode in mp3 format, then make a new, mp3-free, tarball and use that for the base of the SRPM. I understand that may be too much of an inconvenience, so instead, you might consider submitting this package to rpmfusion (http://rpmfusion.org/). As for the package itself, I think it is acceptable in principle. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:16:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:16:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171416.m9HEGHZS003815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-17 10:16:16 EDT --- i spoke with upstream teeworlds 0.5 will be released in a few weeks bam is up to now unversioned. with teeworlds 0.5 bam will be versioned. perhaps we should really start with 0.5? what do you mean? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171432.m9HEW49D003952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-17 10:32:03 EDT --- > License: BSD It looks like MIT http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php with an advertising-clause. By comparison, this is the BSD licence: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:36:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171436.m9HEas16004753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski 2008-10-17 10:36:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I've merged in your changes with mine that I've had to make while > > testing/running 2.6.0p1. > > > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda.spec > > http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda-2.6.0p2-2.fc9.src.rpm > > hello Orion, your new .src.rpm does not contain all the patches you made, for > example amanda-2.6.0b3-amdiskflush.patch is not there... Ignore the separate .spec file, and just use the src.rpm. I must have accidentally posted the version that we use locally. I have some private patches that we use for doing disk based backups, but aren't suitable for general use. Sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171441.m9HEfoXL005624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 10:41:49 EDT --- I can checkout rxtx module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171450.m9HEoKgm007231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net --- Comment #4 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-17 10:50:19 EDT --- In case we want to shorten this a bit: SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libpcapnav/libpcapnav.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libpcapnav/libpcapnav-0.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Libpcapnav is a libpcap wrapper library that allows navigation to arbitrary packets in a tcpdump trace file between reads, using timestamps or percentage offsets. It was originally based on Vern Paxson's tcpslice tool. [athienem at localhost ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm libpcapnav-debuginfo.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/libpcapnav-0.8/src 02755 libpcapnav-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/src/debug/libpcapnav-0.8/src 02755 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. [athienem at localhost ~]$ Autogenerated packages, setgid error is ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 14:57:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171457.m9HEvP9H008511@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 10:57:24 EDT --- For me (also tried from fedorapeople.org) $ env LANG=C wget -N http://gstreamer-java.googlecode.com/files/gstreamer-java-src-1.0.tar.bz2 --2008-10-17 23:55:15-- http://gstreamer-java.googlecode.com/files/gstreamer-java-src-1.0.tar.bz2 Resolving gstreamer-java.googlecode.com... 74.125.47.82 Connecting to gstreamer-java.googlecode.com|74.125.47.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2008-10-17 23:55:16 ERROR 404: Not Found. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 15:11:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460887] Review Request: libpcapnav - a libpcap trace file navigation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171511.m9HFBj1r011340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460887 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-17 11:11:44 EDT --- This is it: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 15:20:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467422] F10 branch for vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171520.m9HFKFMv012915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atkac at redhat.com Component|Package Review |vnc AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 15:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171543.m9HFhEXS016927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #16 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-17 11:43:12 EDT --- 1.0 is not released yet. i'll not push gstreamer-java into fedora until 1.0 or another newer pre 1.0 will be released. since currently there is no working version because jna and gstreamer-java should have to be in pair. the latest mercurial is working with the latest jna (in rawhide, but even that version has a wrong 3.0.4 version number while it's in reality an svn version after 3.0.7). so i've to be wait for wayne (the upstream gstreamer-java maintainer) and colin (the fedora jna maintainer). anyway if you download the src.rpm it's contain the latesat svn source and it'll build on f9, f10, f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 16:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171625.m9HGP94a023832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-17 12:25:08 EDT --- Patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/proxy/proxy_ssl/source/library/proxycertinfo.c?r1=1.13&r2=1.14 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/proxy/proxy_ssl/source/library/proxypolicy.c?r1=1.8&r2=1.9 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/proxy/proxy_ssl/source/library/proxypolicy.h?r1=1.6&r2=1.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 16:45:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171645.m9HGjiv5026895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-17 12:45:44 EDT --- Doxygen patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/gssapi.h?r1=1.21&r2=1.22 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/inquire_cred.c?r1=1.11&r2=1.12 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/wrap.c?r1=1.15&r2=1.16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 16:52:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 12:52:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171652.m9HGqklV030556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 12:52:45 EDT --- So should this be closed now? Honestly the only thing I've ever needed arping for is to ping directly to a MAC address (for debugging weird single-segment-multiple-subnet routing problems) so I guess I can see the utility, but the package can't be accepted as long as it conflicts with iputils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171706.m9HH6xuo030486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 13:06:58 EDT --- in the other review it was renamed arping-ng. Anyway since there is nobody willing to submit this package, this should just be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:13:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171713.m9HHDQYJ031624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #5 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 13:13:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > +1, but what, functionally, would be the difference between a regular review > and a merge review? Not much, except that in Merge reviews it is often very unclear who is the reporter. Also another major difference is that the package is in fedora during the review which removes an incentive for reviewers and submitters. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:12:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171712.m9HHCFUr001732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 13:12:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > anyway if you download the src.rpm it's contain the latesat svn source - In such case please write in the spec file as comments how you created your source tarball: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control Also the EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of the rpm and the name of the tarball must contain the information of revision number: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages > and > it'll build on f9, f10, f11. - Unfortunately your latest srpm does not build either on F-10 or F-9... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=886325 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=886382 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:16:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171716.m9HHGfsW032294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 13:16:38 EDT --- looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:20:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:20:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171720.m9HHKoQH000547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net --- Comment #8 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-17 13:20:49 EDT --- As discussed with christian, I'm offering to do the review as I already did the same work and we'd be able to comaintain the package in the future: SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libnetdude/libnetdude.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libnetdude/libnetdude-0.11-1.fc9.src.rpm libnetdude allows to implement trace file manipulations at a much higher level of abstraction than code written directly on top of the pcap library. It also provides a command-line interface that directly lets you script all packet- mangling capabilities provided by the set of plugins you have installed. [athienem at localhost libnetdude]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [athienem at localhost libnetdude]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171737.m9HHbs6E003140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-17 13:37:53 EDT --- Doxygen patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/accept.c?r1=1.13&r2=1.14 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/display.c?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/export_sec_context.c?r1=1.5&r2=1.6 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/init.c?r1=1.15&r2=1.16 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/tokens_n.c?r1=1.7&r2=1.8 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/unwrap.c?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/wrap.c?r1=1.11&r2=1.12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171738.m9HHcjpS006144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-17 13:38:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > +1, but what, functionally, would be the difference between a regular review > > and a merge review? > > Not much, except that in Merge reviews it is often very unclear who is > the reporter. Also another major difference is that the package is in > fedora during the review which removes an incentive for reviewers and > submitters. Tell me about it. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:39:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171739.m9HHdBUu006203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-17 13:39:10 EDT --- Will you be sponsoring him then? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 17:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171758.m9HHwCC2009649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:01:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171801.m9HI1YbW007487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 Vladimir Ermakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |samflanker at gmail.com --- Comment #61 from Vladimir Ermakov 2008-10-17 14:01:33 EDT --- using SIM with GNOME after update no icq-icons(green flowers) on contact-list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:07:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171807.m9HI7i3V011426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #10 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 14:07:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > desktop-file-utils is already in cvs. this review is just a post core merge review. What does this exactly means? This package hasn't been reviewed already, it may not meet the criteria for inclusion in fedora. * does desktop-mime-type.prov really belong to that package? Looks like it should better be in redhat-rpm-config. * there are emacs guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs * the following comment is strange, certainly a leftover: # https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12018 * please don't mention GNOME and KDE in description, better use freedesktop or the like. All the window manager in fedora I know about use the .desktop files to create their menu. * Is there a reason why %_smp_mflag isn't used? * the source archive timestamp isn't kept, it is too late now, but please keep it next time -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 348871 Feb 11 2008 desktop-file-utils-0.15.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 348871 Mar 4 2008 desktop-file-utils-0.15.tar.gz-old * source match upstream 2fe8ebe222fc33cd4a959415495b7eed desktop-file-utils-0.15.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:17:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452211] Review Request: spu-binutils - Binutils for the SPU on IBM Cell processors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171817.m9HIHRj4010624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452211 Jochen Roth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:26:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465617] Review Request: gromacs3 - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171826.m9HIQcX2015033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465617 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:27:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171827.m9HIRuiL012501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-17 14:27:54 EDT --- For -6: * Python module dependency - Would you check python module dependency again? For example pmg_tk/startup/apbs_tools.py says ----------------------------------------------------- 46 47 import os,math 48 import Tkinter 49 from Tkinter import * 50 import Pmw ----------------------------------------------------- so this script requires tkinter (note: tkinter requires tk and tcl) And another example is that pmg_wx/__init__.py, which contains: ----------------------------------------------------- 22 import threading 23 import sys 24 from wxPython.wx import * 25 ----------------------------------------------------- This scripts requires wxPython. However these dependencies may be optional and I am not sure what python modules pymol requires _at least_. * optflags - build.log still says that compiler options "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3" are used: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=886320 Please patch these options out (I guess that changing ext_comp_args in setup.py will do this). ! Note that Fedora specific compilation flags should not be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:33:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171833.m9HIXkDP013658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-17 14:33:45 EDT --- So, no, the server shouldn't be included as a Requires, since they don't need to be on the same system. Nevertheless, it makes sense to include the server (and the python client code), so I've made packages for them as well: nwsclient: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 nwsserver: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467490 Their reviews can be done independently to this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:33:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467490] New: Review Request: nwsserver - NetWorkSpaces Server for clustering of scripting languages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nwsserver - NetWorkSpaces Server for clustering of scripting languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467490 Summary: Review Request: nwsserver - NetWorkSpaces Server for clustering of scripting languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsserver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsserver-1.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: NetWorkSpaces (NWS) is a powerful, open-source software package that makes it easy to use clusters from within scripting languages like Python, R, and Matlab. It uses a Space-based approach, similar to JavaSpaces (TM) for example, that makes it easier to write distributed applications. NWS looks and feels like a conventional workspace in the base scripting language, enables network script processes to share data, provides general distributed/parallel script execution, runs network script processes either uncoupled or coordinated, and dramatically increases developer productivity in implementing and maintaining distributed applications because of its anonymous communication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:32:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467489] New: Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467489 Summary: Review Request: nwsclient - NetWorkSpaces Client for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsclient.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/nwsclient-1.6.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: NetWorkSpaces (NWS) is a powerful, open-source software package that makes it easy to use clusters from within scripting languages like Python, R, and Matlab. It uses a Space-based approach, similar to JavaSpaces (TM) for example, that makes it easier to write distributed applications. NetWorkSpaces for Python is the Python API to the NetWorkSpaces server. It allows different Python scripts to communicate and coordinate with each other, and (with some restrictions) with scripts written in other languages, such as R and Matlab. The restriction is that only strings can be passed between different languages. NetWorkSpaces doesn't provide a standard way to serialize objects between different languages, but by allowing strings to be used, programmers can choose their own mechanism (XML or YAML, for example). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:38:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171838.m9HIcRIt014585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 14:38:26 EDT --- I don't think it makes sense to package a main iml package with only doc, just put everything in -devel. doc/liblink should be shipped. I don't really like the name, it is very short and prone to conflicts, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace I doubt that upstream is willing to reconsider th ename, though. I propose adding %check make check You could ship ChangeLog if you feel like it. rpmlint gives: iml.i386: E: no-binary iml-devel.i386: W: no-documentation iml-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package The 2 first should be fixed by removing main package. You can fix the 3rd if you want to (it is mandated by the guidelines, but I disagree, and I will approve even with this issue). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 18:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171849.m9HIn7Li016925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 14:49:04 EDT --- I'm trying to work through some of these old tickets; are you still interested in getting this package into Fedora? Some observations: Builds fine; rpmlint for me has only an erroneous complaint about permissions on the .so file. The page I get from visiting the URL doesn't seem to have anything at all to do with this software. Is there an actual upstream URL? Where goes genextdoc.py come from? You should provide its full location in Source1: if possible. Otherwise everything looks OK to me; just let me know if you'd like for me to do a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:01:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171901.m9HJ1xqC019454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-17 15:01:58 EDT --- Environment variable elimination patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/programs/grid-mapfile-add-entry.in?r1=1.9&r2=1.7 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gss_assist/source/programs/grid-mapfile-delete-entry.in?r1=1.9&r2=1.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:03:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171903.m9HJ3NcV022408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #11 from Ray Strode 2008-10-17 15:03:22 EDT --- desktop-file-utils is already included in fedora. Feel free to commit fixes for minor packaging issues you find with it. The ACL should be open on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:02:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171902.m9HJ29fR022311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 15:02:08 EDT --- I'm not understanding how this package can possibly provide things like "mingw32(kernel32.dll)" if it only contains directories, a text file and some shell scripts. The comment says: # These are actually provided by Windows itself, or Wine. but since this package doesn't have any dependency on, say, Wine, I don't understand how having the dependency in this package actually helps anything. Is there any documentation about this? The guidelines only say If a package contains binaries which depend on a DLL provided by another package, these dependencies should be expressed in the form: mingw32(foo.dll) but that doesn't actually talk about what should provide these symbols. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:13:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171913.m9HJDD3c021329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #31 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-17 15:13:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > For -6: > > * Python module dependency > - Would you check python module dependency again? > > For example pmg_tk/startup/apbs_tools.py says > ----------------------------------------------------- > 46 > 47 import os,math > 48 import Tkinter > 49 from Tkinter import * > 50 import Pmw > ----------------------------------------------------- > so this script requires tkinter (note: tkinter > requires tk and tcl) > Right, but python-pmw pulls tkinter in already. > And another example is that pmg_wx/__init__.py, > which contains: > ----------------------------------------------------- > 22 import threading > 23 import sys > 24 from wxPython.wx import * > 25 > ----------------------------------------------------- > This scripts requires wxPython. > However these dependencies may be optional and > I am not sure what python modules pymol requires > _at least_. > wxPython can be used as an alternative to tcl/tk, but is optional. I guess in which case the pmg_wx module should be removed? > * optflags > - build.log still says that compiler options "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3" > are used: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=886320 > Please patch these options out (I guess that changing ext_comp_args > in setup.py will do this). > ! Note that Fedora specific compilation flags should not be > removed. doh! Fixed. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-7.20081015svn3468.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:18:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171918.m9HJIIiw024936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #62 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-17 15:18:17 EDT --- Vladimir Ermakov to which version update? From which version? Please can you open separate bug for this and provide more info?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:37:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171937.m9HJbwBr026104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #8 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-10-17 15:37:57 EDT --- [ondrejj at builder tmp]$ rpmlint sems-1.0.0-0.7.svn1095.src.rpm sems.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 116, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Also other problems describe in this bug are still present. Please, tell me, when this package will be ready for next review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 19:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810171940.m9HJesjF030003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 15:40:53 EDT --- I've decided not to review this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172000.m9HK0gC5002193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 16:00:41 EDT --- It seems pretty obvious that this is under the plain Artistic license, which is not acceptable for Fedora. Please contact the author (who is obviously active as a new version has come out) and see if they would be willing to license under either the same license as Perl or either Artistic 2.0 or the clarified Artistic license (or any of the other acceptable licenses). I'll go ahead and block FE-Legal; I'm sure spot will correct me if I've erred somewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:11:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172011.m9HKBC1R032410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 16:11:11 EDT --- Odd; this failed to build for me in my local mock, and it fails in the buildsys in the same way: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=886764 I wonder what could have changed in the last four days. Oh, somehow your scratch build is of version 1.6, but the package you've posted is version 1.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:11:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172011.m9HKBWJr032461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-17 16:11:31 EDT --- Windows DLLs are a complex beast. A DLL actually contains two parts, one used at runtime and one used at link time. Most of the mingw32 packages we're adding will contain both parts (one part lives in 'bin', the other in 'lib), but the core Windows system DLLs are a special case. They can be provided in many different ways, by Windows itself, by Wine, or (partially) by Mingw toolchain. If you want to run the packages, then Wine would provide the actual DLLs, but if you're compiling & linking, the combination of the mingw runtime, w32apis & gcc packages contain the magic parts neccessary for Windows system packages. It might be better if these fake provides were part of 'mingw-runtime' or 'mingw-w32apis', but in the end it doesn't make a whole lot of difference - there's never any package with a true kenrel32.dll involved in mingw32, so some package needs the fake provides regardless -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:21:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] New: Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Summary: Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rufscript-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/rufscript-fonts-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Rufscripts is a handwriting based font suitable for comic scripts and small labels. It is created using completely free and open source tools. Notes: Other than a warning about missing documentation (we don't have any), rpmlint is clean but do check the conf file and other details for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172029.m9HKTJ4u007647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 16:29:18 EDT --- Not much to say here, really. I guess I could point out that most people tend to prefer calling iconv over patching to fix utf8 issues, but that's up to you. * source files match upstream: 4274d1aedcdd6e5ad54f417390dae75bc9231726c7431ab1aee40a507b3748c3 Crypt-GeneratePassword-0.03.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Crypt::GeneratePassword) = 0.03 perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword = 0.03-3.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and the one test passes. It's about the minimal useful test suite you can get for a Perl module, but it's there. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172036.m9HKacEE005563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-17 16:36:37 EDT --- Thank you Randall, thank you Jon License Tag: GPLv2+ Desktop file: Sorry, but I don't know what you mean. ---- Update to 0.85 SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead-0.85-1.fc10.src.rpm ---- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172022.m9HKMLP1006574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-17 16:22:20 EDT --- I'm passing this on to the lawyers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 20:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172053.m9HKr9CU009488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:00:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172100.m9HL0mQv015049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #34 from Andrew Overholt 2008-10-17 17:00:47 EDT --- This looks good to me, Rob. I'll do a closer check on Monday but my one suggestion right now is to change the %files line to be: %{eclipse_base}/dropins/anyedit instead of the explicit plugin since that way you own the directories too. Also, note that it's not strictly required to do gcj stuff if you don't want to (I actually disabled it in my test build since I don't have gcj installed). Oh, and I guess you should make the requirement on eclipse-platform be >= 3.4.0 since dropins is new in 3.4 and wasn't in 3.3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462923] Review Request: jibx - Framework for binding XML data to Java objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172103.m9HL3hBu015534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462923 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-10-17 17:03:42 EDT --- Was trying to test RoM , it gave Koji Scratch build error Read the log at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=886868&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:14:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172114.m9HLEiHJ017372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-17 17:14:43 EDT --- Indeed, this builds fine. I get one rpmlint complaint: libfplll-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which is indeed correct but also not an issue. Normally I'd complain about obscure acronyms which aren't explained in the package description, but I'm not sure that "Lenstra-Lenstra-Lovascz" is any clearer than "LLL". I will point out that the use of "oblivious" in the description doesn't really make any sense because a "succession of variants" can't have conscious awareness in the first place. I'm not sure what they really mean. Maybe "immaterial". But that's just nitpicking. There's a test suite; you should call it (with "make check" in a %check section). I'm not sure how to interpret the results but a quick read of the code indicates that calls to llldiff should produce no output if there are no problems, and that seems to be the case in my tests. The "generate" command is incredibly generic; I don't think this package can be approved with a binary of that name. fplll-generate would make sense. The header files install directory into /usr/include with very generic names (/usr/include/defs.h, for example). These will need to be either renamed or moved into a subdirectory. * source files match upstream: 04f630a4d939f4fc1c721c57c921a2e940efb8b315adca6f994192220326aeb7 libfplll-3.0.9.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libfplll-3.0.9-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libfplll.so.0()(64bit) libfplll = 3.0.9-1.fc10 libfplll(x86-64) = 3.0.9-1.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libfplll.so.0()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.0.0)(64bit) libgmp.so.3()(64bit) libmpfr.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.9)(64bit) libfplll-devel-3.0.9-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm libfplll-devel = 3.0.9-1.fc10 libfplll-devel(x86-64) = 3.0.9-1.fc10 = libfplll = 3.0.9-1.fc10 libfplll.so.0()(64bit) X %check is not present, but should be. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig called properly. * unversioned .so files are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. X generically named files. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:21:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172121.m9HLLb6W015026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-17 17:21:36 EDT --- http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/iml.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/iml-1.0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172144.m9HLiCTh021930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-17 17:44:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > ... > > The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package > reviews recently, please consider doing one. I think maybe I'm doing something wrong w.r.t. reviews -- it seems to take quite a long time (a substantial portion of an hour for the first pass through the list of requirements) and I miss basic things that aren't mentioned in the packaging guidelines. I eagerly look forward to the review-o-matic helper mentioned on fedora-devel-list. All the same I very much appreciate your feedback! New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/libfplll.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/libfplll-3.0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 21:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172151.m9HLpIaH023299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-10-17 17:51:17 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic. Koji Scratch build error. Read the log at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=886950&name=root.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 22:21:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172221.m9HML7Ip024980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-17 18:21:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320728) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320728) file spec patch to implement request of the review Please review and tell me if you want the whole patch to be applied. If yes I'll apply and rebuild, if no, please apply what you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 22:22:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447075] RFE: Add the ssh-vulnkey command to detect weak SSH keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172222.m9HMMeHF025181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447075 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|distribution |Package Review Version|9 |rawhide AssignedTo|notting at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact|notting at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 22:40:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172240.m9HMedAm031275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-17 18:40:37 EDT --- Basically, what Daniel said in comment 4. I'll explain it in slightly different terms:- Let's say we build zlib (bug 454416). When we run our find-requires script as part of rpmbuild, they will find the list of DLLs which zlib1.dll depends on. In the particular case of zlib, it's KERNEL32.dll & msvcrt.dll. These are in the "normal" case proprietary, non-free Windows binaries. So the question arises, how did we build zlib1.dll given that we don't have these proprietary libraries around? We built them from the w32api package, which is a Public Domain set of header files that duplicate the headers found in Windows dev kits, and provide stubs. As Dan explained, Windows DLLs really come in two parts - the library of functions itself and a set of stub routines that you link to the caller. In w32api the stubs are in %{_mingw32_libdir}/libkernel32.a, which is compiled from public domain source by our open source gcc/binutils toolchain.[*] We want to be able to build & install mingw32-zlib without necessarily needing to install wine. (And certainly not needing to install Windows!) There is no requirement to have wine installed in order to use the mingw toolchain to develop software (ie. to compile more stuff on top of it), so why require that? So for expediency, this base package "provides" the "missing" DLLs. Another way to do it would be to exclude these proprietary DLLs in our find-requires checking script - essentially it comes out the same either way. [*] If it sounds like I'm over-emphasizing the completely free / open source nature of this, then I am. People don't believe that this can be built from 100% Free (as in speech) software, but it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 17 22:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810172253.m9HMrVb0000983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #6 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-17 18:53:31 EDT --- email to the author has been send already earlier today, no response so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 00:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180056.m9I0uXiF019451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #63 from Vladimir Ermakov 2008-10-17 20:56:32 EDT --- version - current sim-0.9.5-0.14.20080923svn2261rev.fc9.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 00:58:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460885] Review Request: netdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180058.m9I0wUMQ019556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460885 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net --- Comment #4 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-17 20:58:28 EDT --- Hi Chris, as discussed via email, the last packaging suggestion: SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/netdude.spec SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/netdude-0.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Files: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/netdude/ [root at localhost ~]# rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-*/result/*.rpm 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [root at localhost ~]# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 01:03:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] New: Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Summary: Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andreas at bawue.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/ladvd/ladvd.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/ladvd/ladvd-0.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Files: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/ladvd/ Description: ladvd uses cdp / lldp frames to inform switches about connected hosts, which simplifies ethernet switch management. Every 30 seconds it will transmit CDP/ LLDP packets reflecting the current system state. Interfaces (bridge, bonding, wireless), capabilities (bridging, forwarding, wireless) and addresses (IPv4, IPv6) are detected dynamically. rpmlint is silent: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 03:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 23:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467535] New: Review Request: SocksiPy - Easy to use SOCKS client support for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SocksiPy - Easy to use SOCKS client support for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467535 Summary: Review Request: SocksiPy - Easy to use SOCKS client support for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: konrad at tylerc.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/SocksiPy.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/SocksiPy-1.00-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This module was designed to allow developers of Python software that uses the Internet or another TCP/IP-based network to add support for connection through a SOCKS proxy server with as much ease as possible. Note: This is a *tiny* little python module to help python applications be SOCKS clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 04:43:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180443.m9I4hPbB014097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #13 from Ray Strode 2008-10-18 00:43:24 EDT --- Everything looks good but removing the .prov file. If you think it should go in redhat-rpm-config or whatever, we should get it there first before taking it out here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 07:55:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 03:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180755.m9I7tda1009706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2008-10-18 03:55:38 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887113 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 08:09:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 04:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180809.m9I89frE008223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kushaldas at gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Kushal Das 2008-10-18 04:09:41 EDT --- Above comment came due to a bug in review-o-matic, we are testing it in the intial stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 08:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 04:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810180811.m9I8BQp8008898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #9 from Kushal Das 2008-10-18 04:11:25 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887113 libkni-devel.i386: W: no-documentation libkni-devel.ppc64: W: no-documentation libkni-devel.ppc: W: no-documentation libkni-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libkni-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.ppc64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.ppc64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.ppc: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.ppc: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/Timer_8h__incl.map libkni-doc.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libkni-docs-3.9.2/html/MathHelperFunctions_8h__incl.map libkni-examples.i386: W: no-documentation libkni-examples.ppc64: W: no-documentation libkni-examples.ppc: W: no-documentation libkni-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation libkni-static.i386: W: no-documentation libkni-static.ppc64: W: no-documentation libkni-static.ppc: W: no-documentation libkni-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation 26 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 10:12:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 06:12:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181012.m9IACknb028636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-18 06:12:45 EDT --- I've built this package for F-9 and F-10 and it seems to be running acceptably on both. What is the procedure now? Does the package need to be imported into the most recent release before the review is considered closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 11:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181103.m9IB3pE3007390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Bug 441378 depends on bug 465710, which changed state. Bug 465710 Summary: Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 11:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465710] Review Request: perl-qooxdoo-compat - Perl backend for Qooxdoo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181103.m9IB3oqh007362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465710 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 07:03:48 EDT --- Things is in shape again, imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 11:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181115.m9IBFQ5a009682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #27 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 07:15:24 EDT --- One more update to celebrate that ?465710 is closed. - fix README.fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=887265&name=smokeping-2.4.2-6.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 11:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 07:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466024] Review Request: teamgit - Visual tool for Git In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181143.m9IBhLAu013834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466024 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 07:43:19 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 12:13:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181213.m9ICDrZ4019815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 08:13:52 EDT --- - Upstream patch refs - Fix license spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/logstalgia/logstalgia.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=887396&name=logstalgia-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887395 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 14:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181444.m9IEiIkP006504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 10:44:16 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 14:52:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181452.m9IEq03v007648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 10:51:58 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 14:57:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181457.m9IEvcJA008272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 10:57:37 EDT --- For F-9 package please submit a request to push the rebuilt packages to repositories on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Then you can close this bug as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 16:02:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181602.m9IG2xxl016791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 12:02:58 EDT --- For -7: (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > * Python module dependency > > - Would you check python module dependency again? > > For example pmg_tk/startup/apbs_tools.py says > > so this script requires tkinter (note: tkinter > > requires tk and tcl) > Right, but python-pmw pulls tkinter in already. - Ah, okay. Thanks. > > And another example is that pmg_wx/__init__.py, > > This scripts requires wxPython. > > However these dependencies may be optional and > > I am not sure what python modules pymol requires > > _at least_. > wxPython can be used as an alternative to tcl/tk, but is optional. I guess in > which case the pmg_wx module should be removed? - No need to remove. However it is also a good idea to create a subpackage (like -wxpython), then split wxPython related files to that subpackage. > > * optflags > > - build.log still says that compiler options "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3" > > are used: > doh! Fixed. - Well, about how to apply a patch in the spec file see the explanation http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch09s04.html and the example: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/pcmanfm/devel/pcmanfm.spec?view=co -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 16:25:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181625.m9IGPxQS024279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 12:25:56 EDT --- To Nicolas: If you have some suggestion and have your own srpm for this package, would you post it somewhere where we can download it anytime? (don't use koji site for the place to put your srpm: it is deleted within one week or so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 16:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181635.m9IGZAce021984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ankur at ankurs.com) --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 12:35:07 EDT --- 2.0 seems released. Pavel, would you check if the issue reported by Michael is resolved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 16:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181636.m9IGa5Mp022218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(ken+5a4 at bonsai.co | |m) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-18 12:36:02 EDT --- Would someone update the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 16:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 12:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181646.m9IGkfSN026968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sergio.pasra at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:08:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181708.m9IH8Wjn029828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-18 13:08:30 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint output is ignorable: openalchemist.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/openalchemist-config + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (GPLv2+ and CC-BY-SA). + File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 3107b699d63d5ae7cbf65ddc9872c49a openalchemist-0.3-src.tar.gz 3107b699d63d5ae7cbf65ddc9872c49a openalchemist-0.3-src.tar.gz.orig + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture (x86). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to deal with locales. + Does not contain shared libraries. + The package does not designed to be relocatable. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + Does not contain large documentation files. + Includes only doc files in $doc. + No headers. + No static libraries. + The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). + No devel packages. + The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. + Includes .desktop file. Properly installed with desktop-file-install. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181720.m9IHKSRM028110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #15 from G?ran Uddeborg 2008-10-18 13:20:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > My guess is that the 2 calls of > scripts/html2man . . trigger a logical race condition. I haven't been hit by this myself. But when I look at it, I see it obviously could happen. It would probably be possible to explain to make, using pattern rules or so, that a single command creates both manual pages. But given the small size of this package it's not worth the trouble. I'll remove %{_smp_mflags}. > This is APPROVED if you remove %{_smp_mflags}, Sounds good. I'll continue with the next step, to get to know koji. (After the F10 translation deadline on Tuesday.) > I will approve you as packager. Are you saying you will (and have the right to) "sponsor" me in the terms of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Or is that yet another step? > ... I would happily have given you this level of trust > but being more on the safe side is good, so for now you'll be only > packager That's certainly perfectly fine with me! I AM learning. (Besides, I've been sysadming enough in my days to know that it could at times be advantageous NOT to have privileges. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:28:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181728.m9IHS21w028929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-18 13:28:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: boswars-addons Short Description: Addon maps for Bos Wars real-time strategy game Owners: atorkhov Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181734.m9IHYWls029863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #16 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-18 13:34:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > > I will approve you as packager. > > Are you saying you will (and have the right to) "sponsor" me in the terms of > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Or is that yet another > step? Indeed I am a sponsor and will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:42:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181742.m9IHgP0b002107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-18 13:42:24 EDT --- I have added the dependence in desktop-file-utils to build the package. * In Source0 you can use the %{name} macro instead of puzzles if you want * BuildRequires: sed is in the exception list, so it can be safely removed. Perl it isn't but is pulled anyway. You can remove it also or leave it to be in the safe side. You have to add desktop-file-utils too. * Source doesn't match upstream source (there is a new version upstream) * In description there's a typo: this is a collection -> This is a colection * In %setup, you can run sed in place with sed -e "s/CFLAGS = .*-g/CFLAGS = %{optflags}/" -i Makefile * The naming of the binaries seems problematic. For example, there is a blackbox package that provides /usr/bin/blackbox already in Fedora. Other puzzles have very generic names: cube, guess, map, mines... I suggest you to rename all the puzzles, something like puzzle_name or puzzle-name * You are putting the desktop files in a directory inside /usr/share/applications. I think is clearer to put them all in the main directory and use a prefix if necessary (the different openoffice applications follow this approach) * The license text must be included in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 17:55:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: brickshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181755.m9IHtIXf000792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-18 13:55:17 EDT --- Fixed most of the problems and would like to become some feedback... Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/kcirbshooter.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/kcirbshooter-0.04-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 18:02:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181802.m9II2r95001925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-10-18 14:02:52 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887703 rufscript-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 18:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181830.m9IIUeNs005866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #6 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 14:30:38 EDT --- Jussi, do you want to continue the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 19:09:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810181909.m9IJ93ge010890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 --- Comment #8 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-18 15:09:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Based on upstream's response, I think removing demo.py and test.py from > %{buildroot} is the best thing to do. E.g.: > That's what I hav done. Additionally I have included html documentation Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/gnuplot-py-1.8-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:02:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182002.m9IK23ve018222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 16:02:02 EDT --- All e16 packages are named e16-*, however no big issue to rename this one to e16keyedit. Updated package: - Add desktop file spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-keyedit.spec srpm: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=887831&name=e16-keyedit-0.5-3.fc11.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=887830 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:20:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182020.m9IKKBRB021092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-18 16:20:10 EDT --- Sure, now that I got packager status. SHOULD: Now the buildrequires section is IMHO not very clean. Please break the BR one per line in alphabetized order. But you can do this when you import the package. The only thing missing in the preliminary review was the desktop file installation and you've fixed that, the package is ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:28:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182028.m9IKSGq4022055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 16:28:15 EDT --- Please set correct Status and Assigned To, do this before you start the review. I will put br's in alphabetized order, however on a single line. Where is the one br per line policy coming from? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182031.m9IKVjYp025817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182040.m9IKexoX024021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.d | |e --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-18 16:40:58 EDT --- My english is maybe worse, but I would say "A unique" because the "u" is pronounced as "j" so just "a" not "an", right? Sorry... ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182043.m9IKh1p8024148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-18 16:43:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Please set correct Status and Assigned To, do this before you start the review. Thanks for the tip :) > I will put br's in alphabetized order, however on a single line. > > Where is the one br per line policy coming from? I don't think it's a policy per se; my sponsor (Dominik) told me about it. And he is right: even though you have to spend a minute or two typing the BRs in this way, the end result is a lot cleaner to look at. You can see on one glance what kind of software the package requires. When you have many requires per line, you have to spend more time looking around; when you have everything nicely in a column the list is much faster to look through. Since your other packages also have the same kind of BRs and they have passed their reviews without problems, I won't make a fuss out of this. Decide for yourself: which of these is nicest to read? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lynx/F-9/lynx.spec?revision=1.55&view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/firefox/F-9/firefox.spec?revision=1.304&view=markup http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/evolution/F-8/evolution.spec?revision=1.313&view=markup -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182050.m9IKo7XR028435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-18 16:50:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320769) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320769) biniax-1.2-optflags.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182049.m9IKnxt2028111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris.stone at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Christopher Stone 2008-10-18 16:49:58 EDT --- http://www.englishonline.org.cn/en/learners/vocabulary-grammar/grammar-questions/a-or-an -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 20:52:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182052.m9IKqZLD028719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Ken Sedgwick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ken+5a4 at bonsai.co | |m) | --- Comment #18 from Ken Sedgwick 2008-10-18 16:52:34 EDT --- Here is the new version: Spec URL: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.6-1/ace-tao.spec SRPM URL: http://dist.bonsai.com/ken/ace_tao_rpm/SRC/5.6.6-1/ace-tao-5.6.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) is a freely available, open-source object-oriented (OO) framework that implements many core patterns for concurrent communication software. ACE provides a rich set of reusable C++ wrapper facades and framework components that perform common communication software tasks across a range of OS platforms. The communication software tasks provided by ACE include event demultiplexing and event handler dispatching, signal handling, service initialization, interprocess communication, shared memory management, message routing, dynamic (re)configuration of distributed services, concurrent execution and synchronization. TAO is a real-time implementation of CORBA built using the framework components and patterns provided by ACE. TAO contains the network interface, OS, communication protocol, and CORBA middleware components and features. TAO is based on the standard OMG CORBA reference model, with the enhancements designed to overcome the shortcomings of conventional ORBs for high-performance and real-time applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 21:01:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182101.m9IL1vuJ026873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-18 17:01:55 EDT --- I see the point, something to consider. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: simdock Short Description: Fast and customizable dockbar Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 21:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 17:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182131.m9ILV5vp030734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-18 17:31:04 EDT --- Fixed Version Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm To your last point: I cant reproduce that on Fedora 8 (x86), Fedora 9 (ppc) and Rawhide (x86). Biniax exit without problems. Thanks to Robert for the patch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 22:50:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:50:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182250.m9IMorFO008666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-18 18:50:52 EDT --- gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnomint-0.5.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 18 23:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 19:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: PyMOL - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810182331.m9INVY4s013640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #33 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-18 19:31:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > For -7: > > (In reply to comment #31) > > (In reply to comment #30) > > > And another example is that pmg_wx/__init__.py, > > > This scripts requires wxPython. > > > However these dependencies may be optional and > > > I am not sure what python modules pymol requires > > > _at least_. > > wxPython can be used as an alternative to tcl/tk, but is optional. I guess in > > which case the pmg_wx module should be removed? > - No need to remove. However it is also a good idea to create a subpackage > (like -wxpython), then split wxPython related files to that subpackage. > Good idea - done in -8. > > > * optflags > > > - build.log still says that compiler options "-ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3" > > > are used: > > doh! Fixed. > - Well, about how to apply a patch in the spec file see > the explanation > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/drafts/rpm-guide-en/ch09s04.html > and the example: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/pcmanfm/devel/pcmanfm.spec?view=co Ah, thanks. Fixed. spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-8.20081015svn3468.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 00:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190003.m9J03QMr020760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2008-10-18 20:03:25 EDT --- Thanks for the review Alexey. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openalchemist Short Description: Puzzle game Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 00:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190043.m9J0huew025906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #10 from Peter Scheie 2008-10-18 20:43:55 EDT --- This package is only used on the K12Linux Live image and only exists to make LTSP easier to get working. So, while it might generically be about binding the virtual bridge to an interface, shifting the focus/name to that would only confuse the very people for whom it is intended, which is new users of K12Linux. (BTW, is it okay to address multiple comments in one message, or should I create a separate comment for each point raised?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 03:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190335.m9J3ZAFt013280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 Nathaniel McCallum changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs at natemccallum.com --- Comment #7 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-10-18 23:35:09 EDT --- Hi, I'm one of the authors of libproxy. I'd like to suggest that my preferred method of packaging libproxy is *not* to create separate binary packages for each plugin. I know this flies in the face of conventional wisdom. However, libproxy is designed to always do the best with what is given. If a certain dependency is not met for a plugin, the plugin will simply fail to load. It will be far more confusing for the user to have all these plugin packages, then for libproxy simply to work for them. What outstanding issues remain for libproxy to be in Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 06:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463123] Review Request: gnomint - Graphical x509 Certification Authority management tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190645.m9J6jlOB008143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463123 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-19 02:45:46 EDT --- Okay, thanks. When you think the rebuilt packages can be moved from testing to stable repository, please modify (edit) the submitted push request. Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 08:44:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464430] Review Request: ltsp-server-livesetupdocs - Doc describing how to enable LTSP on Fedora Live LTSP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190844.m9J8i4Tk022969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464430 --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 04:44:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > This package is only used on the K12Linux Live image and only exists to make > LTSP easier to get working. So, while it might generically be about binding > the virtual bridge to an interface, shifting the focus/name to that would only > confuse the very people for whom it is intended, which is new users of > K12Linux. I haven't proposed to make that package generic, but to explain better what it does. I have proposed specific changes and in these changes the focus is still on ltsp, but there is also an explanation of what the package does. > (BTW, is it okay to address multiple comments in one message, or should I > create a separate comment for each point raised?) You can address multiple comments in one message. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 08:55:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 04:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810190855.m9J8tqwn024941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #8 from Adel Gadllah 2008-10-19 04:55:51 EDT --- > What outstanding issues remain for libproxy to be in Fedora? Nothing, Nicolas has to import and build it... ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 10:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191022.m9JAMUYS010084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 06:22:29 EDT --- * rpmlint gives: iml-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package which is against the guidelines, but I don't think this is important (and besides I think it is a bug in rpm, not to have debug info extracted from static libs). * follow relevant guidelines * free software, no license included because upstream doesn't ship a license consistent with the code * match upstream: 03a2e361bf9574ae8d32c19a392eeb66 iml-1.0.2.tar.gz * all static correctly packaged library * %files section right One suggestion, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' too tentatively keep header file timestamps. Also you should contact upstream to ask them to change the COPYING file. (well in fact the license isn't that clear when repl/ is used, but it isn't th ecase in fedora, and in any case they should clarify the license). APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 10:34:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191034.m9JAYPSq008075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-19 06:34:25 EDT --- Thanks for the suggestions, I really value them. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iml Short Description: Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 10:44:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191044.m9JAiq7N013363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #17 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 06:44:50 EDT --- When you have applied for sponsorship, tell here what is your account name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 10:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252108] Review Request: python-html5lib - A python based HTML5 parser/tokenizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191042.m9JAgak0013157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252108 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #19 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 06:42:33 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 11:25:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 07:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191125.m9JBPXG3019999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #39 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 07:25:30 EDT --- I you have rpms, I'd like to look at the files to see where differences are. I tried a scratch build, but it failed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=888335 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 12:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191209.m9JC9eeI023776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 --- Comment #13 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 08:09:38 EDT --- Review for release 1.fc10: * RPM name is OK * Source vim-7.2.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Source vim-7.2-lang.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Source vim-7.2-extra.tar.gz is the same as upstream * Source forth.vim is the same as upstream * This is the latest version * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of vim-minimal looks OK * rpmlint of vim-X11 looks OK * rpmlint of vim-debuginfo looks OK * rpmlint of vim-enhanced looks OK * rpmlint of vim-common looks OK * File list of vim-minimal looks OK * File list of vim-X11 looks OK * File list of vim-debuginfo looks OK * File list of vim-enhanced looks OK * File list of vim-common looks OK * Config files of vim-minimal looks OK * Config files of vim-enhanced looks OK * Config files of vim-common looks OK Needs work: * Desktop file: the Categories tag should not contain Application any more (wiki: Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the category Application is not valid (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) * As vim ships icons in the hicolor directory, it should have "Requires: hicolor-icon-theme" https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-September/msg00282.html * A few rpmlint warnings: [ruben at slice vim]$ rpmlint vim-common-7.2.022-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm | grep spurious vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_ami.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_amibin.txt.info vim-common.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/vim-common-7.2.022/README_amisrc.txt.info * Like Robert said in comment #11, the man directories are not owned by any package, please resolve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 12:27:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191227.m9JCRtZp031017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #11 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 08:27:54 EDT --- I'd suggest dropping COPYING since it is the GPL and not the LGPL. Also the README is useless in my opinion. using make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' may keep timestamps of include files. install-info knows automatically how to deal with compression, please remove the .gz from install-info invocations. I would also suggest using %{_infodir}/%{name}.info* to catch different compression or no compression. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 12:35:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191235.m9JCZeR2028805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 08:35:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320799) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320799) simple patch for spec file keep timestamp of man page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 12:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463140] Review Request: dfu-util - USB Device Firmware Update tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191239.m9JCdJc0000340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463140 --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-19 08:39:17 EDT --- Juha have you done any other work in fedora (comment on reviews, other submissions, and anything else) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 12:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226536] Merge Review: webalizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191246.m9JCkULR001770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226536 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jorton at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #23 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 08:46:29 EDT --- Joe, can you have a look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 14:59:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191459.m9JEx4ps021025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 Stefan Seefeld changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico | |.ca) | --- Comment #51 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-10-19 10:59:00 EDT --- Sorry for my silence. In addition to general business, I have been debating whether or not to submit another package of mine for inclusion into Fedora (which, as I understand, is one way to become sponsored). I'm going to submit a qmtest package (http://www.codesourcery.com/qmtest) within the coming days. Are you the one to review that, then ? Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191544.m9JFigPO027211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #38 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 11:44:38 EDT --- Hey Devrim, I think it's time to decide wether to call the package postgresql-slony1 or slony1, and to rename everything throughout the code. For instance the spec file is called postgresql-slony1.spec, I'd say rename it to slony1.spec Furthermore I've added 2 patches to the spec and the init script which clean a few things up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:46:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191546.m9JFkI88027720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #156674|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #39 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 11:46:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320805) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320805) cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:46:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191546.m9JFkqEW024072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #40 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-19 11:46:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320806) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320806) more cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:47:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191547.m9JFle1m027902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #320806|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:47:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191547.m9JFlIwj027855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #320805|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | Attachment #320805|0 |1 is patch| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 15:51:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:51:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191551.m9JFpgbE028521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #41 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2008-10-19 11:51:41 EDT --- Hi Ruben, (In reply to comment #38) > > I think it's time to decide wether to call the package postgresql-slony1 or > slony1, and to rename everything throughout the code. Let's make it slony1 -- I want to get rid of postgresql- prefix from many of my packages. > Furthermore I've added 2 patches to the spec and the init script which clean a > few things up. Thanks! I'll check them soon. Devrim -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 16:12:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191612.m9JGCZcF027614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: PyMOL - |Review Request: pymol - |python molecular graphics |python molecular graphics --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-19 12:12:34 EDT --- Okay. For consistency please use %defattr(-,root,root,-) also for subpackages (you can fix this when importing to Fedora CVS). --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pymol) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 16:12:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191612.m9JGCvaO031563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 16:16:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191616.m9JGG2UB028250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #52 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-19 12:15:59 EDT --- Okay. Then I will wait for your another review request. (By the way would you also update this package, too?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 16:33:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191633.m9JGXXdK030457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #53 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-10-19 12:33:32 EDT --- Yes, I'm going to release Synopsis 0.11 in a couple of days, and can submit a new package based on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 16:35:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467627] New: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 Summary: Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jhrozek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper-1.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: fsniper is a tool that monitors a given set of directories for new files. Then, based on the new file's type or name, it invokes a script to be run (any executable via the shell) on that file. Common uses include making a single drop directory for all things from a webbrowser etc, and having semi-intelligent scripts figure out what to do with those files. You write the scripts yourself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 17:30:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191730.m9JHUVMp009570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak 2008-10-19 13:30:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libev Short Description: High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features Owners: mnowak Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mnowak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 18:06:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191806.m9JI6FDd014621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #24 from jebba 2008-10-19 14:06:13 EDT --- I flagged this to "fedora?cvs?" a couple days ago or so. It had been flagged "fedora-cvs+", but it may have been me that flagged it that way instead of "?" accidentally. Anyway, I *think* I've done everything I need to do to get this package into Fedora and am waiting on upstream to make the CVS module (when trying to check it out, I get "Error: cvs server: cannot find module `fmit' - ignored"). In short, the ball is in some fedora-admin's court, I believe. But if there is something I missed that I need to do first, let me know. Mamoru Tasaka thanks again for all your help. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 18:52:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191852.m9JIqb6R017052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-19 14:52:35 EDT --- Some notes for 2.0.2-1: A. %description stage * License - is actually BSD (also see CHANGES.txt) Perhaps you want to change the license of .pc.in file. * (Build)Requires * For -devel subpackage - "Requires: protobuf" is redundant because protobuf-compiler already requires protobuf. * For -python subpackage - Would you explain why -python subpackage has "Requires python-setuptools"? ------------------------------------------------------ Additional remark about python subpackage: The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other packages because it is a pure python implementation. ------------------------------------------------------ - Well, for technical discussion, does this mean that there will be no problem even if the installed version of protobuf and protobuf-python differ? (if you don't write Requires this can happen). This discussion can be applied for -java subpackage. * For -java subpackage - About "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6.0" -- If this means that Java binding needs OpenJDK to build, then this line must be -------------------------------------------------------- BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 -------------------------------------------------------- java-devel vitrual Provides by java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel has Epoch 1 for historical reason (see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires ) -- If either OpenJDK or icedtea can be used to build, then "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7" is sufficient (Note that 1.7 < 1:1.6) * For -javadoc subpackage - "Requires: %{name}-%{version}-%{release}-java" is perhaps a typo. * Shipping -static subpackage - Please explain why this package is needed where -devel subpackage is provided which includes .so symlink libraries. Usually static archives must be removed unless the package does not provide shared libraries. B. %prep, %build, %instll, scriptlets stage: * Timestamps - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files - Also this package uses "install-sh" when installing files. In such case -------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" -------------------------------------------------------- is useful to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. ('INSTALL="install -p"' option is usually tricks for Makefiles based on Makefiles generated by more recent Makefiles and not using install-sh) * Internal libraries - This package uses "gtest" library to build. This is already provided as "gtest" rpm on Fedora system-widely so this package must be patched to use system-wide gtest library. * Unneeded /sbin/ldconfig call - There is no need that -devel subpackage should call /sbin/ldconfig on post/postun scriptlets. C. %files entry * Macros - Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros %_prefix/include must be %_includedir. * For -devel subpackage -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/protobuf/ protobuf-devel-2.0.2-1.fc10.i386 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/ file /usr/include/google is not owned by any package -------------------------------------------------------- - Well, it seems that some other packages also install files under %_includedir/google, however when installing this -devel subpackage (and its dependency rpms), %_includedir/google is not owned by any packages. So for now %_includedir/google must also be owned by this rpm. * For -python subpackage -------------------------------------------------------- %files python -f python/INSTALLED_FILES -------------------------------------------------------- - This method (i.e. listing %files entry by using INSTALLED_FILES created by setup.py) is forbidden on Fedora. With this method directory ownership issue is frequently ignored (and actually for this case): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories !!For -vim subpackage ! Neither of %_datadir/vim/vimfiles/{ftdetect,syntax} are owned by any packages, however I will ask vim maintainer about this. * For -java subpackage - %{_datadir}/maven2/poms, %{_mavendepmapfragdir} are already owned by jpackage-utils and this package should not own these directories (in this point packaging guidelines is a bit wrong). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 19:52:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 15:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810191952.m9JJqgJ1029240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-19 15:52:41 EDT --- - I've changed the make command to run with QUIET=no, so it does not require a patch. - the chroot contains no secret information, and is just there for security in case the unbound process would get compromised with a buffer overflow. Since there is nothing to hide, using world-readable seems appropriate. - I've created a separate libs package as you recommended - I've added the unbound group Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm initscript: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:10:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461338] Review Request: dahdi-tools - Userspace tools to configure the DAHDI kernel modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192110.m9JLAUJB004370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461338 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-19 17:10:29 EDT --- Closing as its now built and in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:24:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192124.m9JLOfgX005906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:42:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192142.m9JLgkp0008461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-19 17:42:45 EDT --- For anyone who'd wish to follow up on this, his latest SRPM appears to be: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/9/SRPMS/brlcad-7.12.4-1.fc9.kwizart.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:47:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] New: Review Request: sugar-maze - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-maze - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Summary: Review Request: sugar-maze - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: A simple maze game for the XO laptop. You can play by yourself or race to solve it with your buddies. Up to 3 people can play on a single XO laptop and lots more can play when shared over the network. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:51:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192151.m9JLpwgd009650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-19 17:51:57 EDT --- again, sorry Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple maze game for the XO laptop. You can play by yourself or race to solve it with your buddies. Up to 3 people can play on a single XO laptop and lots more can play when shared over the network. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889260 fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-maze.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-maze-6-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:55:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467642] New: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Summary: Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-read.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-read-52-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Read activity allows the laptop to act as a book reader. It has a simple interface, and will view many kinds of text and image-based book- like materials. It will have particular strengths in handheld mode, with extremely low power consumption and simple navigation controls. Read can read PDF files, single-page TIFF files, and also read DJVU files. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889282 [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-read-52-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-read.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-read-52-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-read.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 21:59:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467643] New: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Summary: Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Speak is a talking face for the XO laptop. Anything you type will be spoken aloud using the XO's speech synthesizer, espeak. You can adjust the accent, rate and pitch of the voice as well as the shape of the eyes and mouth. This is a great way to experiment with the speech synthesizer, learn to type or just have fun making a funny face for your XO. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889310 [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-speak.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-speak-9-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-speak.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:02:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467644] New: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Summary: Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The game memorize is about finding matching pairs. A pair can consist of any multimedia object. At the moment these are images, sounds and text but this could be extended to animations or movie snippets as well. Which pairs do match is up to the creator of the game. Memorize is actually more than just a predefined game you can play, it allows you to create new games yourself as well. Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=888662 [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-memorize.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-memorize-28-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-memorize.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:08:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192208.m9JM83B3011949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:13:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244485] Review Request: perl-XML-Filter-ExceptionLocator - Filter to add line/col numbers to SAX errors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192213.m9JMDKGW012911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244485 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Depends on|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467422] F10 branch for vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192214.m9JMEYhZ017936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:14:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:13:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 195678] Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192213.m9JMDWmt017845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Depends on|201449 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192216.m9JMGO25013564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:16:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:18:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192218.m9JMIFIK018639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:18:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467645] New: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Summary: Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-distance.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Distance (aka Acoustic Tape Measure) determines the physical distance between two XOs by measuring how long it takes sound pulses to travel between them. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889518 [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-distance.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-distance-13-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-distance.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Note: No language support at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:24:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192224.m9JMOdvQ014353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:24:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:22:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192222.m9JMMvmQ014256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:22:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192231.m9JMVu5t020351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #12 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-19 18:31:55 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/mpfi.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/mpfi-1.3.4-0.4.RC3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:43:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192243.m9JMhHMB016917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:43:16 EDT --- yes, if it's tagged + no cvs admin will see it. ;) Sorry for the delay... cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:41:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192241.m9JMfc2i016795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:41:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:45:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192245.m9JMjTAu022203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:45:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:49:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192249.m9JMnb6W017791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:49:36 EDT --- Shouldn't this not include the name "Tetris" in the description? See bug 238526 for some discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192247.m9JMlvYF022635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:47:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:54:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192254.m9JMstuH018605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:54:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454220] Review Request: germanium - a download manager for eMusic.com In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192251.m9JMpinI018369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454220 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(bloch at verdurin.co | |m) | --- Comment #45 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-19 18:51:40 EDT --- Matt, thanks for responding. Just haven't had the time to fix this properly yet. I'll upload a new package and send the patch to you when it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:56:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:56:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192256.m9JMucBF024071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:56:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204112] Review Request: ochusha - A GTK+ 2ch.net BBS Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192259.m9JMxt8K019519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204112 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:59:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 22:58:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:58:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192258.m9JMw5km024252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 18:58:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:01:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254016] Review Request: rubygem-gem_plugin - plugin system based on rubygems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192301.m9JN1NHG024923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254016 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 19:01:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:02:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254018] Review Request: rubygem-fastthread - optimized thread.rb replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192302.m9JN2QbA020181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254018 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 19:02:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192304.m9JN4O10025197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 19:04:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:03:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254019] Review Request: rubygem-daemons - A toolkit to create and control ruby daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192303.m9JN3SkR025094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254019 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-19 19:03:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:41:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192341.m9JNfmc5025414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 Brendt Wohlberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:41:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192341.m9JNfLlS025369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 --- Comment #16 from Brendt Wohlberg 2008-10-19 19:41:17 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xgrep New Branches: EL-5 Owners: brendt I received a request from a user to maintain an addition branch for EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 19 23:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810192341.m9JNfGFp025340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-19 19:41:15 EDT --- Built for Rawhide, F-9, and F-8: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889572 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889582 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 01:34:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200134.m9K1YWSB007960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #35 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-19 21:34:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pymol Short Description: python molecular graphics Owners: timfenn Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 01:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200134.m9K1YrSG012143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 01:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 21:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466692] Review Request: iml - Finds solutions to systems of linear equations over integers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200159.m9K1xSvT015957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466692 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-19 21:59:27 EDT --- Built in rawhide [0], closing. [0]: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889730 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 02:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] New: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Summary: Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0. 1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roma at lcg.ufrj.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Yaf(a)Ray 0.1.0 is a new raytracing render engine written from scratch, and it replaces YafRay 0.0.9. After two years of development, it already features a complete set of lighting and rendering options. http://wiki.yafray.org/bin/view.pl/UserDoc/YafaRay Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 04:18:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200418.m9K4IqUT004117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #40 from ritz 2008-10-20 00:18:51 EDT --- sorry, i was unable to access the page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 05:57:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 01:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200557.m9K5vbq7013613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-20 01:57:36 EDT --- I think that "Tetris" in that form can be included in description. Problems in other games were in that they were clones and had derived names. This game in not a clone definitely. This case is like "Windows" used in wine description. But, may be, better to remove it to match other games and take away all questions regarding legal status. So, Xavier, please remove it from description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 06:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200632.m9K6WHmK018687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #36 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-20 02:32:16 EDT --- Please add also F-9 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 07:09:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437192] Review Request: simdock - Fast and customizable dockbar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200709.m9K79hd7023892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437192 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 03:09:41 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 07:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200714.m9K7Elvg029755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 03:14:46 EDT --- New files from lspooky: spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.3/bkchem.spec srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.3/bkchem-0.12.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 07:26:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200726.m9K7QFUl026658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 03:26:13 EDT --- Still tarball issue here: md5sum bkchem-0.12.3-nopiddle.tar.gz* cf44527c4e2ea770dec10dd8330e4182 bkchem-0.12.3-nopiddle.tar.gz 5937df0331fd7fcbfd5ef40b5923d59e bkchem-0.12.3-nopiddle.tar.gz.rpm lspooky, have you modified the tarball? Please fix this before we continue, then post links to spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 07:36:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200736.m9K7a9vD028075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot 2008-10-20 03:36:08 EDT --- What about something like that (s/Tetris/classic falling block games/) : " OpenAlchemist is a new reflexion game which looks like classic falling block games but where you can take your time. Be a crazy alchemist and try to make new objects from those you get from the sky. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 07:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200745.m9K7jj73001930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at schampijer.de --- Comment #1 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-20 03:45:44 EDT --- To play sounds memorize is dependent on csound. The fedora csound package does not contain the opcode to play ogg vorbis AFAIK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=33799. OLPC is using a specialized csound package http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6247 which contains this opcode. Not sure yet how best to go forward, have to examine in more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 08:13:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200813.m9K8DV8A002621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 08:12:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200812.m9K8Cqu8007350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 04:12:50 EDT --- Review Guidelines MUST items: - [OK] rpmlint output: - [OK] package name - [OK] %{name}.spec - [OK] Packaging Guidelines - [-] Licensing Guidelines GPLv2+ is correct, however some files: src-common/test* are under Academic Free License version 2.0 Comment? Contact upstream. - [OK] License Field in spec - [-] License text in %doc Seems like LICENSE.txt is missing the "and later" which is present in files. - [OK] Spec file in en_US - [OK] legible spec file - [OK] source matches upstream md5sum ContextFreeSource2.1.tgz* 477242e74c4f953ceca7bf06e944a46e ContextFreeSource2.1.tgz 477242e74c4f953ceca7bf06e944a46e ContextFreeSource2.1.tgz.rpm - [OK] compiles successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889881 - N/A %find_lang - N/A shared libs - N/A not relocatable - [OK] directory ownership - [OK] no duplicate files in %files - [OK] proper permissions on files, %defattr present - [OK] %clean section cleans %{buildroot} - [OK] consistently uses macros - [OK] package contains code - N/A large docs - [OK] %doc files do not affect runtime behaviour - N/A header files in -devel - N/A static libs in -static - N/A foo.pc files - N/A libfoo.so.1.1 - N/A no devel package - N/A no .la archives - N/A desktop file - [OK] Does not own files/dirs owned by other packages - [OK] %install cleans out %{buildroot} first - [OK] all filenames are valid ASCII and thus UTF-8 - N/A Scriptlets Summary: everything seems fine except some licenses issues: - a lot of files are missing license headers - there are at least two licenses here GPLv2+ and Academic Free License version 2.0 - LICENSE.txt seems to be GPLv2. I would recommend to contact upstream about these issues. Pedantic: - remove extra space in version and release tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 08:45:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200845.m9K8jqKK013249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #37 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-20 04:45:51 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 08:46:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200846.m9K8k88a008406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 09:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200922.m9K9Mxfb020223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 05:22:58 EDT --- @Ruben You have assigned yourself to the bug. What's hold the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 09:41:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 05:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810200941.m9K9faXd018414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #16 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-20 05:41:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > And no, the bottom of my comment 13 referred to elisa-plugins-good > actually, not the main elisa package. Do you mean importing the plugins spec files into the "elisa" CVS directory? That seems like abusing the CVS structure to me, so maybe I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 10:22:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201022.m9KAMgeK025831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-20 06:22:41 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 10:27:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201027.m9KARc0D026616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 06:27:37 EDT --- @Nathaniel Thx for your advices. The problem to have libproxy packaged as one whole is that dependencies from each modules will need to be satisfied. And the dependencies will be huge if we need to satisfy libproxy-gnome on a KDE system, for example (or even on a X-less system). So libproxy is using dlopen for the modules, which is usually a good thing. But it shoudn't prevent the code from beeing reviewed by the related project. (either NetworkManager, gnome, kde, mozilla, etc). That way, only the libproxy dependency will be added if the package was compiled with libproxy support. That's what I don't understand whith the current libproxy scheme: In the vlc case, the code to support libproxy has been added (it mean, reviewed by the VideoLan team) to the vlc source code. So I cannot understand why it is not the same with NetworkManager Gnome mozilla and etc ? The problem I could expect is that it will change the behaviour to the related application. So for now I would only import the libproxy package. Without anything else (no plugins) And warn the different applications to add support for libproxy by themselves. For the libproxy-bin. The split is needed for multilibs compliance If any application needs this binary, it will need to requires it. @Nathaniel Doies it sound good for now ? Do you have other advices ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 10:40:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 06:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201040.m9KAeAN6001864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #10 from Joe Orton 2008-10-20 06:40:09 EDT --- Splitting the backend plugin DSOs into separate binary packages seems like the right thing to do: - each KDE/GNOME/etc DSO must have shared library dependencies on the respective environment libraries - those library dependencies must be reflected (automatically) in RPM package dependencies - putting the plugins in the main package would therefore pull in all the necessary dependencies in KDE/GNOME/etc It might be a good idea to get the -plugins- packages pulled in via some other deps, or simply by updating comps to ensure they get installed by default. I've updated neon upstream to add support for libproxy, BTW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 11:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201142.m9KBg0Jd007329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #14 from Daniel Novotny 2008-10-20 07:41:59 EDT --- okay, I pushed the new amanda 2.6.0p2 into rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 11:58:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443578] Review Request: monodevelop-database - database plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201158.m9KBwSvI010312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443578 --- Comment #3 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-20 07:58:27 EDT --- Unable to build due to problems with MD 1.9. This should be resolved in the next couple of weeks with MD 1.9 alpha 2's release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 11:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443577] Review Request: monodevelop-java - java plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201158.m9KBw6eF010248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443577 --- Comment #9 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-20 07:58:04 EDT --- Unable to build due to problems with MD 1.9. This should be resolved in the next couple of weeks with MD 1.9 alpha 2's release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 11:56:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201156.m9KBuxwn010100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 07:56:59 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 11:57:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 07:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443576] Review Request: monodevelop-boo - boo plugin for monodevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201157.m9KBvZ6H015683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443576 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(paul at all-the-john | |sons.co.uk) | --- Comment #6 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-20 07:57:34 EDT --- Unable to build due to problems with MD 1.9. This should be resolved in the next couple of weeks with MD 1.9 alpha 2's release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:01:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201201.m9KC1T0g011372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-20 08:01:27 EDT --- This is the review of _elisa-plugins-good_ and I suggested: > Packaging-wise this is fine. Could be imported and developed > further in cvs until the deps are ready, too. That translates to "I think this could be approved, so further development [until the deps are ready] can be done in cvs". Note that the review ticket is not assigned to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201210.m9KCAKpv018686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #3 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-20 08:10:18 EDT --- I fixed the most obvious problems in the .spec file and created -gui subpackage with the openipmigui tool. Regarding the problems reported in comment #1: 1) tcl-devel would create binding to TCL language. I think there is no interest in OpenIPMI-tcl subpackage. I explicitly added '--with-tcl=no' option to %configure. 2) yes, there is private libedit library. It's patched version of the upstream one. I admit I don't know why it's there and why it's patched. 3) OpenIPMI-gui subpackage added 4) ipmitool now has separate package Regarding the Mandriva's OpenIPMI-ui subpackage, IMHO it's roughly equivalent to our OpenIPMI.rpm, while Mandriva's OpenIPMI.rpm ships only libraries (=~ our OpenIPMI-libs.rpm). Please resume the review with OpenIPMI-2.0.14-4.fc10, available in tomorrow's rawhide or at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/OpenIPMI/2.0.14/4.fc10/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201216.m9KCGQWF014745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-20 08:16:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > This is the review of _elisa-plugins-good_ and I suggested: Package reviews must follow the guidelines outlined here https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > > Packaging-wise this is fine. Could be imported and developed > > further in cvs until the deps are ready, too. > > That translates to "I think this could be approved, so further > development [until the deps are ready] can be done in cvs". How can it be imported and developed in the RPM cvs if it won't build against rawhide due to the lack of deps which is one of the requirements of the package review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] New: Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Summary: Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: A blog client, which works for Wordpress and livejournal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:23:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201223.m9KCNVg7016198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:23:31 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=890402 lekhonee.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Chotha/__init__.py 0644 lekhonee.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chotha.data lekhonee.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2-1 0.2-2.fc10 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:27:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201227.m9KCRRMU017173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:27:26 EDT --- review-o-matic I hate you :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:29:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201229.m9KCTFKw017373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #22 from David Timms 2008-10-20 08:29:13 EDT --- imported, committed and built on devel, F9, F8, EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201231.m9KCVGfn018084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 08:31:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Thank you Randall, thank you Jon > > License Tag: > GPLv2+ > > Desktop file: > Sorry, but I don't know what you mean. You have --vendor="fedora". Should be --vendor=''. That's all. > > ---- > Update to 0.85 > > SPEC: > http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead.spec > > SRPM: > http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead-0.85-1.fc10.src.rpm > ---- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:33:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201233.m9KCX4Hl023582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:33:04 EDT --- New package at: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201240.m9KCe0le019395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:39:59 EDT --- The above is a bug in the RoM it self, upstream please fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:38:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:38:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201238.m9KCcOrq019248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:38:23 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=890432 lekhonee.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Chotha/__init__.py 0644 lekhonee.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/chotha.data lekhonee.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.2-1 0.2-2.fc10 6 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201244.m9KCiRFd020326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #6 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 08:44:26 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=890442 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:50:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:50:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201250.m9KCoWmw027103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 08:50:31 EDT --- Koji build pruned, repost? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:51:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201251.m9KCpMSX027326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Eduardo Habkost changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Eduardo Habkost 2008-10-20 08:51:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: etherboot Short Description: Etherboot collection of boot roms Owners: ehabkost, glommer Branches: devel Is it too late for F-10? I don't know if I should request a F-10 branch also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:51:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201251.m9KCp2Hh021875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 08:51:01 EDT --- Koji build pruned, repost? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 12:53:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201253.m9KCr9Aa027543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Katz 2008-10-20 08:53:09 EDT --- Does this activity work? I was under the impression that evince changes are required for sugar-read -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:03:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201303.m9KD3oHW024208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 09:03:49 EDT --- Actually, it was my understanding that not all files must have license headers, nor must LICENSE.txt include 'and later. I'll check on the Academic Free License bits. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:08:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201308.m9KD8Oq7025142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 09:08:23 EDT --- Did with new home: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:06:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201306.m9KD6YsV024949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #11 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-10-20 09:06:33 EDT --- Basically, the idea is this: 1. set the build deps so that all plugins are built 2. tell rpmbuild to ignore the dependencies in the plugins 3. include the plugins in the main package (but don't add their deps to the rpm) Again, this is not the standard method, I know. I'm trying to avoid the following scenario: 1. John installs an app which depends on libproxy 2. Afterwards, John installs firefox. 3. If the mozjs plugin is included in the base libproxy package, WPAD/PAC will *just work*. However, if mozjs is not in the base libproxy package, John will *also* have to install libproxy-plugin-mozjs to get WPAD/PAC support. libproxy should always just work, no matter what is installed on the system. Again, as a packager, I know this flies in the face of conventional packaging wisdom. However, the user has a lot to gain by doing it this way. If rpmbuild cannot be told to ignore DSO shlib deps, then I don't see any other solution than one-package-per-plugin. Great to hear about neon! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:14:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201314.m9KDEnVM026306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #8 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 09:14:48 EDT --- With changes: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:17:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201317.m9KDHXH3032590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #13 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-10-20 09:17:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm trying to work through some of these old tickets; are you still interested > in getting this package into Fedora? Yes as its used by other software that we are packaging. > Some observations: > > Builds fine; rpmlint for me has only an erroneous complaint about permissions > on the .so file. Not sure if that need fixing? > The page I get from visiting the URL doesn't seem to have anything at all to do > with this software. Is there an actual upstream URL? No their isn't the software seems to have disappeared but is hosted in various places around the net. > Where goes genextdoc.py come from? You should provide its full location in > Source1: if possible. I'm not really sure, it simply wasn't part of the tarball that I discovered and I found it through Google codesearch and pushed it into the package. > Otherwise everything looks OK to me; just let me know if you'd like for me to > do a full review. If you are willing to do a full review that would be great. If I know its going to move forward then I can spend more time correcting issues that you pick up. So that's a YES! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201336.m9KDa5aD003917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #9 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 09:36:04 EDT --- Fixed desktop file issue: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:39:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201339.m9KDdYXQ004421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 --- Comment #35 from rob 2008-10-20 09:39:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > instead of the explicit plugin since that way you own the directories too. good idea. > Also, note that it's not strictly required to do gcj stuff if you don't want to > (I actually disabled it in my test build since I don't have gcj installed). good to know, i'll likely remove it then. > Oh, and I guess you should make the requirement on eclipse-platform be >= 3.4.0 > since dropins is new in 3.4 and wasn't in 3.3. thanks for the tip! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:44:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201344.m9KDiCVg005623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #10 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 09:44:11 EDT --- New source released: Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/lekhonee-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:51:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:51:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201351.m9KDp79p007170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-20 09:51:06 EDT --- Package Rename CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-pam Short Description: PAM bindings for ruby Owners: bkearney Branches: F-9 F10 InitialCC: None Sorry...goofed the package name. Should have been rubygem-pam -- bk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:53:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:53:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201353.m9KDrhWg002036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-20 09:53:42 EDT --- Assigning myself as reviewer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201355.m9KDt1E8002238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-20 09:54:59 EDT --- As all the comments on offlist discussions are resolved over multiple iterations, rpmlint etc is clean, I approve this package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 13:52:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201352.m9KDqtna007501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #12 from Joe Orton 2008-10-20 09:52:54 EDT --- It is possible to ignore the automatic shared library deps, but it's Really Really Bad (TM), because you lose the ability to enforce ABI compatibility. As I mentioned - I think the right thing to do for the example you give would be to have firefox Require the mozjs plugins subpackage, if it's the case that the latter depends on the former. Everything still works automagically that way. (It may be necessary to achieve a critical mass of libproxy-enabled apps before there is enough motivation to add these backwards -plugins dependencies) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:06:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201406.m9KE6cjr005699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #13 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-10-20 10:06:37 EDT --- There is no ABI compatibility for plugins. They are considered "internal" to libproxy. Further, the plugins change with every point release (see the plugins directory). In short, the "plugins" are not really plugins, but "other files" related to libproxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:10:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467718] New: Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-gruff.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-gruff-0.3.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets. Can be used on websites or in documents -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:15:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201415.m9KEF5qQ012421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #4 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-20 10:15:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers-2.7-1.fc10.src.rpm * it builds in koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=890610&name=build.log * rpmlint pass clean. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:15:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201415.m9KEFI1M012473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 10:15:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Basically, the idea is this: > 1. set the build deps so that all plugins are built > 2. tell rpmbuild to ignore the dependencies in the plugins Here we stop! That's perfectly possible to have rpm to ignore Dynamic Shared Object Dependencies, the question isn't here. Here is the case corner: libproxy is built with all the current dependencies for plugins (let's mention NetworkManager or mozjs and etc). Later NetworkManager or mozjs are updated but with an incompatible ABI. In This case, the interface with libproxy will collapse, unless libproxy is rebuild (for all the dependencies.) On the contrary, when vlc will be updated from 0.9.x to 1.0.x, the ABI with libproxy will be preserved. (and then vlc can even be downgraded from 1.0.x to 0.9.x on specifics needs for end-users ; without even thinking of untracked dependencies). So the perfect answear we can do from the point 2. is: "Don't even think about it!" Now there are two ways I can see for having libproxy packaged. - Split the package with all plugins. (specifically thoses that have special dependencies ). Thus it will lead to use comps.xml so the -gnome package will be installed by default once the "Gnome Desktop Env." group is selected. - Move the code from libproxy-%{project}, to the %{project} itself. (the preferred Method, IMO). This can avoid to have unexpected behaviours unknown from the related $project developpers. Then we could even consider libproxy to be available in /lib(64) instead of /usr/lib(64). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:18:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201418.m9KEIrEl013103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #5 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-20 10:18:52 EDT --- Errata: Spec URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers.spec SRPM URL: http://openrisc.rdsor.ro/openlayers-2.7-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201426.m9KEQCHc009854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Jeff Ortel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:43:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438608] Review Request: elisa-plugins-good - Good Plugins for the Elisa Media Center In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201443.m9KEhvse013188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 --- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-20 10:43:55 EDT --- What is your problem? cvs-import.sh takes src.rpm packages. There is no requirement for imported packages to be built in koji immediately. "elisa" in rawhide cvs is up-to-date, though, but it would not make sense to publish an incomplete set of builds. It's just more convenient to work on pkgs cvs rather than downloading a full set of src.rpms from an external web site. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:45:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201445.m9KEj9ia013585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 10:45:08 EDT --- Hi Paulo That's really nice to see you participating as a Fedora contributor. You should have a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers And specially for the yarafray package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process I will give you few advices on the yafaray package soon. Jon Ciesla should sponsor you once one (or more) packages will be reviewed and accepted. So it should be fine if you can submit another package to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 14:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 10:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201450.m9KEoeei014797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #15 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-10-20 10:50:39 EDT --- Ok, I understand now. So we are on the same page, here is a list of the plugins, their dependencies and where there upstream might be... PLUGIN | DEPS | UPSTREAM envar | None | libproxy file | None | libproxy gnome | x11, xmu, gconf | gnome control-center? kde | x11, xmu | libproxy? somewhere in kde? mozjs | mozjs | Firefox? networkmanager | dbus, NetworkManager | NetworkManager webkit | WebKit | WebKit Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 15:28:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201528.m9KFSMF3022054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 11:28:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Why exactly do you need to disable sse even for x86? sse isn't present on all x86 CPU, Thus activating sse on suches CPU is totally forbidden in Fedora for a binary. It is possible to have sse2 activated for a library (see atlas for an example). > The changes you make to filter_motion_est.c are illogical, but they are > effective at suppressing the respective code (since this is not Darwin > platform). The top-level Makefile helper config.mak defines a USE_MMX unless > --disable-mmx. Does this make more sense? Yes, this is a hack. To fix this, it would be better to have a --disable-sse option. so it can be disabled unless x86_64. (as all x86_64 have the sse2 cpu capability). Of course, as the koji built showned. You cannot set -DARCH_X86 on ppc64, so the cpu detection for the mlt build system should probably redesigned. > > mlt-config should be deprecated because pkg-config files are also supplied. > However, I do have to convert mlt++ over to pkg-config. I will do that now for > the next release. Also, I will check to make sure kdenlive does not use it. > I'll consider removing mlt-config as well. I haven't tested it yet, but you should note that the last version of sox also have pkg-config support after having dropped any sox-config file in the F-9 version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 15:33:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:33:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201533.m9KFXgpv023066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(karsten at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Karsten Hopp 2008-10-20 11:33:40 EDT --- I've built a new vim version in koji with fixes for those issues. Please have a look at the packages in http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/vim/7.2.025/1.fc10/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 16:30:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201630.m9KGUwYn002034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 --- Comment #8 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-20 12:30:57 EDT --- Hi Nicolas, My build machine seems to have too little memory to build cryptopp, the build has been running for ages. Are you willing to take over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 16:50:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244192] Review Request: eclipse-anyedit - AnyEdit plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201650.m9KGo6PC005051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244192 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #36 from Andrew Overholt 2008-10-20 12:50:05 EDT --- I had a nice review all typed up but I accidentally hit Ctrl-W :( Sorry if this is ugly: - I don't think you want to include the LICENSE file - just talk to upstream about putting it directly into their JAR - the Source0 URL seems incorrect. However, if I use the URL provided at the upstream site, the md5sums match - take care of the changes in #35 - move the JAR to %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins and not %{_libdir} - please document the package.xml and assemble.xml files (how you created them, etc.) - did you talk to Andrei about the unicode issue? maybe just document where the bug lies - package builds and functions fine on x86_64 - rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-3.fc9.src.rpm eclipse-anyedit.src:121: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-3.fc9.noarch.rpm eclipse-anyedit.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ^ This is caused by the location of the JAR. Moving to %{_datadir} will fix it. $ rpm -qlp !$ rpm -qlp ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1-3.fc9.noarch.rpm /usr/lib64/eclipse/dropins/anyedit/plugins/de.loskutov.anyedit.AnyEditTools_2.1.1.200809292108.jar /usr/share/doc/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1 /usr/share/doc/eclipse-anyedit-2.1.1/LICENSE Other than the location of the JAR, things are fine here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201700.m9KH09mC007009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #9 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-20 13:00:08 EDT --- Sounds fine for me. Kevin, could you create CVS for package with updated description? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201718.m9KHIRln010108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #19 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-20 13:18:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I haven't tested it yet, but you should note that the last version of sox also > have pkg-config support after having dropped any sox-config file in the F-9 > version. mlt does support sox with pkg-config except the sox 14.1.0 .pc file is wrong: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2076270&group_id=10706&atid=310706 Also, after making some changes (svn trunk) to deal with a changed interface, mlt still crashes on latest sox due to invisible changes :( If you only have a sox 14.1.0 package, then please disable the corresponding mlt module for now: configure --disable-sox. I do plan to fix this prior to the next mlt release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201734.m9KHYXet013181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #20 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-20 13:34:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Of course, as the koji built showned. You cannot set -DARCH_X86 on ppc64, so > the cpu detection for the mlt build system should probably redesigned. The mlt xine module should disable itself for ppc64 via src/modules/xine/configure. I have added "ppc64" to its tests in svn: http://mlt.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/mlt/trunk/mlt/src/modules/xine/configure?r1=1121&r2=1185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201734.m9KHY0a5018183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #14 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:33:59 EDT --- It's not a blocker, however it would be nice of upstream fixed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467748] New: Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467748 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tmz at pobox.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL.spec SRPM URL: http://tmz.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Net-SMTP-SSL-1.01-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Implements the same API as Net::SMTP, but uses IO::Socket::SSL for its network operations. Due to the nature of Net::SMTP's new method, it is not overridden to make use of a default port for the SMTPS service. Perhaps future versions will be smart like that. Port 465 is usually what you want, and it's not a pain to specify that. [This package will allow git send-email to work over SSL, fixing bug #443615] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:41:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:41:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201741.m9KHfSmG019994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:41:27 EDT --- srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/logstalgia/logstalgia-0.9.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:40:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201740.m9KHeBH6019747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 13:40:10 EDT --- I'm actually in conversation with them how. They'll be re-licensing those bits GPLv2+ as well, I'm waiting to hear when the release with this well be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201739.m9KHdUSJ019327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:39:29 EDT --- srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/e16/e16-keyedit-0.5-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201739.m9KHdN3o019269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:44:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201744.m9KHiFXt015269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #28 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:44:12 EDT --- srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/smokeping/smokeping-2.4.2-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:45:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:45:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201745.m9KHjoi6015933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 13:45:49 EDT --- Leave the name as is. Looks great. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201749.m9KHn8eb021518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 13:49:07 EDT --- Ok, all clear. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201749.m9KHn85n021528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-20 13:49:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320897) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320897) LICENSE-A - *.c/*.hpp/*.h files -- Excluding files matching $ find . -path '*/tests/*' Total 8409 files Overall DOC ASNMP/asnmp/address.cpp MIT TAO/CIAO/tools/IDL3_to_IDL2/be_extern.h LICENSE-A TAO/TAO_IDL/be_include/be_extern.h (LICENSE-A) TAO/TAO_IDL/contrib/mcpp/directive.cpp MIT TAO/TAO_IDL/driver/drv_args.cpp (LICENSE-A) TAO/TAO_IDL/fe/y.tab.h GPLv2+ (Bison output) TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/AV/RTCP.cpp BSD with advertising ace/Svc_Conf_y.cpp GPLv2+ (Bison output) apps/gperf/src/Gen_Perf.h GPLv2+ contrib/minizip/zip.h zlib contrib/utility/Example/ExH/BadCast/bad_cast.cpp zlib Note: In this table not all files are listed which have licenses other than DOC license. The files listed in the left column are the examples of files having the licenses listed on the right column. There may be some other files "near" the files listed on the left which have the same licenses. ============================================================= ============================================================= @ spot: Would you review the license attached? I am especially concerned about the part "You may copy and extend functionality (but may not remove functionality)". By the way for now I only checked files named "*.{h,cpp,hpp}" with excluding files under */tests/ directories, however there are already more than 8000 files. Actually there are more than 50000 files in this tarball. Do we have to check all of these files? @ Ken: This package contains some codes which are licensed under GPLv2+ and some codes under "BSD with advertising". Would you verify if these codes are seperated (i.e. not linked or included) altogether? Otherwise these licenses are in conflict, which renders this package to be non-approvable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201750.m9KHohwM022128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-20 13:50:42 EDT --- The package will need a bit more work before I can approve it. OK: source files match upstream: aefe6c6ddb46fb5eb5927974f0080518f63cf61a OK: dist tag is present. OK: build root is correct. OK: license field matches the actual license. OK: license is open source-compatible. GPLv2+ OK: license text included in package. OK: latest version is being packaged. OK: BuildRequires are proper. OK: compiler flags are appropriate. OK: %clean is present. OK: package builds in mock. OK: debuginfo package looks complete. OK: no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK: doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK: no duplicates in %files. OK: file permissions are appropriate. OK: code, not content. OK: documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK: %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK: no headers. OK: no pkgconfig files. OK: no libtool .la droppings. OK: desktop files valid and installed properly not necessary. PASS: package meets naming and versioning guidelines. Did you consider naming ncidd differently? Maybe ncid-server to fit in with the ncid-client? NOK: specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. The .spec/srpm file is a bit messy: * Please do use full URLs for Source0. Instead of "Source0: %{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz" please use "Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-% {version}-src.tar.gz" * Please name your patches accordingly: ncid-0.71-no-default-runlevels.patch would be a good convention to follow. * Please start your patches with the id 0. * Trim the descriptions. They are way too long. More then 10 lines should never be necessary. * I'd prefer you to move all the %post scripts to the bottom of the .spec between %clean and %file. It's again a convention most packagers seem to follow and it makes reading .spec files so much easier. * Swap the /usr hardcode in the %build and %install part for %{_prefix} NOK: rpmlint is silent. ncid-client.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ncid-client-0.71/ncid-mythtv ncidd.i386: E: non-ghost-file /var/log/cidcall.log ncidd.i386: E: zero-length /var/log/cidcall.log ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidd $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidd $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidd $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidsip $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidsip $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/ncidsip $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sip2ncid $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sip2ncid $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sip2ncid $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/yac2ncid $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/yac2ncid $prog ncidd.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/yac2ncid $prog ncid-page.i386: W: no-documentation ncid-popup.i386: W: no-documentation ncid-samba.i386: W: no-documentation ncid-speak.i386: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 17 warnings. Please remove the executable bit from the mythtv initscript. You might wanna drop it completely though. Please consider dropping the cidcall.log file and %ghost it instead if it will be created by the daemon if non-existant. The incoherent-subsys warnings should be ignoreable, possible the same for the plugin subpackages. NOK: package installs properly. The ncid-page tool will not install, the Require for mail is invalid. [root at workstation ncid]# repoquery --whatprovides mail [root at workstation ncid]# Either use mailx or /bin/mail as a dep. PASS: scriptlets present and work okay. It would be great though if you could rework the initscripts to support the newer upstart syntax. NOK: final provides and requires are sane: Requires: /bin/bash /bin/sh config(ncid-client) = 0.71-1.fc9 config(ncidd) = 0.71-1.fc9 festival kdebase kdelibs kdemultimedia libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpcap.so.0.9 mail ncid-client = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-speak = 0.71-1.fc9 perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(IO::Socket::INET) perl(Net::Pcap) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) smbclient /usr/bin/perl Provides: config(ncid-client) = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-client = 0.71-1.fc9 config(ncidd) = 0.71-1.fc9 ncidd = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-debuginfo = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-page = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-popup = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-samba = 0.71-1.fc9 ncid-speak = 0.71-1.fc9 Problem is the mail dependency again. NOK: owns the directories it creates. /etc/ncid /usr/share/ncid are shared by the packages but no package owns these directories. Another observation: Why did you remove the shebang line from the ncidrotate-script? If it's supposed to be executable, drop it in /usr/libexec/%{name}/. A general suggestions: I found upstream .spec files often too much work to adapt to the fedora packaging guidelines which is why I'm rolling my own usually. Might be wort considering the next time. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:55:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201755.m9KHt1Xa017361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201752.m9KHqsT3017092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201755.m9KHtFX5017764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(esandeen at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201751.m9KHpQvs016914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #16 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:51:25 EDT --- These licenses issues tend to show up in Fedora reviews, it takes time and a bit of pain, however in the long run we are making the world a better place. Thanks for your contribution! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:55:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201755.m9KHtSvv017824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:55:27 EDT --- Thanks again! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: logstalgia Short Description: Web server access log visualizer Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:53:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201753.m9KHrW4j017192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 13:53:31 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: e16-keyedit Short Description: GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461385] Review Request: hydra - A very fast network logon cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201756.m9KHuSSn023389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |andreas at bawue.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |andreas at bawue.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:59:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201759.m9KHxJ8o023811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-20 13:59:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > These licenses issues tend to show up in Fedora reviews, it takes time and a > bit of pain, however in the long run we are making the world a better place. > +1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 17:58:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201758.m9KHwN0d023686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-20 13:58:22 EDT --- LICENSE-A (aka Sun Interface Definition Language CFE License) is definitely non-free. Ken, sorry for not catching this the first time, hopefully upstream will be able to get those files relicensed (or replace them). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201804.m9KI4Olh019785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 14:04:22 EDT --- I would prefer davej to post links to spec and srpm, however it's not strictly needed: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:07:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442233] Review Request: oprofileui - user interface for analysing oprofile data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201807.m9KI7wJC020702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442233 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:14:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461385] Review Request: hydra - A very fast network logon cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201814.m9KIE81t026475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 Flag| |needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) --- Comment #1 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-20 14:14:06 EDT --- That one was a pretty quick review as it didn't compile in mock. Please check OK - source files match upstream: cd2e7e5ea479d50982b08334b1f4477a6620e6b45bc79ab55ddd07b128c64611 hydra-5.4-src.tar.gz OK - package meets naming and versioning guidelines. ??? - specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. Shouldn't the sed cack for the Makefile go into the prep phase? OK - dist tag is present. OK - build root is correct. NOK - license field matches the actual license. NOK - license is open source-compatible. While the code is GPLv2, there's a LICENCE.HYDRA file adding additional stipulations. Please check this, blocking FE-LEGAL until cleared up. OK - license text included in package. OK - latest version is being packaged. NOK - BuildRequires are proper. Missing buildrequires. OK - compiler flags are appropriate. OK - %clean is present. NOK - package builds in mock. At least one missing dependency on openssl-devel, possibly other. Please check. NOTCHECKED: package installs properly. debuginfo package looks complete. rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane: (paste in the rpm -qp --provides and --requires output) %check is present and all tests pass: (if possible, include some info indicating a successful test suite) (it's OK if there's no test suite, but if one is there it should be run if possible) no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. (or, if shared libraries are present, make sure ldconfig is run) owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. no scriptlets present. (or, if scriptlets are present, compare them against the ScriptletSnippets page) code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. desktop files valid and installed properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:42:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201842.m9KIgFVH026892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(esandeen at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201841.m9KIfU5Q026709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(esandeen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Eric Sandeen 2008-10-20 14:41:28 EDT --- Thanks for the thorough review; I'll look over the questions & suggestions in a bit. At this point I don't actually remember if I wrote the specfile from scratch or used the upstream one :) -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:46:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201846.m9KIk7g4032690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-20 14:46:06 EDT --- Thanks Karsten, You've commented out the line below, probably accidental? %clean #rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Furthermore all issues have been resolved, package is APPROVED. Thanks for your help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:54:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201854.m9KIsnrt029859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Kushal Das 2008-10-20 14:54:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lekhonee Short Description: A blog client Owners: kushal Branches: F-9 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 18:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201858.m9KIw1AA002985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 14:58:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > mlt does support sox with pkg-config except the sox 14.1.0 .pc file is wrong: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2076270&group_id=10706&atid=310706 Why ? Even if sox.h ends in $(PREFIX)/include , /usr/include will be in the default path, so the header will be found anyway... It would be better to have sox.h not in the default path and use -I/usr/include/sox each time sox libraries are meant to be linked. for xine: Indeed, so it is disabled unless %{ix86} and x86_64 SPECS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mlt.spec SRPMS: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mlt-0.3.0-5.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Summary: Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders There is still some work, specially for (at least): - The multilibs compliance (to split the binaries and the libraries). - The modules packaged as sub-packages (so the dependencies will be installed as needed - see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035#c7 for a discution on rpm packaging and modules). - Have runtime tests to be done. If the frei0r-devel package isn't ready, it could be possible to enable it later... I can offer my help as co-maintainer of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459855] Review Request: ncid - Caller ID distributed over a network to a variety of devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201905.m9KJ595O004826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459855 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-20 15:05:08 EDT --- Thanks. Just upload a new srpm and I'll take a look and approve if possible. It looks a lot like the spec in the Fedora subdir of the upstream tarball. So I just assumed. regards, andreas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201902.m9KJ2cJe004341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #12 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-10-20 15:02:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (The submitter replied to me that currently he has trouble in accessing to > internet > and will provide a new srpm within 4-5 days) The New SRPM and SPEC file :- Spec URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup.spec SRPM URL: http://soumya.fedorapeople.org/python-wikimarkup-1.01-5svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:23:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:23:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467764] New: Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467764 Summary: Review Request: python-twitter - A python wrapper around the Twitter API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-twitter.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-twitter-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This library provides a pure python interface for the Twitter API. Twitter (http://twitter.com) provides a service that allows people to connect via the web, IM, and SMS. Twitter exposes a web services API (http://twitter.com/help/api) and this library is intended to make it even easier for python programmers to use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:43:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201943.m9KJh9QM011807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #29 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-20 15:43:07 EDT --- I am sorry for the delay, Terje. I'll finish the review ASAP. Please bear with me, I have $WORK stuff to finish first -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 19:53:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810201953.m9KJrVLK013812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pertusus at free.fr Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-20 15:53:29 EDT --- * rpmlint is silent * free software, upstream includes wrong license, so license file not shipped * match upstream 02f3fb7a09ef683f035dd20dca653507 mpfi-1.3.4-RC3.tar.gz * follow packaging guidelines * static library rightly packaged * %files section right please keep the timestamp of archives (with spectool -g or wget -N for example): -rw-rw-r-- 1 dumas dumas 150760 oct. 20 21:48 mpfi-1.3.4-RC3.tar.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 dumas dumas 150760 oct. 12 21:11 ../SOURCES/mpfi-1.3.4-RC3.tar.gz If source timestamp is kept APPROVED You should contact upstream about the license file mismatch. Also wait something like a day to let Ralf comment if he wants to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:05:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202005.m9KK5bQi011278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:05:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202005.m9KK5L3i011192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:05:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202005.m9KK5gQB016130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:05:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202005.m9KK5SbE016064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:07:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202007.m9KK7sAO011685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #41 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-20 16:07:53 EDT --- I can access that page... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:05:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202005.m9KK5qt7011359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202019.m9KKJ9qD013439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #30 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 16:19:07 EDT --- No problemo, I can wait. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:17:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202017.m9KKHICg013325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-20 16:17:17 EDT --- ahm, okay :-/ sorry SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.85/homestead-0.85-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202017.m9KKHoJ6018182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #15 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-20 16:17:48 EDT --- please also add F-9 branch (as a requirement to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:18:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202018.m9KKI2fg018218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQICu019938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:26:17 EDT --- publican-ovirt-0.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:27:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202027.m9KKRWqp015452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:27:31 EDT --- insight-6.8-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202028.m9KKSH2k020526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:28:15 EDT --- gromacs-4.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202027.m9KKR3DK020222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:27:02 EDT --- freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202027.m9KKReIp020348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:27:38 EDT --- freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:27:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202027.m9KKRjWI020388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:27:44 EDT --- freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQaT4015212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:26:34 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461007] Review Request: libftdi - Library to program and control the FTDI USB controller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQQlJ015158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461007 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:26:25 EDT --- libftdi-0.14-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQds5015258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462309] Review Request: publican-ovirt - Common documentation files for oVirt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQK6C015114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462309 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:26:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445126] Review Request: mirrormanager - Fedora MirrorManager server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202026.m9KKQEQc015057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445126 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 16:26:12 EDT --- mirrormanager-1.2.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mirrormanager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8911 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:36:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202036.m9KKaYRH023085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-20 16:36:32 EDT --- wget -N says 'Last-modified header missing -- time-stamps turned off.' I will contact upstream about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:37:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:37:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202037.m9KKbhxV023286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-20 16:37:42 EDT --- Well, no one seems to react so let's not stall this anymore. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202045.m9KKjlIL019385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #22 from jebba 2008-10-20 16:45:46 EDT --- kwizart, OK, re: co-maintainer :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202043.m9KKhtaL024154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #42 from ritz 2008-10-20 16:43:53 EDT --- my bad, i had not installed the cert. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202047.m9KKlGNM024808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 --- Comment #15 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-20 16:47:15 EDT --- Indeed, I didn't noticed, but my download was indeed newer than yours!! So definitely APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 20:57:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202057.m9KKvvlG021082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 16:57:56 EDT --- Thanks! I have sent a mail to spot, he is going to suggest the change for the committee. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:00:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463017] Review Request: getdata - Library for reading and writing dirfile data. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202100.m9KL01HS026563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463017 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Matthew Truch 2008-10-20 17:00:00 EDT --- Built in rawhide; builds for F9 and F8 coming soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:01:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202101.m9KL1MT9027207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-20 17:01:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: beediff Short Description: Visual tool for comparing and merging files Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467791] New: Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791 Summary: Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: somlo at cmu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/vtun.spec SRPM URL: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~somlo/vtun-3.0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: VTun provides a method for creating Virtual Tunnels over TCP/IP networks and allows one to shape, compress, and encrypt traffic in those tunnels. Supported types of tunnels are: PPP, IP, Ethernet and most other serial protocols and programs. VTun is easily and highly configurable: it can be used for various network tasks like VPN, Mobile IP, Shaped Internet access, IP address saving, etc. It is completely a user space implementation and does not require modification to any kernel parts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202143.m9KLhuSp029544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #19 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-20 17:43:54 EDT --- Eh, Michael Schwendt, make decision do not provide info from upstream? :( Mamoru Tasaka, it seems all fixed in new 2.0 version. In build log I see only one warning (except of several about unesed return values) on first glance: In function 'strncat', inlined from 'main' at text.c:259: /usr/include/bits/string3.h:153: warning: call to __builtin___strncat_chk might overflow destination buffer But it is not axel trouble I thought. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=891915 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:46:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202146.m9KLkWeS002957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 17:46:31 EDT --- rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455953] Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack for guitar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202146.m9KLkSw7030149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455953 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 17:46:27 EDT --- rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202159.m9KLxWW6032139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-20 17:59:30 EDT --- Haven't got any reply from upstream. My message went to "Wilmer van der Gaast " on Sep 1st and also linked this ticket. And it is the same bug as commented on before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:56:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202156.m9KLupJW031894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #35 from Anders Kaseorg 2008-10-20 17:56:50 EDT --- Ksplice 0.9.2 was released on 2008-10-17. This is the first version to support Fedora kernels >= 2.6.26 (because of CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA), so it would be good to get the package updated again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202156.m9KLuIe6031845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #64 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-20 17:56:17 EDT --- Vladimir Ermakov, please, chek files: ls -l /usr/share/apps/sim/icons Try change theme in SIM-settings. P.S. Very thank you for feedback, but please, stringently ask to continue speaking for non-review theme open new bug report! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 21:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202158.m9KLwAQd004603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #5 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-20 17:58:09 EDT --- There, I still have some questions: - the author said it will keep using the subversion revision number as a version numbering, but he also said that he don?t mind to have the pre-release scheme of versioning. I believe that following the upstream version, even if it get weirdly big version numbers is the way to go, but what is your opinion. - About the desktop files I don't like the fact that all the puzzles get cluttered on the menu, but I don't know how to fix this. The ideal solution would be for a submenu for the puzzle collection inside the game menu. Is this feasable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202200.m9KM0NOc005096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #6 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-20 18:00:23 EDT --- Wait I just found a bug on the above submitted files. I will fix it and upload a new pair in a few minutes, sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:05:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202205.m9KM5Xpx001133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:05:32 EDT --- printoxx-1.6-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:04:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202204.m9KM4JLl000543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:04:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460838] Review Request: printoxx - Print image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202204.m9KM4GZf005597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460838 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:04:15 EDT --- printoxx-1.6-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202204.m9KM46L6005522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:04:05 EDT --- python-webtest-1.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:05:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461007] Review Request: libftdi - Library to program and control the FTDI USB controller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202205.m9KM53sW006022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461007 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:05:02 EDT --- libftdi-0.14-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464313] Review Request: memtester - Utility to test for faulty memory subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202204.m9KM4UCb005641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464313 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:04:29 EDT --- memtester-4.0.8-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:05:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202205.m9KM5C91006077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:05:11 EDT --- DivFix++-0.30-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202204.m9KM48xc005554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:05:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:05:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] New: Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Summary: Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf-1.0.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This is dnsperf, a collection of DNS server performance testing tools. For more information, see the dnsperf(1) and resperf(1) man pages. See http://www.nominum.com/services/measurement_tools.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202208.m9KM8pJe001657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:08:50 EDT --- gromacs-4.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:10:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202210.m9KMAdnR002214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #7 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-20 18:10:38 EDT --- I just realized that I didn't have posted the URLs before :P The problem was fixed and the files uploaded here : http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles-8200-2.bog9.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454462] Review Request: ksplice - Patching a Linux kernel without reboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202206.m9KM6IMM001324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454462 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:06:17 EDT --- ksplice-0.9.1-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:10:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459631] Review Request: insight - GDB debugger GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202210.m9KMArSU007425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459631 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:10:52 EDT --- insight-6.8-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:10:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464313] Review Request: memtester - Utility to test for faulty memory subsystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202210.m9KMAec3007354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464313 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:10:39 EDT --- memtester-4.0.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459915] Review Request: freedink-data - Adventure and role-playing game (data) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202211.m9KMB1bg007466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459915 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:11:00 EDT --- freedink-data-1.08.20080920-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:06:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459916] Review Request: freedink-dfarc - Frontend and .dmod installer for GNU FreeDink In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202206.m9KM6so4006546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459916 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:06:53 EDT --- freedink-dfarc-3.2.1-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:15:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202215.m9KMFGlh003472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:15:16 EDT --- apt-mirror-0.4.5-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451407] Review Request: python-webtest - Helper to test WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202211.m9KMBQwY002431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451407 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:11:26 EDT --- python-webtest-1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:12:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458338] Review Request: DivFix++ - A program to repair broken AVI file streams by rebuilding index part of file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202212.m9KMC5BI002532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458338 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:12:04 EDT --- DivFix++-0.30-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:15:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464308] Review Request: apt-mirror - APT sources mirroring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202215.m9KMFKTc003533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464308 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:13:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202213.m9KMDMMf008092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #21 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-20 18:13:21 EDT --- Michael Schwendt, may bebest solution is to fill bug to upstream ( http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=413085&group_id=100070&func=browse )? Would you do that? Or I can do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:17:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459908] Review Request: freedink - Adventure and role-playing game (engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202217.m9KMHT95009364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459908 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-20 18:17:28 EDT --- freedink-1.08.20080920-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:41:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202241.m9KMfg63007747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-20 18:41:41 EDT --- Isn't "reflexion" primarily a British spelling? Actually wikipedia indicates that it's rare now even in British usage, with "reflection" being much more common. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:49:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202249.m9KMnrqe014147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #23 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-20 18:49:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #19) > > mlt does support sox with pkg-config except the sox 14.1.0 .pc file is wrong: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2076270&group_id=10706&atid=310706 > Why ? > Even if sox.h ends in $(PREFIX)/include , /usr/include will be in the default > path, so the header will be found anyway... It would be better to have sox.h > not in the default path and use -I/usr/include/sox each time sox libraries are > meant to be linked. You can debate that with the sox developers, not me; it's not my project. The fact of the matter is that it installs a sox.h to includedir defaulted as $prefix/include, and when the $prefix is not /usr, then the header can not be found by simply using 'pkg-config --cflags' Anyways, I suppose this problem does not affect your packaging and therefore worth further discussion, but the runtime compatibility problem between mlt and sox 14.1.0 remains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 22:54:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202254.m9KMsH46014956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #24 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-20 18:54:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > There is still some work, specially for (at least): > - The multilibs compliance (to split the binaries and the libraries). Is there something I should do to facilitate this? I have already fixed up mlt++ to use pkg-config (svn trunk) and submitted a patch to kdenlive. > - Have runtime tests to be done. > If the frei0r-devel package isn't ready, it could be possible to enable it > later... I do not understand. Is there some upstream change you are suggesting? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 23:12:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202312.m9KNCNUj018264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #2 from Ian Main 2008-10-20 19:12:22 EDT --- OK, I've addressed all the things above and no complaints from rpmlint. I couldn't use the smp_mflags however as it tried to spawn multiple qmf-gen's and would break the build. I re-uploaded the spec and src rpm. They are now at: http://ovirt.org/libvirt-qpid.spec ovirt.org/libvirt-qpid-0.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 23:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202317.m9KNHLUM013527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 --- Comment #3 from Ian Main 2008-10-20 19:17:21 EDT --- sorry http://ovirt.org/libvirt-qpid-0.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 23:25:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202325.m9KNPKVg020214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #10 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-10-20 19:25:19 EDT --- Hi, Terje I've fixed some minor errors in the upstream tarbal. Beda have already fixed it in the upstream now, so, here we go again: [1] - bkchem.spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.3/bkchem.spec [2] - bkchem.src.rpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.3/bkchem-0.12.3-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 20 23:30:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 19:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226425] Merge Review: sox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810202330.m9KNUHDq020931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226425 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 19:30:16 EDT --- The current sox in Rawhide in broken (but should works) http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2076270&group_id=10706&atid=310706 This is reported by the mlt developer on the mlt review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Please note that sox-devel in F-9 is (this time) completely broken. (which the current bug was meant to address). Do you have any tough to the "Patch to avoid_version of module in sox 14.1.0" which is now a backport ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:05:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447075] RFE: Add the ssh-vulnkey command to detect weak SSH keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210005.m9L058Yp020589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447075 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-20 20:05:06 EDT --- If there's no package to review, this should certainly not be in the "Package Review" component. I'm just going to close this. If someone actually wants to submit a package for review, please open a regular package review ticket. If someone wants to keep this open, please change the component to something proper so that it doesn't appear in the package review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210034.m9L0YY1D024484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 20:34:32 EDT --- @Antony I cannot have both gluegen and jogl to build separately, even if they use the same snapshot. Here are the current attempts: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jogl-1.1.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/jogl.spec http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gluegen-1.1.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gluegen.spec Do you have any advices ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:37:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210037.m9L0bL9b030086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #20 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 20:37:20 EDT --- reopened -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:55:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210055.m9L0tpCX027928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 David Kaylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:54:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210054.m9L0sjhL027435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 David Kaylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dkaylor at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from David Kaylor 2008-10-20 20:54:44 EDT --- I am not in the packager group and unable to approve packages but will do a review for this package. For starters, this package built and installed fine on Fedora 9 x86_64. Here is the output for rpmlint: fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper fsniper.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/fsniper fsniper 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I think this makes sense since fsniper is to be run as a daemon and will post more feedback tonight after going through the guidelines more thoroughly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458714] Review Request: libkate - Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210053.m9L0rHmf032707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458714 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |Not API/ABI stable yet --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-20 20:53:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libkate.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libkate-0.2.5-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Libraries to handle the Kate bitstream format This library has been updated often last weeks. According to the libkate developer, that's not sure that libkate is API/ABI stable . So I don't expect to use it in "major repositories", unless anyone has better advices. ?!.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 00:59:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210059.m9L0xhDU001150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 David Kaylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dkaylor at gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #23 from David Kaylor 2008-10-20 20:59:42 EDT --- I am going to review this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] New: Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 Summary: Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: uprakash at renditionsoftware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/rendition-common.spec SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/rendition-common-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: The rendition-common package contains the necessary shared libraries for running many Rendition applications and utilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:28:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210128.m9L1SC06000528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #1 from Uday Prakash 2008-10-20 21:28:11 EDT --- For more information about Spin, please go to http://www.renditionsoftware.com/spin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:27:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] New: Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Summary: Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: uprakash at renditionsoftware.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/spin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/spin-0.9.4-1.src.rpm Description: Spin is a lightweight, performance-optimized development tool for creating simple, integrated, easy-to-manage software bundles (known as 'software appliances', 'custom distributions', or 'custom spins') containing operating system components, applications and related configuration. Spin allows starting from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, CentOS 5, Fedora 9 and Fedora 10. Spin is comparable to pungi and revisor, with added support for RHEL and CentOS as base distributions, automatic generation of a config RPM using user-provided files and scripts, and performance enhancements of 50-90%. Note: Customers who create appliances based on RHEL will need to separately purchase RHEL licenses for all installed client systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:27:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210127.m9L1RVsw005636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 Uday Prakash changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210127.m9L1RU2F005616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Uday Prakash changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:57:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462818] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210157.m9L1viY9010047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462818 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmz at pobox.com --- Comment #16 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-20 21:57:42 EDT --- *** Bug 467748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 01:57:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467748] Review Request: perl-Net-SMTP-SSL - SSL support for Net::SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210157.m9L1vhco010018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-20 21:57:42 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 462818 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 02:11:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210211.m9L2Bdxf007644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #2 from David Kaylor 2008-10-20 22:11:38 EDT --- This packages is in good shape. After checking against the guidelines and doing another compile with mock, I found just a couple of minor things: Exiting with 0 at the end of the %pre script is preferable to failing (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups). Patches should have a link to an upstream bug or a comment (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#All_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 02:19:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210219.m9L2JCY7008801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #24 from David Kaylor 2008-10-20 22:19:11 EDT --- Add upstream bug link to patch file: http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.7-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 02:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 22:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210256.m9L2usTo015364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-20 22:56:53 EDT --- Looks good; %check section is present and passes; generically-named binary and headers have been renamed or moved into their own directory. The only minor thing I can point out is that it looks perhaps a bit odd to have fplll_micro and fplll_verbose, but fplll-generate (underscores versus a dash). It's minor, so feel free to import what you like but of course it would be tough to change after import. If there are basic things not mentioned in the packaging guidelines, please feel free to point them out so that the packaging committee can address them. Unfortunately the review-o-matic isn't going to be able to catch anything more than trivial issues, and you could get the same just by doing scratch builds and running rpmlint on the result. Anyway, this package looks fine to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210402.m9L42hWB024491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-21 00:02:42 EDT --- I agree with fixing the discrepancy between the underscores and the hyphen. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libfplll Short Description: LLL-reduces euclidian lattices Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:09:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210409.m9L49U8t030719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 00:09:28 EDT --- The odd permissions error doesn't need fixing; it's not your problem. I only mention it because it is produced by rpmlint and anyone who builds the package and checks the output of rpmlint can potentially see the complaint (no matter how bogus) and may expect to see it addressed in the review. Packaging code from a dead upstream poses a particular problem. If there's really no upstream web site to refer to then it would make sense to specify no URL tag, or to continue to refer to the old location (in the hope that it will come back), but in either case it would be beneficial to add an explanatory comment to the spec. The same goes for the Source1: URL; if there's no authoritative source for that file then you'll need to add a comment to that effect. I'm guessing that the Source: URL is just pointing at your project's sourceforge site, and that you're just mirroring the dead upstream site. Or are you taking over maintenance of the code? The real concern with a dead upstream is ongoing maintenance and specifically security issues. I don't see much possibility for security vulnerabilities in this code, but you never know, and if upstream is dead then the burden falls entirely on you, the maintainer, to deal with issues of that nature. Anyway, it's up to you and I'm sure you're aware; I'm just making sure that it gets said at some point before the package is in the distro. So basically the spec just needs a little bit of commenting about the state of upstream and the lack of a download location for Source1:. My checklist follows; since there's not really any upstream, several of my usual checklist items will be missing. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: Levenshtein.so()(64bit) python-Levenshtein = 0.10.1-5.fc10 python-Levenshtein(x86-64) = 0.10.1-5.fc10 = libpython2.5.so.1.0()(64bit) python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210416.m9L4G7gN026646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 00:16:05 EDT --- Is there an updated srpm that should be reviewed? I'll be happy to look at this package but I'm not sure if Yaakov is still working on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:17:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287191] Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache authentication for the CAS Single Sign-On service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210417.m9L4HFKC026746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287191 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 00:17:14 EDT --- Hmm, there's been no response in nearly nine months. Josh, did you still want to get this package into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:20:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210420.m9L4KSpf032563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 00:20:27 EDT --- Any updates? It's been almost another three months now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:22:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210422.m9L4MPkM000371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #36 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-21 00:22:21 EDT --- + RPMLint is not clean on SRPM: [rishi at freebook SOURCES]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/sat-solver-0.9.5-1.fc10.src.rpm sat-solver.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 17) sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver.spec 0775 sat-solver.src: W: strange-permission sat-solver-db-corruption-fix.patch 0775 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [rishi at freebook SOURCES]$ RPMLint is not clean on build sub-packages: [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-perl sat-solver-perl.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-perl package contains libraries and perl modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ rpmlint sat-solver-python sat-solver-python.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long The sat-solver-python package contains libraries and python modules to be used inside 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [rishi at freebook SPECS]$ Pretty simple actually. Just replace the tab with equivalent number of spaces on line 17 of sat-solver.spec, and make sure that the files in the SRPM have a permission of 0644. Lines in the description should not exceed 80 characters. + Is this package not meant for Fedora 9? The sat-solver-0.9.5-rpm4.5.90.patch patch broke the build on my Fedora 9 system. In case it is only meant for Fedora 10 and above, you could add a versioned dependency on rpm-devel (BuildRequires) and rpm-libs (Requires) to enforce this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:30:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442714] Review Request: sat-solver - Satisfyability Solver library which can be used to compute inter-package dependencies. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210430.m9L4UKFQ028623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442714 --- Comment #37 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-21 00:30:19 EDT --- According to the Naming Guidelines, package names of Python modules should be prefixed with "python-" or "py". See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 In this case you can use: %package -n python-%{name} ... %description -n python-%{name} ... %files -n python-%{name} Similarly for the Perl sub-package consult: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28perl_modules.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 04:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210431.m9L4V5Fc001715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #15 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-21 00:31:04 EDT --- Thanks, Jason. Yaakov is busy with other stuff at the moment and likely to remain so for a while, so here are the latest spec and SRPM files: http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib-0.4.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm http://bos.fedorapeople.org/ghc-zlib.spec Remember that these need a fresh rawhide ghc (I have ghc-6.10.0.20081007-6.fc11.x86_64) to work. The rpmlint warnings for the binary RPMs are expected and normal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 06:59:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 02:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210659.m9L6xtLI016777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-21 02:59:54 EDT --- Ping, how's the review coming along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210702.m9L720vu022962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #65 from Vladimir Ermakov 2008-10-21 03:01:59 EDT --- # ls -l /usr/share/apps/sim/icons total 1760 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4957 2008-09-23 14:42 additional.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5505 2008-09-23 14:42 amibulb.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13881 2008-09-23 14:42 apple_ichat.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 138163 2008-09-23 14:42 gants.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 71029 2008-10-12 16:15 GPL-Icons.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 126566 2008-09-23 14:42 icq5.1.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25632 2008-09-23 14:42 icq5.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52970 2008-09-23 14:42 icqlite.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8195 2008-09-23 14:42 lovenmoney.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 63201 2008-09-23 14:42 msn.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 56658 2008-09-23 14:42 sim2.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 251987 2008-09-23 14:42 SIM-icons-Crystal-full.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 258805 2008-09-23 14:42 SIM-icons-Nuvola-full.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 246814 2008-09-23 14:42 SIM-icons-XP-full.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65843 2008-09-23 14:42 sim.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19730 2008-09-23 14:42 smiles.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 183691 2008-10-12 16:18 weather.jisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 121850 2008-09-23 14:42 yahoo.jisp please view screenshot http://img378.imageshack.us/img378/6458/simscreenshotnewconnectsj7.jpg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:27:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210727.m9L7R3ou020886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #15 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-21 03:27:02 EDT --- - License is GPLv2+ - rpmlint ok - spec file is good - source md5sum good - packages build - utilities function correctly , i386 and x86_64 2 minor things: - according to guidelines, "--vendor=fedora" should be used for desktop-file-install - the %files section could be written with just 3 lines: %{_datadir}/gupnp-tools %{_bindir}/gupnp* %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop If you're ok with the patch I submitted, consider the package APPROVED. I've tested the package on F-9 x86_64 and F10 i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:34:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210734.m9L7YYqS021760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #1 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-21 03:34:33 EDT --- The package should be named with python in the name, I guess along python-rendition-common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:32:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466795] Review Request: boswars-addons - addon maps for Bos Wars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210732.m9L7WWc1021647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466795 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-21 03:32:30 EDT --- Peter, thanks for review. Package imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:36:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210736.m9L7a9oC028083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus at free.fr --- Comment #2 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-21 03:36:08 EDT --- In my opinion, the name is too generic, for an argumentation, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Use_of_common_namespace -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 07:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461131] Review Request: sim - Simple Instant Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210755.m9L7tFNd031335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461131 --- Comment #66 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-21 03:55:13 EDT --- Stop flame!! Please, if you want solve problem - open new bug. I will not futher answer here on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 08:08:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210808.m9L88p2a028095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot 2008-10-21 04:08:41 EDT --- The authors of the games are not native english speakers, and neither do I. I can either replace 'reflexion' by 'reflection' or by 'puzzle', just like I did in the Summary: tag. Jason, you're are the only native speaker here, so feel free to rephrase as much as you want, I'll probably be ok with it ;-) Anyway, all of this are details that can be adjusted later, so can you please create the cvs module so I can import ? I'll build when we're all ok with the spelling and grammar of the summary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 09:21:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 05:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 275081] Review Request: xenwatch - Virtualization utilities, mostly for Xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810210921.m9L9La5X015382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275081 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #8 from Jan ONDREJ 2008-10-21 05:21:34 EDT --- There is a mix of Source and URL attributes in spec file. URL should contain a website. If there is no website for this package, you can you URL to downloadable files. It's not an URL to download only this package, this should contain at least a list of all available releases. Download URL must contain full path to sources. There is only an exception, if this package contains some code, which is not acceptable for Fedora and packager has it's own distribution or package's upstream is Fedora. More information here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 10:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226526] Merge Review: vim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211038.m9LAcBYs028521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226526 --- Comment #16 from Karsten Hopp 2008-10-21 06:38:10 EDT --- yes, I forgot to re-enable that. Thanks for catching that one, I'll build a fixed package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 10:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211038.m9LAcVCj028577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-21 06:38:30 EDT --- > - according to guidelines, "--vendor=fedora" should be used for > desktop-file-install Actually according to the packaging guidelines the Vendor should only be set if there isn't one already in use. They already use 'gupnp' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > - the %files section could be written with just 3 lines: > %{_datadir}/gupnp-tools > %{_bindir}/gupnp* > %{_datadir}/applications/*.desktop Yes, I'm aware of that but the reason I tend to do it the other way is that you don't get unexpected files that may be introduced on a new release. Its one of those 6 to one, hlaf a dozen to the other things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211108.m9LB8Tgx001352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #17 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-21 07:08:28 EDT --- > Actually according to the packaging guidelines the Vendor should only be set if > there isn't one already in use. They already use 'gupnp' Sounds good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:10:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211110.m9LBAOG4001909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #60 from Karl Lattimer 2008-10-21 07:10:22 EDT --- @Andrea Santilli, after looking at your patch I'd say this is an upstream patch rather than a review request patch. Submit it up on http://bugzilla.gnome.org and it may be approved in the upstream project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:08:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211108.m9LB8JAJ001312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #59 from Karl Lattimer 2008-10-21 07:08:12 EDT --- Latest update, this only works on fedora rawhide, I thought I'd get in early for f10's release :) This has been updated to the latest SVN, which means that some of the older quirks of network manager are gone. Also, as gnome-session has been improved enough we now have a shutdown button!!!! spec: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu.spec rpm: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-2.i386.rpm src: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-2.src.rpm dev: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.12-2.i386.rpm dbg: http://www.wine-doors.org/rpm/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.12-2.i386.rpm @Andrea Santilli, Sorry I haven't included your patch. Although I expect there'll be a further update quite soon so I'll put it in next time the SVN has a significant update. Maybe your patch is an upstream patch and you should then send it up to gnome bugzilla rather than here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:20:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] New: Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Summary: Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/parprouted -0.70-2.fc8.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roma at lcg.ufrj.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, kwizart at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: parprouted is a daemon for transparent IP (Layer 3) proxy ARP bridging. Unlike standard bridging, proxy ARP bridging allows to bridge Ethernet networks behind wireless nodes. Normal L2 bridging does not work between wireless nodes because wireless does not know about MAC addresses used in the wired Ethernet networks. Also this daemon is useful for making transparent firewalls. http://www.hazard.maks.net/ I have been using parprouted for allowing a guest Virtualbox OS to have a different IP from the host OS, when a wireless connection is used. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:29:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] New: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 Summary: Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/litmus-0.1 1-1.fc8.src.rpm OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roma at lcg.ufrj.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, limb at jcomserv.net, kwizart at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: litmus is a WebDAV server test suite, which aims at testing whether a server is compliant with the WebDAV protocol as specified in RFC2518. http://www.webdav.org/neon/litmus/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211140.m9LBeEnU007585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Proxy ARP IP bridging |Review Request: parprouted |daemon |- Proxy ARP IP bridging | |daemon -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 11:45:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:45:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211145.m9LBjF95001404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-21 07:45:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Paulo > > That's really nice to see you participating as a Fedora contributor. > You should have a look at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers > And specially for the yarafray package: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > I will give you few advices on the yafaray package soon. > Jon Ciesla should sponsor you once one (or more) packages will be reviewed and > accepted. So it should be fine if you can submit another package to be > reviewed. Hi, I submitted two more packages: parprouted and litmus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Thanks for the welcome and guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:16:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211216.m9LCG15Y014878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-21 08:16:00 EDT --- I upload to my web old version by mistake. Correct files: SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon-1.6-1.f10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:22:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211222.m9LCM0Ci009021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-21 08:21:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword Short Description: Generate secure random pronounceable passwords Owners: msuchy Branches: devel F-9 F-10 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:48:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456892] Review Request: aget - multi-threaded download accelerator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211248.m9LCmlQM022336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456892 --- Comment #11 from Paul G?ssinger 2008-10-21 08:48:46 EDT --- yes I would like to get sponsored and maintain this package. I read/understood the wiki page and created all needed accounts/mailing lists I dont know what update you are expecting. The package is working, and the ticket is blocked by FE-NEEDSPONSOR which indicates that i need a sponsor. Maybe I missed something. Cheers, Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:53:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211253.m9LCrx35015916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 08:53:58 EDT --- Needs links to spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:54:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211254.m9LCs40T015948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 08:54:03 EDT --- Needs links to spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:54:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211254.m9LCsAl8023776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 08:54:09 EDT --- Needs links to spec and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:52:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:52:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211252.m9LCqJkH023481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:52:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211252.m9LCqQje023528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:51:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211251.m9LCpneS023338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-21 08:51:47 EDT --- So, maybe there is an in-between: Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-6.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Few comments for non-rpm-spec-file-readers: Anyone can rebuild the libproxy package and use --with mozjs --with networkmanager --with webkit to have missing sub-packages built and installable along with the default set of fedora libproxy packages. (libproxy-bin libproxy-python, libproxy-gnome and libproxy-kde) I think we should be able to deal with comps.xml for kde and gnome. But I would like advices from the related desktop team. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 12:58:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211258.m9LCwq6L016966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-21 08:58:51 EDT --- @Ruben Interesting. Which machine do you have ? Does a koji --scratch build also failed for a given Fedora version ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:01:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211301.m9LD1805017856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-21 09:01:07 EDT --- Package successfully builds, provide sane provides. So it is ... APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:02:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211302.m9LD2O9R018047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 09:02:23 EDT --- Starting full review. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:03:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211303.m9LD3Q6L027099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 09:03:26 EDT --- For those just tuning in, I've asked Paulo in an email exchange to begin practice reviews toward becoming sponsored, so you'll likely see those linked here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:05:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211305.m9LD5h02027734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-21 09:05:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Needs links to spec and srpm. Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/litmus.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/litmus-0.11-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: litmus is a WebDAV server test suite, which aims at testing whether a server is compliant with the WebDAV protocol as specified in RFC2518. Additional Info: http://www.webdav.org/neon/litmus/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:14:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211314.m9LDEIeZ029886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #7 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-21 09:14:17 EDT --- Thanks Suchy ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:15:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:15:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211315.m9LDFLe1030306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #6 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-10-21 09:15:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for CC'ing me. > I question my sanity for even looking at this, but I used NIS in a past life > so... > > Here's what rpmlint has to say: > > W: ypbind summary-ended-with-dot The NIS daemon which binds NIS clients to an > NIS domain. > Picky, I guess, but easy to fix. Fixed. > > E: ypbind tag-not-utf8 %changelog > E: ypbind non-utf8-spec-file ypbind.spec > It's the ? in Trond's name; iconv should fix it up. Fixed. > > W: ypbind strange-permission ypbind.init 0755 > rpmlint complains about anything that's not 644 in the SRPM; I don't think > this is a big deal. Init scripts should have 0755 permissions. I suggest to let it be as it is. > > W: ypbind prereq-use /sbin/chkconfig > Prereq: shouldn't be used. Actually the scriptlets and their dependencies > need a few fixes. Fixed using actual https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript > > W: ypbind macro-in-%changelog config > % signs need doubling in %changelog. Fixed. > > W: ypbind patch-not-applied Patch5: ypbind-1.19-debuginfo.patch > I guess this patch isn't needed at all any longer; it should probably just > go. You're right, debuginfo package works fine, patch removed. > > The packaging guidelines require that the buildroot contains %{name}, > %{version} > and %{release}. That's okay yet (fixed in 3:1.20.4-4). > > You shouldn't use %makeinstall unless the usual "make DESTDIR=..." doesn't > work. > Everything seems to work OK with the latter, so.... Fixed. > > You need finegrained dependencies for the scriptlets instead of Prereq: > > Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(preun): /sbin/chkconfig > Requires(preun): /sbin/service > Requires(postun): /sbin/service Commented above. > > Initscripts must not be marked as %config files. Fixed. (But - "A valid exception to this rule would be existing packages where configuration is still done via the init file.". Well, I'm not sure if OTHER_YPBIND_OPTS="" is configuration... Probably not:)) > > There's a whole push to use LSB-standard initscripts, but I'm not sure where it > stands and I'm not going to worry about that here. > > We're working on new standards for the license, but the files in the tarball > don't agree about whether it's GPLv2 only or GPLv2 or later. That's okay yet (you fixed it 1.20.4-7) > > You can probably drop the bash >= 2.0 requirement; rpm will find the need for > /bin/bash on its own, and even FC-1 had bash 2.05b. Bash requirement removed. > > This package should not own /var/yp; the filesystem pakage owns it. Directory removed. > > I'll attach a patch that fixes the minor issues; the license thing will > probably > require consultation with upstream. > > Review: > * source files match upstream: > f49e0706517f2761cfa45f7a02c5e1562a67b104a267b220a37fa3ab217f9e34 > ypbind-mt-1.20.4.tar.bz2 > * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. > * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. > X summary ends in a period, annoying rpmlint > * description is OK. > * dist tag is present. > X build root is missing %{release} > ? license field matches the actual license. > * license is open source-compatible. > * license text included in package. > * latest version is being packaged. > * BuildRequires are proper. > * compiler flags are appropriate. > * %clean is present. > * package builds in mock (development, x86_64). > * package installs properly > * debuginfo package looks complete. > X rpmlint has valid complaints. > X final provides and requires are missing /sbin/service > config(ypbind) = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 > ypbind = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 > = > /bin/bash > /bin/sh > /sbin/chkconfig > bash >= 2.0 > config(ypbind) = 3:1.20.4-1.fc8 > libdbus-1.so.3()(64bit) > libdbus-glib-1.so.2()(64bit) > libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0()(64bit) > libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) > libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) > rpcbind > yp-tools > * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have fortunately exorcised > NIS from my network so I've no way to test this. > * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. > * owns the directories it creates. > X should not own /var/yp > * no duplicates in %files. > * file permissions are appropriate. > * no scriptlets present. > * code, not content. > * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. > * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. > * no headers. > * no pkgconfig files. > * no static libraries. > * no libtool .la files. Changes commited to Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:17:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211317.m9LDHnf8022903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-21 09:17:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Needs links to spec and srpm. Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/parprouted.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/parprouted-0.70-2.fc8.src.rpm Description: parprouted is a daemon for transparent IP (Layer 3) proxy ARP bridging. Unlike standard bridging, proxy ARP bridging allows to bridge Ethernet networks behind wireless nodes. Normal L2 bridging does not work between wireless nodes because wireless does not know about MAC addresses used in the wired Ethernet networks. Also this daemon is useful for making transparent firewalls. Additional info: http://www.hazard.maks.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 13:16:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211316.m9LDGh7e022767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Balint Cristian 2008-10-21 09:16:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openlayers Short Description: A JavaScript library for displaying map data Owners: rezso Branches: F-8 F-9 devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:08:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:08:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211408.m9LE8ktP003314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 10:08:45 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . FIX: Should honor CFLAGS. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds on i386, F-9. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 NA. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. Summary: Fix compiler flags issue. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Also, 0.12 is out, I'd strongly consider updating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:23:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211423.m9LENgI4006236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe at blagblagblag.org --- Comment #2 from jebba 2008-10-21 10:23:41 EDT --- Upstream git is now located here: http://git.dyne.org/index.cgi?url=frei0r/log/ I have sent kwizart's patches to upstream dev for inclusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211422.m9LEMfBK006157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Adam Huffman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bloch at verdurin.com --- Comment #38 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-21 10:22:40 EDT --- Have just tried installing this in F9, both using the binary in koji and by rebuilding myself, and there's an unfulfilled dependency on python-pmw: rpm -ivh /home/adam/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pymol-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64.rpm /home/adam/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pymol-wxpython-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: python-pmw is needed by pymol-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64 (if this needs to be reported in a normal bugzilla entry, let me know) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:28:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211428.m9LESuIO015603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 10:28:55 EDT --- Isn't this a dup of 467001? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467422] F10 branch for vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211433.m9LEXBQ2016746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467422 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-21 10:33:10 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:37:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211437.m9LEb8KI017551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roma at lcg.ufrj.br --- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 10:37:06 EDT --- *** Bug 467856 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:37:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467856] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV server protocol compliance test suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211437.m9LEb7GM017520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467856 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-21 10:37:05 EDT --- Sure is, good catch. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467001 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211448.m9LEmQkL010865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #1 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-21 10:48:25 EDT --- I was confused between libpcap and libcap. Fixed in 1.0.1.0-2 Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf-1.0.1.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 14:48:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211448.m9LEm8V4019333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 Arjan van de Ven changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arjan at linux.intel.com --- Comment #5 from Arjan van de Ven 2008-10-21 10:48:06 EDT --- on how to generate the file list: find / -type f > filelist.txt on the kernel patch; that's still in upstream discussion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:03:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211503.m9LF3IEL013481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #12 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-21 11:03:17 EDT --- All problems were fixed except one - compiler flags: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags "Standard" approach %build export CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS ./configure doesn't pass CFLAGS to gcc, I don't know why. But something like sed -i 's/CFLAGS=@CFLAGS@/CFLAGS=@CFLAGS@ '"$RPM_OPT_FLAGS"'/' Makefile.in works. I recommend put %configure command to build section (but it isn't needed). Otherwise all looks fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:02:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211502.m9LF2H1O013342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #15 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-10-21 11:02:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Packaging code from a dead upstream poses a particular problem. If there's > really no upstream web site to refer to then it would make sense to specify no > URL tag, or to continue to refer to the old location (in the hope that it will > come back), but in either case it would be beneficial to add an explanatory > comment to the spec. Added comment and rather pointed to the pypi entry. > The same goes for the Source1: URL; if there's no authoritative source for that > file then you'll need to add a comment to that effect. I'm guessing that the > Source: URL is just pointing at your project's sourceforge site, and that > you're just mirroring the dead upstream site. Found packages using the wayback machine and added comments to that effect. > Or are you taking over > maintenance of the code? Simply mirroring and not taking over the code. > The real concern with a dead upstream is ongoing maintenance and specifically > security issues. I don't see much possibility for security vulnerabilities in > this code, but you never know, and if upstream is dead then the burden falls > entirely on you, the maintainer, to deal with issues of that nature. Anyway, > it's up to you and I'm sure you're aware; I'm just making sure that it gets > said at some point before the package is in the distro. Yes am aware of these issues. > So basically the spec just needs a little bit of commenting about the state of > upstream and the lack of a download location for Source1:. My checklist > follows; since there's not really any upstream, several of my usual checklist > items will be missing. Done, mostly changes are simply commenting on the lack of upstream and pointing to way back machine. Rebuilt and installed using mock on 9 and rawhide. New files here: SRPM: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc9.src.rpm SPEC: http://translate.sourceforge.net/releases/testing/fedora/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:29:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211529.m9LFTcgF018751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #18 from G?ran Uddeborg 2008-10-21 11:29:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > When you have applied for sponsorship, tell here what is your account name. I just applied for membership in the "packager" group. My FAS account name is "goeran". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211540.m9LFefBf021019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #13 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-21 11:40:40 EDT --- Ahh, i see. I used: %{__make} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" QUIET=no %{?_smp_mflags} Which seems to work, but causes a previous warning to be an error now. So I'll have to make a patch :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:42:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211542.m9LFgGLn021325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-21 11:42:15 EDT --- Just for CFLAGS issue (In reply to comment #12) > %build > export CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS > ./configure > > doesn't pass CFLAGS to gcc, I don't know why. Because configure.ac contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- 35 36 CFLAGS= 37 AC_AIX --------------------------------------------------------------- The line 36 is the culprit. --------------------------------------------------------------- sed -i.cflags -e '/^CFLAGS=$/d' configure --------------------------------------------------------------- before calling %configure will save CFLAGS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 15:07:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211507.m9LF7oUe014608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-21 11:07:48 EDT --- I consult this issue with my sponsor and he said that the it is ok. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:08:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211608.m9LG8vm3025803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #15 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-21 12:08:55 EDT --- Ahh, we lost -D_GNU_SOURCE. I added this to the make line, since it seems it is the only part of CFLAGS that we lose. I also disabled interface-automatic, as this caused unbound to listen on 0.0.0.0 and ::0 instead of just localhost. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-4.fc9.src.rpm initscript: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.init -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211614.m9LGEw7a002526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:14:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211614.m9LGEwgr002500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #13 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-21 12:14:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC Short Description: XMLRPC model class for Catalyst Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:24:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211624.m9LGO3S2028494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(uprakash at renditio | |nsoftware.com) --- Comment #3 from R P Herrold 2008-10-21 12:24:02 EDT --- I see an install time require for: rendition-common Is this in the submission queue as well? -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:31:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211631.m9LGV1oN030293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2008-10-21 12:31:00 EDT --- Yes, see the 'dependent bugs'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 16:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211655.m9LGtD7M009669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-21 12:55:12 EDT --- Versioned symbols patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/configure.in?r1=1.11&r2=1.12 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/Makefile.am?r1=1.22&r2=1.23 http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/gssapi.sym?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 17:02:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211702.m9LH2Exr002948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #39 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-21 13:02:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Have just tried installing this in F9, both using the binary in koji and by > rebuilding myself, and there's an unfulfilled dependency on python-pmw: > > rpm -ivh > /home/adam/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pymol-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64.rpm > /home/adam/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/pymol-wxpython-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > python-pmw is needed by pymol-1.1-9.20081015svn3468.fc9.x86_64 > > (if this needs to be reported in a normal bugzilla entry, let me know) I'm waiting to get F-9 added as a branch for python-pmw (I originally only requested F-10 and EL5 for both, but F-9 was added by request for pymol and not python-pmw): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 I should have it straightened out as soon as the CVS request is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 17:32:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 253355] Review Request: twill - A simple scripting language for Web browsing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211732.m9LHWsOl009693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253355 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Saou 2008-10-21 13:32:51 EDT --- Since I still need the package for elisa, I've updated Luke's 0.9 pre-version to 0.9 final. Note that I'm not really interested in sorting out the issues (if still present) not maintaining the package... I did rename it to python-twill, though : http://thias.fedorapeople.org/review/python-twill/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 18:00:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211800.m9LI0P26015504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 --- Comment #16 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-21 14:00:24 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-pmw New Branches: F-9 Owners: timfenn adding python-pmw to allow for F-9 builds of pymol -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 18:11:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211811.m9LIBiHb025345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 Uday Prakash changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(uprakash at renditio | |nsoftware.com) | --- Comment #5 from Uday Prakash 2008-10-21 14:11:43 EDT --- Thanks, Bill :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 18:58:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211858.m9LIwTao001253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #6 from Uday Prakash 2008-10-21 14:58:28 EDT --- Patrice, Thanks for your feedback! Spin is the product's name, and I would rather not rename the package unless it blocks the package from getting added to Fedora's rawhide. Do you know of the steps I would need to take to request that the package name remain "spin"? That said, if it comes down to it, some new names that I can think of are: rendition-spin, spin-appliance-creator, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442914] Review Request: eg - Git for mere mortals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211909.m9LJ9Ygr027975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442914 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-21 15:09:32 EDT --- James, what's up here? I can't find this package in any repo, could you please have a look? BTW: upstream version is 0.93. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] New: Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 Summary: Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jreznik at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/kdm-theme/pkg/solar-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/kdm-theme/pkg/solar-kde-theme-0.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: KDE theme based on Fedora 10 Solar artwork containing KDM Solar Mania theme, KSlash Solar Comet theme and Solar background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211938.m9LJcqeX001302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #6 from Karel Zak 2008-10-21 15:38:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > on how to generate the file list: > find / -type f > filelist.txt shouldn't be better to explicitly define (somewhere in /etc/sysconfig/sreadahed) relevant directories (/bin, /sbin, /usr, ..)? "find /" could be real overkill for people with large full disks (I guess we needn't porn pictures and mp3 files during the boot... :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:36:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211936.m9LJaogE009778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-21 15:36:49 EDT --- So is that approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211940.m9LJev9m002281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #40 from Adam Huffman 2008-10-21 15:40:56 EDT --- Have now installed it on a Rawhide box. Tried running some of the demos but the demo files seem to be missing?: ExecutiveProcessPDBFile-Error: Unable to open file '/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/pymol_path/data/demo/il2.pdb'. Exception in thread Thread-2: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/threading.py", line 446, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/wizard/demo.py", line 280, in roving self.cmd.load("$PYMOL_DATA/demo/il2.pdb") File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/importing.py", line 696, in load if _self._raising(r,_self): raise pymol.CmdException CmdException: ExecutiveProcessPDBFile-Error: Unable to open file '/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/pymol_path/data/demo/il2.pdb'. Exception in thread Thread-3: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/threading.py", line 486, in __bootstrap_inner self.run() File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/threading.py", line 446, in run self.__target(*self.__args, **self.__kwargs) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/wizard/demo.py", line 280, in roving self.cmd.load("$PYMOL_DATA/demo/il2.pdb") File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/importing.py", line 696, in load if _self._raising(r,_self): raise pymol.CmdException CmdException: [adam at vaio data]$ pwd /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/pymol_path/data [adam at vaio data]$ ls pymol Is there a problem with the licensing of the demo files or do they just need to be added? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 19:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810211956.m9LJuflr005724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #41 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-21 15:56:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > > [adam at vaio data]$ pwd > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/pymol/pymol_path/data > [adam at vaio data]$ ls > pymol > > Is there a problem with the licensing of the demo files or do they just need to > be added? I just never added them - I'll add them to the spec and retag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:04:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212004.m9LK4VWN015317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 16:04:29 EDT --- OK, this looks fine. APPROVED Go ahead and apply for your Fedora account, do the CLA bits and apply for packager access. I will sponsor you and then you can make your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:10:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212010.m9LKA930016729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2008-10-21 16:10:08 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-weberror-0.9-1.fc9.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-weberror.spec * Tue Oct 21 2008 Luke Macken - 0.9-1 - Update to 0.9 - Add python-tempita to the BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:27:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212027.m9LKRls1012042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #14 from Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos 2008-10-21 16:27:44 EDT --- I'd like to revisit the status of this bug report. I am currently working on the following: 1) providing more informative error messages to the user 2) eliminating any parts of the code that were present mostly for debugging purposes (like a sample UI application) and turn cerebro into a purely networking and presence service 3) Is there still an issue with the license? Do I need to update the license to GPLv3+? Isn't this covered by GPLv2+? p. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:40:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467958] New: Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Summary: Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: quantumburnz at hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Upstream URL: http://www.netdirect.ca/software/packages/barry/ Spec & RPMs URL: http://cid-f723c571e9e6d51f.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/Public?view=details Description: Barry is a desktop toolset for managing your BlackBerry(tm) device. (BlackBerry is a registered trademark of Research in Motion Limited.) Output from rpmlint: [Chris at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/* libbarry0.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libbarry.so 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm ignoring this warning because I believe the purpose of libbarry0 is to create this shared library for the other applications. This is my first Fedora RPM submission as well as the first set of RPMs I've ever built. Hence, I also need a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:41:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212041.m9LKfdnt015673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-21 16:41:38 EDT --- mh, this is incorrect. --vendor="fedora" should be the correct way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:41:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212041.m9LKfujG015736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:46:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212046.m9LKkrbD017077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Todd Zullinger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmz at pobox.com --- Comment #10 from Todd Zullinger 2008-10-21 16:46:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > You have --vendor="fedora". Should be --vendor=''. That's all. Huh? is used as a variable in the guidelines. That string is to be replaced by whatever string upstream uses as the vendor id, if they use one. In the case where a .desktop file is being created just for the fedora package or where upstream does not use any vendor id, then --vendor="fedora" is entirely correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 20:46:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212046.m9LKkoR7017037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #7 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-21 16:46:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Patrice, > > Thanks for your feedback! > > Spin is the product's name, and I would rather not rename the package unless it > blocks the package from getting added to Fedora's rawhide. Do you know of the > steps I would need to take to request that the package name remain "spin"? It is not a blocker per the packaging guideline, so you may find a reviewer willing to accept the name -- it won't be me. > That said, if it comes down to it, some new names that I can think of are: > rendition-spin, spin-appliance-creator, etc spin-creator would be nice in my opinion.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:10:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212110.m9LLAMPI021215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-21 17:10:21 EDT --- Just for everyone's info, the unfortunate miswording in the guidelines which gives the impression that --vendor="fedora" should be used if upstream doesn't provide one is being fixed. Please see the draft at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor which was approved by FPC today and may be acked by FESCo as soon as tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212117.m9LLHoeH029767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #8 from Uday Prakash 2008-10-21 17:17:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > spin-creator would be nice in my opinion.. What's currently the spin RPM also installs a '/usr/bin/spin' binary; will that also need to change to '/usr/bin/spin-creator'? Or just the package name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:27:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467814] Review Request: spin - Builds software appliances based on Red Hat, CentOS and Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212127.m9LLRxth031242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467814 --- Comment #9 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-21 17:27:58 EDT --- also the command name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:30:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212130.m9LLUuw3024392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #19 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-21 17:30:55 EDT --- If you include the patch I provided, yes that's APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212131.m9LLVxoQ024492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451405] Review Request: python-weberror - Web Error handling and exception catching middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212145.m9LLjYBB026814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451405 --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2008-10-21 17:45:33 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-weberror-0.9-2.fc9.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-weberror.spec * Tue Oct 21 2008 Luke Macken - 0.9-2 - Add a patch to remove the wsgiref requirement, as it is now in Python2.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:53:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:53:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212153.m9LLrTpJ002756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #20 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-21 17:53:29 EDT --- I'll include the patch but as specified above it was causing me problems and if others report the issues I saw I will revert it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:56:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212156.m9LLu8CD003302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-21 17:56:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gupnp-tools Short Description: GUPnP-tools is a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 21:57:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:57:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212157.m9LLvfo6003479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 22:11:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212211.m9LMB92O005886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 --- Comment #22 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-21 18:11:08 EDT --- > I'll include the patch but as specified above it was causing me problems This one won't, as it checks whether the init call is needed or not, as suggested by the API documentation. I didn't pursue further why it's needed on my F-10 system and not on my other F-9 server, but it's related to ATK and Gnome assistive setups. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 23:17:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] Review Request: rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212317.m9LNHobq008763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 --- Comment #2 from Uday Prakash 2008-10-21 19:17:49 EDT --- I renamed the RPM to python-rendition-common. Renamed Spec URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common.spec Renamed SRPM URL: http://www.renditionsoftware.com/products/spin/review/python-rendition-common-0.9.2-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 21 23:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810212324.m9LNOAni016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #12 from Randall Berry 2008-10-21 19:24:09 EDT --- Simon, Sorry for the confusion this review has caused. According to the recent document posted above there is no longer any need for the vendor tag and since this is a new package you may remove it entirely. Seeing as everything else seems to be in check we'll get this package on its way once the correction is made. Thanks again, Randy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 03:38:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220338.m9M3cVDc014793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-21 23:38:30 EDT --- GPLv2+ is okay, spec was not correct, if I remember. Good, looking for more update soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 03:42:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220342.m9M3guqQ015545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Alias| |python-rabbyt Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-21 23:42:55 EDT --- The package is in very good shape. I have two questions: * The file setup.py contains compile_args = ["-O3"] which overrides the default %{optflags}'s -O2 flag. Do you think this is acceptable? Will the package build without this -O3 option? * This question also concerns snowballz. When I build the snowballz package from your SRPM and try to start the game I get: Traceback (most recent call last): File "snowballz.py", line 11, in from player import Player File "/usr/share/games/snowballz/player.py", line 2, in import ai File "/usr/share/games/snowballz/ai.py", line 2, in import data File "/usr/share/games/snowballz/data.py", line 7, in import font File "/usr/share/games/snowballz/font.py", line 3, in import rabbyt.fonts ImportError: No module named fonts It can't find the rabbyt module fonts. Did you forget to package this module or is this entirely a snowballz bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 04:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220420.m9M4KHPv021235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #21 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux at gmail.com> 2008-10-22 00:20:16 EDT --- i am getting confused .. lowercase or tarball name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 04:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220459.m9M4xNY3026012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-22 00:59:22 EDT --- Taking a closer look at the source I think that is a deprecated module. Well I may be wrong but snowballz definitely needs to be corrected somehow. By the way it would be nice if you could provide a doc subpackage with the content of the "docs, examples, tests" directories from the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 05:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220512.m9M5CuQm003931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #11 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-22 01:12:54 EDT --- MUST Items: xx - rpmlint is unclean on SRPM + [rishi at freebook SRPMS]$ rpmlint libzypp-4.27.24.1-1.fc9.src.rpm libzypp.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [rishi at freebook SRPMS]$ OK - follows Naming Guidelines OK - spec file is named as %{name}.spec xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + http://en.opensuse.org/Libzypp/ seems a better choice for the URL tag. + The Source0 tag should have a valid URL pointing to the upstream release tarball. This is an important requirement. In case upstream does not provide any such tarball, the Spec should have a comment above the Source0 tag describing how the sources were obtained to create the package. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL + Could you throw some light on why it is a problem to build the language bindings on Fedora? Is it because of the ruby-rpm breakage in Rawhide? + It is not really necessary to create %{_target_platform}. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/cmake#Specfile_Usage + To preserve timestamps you could consider using: make install INSTALL="%{__install} -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} + You could consider shipping COPYING and TODO as %doc. What about the doc/persistency-concept.txt and Doxygen documentation? + There libzypp package does not own the %{_libdir}/zypp and %{_datadir}/zypp directories, which it should. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories + Since the .desktop file has a MimeType key, and you are installing icons in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor, you need to use the appropriate scriptlets. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache + Some of the names in this package contain terms (like package-manager) which can be considered too generic. Has this been discussed elsewhere? OK - license meets Licensing Guidelines OK - License field meets actual license OK - upstream license file included in %doc OK - spec file uses American English OK - spec file is legible ?? - sources might not match upstream sources + As noted earlier, please document how the sources were obtained. Place a comment above the Source0 tag for this. xx - package does not build successfully + Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/libzypp-4.27.24.1-1.fc9-root-rishi error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/zypp/zypp-query-pool The tools/registration/CMakeLists.txt file has hard-coded 'lib' as the destination of zypp-query-pool. On 64-bit systems it should be 'lib64'. You could use sed to replace 'lib' with the value of %{_lib}. ?? - ExcludeArch not needed ?? - missing build dependencies + Can not verify because package fails to build. OK - no locales OK - %post and %postun invoke ldconfig OK - package is not relocatable xx - missing dependency on package that creates directory + The libzypp package should have a 'Requires: hicolor-icon-theme', which owns the %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor directory. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FileAndDirectoryOwnership + Similarly, the -devel subpackage should have a 'Requires: cmake'. OK - no duplicates in %file OK - file permissions set properly OK - %clean present OK - macros used consistently OK - contains code and permissable content OK - -doc is not needed OK - contents of %doc does not affect the runtime OK - header files in -devel OK - no static libraries xx - missing dependency for pkgconfig files + The -devel package should have a 'Requires: pkgconfig' since it provides a .pc file. OK - library files without suffix in -devel OK - -devel requires base package OK - no libtool archives xx - %{name}.desktop file not installed properly + You should use desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if the package installs a .desktop file and add a 'BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils'. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files OK - does not own files or directories owned by other packages OK - buildroot correctly prepped OK - all file names valid UTF-8 SHOULD Items: xx - upstream does not provide license text + It would be nice if upstream could provide the text of the GPLv2 in a separate file. xx - no translations for description and summary xx - package does not build in mock successfully + It needs sat-solver which is not yet in the repository. ?? - package builds on all supported architectures ?? - package functions as expected + Other components of the Zypper stack are needed to verify functionality. xx - scriptlets are missing + As noted above, required scriptlets are missing. OK - subpackages other than -devel are not needed OK - pkgconfig files in -devel OK - no file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 05:23:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220523.m9M5NLNr005428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #16 from Yaakov Nemoy 2008-10-22 01:23:19 EDT --- Sorry, school's kicking my butt again. :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 05:31:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220531.m9M5Vo3d031283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #9 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-22 01:31:49 EDT --- Hi Orcan, snowballz is just compatible with python rabbyt 0.8.1 or 0.8.0 not with other versions. Changes from Version 0.8.1 to Version 0.8.2 * Removed deprecated fonts and vertexarrays modules. * Fixed various problems with the Quad class's properties. * Fixed problems compiling with new versions of pyrex. I found the old (0.8.1) Rabbytspec & -sources on my PC, created a SRPM and uploaded it again. SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.1/python-rabbyt-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.1/python-rabbyt.spec very strange, in this version i included a patch for the compileargs. yes Rabbyt 0.8.2 will build with -02 (the standard). I include the patch in the current spec. Thanks for this hint. SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt-0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 05:50:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220550.m9M5oBgw001711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-22 01:50:10 EDT --- > By the way it would be nice if you could provide a doc subpackage with the > content of the "docs, examples, tests" directories from the source. perhaps 3 subpackages docs examples and test? i already thought about it, i left it out, because i thought it's not really relevant. mh :-/ i will include it... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 06:31:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220631.m9M6VG9x007542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-22 02:31:15 EDT --- Hi Simon, I checked the hg copy of snowballz. It looks like they changed a lot of dependencies. Besides rabbyt, snowballz will now depend on pyglet, which depends on avlib, which depends on ffmeg, which is not in Fedora. So, I think a 3rd party repo will be a better place to put snowballz. I will ask the ffmpeg developer of rpmfusion if he could deal with avlib. After that's done we can take care of pyglet and finally of snowballz. Do you have an rpmfusion account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 06:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226211] Merge Review: openhpi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220639.m9M6dNoC008734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226211 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2008-10-22 02:39:22 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: openhpi New Branches: F-10 Owners: sharkcz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 06:48:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220648.m9M6mxTT017652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-22 02:48:59 EDT --- yeah i have a rpmfusion account... You know, this version will be the last open source version of this game? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 07:55:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220755.m9M7tbLT020400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-22 03:55:35 EDT --- Assigning this to me as I will be sponsoring Christopher, I will try to do a review of this somewhere this week. Christopher as already discussed I would like you to do some *non official* reviews of other new packages as part of the sponsorship process. Please add me to the CC for any reviews where you add comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 08:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220819.m9M8JVQc031611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-22 04:19:29 EDT --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 08:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220850.m9M8oGBo030431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #9 from Felix Kaechele 2008-10-22 04:50:14 EDT --- Are you still interested in maintaining this? I use this on a regular basis at my school. I would like to take over the maintenance for this package if you aren't interested anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 08:52:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 04:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220852.m9M8quxc005239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-22 04:52:21 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: tcludp-1.0.8.tar.gz 60dd3a553fc8e579ecfd6622252da2d2 OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:02:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220902.m9M92k45032591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220902.m9M92IvB007075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-22 05:02:17 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: 3f6dbec91a305f97475d155ca6b1b563 tclvfs-20080503.tar.gz OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. PASS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:20:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226211] Merge Review: openhpi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220920.m9M9KOum003979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226211 --- Comment #2 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 05:20:23 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:20:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226211] Merge Review: openhpi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220920.m9M9KjZB010941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226211 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:22:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220922.m9M9MRG6004318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 05:22:26 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:23:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467703] Review Request: lekhonee - A blog client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220923.m9M9NC56011413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467703 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:28:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220928.m9M9STsG005481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220927.m9M9RUne005334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 05:27:29 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220940.m9M9ekQH015093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 05:40:45 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:41:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220941.m9M9fE0v015277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:48:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220948.m9M9mPQN016594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #7 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-22 05:48:24 EDT --- Answer from Sam Vilain : AFAIK the original author has not responded to requests for relicensing under GPLv2. Which is odd, given that another of their projects, Tangram was *only* available under the GPL, and it *required* Set::Object. Hmm.. Could get a notary public to serve them notice of the intention to relicense Set::Object as GPL under the requirements of the license for Tangram. If they don't make claim, then it should be able to be relicensed, I'd guess. Cheers, Sam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 09:57:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810220957.m9M9vgh1018211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #8 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-22 05:57:41 EDT --- I'll try to contact the original author (Jean-Louis Leroy) first. Commments from fedora-legal on the notary idea are welcome nevertheless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:23:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221023.m9MANhFw015923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 --- Comment #14 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 06:23:42 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:24:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221024.m9MAO5xg023143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:28:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221028.m9MASBKt016758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 06:28:10 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:28:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221028.m9MASWLc016795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:31:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221031.m9MAV5lj024490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 --- Comment #9 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 06:31:04 EDT --- cvs done including F-10 branch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:31:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464621] Review Request: etherboot - roms needed for pxe boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221031.m9MAVXOU024596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:33:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221033.m9MAXCg8017675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 --- Comment #6 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 06:33:11 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:33:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221033.m9MAXeV9017734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:34:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221034.m9MAYhVR024937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-22 06:34:42 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:35:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466879] Package Review: perl-Crypt-GeneratePassword - Generate secure random pronounceable passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221035.m9MAZFTZ025302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466879 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:39:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221039.m9MAdFi5025917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543 --- Comment #54 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-10-22 06:39:12 EDT --- I just submitted QMTest (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003). I will release Synopsis 0.11 within the next week, and submit an updated source package here at the same time. Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 10:37:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 06:37:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] New: Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Summary: Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: seefeld at sympatico.ca QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I'd like to submit the attached package for inclusion into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 11:28:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221128.m9MBS6sY028294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |atkac at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atkac at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 11:56:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221156.m9MBus0i008748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-22 07:56:53 EDT --- source files match upstream: YES package meets naming and versioning guidelines: YES specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently: YES dist tag is present: YES build root is correct: YES license field matches the actual license: ??? license is open source-compatible??? License text included in package: NO latest version is being packaged: YES BuildRequires are proper: NO compiler flags are appropriate: NO %clean is present: YES package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64): NO debuginfo package looks complete: NO rpmlint is silent: NO final provides and requires look sane: YES %check is present and all tests pass: YES (check is not present) owns the directories it creates: YES doesn't own any directories it shouldn't: YES no duplicates in %files: YES file permissions are appropriate: YES code, not content: YES documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary: YES ----- - could you please tell me where exactly licence can be found? I wasn't able to find it. - BuildRequires missing: openssl-devel, krb5-devel - you are not passing $RPM_OPT_FLAGS to gcc - debuginfo is broken due missing -g option (it is included in RPM_OPT_FLAGS) - rpmlint warning: dnsperf.x86_64: W: non-standard-group System Environment/Utilities -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 12:45:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445537] Review Request: tightvnc - VNC software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221245.m9MCjIga020469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445537 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:02:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463791] Review Request: compat-db45 - The Berkeley DB database compatibility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221302.m9MD2ThZ017171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463791 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jindrich Novy 2008-10-22 09:02:28 EDT --- Jason, let's go on in the discussion in the main bug. This review is now useless for the reasons noted in comment #6 in #459710. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:02:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463792] Review Request: compat-db46 - The Berkeley DB database compatibility library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221302.m9MD2vPW024548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463792 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:10:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221310.m9MDAKkg026282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-22 09:10:19 EDT --- Next release, with this correction, will be in +-1 month. Should we go ahead with a modified tarball, or wait for the new release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:20:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221320.m9MDKlDx028469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:20:46 EDT --- Where are your spec/srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221331.m9MDVPOt023103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:31:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:40:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221340.m9MDetVL032619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:40:53 EDT --- ping again?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:39:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221339.m9MDdsIr032153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:39:52 EDT --- Does it still seem than you cannot check out rxtx module from Fedora CVS? Would you try it again? (If you can check out, please try to build). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:46:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221346.m9MDkQ14001819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #7 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-22 09:46:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will > be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to > have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the > best solution in my opinion. Well, this is not solution. tightvnc is forked vnc so both packages have same code, same binaries etc. So we have to have vnc or tightvnc but not both. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:47:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221347.m9MDlN8s026729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at marcbradsh | |aw.co.uk) --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:47:22 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:46:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221346.m9MDktEM001976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fkooman at tuxed.net | |) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 09:46:53 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 13:58:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221358.m9MDwFkg004632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-10-22 09:58:14 EDT --- Hmm, something went wrong in my attempt to attach it. Here are external links: http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpm/qmtest-2.4-1.fc9.src.rpm http://synopsis.fresco.org/download/srpms/qmtest.spec Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 14:45:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221445.m9MEjbaE007063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 14:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221449.m9MEnuqd014670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-22 10:49:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ruby-pam New Branches: None Owners: bkearney The original package name was incorrect. It should be renamed rubygem-pam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 14:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465381] Review Request: sugar-moon - Lunar Activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221458.m9MEwwQJ016409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465381 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:04:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221504.m9MF4ejM010319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-22 11:04:39 EDT --- The rpm is in "works for me state" so I'll review it a bit later today (unless someone beats me to it, I've understood we want this package reviewed asap) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:11:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221511.m9MFB0O7011958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #2 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-22 11:10:59 EDT --- Update Spec URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme-0.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Still missing to package default user face icon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:14:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463266] Review Request: globalplatform - Access OpenPlatform and GlobalPlatform smart cards library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221514.m9MFElCX012335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463266 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fkooman at tuxed.net | |) | --- Comment #11 from Fran?ois Kooman 2008-10-22 11:14:45 EDT --- pong :) I'm still alive and looking at GPshell packaging, but it's not quite so easy to get this into acceptable shape as it for example includes "HelloWorld.cap" which comes from Sun's Wireless Toolkit as an example with a license which most likely wouldn't be acceptable for Fedora (some weird proprietary license). So I guess I would have to recreate the tar file myself. Next to this it would be nice if GPshell would use pkgconfig for the library locations which it doesn't do right now afaik. So I didn't get around to this yet unfortunately :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:16:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221516.m9MFG6ud019749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 11:16:04 EDT --- Just a question (but maybe important). It seems that you are using Fedora 9 (according to the srpm name). If so, can you rebuild your srpm on Fedora 9? (Note that I am asking on F-9. on F-10 this surely builds). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:18:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221518.m9MFIsqe020156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 11:18:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-tcludp Short Description: Tcl extension for UDP support Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:24:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221524.m9MFOjUW021282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 11:24:44 EDT --- Unfortunately I think that instead of "rawhide" you really mean "from the F-11 branch" because the latest package tagged into rawhide is ghc-6.8.3-8.fc10. I'll have to cook up a mock config to suck in dist-f11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221522.m9MFMxls021110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-22 11:22:58 EDT --- scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=895772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:36:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221536.m9MFauBB023464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #18 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-22 11:36:55 EDT --- Jason, you are of course right. Sorry for my oversight. I hope it didn't waste too much of your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:48:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221548.m9MFmKHG018410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221552.m9MFqi0B019269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 11:52:43 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221552.m9MFqjpY019309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-22 11:52:44 EDT --- Just a note: the fedora.png in the KSplash theme will have to be removed from this packages and added to fedora-logos instead. There also has to be a replacement with the same name and path in generic-logos (without the Fedora trademark in it), so maybe a neutral name like branding.png would be better than fedora.png? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:50:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221550.m9MFos3R019052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 11:50:53 EDT --- Built in rawhide. Updates for F-8 and F-9 incoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:50:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221550.m9MFot6q019104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454012, which changed state. Bug 454012 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:52:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221552.m9MFqfiC025922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 11:52:40 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:01:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221601.m9MG1JUF027615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-22 12:01:18 EDT --- Quickies: 0. URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/F10Themes/Solar 1. License: needs adjusting too, but I'm not sure what too (I'll ask folks in #fedora-art) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:00:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221600.m9MG0HIn027399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 12:00:16 EDT --- For 0.1.7-2: * BuildRequires - build.log says: ------------------------------------------------- 412 checking for NOTIFY_SHARP... 413 no ------------------------------------------------- Now on F-10+ Fedora has "notify-sharp" (imported on Oct-11), so at least add ------------------------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildRequires: notify-sharp-devel %endif ------------------------------------------------- Maybe "Requires: notify-sharp" should also be added on F-10+. * Documents - Please also add "NEWS" file to %doc. ! For F-9 build - If you are using F-9 and you can rebuild your package on F-9, would you tell me if gnome-sharp is updated? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 15:58:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 11:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221558.m9MFwGfV026864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 11:58:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321170) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321170) Fix for issues 1-4 Ok, continuing review: 1) The use of private libedit deserves a TODO comment in the specfile if modifying the package to use system libedit is not feasible at this point. 2) Parallel make is not used - for a reason it seems (fails in some python build phase), this is also a good thing to document in the specfile. 3) There are some typos in various summaries and descriptions. 4) .cvsignore and sources in CVS still contain the ipmitool tarball. 5) openipmigui does not start (F-9 x86_64, non-IPMI system): $ openipmigui Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/openipmigui", line 310, in run(sys.argv) File "/usr/bin/openipmigui", line 294, in run ui = gui.IPMIGUI(top, mainhandler) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/openipmigui/gui.py", line 209, in __init__ self.tree = Tix.Tree(objpane, options="hlist.columns 2") File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/lib-tk/Tix.py", line 1519, in __init__ ['options'], cnf, kw) File "/usr/lib64/python2.5/lib-tk/Tix.py", line 307, in __init__ self.tk.call(widgetName, self._w, *extra) _tkinter.TclError: unknown color name "{#d9d9d9}" 6) openipmigui should have a .desktop file. 7) Can openipmigui be usefully be run as non-root? I'm unable to test because of 5) above. If not, should be changed to use consolehelper(-gtk). Fix for issues 1-4 above is attached (I could commit it myself, but CVS ACLs prevent me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:02:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221602.m9MG2Iwe021139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 12:02:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-tileqt Short Description: QT widget support for Tile Toolkit Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221604.m9MG4AFp027911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 12:04:10 EDT --- 8) %files python and gui should use %{python_sitearch}?instead of %{_libdir}/python*/... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:13:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221613.m9MGDFTV022852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-22 12:13:14 EDT --- I had to been shifting to another place ... sorry for delay on my side ... I will get back to it in a day with complete review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:26:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221626.m9MGQ6VG025124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #7 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2008-10-22 12:26:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321174) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321174) ypbind init script patch I decided to look at init script and fix it to be compliant with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript (Well, main motion to do this was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467861). I think it should be fine, but just for sanity, please check it too. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221631.m9MGVxmw026100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:31:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221631.m9MGVHYv026020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 --- Comment #1 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-22 12:31:16 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: LGPLv3 Actual License: LGPLv3 %doc License: ok (LICENSE.txt) Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5sum 7e92c2a68467d94b63a85367a5dd1c7d) Compile and Build: - F-7: n/a - F-8: builds - F-9: builds - F-10: builds - rawhide: builds - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: not applicable Shared libs: not applicable Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: a warning that I can't explain either File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: ok %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: not applicable Static Libraries in -static package: not applicable pkgconfig Requires: not applicable Library files: ok Devel requires base package: not applicable .la libtool archives: not applicable Duplicate ownership of files/directories: no Remove BuildRoot: yes UTF-8 filenames: no Package APPROVED I can't find duplicate files anywhere inside the rpm or the buildroot itself, so I'm ignoring the warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221635.m9MGZJsr001121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #6 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-22 12:35:18 EDT --- I notice that the FedoraWaves theme has its own folder under wallpapers so I guess I need a bit of help here: is the location /usr/share/wallpapers/{solar.png,solar.png.desktop} really the intended one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:36:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221636.m9MGa5CG001308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|twaugh at redhat.com |ovasik at redhat.com, | |ville.skytta at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 12:36:04 EDT --- The package is in a good shape, the only things I think should be done are: - Drop *.la, - License: MIT instead of BSD, and - %check comments could be updated. Will attach a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:41:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221641.m9MGf8di002188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-22 12:41:07 EDT --- wolfy, both styles of wallpaper works, but maybe we should put it into it's own dir too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:36:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221636.m9MGakbc001402@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 12:36:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321176) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321176) Drop *.la, fix License tag, update comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:46:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:46:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221646.m9MGk3n0003000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #16 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-22 12:46:01 EDT --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound-1.0.2-5.fc9.src.rpm initscript: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/unbound/unbound.init * Wed Oct 22 2008 Paul Wouters - 1.0.2-5 - Only call ldconfig in -libs package - Move configure into build section - devel subpackage should only depend on libs subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:49:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221649.m9MGngbH029399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 12:49:41 EDT --- Well, actually I'm about 1.5 hours into downloading the ghc packages from static-repos. Only about 30MB (out of 77MB) to go! Caching should of course make this reasonable in the future, but it still takes 20 minutes just to pull fresh repodata. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221650.m9MGoRv3029862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 12:50:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-tclvfs Short Description: Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221700.m9MH0gL8031980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-22 13:00:41 EDT --- solar-backgrounds has: License: CC-BY-SA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221656.m9MGuUd6031204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454017, which changed state. Bug 454017 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 16:56:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221656.m9MGuTWX031178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 12:56:28 EDT --- Built in rawhide, F-8 and F-9 updates coming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:06:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:06:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221706.m9MH6QW3006676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 13:06:26 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:06:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221706.m9MH6N74006641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 13:06:22 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc8.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc8.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:08:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:08:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221708.m9MH8Pkc006891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 Jonathan Underwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #43 from Jonathan Underwood 2008-10-22 13:08:22 EDT --- Michal, you need a emacs-%{name} sub-package which contains the byte compiled emacs files (this is distinct from the emacs-%{name}-el subpackage which contains the elsip source files). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:20:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221720.m9MHKQOX003027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #3 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-22 13:20:25 EDT --- Licence can only be found in the .c files. It's not anywhere else, I even checked their website. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf-1.0.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Oct 22 2008 Paul Wouters - 1.0.1.0-3 - Fixed missing buildrequires - Pass proper CFLAGS to gcc - Fix Group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:19:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221719.m9MHJoKq008834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #4 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-22 13:19:50 EDT --- Thanks for review... Ok with droping .la and comments, but about license I have a question - as upstream has BSD license on http://sourceforge.net/projects/openjade/ URL page. How you got the feeling that MIT is more suitable for OpenSP? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:20:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:20:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221720.m9MHKer7009220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #44 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-22 13:20:39 EDT --- > Michal, you need a emacs-%{name} sub-package ... Eh? What do you mean by "you need"? It may be useful for some, although in various cases this is really debatable, but is surely not "needed" if you have .el files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:22:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221722.m9MHMGeD003295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 13:22:15 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:22:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221722.m9MHMiK4003366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 13:22:43 EDT --- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:22:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221722.m9MHMjvE003390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 Bug 454022 depends on bug 454014, which changed state. Bug 454014 Summary: Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:22:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221722.m9MHMDac009569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-22 13:22:12 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:24:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221724.m9MHONck009775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #45 from Jonathan Underwood 2008-10-22 13:24:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > > Michal, you need a emacs-%{name} sub-package ... > Eh? What do you mean by "you need"? It may be useful for some, although in > various cases this is really debatable, but is surely not "needed" if you > have .el files. Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Emacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:30:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221730.m9MHU4aN005161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #42 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-22 13:30:02 EDT --- ok - tagged/built. final spec/srpm: spec url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol.spec srpm url: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/pymol-1.1-10.20081015svn3468.f8.src.rpm Mamoru, ok to close? Also, can you ping someone to update the CVS branch on python-pmw (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250) - i updated the flags, but it doesn't seem to be gathering any attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:28:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461699] Review Request: remoot - ReMoot is a remote control wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221728.m9MHSVk5004683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461699 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-22 13:28:30 EDT --- Thanks you guys for your help to make this package available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:31:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221731.m9MHVSBa011245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #46 from Jonathan Underwood 2008-10-22 13:31:26 EDT --- Actually comment #43 was aimed at the package submitter ("ritz") rather than Michal, apologies for that. But the point stands - byte compilation is necessary, as it provides a speedup when parsing many elisp files (particularly on older machines. Also, if a file doesn't do what it should when byte compiled, then that's a bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 436612] Review Request: avfs - A Virtual File System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221733.m9MHXnfD005712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436612 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221734.m9MHY7XG005751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435276] Review Request: kBuild - A cross-platform build enviroment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221733.m9MHXZUI005631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435276 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:33:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454022] Review Request: coccinella - Chat client with whiteboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221733.m9MHXoxs011464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454022 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 13:33:49 EDT --- New Spec: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/coccinella.spec New SRPM: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/coccinella-0.96.10-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221740.m9MHeOm4012821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 13:40:23 EDT --- Well, first of all: * Some files (under qm/external/DocumentTemplate/) are licensed under ZPLv1.0, which is GPL incompatible. This must need fixing. * By the way some document files refer to the URL http://www.software-carpentry.com/openpub-license.html for the license text but the link is broken. Do the licenses of these files match with doc/cli_reference.xml ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:44:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 254059] Review Request: e16-keyedit - GUI for editing keybindings for Enlightenment, DR16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221744.m9MHi2Rp007499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254059 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-22 13:44:01 EDT --- Yeah! Closed after 13 months. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:54:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465851] Review Request: logstalgia - Web server access log visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221754.m9MHsd1a009401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465851 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-22 13:54:38 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 17:51:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221751.m9MHpvwo014963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Seefeld 2008-10-22 13:51:57 EDT --- Thanks for the quick feedback, and thanks for pointing out the license issue. As you may have noticed, QMTest contains some Zope modules. While I did upgrade some of them a little while ago, I left out a few. It seems I should upgrade all of them, thus getting them all to be licensed under ZPL 2.1, which is GPL compatible. The links to the Software Carpentry are broken because that site isn't alive any more. I will ask the relevant people to see what to do. We will probably pull out those now defunct URLs of those texts. Thanks, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221802.m9MI20Dh011079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-22 14:01:59 EDT --- Before closing this bug, please submit a request on bodhi to push F-9 pymol to the repository. It is highly preferable that you rebuild python-pwm first on F-9 and submit both pymol and python-pwm as one set of request (bodhi supports a request containing several packages) (In reply to comment #42) > Mamoru, ok to close? Also, can you ping someone to update the CVS branch on > python-pmw (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250) - i updated the > flags, but it doesn't seem to be gathering any attention. Please just wait :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:02:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221802.m9MI2UWX016823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:13:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:13:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221813.m9MIDRn7012806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #10 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-22 14:13:25 EDT --- All my concerns were fixed. The remaining warnings are irrelevant for the package in question, as these are supposed to be installed together anyway (docs warning) and are supposed to start upon boot. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:16:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 218022] Review Request: clamsmtp - SMTP filter daemon for anti-virus checking using ClamAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221816.m9MIGAAR013504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218022 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(matthias at rpmforge | |.net) --- Comment #13 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-22 14:16:08 EDT --- Were you going to move the clamd socket and pidfile to /var/run, and the logfile to /var/log? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:19:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230449] Review Request: hostapd - User space daemon for access point In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221819.m9MIJ3QP019694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230449 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(kwizart at gmail.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:18:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221818.m9MIIXAM019606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:28:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221828.m9MISHPq021709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 14:28:16 EDT --- Yes, I think upstream's sf.net License category is a bit inaccurate. Compare COPYING in the OpenSP tarball with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:26:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449595] Review Request: gnome-applet-grandr - GNOME panel applet for XrandR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221826.m9MIQWv6021433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449595 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2 at infradead.org Flag| |needinfo?(lxtnow at gmail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:35:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221835.m9MIZm8r022920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-22 14:35:46 EDT --- please use arabeyes-thabit-fonts as package name (I'll find some reason to get VLGothic-fonts fixed later :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:13:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221813.m9MIDhRq018813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:45:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221845.m9MIjYnx019119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221843.m9MIhsHe018626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-22 14:43:54 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2+ or Ruby Actual License: Ruby %doc License: n/a Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: n/a Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: yes UTF-8 filenames: ok I see no mention of GPLv2+ anywhere in the code/files. And per http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt the license should be Ruby. Fix the license tag and I can approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:46:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221846.m9MIkUp8024728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:46:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221846.m9MIk4sk024649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 18:55:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221855.m9MItATL026484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #19 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-22 14:55:08 EDT --- i already check out and in on monday, unfortunately i can't build it and this week a long national holiday in hungary, but i hope i'll have some free time for this on the next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:08:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221908.m9MJ8oEU023497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-22 15:08:49 EDT --- Fails build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=896281 [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rpmls * | grep faq [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ rpmls * | grep pfs_format_spec.pdf [rpmbuild at rocky i386]$ documentation is still now included. Please updated with doc folder funde installed. rpmlint tells me some packages need docu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:10:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459944] Review Request: pfstools - Programs for handling high-dynamic range images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221910.m9MJAE3J029440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459944 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-22 15:10:13 EDT --- *now=>not, updated=>update, funde=>files *tpyo erorr, I am durnck ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:13:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221913.m9MJDNE4024488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #5 from Paul F. Johnson 2008-10-22 15:13:22 EDT --- rpmlint is clean and nothing seems amiss with the build on my buildsys. Spec file is good and clean and I can't see anything unowned by the package I'm happy for this to go in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:14:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221914.m9MJEN9P024587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #6 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-22 15:14:22 EDT --- Ok, looks exactly as Modern Style of MIT ... therefore will use MIT, thanks for explanation. Built in Rawhide as opensp-1.5.2-8.fc10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221917.m9MJHjDR030934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-22 15:17:44 EDT --- There should be a directory layout like for Fedora Waves, because that way the theme can be set in systemsettings (which expects a layout like that), and it also allows supporting multiple resolutions (we can use the %1 and %2 placeholders in the default plasmarc, e.g. we had wallpaper=Fedora_Waves/contents/images/%1x%2.png). Kevin Kofler -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467627] Review Request: fsniper - A tool that monitors directories for new files and invokes scripts on them In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221922.m9MJM6Oc026391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467627 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Hrozek 2008-10-22 15:22:05 EDT --- Thanks; updated packages: Spec URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper.spec SRPM URL: http://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/fsniper-1.3.1-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221937.m9MJbFRY028911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 15:37:12 EDT --- Finally. This is the first one of these I've seen being done, so I'll have a few probably obvious questions. First off, why the hsc_name macro? Or rather, why go to the trouble of defining it to "ghc" only to use "ghc" explicitly later? Wouldn't it be simpler just to not use the macro at all? If you build a package against ghc-zlib, will it be required at runtime? I guess what's confusing me is all the talk of static linking, and yet the .a file is packaged, which implies that this is really some sort of -devel package needed at compile time. Is there no kind of runtime/-devel split of these packages? There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? Otherwise the %ghc_* macros hide all of the complexity nicely. I'm not sure I'd know how to find a test suite if one were included, so I can't really check that. With some good answers to the above questions I don't see any reason this wouldn't pass review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:44:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221944.m9MJiQ4Q029880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-22 15:44:25 EDT --- One remaining cosmetic thing I noticed but failed to note in previous comments: $ rpmlint -i opensp-1.5.2-8.fc9.x86_64.rpm opensp.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/opensp-1.5.2/ChangeLog The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). Not at all a blocker but would be nice to get it fixed nevertheless. Setting approved already, feel free to close when you've looked into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221913.m9MJDtik029961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Paul F. Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226531] Merge Review: vnc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221951.m9MJpWl4031280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226531 --- Comment #8 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-22 15:51:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Please tell on fedora-devel that you are orphaning vnc, maybe there will > > be takers (for F11). If so, I think that it would be better in any case to > > have a regular review done, so keeping this closed and not reviewed is the > > best solution in my opinion. > > Well, this is not solution. tightvnc is forked vnc so both packages have same > code, same binaries etc. So we have to have vnc or tightvnc but not both. They can be made parallel installable and use alternatives, for example. Or simply have realvnc binaries prefixed. You are orphaning vnc, please follow the procedures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 19:58:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810221958.m9MJw1k8032434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-22 15:57:59 EDT --- So, I guess the current situation is as follows - License should be CC-BY-SA - directory layout should be made more similar to the other existing ones (-> move /usr/share/wallpapers/{solar.png,solar.png.desktop to its own folder) - Source0 should either be a real URL or a comment describing why there is none should be provided - rpmlint has a complaint which seems valid: solar-kde-theme.src: W: non-standard-group User Interface/Desktop We also have solar-kde-theme.noarch: W: no-documentation but this one is safe to ignore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:03:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222003.m9MK3ZZK006580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-22 16:03:34 EDT --- Well, normally there should be at least one %doc file: COPYING (or LICENSE or License.txt or however you fancy calling it ;-) ). Except if upstream doesn't include it, but here we are upstream, so I don't see a good reason not to. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461385] Review Request: hydra - A very fast network logon cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222007.m9MK7aaJ002107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 16:07:35 EDT --- The additional restrictions in LICENCE.Hydra make this non-free (and unacceptable for Fedora). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:06:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222006.m9MK6quA007578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-22 16:06:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Needs links to spec and srpm. Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:10:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222010.m9MKAR1o008197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222009.m9MK9SO4007828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 16:09:27 EDT --- So, what would be very useful from Sun is some sort of explicit patent grant, rather than some handwaving about how Sun "would never" do things. If Sun were to hit hard times in a year, sell all the ZFS patents to someone else, who then sues Fedora for patent infringement, we're screwed, but if we have an irrevocable patent grant from Sun, we're covered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:19:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222019.m9MKJFBO009670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-22 16:19:14 EDT --- I had no complaints because the bundled tsolar-kde-theme-0.1.3.tar.gz does not include any license info. Which , btw, it should do. And there also should be a cosy home for it, so that we could specify a real Source0, together with the URL from comment #5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:23:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222023.m9MKNj0t010609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-22 16:23:44 EDT --- Please assign the package to yourself. You did go through the review guidelines, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:25:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222025.m9MKPHqv011211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-22 16:25:16 EDT --- Should enable ssl support, because many webdav servers use the https protocol. %configure --with-ssl Also, should add BR openssl-devel. Please, see bug 467856. It has a simpler spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:22:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222022.m9MKM1w3010420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-22 16:22:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jmol Short Description: An open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:22:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222022.m9MKMK3E010476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-22 16:22:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint is clean and nothing seems amiss with the build on my buildsys. > Spec file is good and clean and I can't see anything unowned by the package > > I'm happy for this to go in. > > APPROVED Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:36:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461385] Review Request: hydra - A very fast network logon cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222036.m9MKa485007310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461385 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-22 16:36:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The additional restrictions in LICENCE.Hydra make this non-free (and > unacceptable for Fedora). OK, closing the bug then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:44:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222044.m9MKiYnp014026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #3 from John Anderson 2008-10-22 16:44:33 EDT --- Updated with SSL: http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm As far as the simpler spec in bug 467856, it looks like even though he included neon-devel, it was still building against neon included in the source. My patch and other changes are specifically to get it to build against the distro supplied neon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:42:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222042.m9MKgwYZ013945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Andreas Bierfert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andreas Bierfert 2008-10-22 16:42:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Will be fixed upon import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnxml Short Description: C library for parsing, writing and creating XML Owners: awjb Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222052.m9MKqdiS009957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 16:52:38 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 20:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222051.m9MKpqJX009853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 16:51:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Answer from Sam Vilain : > > AFAIK the original author has not responded to requests for relicensing > under GPLv2. Which is odd, given that another of their projects, > Tangram was *only* available under the GPL, and it *required* > Set::Object. Hmm.. > > Could get a notary public to serve them notice of the intention to > relicense Set::Object as GPL under the requirements of the license for > Tangram. If they don't make claim, then it should be able to be > relicensed, I'd guess. I'm not sure that would hold up in the US. The original authors are fully permitted to create something that is license incompatible and not redistributable by anyone other than them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:09:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222109.m9ML9brs013046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 17:09:36 EDT --- CeCILL v1.1 is Free and GPL Compatible, updated on the Licensing page. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:21:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222121.m9MLLkYI020627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #13 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-22 17:21:45 EDT --- - [4] Maybe something like solar-ksplash-logo.png for fedora.png. - [6, 7, 9] I'll prepare layout similar to FedoraWaves for backgrounds. - [5, 8, 10] Licence is OK for me (by-sa), we are attributing sstorari in splash and KDM theme, but still there should be package description with attribution for him for background. For source I think mention that we are upstream and content of src.rpm is ustream is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:31:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222131.m9MLVT7R017561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-22 17:31:28 EDT --- The tarball should contain a README with contents like "This is Free artwork, it can be used under the terms of ... See COPYING for details.", attribution of all the authors and maybe a warranty disclaimer, and a COPYING with the actual text of the CC-BY-SA license. Both should be included as %doc in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:40:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222140.m9MLefOu019006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 17:40:40 EDT --- Great. I think this is done, then. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:45:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222145.m9MLjROh019959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-22 17:45:26 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: wrong Actual License: LGPLv2.1 %doc License: n/a Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 234f6ad9e25c14801fdeb08dce13ecf0) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok License tag is wrong, in setup.rb the license is set to LGPL v2.1 Fix the license please, otherwise the package is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:43:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222143.m9MLh1YJ024204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-22 17:43:00 EDT --- For the boilerplate, something like this should work: These themes are free artwork: you can redistribute them and/or modify them under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike [what version?] license as published by Creative Commons. These themes are distributed in the hope that they will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license for more details. You should have received a copy of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike License along with this program. If not, see . (Where I wrote "[what version?]", this should say something like "3.0 Unported". The link at the bottom should be made to match.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222150.m9MLoktP020835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-22 17:50:45 EDT --- I think I spoke too soon on this one. The lawyers at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (the copyright holder) responded that the existing license terms are the terms. I send them an additional request for the terms to be changed, but I never got any response. I'd strongly encourage Spacewalk to look into porting to some other hash function. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 21:46:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:46:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222146.m9MLkl4K020186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:03:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214751] Review Request: xview - XView widget libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222203.m9MM3hNS023021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214751 --- Comment #20 from Christian Iseli 2008-10-22 18:03:41 EDT --- Still no progress... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:03:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222203.m9MM3kEV023041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski 2008-10-22 18:03:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I'm missing a trailing || : in the %pre client script: > > %pre client > # when upgrading, move /etc/amandates to /var/lib/amanda/amandates > [ -f /etc/amandates ] && > mv /etc/amandates /var/lib/amanda/amandates || : This still needs to get fixed. I would, but ACLs prevent me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:09:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222209.m9MM9ebO028543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-22 18:09:39 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: wrong Actual License: Dual license Ruby and MIT %doc License: n/a Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 214b9e794a3d0b71d63f0d26a500e00e) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok the MIT-LICENSE file is not marked as %doc The spec file in the above post from Jeroen is not the same as the spec used in building the srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:20:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468116] New: Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Summary: Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze-7-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Analyze Description: The Analyze activity helps developers analyze their system. Along with Log Viewer and Terminal, one of three activities that used to make up the developer console. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=896731 [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-analyze-7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-analyze.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-analyze-7-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-analyze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:26:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222226.m9MMQB2D026687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 18:26:10 EDT --- Interesting. Note that the rmd160.c file included in the Perl module http://search.cpan.org/src/CHGEUER/Crypt-RIPEMD160-0.04/rmd160.c grants no rights at all. However, the file at http://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~cosicart/ps/AB-9601/rmd160.c is different and has some sort of advertising clause. The Perl module includes the following rather odd claim: " This copyright does not prohibit distribution of any version of Perl containing this extension under the terms of the GNU or Artistic licences. " Certainly there's a big mess of confusion surrounding all of this. Honestly I think this ticket should just be closed unless someone is really willing to untangle all of it. From what I understand, Spacewalk doesn't need any Perl modules these days anyway, although I think someone should probably check to make sure it isn't incorporating the questionable RIPEMD160 C code in some other fashion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:40:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226477] Merge Review: tanukiwrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222240.m9MMes5Y001008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226477 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jesusr at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 18:40:52 EDT --- *** Bug 434880 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:40:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:40:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222240.m9MMe5L4000902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Ian Weller 2008-10-22 18:40:04 EDT --- Funny that I just recently became interested in this package. If I want to take over this package, would I need to resubmit the review request, or can we consider the package orphaned and I can take it over? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:40:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434880] Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222240.m9MMergH000987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434880 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841 | Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 18:40:52 EDT --- Looking at this old review I'm still a bit confused. I believe the java team has at least one sponsor who can give new folks access. This package is already in the distro, and there's already a merge review ticket open on it. I'm going to go ahead and close this ticket as a dup of the existing review ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 226477 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222242.m9MMgSQp001301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 --- Comment #7 from Nigel Jones 2008-10-22 18:42:26 EDT --- I'm happy either way, if it's best to close it, then that's what we should do :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 22:47:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468120] New: Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Summary: Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-implode.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-implode-5-1.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Implode Description: Implode is a logic game based on the "falling block" model of Tetris. The game starts with a grid partially filled with blocks. The player makes a move by removing adjacent blocks of the same color in groups of three or more. When blocks are removed, higher blocks fall to fill their space, and when a column is cleared, the blocks on either side close to fill the gap. The object of the game is to remove all the blocks. Since the patterns of blocks above changes when lower blocks are removed, the player must carefully decide what order in which to remove the blocks so that there are no isolated blocks left at the end of the game. The levels are generated in such a way that there is always a sequence of removals that clears the board. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=896754 [fab at localhost noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-implode-5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-implode.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i sugar-implode-5-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-implode.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 23:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222346.m9MNkSL7010651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roma at lcg.ufrj.br --- Comment #1 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-22 19:46:27 EDT --- This is NOT an official review (practice review). MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . FIX: Should honor CFLAGS. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds on x86_64, F-8 and F-9 and i386, F-9 (using mock). - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 NA. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK (there is none). - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. - MUST: Any service must be added disabled by default. OK. - MUST: init and sysconfig scripts according to Fedora rules. OK. Summary: Fix compiler flags issue. make %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="%{optflags}" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 23:50:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222350.m9MNoZhU006282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-22 19:50:34 EDT --- Practice review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 22 23:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457690] Review Request: python-flickrapi - python module for flickr api In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810222352.m9MNqnB2011403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457690 --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 19:52:48 EDT --- I guess its probably safer to pretend this ticket never existed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 00:22:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230022.m9N0Mb2l015748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #27 from David Kaylor 2008-10-22 20:22:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > For 0.1.7-2: > > * BuildRequires > - build.log says: > ------------------------------------------------- > 412 checking for NOTIFY_SHARP... > 413 no > ------------------------------------------------- > Now on F-10+ Fedora has "notify-sharp" (imported on Oct-11), > so at least add > ------------------------------------------------- > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 > BuildRequires: notify-sharp-devel > %endif > ------------------------------------------------- > Maybe "Requires: notify-sharp" should also be added on F-10+. I added both. It seems to me that if the build needs notify-sharp, the package will. I can test this better when I have set up a F10 machine. > * Documents > - Please also add "NEWS" file to %doc.> Added both NEWS and TODO > ! For F-9 build > - If you are using F-9 and you can rebuild your package on F-9, would you > tell me if gnome-sharp is updated? I am using and can build on F9. The gnome-sharp package is an official package (gnome-sharp-2.16.1-1.fc9.x86_64). Updated Tasque packages at: http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SRPM/tasque-0.1.7-3.fc9.src.rpm http://www.kaylor.info/fedora/SPEC/tasque.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 00:27:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230027.m9N0RBMA011451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 20:27:09 EDT --- Hmm, something went off the tracks here. Ralf indicated that he approves this, but never assigned it to himself, set any flags or even CC'd himself. The package in comment #7 still builds on rawhide and at a cursory glance it seems OK; if you're still interested in getting this in then I'll go ahead and give it a full looking over and get you through the process of being sponsored and importing, building and releasing the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 00:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230059.m9N0xn5E020576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 --- Comment #2 from John Anderson 2008-10-22 20:59:48 EDT --- Are you interested in making these fixes, otherwise I would be interested in working on this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 01:18:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468128] New: Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Summary: Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-flickrapi/1.1-4/python-flickrapi.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-flickrapi/1.1-4/python-flickrapi-1.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Description: A Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 01:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230116.m9N1Gn3R023415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Andy Theuninck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) | --- Comment #10 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-22 21:16:48 EDT --- The RPM *does* definitely work for me. It installs an egg file instead of sybasect.so. and Sybase.py. Neither file exists on my system and I can still connect to SQL Server from python just fine. I'm removing site.py, site.pyc, and site.pyo because these files already exist (from python-setuptools). If I try to install the RPM with those files included, it conflicts on those files. If there's a "more correct" way to exclude them from the RPM, I'd be happy to use it. I see what you mean about the .csvignore and pstumble, but I can't figure out how to do anything about it. The %{_doc} directory in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT doesn't exist yet in the %install section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 01:35:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230135.m9N1ZgBD021709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #14 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-22 21:35:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Hmm, something went off the tracks here. Ralf indicated that he approves this, > but never assigned it to himself, set any flags or even CC'd himself. > > The package in comment #7 still builds on rawhide and at a cursory glance it > seems OK; if you're still interested in getting this in then I'll go ahead and > give it a full looking over and get you through the process of being sponsored > and importing, building and releasing the package. Yes, thanks - I'd also like to finish off: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 (this package blocks the latter 2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 01:58:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230158.m9N1wfff029844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 --- Comment #2 from John Anderson 2008-10-22 21:58:40 EDT --- Hello again, I'm doing a preview. This is not a full review, as I am not sponsored yet, but it should help get it in shape. FIX - MUST: rpmlint, zsync.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/zsync-0.5/README OK - MUST: package named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: package %{name} matches spec in the format %{name}.spec FIX - MUST: Packaging guidlines, zlib is in the source, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries OK - MUST: Fedora approved license FIX - MUST: The License field must match the actual license. It looks like they're actually using Artistic 2.0 OK - MUST: package includes the text of the license(s) in in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: Spec file is legible OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source 08beaf3fa95f16d8a2db2f7f3ea21196 OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK - MUST: No excludes needed FIX - MUST: Dependencies, add zlib to BuildRequires when you patch it to not use the one in the source OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros OK - MUST: The package contains code OK - MUST: No large documentation files for a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files in %doc don't affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives ( once zlib is gone ) OK - MUST: Console app, no .desktop needed OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK - MUST: All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: Builds in mock OK - SHOULD: The package compiles on all arch OK - SHOULD: Package runs as described So it still needs a little work. Action items: - Can you please check out the license and confirm that it is indeed artistic 2.0? - The one warning on rpmlint as mentioned before - You would have to take care of the zlib situation to get this to pass review Hope this helps! Once again, not a full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 02:14:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230214.m9N2EYHo027903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-22 22:14:33 EDT --- Hello Paulo, thanks for the practice review. If you wanna make it official, go ahead, I do not need a sponsor so any regular packager can do an official review. A note about the cflags. Please do take a closer look at the build output. The way I'm seeing it, the cflags are honored correctly: [athienem at localhost ladvd]$ rpmbuild -bc ladvd.spec > log 2>&1 [athienem at localhost ladvd]$ rpm --showrc | grep -i cflags optflags : %{__global_cflags} -m64 -mtune=generic CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS; -14: __global_cflags -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:-%optflags}" ; export CFLAGS ; -11: optflags %{__global_cflags} -m64 -mtune=generic [athienem at localhost ladvd]$ grep -c -- '-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4' log 10 [athienem at localhost ladvd]$ grep -- '-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4' log + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + CXXFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + FFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT main.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/main.Tpo" -c -o main.o main.c; \ if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT util.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/util.Tpo" -c -o util.o util.c; \ if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT sysinfo.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/sysinfo.Tpo" -c -o sysinfo.o sysinfo.c; \ if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT netif.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/netif.Tpo" -c -o netif.o netif.c; \ if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT cdp.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/cdp.Tpo" -c -o cdp.o cdp.c; \ if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -MT lldp.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/lldp.Tpo" -c -o lldp.o lldp.c; \ gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wall -o ladvd main.o util.o sysinfo.o netif.o cdp.o lldp.o -lcap [athienem at localhost ladvd]$ Just as a note for the next review: The trick here is that for most software using autotools (configure etc.), the cflags do not have to be specified during the make call as the environment variable was set during execution of the %configure macro and the fedora specific cflags were picked up on then. But thanks nevertheless for the quick review. regards, andreas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 03:07:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230307.m9N37198006095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|tibbs at math.uh.edu |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-22 23:07:00 EDT --- I just pushed ghc-6.8.3-9.fc10 to koji so this package review should be able to proceed from rawhide soon. Note that I added a new macro pkg_docdir so that should take care of tibbs' comment on hsc_name (I have been working to get rid of the latter macro). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 03:21:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230321.m9N3LUoP013224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 23:21:29 EDT --- Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody? Actually, I didn't even think you could set a ticket back to NEW after its been assigned; at least, the web interface won't let you. I wonder how that happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 03:29:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230329.m9N3TL9G014382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-22 23:29:20 EDT --- The specfile seems to still be 1.4, but I can pull it from the srpm. Is 1.6 an actual release? Because that doesn't seem to make sense when the only way to get it is to check it out of git. You need to provide instructions for actually checking the packaged version out of git, not just what's currently at the head of the tree. I know you probably depend on the names now, but is there really any point in postfixing the executable names with ".pl"? It's up to you, of course, and this wouldn't be the first package to do this, but I've never understood why anyone would care what language a particular executable is written in. I note this package provides perl(Satcon) = 1.3, which is... odd. The module version differs from the package version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 04:08:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230408.m9N48a7e016275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-23 00:08:34 EDT --- Well, one ticket at a time. And once this one is done, any packager can review any of those tickets. However, there are a few issues here: The tarball in the source tree differs from the tarball downloaded from the Source0 URL. In fact, the diff is almost 37000 lines long. Any idea what's going on? I don't understand why you explicitly %define version and release. If you just use: Version: 1.09.1 Release: 7 then %version and %release are defined for you in the same way that %name is. I would argue that according to the COPYING file, the License: should be "LGPLv2 with exceptions" but spot above says LGPLv2. I'll double check with spot tomorrow. I don't think its a blocker, but the first paragraph of %description is loaded with acronyms which are completely meaningless to most people. A little elaboration there would be welcome. Any reason why parallel make is not being used? You should use it if possible, but if it breaks you should include a comment to that effect. The AUTHORS, README and COPYING files are duplicated between the packages. There's no need to do that. X source files do not match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summaries are OK. * descriptions are OK (could perhaps use some elaboration of acronyms). * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: libmmdb-1.09.1-7.fc10.x86_64.rpm libmmdb.so.0()(64bit) libmmdb = 1.09.1-7.fc10 libmmdb(x86-64) = 1.09.1-7.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libmmdb.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libmmdb-devel-1.09.1-7.fc10.x86_64.rpm libmmdb-devel = 1.09.1-7.fc10 libmmdb-devel(x86-64) = 1.09.1-7.fc10 = libmmdb = 1.09.1-7.fc10 libmmdb.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig * %check is not present; no test suite upstream (that I could see). * shared libraries present: unversioned .so links are in the -devel package ldconfig called properly * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headersa re in the -devel package. * pkgconfig files in -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is present. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 04:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230447.m9N4llvq022026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 --- Comment #3 from Tuomas Mursu 2008-10-23 00:47:47 EDT --- Yeah I'm interested, just been kinda busy lately :) I'll upload fixed packages in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 05:20:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230520.m9N5KPO8027220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #61 from Paul Wise 2008-10-23 01:20:21 EDT --- New version released, please update. If there are any patches you need, please send them our way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 05:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230520.m9N5KZrN031950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #15 from Paul Wise 2008-10-23 01:20:34 EDT --- New version released, please update. If there are any patches you need, please send them our way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 05:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230545.m9N5jQoJ003143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-23 01:45:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mpfi Short Description: An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR Owners: konradm Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 05:55:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230555.m9N5tdYn004552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 01:55:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > ! For F-9 build > > - If you are using F-9 and you can rebuild your package on F-9, would you > > tell me if gnome-sharp is updated? > > I am using and can build on F9. The gnome-sharp package is an official package > (gnome-sharp-2.16.1-1.fc9.x86_64). Okay, then would you tell me what $ rpm -q gtk-sharp2 return? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 06:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230642.m9N6gHrW006440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 06:44:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230644.m9N6i3PQ006520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 02:44:02 EDT --- Okay One problem remains. i can't build the docs in the %build-Section, because the docs need the builded rabbyt to build.. :-/ this is a problem i can't fix.. SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt-0.8.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 06:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230647.m9N6lX7M011592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 02:47:31 EDT --- Okay, now bug 457926 is in good shape, I will approve this package. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (pystatgrab) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 06:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230654.m9N6sbpT012458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-23 02:54:36 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230704.m9N74FB3009568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:01:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230701.m9N716U9009261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-23 03:01:05 EDT --- Then I think this package is good :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:03:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230703.m9N73pBo014153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2008-10-23 03:03:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-GeneR Short Description: R for genes and sequences analysis Owners: pingou Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230705.m9N757dC014595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Balint Cristian changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:13:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230713.m9N7DToe015687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 03:13:27 EDT --- For -5svn: Almost okay. * Versioning of rpm - Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages The EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of this rpm should be 1.1-X.YYYsvn%{?dist}, for example, where X is fedora specific release number and YYY is the revision number of svn repository. * Macros in comments - For this package there is no problem, however please use %% (instead of single %) in comments or in %changelog to prevent macros from being expanded, like ----------------------------------------------------------- # %%{python_sitearch}/* ----------------------------------------------------------- (By the way I think this comment line and the above comment line can simply be removed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:31:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454851] Review Request: trainingchart : tool to download and log trainings from a garmin device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230731.m9N7VWKJ013900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454851 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-23 03:31:31 EDT --- Please add your request to the wishlist. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:51:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230751.m9N7p4Qb021079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-23 03:51:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I just pushed ghc-6.8.3-9.fc10 to koji Please ghc-6.8.3-10.fc10 with a fixed %cabal_configure for ghc-6.8.3. (In reply to comment #22) > Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody? Oops, sorry - no I didn't - I guess I already had the bug open in my browser. Jason, I didn't mean to steal the review from you, but I was planning on taking it since I am familiar with Haskell packaging and since no package review has yet been through the new haskell guidelines I might be better placed to do this one? But if you want to take it I won't stand in your way. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:54:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230754.m9N7siUe021597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-23 03:54:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321249) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321249) ghc-zlib.spec-1.patch A bit of cleanup/simplification and make it build with ghc-6.8.3 in current rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230752.m9N7qasj021369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 07:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230753.m9N7rNP6021455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 03:53:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > The RPM *does* definitely work for me. It installs an egg file instead of > sybasect.so. and Sybase.py. After reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs it seems that Fedora allows this case. Then * As dlopened module sybasect.so is in zipped egg file, debuginfo file is not created. Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons ------------------------------------------------------------------- use %define debug_package %{nil} in the specfile, and be sure to add a comment next to it explaining why it was done. ------------------------------------------------------------------- > I'm removing site.py, site.pyc, and site.pyo because these files already exist > (from python-setuptools). Okay. > I see what you mean about the .csvignore and pstumble, but I can't figure out > how to do anything about it. The %{_doc} directory in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT doesn't > exist yet in the %install section. %doc LICENCE ChangeLog doc examples installs these files. Just -------------------------------------------------------------------- %setup -q chmod 0644 doc/pstumble rm -f doc/.cvsignore -------------------------------------------------------------------- will suppress rpmlint error/warnings By the way I am also waiting for your another review request submission or a pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:03:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230803.m9N83Cvf019047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lemenkov at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2008-10-23 04:03:10 EDT --- I'm sorry, Rakesh, but I can't go further (at least until I'll find a box with F-10 installed). I'm releasing my fedora-review flags. If nobody will review this package, I'll restart the review process, but only after I'll update my working machine to F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230818.m9N8Ickd021730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-23 04:18:37 EDT --- No worries. I will wait for your update. In the meantime, if I can find someone then very good. I hope you will update your box soon. ;-) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:31:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230831.m9N8VsmP024452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-23 04:31:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Updated with SSL: > > http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec > http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm > > As far as the simpler spec in bug 467856, it looks like even though he included > neon-devel, it was still building against neon included in the source. > > My patch and other changes are specifically to get it to build against the > distro supplied neon. [cascavel:~/redhat/SOURCES/litmus-0.12] configure --help | grep neon --with-included-neon force use of included neon library --with-neon[=DIR] specify location of neon library It seems to me that the default is using an external neon ... configure --with-ssl=openssl .... configure: Configured to build litmus 0.12: Install prefix: /usr/local Compiler: gcc neon library: library in /usr (0.27.2) XML parser: using whatever neon uses SSL library: SSL is supported by neon Everything was detected correctly, on F8, without any patch. But ssl is not necessary, since neon provides it. make ...... gcc -o basic src/basic.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/copymove.c -o src/copymove.o gcc -o copymove src/copymove.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/props.c -o src/props.o gcc -o props src/props.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/locks.c -o src/locks.o gcc -o locks src/locks.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/http.c -o src/http.o gcc -o http src/http.o -L. -ltest -lneon Now run: make URL=http://dav.server/path/ check or make URL=http://dav.server/path/ CREDS="uname passwd" check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:55:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230855.m9N8tmAJ028402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #16 from Daniel Novotny 2008-10-23 04:55:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #11) > > I'm missing a trailing || : in the %pre client script: > > > > %pre client > > # when upgrading, move /etc/amandates to /var/lib/amanda/amandates > > [ -f /etc/amandates ] && > > mv /etc/amandates /var/lib/amanda/amandates || : > > This still needs to get fixed. I would, but ACLs prevent me. OK, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:52:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230852.m9N8qHoH032306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-23 04:52:15 EDT --- FAIL source files match upstream: can't download from svn without account OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field MIT matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. FAIL latest version is being packaged. can't say OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. tcl-zlib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation, but that's ok. No documentation at all provided. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. How can I check the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:54:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230854.m9N8segl032546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-23 04:54:39 EDT --- >Is 1.6 an actual release? Because that doesn't seem to make sense when the >only way to get it is to check it out of git. Yeah, perl-Satcon-1.6-1 is last release. See http://miroslav.suchy.cz/spacewalk/gitstat/tag.php for list of recent tags. >You need to provide instructions for actually checking the packaged version out >of git, not just what's currently at the head of the tree. I did. See this comment inside spec: # This src.rpm is cannonical upstream # You can obtain it using this set of commands # git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spacewalk.git/ # cd projects/perl-Satcon # make srpm The provided Makefile will checkout the git to the tag perl-Satcon-1.6-1 (commits after this tag are ignored) and make srpm from that version. > I know you probably depend on the names now, but is there really any point in > postfixing the executable names with ".pl"? You know... I did not write that code. I just take the code as is and try to include it in Fedora. The code is several years old. And yeah, several thing we are doing different today. But it works, and I'm trying to as little as possible, during review. > I note this package provides perl(Satcon) = 1.3, which is... odd. The module > version differs from the package version? Yeah there was hardcoded version in module. I removed it: Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon-1.7-1.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 08:57:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:57:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230857.m9N8vFKR028630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |opensp-1.5.2-9.fc10 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-23 04:57:14 EDT --- Fixed in opensp-1.5.2-9.fc10, I will ignore last remaining rpmlint warning about missing doc files in opensp-devel subpackage as the documentation is in main opensp package. Closing RAWHIDE, thanks again for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 09:36:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468155] New: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Summary: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/robodoc.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/robodoc-4.99.36-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: ROBODoc is a documentation tool (based on the AutoDocs program written a long time ago by Commodore). It extracts specially formated comment headers from the source file and puts them in a separate file. ROBODoc thus allows you to include the program documentation in the source code and avoid having to maintain two separate documents. ROBODoc can format the documentation in HTML, ASCII, AmigaGuide, LaTeX, or RTF format. It is even possible to include parts of the source code with function names that point their the documentation. It also can create index tables for all your variables, classes, functions, etc. The best feature of ROBODoc is that it works with many languages: Assembler, C, Perl, LISP, Occam, Tcl/Tk, Pascal, Fortran, shell scripts, and COBOL, basically any language that supports comments/remarks. rpmlint is silent. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=897383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 09:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230938.m9N9c2cw005387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 09:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810230938.m9N9cAn8009869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 10:12:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231012.m9NACDZS016522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 10:55:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 06:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231055.m9NAtLpn019460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-23 06:55:20 EDT --- >From now Solar artwork is dual licensed CC-BY-SA and GPLv2+. So we should dual license it too. Artwork as CC-BY-SA and code for themes as GPLv2+. I've just solved bug with repainting and colours for userlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 11:05:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231105.m9NB59Gu025944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 11:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231104.m9NB4Qro025557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-23 07:04:25 EDT --- RPM Lint: clean Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2+ or Ruby Actual License: LGPLv3 %doc License: LICENSE.txt Spec file language: ok Spec file readable:ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: cdeb6aeb70947e3f7149dfc1b4897c45) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10 ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok Fix the license tag please, otherwise this package is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 11:21:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231121.m9NBLMMe024028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-23 07:21:21 EDT --- RPM Lint: clean Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2+ or Ruby Actual License: Ruby (see http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt) %doc License: LICENSE.txt Spec file language: ok Spec file readable:ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: cdeb6aeb70947e3f7149dfc1b4897c45) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10 ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok Fix the license tag please, otherwise this package is ok. Spec file linked above does not match the spec used to build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 11:57:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 07:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231157.m9NBvtqp002817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Marc Bradshaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fedora at marcbradsh | |aw.co.uk) | --- Comment #10 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-10-23 07:57:54 EDT --- apologies, should be able to get something up this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 12:23:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231223.m9NCNpkj003610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-23 08:23:50 EDT --- Actually, he can't approve yet, as he's not sponsored himself, but once he is (as I am hoping to do), can can. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 12:29:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231229.m9NCTYtT004865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-23 08:29:33 EDT --- I suspected something as I didn't found him in FAS, thus the addition of "any regular packager". :-) So, thanks in advance for sponsoring him then... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 12:41:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231241.m9NCfQVf012123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 --- Comment #4 from Tuomas Mursu 2008-10-23 08:41:25 EDT --- Well well, it didn't take that long. I changed %prep too so that everything stays under one directory. Spec URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/1/gtk-aurora-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/1/gtk-aurora-engine-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 12:45:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231245.m9NCjrcn012905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-23 08:45:52 EDT --- build it, and in the pending queue and in the epel need-signing queue too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 12:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231257.m9NCvqsS015479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #6 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-23 08:57:51 EDT --- 1-4) patch applied, thanks 5) the gui does not start because of bug #467224 6) done 7) yes, it can run as regular user, e.g. to manage remote box over IP 8) fixed Look for OpenIPMI-2.0.14-5.fc10, available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=67224 or in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:08:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231308.m9ND8hTt017973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-23 09:08:41 EDT --- We now are at rc3 (no stable yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:15:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231315.m9NDFqY1019451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #16 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-23 09:15:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I would argue that according to the COPYING file, the License: should be > "LGPLv2 with exceptions" but spot above says LGPLv2. I'll double check with > spot tomorrow. Yeah, this is right, it should be "LGPLv2 with exceptions". Not sure why I thought differently before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:20:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231320.m9NDKZEE020489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #5 from John Anderson 2008-10-23 09:20:34 EDT --- My mistake, you're right. Removed patch. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231328.m9NDSiLK021943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-23 09:28:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-nws Short Description: R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:35:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:35:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231335.m9NDZYXq018291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-23 09:35:33 EDT --- Update for testing purposes only! Spec URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme-0.1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm DONE: - KDM theme (input backgrounds disappear a little later, bug?) - backgrounds - licenses TBD: - move fedora logo to fedora-logos, generic logo - default face icon (how-to link it?) - shared backgrounds for KDM, KSplash & Plasma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:32:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231332.m9NDW1Qo022811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 09:32:00 EDT --- Okay, thanks. Now closing. If you have some questions please feel free to mail to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 13:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231341.m9NDf9sQ019835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Moschny 2008-10-23 09:41:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > We now are at rc3 (no stable yet). I know, and I already did some more work on that package, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=895060 - however need to find out why it fails on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:23:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231423.m9NENtnr001532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Bug 454441 depends on bug 454439, which changed state. Bug 454439 Summary: Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:23:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231423.m9NENrW7001509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-23 10:23:53 EDT --- Built in rawhide, and updates are coming for F-8 and F-9. thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:32:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231432.m9NEWJYq003803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 10:32:18 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:32:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231432.m9NEWMra003836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 10:32:22 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] New: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Summary: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gratien.dhaese at it3.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.7-1.src.rpm Description: Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). It works out of the box and Fedora and RHEL releases (x86, x86_64 and ia64 tested). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:42:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231442.m9NEg38t001555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #1 from Gratien D'haese 2008-10-23 10:42:02 EDT --- Main web-site is http://rear.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:52:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231452.m9NEqYZp003747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-23 10:52:33 EDT --- Imported and built in devel. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:54:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231454.m9NEsrSS009042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 10:54:51 EDT --- Strangely enough, now it builds on F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898121 but not in F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898151 dist-f9-build jna is now jna-3.0.2-7.fc9, while this package requires: "BuildRequires: jna >= 3.0.3". So would you fix rpm versioning issue, commenting how to create tarball (as I noted on comment 17) and update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:53:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231453.m9NEr1fN008798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #9 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-23 10:53:01 EDT --- The conversion should not be done in %build because that will result it being done multiple times and thus in corrupted result when doing multiple successive --short-circuit builds. %prep would be the proper place to do it (I'll update rpmlint's message to reflect that). Also, there's little reason to convert HTML files that have the correct encoding in their meta info - HTML files are opened with browsers that should grok the encoding just fine. This is the reason why rpmlint does not complain about HTML (and some other) files' encodings even when they're not UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:06:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] New: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Summary: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: v4l2 is a control panel for video4linux2 devices, it reads a description of the controls that the V4L2 device supports from the device, and presents the user with a graphical means for adjusting those controls. It allows for controlling multiple devices. Controls can be updated with the device status either manually, or periodically and there is an easy way to reset one or all the controls to their default state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 14:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231457.m9NEvUIK009980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-23 10:57:29 EDT --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=897896 Looks real good here. I don't see any remaining blockers, wolfy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:23:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231523.m9NFN4IF009945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-23 11:23:03 EDT --- No blockers in a fast-forward review. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:31:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231531.m9NFV6x0011778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE |solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE |Theme |Theme Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-23 11:31:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: solar-kde-theme Short Description: Solar KDE theme Owners: jreznik,than,ltinkl,kkofler,rdieter Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:33:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231533.m9NFXTFY012106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley 2008-10-23 11:33:28 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. N/A - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: (include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =; rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and anything provided by glibc.) SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs N/A - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews) As noted on IRC, the category in the spec is a little off, but not a blocker. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:33:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231533.m9NFX2HP017105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-23 11:33:01 EDT --- New version with minor fixes: * Thu Oct 23 2008 Hans de Goede 1.2-2 - Fix the rpm group - Add a comment about the source of the icon we're using Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231538.m9NFcgCl018211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #16 from Robin Norwood 2008-10-23 11:38:41 EDT --- As far as item #2 in comment #14 goes, I think the standard practice for things like sample code is to make it non-executable and mark it as documentation. If you want to I can make this change for cerebroui when we resubmit cerebro. For item #3, yes, the license tag was set to GPLv3+ because of demjson.py - I think the license tag is correct. Since that file is GPLv3+, we can distribute cerebro as GPLv3+, but not as GPLv2+. The 'more restrictive' (GPLv3+) license wins. As a matter of clarity, the LICENSE file should probably be changed to match GPLv3+, but I don't think that's usually required to pass package review. I could be mistaken, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:45:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231545.m9NFjsUq014666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 11:45:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Strangely enough, now it builds on F-10: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898121 Oops!! the correct URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 15:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231556.m9NFuj7n016660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #5 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-23 11:56:44 EDT --- I'm being told to look at the patent CDDL FAQ: Q. What does the CDDL say about patents? The CDDL provides an explicit patent license for code released under the license. This means that you can use, modify, and redistribute code released under CDDL without worrying about any patents that the contributors of the code (including Sun) might have on the contributed technology. The license also includes a provision to discourage patent litigation against developers by revoking the rights to the code for anyone initiating a patent claim against a developer regarding code they have contributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:25:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231625.m9NGPmd5027191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-23 12:25:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: v4l2ucp Short Description: Video4linux universal control panel Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:26:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231626.m9NGQj1P022493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:29:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468222] New: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction-1.0-0.1.a1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python. It is mainly used by the ZODB, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231626.m9NGQPib022428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 12:26:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Okay, then would you tell me what > $ rpm -q gtk-sharp2 > return? Don't worry. Now F-9 buildroot is fixed by Xavier (bug 468055). Now: + This package itself is now okay + You seem to have chosen almost good package for your pre-review, however I will approve it. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (tasque) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). Removing NEEDSPONSOR. If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:32:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231632.m9NGWS1F023650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:35:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231635.m9NGZXIS024399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:35:32 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:32:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231632.m9NGWRLE023625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:35:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] New: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Summary: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery-0.9.1-0.1.dev20081021.fc9.src.rpm Description: ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:33:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468224] New: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-zope-sqlalchemy.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The aim of this package is to unify the plethora of existing packages integrating SQLAlchemy with Zope's transaction management. As such it seeks only to provide a data manager and makes no attempt to define a zopeish way to configure engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:31:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468223] New: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-tm2.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc9.src.rpm Description: The ZODB transaction manager is a completely generic transaction manager. It can be used independently of the actual "object database" part of ZODB. One of the purposes of creating repoze.tm was to allow for systems other than Zope to make use of two-phase commit transactions in a WSGI context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:35:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231635.m9NGZTnf029281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:35:28 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:35:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231635.m9NGZafI029338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231634.m9NGYg5N028852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-23 12:34:41 EDT --- Great, * But I was able to build the docs when I moved the line cd docs; PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} %{__python} make_docs.py;cd .. to right after the "setup.py build" in the %build section. What was wrong in your case? * When you are commenting out a line that has a macro make sure you use %% instead of a single %, so that the macro doesn't expand out. (e.g. in the %check section) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231640.m9NGeS4Y026444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-23 12:40:27 EDT --- @Robin You are correct, regarding license. - Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231636.m9NGaZgO024938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:36:34 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:37:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231637.m9NGb2Vs025131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:37:01 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:37:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231637.m9NGbNiP025215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:37:22 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231641.m9NGfw3c027526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2008-10-23 12:41:57 EDT --- Note: this package is only needed on EL-4 and EL-5, as the 'wsgiref' module is now in the Python 2.5 stdlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231641.m9NGfZM2031932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:41:34 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:40:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231640.m9NGeQoX031638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:40:25 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:37:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231637.m9NGbbEU030212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:37:36 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:41:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231641.m9NGflEv032008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 12:41:46 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-Daemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:40:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] New: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-1.el5.noarch.rpm Description: WebError is WSGI middleware that performs error handling and exception catching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468228] New: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Summary: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-ext-repoze-who.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-ext-repoze-who-0.1-0.1.r26.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sample repoze.who middleware config and plugins for TG2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-1.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: repoze.who is an identification and authentication framework for arbitrary WSGI applications. It acts as WSGI middleware. repoze.who is inspired by Zope 2's Pluggable Authentication Service (PAS) (but repoze.who is not dependent on Zope in any way; it is useful for any WSGI application). It provides no facility for authorization (ensuring whether a user can or cannot perform the operation implied by the request). This is considered to be the domain of the WSGI application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] New: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-1.9.7-0.1.a5dev.5564.fc9.src.rpm Description: TurboGears2, provides a comprehensive web development toolkit. It is designed to help you create the basic outline of a database-driven web application in minutes. TurboGears provides you with sane default for designer friendly templates, tools to make AJAX, and dynamic Javascript driven pages easy on both the browser side and the server side. TurboGears is a project that is built upon a foundation of reuse and building up. In retrospect, much of the code that was home grown in the TurboGears project should have been released as independent projects that integrate with TurboGears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231649.m9NGnxpv001272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231650.m9NGo2lA001634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:50:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231650.m9NGo1Dr001315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:50:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231650.m9NGo2ZN001373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:50:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231650.m9NGo0ln001293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:49:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231649.m9NGnxFC001248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468223, 468222, 468224, | |468228, 468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:51:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:51:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231651.m9NGppVT029516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231651.m9NGpqRf029541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231652.m9NGqKjo029608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-23 12:52:19 EDT --- here is the latest'n'greatest version: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SPECS/gstreamer-java.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SRPMS/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.1.20081023hg.fc9.src.rpm here are the successful builds: f-10, f-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898288 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231654.m9NGsWpo002374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:53:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231653.m9NGrHNs002246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231654.m9NGsXYF002398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:54:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231654.m9NGsVI9002350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|468222, 468227 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:53:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231653.m9NGrGmm002221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 16:56:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231656.m9NGuXUc030491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #21 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-23 12:56:32 EDT --- opps it seems we do paralell build. i still don't know why not build on f-9. it's build on my f-9:-( alhough i already install jna from koji. and i also request newer jna for everything: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231700.m9NH0srI031453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #17 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-23 13:00:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > > The tarball in the source tree differs from the tarball downloaded from the > Source0 URL. In fact, the diff is almost 37000 lines long. Any idea what's > going on? > Oops - I had used a .tar.gz I created from a "make build" of the original package. Fixed. > I don't understand why you explicitly %define version and release. If you just > use: > Version: 1.09.1 > Release: 7 > then %version and %release are defined for you in the same way that %name is. > Removed. > I would argue that according to the COPYING file, the License: should be > "LGPLv2 with exceptions" but spot above says LGPLv2. I'll double check with > spot tomorrow. > Fixed. > I don't think its a blocker, but the first paragraph of %description is loaded > with acronyms which are completely meaningless to most people. A little > elaboration there would be welcome. > Sorry, alot of the stuff in the spec is cruft from the original author. Rewritten. > Any reason why parallel make is not being used? You should use it if possible, > but if it breaks you should include a comment to that effect. > It simply wasn't present before. It seems to work OK, included now. > The AUTHORS, README and COPYING files are duplicated between the packages. > There's no need to do that. > Fixed. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb-1.09.1-8.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:15:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231715.m9NHFpEx001587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #22 from Michael Schwendt 2008-10-23 13:15:49 EDT --- I dunno whether I'm registered there. It's beyond my time to file a bug in that tracker. And indeed the code suffers from other buffer overflows caused by the same programming mistake: http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=413085&aid=311178&group_id=100070 Meanwhile 2.2 is the latest release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:16:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231716.m9NHGKYK001717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #30 from David Kaylor 2008-10-23 13:16:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > > (In reply to comment #26) > > > ! For F-9 build > > > - If you are using F-9 and you can rebuild your package on F-9, would you > > > tell me if gnome-sharp is updated? > > > > I am using and can build on F9. The gnome-sharp package is an official package > > (gnome-sharp-2.16.1-1.fc9.x86_64). > > Okay, then would you tell me what > $ rpm -q gtk-sharp2 > return? gtk-sharp2-2.10.3-3.fc9.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:25:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231725.m9NHP6FI003150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 13:25:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > opps it seems we do paralell build. i still don't know why not build on f-9. > it's build on my f-9:-( alhough i already install jna from koji. and i also > request newer jna for everything: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467029 Because I guess jna maintainer has not submitted a request to push F-9 rebuit jna to repository nor asked rel-eng team to make rebuilt package added to buildroot.... By the way: (In reply to comment #20) > http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SRPMS/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.1.20081023hg.fc9.src.rpm Does this mean that this is a pre-version of 0.9? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:31:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231731.m9NHVNIh009516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231731.m9NHV2Z7004330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:31:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231731.m9NHVECb004367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 13:31:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > > Okay, then would you tell me what > > $ rpm -q gtk-sharp2 > > return? > > gtk-sharp2-2.10.3-3.fc9.x86_64 Thanks. Actually dist-f9-build uses gtk-sharp2-2.12.1-1.fc9, which were causing dependency problem on dist-f9-build, now fixed by gnome-sharp maintainer (bug 468055). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231731.m9NHVjQg004479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-23 13:31:44 EDT --- Some Comments: Good: + Local build works fine + Blender scripts are in the right directory: Bad: - Build failed on koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898469 Reason: Wrong BR to libxml-devel, You will need a BR to libxml2-devel. - Rpmlint complaints source rpm $ rpmlint -i yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm yafaray.src:43: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep # fixes %{buildroot} in libyafaraycore.so $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will break short circuiting. - Rpmlint warning to yafaray binary rpm: $ rpmlint -i yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc9.x86_64.rpm yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - Rpmlint complaints yafary-blender rpm: $ rpmlint -i yafaray-blender-0.1.0-4.fc9.x86_64.rpm yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py "BPY" This script uses an incorrect interpreter. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py "BPY" This script uses an incorrect interpreter. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py "BPY" This script uses an incorrect interpreter. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafrayinterface.so This package installs an ELF binary in the /usr/share hierarchy, which is reserved for architecture-independent files. yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafqt.so This package installs an ELF binary in the /usr/share hierarchy, which is reserved for architecture-independent files. - Source contains not full qualified URI. If you have got the sources from svn, please add a comment on top of the source Statement. Please specified the release wihich you have chechout from svn. - %{datadir}/blender/scripts is owned by the blender package. Questions: * Why do you have the sub packages yarafay and yarafay-blender? * Why did you have uncomment the Provides and Obsoletes Statements? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:41:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231741.m9NHfHho006678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 13:41:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Great, > * But I was able to build the docs when I moved the line > cd docs; PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} %{__python} make_docs.py;cd > .. > to right after the "setup.py build" in the %build section. What was wrong in > your case? really? just by moving the lines? My problem was and is: It can't find the pythonmodule "rabbyt" in the %{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} because it was not installed. I already had this problem before, so i left the docs out. i only found the ugly method to build it in install-section, after the rabbytegg was installed, because it could not found it before. Your hint fails in my build :-( if you was able to do it, you did more than just moving the lines... > * When you are commenting out a line that has a macro make sure you use %% > instead of a single %, so that the macro doesn't expand out. (e.g. in the > %check section) I'm going to remember this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 17:42:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 171993] Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231742.m9NHg2ol012235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 --- Comment #83 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-23 13:41:55 EDT --- Is anyone actually reviewing this ticket? When Ed stopped reviewing it I had cleared the flag but for some reason people kept setting it to other random values. Six months ago Orion indicated that the package is under review again but didn't assign the ticket to himself so honestly I can't figure out what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:00:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231800.m9NI0Nw7010745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #23 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-23 14:00:22 EDT --- 2.2? Ok, let it be 2.2. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898668 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:00:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231800.m9NI0ItQ010690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-23 14:00:16 EDT --- OK, my bad. The package is good to go. There's no easy way of building the docs other than in the install section. Put a comment in the spec file about this before you commit. ------------------------------------------------ This package (python-rabbyt) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:06:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231806.m9NI6ZPg017602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 14:06:33 EDT --- Some notes: * License - License tag should be "GPLv2+". * Redundant BuildRequires - Please try to remove redundant BuildRequires * gtk2-devel is required by libglade2-devel * glib2-devel is required by gtk2-devel * avahi-devel is required by avahi-glib-devel * libglade2-devel is required by libgnomeui-devel and libgnomeui-devel is required by libgnomedb-devel * perl module dependency - For rpms providing perl module virtual Provides, please use perl module names for (Build)Requires, not using rpm names directly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides In this case "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" must be used. * Unneeded Requires: - "Requires: gtk2" and so on must all be removed. rpmbuild checks the dependencies related to libraries automatically and adds them to the rebuilt binary rpms: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires * Timestamps - To keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible, please consider to use: -------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" -------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * desktop file install - When desktop file is to be installed, desktop-file-{install,validate} must be used: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage ! By the way for Icon entry "Icon=ario" is preferred: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Icon_tag_in_Desktop_Files * %find_lang - gettext .mo files must be handled by %find_lang: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files * Static archives - static archives *.a files are not needed for this package and must be removed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries * Documents - Usually "INSTALL" file is for people who want to compile and install a package by themselves and is not needed for people using rpm. - There is no need to ship zero-size "README" file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231808.m9NI8n48012350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 14:08:48 EDT --- CLOSED * last open source version * just compatible with python-rabbyt 0.8.1 or 0.8.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:23:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231823.m9NINwJE015444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 14:23:56 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 462250) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:22:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231822.m9NIMlE5015210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 14:22:46 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 462250) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231825.m9NIP0Ht015553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 14:24:59 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 462250) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:22:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231822.m9NIMnk6015257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #12 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-23 14:22:48 EDT --- Thanks. I should have thought of %setup. I put together a -5 release w/ the requested changes. SPEC: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase.spec SRPM: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-5.src.rpm I'll put in another review request when I come across something else in need of packaging (is there a list of requests somewhere?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:31:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231831.m9NIV2v5017310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 14:31:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > SPEC: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase.spec > SRPM: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-5.src.rpm - I will check this later (I will go to bed) > I'll put in another review request when I come across something else in need of > packaging (is there a list of requests somewhere?) - If you are interested, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblog - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231835.m9NIZrVG022984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 14:35:52 EDT --- purple-microblog-0.1.2-2.20081023svn165.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/purple-microblog-0.1.2-2.20081023svn165.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 18:34:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461678] Review Request: purple-microblog - Libpurple plug-in supporting microblog services like Twitter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231834.m9NIYAmb022504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461678 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 14:34:09 EDT --- purple-microblog-0.1.2-2.20081023svn165.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/purple-microblog-0.1.2-2.20081023svn165.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 19:15:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231915.m9NJFhqa031614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler 2008-10-23 15:15:42 EDT --- > - default face icon (how-to link it?) That's kdebase-workspace's job. I will update kdebase-workspace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 19:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231931.m9NJVtVZ030203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at w3sp.de Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 15:31:54 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt-0.8.2-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 19:46:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:46:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231946.m9NJkjTL005370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Stone 2008-10-23 15:46:44 EDT --- ==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ==== X rpmlint output: php-pear-Auth-radius.noarch: W: no-documentation php-pear-Auth.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4, tab: line 12) php-pear-Auth-samba.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Please remove all tabs from the spec file. - package named according to package naming guidelines - spec file name matches %[name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed under an approved fedora license - %license matches actual license X license file not included in %doc - spec file written in American English - spec file legible - sources match upstream 8d482ac5b07ed74ab8f29430063c6bae Auth-1.6.1.tgz 8d482ac5b07ed74ab8f29430063c6bae ../SOURCES/Auth-1.6.1.tgz - SRPM compiles on x86_64 F-9 - all build dependencies listed in BR - no locales - no shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicate files in %files - file permissions set properly - contains a proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - contains code or permissible content - no large documentation - no header files - no static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no .so files - subpackages properly require parent package - no libtool archives - not a GUI application - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages - buildroot removed in %install - all files valid utf-8 *** APPROVED *** ==== MUST FIX ==== - No items ==== SHOULD FIX ==== - Remove tabs from spec file - Add a copy of the PHP license to %doc (see spec file for php-pear-File for an example) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 19:47:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231947.m9NJl1Tn000387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 19:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810231959.m9NJxSti007741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 15:59:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:00:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232000.m9NK0uEl008312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-23 16:00:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The provided Makefile will checkout the git to the tag perl-Satcon-1.6-1 > (commits after this tag are ignored) and make srpm from that version. No, it will checkout whatever git tag the makefile in git head happens to specify. If six months from now, it is altered to check out version 2.0 then those instructions will no longer be correct. In fact, didn't you just alter it to check out 1.7? How would I now check out 1.6? > You know... I did not write that code. I just take the code as is and try to > include it in Fedora. The code is several years old. Well, it is my job as the reviewer to ask those questions. It's OK if the names need to be that way because they've been that way for ages and other software expects them. > Yeah there was hardcoded version in module. I removed it: It is normal for Perl modules to indicate their versions, but I don't see any problem if you don't want to do that, although you then cannot have version-specific "use" statements in code which uses this module (and hence no automatic version-specific rpm dependency generation). I doubt that would make any difference to your application, though. I will finish up this review when I get home. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232005.m9NK5mcY004317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:05:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:01:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232001.m9NK1UDI003427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:01:29 EDT --- Please add a cvs admin request with template. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:02:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232002.m9NK2jU1008690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:02:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:09:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232009.m9NK9Kfh004834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #23 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-23 16:09:19 EDT --- that's why i said i've to wait for the next jna update (and libffi on epel). no there is no currently 1.0 prebuild, but may be there will be some pre 1.0 that's why i renumber it to 0.9 (since wayne said the next will be 1.0) so this hg version won't be in conflict with any future version even there will be a 0.9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:11:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232011.m9NKB1lh010569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:11:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:09:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232009.m9NK9vPg010160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:09:56 EDT --- Thanks for looking into it. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:12:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232012.m9NKCmo6005613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #17 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 16:12:47 EDT --- Package Name: python-rabbyt Short Description: sprite library for Python with game development in mind Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:16:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232016.m9NKG5L5006322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at all-the-johnsons.co.uk Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:16:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232017.m9NKH3ig011759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-23 16:17:02 EDT --- Comparing with openSUSE, they use a shared cim-schema package, which is the MOFs from http://www.dmtf.org/standards/cim/cim_schema_v2191, instead of using the copy of the MOFs included in the sfcb package. Could/should we do that too? I would expect so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232016.m9NKGtNB011724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-23 16:16:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Some Comments: > > Good: > > + Local build works fine > + Blender scripts are in the right directory: > > Bad: > > - Build failed on koji > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898469 > > Reason: Wrong BR to libxml-devel, You will need a BR to libxml2-devel. Fixed in the new .src.rpm version. Please, see link at the end. > > - Rpmlint complaints source rpm > > $ rpmlint -i yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm > yafaray.src:43: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep # fixes %{buildroot} in > libyafaraycore.so > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be touched during %build or %prep stage, as it will > break short circuiting. > It was just a comment. I am using %%{buildroot} now. > - Rpmlint warning to yafaray binary rpm: > $ rpmlint -i yafaray-0.1.0-4.fc9.x86_64.rpm > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. > This is an upstream issue. They are not using sonames. > - Rpmlint complaints yafary-blender rpm: > $ rpmlint -i yafaray-blender-0.1.0-4.fc9.x86_64.rpm > yafaray-blender.x86_64: W: no-documentation > The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include > documentation files. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py "BPY" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py 0644 > This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for > executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If > the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, > otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py "BPY" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py 0644 > This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for > executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If > the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, > otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py "BPY" > This script uses an incorrect interpreter. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py 0644 > This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for > executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If > the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, > otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafrayinterface.so > This package installs an ELF binary in the /usr/share hierarchy, which is > reserved for architecture-independent files. > > yafaray-blender.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share > /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafqt.so > This package installs an ELF binary in the /usr/share hierarchy, which is > reserved for architecture-independent files. All the other blender scripts (in /usr/share/blender/scripts) are this way. > > - Source contains not full qualified URI. > If you have got the sources from svn, please add a comment on top of the > source Statement. Please specified the release wihich you have chechout > from svn. > The comments are in the changelog section, including the version (286). > - %{datadir}/blender/scripts is owned by the blender package. These scripts are just for the integration between blender and yafaray. > > Questions: > * Why do you have the sub packages yarafay and yarafay-blender? yafaray-blender contains scripts to allow blender to use yafaray. They should disappear in the future when yafaray replace yafray. For now, both renderers (yafray and yafaray) can coexist, and be called trough different menu options. In the yafaray home page, these scripts are supplied as a zip file for ubuntu. http://www.yafray.org/downloads/yaf_blender_282_amd64.zip > * Why did you have uncomment the Provides and Obsoletes Statements? The statements are commented, because we do not want to eliminate yafray right now. UPDATED VERSIONS: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:25:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232025.m9NKP0SW007745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #18 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-23 16:24:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-rabbyt Short Description: sprite library for Python with game development in mind Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:21:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:21:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232021.m9NKLXRf007402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Toshio Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkuratom at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Toshio Kuratomi 2008-10-23 16:21:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:25:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] New: Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Summary: Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkearney at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-turtleart.spec SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-turtleart-13-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Turtleart activity for the sugar desktop Clean builds in koji rpmlint reports warning for Sugar Activity as a group I am submitting patches and permission changes to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:30:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232030.m9NKUAfe014385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:30:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:28:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232028.m9NKS7El013931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:28:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:27:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232027.m9NKRwTx013886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #7 from Emily Ratliff 2008-10-23 16:27:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review Matt. An updated sblim-sfcb.spec file should go up on SF shortly. It should address all of your comments other than the location of the libraries which I am still working on and the comments about the schema package, both previous comments and the one today. I really don't have a strong opinion on how the schema should be handled. I did notice the openSUSE approach which seems reasonable, but as a first pass I went with the upstream approach. If you think a separate schema package is the right way to go, then I'll change this spec file to omit the schema subpackage. Emily -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:32:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 291191] Review Request: xgrep - A grep-like utility for XML files. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232032.m9NKWoFo009592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=291191 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:32:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:31:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467943] Review Request: solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE Theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232031.m9NKVmOD009424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:31:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:36:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232036.m9NKaguO015627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 20:36:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462250] Review Request: python-pmw - python megawidgets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232036.m9NKaeAp015607@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462250 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-23 16:36:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:23:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468285] New: Review Request: gobject-introspection Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gobject-introspection https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Summary: Review Request: gobject-introspection Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, otaylor at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM: http://cdn.verbum.org/gobject-introspection-0.5.0-1.svn20081023.r801.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://cdn.verbum.org/gobject-introspection.spec %description GObject Introspection can scan C header and source files in order to generate metadata "typelib" files. It also provides an API to examine typelib files, useful for creating language bindings among other things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:22:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232122.m9NLMx8B023750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-23 17:22:57 EDT --- Yes, I hadn't realized the sfcb Makefile was using curl to download the latest schema from the web site at buildtime. This is not permissible; packages may not access network resources at buildtime. I've taken the openSUSE copy of cim-schema and cleaned it up to meet Fedora packaging guidelines. I'll open a new review ticket for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:30:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] New: Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Summary: Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema-2.19.1-1.src.rpm Description: Common Information Model (CIM) is a model for describing overall management information in a network or enterprise environment. CIM consists of a specification and a schema. The specification defines the details for integration with other management models. The schema provides the actual model descriptions. needed by sblim-sfcb and other sblim-* providers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:31:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232131.m9NLVQmg025350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emilyr at us.ibm.com, | |srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com Blocks| |446183 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:33:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232133.m9NLXPTd020526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 --- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-23 17:33:25 EDT --- Package review #468287 cim-schema now blocks this package, so we can avoid needing network connectivity at buildtime. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:31:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232131.m9NLVwob020423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232131.m9NLVun5020378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|446183 |466183 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:41:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452453] Review Request: perl-Crypt-RIPEMD160 - Perl extension for the RIPEMD-160 Hash function In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232141.m9NLfRfx026957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452453 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 21:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454687] Review Request: perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl extension for the clamav virus scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232143.m9NLhEFf022273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454687 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-23 17:43:12 EDT --- Well, its been three more weeks. I guess I'll close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 22:04:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232204.m9NM46X3025657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:R-GeneR - R |Review Request: R-GeneR - R |for genes and sequences |for genes and sequences |analysis |analysis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] New: Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Summary: Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://pyglet.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: roma at lcg.ufrj.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, limb at jcomserv.net, kwizart at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/python-pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/python-pyglet-1.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm Pyglet provides an object-oriented programming interface for developing games and other visually-rich applications for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:22:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] New: Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Summary: Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jabberpy.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jabberpy-0.5-0.15.fc9.src.rpm Description: jabber.py is a Python module for the jabber instant messaging protocol. jabber.py deals with the xml parsing and socket code, leaving the programmer to concentrate on developing quality jabber based applications with Python. This is part of the client-side spacewalk tools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:26:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:26:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466688] Review Request: mpfi - An interval arithmetic library based on MPFR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232326.m9NNQ00g010815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466688 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #18 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-23 19:25:59 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:31:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232331.m9NNVr84011898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 19:31:53 EDT --- openalchemist-0.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openalchemist-0.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:31:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232331.m9NNVnGP011863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 19:31:48 EDT --- openalchemist-0.3-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openalchemist-0.3-4.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 23 23:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810232336.m9NNabOR007389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-23 19:36:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Questions: > * Why do you have the sub packages yarafay and yarafay-blender? > * Why did you have uncomment the Provides and Obsoletes Statements? Good questions. I answear the second one first: Because yafray and yafaray can co-exist. (until the contrary is proven - but there is no namespace conflict yet). Do yafaray can work with another modeler than blender ? Actually I guess it can, I think it should even be possible to run it without blender or even without Xorg installed. This minimal yafaray (-core ?) would be composed of %{_bindir}yafaray-xml and %{_libdir}/libyafaraycore.so along with %{_libdir}/libyafaray/ Now about %{_libdir}/libyafarayplugin.so, I guess it is the interface with blender that is meant to be dlopened somehow. But it can stay with the -core sub-package according to the library requirements it has. About %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so ? It can probably go to the main package. But as there is no more binary to run the qt interface I guess it is used by the blender plugin (it failed while testing with blender, so it is just guesses). So the main package needs to require the core sub-package and blender, along with provides the scripts and .so . It will ends to have: %files %defattr(-, root, root) %doc CODING LICENSE INSTALL %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so %{_datadir}/blender/scripts #And to fix the arch dependant file %{_libdir}/blender/yafaray/ #or what will be needed %files core %defattr(-, root, root) %{_bindir}/%{name}-xml %{_libdir}/libyafaraycore.so %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so / Few others notes / * License is LGPLv2+ According to headers of the sources. "...either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." * Developer file in Binrary package: (it should be removed) /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct * Rpmlint output on installed package. ----- [root at kwizatz sequence]# rpmlint yafaray yafaray.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-5 0.1.0-5.fc8.kwizart yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /lib64/libm.so.6 yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/libIex.so.6 yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/libImath.so.6 yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /lib64/libz.so.1 yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /lib64/libdl.so.2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. ------------------ unused-direct-shlib-dependency should be reported upstream. no-soname could be also be reported upstreal, even if the libraries are meant to be dlopened. (as it is the case for yafray). * gcc-c++ is already in the default buildroot. It shouldn't be specified. * Compilation must use our CFLAGS. The package is compiled with -O3, But instead it should use our $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. * Testing yafaray with blender failed. Or at least i didn't get how to make it work. (both package are installed) [kwizart at kwizatz ~]$ blender Compiled with Python version 2.5.1. Checking for installed Python... got it! Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 25, in File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py", line 35, in import yafrayinterface File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/yafrayinterface.py", line 7, in import _yafrayinterface ImportError: No module named _yafrayinterface So for now, I don't know how to make it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 00:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240034.m9O0YJi5015718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 David Kaylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 00:33:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240033.m9O0XZ46021108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #32 from David Kaylor 2008-10-23 20:33:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tasque Short Description: A simple task management app (TODO list) for the Linux Desktop Owners: dkaylor Branches: f-9 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 00:37:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240037.m9O0bMvf016469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #33 from David Kaylor 2008-10-23 20:37:21 EDT --- > Now: > + This package itself is now okay > + You seem to have chosen almost good package for your pre-review, however > I will approve it. > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > This package (tasque) is APPROVED by mtasaka > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Please follow the procedure written on: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". > > Now I am sponsoring you. > > If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have > to look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT > (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). > > > Removing NEEDSPONSOR. > > If you have questions, please ask me. Thanks. I just did a Koji build & submitted my CVS request. For now, I listed only f-9 but maybe I should have included f-10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 00:39:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 20:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240039.m9O0dqtb016704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-23 20:39:50 EDT --- Spot, I expect this is an OK license (please suggest license tag text), but would appreciate your review. // Copyright 1998-2008 Distributed Management Task Force, Inc. (DMTF). // All rights reserved. // DMTF is a not-for-profit association of industry members dedicated // to promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability. // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members, // provided that correct attribution is given. // As DMTF specifications may be revised from time to time, // the particular version and release date should always be noted. // // Implementation of certain elements of this standard or proposed // standard may be subject to third party patent rights, including // provisional patent rights (herein "patent rights"). DMTF makes // no representations to users of the standard as to the existence // of such rights, and is not responsible to recognize, disclose, or // identify any or all such third party patent right, owners or // claimants, nor for any incomplete or inaccurate identification or // disclosure of such rights, owners or claimants. DMTF shall have no // liability to any party, in any manner or circumstance, under any // legal theory whatsoever, for failure to recognize, disclose, or // identify any such third party patent rights, or for such party's // reliance on the standard or incorporation thereof in its product, // protocols or testing procedures. DMTF shall have no liability to // any party implementing such standard, whether such implementation // is foreseeable or not, nor to any patent owner or claimant, and shall // have no liability or responsibility for costs or losses incurred if // a standard is withdrawn or modified after publication, and shall be // indemnified and held harmless by any party implementing the // standard from any and all claims of infringement by a patent owner // for such implementations. // // For information about patents held by third-parties which have // notified the DMTF that, in their opinion, such patent may relate to // or impact implementations of DMTF standards, visit // http://www.dmtf.org/about/policies/disclosures.php. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 01:31:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240131.m9O1VlJm030208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-23 21:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Questions: > > * Why do you have the sub packages yarafay and yarafay-blender? > > * Why did you have uncomment the Provides and Obsoletes Statements? > Good questions. > I answear the second one first: > Because yafray and yafaray can co-exist. (until the contrary is proven - but > there is no namespace conflict yet). > > Do yafaray can work with another modeler than blender ? > Actually I guess it can, I think it should even be possible to run it without > blender or even without Xorg installed. > This minimal yafaray (-core ?) would be composed of %{_bindir}yafaray-xml and > %{_libdir}/libyafaraycore.so along with %{_libdir}/libyafaray/ I downloaded this xml file from an yafaray forum: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yaf.xml Running /usr/bin/yafaray-xml yaf.xml produces a file containing an image: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.tga It is a silly image (just white, grey and black), but exactly the same that was published on the forum. > Now about %{_libdir}/libyafarayplugin.so, I guess it is the interface with > blender that is meant to be dlopened somehow. But it can stay with the -core > sub-package according to the library requirements it has. > About %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so ? It can probably go to the main package. But > as there is no more binary to run the qt interface I guess it is used by the > blender plugin (it failed while testing with blender, so it is just guesses). > So the main package needs to require the core sub-package and blender, along > with provides the scripts and .so . > > It will ends to have: > %files > %defattr(-, root, root) > %doc CODING LICENSE INSTALL > %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so > %{_datadir}/blender/scripts > #And to fix the arch dependant file > %{_libdir}/blender/yafaray/ #or what will be needed > > %files core > %defattr(-, root, root) > %{_bindir}/%{name}-xml > %{_libdir}/libyafaraycore.so > %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so > %dir %{_libdir}/%{name} > %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so > > > / Few others notes / > > * License is LGPLv2+ > According to headers of the sources. "...either version 2.1 of the License, or > (at your option) any later version." > * Developer file in Binrary package: (it should be removed) > /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct > * Rpmlint output on installed package. > ----- > [root at kwizatz sequence]# rpmlint yafaray > yafaray.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-5 0.1.0-5.fc8.kwizart > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so > yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so > /lib64/libm.so.6 > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so > yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so > /usr/lib64/libIex.so.6 > yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so > /usr/lib64/libImath.so.6 > yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so > /lib64/libz.so.1 > yafaray.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so > yafaray.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /lib64/libdl.so.2 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. > ------------------ > unused-direct-shlib-dependency should be reported upstream. > no-soname could be also be reported upstreal, even if the libraries are meant > to be dlopened. (as it is the case for yafray). > > * gcc-c++ is already in the default buildroot. > It shouldn't be specified. > > * Compilation must use our CFLAGS. > The package is compiled with -O3, But instead it should use our > $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. > > * Testing yafaray with blender failed. > Or at least i didn't get how to make it work. (both package are installed) > [kwizart at kwizatz ~]$ blender > Compiled with Python version 2.5.1. > Checking for installed Python... got it! > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 25, in > File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py", line 35, in > import yafrayinterface > File "/usr/share/blender/scripts/yafrayinterface.py", line 7, in > import _yafrayinterface > ImportError: No module named _yafrayinterface > > So for now, I don't know how to make it works. I can run blender 2.48 on F8 x86_64, and access yafaray. I compiled blender myself, mainly because I want ffmpeg enabled, to create some avi files with video animations: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/blender-2.48-15.fc8.src.rpm I think the minimum blender version that works with yafaray is 2.47. You can see how to call yafaray render, through the menus, here: http://www.yafray.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1701 I can change yafaray spec file, but It would be nice if people could get yafaray running the way I described... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 02:04:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240204.m9O24qtS030893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chris.stone at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 02:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240204.m9O24FsM030791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-23 22:04:14 EDT --- Thanks - Will fix all "should points" before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Auth Short Description: provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 03:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240314.m9O3EmLP010920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-23 23:14:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > Thanks. I just did a Koji build & submitted my CVS request. For now, I listed > only f-9 but maybe I should have included f-10? F-10 branch is also created as "devel" directory in this case so don't worry (unless you need early branching). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 05:16:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240516.m9O5GS5x002197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 --- Comment #1 from Kushal Das 2008-10-24 01:16:27 EDT --- Automated result from review-o-matic http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=900239 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 05:26:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240526.m9O5QYEb030979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 01:26:33 EDT --- xx - package does not meet Packaging Guidelines + Instead of just replacing -03 with -02 in the Makefile, you should try to use the value of RPM_OPT_FLAGS or %{optflags} as CFLAGS. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags In this case, you could use: make CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS It has a hand coded Makefile with hard written CFLAGS so replacing seems to me okay + According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps you should use 'install -p'. Done + You could consider adding CHANGES to %doc as it gives an indication of the direction the project is taking. Done xx - ExcludeArch is needed The upstream page (http://code.google.com/p/bunny-the-fuzzer/) says: "Bunny is currently known to support Linux, ... on IA32 and IA64 systems." One should note that IA64 is different from x86_64 or amd64. So it would be a good idea to cross-check whether IA64 has been mistakenly used to refer to x86_64 or amd64, and whether x86_64 or amd64 is supported or not. I think that x86_64 is supported since it seemed to work with gcc.x86_64. In case IA64 has been mistakenly used, we should ExcludeArch ia64, alongwith the other secondary architectures (ie., alpha, arm, s390, sparc) which might not be supported. >From http://code.google.com/p/bunny-the-fuzzer/wiki/BunnyDoc """The only platforms known to work fine are Linux, flavors of BSD, and Cygwin on IA32 platforms. Support for 64-bit and other unix systems is not confirmed. There is no support for non-x86 architectures, although this requires very few tweaks to correct. """ so ia32 it works. ia64 and other non-x86 need to be excluded. Done http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/bunny-0.93-2.fc10.src.rpm -> SRPM http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/bunny.spec -> SPEC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 05:28:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240528.m9O5SX6Q003694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 01:28:33 EDT --- pystatgrab is approved. So, I will start the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 05:48:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 01:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] New: Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Summary: Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch at dell.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/sblim/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/sblim/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-134.src.rpm Description: This package contains a developer library for helping out when writing CMPI providers. This library polls the registered functions for data and, if it changes, a CMPI indication is set with the values of the indication class properties (also set by the developer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 06:02:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240602.m9O62YDl008600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 02:02:33 EDT --- >It has a hand coded Makefile with hard written CFLAGS so replacing seems to me >okay Fixed. It highlights the whole messy code written. I will notify upstream about it. Moved ia64 to secondary architectures list. Fixed. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/bunny.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/bunny-0.93-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 06:36:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:36:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240636.m9O6aLLW008555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 02:36:20 EDT --- [rpmbuild at rocky-test i386]$ rp ldtp-1.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm ldtp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ldtplib/__init__.py 0644 ldtp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ldtplib/ldtprecorder.py 0644 ldtp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ldtplib/libldtpcodegen.py 0644 ldtp.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ldtplib/ldtpcommon.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. May be use sed -e '/^#!\//,1 d' -i %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/ldtplib/ [rpmbuild at rocky-test SRPMS]$ rp -i ldtp-1.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [rpmbuild at rocky-test i386]$ rp -i ldtp-debuginfo-1.3.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Builds fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=900276 Review ldtp rpmlint - x needs work naming - OK packaging guidelines - OK license - OK license field - OK spec file legible and written in American English - OK source matches upstream - OK (md5sum) architectures supported - OK build Require - OK locale - N/A directories owned - OK no duplicate files - OK permissions - OK %install and %check have " rm -rf %{buildroot} " - OK description and summary - OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:07:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466223] Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240707.m9O77Vn4012790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth 2008-10-24 03:07:30 EDT --- F-8 and F-9 packages now available in stable updates repo. We're done here. Thanks for the review Tibbs (as always). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240707.m9O77XON012813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Bug 466237 depends on bug 466223, which changed state. Bug 466223 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sysadm-Install - Typical installation tasks for system administrators https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:25:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240725.m9O7PGNi015525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #10 from Ondrej Vasik 2008-10-24 03:25:15 EDT --- Thanks, ok, have to upgrade my rpmlint, because my version complained about ".html" file as well - and because it was created at build time, I used iconv in build section. Will move it to prep again without releasenotes.html conversion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:29:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240729.m9O7TIGC015741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-24 03:29:17 EDT --- > + You could consider adding CHANGES to %doc as it gives an indication of > the direction the project is taking. > > Done I think you forgot to add it. :-) > xx - ExcludeArch is needed > The upstream page (http://code.google.com/p/bunny-the-fuzzer/) says: > "Bunny is currently known to support Linux, ... on IA32 and IA64 > systems." > One should note that IA64 is different from x86_64 or amd64. So it would > be a good idea to cross-check whether IA64 has been mistakenly used to > refer to x86_64 or amd64, and whether x86_64 or amd64 is supported or not. > I think that x86_64 is supported since it seemed to work with gcc.x86_64. > In case IA64 has been mistakenly used, we should ExcludeArch ia64, > alongwith the other secondary architectures (ie., alpha, arm, s390, sparc) > which might not be supported. > > From http://code.google.com/p/bunny-the-fuzzer/wiki/BunnyDoc > > """The only platforms known to work fine are Linux, flavors of BSD, and Cygwin > on IA32 platforms. Support for 64-bit and other unix systems is not confirmed. > There is no support for non-x86 architectures, although this requires very few > tweaks to correct. """ > > so ia32 it works. ia64 and other non-x86 need to be excluded. Although x86_64 is not ia32 bunny seems to work on Fedora 9 x86_64 for me. I am not sure about this particular architecture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:31:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240731.m9O7VjlW021160@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 03:31:44 EDT --- Just a few comments on your spec file. Release: 1 - add %{?dist} -> Release: 1%{?dist} Source: rear-%{version}.tar.gz - The source should come from upstream. Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL License: GPL - is GPLv3+ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Packager: Schlomo Schapiro , Gratien D'haese - Packager tag is not used in Fedora Provides: rear - This package doesn't provide any virtual packages. I think it's save to remove https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Other_tags Vendor: probusiness Berlin AG and IT3 Consultants - Vendor tag is not used in Fedora %files section - Please use macros it will be easier to maintain the package in the future https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Macros Details about the changelog https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo or https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines for further details. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:39:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240739.m9O7dJEQ017173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 03:39:18 EDT --- If this is your first package, you need to seek a sponsor. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240740.m9O7e923017534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 03:40:09 EDT --- >I think you forgot to add it. :-) Aah! yes. Included now. it works on x86. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/bunny-0.93-4.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/bunny.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 07:44:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 03:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240744.m9O7iVqL017980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(gratien.dhaese at it | |3.be) --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 03:44:30 EDT --- Another appendix In your spec file is 'Version: 1.7.7' but the current stable version is 1.6 (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835&package_id=196474) and the development version is 1.7.6 (http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835&package_id=287824). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 08:04:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240804.m9O84K8G021698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-24 04:04:19 EDT --- - source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field TCL matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. FAIL latest version is being packaged. - upstream has new version 2.2.8 OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Please consider update to the latest version, if it's possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 08:11:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462835] Review Request: perl-Math-Calc-Units - Human-readable unit-aware calculator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240811.m9O8Bvlg028090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462835 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 04:11:56 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file. release: 1 - add %{?dist} -> Release: 1%{?dist} license: GPL or Artistic - Should be License: GPL+ or Artistic https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag buildrequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) - Should be Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires source: Math-Calc-Units-1.06.tar.gz - The source should come from upstream. Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL %changelog - add some thning like * Fri Sep 19 2008 - 1.06-1 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs For more details about packaging perl stuff please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 08:39:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240839.m9O8dm3V027888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #7 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-24 04:39:47 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 08:39:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240839.m9O8dwgF027937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 08:49:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 04:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240849.m9O8nCWD002463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 04:49:11 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file. %define name python-suds %define version 0.3.1 %define release 1 Name: %{name} Version: %{version} Release: %{release} - You duplicate the content, the following line will be enough. Name: python-suds Version: 0.3.1 Release: 11%{?dist} Source0: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - The source should come from upstream. I guess something like the line below will work, but I'm not sure Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/suds/attachment/wiki/WikiStart/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz?format=raw https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL %description - There is no need for a space in front of every line, but is only cosmetically %install and %files - You shouldn't rely on INSTALLED_FILES, as that will not list directories, which will need to be specified in the %files section as well. Using globs in the %files section is safer. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture %changelog - The word 'release' is not nessesary, just ...com> - 0.3.1-1 There is no need for a space in front of every line https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Details about Python modules: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 09:14:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240914.m9O9EfPd002758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 05:14:40 EDT --- I also downloaded these scenes from the previous link: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/example_scenes.zip and got this very nice result: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/Yafaray_Graphical_Rendering_Output.png This is the view of my blender window with yafaray: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/quick_exterior_yafa.blend.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 09:42:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240942.m9O9g9kC008677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-24 05:42:07 EDT --- Thanks for the review and for CVS. Imported and Build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 09:44:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 05:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810240944.m9O9ieWh008928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-24 05:44:38 EDT --- Fedora DS Graph 1.0.2 was released at 22 September, 2008. An other appendix: %description - The line in the description is longer than 80 characters. rpmlint will complain about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:00:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241000.m9OA0YMH012221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 Jonathan Roberts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonrob.one at googlemail.com --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-24 06:00:32 EDT --- OK - finally got the new upstream release. Updated the package to this latest release, and fixed all the comments from the review so far: SPEC File: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/go-home-applet.spec SRPM File: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/go-home-applet-0.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:24:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241024.m9OAOYr8020683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Jonathan Roberts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonrob.one at googlemail.com --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-24 06:24:33 EDT --- Updated the spec file to the latest upstream, and I believe this should pass review now. SPEC File: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/maximus.spec SRPM File: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/maximus-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:54:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241054.m9OAswBI021681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-24 06:54:57 EDT --- Ref "Provides: rear", Fabian is right. Please ditch it and let rpmbuild pick whatever it needs to pick. It would also be nice if you could respect the template we are using for fedora spec files. Sticking the changelog in the middle of the spec is neither incorrect nor forbidden but it is very unusual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241052.m9OAqcM4021473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #31 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-24 06:52:34 EDT --- Excellent, everything seems OK, package is APPROVED However, for a smoother experience, please add to the README.fedora file that SELinux will prevent by default smokeping from working, unless a couple of commands are used to change the context. My preliminary tests in rawhide have shown that the following two commands are needed at least: chcon -v -R --type=httpd_sys_script_exec_t /usr/share/smokeping/cgi/ chcon -v -R --type=httpd_sys_content_t /var/lib/smokeping/ A few other rules are needed, because I still get some errors. audit2allow says the following policy is needed: module smokeudpsocket 1.0; require { type httpd_sys_script_t; class udp_socket connect; } #============= httpd_sys_script_t ============== allow httpd_sys_script_t self:udp_socket connect; As my config is very small and uses very few of smokeping's facilities, I am almost sure other rules are also needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:53:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:53:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241053.m9OAr1xK026001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 10:59:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 06:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241059.m9OAxYDK026965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 06:59:33 EDT --- Here are the other images: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/max3d_house3.png http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/max3d_kuchnia.png http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/test_transpshadows.png http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/zarowki.png http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray_test.png http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/glossy_tests.png Blender is a really very, very nice software ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:04:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241104.m9OB4HNK023377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 07:04:16 EDT --- rpmlint warning: go-home-applet.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/go-home-applet.schemas correct it with %config %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/go-home-applet.schemas but then it triggers conffile-without-noreplace-flag warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:07:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241107.m9OB75Hx024166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241112.m9OBCI1i025197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gratien.dhaese at it | |3.be) | --- Comment #6 from Gratien D'haese 2008-10-24 07:12:17 EDT --- Thank you all for the very useful comments. I'm digging into the docs (sorry I hadn't seen these before) and trying to get it straight. Will use rpmlint to investigate the spec before I uploaded it again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241117.m9OBHZQJ030489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #10 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 07:17:33 EDT --- and from other packages with schemas it looks like you will need ad %preun section %preun export GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE=`gconftool-2 --get-default-source` gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/go-home-applet.schemas > /dev/null || : but I'm not sure about it... look at eg. totem's spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:26:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241126.m9OBQX1t027716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 07:26:32 EDT --- The same as for go-home-applet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241130.m9OBUZYB028385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #13 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-24 07:30:33 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.86/homestead.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.86/homestead-0.86-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 11:51:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 07:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241151.m9OBpm71004188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-24 07:51:47 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=61ed5375fc06e8f0e5ec89100f59cd46024c4a8a;path=/cairo/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-cairo-1.8.0-1.fc9.src.rpm New upstream version 1.8.0. This is quite an important update because it fixes a number of related segfaults in client programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459540] Review Request: mediawiki-imagemap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241200.m9OC0bLt001724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459540 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 08:00:35 EDT --- Well, about today's F-8 broken dependency for mediawiki-imagemap I tried to mail to Ismael but it is rejected (mail returned). Would you know why? So for now I write here about how to fix it. Hello, Ismael: As you know today Michael Schwendt reported that the dependency of mediawiki-imagemap is broken on F-8 ppc64 [1] as: ------------------------------------------------- mediawiki-imagemap-0-0.1.r37906.fc8.noarch requires mediawiki >= 0:1.13 ------------------------------------------------- This is because on F-8 mediawiki does not support ppc64 at all [2] (while on F-9+ mediawiki also supports ppc64). So your last change to make dependency on mediawiki unversioned like: ------------------------------------------------- -Requires: mediawiki >= 1.13 +Requires: mediawiki ------------------------------------------------- does not work. In this case you should use "ExcludeArch" like ------------------------------------------------- BuildArch: noarch %if 0%{?fedora} == 8 ExcludeArch: ppc64 %endif Requires: mediawiki >= 1.13 ------------------------------------------------- This may seem strange because mediawiki-imagemap itself is noarch, however Fedora package server treats this correctly, so this method is valid [3] Also, please make it sure that F-8 package has EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) not larger than F-9, F-10. Currently F-9 mediawiki-imagemap has $ koji latest-pkg dist-f9-updates mediawiki-imagemap Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- mediawiki-imagemap-0-0.1.r37906.fc9 dist-f9-updates olea so F-8 mediawiki-imagemap must not have "0-0.2.xxxxx" as EVR (0-0.2.rXXXX.fc8 > 0-0.1.rXXXX.fc9). In this case you can use "0.1.r37906%{?dist}.1" for release number (see [4] ). By the way as F-8 support is near end, while it is preferable that you fix the spec file and build a new srpm for dist-f8-updates-candidate, I don't think that pushing this (submitting push request on bodhi) for F-8 branch only to fix dependency problem for ppc64 is needed. (see: [5] ) [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02277.html [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=65333 [3] http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-October/msg00265.html [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches [5] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02280.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:07:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241207.m9OC79EA003260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |randyn3lrx at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:21:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241221.m9OCLZ10010659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 08:21:34 EDT --- php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:24:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:24:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241224.m9OCOosn011101@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 08:24:49 EDT --- php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Auth-1.6.1-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460660] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241226.m9OCQh0Y008031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460660 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-24 08:26:42 EDT --- Imported to RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:28:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241228.m9OCSl5k008278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 --- Comment #7 from Gratien D'haese 2008-10-24 08:28:46 EDT --- Updated the Blocks field with "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" as I still need a sponsor. Updated the rear.spec file and rear source rpm: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.src.rpm On our development version 1.7.7 has been uploaded to SF: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835&package_id=287824 If there are any other points let me know how I can be of any help. thanks, Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:38:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241238.m9OCc6sS013898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #10 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-24 08:38:05 EDT --- One more mail from Sam Vilain on (re-)licensing: > Given you apparently tried already to get it re-licenced I assume you > are fine with GPL, right? > > What about "Catalyst IT (NZ) Limited" listed in the man-page? Given you > are still listed as maintainer @ CPAN I assume this is the company you > are working for? Yes, I can speak for that copyright holder, and they are happy to license under any FSF-approved Free Software license, including the Perl Artistic/GPL disjunction. Sent mail to the original author (Jean-Louis Leroy) now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241241.m9OCfwIF014758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-24 08:41:57 EDT --- Should that warning not just be ignored, as in the case of this message: https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=threaded&order=ASC&topic_id=50619&forum=11&move=prev&topic_time=1201106053 Trying to find documentation on the correct way to handle .schemas files, but seems scant on the ground. Asking in IRC. will try mailing list next. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458139] Review Request: ruby-pam - Ruby bindings for pam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241250.m9OCoIBL016591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458139 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 12:58:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241258.m9OCwwsQ014387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #12 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 08:58:57 EDT --- %config should help, other question is, if it should be noreplace. I don't think so, it's not manually edited config file and it has to be replaced when installing new package. It can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:26:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241326.m9ODQHpJ020325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #13 from Bastien Nocera 2008-10-24 09:26:16 EDT --- No just mark them as config. They _need_ to be replaced on updates, otherwise you don't get the new default, or the new config entries set in the database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:34:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241334.m9ODY5rR026735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #14 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 09:34:04 EDT --- Even marking them as config is questionable. Schema is not config file, it's more template for config files and should go to /usr/share. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:37:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241337.m9ODbuw9022350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-24 09:37:56 EDT --- Yeah, I'm getting mixed advice here! See Matthias message on devel... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02326.html Have updated the spec file, hopefully with correct pre, post etc but am testing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467420] Review Request: mingw32-gtk2 - MinGW Windows Gtk2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241341.m9ODf0nf023080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467420 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-24 09:40:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=3e4efcc61ee75e92533c944912e3ea317da288fa;path=/gtk2/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gtk2-2.14.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:41:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467419] Review Request: mingw32-pango - MinGW Windows Pango library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241341.m9ODfWDf023151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467419 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-24 09:41:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=9731189432a7424689da169dd731fbff451bd746;path=/pango/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-pango-1.22.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:43:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468376] New: Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=3e4efcc61ee75e92533c944912e3ea317da288fa;path=/SDL/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-SDL-1.2.13-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:43:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241343.m9ODhmch028984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468376 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:43:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468376] Review Request: mingw32-SDL - MinGW Windows port of SDL cross-platform multimedia library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241343.m9ODhlft028962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468376 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berrange at redhat.com Depends on| |454410 Alias| |mingw32-SDL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241342.m9ODg06E028601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-24 09:41:59 EDT --- OK, but the problem isn't with yafaray-xml ( which works - even if blender isn't installed). But with the communication between blender and yafaray. I don't know if blender needs to be built with yafaray support somehow. The site only tell that yafaray now works with "official blender" without telling which options/code are used for this official build. It should be possible to reproduce a "official like" built of blender to support yafaray (if needed). Actually I was using the "official" Fedora 8 x86_64 package of blender.(blender-2.47-5.fc8 ). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:47:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241347.m9ODlhB4024448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 09:47:42 EDT --- I've just looked at other packages which are packaging schema files and some are using config, some aren't. So we can ignore it at all. Correct usage of gconftool is more important currently. It's my opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 13:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241358.m9ODwbsn026637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-24 09:58:36 EDT --- OK, that makes sense to me. I've updated the spec file, but I'm quite unsure of how these gconf bits are meant to work. Have uploaded it to the same location and hope somebody can shed some light for me. SPEC File: http://jonrob.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/go-home-applet.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241403.m9OE3MDD000820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-24 10:03:20 EDT --- IMO this package is not named properly: Should be gnome-applet-go-home with a provides for the upstream name, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:04:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241404.m9OE4SBJ001003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #35 from David Kaylor 2008-10-24 10:04:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > > Thanks. I just did a Koji build & submitted my CVS request. For now, I listed > > only f-9 but maybe I should have included f-10? > > F-10 branch is also created as "devel" directory in this case so > don't worry (unless you need early branching). OK. I'll look at adding it closer to the final release date - the f-10 build does succeed in Koji. I am having trouble with CVS: [dkaylor at localhost ~]$ ls .fedora* .fedora.cert .fedora-server-ca.cert .fedora-upload-ca.cert [dkaylor at localhost ~]$ fedora-cvs tasque Checking out tasque from fedora cvs: Error: Permission denied (publickey). cvs [checkout aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) Is my request correct or is something else not set up? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:36:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451768] Review Request: go-home-applet - applet for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241436.m9OEaZkw007885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451768 --- Comment #19 from Jaroslav Reznik 2008-10-24 10:36:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > IMO this package is not named properly: Should be gnome-applet-go-home with a > provides for the upstream name... Hmm, good point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:31:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:31:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451773] Review Request: window-picker-applet - an alternative window chooser for small screens In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241431.m9OEVueD006882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451773 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-24 10:31:54 EDT --- Just like in bug #451768 I suggest to rename this package to gnome-applet-window-picker (with a "Provides: window-picker-applet"). See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:38:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241438.m9OEcJJK001552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #37 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 10:38:18 EDT --- By the way tasque module is not ready yet on Fedora CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:36:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241436.m9OEakUO001331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 10:36:45 EDT --- Please make it sure that you have ssh keys and have uploaded ssh public key to Fedora Account System: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem#What_is_an_SSH_key.2C_and_why_do_I_need_one.3F https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cryptography -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:40:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241440.m9OEexWD008888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #15 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-24 10:40:57 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/nocpulse-common/nocpulse-common-2.0.8-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:38:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241438.m9OEcBw3008280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 10:38:10 EDT --- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Ok. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . Ok. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . FIX: Rename patch to parprouted-makefile.patch, tag with Patch0: Question: What's with the real_version business? Why not use the real version? Question: Why no initscripts? - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. OK. - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 OK. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. Local mock rawhide build completed successfully. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Fix: Why set the man page executable? Drop the 0755 from defattr, and set attr manually on the binary. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) NA. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. OK. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK. In summary: Initscripts, permissions, version numbering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:58:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241458.m9OEwVUG005670@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 10:58:29 EDT --- This one looks good, note Andreas' comments. I'd like to see one or two more. And one sponsored, you can come back and approve. Unless, Andreas, you really want to make F-10, in which case, I can. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 14:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241458.m9OEwlxR011981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 10:58:46 EDT --- jmol-11.6-5.10137svn.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jmol-11.6-5.10137svn.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241500.m9OF08e2012573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #12 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 11:00:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > OK, but the problem isn't with yafaray-xml ( which works - even if blender > isn't installed). But with the communication between blender and yafaray. > I don't know if blender needs to be built with yafaray support somehow. The > site only tell that yafaray now works with "official blender" without telling > which options/code are used for this official build. It should be possible to > reproduce a "official like" built of blender to support yafaray (if needed). > > Actually I was using the "official" Fedora 8 x86_64 package of > blender.(blender-2.47-5.fc8 ). I tried the official Fedora 8 package and got the same problem you had. In fact, the problem seems to be the blender scrits. When blender starts, it creates symbolic links for all of its scripts in ~/.blender/scripts. If I use my version (even the 2.47 one), leave the links in ~/.blender/scripts, and then install Fedora version, I can load yafaray. I do not have anything special in the version I compile, but ffmpeg. We have to try to figure out what is causing the problem. Can you just try this version and see if it works for you? http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/rpms/rpms8/blender-2.48-15.fc8.i386.rpm I am going to make a diff of the spec files. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241506.m9OF66b9013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:04:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241504.m9OF4jt8013379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-24 11:04:44 EDT --- of course that person who approved the package doesnt have the ability to approve packages. I do approve it. with the same conditions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:06:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241506.m9OF6IRd014021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:06:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241506.m9OF6GBm013983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-24 11:06:15 EDT --- sblim-sfcb-base will need a minor update after this package is approved, to BR: sblim-indication_helper-devel, to automatically pick up indication support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:02:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241502.m9OF2e28013090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgilmore at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-24 11:02:39 EDT --- 52289f16f8504f954369c6a3f065eec7892d6649 nocpulse-common-2.0.8.tar.gz 52289f16f8504f954369c6a3f065eec7892d6649 /home/dgilmore/rpmbuild/SOURCES/nocpulse-common-2.0.8.tar.gz sha1sum of source matches rpmlint gives nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/nocpulse nocpulse nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided NPusers nocpulse-common.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided np-config i disagree with not putting provides in but ill accept it without. builds in mock on rawhide. # This src.rpm is cannonical upstream # You can obtain it using this set of commands # git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spacewalk.git/ # cd monitoring/nocpulse-common # make srpm needs to be removed from the spec. but can be done at import time. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453109] Review Request: nocpulse-common - Add NOCpulse users and includes common files for NOCpulse. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241508.m9OF8unc007941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453109 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at v3.sk |dennis at ausil.us -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:09:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:09:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241509.m9OF9SIr008010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 --- Comment #10 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-24 11:09:26 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:10:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:10:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462381] Review Request: beediff - Visual tool for comparing and merging files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241510.m9OFATfo008611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462381 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241514.m9OFEc3p009278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:13:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241513.m9OFDB45009126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-24 11:13:10 EDT --- Thanks! Will add SElinux info to README. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: smokeping Short Description: Latency Logging and Graphing System Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241518.m9OFI004016266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #19 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-24 11:17:59 EDT --- Sorry for delay. It's up to you, you decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:24:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241524.m9OFOPBW011217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #33 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-24 11:24:24 EDT --- For the record: I am using it for several months on F7 without any issues, so I guess (provided the deps are met), F-8 is also a branch which could make use of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:35:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241535.m9OFZW2h013387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 11:35:31 EDT --- I'm happy with a modified tarball: SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg.spec SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/cfdg/cfdg-2.1-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241535.m9OFZ94q019240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 --- Comment #34 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-24 11:35:08 EDT --- Ok, adding F-8. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: smokeping Short Description: Latency Logging and Graphing System Owners: terjeros Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:36:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241536.m9OFaKn5013538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #13 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 11:36:19 EDT --- I think I got it: Just do: cd ~/.blender/scripts ln -s /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafrayinterface.so . ln -s /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafqt.so . and it should work with the official Fedora version. These two shared libraries are in the yafaray-blender package. My blender version creates these two symbolic links in the user home directory, but the Fedora version does not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:36:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241536.m9OFalMA019565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #14 from Randall Berry 2008-10-24 11:36:46 EDT --- Approved, everything looks good. Thanks for your patience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241546.m9OFkd11021207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-24 11:46:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: genome Short Description: Package for the Genome Project Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: kanarip -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:44:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:44:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241544.m9OFi5BE020581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |herrold at owlriver.com --- Comment #15 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 11:44:04 EDT --- The law of unintended packaging consequesces may be in play here. On a scratch build without a set --vendor tag set I get: + desktop-file-install --dir=/var/tmp/homestead-0.86-1orc-root-herrold/usr/share/applications /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SOURCES/homestead.desktop Must specify the vendor namespace for these files with --vendor error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.49715 (%install) so a portibility patch of having a %define localvendor %vendor%nil and then using localvendor construct is needed, here and in the the broader policy? No criticism of this fine effort within the four walls of fedora and rhel %vendor, but ... Just talking out loud here on the broader issue of NOT fighting with other efforts in how spec files are written. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:50:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241550.m9OFoIqa015889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458024] Review Request: sblim-sfcc - Small Footprint CIM Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241550.m9OFoGx1015828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458024 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241550.m9OFoJ4b015914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:50:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241550.m9OFoK47015955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 15:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241550.m9OFoHFm015857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468400 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:00:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241600.m9OG0J6U023767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-24 12:00:18 EDT --- Great, I can't find any issues with the update package: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:06:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241606.m9OG6VVN024854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 12:06:30 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cfdg Short Description: Context Free Design Grammar Owners: limb Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241608.m9OG8leh019175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452450 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:12:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241612.m9OGCsgV020030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #16 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 12:12:53 EDT --- actually digging futher, it seems that there is are a couple of warnings (although not properly flagged as such by the freedesktop.org tool) [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ desktop-file-install --vendor=orc --dir=/var/tmp/homestead-0.86-1orc-root-herrold/usr/share/applications /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SOURCES/homestead.desktop /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SOURCES/homestead.desktop: missing encoding (guessed UTF-8) /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SOURCES/homestead.desktop: key "Categories" string list not semicolon-terminated, fixing ============================== This patch to SOURCE1 fixes the matter [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ diff -u homestead.desktop-ORIG homestead.desktop --- homestead.desktop-ORIG 2008-10-24 12:11:12.000000000 -0400 +++ homestead.desktop 2008-10-24 12:11:34.000000000 -0400 @@ -5,4 +5,7 @@ Comment=An 3D real-time network visualiser Exec=homestead Icon=homestead -Categories=Network +Categories=Network; +# and a deprecated item needed to quell a warning +Encoding=UTF-8 + [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:20:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241620.m9OGK9Ho021509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com, | |quantumburnz at hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-24 12:20:08 EDT --- ***Unofficial Review*** This is a pretty easy review considering "- now meets Fedora packaging guidelines too" is a change in 2.19.1-1. :D However, here are my comments. * Output from rpmlint: cim-schema.src: W: invalid-license Any permissive 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Hopefully Spot can provide some insight into that for you. * In your %install macro, you have MOFDIR=/usr/share/mof. I don't think it's required but you can substitute %{_datadir} for /usr/share. The list of these macros is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros. * Builds without any problems on i386 32-bit. Looks pretty good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:36:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241636.m9OGaMkx029866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #17 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 12:36:21 EDT --- An Implementation of comment 15 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924#c15 showing a vendor and dist tag neutral packaging approach, and a 'worked case' diff are as follows: [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ ls homestead-0.86-1.fc10.src.rpm homestead.desktop-RPH~ homestead.spec-RPH homestead.desktop homestead.spec homestead.spec-RPH~ homestead.desktop-ORIG homestead.spec~ homestead.desktop-RPH homestead.spec-ORIG [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ rpm -qlp /home/herrold/rpmbuild/SRPMS/homestead-0.86-1orc.src.rpm homestead.desktop homestead.png homestead.spec homestead086.tar.gz [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ rpm -qlp /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/homestead-0.86-1orc.x86_64.rpm /usr/bin/homestead /usr/sbin/hsen /usr/share/applications/orc-homestead.desktop /usr/share/doc/homestead-0.86 /usr/share/doc/homestead-0.86/COPYING /usr/share/doc/homestead-0.86/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/homestead-0.86/README /usr/share/man/man1/homestead.1.gz /usr/share/man/man8/hsen.8.gz /usr/share/pixmaps/homestead.png [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ diff -u homestead.spec-ORIG homestead.spec --- homestead.spec-ORIG 2008-10-24 11:49:24.000000000 -0400 +++ homestead.spec 2008-10-24 12:32:47.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ %define srcversion 086 -%define vendor '%vendor%nil' +%define localvendor %vendor%nil Name: homestead Version: 0.86 @@ -49,7 +49,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -desktop-file-install --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ +# seemingly 'desktop-file-install' is needed as its requirements +# could somehow not be handled by 'install' at freedesktop.org for +# managing .desktop files, whereas 'install' seems fine for pixmaps +desktop-file-install --vendor=%localvendor --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE1} install -p -D -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png @@ -66,7 +69,10 @@ %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.* %{_mandir}/man8/hsen.* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png -%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop +# +# two possible approaches here --specific or wildcarded +%{_datadir}/applications/%{localvendor}-%{name}.desktop +%{_datadir}/applications/*%{name}.desktop %changelog [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:38:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241638.m9OGcqi5024403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #18 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 12:38:51 EDT --- I have upstreamed the needed enhancement to desktop-file-install to permit SEEING and FIXING suspect .desktop files at: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:39:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241639.m9OGdUnp024482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 R P Herrold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- External Bug ID| |FreeDesktop.org 18206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:41:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] New: Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 Summary: Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dwalluck at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description : Provides a library of matcher objects (also known as constraints or predicates) allowing 'match' rules to be defined declaratively, to be used in other frameworks. Typical scenarios include testing frameworks, mocking libraries and UI validation rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:42:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241642.m9OGgd52025254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 12:42:36 EDT --- Okay. 2 Notes: * Documents - Please add the following files to %doc ------------------------------------------------- src/org/freedesktop/tango/COPYING ------------------------------------------------- Note that this file also has "COPYING" name so this has to be renamed, for example by: ------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q -n %{name} cp -p src/org/freedesktop/tango/COPYING COPYING.CC-BY-SA # remove prebuild binaries find . -name '*.jar' -exec rm {} \; find . -name '.hg*' -exec rm -rf {} \; || : ------------------------------------------------- * %changelog - Please update %changelog (the last entry does not coincide with current rpm EVR). Other things are okay ------------------------------------------------- This package (gstreamer-java) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:42:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241642.m9OGgHat031065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #1 from David Walluck 2008-10-24 12:42:17 EDT --- This package is required by junit4 4.4 and later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:44:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241644.m9OGijF8031285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(christian at whoop.o | |rg) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 12:44:44 EDT --- Currently who is the submitter and who is the reviewer? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:49:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:49:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241649.m9OGn8XW032207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-24 12:49:07 EDT --- Jon, I'd appreciate that. Thx. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:48:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241648.m9OGmSEt032146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 12:48:28 EDT --- Christian is the submitter, and Andreas is the reviewer, AFAIK. Andreas can now sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241648.m9OGmBkU032096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dennis at ausil.us Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-24 12:48:10 EDT --- fails to build in mock + /usr/bin/python setup.py build /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.j4MeWz: line 29: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory need to BR python -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:50:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241650.m9OGowNU032644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #19 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 12:50:56 EDT --- Preparing to install homestead on a border router to place 'hsen' on a well placed sampling location, I find that it pulls in WAYY too much, and particularly GUI parts that are not welcome, and will never be used in such a context. This causes problems with the security policy model for such units. [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ rpm -q --requires homestead libGL.so.1()(64bit) libGLU.so.1()(64bit) ... libglut.so.3()(64bit) ... [herrold at centos-5 ~]$ The 'hsen' sampler needs to be split out to a sub package, such as '-sampler' -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241655.m9OGth9A027785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:53:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241653.m9OGrCwE027196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 12:53:11 EDT --- Taking assignment. . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:54:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241654.m9OGsPUS000699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 12:54:24 EDT --- APPROVED. I essentially re-reviewed it to check Paulo's work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:52:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241652.m9OGqcaS000573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 12:52:36 EDT --- Reis, would you update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:54:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241654.m9OGsqPI000780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(christian at whoop.o | |rg) | --- Comment #12 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-24 12:54:51 EDT --- Jon got that right. As discussed with Christian, he's happy for me to do the review, so I'll just set the flags then, and assign it. Everybody happy with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 16:57:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:57:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460886] Review Request: libnetdude - a libpcap trace file manipulation library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241657.m9OGvGAo028089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460886 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-24 12:57:15 EDT --- A note about the libnetdude.spec from me, that one is a package I created for some project at Red Hat and posted here for reference. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:01:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241701.m9OH1Q5q002299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #20 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 13:01:25 EDT --- This patch does the split to meet that goal. As I have mand a substantive change, and add a Changelog entry I bump the Release here [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ rpm -qp --requires /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/homestead-sampler-0.86-2orc.x86_64.rpm libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpcap.so.0.9.4()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ diff -u homestead.spec-ORIG homestead.spec --- homestead.spec-ORIG 2008-10-24 11:49:24.000000000 -0400 +++ homestead.spec 2008-10-24 13:00:32.000000000 -0400 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ %define srcversion 086 -%define vendor '%vendor%nil' +%define localvendor %vendor%nil Name: homestead Version: 0.86 -Release: 1%{?dist} +Release: 2%{?dist} Summary: 3D real-time network visualiser Group: Applications/Internet @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ BuildRequires: libpcap-devel BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils +%package sampler +Summary: sampling client for %{name} +Group: Applications/Internet +License: GPLv2+ %description Homestead is a 3D real-time network visualizer, displaying @@ -36,6 +40,12 @@ same subnet, receiving packet header information from hsen via broadcast). +%description sampler +hsen (Homestead Sensor) is a (possibly remote) packet capture daemon which +reads and sends packet header information to Homestead, locally or remotely. +hsen also equates hostname to IP by reading DNS packets (UDP type A class IN +standard query response). + %prep %setup -q -n %{name}%{srcversion} @@ -49,7 +59,10 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} -desktop-file-install --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ +# seemingly 'desktop-file-install' is needed as its requirements +# could somehow not be handled by 'install' at freedesktop.org for +# managing .desktop files, whereas 'install' seems fine for pixmaps +desktop-file-install --vendor=%localvendor --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE1} install -p -D -m 0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png @@ -62,14 +75,25 @@ %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc README COPYING ChangeLog %{_bindir}/%{name} -%{_sbindir}/hsen %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.* -%{_mandir}/man8/hsen.* %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png -%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop +# +# two possible approaches here --specific or wildcarded +%{_datadir}/applications/%{localvendor}-%{name}.desktop +%{_datadir}/applications/*%{name}.desktop + + +%files sampler +%defattr(-,root,root,-) +%{_sbindir}/hsen +%{_mandir}/man8/hsen.* %changelog +* Fri Oct 24 2008 R P Herrold - 0.86-2 +- split out a -sampler sub-package to avoid dragging in the unneeded + GUI on remote TUI only sample heads + * Wed Oct 22 2008 Simon Wesp - 0.86-1 - Update to 0.86 [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:03:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241703.m9OH3MZc029005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 Permaine Cheung changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pcheung at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pcheung at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 13:03:21 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241708.m9OH8mxY003566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-24 13:08:47 EDT --- Thank you Jon. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ladvd Short Description: CDP/LLDP sender for unix Owners: ixs Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:19:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:19:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241719.m9OHJ9wM031685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 13:19:08 EDT --- Okay, one question for this package: * easy-install.pth - Is this file needed? It seems that this file is created when using setuptools.command.easy_install so if other package also creates this file by using setuptools.command.easy_install it will easily makes conflict with the package. And I will wait for your pre-review or another review request (if you have no other packages currently you want to submit you can do a pre-review of other person's review request). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241735.m9OHZ92u007889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #21 from R P Herrold 2008-10-24 13:35:05 EDT --- Sadly I get function problems, but these seem outside of homestead [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ sudo rpm -Uvh /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/homestead-0.86-2orc.x86_64.rpm [sudo] password for herrold: Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:homestead ########################################### [100%] [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ homestead libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5a Segmentation fault [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ homestead libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5a Segmentation fault [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ homestead libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5a Segmentation fault [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ homestead libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5a Segmentation fault [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ homestead libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x5a Segmentation fault [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ rpm -qa \*GL mesa-libGL-6.5.1-7.5.el5 mesa-libGL-6.5.1-7.5.el5 [herrold at centos-5 homestead]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:44:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241744.m9OHiijA009531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #15 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-24 13:44:43 EDT --- easy-install.pth can go. I'll repackage it as soon as I'm at a Fedora machine. I'm working on packaging webmin (off the wishlist), but I don't have it quite put together yet. The author has it set up to put pretty much EVERYTHING into /usr/libexec, and rpmlint isn't particularly happy about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:48:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241748.m9OHmQM9003937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 John Eckersberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:47:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241747.m9OHliiB010244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 --- Comment #13 from John Eckersberg 2008-10-24 13:47:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: PyYAML New Branches: F-9 EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jeckersb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:50:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241750.m9OHoGkP010735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 John Eckersberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from John Eckersberg 2008-10-24 13:50:15 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-netaddr New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jeckersb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:53:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:53:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241753.m9OHrKfb004821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Ortel 2008-10-24 13:53:19 EDT --- Thanks for the great comments! Implemented all suggestions with the exception of changing %Source0 to be a URL to the fedorahosted wiki. I'm not sure I understand this. If I make this change, rpmbuild fails. Also, I looked at (2) other fedora hosted projects that I'm pretty sure are fedora packages and their %Source0 looked like mine. Can you help me understand this better? Also, seems like the spec should be named suds.spec. Can I change this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241800.m9OI0Urb006512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-24 14:00:29 EDT --- No problem. New SPEC: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tktreectrl.spec New SRPM: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:59:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241759.m9OHxBa1005880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 --- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke 2008-10-24 13:59:10 EDT --- I accidentally used the wrong version of the SRPM. The makefile in git doesn't version unless you have commited, and apparently that bit me. http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jabberpy-0.5-0.16.fc9.src.rpm http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/jabberpy.spec Sorry about that. This should be a whole lot better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 17:58:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241758.m9OHwafw005799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 13:58:35 EDT --- Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. Debian seems to name binary debs providing system wide libraries as libXXXXX (like libpango1.0-0) while Fedora simply names binary rpms using source tarball name as much as possible (like pango) (For me I maintain oniguruma while debian uses libonig as binary deb names...) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming By the way rebuild fails on ppc64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901509 Now that I am sponsoring you, you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpms on koji by $ koji build --scratch where target can be dist-f11, dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate or dist-f8-updates-candidate. If the build is successful, the rebuilt rpms and some logs are put for one week or so under: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:08:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241808.m9OI8cX9008008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 --- Comment #14 from John Eckersberg 2008-10-24 14:08:37 EDT --- Ignore F-9 branch on previous request, I was having a CVS idiot moment. Please create EL-4 and EL-5 still: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: PyYAML New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: jeckersb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:15:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241815.m9OIFPBf016059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 14:15:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. > > He's done that for mmdb as well; I had thought that eventually I would > understand the reason for it but I haven't figured it out yet. I guess Tim will reply in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:21:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241821.m9OIL8wL010771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-24 14:21:07 EDT --- 10bbc72c280e6c21a1101ccf3a227331b19bc3b6 /home/dgilmore/Download/jabberpy-0.5-0.tar.gz 10bbc72c280e6c21a1101ccf3a227331b19bc3b6 SOURCES/jabberpy-0.5-0.tar.gz builds in mock rpmlint gives rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. remove --record=INSTALLED_FILES from "%{__python} setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT --record=INSTALLED_FILES" when importing APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:04:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241804.m9OI48Jt007036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-24 14:04:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. He's done that for mmdb as well; I had thought that eventually I would understand the reason for it but I haven't figured it out yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:34:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241834.m9OIYJwU019362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-24 14:34:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > You SRPM link should be fc8. Also, have you any plans to add some C++ > libraries? ie boost or gtkmm? I did gtkmm - it's in our development repository. Boost is a fscking nightmare. People who write their own build systems should be shot. Or maybe since they have to program in C++ they've been punished enough already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:48:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241848.m9OIm7hL015918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #3 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 14:48:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321455) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321455) build log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 18:49:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241849.m9OIn2g7022382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #4 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 14:49:01 EDT --- I can't build this in mock (fedora-devel-i386), please see attached build.log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 19:22:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241922.m9OJMfHS022791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 15:22:40 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I added a missing "Requires: iproute" to the spec file and .src.rpm parprouted has no Initscripts because it needs a fixed IP and a pre-created Interface, typically tap0. Generally, parprouted is called before starting Virtualbox and killed afterwards. The version number follows upstream (the previous was 0.65): http://hazardous-area.org/parprouted/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 19:22:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] New: Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Summary: Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed-1.13-1.src.rpm Description: shed is an easy to use hex editor written for unix/linux using ncurses, with a friendly pico-style interface -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 19:29:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241929.m9OJTAYY030569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-24 15:29:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the review. > > I added a missing "Requires: iproute" to the spec file and .src.rpm The same URLs? And what about the permissions? > parprouted has no Initscripts because it needs a fixed IP > and a pre-created Interface, typically tap0. > > Generally, parprouted is called before starting Virtualbox and killed > afterwards. > > The version number follows upstream (the previous was 0.65): I see. That works. > http://hazardous-area.org/parprouted/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 19:49:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810241949.m9OJnMmL002063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Michael Stahnke 2008-10-24 15:49:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jabbperpy Short Description: Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs Owners: stahnma Branches: F-8, F-9, EL4, EL5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:23:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468462] New: Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468462 Summary: Review Request: sbackup - Simple Backup Suite for desktop use Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/sbackup-0.10.5/sbackup-0.10.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Simple Backup Suite is a set of backend backup daemon and GNOME GUI frontends that provide a simple yet powerful backup solution for common desktop users. Backups can be written to local directory or remote servers using GNOME VFS technology. A fine control is possible regarding what folders and files to backup. Files can be excluded even with a set of regular expressions. Regular backups can be scheduled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:25:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242025.m9OKPdpG010144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #7 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 16:25:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Thanks for the review. > > > > I added a missing "Requires: iproute" to the spec file and .src.rpm > > The same URLs? And what about the permissions? I recreated the .src.rpm with mock and now the files are owned by mockbuild: [cascavel:~/RPMS8/lcgrpms/src] als parprouted-0.70-2.fc8.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 mockbuilmockbuil 686 Aug 10 10:18 makefile.patch -rw-r--r-- 1 mockbuilmockbuil 18844 Jan 27 2008 parprouted-0.7.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 mockbuilmockbuil 1542 Oct 24 14:13 parprouted.spec SRPM: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/parprouted-0.70-2.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/parprouted.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:28:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242028.m9OKSJqG003303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #13 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-24 16:28:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. > I'd be happy to rename it gpp4 and gpp4-devel (as I originally packaged it), but see comments 4-8 above - I'm a bit confused as to what is best here. > > By the way rebuild fails on ppc64: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901509 > Now that I am sponsoring you, you can try to rebuild arbitrary srpms > on koji by > > $ koji build --scratch > where target can be dist-f11, dist-f10, dist-f9-updates-candidate > or dist-f8-updates-candidate. > If the build is successful, the rebuilt rpms and some logs are > put for one week or so under: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch//task_ Many thanks for the tip, Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:36:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:36:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468465] New: Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 Summary: Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicoleau.fabien at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/posterazor.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/posterazor-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The PosteRazor cuts a raster image into pieces which can afterwards be printed out and assembled to a poster. As input, the PosteRazor takes a raster image. The resulting poster is saved as a multipage PDF document. An easy to use, wizard like user interface guides through 5 steps. rpmlint is silent : [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ rpmlint posterazor-1.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm posterazor-1.5-1.fc9.src.rpm posterazor-debuginfo-1.5-1.fc9.i386.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [builder at FEDOBOX tmp]$ Rebuild under mock fedora-9-i386 and fedora-8-i386 is OK Rebuild under koji is OK : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901793 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:37:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242037.m9OKb6YN013171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-24 16:37:05 EDT --- I looked at Jakub's branch and decided to stay with GCC 4.3.2 for now. We may move later, but this version of GCC has been used to build everything and it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 21:08:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242108.m9OL8TWf019809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net --- Comment #9 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-10-24 17:08:27 EDT --- As I'm building this package ( I haven't seen this review request), I will help Ankur to pushed it to the official repos. For the name, I approve the "old-standard-sfd-fonts" name (as the author accept that we just put a suffix). For the fontconfig.conf, it's not my cup of tea, so better you follow Nicolas' advices ^^ I propose this spec (http://home.scarlet.be/~tsi30161/oldstandard.spec) to show how to build the font (without changelog nor fontconfig.conf). I choose to build to .ttf as it seems that the font author prefers it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:44:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468467] Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242044.m9OKiKpK006721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:44:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242044.m9OKiL7p006752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468467 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:44:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468467] New: Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468467 Summary: Review Request: gksu - Graphical frontend to su Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gksu-2.0.0/gksu.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gksu-2.0.0/gksu-2.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gtk+ frontend to su. It supports login shells and preserving environment when acting as a su frontend. It is useful to menu items or other graphical programs that need to ask a user's password to run another program as another user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 20:43:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468466] New: Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 Summary: Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu-2.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libgksu is a library from the gksu program that provides a simple API for using su and sudo in programs that need to execute tasks as other users. It provides X authentication facilities for running programs in a X session -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 21:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242148.m9OLmn3I019214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #5 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 17:48:48 EDT --- Naming: OK Licensing: OK No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries: OK Filesystem layout: OK No Packager, Vendor tag: OK Summary tag not ending with a period: OK Source tag: OK (md5sum matches) Buildroot tag: OK %install begins with removing buildroot: OK Changelog: OK Jar file naming: OK Directory structure: OK BuildRequires and Requires: OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 22:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242223.m9OMNZBC032283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #6 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 18:23:34 EDT --- Running rpmlint against the mock built rpms: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-development-i386/result/*rpm hamcrest.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/hamcrest hamcrest-demo.i386: W: no-documentation rpm -qp --provides hamcrest-1.1-5.1.fc10.i386.rpm all-1.1.jar.so hamcrest = 0:1.1-5.1.fc10 hamcrest(x86-32) = 0:1.1-5.1.fc10 Is the Provides for all-1.1.jar.so correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 22:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242244.m9OMivBP028035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 --- Comment #7 from David Walluck 2008-10-24 18:44:56 EDT --- hamcrest.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc This is a bug in maven, as this file is not really a config file. hamcrest-demo.i386: W: no-documentation The demo depends on the main package, which contains the license. Otherwise, there is no other documentation. The all-1.1.jar.so was added automatically. It seems kind of weird. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:49:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242349.m9ONnjvK006075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:49:44 EDT --- php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:50:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242350.m9ONoHTs006537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:50:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242350.m9ONoFFR013383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:50:14 EDT --- openalchemist-0.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:51:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242351.m9ONpQP9013701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:51:26 EDT --- openalchemist-0.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:50:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242350.m9ONoTni013437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:50:28 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242350.m9ONonp5013497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460000 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:50:47 EDT --- rxtx-2.1-0.2.7r2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:51:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455211] Review Request: php-laconica - PHP tool for microblogging In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242351.m9ONpis6006982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455211 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:51:43 EDT --- php-laconica-0.5.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242352.m9ONqOXM007128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:52:23 EDT --- gflags-0.9-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242351.m9ONpWnk006915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:51:31 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:53:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242353.m9ONrL2L007395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:53:20 EDT --- ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:53:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242353.m9ONr8bO007345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:53:07 EDT --- jmol-11.6-5.10137svn.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:53:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242353.m9ONrOHf007440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:54:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:54:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458346] Review Request: gflags - Library for commandline flag processing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242354.m9ONs2G6014477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458346 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 19:54:02 EDT --- gflags-0.9-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 24 23:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466789] Review Request: jmol - an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810242353.m9ONrBER014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 00:51:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250051.m9P0pr1S016801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |quantumburnz at hotmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(roma at lcg.ufrj.br) --- Comment #1 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-24 20:51:52 EDT --- Your links for the Spec & SRPM aren't working for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 00:59:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250059.m9P0xK51023732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #7 from Harry Waye 2008-10-24 20:59:19 EDT --- I have spoken to certain people in the #boost irc chat room and have compiled boost against your packages. It works with some additions to the boost.build scripts. I'll try publish such things in a bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 01:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250159.m9P1xrxE026478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(roma at lcg.ufrj.br) | --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-24 21:59:51 EDT --- Try these ones then: Spec URL: http://dl.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/python-pyglet.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/python-pyglet-1.1.2-1.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 02:44:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250244.m9P2imcX001849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com, | |quantumburnz at hotmail.com --- Comment #2 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-24 22:44:47 EDT --- ***Unofficial Review*** * rpmlint looks good: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Why is your build number 134? I believe it should start at 1. * You don't need gcc-c++ in your BuildRequires. * I'd run rpmdev-newspec to create a sample spec file and format yours like that. I think it helps to have everything standardized for when someone looks at it. For instance, you have the 'BuildRequires' tag coming after 'Name' and it should be 'Version'. * I'm sure you'll do this if you look at the sample spec file but you should use %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) as your BuildRoot. * Your spec file license shows IBM but the upstream license shows "Common Public License" so this should probably be changed from IBM to CPL. * You should use Source0: to match the form of SourceX. * Requires -- you can leave out the following, RPM can figure them out. Requires: sblim-cmpi-devel glibc-devel * You should use %{__rm} under %install to be consistent within the spec file. * You must run %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install. That's about all I have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 02:48:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250248.m9P2mkWS008374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-24 22:48:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. > > > > I'd be happy to rename it gpp4 and gpp4-devel (as I originally packaged it), > but see comments 4-8 above - I'm a bit confused as to what is best here. Both Ralf and Jason were saying that you seemed to have some reason you want to name the binary rpm as libgpp4. However as I said on Fedora it is preferable to use tarball name for srpm/binary rpms as much as possible. And as you say you are happy with naming binary rpms as gpp4/gpp4-devel please just use these names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 02:51:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250251.m9P2pb6N003187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 Permaine Cheung changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Permaine Cheung 2008-10-24 22:51:36 EDT --- Links for the spec file and SRPM that builds successfully: http://zarb.org/~david/hamcrest.spec http://zarb.org/~david/hamcrest-1.1-5.1.jpp5.src.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 03:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250326.m9P3QtEU013997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #11 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-10-24 23:26:54 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, been a busy week. The changes have been made to new SRPM located at... http://marcbradshaw.co.uk/packages/review/sl/sl-3.03-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 07:04:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250704.m9P74F1g004976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-25 03:04:14 EDT --- Hey Jameson, I'd like to help you get the package in shape. Here are my notes: * rpmlint output: I didn't get those unused-direct-shlib-dependency warnings but I got this output: libprojectM.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/libprojectM-1.2.0/ChangeLog libprojectM.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/projectM/fonts/Vera.ttf ../../fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf libprojectM.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/projectM/fonts/VeraMono.ttf ../../fonts/bitstream-vera/VeraMono.ttf libprojectM-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The first warning can be fixed via sed -i 's/\r//' ChangeLog The other warnings can be ignored. * Source0 link needs corrected. * The license should be LGPLv2+ since the source files say "any later version". Also please recommend upstream to put a license file in their tarball. * Afaik we usually don't put a BuildRequires (BR) in sub-packages. BR: pkgconfig is redundant anyways because ftgl-devel will pull that up. Also I don't think BR:kdelibs is necessary. Am I wrong? * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). * Requires: ftgl and glew are also redundant. RPM should pick them up itself. * Is Requires: cmake (in the devel subpackage) really necessary? * You are creating but not owning %{_datadir}/projectM/ and %{_includedir}/%{name}/ directories. Those need fixed. * This part can be taken off: %if "%{_lib}" == "lib64" -DLIB_SUFFIX=64 \ %endif . * Note that, ideally, packagers should put comments in the SPEC files to tell what the patches do, or why they are there. ---- Well that's all for now. I hope this will be useful for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 07:43:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250743.m9P7h3G9010085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-25 03:43:02 EDT --- @Nicolas, I have a virtual machine at Slicehost with 256MB of ram. This isn't enough to build cryptopp with. In the meantime I've got hold of an other machine, and did a successful build: Review for release 3.fc9: * RPM name is OK * Builds fine in mock Aurelien, there's one small rpmlint warning: cryptopp.src: W: strange-permission cryptopp-remove-patented-code.sh 0775 This package is APPROVED, don't forget to fix that warning when checking in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 08:05:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466829] Review Request: openalchemist - reflexion game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250805.m9P85Jxw019751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466829 --- Comment #17 from Alexey Torkhov 2008-10-25 04:05:18 EDT --- Xavier, one more thought. Shouldn't it have in .desktop file Categories=Game;LogicGame;BlocksGame (i.e. add BlocksGame) as it still falling blocks game? More info on how game categories selected here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-games-list/2007-March/msg00003.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 08:12:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:12:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468491] New: Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Summary: Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-connect.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-connect-22-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Connect activity implements the game of Connect-4 as a two-player game. Additional participants can watch the game, and will have a chance to play the winner of the current game. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=902414 [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-connect-22-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-connect.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-connect-22-1.fc10.src.rpm sugar-connect.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 08:23:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250823.m9P8NEm0016723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #1 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-25 04:23:13 EDT --- http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-remote.spec http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/vdr-remote-0.4.0-4.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Oct 25 2008 Ville Skytt? - 0.4.0-4 - Use ATTRS, not SYSFS in example udev rules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 09:03:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250903.m9P93uXA023512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|pbrobinson at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 09:20:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 05:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810250920.m9P9K0o3026324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #12 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-25 05:19:59 EDT --- looks good to me, final word is for Mamoru. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 10:37:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251037.m9PAbvJm007236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-25 06:37:56 EDT --- rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 10:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251037.m9PAbsHf007205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-25 06:37:53 EDT --- rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 10:42:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 06:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251042.m9PAgNGe008029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 06:42:22 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-main.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 11:04:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:04:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251104.m9PB4k66011346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 07:04:45 EDT --- The setup.rb isn't part of the markaby package; it's sort of a Makefile, shared between numerous projects. It doesn't indicate the rest of the gem's license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 11:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251120.m9PBKUp8020802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 07:20:30 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-pervasives.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 11:17:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251117.m9PBHGEo020081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 07:17:16 EDT --- Oh, you're right.. the spec file should have been 0.9.0-2... New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 11:24:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251124.m9PBOQm2014508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 07:24:25 EDT --- Fixed license: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-picnic.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 11:26:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251126.m9PBQC2c015053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 07:26:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-reststop Short Description: Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 12:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 08:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251259.m9PCxSlp031488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #6 from vivek shah 2008-10-25 08:59:26 EDT --- Please review the above mentioned SPEC and SRPM which have been updated based upon the suggestions submitted as part of the earlier package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 13:28:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251328.m9PDSPaJ011019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #14 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-25 09:28:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Everything looks good but removing the .prov file. If you think it should go > in redhat-rpm-config or whatever, we should get it there first before taking it > out here. Please submit it to redhat-rpm-config then, I'd prefer if you do it, since redhat-rpm-config are not very responsive to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 13:35:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251335.m9PDZAN7005279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #7 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-25 09:35:09 EDT --- I think that the makefile don't respects the CFLAGS then because your spec is not compiling with the flags, look at this sample command-line: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -pthread -I/usr/include/readline/ -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -pthread -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I../include -DPKGLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib64/gnurobots\" -DABS_TOP_BUILDDIR=\"/home/bogado/rpmbuild/BUILD/gnurobots-1.2.0\" -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/gnurobots\" -DMAPS_PATH=\"/usr/share/gnurobots/maps\" -DSCRIPTS_PATH=\"/usr/share/gnurobots/scheme\" -pedantic-errors -Werror -Wall -g -MT map.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/map.Tpo -c -o map.o map.c The following flags (evaluated in my fedora 9 box) should show : $ rpm --eval %{optflags} -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic As far as I can see it this is the only thing missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:03:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251403.m9PE3YHt016539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-25 10:03:32 EDT --- For CFLAGS issue (In reply to comment #7) > I think that the makefile don't respects the CFLAGS then because your spec is > not compiling with the flags, Well, actually %configure sets CFLAGS as environment (see what %configure does by $ rpm --eval %configure). However for this package configure{,ac} resets CFLAGS environment configure.ac says: ------------------------------------------------------------ 92 AC_C_CONST 93 94 CFLAGS="-pedantic-errors -Werror -Wall -g" 95 96 dnl Done. ------------------------------------------------------------ The line 94 resets CFLAGS, which is why Fedora specific compilation flags are ignored. For this package ------------------------------------------------------------ %prep %setup -q sed -i.optflags -e '/^CFLAGS=/d' configure %build ...... ------------------------------------------------------------- will pass Fedora cflags (note: with Fedora cflags this package won't build with -Werror). By the way * "BuildRequires: guile >= 1.8 vte" are redundant because there are already "BuildRequires: guile-devel >= 1.8 vte-devel" * Please make it sure that all directories which are created when installing this package are correctly owned by this package. Currently the directory %_datadir/%name and some directories under this directory are not owned by any packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468515] New: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator for synthesizable verilog HDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator for synthesizable verilog HDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468515 Summary: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator for synthesizable verilog HDL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lbrooks at mit.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.680-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Verilator is the fastest free Verilog HDL simulator. It compiles synthesizable Verilog (not test-bench code!), plus some PSL, SystemVerilog and Synthesis assertions into C++ or SystemC code. It is designed for large projects where fast simulation performance is of primary concern, and is especially well suited to create executable models of CPUs for embedded software design teams. Because of systemc licensing issues, the verilator dependancies on systemc are not included with this package. This means the perl-verilog, perl-systemc, and systemc functionality that is integrated into verilator will only work if those packages are installed separately. This package, therefore, supports the verilog features of verilator (including vcd generation via the --trace option). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:08:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251408.m9PE8spS010840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-25 10:08:53 EDT --- Once again. Source0: http://downloads.sourgeforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - It's 'sourceforge', just a type... Release: 1%{?dist} - After you made any changes, please bump the release. %changelog -> rpmlint issue * Thu Oct 24 2008 Gratien D'haese - rewrote rear.spec for FedoraCore Packaging request * Tue Aug 28 2006 Schlomo Schapiro - Initial RPM Release - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs Example: * Wed Jun 14 2003 Joe Packager - 1.0-2 - Added README file (#42). ^ ^ | | This is the version --- | This is the release ------ BTW, it's only Fedora, we don't use Core anymore. I'm able to build your package but rpmlint complain about a lot of stuff... [rpm at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: non-standard-group System/Archiving The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [rpm at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint -i rear-1.7.7-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Linux-ia64.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/rear/lib/cfg2html-linux This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/GNU/Linux.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/EFI_readme.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.7/DEVELOPMENT rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_USB.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh bash The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Linux-i386.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/pack/hpasmcliOutput.txt rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/rear/verify/TSM/default/40_verify_tsm.sh This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/USB_syslinux.cfg A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Debian/ia64.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_ISO.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/rear/hpasmcliOutput.txt rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/hpasmcliOutput.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Ubuntu/7.10.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/doc/DEVELOPMENT rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/init bin/init The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_usage_PXE.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.7/README ./usr/share/rear/README The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/log/lastlog rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/Linux-x86_64.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.7/contrib ./usr/share/rear/contrib The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.7/CHANGES ./usr/share/rear/CHANGES The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/dr/hpasmcliOutput.txt rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/default.conf A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/rear/dr/GNU/Linux/95_cfg2html.sh This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/validated/SUSE_LINUX/10/i386.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/lib/nfs/state rear.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/rear/lib/mkrescue-functions.sh This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. rear.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rear/templates/RESULT_mailbody.txt A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/etc/mtab rear.noarch: W: non-standard-group System/Archiving The value of the Group tag in the package is not valid. Valid groups are: "Amusements/Games", "Amusements/Graphics", "Applications/Archiving", "Applications/Communications", "Applications/Databases", "Applications/Editors", "Applications/Emulators", "Applications/Engineering", "Applications/File", "Applications/Internet", "Applications/Multimedia", "Applications/Productivity", "Applications/Publishing", "Applications/System", "Applications/Text", "Development/Debug", "Development/Debuggers", "Development/Languages", "Development/Libraries", "Development/System", "Development/Tools", "Documentation", "System Environment/Base", "System Environment/Daemons", "System Environment/Kernel", "System Environment/Libraries", "System Environment/Shells", "User Interface/Desktops", "User Interface/X", "User Interface/X Hardware Support". rear.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog D'haese 1.7.7-1.fc9 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 12 errors, 23 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:16:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468515] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator for synthesizable verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251416.m9PEGFs0018754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468515 Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Lane 2008-10-25 10:16:14 EDT --- I created this under the wrong bugzilla account by mistake. Please delete this request as I will make the same request under the correct bugzilla account. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:20:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:20:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251420.m9PEK1ri012352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #18 from Thomas Moschny 2008-10-25 10:19:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/lmms-0.4.0-0.2.rc3.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Oct 24 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.4.0-0.2.rc3 - Add patch to fix libdir on ppc64. * Tue Oct 21 2008 Thomas Moschny <..> - 0.4.0-0.1.rc3 - Update to 0.4.0rc3. - Don't build remote_vst_plugin.exe on x86_64, but do build all other parts of the VST host there. Scratch Builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=902533 (dist-f10) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=902549 (dist-f9) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:19:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] New: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Summary: Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dirjud at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.680-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Verilator is the fastest free Verilog HDL simulator. It compiles synthesizable Verilog (not test-bench code!), plus some PSL, SystemVerilog and Synthesis assertions into C++ or SystemC code. It is designed for large projects where fast simulation performance is of primary concern, and is especially well suited to create executable models of CPUs for embedded software design teams. Because of systemc licensing issues, the verilator dependancies on systemc are not included with this package. This means the perl-verilog, perl-systemc, and systemc functionality that is integrated into verilator will only work if those packages are installed separately. This package, therefore, supports the verilog features of verilator (including vcd generation via the --trace option). This is my first Fedora package. Chitlesh Goorah will sponsor this package as it will become part of FEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:21:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251421.m9PELoFA012889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Lane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] New: Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Summary: Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/saoimage.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/saoimage-1.35.1-1.el5.src.rpm Description: SAOimage (pronounced S-A-0-image) is a utility for displaying astronomical images in the X11 window environment. It was written at the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory by Mike Van Hilst in 1990 and is now maintained by Doug Mink. Image files can be read directly, or image data may be passed through a named pipe (Unix) or a mailbox (VMS) from IRAF display tasks. SAOimage provides a large selection of options for zooming, panning, scaling, coloring, pixel readback, display blinking, and region specification. User interactions are generally performed with the mouse. Mouse tracking in an image's world coordinate system, usually sky coordinates, was added in 1994. You can also plot catalogs over images with WCS information in their headers. The SAOimage desktop includes, a main image display window, a button menu panel, a display magnifier, a pan and zoom reference image, and a color bar. A color table graph window can be brought up by clicking on the color bar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251432.m9PEW5Kw020653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-25 10:32:04 EDT --- Last time I checked it build fine in el5 mock an RPMlint was silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 14:56:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 10:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251456.m9PEulFc017348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #9 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-25 10:56:46 EDT --- > will pass Fedora cflags (note: with Fedora cflags this package won't > build with -Werror). I don't think that -Werror will be missed, the program already compiles without any warnings already, also the program was already being compiled with -Wall before so no new warning should be presented(*). *) this is not always true, sometime different optimizations level give a different set of warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:05:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251505.m9PF5IhI025435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-25 11:05:17 EDT --- Oops, one note: * Man file - Please move man.1 to %_mandir/ja/man1. (Maybe %lang(ja) is preferable). ( This package (sl) is APPROVED by mtasaka ) (@@@) ( ) (@@@@) ( ) ++ +------ ____ ____________________ || |+-+ | | \@@@@@@@@@@@ | ___ ___ Help!__ | /---------|(O) | | \@@@@@@@@@@@@@_ | (O) |_| \O/ |_| | + ======== +-+ | | | |__________________| _|--/~\------/~\-+ |__________________| |__________________| //// \O========O/ (O) (O) (O) (O) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:11:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251511.m9PFBRI6026431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-25 11:11:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gstreamer-java Short Description: Java interface to the gstreamer framework Owners: lfarkas Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: lfarkas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251523.m9PFNbXp021174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 David Walluck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from David Walluck 2008-10-25 11:23:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hamcrest Short Description: Hamcrest matcher object framework Owners: dwalluck Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:31:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251531.m9PFVYo8022282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walters at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Colin Walters 2008-10-25 11:31:33 EDT --- rpmlint is clean (modulo unused Group: bit), spec file is consistent. Looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:41:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251541.m9PFfwJF023683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|debarshi.ray at gmail.com |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-25 11:41:57 EDT --- @ Debarshi: Sorry for "stealing" your review, but I promised to finish John's pre-review for educational purposes before I sponsor him. I hope you don't mind. @ John: Sorry I missed your review because you CC'ed me after you did it. Most things look good so far, nevertheless here is a complete re-review. Here we co REVIEW FOR 180523f1a837f61076563cef5929f72d zsync-0.5-1.fc9.src.rpm FIX - MUST: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/zsync-* zsync.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/zsync-0.5/README 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Although this is minor please fix with iconv as John said in comment #1 OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec FIX - MUST: The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines - the package builds against the zlib in the source, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries - The timestamp of the source is no preserved, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - NEWS is missing from %doc OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license (Artistic License v2) and meets the Licensing Guidelines FIX - MUST: The License field in the package spec file does not match the actual license. Should be "Artistic 2.0+" instead of "Artistic clarified" (+ comes from the "or any later version..."-statement in the headers of the sources) OK - MUST: The source package includes the text of the license in its own file, and it is included in %doc OK - MUST: The spec file is written in American English OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source by md5sum 08beaf3fa95f16d8a2db2f7f3ea21196 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 OK - MUST: The package has no known ExcludeArches OK - MUST: No build dependencies except for those from the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: No locales that need to be handled with %find_lang OK - MUST: No shared library files in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, no need to call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - MUST: The package is not designed to be relocatable OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (only %{_docdir}/zsync-0.5) OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly, %files section includes a %defattr(...) line OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT FIX - MUST: The package does not consistently use macros. Use http://zsync.moria.org.uk/download/zsync-%{version}.tar.bz2 as SourceURL because then you only need to change the version tag on updates OK - MUST: The package contains code, no permissable content OK - MUST: No large documentation files for a -doc subpackage OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application OK - MUST: No header files that need to be in a -devel package OK - MUST: No static libraries that need a -static package OK - MUST: Packages does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files must, no need to require pkgconfig OK - MUST: The Package does not contain any .la libtool archives OK - MUST: No GUI application, no need for a %{name}.desktop file OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK - MUST: The package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install OK - MUST: All filenames in the package are be valid UTF-8 OK - SHOULD: The package builds in mock OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described OK - SHOULD: The package contains the latest stable release of the application NEEWSWORK Please fix all issued and then I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:44:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251544.m9PFiqxi030740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |otaylor at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Owen Taylor 2008-10-25 11:44:52 EDT --- Taking review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 15:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251547.m9PFlHDD031330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-25 11:47:14 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR as I will sponsor John. Also re-adding the fedora?cvs? flag. John, please follow the instructions from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 16:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251600.m9PG09cJ000990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cgoorah at yahoo.com.au --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-10-25 12:00:08 EDT --- I will do the review and sponsoring :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 16:36:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251636.m9PGaJ6j031787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-10-25 12:36:18 EDT --- #001: Release: 2%{?dist} This requires that first - first, for the version 3.680, this is the first src.rpm, thus your Release should be 1 and not 2. . Release: 1%{?dist} - second, every changelog entry should entail the version-release tag Here is how your changelog should be: * Thu Oct 16 2008 Lane Brooks - 3.680-1 - Initial package based on SUSE packages from Guenter Dannoritzer For more info : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs You have noticed that I have set your email address to: "lane [AT] brooks DOT nu". This is to limit unwanted spam to your email address. #002: Licensing: With Fedora's strict packaging policies, all spec files should entail the exact license and its version. In your case it will be: License: GPLv2 For more info: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing #003: Replace tabs with spaces Line 6 in your spec file : Group: Applications/Engineering #004: This line should be removed, as your name is already listed in the changelogs Packager: Lane Brooks #005: Referencing the SourceX: All the SourceX: tag should have their complete urls: For more info: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL #006: Remove Autoreqprov: On #007: Build requires Exceptions In accordance to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions, you can safely remove the following buildrequires: BuildRequires: gcc, gcc-c++ #008: Add a "-q" to the following: %setup -n %{name}-%{version} #009: Use macros as much as you can in your spec file: /usr/share/ --> %{_datadir} ./configure --> %configure /usr --> %{_prefix} cp -> %{__cp} rm -> %{__rm} for more info: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros #010: Keep timestamps use -p with %{__cp} such as %{__cp} -pr Please take some time reading the fedora packaging guidelines again and update the actual spec file. Everytime you update and publish a new spec file, don't forget to increment the Release tag and update the changelog. Once you have updated the above issues, I will dig in-depth about verilator's compilation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 16:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 12:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251652.m9PGqiQN001609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-25 12:52:43 EDT --- I am adding two scripts to help a user to use parprouted. parprouted-up.sh and parprouted-down.sh Since parprouted does not support dhcp and is intended to be used for wireless networks, I think it is better not to try to start a service automatically. Also, I did not understand what you mean by "permissions" problems, because all files in the resulting rpm have the correct permissions. I thought you were meaning, maybe, the permissions of the files in the .src.rpm, but these will change when built using koji, anyaway. Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/parprouted.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/parprouted-0.70-3.fc8.src.rpm Any additional comment is really welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251702.m9PH21PE003213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 --- Comment #2 from Owen Taylor 2008-10-25 13:02:00 EDT --- Look pretty good. - Some minor specfile issues - License doesn't match contents - Fails in mock because of autogen.sh usage See details below. Also would suggest Summary and Description would be better if the word "Metadata" was removed from each (no replacement necessary.) [*] OK or not applicable [X] Problem [-] Not checked Musts ====== [*] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint gobject-introspection.spec gobject-introspection.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 6) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Looks clean. [*] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . [*] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . [X] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . I would suggest using the python_sitelib magic from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python %install is supposed to remove the buildroot first - see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines [*] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [X] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The license tag for the package is LGPLv2+, the COPYING file in gobject-introspection is GPL3, some of the source files are GPLv2+, some LGPLv2+. [*] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. (See above) [*] The spec file must be written in American English. [*] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). [X] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SVN snapshot, which is OK, but source URL is a weird non-real URL Source0: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gobject-introspection/gobject-introspection-%{version}-20081023-r801.tar.gz http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL has some suggestion [*] The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [*] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [*] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. [*] Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [*] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [*] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. [*] A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [*] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [*] Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [*] Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) [*] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [*] Header files must be in a -devel package. [*] Static libraries must be in a -static package. [*] Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [*] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [*] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [*] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [X] At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. See above [*] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Should ====== [*] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [*] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [X] The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. Spec file runs autogen.sh which requires gnome-common, which is not in BuildRequires. (And presumably many other packages like autoconf, gnome-common is just the first one.) autogen.sh should not be necessary for a 'make distcheck' output? [-] The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-] The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [*] If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [*] Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [*] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [*] If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Please see File Dependencies in the Guidelines for further information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:11:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251711.m9PHBsSw004697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Owen Taylor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Owen Taylor 2008-10-25 13:11:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: reinteract Short Description: Interactive Python shell Owners: otaylor Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251734.m9PHYQPB013994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |vpivaini at cs.helsinki.fi --- Comment #2 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2008-10-25 13:34:25 EDT --- I'll take the review, it'll be my first review, though, but this isn't that different from any of the VDR plugins already in Fedora. I've only taken a quick look at this now, I'll need to spend some time going through all the guidelines a bit later. I'm not quite happy with how the patches are handled now. You take the "combined" Debian patch and then use patch "manually" instead of using %patch. In Fedora 10 %patch doesn't allow any fuzz, but with your current solution the patches in debian/ need fuzz and they are still applied. It'd be better if you separated the needed patches from the debian patchset and applied those with %patchN. The patches would also need to be modified to not need any fuzz. Do you know what's the upstream status of these patches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:36:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251736.m9PHa6Mq008084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 17:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 13:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251756.m9PHuUrc011133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-25 13:56:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321519) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321519) Comment for Patch2 Some notes for 1.35.1-1: * License - Well as far as I checked the whole code I only find codes under * license written in "COPYING" (Copyright only) * LGPLv2+ (e.g. fitsfile.c) So the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". Also add some files to %doc which indicates LGPL license. * Source origin - Would you write where you obtained %SOURCE3? * About saoimage-1.35.1-mkstemp.patch - See attached. * BuildRequires - In your srpm "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" is missing (while the spec file on the URL you posted here has it) * %install script - What is the line below for? ------------------------------------------------------------- install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/dev ------------------------------------------------------------- * XML file - I guess this should be installed under %_datadir/mime/packages * Directory ownership issue - The directory %_datadir/mime must not be owned by this package. By the way: [tasaka1 at localhost saoimage]$ gdb saoimage GNU gdb Fedora (6.8-15.fc10) Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/saoimage open error: No such file or directory ERROR: unable to open /dev/imt1o Error: No remote input possible. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory image utility SAOimage 1.35.1 1 December 2003, Doug Mink, dmink at cfa.harvard.edu Reserved 512 x 512 image data buffer. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0807bf89 in init_window_basics (border_pixel=0) at wndwinit.c:201 201 (void)XDestroyImage(ximage); Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install libXau.i386 libXcursor.i386 libXdmcp.i386 libXfixes.i386 libXrender.i386 (gdb) thread apply all bt (gdb) bt #0 0x0807bf89 in init_window_basics (border_pixel=0) at wndwinit.c:201 #1 0x0807bfd1 in init_windows2 () at wndwinit.c:97 #2 0x0806bded in init_packages (argc=1, argv=0xbffff3e4) at maininit.c:206 #3 0x0806bf44 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff3e4) at maininit.c:118 (gdb) qui The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y [tasaka1 at localhost saoimage]$ exit -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:03:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251803.m9PI3OtT012053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: saoimage - |Review Request: saoimage - |Utility for displaying |Utility for displaying |astronomical images |astronomical images -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:04:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251804.m9PI4AsZ012126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Summary|Review Request: biniax - An |Review Request: biniax - A |unique arcade logic game |unique arcade logic game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:02:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Package Review: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251802.m9PI2cuZ018401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-25 14:02:37 EDT --- By the way it may be good to check implicit function declaration by adding -Werror-implicit-function-declaration: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-March/msg02036.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:22:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251822.m9PIM8Ed021456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-25 14:22:06 EDT --- Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax-1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Little, cosmetic changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:29:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468539] New: Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Summary: Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sebastian at when.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox.spec SRPM URL: http://sdz.fedorapeople.org/rpmbuild/sugar-jukebox-3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The jukebox activity is an audio/video player that will play different kind of files bases on the installed gstreamer plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251827.m9PIRUvt022224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-25 14:27:29 EDT --- I don't know the upstream status of the patches. The only one of them that contains any fuzz is the "constness" patch which is pretty much cosmetic and can in principle be dropped if the fuzz makes people nervous. Others just have some line offsets. Note that even if the F-10 rpmbuild rejects fuzz by default, packagers can override that on will for the whole package or selectively on per patch basis. The way the patching is currently set up is least work for me and least work when tracking/verifying patch origin, and I've verified that despite the line offsets and bit of fuzz in one patch, they do the right thing and I'm committed to verifying that in future as well. Due to the way Debian patchkits are organized, if one wants to use them, not everything can be done with %patch. The initial patchkit can be applied with that, but it contains other patches inside it for which the only option is to use plain "patch". If recreating the patches from scratch and thus disconnecting them from their origin is a requirement for this package to pass review, I'll do it, but I don't see any real benefits in doing so, just some more work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:32:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251832.m9PIWQDA016620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #28 from John Anderson 2008-10-25 14:32:25 EDT --- Thanks for the sponsorship! I've applied to the packager group as janderson. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:43:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251843.m9PIhUk0018367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 --- Comment #29 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-25 14:43:29 EDT --- Ok, I see you already did that 6 weeks ago and I have picked up your request now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:42:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251842.m9PIgC8H024512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-25 14:42:11 EDT --- I tag this review as informal-only because I did only a few complete reviews in the past. Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [?] devel/i386 [?] devel/x86_64 [x] F9/i386 [?] F9/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [rpm at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i libgksu-2.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [rpm at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgksu-* libgksu.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gksu.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 7c272508b3608071406f8ea46769423cefc2b4a9bfa8f84206af14bec2551da5 libgksu-2.0.7.tar.gz Build source: 7c272508b3608071406f8ea46769423cefc2b4a9bfa8f84206af14bec2551da5 libgksu-2.0.7.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] The spec file handles locales properly. You added 'BuildRequires: gettext-devel' acc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files 'BR: gettext' is sufficient [x] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [x] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. - 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: [x] F9 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=902871 [x] F10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=902906 [-] devel [?] Package functions as described (no hardware to test with). [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 18:52:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 14:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251852.m9PIqsOU026094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-25 14:52:53 EDT --- I just sent mail to upstream and the Debian patchkit author asking for status of the patches in it. The i18ndetect patch is currently Fedora specific and non-upstreamable; upstream vdr does not have the *.pc file nor a -config script and I don't know a better upstreamable way of doing what it does so that it'd continue to work on Fedora. Will add a comment to the specfile about this in the next package revision. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 19:07:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251907.m9PJ7hZS028655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-25 15:07:42 EDT --- The .desktop file is in the wrong package. I think that a better place is gksu (#468467), or am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 19:11:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251911.m9PJBZ3m023110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-25 15:11:34 EDT --- Just a small comment on your spec file. 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 19:37:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251937.m9PJbxKl026662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #9 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-25 15:37:58 EDT --- Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/biniax-1.2-4.fc10.src.rpm - Add datadir prefix, snd.patch and gfx.patch - Remove obsolete desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 19:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - An unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810251948.m9PJm3FA001805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Summary|Review Request: biniax - A |Review Request: biniax - An |unique arcade logic game |unique arcade logic game Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-25 15:48:02 EDT --- This "MUST"-Checklist is from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines --------------------------------------------------------- MUST Items: - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. + rpmlint is silence - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + OK No md5sum list on homepage of biniax 12bca4b9b8354519edbdf89faa3c328b biniax-src.zip cassmodiah 12bca4b9b8354519edbdf89faa3c328b biniax-src.zip CheekyBoinc - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + OK - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 + OK -> short run-test on x86 (cassmodiah) / N/A -> no run-test on x64 + OK -> no run-test on ppc (cheekyboinc) / N/A -> no run-test on ppc64 +OK build on all architectures http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903139 - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. +OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. / N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: / N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. + OK - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. + OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) / N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. / N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). / N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} / N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. + OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. +OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. + OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. + OK -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- LAST BUT NOT LEAST: +-------------------+ | | | BINIAX APPROVED | | | +-------------------+ Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 20:03:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252003.m9PK3JVV004036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: biniax - An |Review Request: biniax - A |unique arcade logic game |unique arcade logic game -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 20:17:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252017.m9PKHpmD032522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-25 16:17:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: biniax Short Description: a unique arcade logic game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 20:27:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252027.m9PKRX2X007872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 --- Comment #12 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-25 16:27:32 EDT --- No need for early F-10 so.... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: biniax Short Description: a unique arcade logic game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 20:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] New: Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Summary: Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Barrage is a rather violent action game with the objective to kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes. The player controls a gun that may either fire small or large grenades at soldiers, jeeps and tanks. It is a very simple gameplay though it is not that easy to get high scores. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 20:42:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226295] Merge Review: php-pear In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252042.m9PKgSNA009995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226295 Christopher Stone changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468255 Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 21:43:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:43:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] New: Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix-2.5.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: CGI Multipart EOF fix for mongrel rpmlint silent koji scratch builds - f8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903209 - f9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903211 - f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903213 - f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903214 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 21:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468466] Review Request: libgksu - Simple API for su and sudo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252154.m9PLsY9x014202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468466 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-25 17:54:33 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/libgksu-2.0.7/libgksu-2.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [rpm at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i libgksu-2.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [rpm at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgksu-* libgksu.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gksu.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454208#c4 - We regards GConf schemas files as _not_ a configuration file so please remove %config(noreplace) attribution on GConf schemas file (even if rpmlint warns about it) [!] The spec file handles locales properly. You added 'BuildRequires: gettext-devel' acc. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files 'BR: gettext' is sufficient fixed [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. - 'desktop-file-install --vendor="fedora" \' is obsolete for new packages. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/DesktopFileVendor fixed The .desktop file is in the wrong package. I think that a better place is gksu (#468467), or am I wrong? gksu is just the frontend and the desktopfile links to the wizard application that set the properties of the API, or am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:00:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252200.m9PM0Tva015499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 21:59:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252159.m9PLxMqZ014951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-25 17:59:20 EDT --- you forgot a little thing :-) %post touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi %postun touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor if [ -x %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache ] ; then %{_bindir}/gtk-update-icon-cache --quiet %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor || : fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:45:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252245.m9PMjNSJ021703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 18:45:22 EDT --- the license was fixed, so package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:44:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252244.m9PMixTq026783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 18:44:59 EDT --- The license was fixed, so package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:46:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:46:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252246.m9PMkiA8021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:46:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252246.m9PMkY41021805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 22:59:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 18:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252259.m9PMxsO3023216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 18:59:54 EDT --- license fixed, package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252300.m9PN074N023548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:01:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 310631] Review Request: wmnd - A network monitoring dock app for WindowMaker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252301.m9PN11P8023777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310631 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(sfernand at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Patrice Dumas 2008-10-25 19:01:00 EDT --- Closing, it has been a very long time without activity. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:07:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252307.m9PN7Fno024515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 19:07:14 EDT --- License tag is wrong. I should be Dual license Ruby/MIT %doc tag is fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252332.m9PNW4je027650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roma at lcg.ufrj.br --- Comment #1 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-25 19:32:03 EDT --- Hi, this package produces two rpms. The first contains only the documentation, with a single file: cddlibman.dvi I think this dvi file should be converted to a pdf file, so people can read it with any pdf reader installed on the system. The second rpm is the devel rpm, and contains 7 .h and 2 .a files (static libraries). You did the right thing, putting these files in a devel package. However, you suppressed the generation of the examples in the spec file, but I think they are important for the users. When I generated the examples, I saw that they were installed in /usr/bin and that they were quite a few files (26). I would suggest installing the examples in the main package, in a directory examples, which can be part of the documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:40:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252340.m9PNeNOB028891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-25 19:40:22 EDT --- I made another review, but this one required some modifications in the spec file, because the packager suppressed the generation of the examples. In my opinion, examples should always be supplied, unless there is a good reason for not packaging them. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:40:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:40:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252340.m9PNeuJ3001542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #2 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-25 19:40:55 EDT --- All that should be in -devel, even the doc and the examples, if they aren't too big in size. Main package shouldn't contain just one doc file, it's counter-intuitive (to me). You can simply not produce the main package (by omitting its %files section) and put the doc in -doc subpackage if you must. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:47:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252347.m9PNlG6s029690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-25 19:47:15 EDT --- Example binaries shouldn't be in documentation! The source for them is already there (IIRC) or if not can be added there. Maybe they can be placed in %libexec if they are helpful, but I thought the source would be helpful, while the binaries would not be. But I will take all the other suggestions for the next spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252354.m9PNsYNT003031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 19:54:33 EDT --- ok, in that case the package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:55:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252355.m9PNtDF7003370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:56:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252356.m9PNugWx003550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 19:56:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-main Short Description: A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Oct 25 23:58:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 19:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: libGPP4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810252358.m9PNwg13003665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #15 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-25 19:58:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > By the way rebuild fails on ppc64: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=901509 Patched and fixed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903353 I also changed the naming to gpp4 and gpp4-devel, I'll do the same with: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec updated srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-9.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260005.m9Q05p6H032141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:05:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-pervasives Short Description: Access to pristine object state Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:04:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260004.m9Q04cWg031630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:04:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-picnic Short Description: Easier distribution of Camping based applications Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:08:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260008.m9Q08NiD005130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:08:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-markaby Short Description: Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260007.m9Q07l2L005068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-25 20:07:47 EDT --- Here are some of the examples created: /usr/bin/testlp2_gmp /usr/bin/testlp3 /usr/bin/testlp3_gmp /usr/bin/testshoot /usr/bin/testshoot_gmp It seems to me that this package requires gmp. The README advises to use gmp for getting accurate results. "Whenever the time is not important, it is safer to use gmp rational arithmetic." In the doc directory there is already a pdf version of the documentation. All the example sources are in the directory src. At least these sources should be in the documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260012.m9Q0CSlw005794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:12:27 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260016.m9Q0GaqS006421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #19 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-25 20:16:34 EDT --- Changed naming from libmmdb to mmdb (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 and discussion therein). new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/mmdb-1.09.1-9.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:24:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260024.m9Q0OkZo001877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:21:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] New: Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-facets.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-facets-2.4.5-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Description: The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. rpmlint silent koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903373 - dist-f9-updates-candidate:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903375 - dist-f10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903377 - dist-f11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=903379 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:25:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461454] Review Request: lordsawar - Turn-based strategy game in a fantasy setting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260025.m9Q0P4d8007532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461454 --- Comment #11 from Ian Weller 2008-10-25 20:25:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lordsawar/0.1.3-1/lordsawar.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/lordsawar/0.1.3-1/lordsawar-0.1.3-1.fc9.src.rpm * Sat Oct 25 2008 Ian Weller 0.1.3-1 - Updated upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260024.m9Q0O7Rg007181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:28:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435017] Review Request: SSM - coordinate superposition library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260028.m9Q0Shoe007796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017 --- Comment #10 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-25 20:28:42 EDT --- Changed naming from libssm to ssm (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 and discussion therein). new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm.spec new srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/ssm-0.1-8.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260034.m9Q0YigL003178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:34:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260034.m9Q0YVFw008484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #6 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 20:34:30 EDT --- ok, license also fixed. Package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:44:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260044.m9Q0ilcJ009839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #1 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 20:44:46 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: Ruby Actual License: Ruby %doc License: COPYING (see below) Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 0f8e1d2889411d04ca7726324eef8a4c) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - F-11: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok COPYING,AUTHORS,CHANGES,MANIFEST,README,RELEASE,VERSION not marked as %doc otherwise the package is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:51:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260051.m9Q0pk3L010935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:51:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mocha Short Description: Mocking and stubbing library Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:58:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260058.m9Q0wbJC006276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #3 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 20:58:36 EDT --- ok, fixed the %doc files, so package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260056.m9Q0uMxJ006192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 20:56:21 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-facets.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:56:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260056.m9Q0uOhB006210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 --- Comment #1 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 20:56:23 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: Ruby Actual License: GPL with addendums, not sure which version though %doc License: COPYING (see below) Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 0f8e1d2889411d04ca7726324eef8a4c) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - F-11: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok CHANGELOG,LICENSE,README not marked as %doc The license is a bit unclear, from the LICENSE file it's GPL with addendums, but which version of the GPL is unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:59:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:59:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260059.m9Q0xON9011649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:58:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260058.m9Q0wlwB011586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 00:59:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 20:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260059.m9Q0xSex011683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:02:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260102.m9Q126Vp012354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 21:02:05 EDT --- License is the same as rubygem-mongrel New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix-2.5.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:14:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260114.m9Q1EpNL008496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] New: Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Summary: Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://basket.kde.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: hdegoede at redhat.com ReportedBy: quantumburnz at hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 177841 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pAo4InJN4FWu1IzlQB6yUvQm7JvNpms4NZDXkABcx_RSFY6vEdJLKu-MDLuWF3o5yVEc1T6HKN477JS3gj1cq9w/basket.spec?download SRPM URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1ppmMFYmBd4iz_vpMzmFNihbd6LSN58WKwgQUEy24pY9qrQsZtxUDts4i0MrQsxuljvbArhv0pTPU/basket-1.0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm?download Description: Taking care of your ideas. A note-taking application that makes it easy to write down ideas as you think, and quickly find them back later. Organizing your notes has never been so easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:14:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260114.m9Q1Ecbs013827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 --- Comment #3 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-25 21:14:37 EDT --- ok, this belongs with mongrel, and the website states it as a Ruby license so that's ok. %doc files are fixed, so package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:14:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260114.m9Q1EmxE013856@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:16:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260116.m9Q1GLkF014367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:16:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260116.m9Q1GaLs014404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 21:16:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix Short Description: CGI Multipart EOF fix for mongrel Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:16:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260116.m9Q1GpU8009054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260118.m9Q1IDM3014570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:28:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260128.m9Q1SaJ2015889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-25 21:28:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-facets Short Description: The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 01:38:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 21:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260138.m9Q1cjas017329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-25 21:38:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > ... > It seems to me that this package requires gmp. This builds one library that uses gmp and one that doesn't. I'm not terribly familiar with the use of the library so I felt it was best to include both options; I would appreciate input from anyone who is more informed. > In the doc directory there is already a pdf version of > the documentation. You prefer pdf to dvi? They are both supposed to be portable printable formats, but I'm not sure which we prefer in Fedora. > All the example sources are in the directory src. > At least these sources should be in the documentation. OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 02:00:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 22:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260200.m9Q20seE020534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #3 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-25 22:00:53 EDT --- Actually, generally speaking, there is no rule saying that the first release submitted in Fedora must be "1". 2 is just fine. One might have done/used some previous testing specs before the one submitted. Or it might be a new version of a rpm already in use from another source. I am looking forward to see this package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 03:04:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:04:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260304.m9Q34L3A022812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-25 23:04:19 EDT --- updated. http://ispbrasil.com.br/ifstat/ifstat.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/ifstat/ifstat-1.1-1.7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 03:06:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260306.m9Q36Sp5023394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |parprouted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 03:40:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260340.m9Q3epCK000644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Summary|Review Request: basket - |Review Request: basket - |Taking care of your ideas. |Taking care of your ideas --- Comment #1 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-25 23:40:50 EDT --- I had to make a couple changes so here are new URLs: Spec URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1phVJHr_dSr1gMt0-rHuTVAAUTrX26o8YAnkwqvlxzL4LOLRUxKl5GDl8ohc8QJL15RsU9md2O_PPWC_7Hv5uNOg/basket.spec?download SRPM URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pShllREhh39cP2V-sNezg4d6KwykdOHLVDBpDfaDdJDNACluD0spLx3PSi7-UQiwHzprAM7W-fxo/basket-1.0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm?download Output of rpmlint: basket.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 29, tab: line 5) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ^^^ Ignoring this one because it's just complaining about my formatting. basket.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/basket-1.0.3.1/AUTHORS basket.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbasketcommon.so libbasketcommon.so 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. ^^^ Ignoring the first warning because the authors name has a ? and a ? in it. I'm not sure what to do about the second error. Is there even a way I can fix that or is it an upstream problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 04:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] New: Review Request: webmin - new package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webmin - new package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 Summary: Review Request: webmin - new package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andy at gohanman.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SPECS/python-sybase.spec SRPM URL: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/webmin-1.430-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: webmin is perl-based web application for managing various hardware and services. The upstream version is designed to keep all files within a single directory in /usr/libexec (and there doesn't seem to be much interest in changing that). I'm shifting a lot of files over into /usr/share/webmin and sym-linking back into libexec as needed. The bash scripts to do this (and fix up what should & shouldn't have the executable bit set) take awhile to run, but should be flexible enough to work with new upstream releases with little or no modification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 04:37:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 00:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260437.m9Q4bFmm003227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #16 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-26 00:37:13 EDT --- Revision w/o easy-install.pth: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/python-sybase-0.39-6.fc9.src.rpm I have what seems like a pretty clean webmin package @ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 08:38:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260838.m9Q8cvF1010498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Aurelien Bompard 2008-10-26 04:38:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cryptopp Short Description: Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes Owners: abompard Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 08:43:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 04:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260843.m9Q8hnVC011335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2008-10-26 04:43:48 EDT --- Hello, Sorry about that, but the spec file I uploaded was completely bogus: don't bother officially reviewing the package at this stage :(. I have modified the spec file to create a jar file and install that, rather than installing all the .class files everywhere. Unfortunately my examination of the package has shown more problems than just .class files. Problem: Flexdock depends on several other libraries: *Java media framework http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/media/jmf/ ./lib/jmf/lib/jmf.jar ./lib/jmf/lib/mediaplayer.jar ./lib/jmf/lib/multiplayer.jar ./lib/jmf/lib/customizer.jar -- *"Looks" project https://looks.dev.java.net/ ./lib/looks-2.1.1.jar *skinlf "Skin look and Feel" project https://skinlf.dev.java.net/ ./lib/skinlf.jar Each of which don't appear to have fedora packages at this stage. Unless I am allowed to use the .jar files supplied with flexdock, flexdock cannot build. I have uploaded the new .spec file in case anyone has any comments. Note that the ant-jmf seems to cause a build failure, and thus cannot be used: compile: [javac] Compiling 229 source files to /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/flexdock-0.5.1/build/bin [javac] Note: Some input files use or override a deprecated API. [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details. [javac] Compiling 29 source files to /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/flexdock-0.5.1/build/bin-demo [javac] /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/flexdock-0.5.1/src/java/demo/org/flexdock/demos/raw/jmf/MediaPanel.java:21: package javax.media does not exist [javac] import javax.media.ControllerEvent; [javac] ^ Am I supposed to now create packages for each of the missing deps? If someone can tell me what I am supposed to do now, that would be great! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 09:32:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260932.m9Q9WkkB014180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 05:32:45 EDT --- Well, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software Removing all pre-compiled .jar files (.class files etc) at %prep is _mandatory_ on Fedora to make it sure that all files are correctly built from FOSS file. If this package needs some external jar files you must package them in advance (example: bug 428798 , especially the discussion from bug 428798 comment 11 ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 09:44:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260944.m9Q9ivhg021249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Marc Bradshaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-10-26 05:44:55 EDT --- Thankyou Mamoru. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sl Short Description: Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' Owners: deebs Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 09:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 05:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810260950.m9Q9odFq017370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 Andrea Musuruane changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |musuruan at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Andrea Musuruane 2008-10-26 05:50:38 EDT --- I had just a quick look at the spec file. It seems some things are missing. For example there is no GTK+ GUI and no i18n support. You may also want to read this thread where there is another spec file for Fedora: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=45988 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261000.m9QA03PC024034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #8 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-26 06:00:03 EDT --- * You still need to add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils * I think the iconv line belongs to %prep * The version in the two first lines in %changelog is wrong, it should be 8200 * The sentence in %description still begins with a lower case letter. About the version, I would follow upstream convention. There are other packages with high version numbers (e.g. xterm is 236) About the menus, I don't think is possible/convenient to modify the menu layout. Users can change it using applications (for example, alacarte). Anyway, I will ask in the packagers list -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:06:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261006.m9QA6Wuf025257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2008-10-26 06:06:31 EDT --- Sorry about the dup, forgot the JMF FAQ link: http://java.sun.com/javase/technologies/desktop/media/jmf/reference/faqs/index.html#jmfsource -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:05:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261005.m9QA5phe025064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2008-10-26 06:05:50 EDT --- Looks like this might be dead in the water. Unless this is out of date, the JMF is available under the "Sun Community Source Licensing", which is not allowed in fedora per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. Might have to raise this as a bug at scilab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261027.m9QARfKc023089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2008-10-26 06:27:40 EDT --- True, but since it's his first package for fedora, I prefer that he adopts some good practices :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:41:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261041.m9QAfWrg025461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 06:41:31 EDT --- Sorry to have taken so long to look at this (actually I did some work on the subject in the background but didn't trace it in bugzilla). I've talked briefly with the Perizia author on irc recently. He's set up a new web site, http://hiran.in/ and tried to do a proper sfd+ttf release for his new font, Rufscript. He was intending to clean up Perizia too in the next weeks. Please contact him and coordinate to make sure that what he ends up publishing is something you can build a great package from: ? have him publish the sfd sources so you can rebuild with our fontforge (cf inconsolata fonts package) ? have him publish a detached license file that can be put in %doc ? have him wrap it all in a versioned archive Apart from this, some review of your current submission ? you've killed a 0 in the datetime stamp. Don't do that, you need the full 20080803 stamp if you don't want problems during upgrades (alternatively if you can convince Hiran to use clean versioning in the font metadata you can use it instead of dates) ? are you sure you want to register perizia in fontconfig as sans-serif and not fantasy? (the fantasy generic is available on recent fontconfig versions) Anyway your spec is clean and readable, and the font source is clear so I'll have no problems approving it all once those points are taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:41:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261041.m9QAftxQ030669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mvaliyav at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:50:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261050.m9QAomH1027082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 06:50:47 EDT --- Also your package currently does not build Please take a look at bug #467507 to see how one performs a %setup on a single file not wrapped inside an archive (but if you can get upstream to release a proper archive the problem will go away by itself). Since Rahul and you are packaging fonts from the same author you can probably try to approach him collectively, to make sure you ask for the same things for both fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:47:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261047.m9QAlL5n031631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-26 06:47:20 EDT --- Some Issues missing DesktopFile usage (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage) Remove unusualy Categories in the desktopfile install like (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) desktop-file-install \ --remove-category="X-Red-Hat-Base;Application" \ --delete-original \ --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/%name.desktop echo Icon=barrage >> barrage.desktop use macros, because it looks better: echo Icon=%{name} >> %{name}.desktop in my opinion it is better to write a little patch to correct the categories and the missing icon of this desktopfile and just validate the desktopfile install. It's easier to handle and minimize and clear the spec-file. desktop-file-validate $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop Icons: look at comment 1 %files: you wrote: %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/* I would rather write: %{_datadir}/%{name}/ %doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL README %doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL README -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:55:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261055.m9QAtFh3000569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 10:54:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 06:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261054.m9QAslGs032683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 06:54:46 EDT --- Lastly you should not touch the fedora-review flag. Setting it to ? basically means you've committed to reviewing this package, which you can't (since you're the packager), and thus you've deadlocked your own submission. Fixing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468579] New: Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 Summary: Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/PyQuante-1.6.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: PyQuante is an open-source suite of programs for developing quantum chemistry methods. The program is written in the Python programming language, but has many "rate-determining" modules also written in C for speed. The resulting code, though not as fast as Jaguar, NWChem, Gaussian, or GAMESS, is much easier to understand and modify. The goal of this software is not necessarily to provide a working quantum chemistry program (although it will hopefully do that), but rather to provide a well-engineered set of tools so that scientists can construct their own quantum chemistry programs without going through the tedium of having to write every low-level routine. rpmlint output: PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Minimizers.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/IO/XYZ.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/GridPoint.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/qmmd.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/pyints.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/PGBF.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/MINDO3_Parameters.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/DFunctionals.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/IO/Molf.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Constants.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Basis/Tools.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Atom.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/dft.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Molecule.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/leapfrog.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/OEP.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/EN2.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Lebedev.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/fermi_dirac.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/ThomasFermi.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/MINDO3.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/pressure.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/pressure.py PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/DMP.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Bunch.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/IO/Cube.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/LA2.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Dynamics.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/IO/Jaguar.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/AnalyticDerivatives.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/AnalyticDerivatives.py PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Wavefunction.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/force.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/force.py PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/NumWrap.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/MolecularGrid.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/CGBF.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/IO/Matlab.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/CI.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Element.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/PyQuante2.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Convergence.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/NEB.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/AtomicGrid.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/DFunctionalsOld.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Slater.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Solvers.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/MP.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/HFGF.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/rys.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/hgp.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/hartree_fock.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Legendre.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/rohf.py 0644 PyQuante.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD PyQuante-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 54 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:15:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261115.m9QBFcSl003893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-26 07:15:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Remove unusualy Categories in the desktopfile install like > (http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html) > > desktop-file-install \ > --remove-category="X-Red-Hat-Base;Application" \ > --delete-original \ > --dir=%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_datadir}/applications/%name.desktop "Application" needs to be removed for it is no longer a valid category. "X-Red-Hat-Base" can remain. Categories prefixed with X- are considered as custom categories. Nevertheless "X-Red-Hat-Base" is not really needed anymore, it was used to define what apps should appear at top level once. > echo Icon=barrage >> barrage.desktop > use macros, because it looks better: > echo Icon=%{name} >> %{name}.desktop Using macros here hardly adds any value. The guidelines say one should use macros consistently, this means not to mix %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT for example, but this does not mean one necessarily needs to use macros everywhere. Regarding the icon: 48x48 would be better than 32x32. > in my opinion it is better to write a little patch to correct the categories > and the missing icon of this desktopfile and > just validate the desktopfile install. It's easier to handle and minimize and > clear the spec-file. I disagree. IMHO a patch should be avoided here, because it adds additional overhead. desktop-file-install is there for editing and installing desktop files and will also validate them. > I would rather write: > %{_datadir}/%{name}/ correct > %doc AUTHORS BUGS ChangeLog COPYING INSTALL README Remove INSTALL from %doc, it is not needed when installing from rpm and thus only adds confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:19:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261119.m9QBJT87031454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #5 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2008-10-26 07:19:28 EDT --- Since you have a plan on managing the patches, I won't consider using the debian patchkit or the offsets and fuzz a blocker for the review. I'll try to go through the packaging guidelines later today or tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261118.m9QBIRL9004274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2008-10-26 07:18:26 EDT --- The timestamp of Source0 nside the SRPM does not match SourceURL. Pleas use wget or similar to download and keep the timestamp, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:28:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261128.m9QBSLIC000329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sundaram at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 07:28:20 EDT --- 1. Since Minto Joseph and you are both packaging Hiran's fonts, you should get together and interact with Hiran collectively (see bug #457709). 2. It's not a good idea to keep the versioning in the TTF filename, some apps refer fonts by filename and will get cross with you if it changes every version 3. You should discuss with Minto if you want to adopt a common prefix for your font packages names (for example hiranv-rufscript-fonts and perizia-rufscript-fonts). We've more or less started to do it for big foundries (gfs, sil) and some individual font authors (thibault), it's probably better to generalise the convention to have consistent naming (please subscribe to the fonts SIG list if you haven't done so yet to get informed of packaging convention evolutions) 4. you can drop the -f in the fc-cache invocation for releases ? Fedora 9 ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate 5. Some people want all Fedora-added source files in a package to be prefixed with the package name. You don't follow this convention for your fontconfig file. Please take inspiration from the general packaging guidelines or Minto's package to fix it. ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate ? bug #457709 6. 69 is a bit low, for a latin font like rufscript something between 62 and 64 would be fine ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_lists 7. Please have upstream publish rufscript in a proper versioned archive with a detached license file you can add in %doc 8. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented 9. I would have declared rufscript as a cursive font, not a sans-serif one 10. Please add a "Generic name" rule in addition to the "Registering a font in default families" rule ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names This rule is used by fontconfig to complete your font with glyphs from other fonts when it encounters a codepoint your font is missing ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families This rule is used by fontconfig to identify what fonts to use when an application requests a "cursive" font. 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases (in the versionned archive you're supposed to request) Despite the long todo list your spec is in good shape overall and it should not take much to get it in a state that can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457709] Review Request: perizia-fonts - English asymmetric font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261131.m9QBVgqu006312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457709 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:31:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467507] Review Request: Rufscript-fonts - Rufscripts is a decorative handwriting based font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261131.m9QBVPnK000979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:37:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261137.m9QBbGgR007225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 07:37:15 EDT --- Setting needinfo till the requested changes are done. Please remove the flag when the next version of the spec is ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 11:57:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 07:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261157.m9QBvwun005228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 07:57:57 EDT --- Well, while I cannot find out yet where to download JMF source file itself, as far as I read the link in your comment 9 jmf cannot be included in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:29:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261229.m9QCTUl0011201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 08:29:28 EDT --- Needinfo till a package that conforms to the points listed in bug #461139 is made available -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:26:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261226.m9QCQTLX010912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 08:26:27 EDT --- I wanted to wait for a submission with a fixed name, but since I'm doing a font review run today anyway, here is a full review. (on http://subhodip.fedorapeople.org/Thabit-fonts-0.02-3.fc9.src.rpm) 1. Please rename package to arabeyes-thabit-fonts 2. You have a typo in Summary 3. Is upstream's URL http://www.arabeyes.org/ or http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot (as referenced in the README) ? 4. Is the description still ok for a Thabit-only package? 5. It's harmless, but a Source2 without Source1 is strange, especially on a new package 6. Please use normal %setup macro in your package. That will simplify the spec a lot (your complex manual unpacking was only necessary because you initially tried to stuff two fonts in a single package) 7. Since upstream uses fontforge for building, please ask upstream to publish sfd sources and build fedora fonts from those sources (we have many packages that do so, for example DejaVu, Liberation, Inconsolata, etc) 8. Some people want all Fedora-added source files in a package to be prefixed with the package name. You don't follow this convention for your fontconfig file. Please use %{name}-fontconfig.conf as suggested by http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsSpecTemplate 9. I don't know if 65 is the right fontconfig priority for this font. You need to discuss it with Behdad (preferably CC-ing the fedora fonts list) 10. Please only declare thabit-related fontconfig rules in the fontconfig file shipped with the thabit package 11. You probably want a "Generic name" rule in addition to the "Registering a font in default families" rule in your fontconfig file ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names This rule is used by fontconfig to complete your font with glyphs from other fonts when it encounters a codepoint your font is missing ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Registering_a_font_in_default_families This rule is used by fontconfig to identify what fonts to use when an application requests a "cursive" font. 12. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages 13. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases (in the versionned source archive you're supposed to request) 14. You can drop the -f flag to fc-cache for releases ? Fedora 9 15. OFL.txt mentions an IBM copyright. Please ask upstream to add a Fontlog.txt to their source release archive (as recommended by SIL for OFL fonts), that clearly identifies what other fonts were used to create this font, so Fedora Legal can check there is no problem 16. Please make sure all the steps up to 2.a (included) have been followed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle In particular we need a wiki page that describes the font to be added to the wiki (for release notes) Well that's a lot of stuff to fix and it's a pity the OLPC folks didn't do a full review before accepting this font package. I'm putting a "NEEDINFO reporter" on this bug and the Mothanna one (since it needs more or less the same fixes). Please remove this flag once you've fixed the previous points. Please don't hesitate to ask questions on the fedora fonts list if there are elements you need help with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 12:52:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 08:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261252.m9QCq90T020537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #11 from D Haley 2008-10-26 08:52:08 EDT --- This has been reported as a bug at scilab, as this package is intended to support scilab-5.0.1 http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 13:05:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261305.m9QD5Ndq017682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-26 09:05:22 EDT --- ATrpms seems to be down. This is an alternative location for downloading the files: Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/yafaray.spec SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 13:33:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261333.m9QDXLKg027419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-26 09:33:20 EDT --- I would suggest a spec file like this: Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/cddlib.spec Without "BR: gmp-devel" it does not build in mock... and for developing with cddlib, gmp-devel is also necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 13:37:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261337.m9QDbAL7022503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-26 09:37:09 EDT --- 1. Why don't you have just one patch for the fortran-related stuff? Remove commented sed line. 2. To my understanding you don't need the zlib patch, since you require zlib >= 1.2.3 (the bug is only present in zlib 1.2.2). Remove patch0. 3. Remove all rpath related stuff, matio builds fine without them. 4. Please don't delete man files - rename them all to begin with, say matio-. 5. Add requires: %if 0%{?fedora} > 8 BuildRequires: texlive-latex %else BuildRequires: tetex-latex %endif and get rid of the doxygen stuff in the spec file. 6. Move PDF to builddir and add it in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 14:06:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261406.m9QE6U3L027082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 10:06:27 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 14:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261419.m9QEJZIY028673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 10:19:34 EDT --- This package itself seems now good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 14:28:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 10:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261428.m9QESiR8003490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #5 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-26 10:28:43 EDT --- It was late yesterday :) Fixed the problems. Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage-1.0.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 15:14:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261514.m9QFE1us003699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #5 from Lane 2008-10-26 11:14:00 EDT --- I have incorporated Chitlesh's feedbackc into an updated spec file and have a new release "3" available for download from: http://www.brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec http://www.brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.680-3.fc10.src.rpm The previous release was "2" but was not documented in the changelog. I added the correct changelog entry to document releases "1", "2", and now "3". We have been using these releases at my work, thus I do not want to reset to "1" or it will cause problems for our users. I have built and tested this new release 3 on our project regression test suite at work on F10 rawhide, F8, and Centos 5.2. Lane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 15:48:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261548.m9QFmiDg008113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Summary|Review Request: libGPP4 - |Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL |LGPL CCP4 library |CCP4 library Alias|libGPP4 |gpp4 Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 11:48:42 EDT --- Some notes ? License - License tag can be okay with LGPLv2 as README file declares so, however all files under src/ directories are actually under LGPLv2+. Would you ask upstream about this? (as it is okay with LGPLv2, this is not a blocker) * Source tarball - The tarball in the srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written as %SOURCE ------------------------------------------------------ 514623 2008-06-10 05:21 gpp4-1.0.4-9.fc10.src/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz 498933 2007-09-03 00:00 orig/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz 48931781425a5b79a8255ebefaed24b3 orig/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz 7494566588545eb167b1c4c6e486cdf4 gpp4-1.0.4-9.fc10.src/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------ * Linkage error - rpmlint shows ------------------------------------------------------ gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 sincos gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 sqrt gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 rintf gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 lrint ------------------------------------------------------ For packages providing -devel subpackage these rpmlint warnings cannot be allowed because these will cause linkage error when using these libraries. I guess linking to libm.so (-lm) will remove these warnings. Note: You can use rpmlint also for installed rpms like: $ rpmlint gpp4 which will show you these warnings. * Duplicate documents - Generally there is no need to include a document file as %doc to both main and -devel packages. * Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install='install -p' ------------------------------------------------------ - This should be "INSTALL='install -p'". ? Another rpmlint issue ------------------------------------------------------ gpp4-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gpp4-devel-1.0.4/doc/latex/csym_f_page.tex ------------------------------------------------------ - Well it may be preferable to convert this file to UTF-8, however I am not sure if tex supports UTF-8 tex file (at least it is well-known that platex does not support Japanese UTF-8 tex files...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 16:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] New: Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Full-featured text search engine library $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm rubygem-ferret.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ferret-0.11.6/lib/ferret_ext.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-ferret-devel-0.11.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm rubygem-ferret-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/jmeeuwen/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/rubygem-ferret-debuginfo-0.11.6-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Seems obvious to me -devel does not need documentation separately from the base package, and I'm not sure what the no-soname is about and how to patch it given http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#no-soname and that this is a rubygem... koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904323 - dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904328 - dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904333 - dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904338 Note that the %files section uses absolute paths and no macros because for some weird reason the macros would not work -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 16:32:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261632.m9QGWCqI013838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #1 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 12:32:11 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-2.fc9.src.rpm rpmlint now silent better use of macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 16:34:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 12:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261634.m9QGY7PY020079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sahartsu at xs4all.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sahartsu at xs4all.nl Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:07:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261707.m9QH7fAv024956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-26 13:07:40 EDT --- RPM Lint: quiet Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: MIT Actual License: MIT %doc License: MIT-LICENSE file (see below) Spec file language: ok Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: 928b6f90c61593059d8668dc70ebf337) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: ok Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: ok Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok You forgot to package the MIT-LICENSE file. Please include it as a %doc. Otherwise the package is ok now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:11:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261711.m9QHBMnF019602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 13:11:21 EDT --- Crap, sorry for that. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:20:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261720.m9QHK8ub021282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 13:20:08 EDT --- I cannot approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:19:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261719.m9QHJMpT020941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 13:19:22 EDT --- First of all, this is not gem.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:18:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261718.m9QHIaot020896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 13:18:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-ferret Short Description: Full-featured text search engine library Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:16:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261716.m9QHGmYx020736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-26 13:16:46 EDT --- Final few findings: 1) *.a should be dropped from -devel or otherwise treated as guidelines suggest: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exclusion_of_Static_Libraries 2) $ desktop-file-validate openipmigui.desktop openipmigui.desktop: error: line "[Desktop Entry] " ends with a space, but looks like a group. The validation will continue, with the trailing spaces ignored. openipmigui.desktop: warning: key "Encoding" in group "Desktop Entry" is deprecated openipmigui.desktop: error: value "Application;System" for string list key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character After fixing these, there's one more: $ desktop-file-validate openipmigui.desktop openipmigui.desktop: warning: value "Application;System;" for key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value "Application" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:17:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261717.m9QHH4mb026315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 S.A. Hartsuiker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-26 13:17:03 EDT --- ok, license file included now. package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:18:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468604] New: Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468604 Summary: Review Request: echolinux - Linux echolink client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cooly at gnome.eu.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/echolinux.spec SRPM URL: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/echolinux-0.17a-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: EchoLinux is a "command line" driven engine that performs all of the actions necessary to initiate sessions, accept connections and maintain connections with other echoLink users. It also handles the compression/decompression of the audio stream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:30:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261730.m9QHUed3022759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 13:30:40 EDT --- Why do you create gem by "rake package" instead of using gem file provided by upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:39:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:39:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261739.m9QHdDVP023780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 13:39:12 EDT --- Please use "Requires: rubygem(mongrel)" instead of "Requires: rubygem-mongrel". Making rubygem rpm package have "Provides: rubygem(foo)" is for this purpose: Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:41:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261741.m9QHfOas024350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261748.m9QHm2ba025389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 13:48:01 EDT --- fixed in the spec and srpm New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix-2.5.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261753.m9QHr3Hu026084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #9 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 13:53:02 EDT --- I prefer using tarballs because they make the %doc available directly as %doc README etcetera which are then being put in /usr/share/doc/%{name}-%{version}/, rather then putting the docs in some obscure %{geminstdir} (which should hold the program, not the docs) or %{gemdir}/doc/ (which should have RDoc documentation, not READMEs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:54:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261754.m9QHskmI031228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #8 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 13:54:46 EDT --- Care to comment? Upstream provides a gem what makes you think this is not a gem? The installation instructions even indicate the program and libraries can be installed by using 'gem install ferret'... You got me confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 17:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261759.m9QHxrsT031994@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 13:59:52 EDT --- Hello, Kevin: As the sponsor of Stefan would you re-review this package? IMO there are some issues left to fix on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:04:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261804.m9QI4TZP027719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 14:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Care to comment? Upstream provides a gem Then you must use the gem as the source > what makes you think this is not a > gem? Because _this package_ does not contain any gem. > The installation instructions even indicate the program and libraries can > be installed by using 'gem install ferret'... It is for people not using rpm system by installing this software by him/herself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:02:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465601] Review Request: libnxml - C library for parsing, writing and creating XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261802.m9QI2NdX032625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465601 Andreas Bierfert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:03:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261803.m9QI3RoP032726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:03:25 EDT --- Ok, I'll take this review 1. Please do not use 69bonvenocf-fonts as package name. Use bonvenocf-fonts or cf-bonveno-fonts (cf-bonveno-fonts is probably better as it will give you a Crude Factory prefix to use with other Crude Factory fonts) 2. Please use install -dm 755 instead of mkdir as suggested by the official spec template 3. You can remove the "for example" comment 4. 69 is a bit low as fontconfig prefix, 64 is probably sufficient for a latin font 5. Use 1.1 as version since upstream provides a nicely versionned archive 6. Since upstream provides sfd sources, please build the ttf from source using fontforge. You have an example of sfd building in bug #467507 for example 7. the font is GPLv2 + font exception (cf README) 8. Why do you want to disable hinting for this font? 9. Why do you want to prepend en to the font? 10. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases 12. Please fine a way to add Barry Schwartz' name in the summary (flattering font designers is good for our interactions with them) 14. Please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BonvenoCF_font to remove the font from the wishlist (change the Catzgorization). You should not need packaging powers to do that, just a FAS account All in all, that's not too bad an attempt for a first font package. Fix all this, and I'll sponsor you if that's still needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:10:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261810.m9QIAi5U029059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:10:43 EDT --- Well, you really need to sed the sfd files too so the font name (as displayed in applications is not Old Standard but Old Standard SFD (or something like this) Appart from that both yours and Ankur's submissions clearly need more baking. Please work together or separately so we have something solid to review (the run of reviews I did today should provide good guidance, just look at them in the fedora-fonts-bugs-list archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:19:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261819.m9QIJmim030011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-26 14:19:47 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-GeneR-2.11.1-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:20:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261820.m9QIK7kD030338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-26 14:20:06 EDT --- Thanks for the comments Mamoru! (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=321519) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321519) [details] > Comment for Patch2 Good catch. Will fix. > Some notes for 1.35.1-1: > > * License > - Well as far as I checked the whole code I only find codes > under > * license written in "COPYING" (Copyright only) > * LGPLv2+ (e.g. fitsfile.c) > So the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". > Also add some files to %doc which indicates LGPL license. Thanks, you seem to be right. Will be fixed in next revision. > * Source origin > - Would you write where you obtained %SOURCE3? I stole it :) Actually -- the logo is present in the source code (being the default picture to display). I grabbed this one from some random site and converted from gif, assuming it's no problem to use it given it's already included in the source code anyways. > * BuildRequires > - In your srpm "BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils" is missing > (while the spec file on the URL you posted here has it) I must have uploaded some older version by mistake. I will ensure it is present in next revision. > * %install script > - What is the line below for? > ------------------------------------------------------------- > install -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/dev Will remove it. It was used in on of earlier revisions, since the make install creates some links in /dev by default. > * XML file > - I guess this should be installed under %_datadir/mime/packages Right. Thanks for noticing that. > * Directory ownership issue > - The directory %_datadir/mime must not be owned by this > package. Why? It does not include shared-mime-info or any other package that would require it in its dependency chain. > By the way: > open error: No such file or directory > ERROR: unable to open /dev/imt1o > Error: No remote input possible. This is OK since we do not ship IRAF. > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. This does not happen in my el5. Could you please tell me which Fedora version do you use? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:19:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261819.m9QIJo38002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-26 14:19:50 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-GeneR-2.11.1-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:27:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261827.m9QIReLI003813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 14:27:39 EDT --- Some notes: - As ext/posh.c is under BSD, the license tag must be "MIT and BSD" (we have to actually check the licenses of all codes, not just license text) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:35:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261835.m9QIZH6g004917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #11 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 14:35:16 EDT --- OK, this is why the package ended up being what it is right now: Attempt #1: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904055 Attempt #2: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904077 Attempt #3: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904137 Attempt #4: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904313 Attempt #5 (current package, successful): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904318 The first 4 attempts use .gem and gem install from upstream's source code .tgz, but fail during build although running them through mock locally would succeed. Since I wasn't able to determine how to package the software 1) according to package guidelines, 2) with debuginfo, 3) without -devel ending up in the base package, 4) without /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot borking over binaries that matched the buildroot, I went with packaging it the way that I did (Attempt #5). (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Care to comment? Upstream provides a gem > Then you must use the gem as the source This one is new for me... can you elaborate on the fact that if it's a gem, you must use the upstream provided gem? I can't seem to find the guidelines saying that I should. Thanks in advance! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:42:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261842.m9QIgo3G001042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 14:42:49 EDT --- also please rename the package sil-gentium-basic-fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261843.m9QIhSAm006015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #12 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 14:43:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Some notes: > > - As ext/posh.c is under BSD, the license tag must be "MIT and BSD" (we > have to actually check the licenses of all codes, not just license > text) I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these changes when we're done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:45:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261845.m9QIjMkx006439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-26 14:45:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > By the way it may be good to check implicit function declaration > by adding -Werror-implicit-function-declaration: This sounds worthwhile. Due to the big amount of functions without prototypes (there's at least one in vast majority of files) this would require substantial effort. For now I included headers for functions covered by FORTIFY_SOURCE where they were missing and I'll add prototypes for the rest if this becomes mandatory part of packaging guidelines. (I encourage you to advocate for that) New package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/saoimage.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/saoimage-1.35.1-2.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 18:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261858.m9QIwAnx003116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 14:58:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for the comments Mamoru! > > * Source origin > > - Would you write where you obtained %SOURCE3? > > I stole it :) > Actually -- the logo is present in the source code (being the default picture > to display). I grabbed this one from some random site and converted from gif, > assuming it's no problem to use it given it's already included in the source > code anyways. Okay, I trust you then. > > * Directory ownership issue > > - The directory %_datadir/mime must not be owned by this > > package. > > Why? It does not include shared-mime-info or any other package that would > require it in its dependency chain. Actually currently only shared-mime-info package owns this directory on my system. The same discussion can also be applied to %_datadir/icons/hicolor. > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > This does not happen in my el5. Could you please tell me which Fedora version > do you use? Thanks! I use F-10 i386. segv still occurs with -2 srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261908.m9QJ8j3X009697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmahut at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmahut at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:33:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261933.m9QJXtQH013192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #14 from S.A. Hartsuiker 2008-10-26 15:33:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Some notes: > > - As ext/posh.c is under BSD, the license tag must be "MIT and BSD" (we > have to actually check the licenses of all codes, not just license > text) Hmm, I had thought that the MIT license, so I didn't differentiate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:33:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261933.m9QJXB0M013141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 15:33:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Attempt #5 (current package, successful): > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904318 I will look at this after I wake up again. > (In reply to comment #9) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > Care to comment? Upstream provides a gem > > Then you must use the gem as the source > This one is new for me... can you elaborate on the fact that if it's a gem, you > must use the upstream provided gem? I can't seem to find the guidelines saying > that I should. Please recheck this. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gems - The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version (In reply to comment #12) > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these > changes when we're done. Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261940.m9QJe96n014310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 15:40:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #11) > > Attempt #5 (current package, successful): > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904318 > I will look at this after I wake up again. Ah, this one is current srpm... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:52:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261952.m9QJqphZ011181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-26 15:52:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Just do: > > cd ~/.blender/scripts > > ln -s /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafrayinterface.so . > > ln -s /usr/share/blender/scripts/_yafqt.so . > > and it should work with the official Fedora version. OK, I see the issue, I will create a future version of blender, which should fix this issue. But in may be nice, if you may put the .so files into %{_libdir}/blender so we can create multilib aware packages without any trouble. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 19:57:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810261957.m9QJvEud011819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-26 15:57:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > - %{datadir}/blender/scripts is owned by the blender package. > > These scripts are just for the integration between blender and yafaray. Yes, thats is okay, but if you wrote %{datadir}/blender/scripts in the %files stanza, you calims ownership of this directory, which is not right. you should wrote something like %{datadir}/blender/scripts/* or anything else to put files into this directory without calming wonership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 20:42:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262042.m9QKgBYY023147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 16:42:10 EDT --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904080&name=build.log uses the tgz to build the gem and then install the gem, but has left-over .o files installed https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904141&name=build.log is the next attempt and cleans out those .o files, but the ext/ferret_ext.so.debug file makes the rpm build bork nonetheless. This is one of the main reasons why I couldn't find a way to use or build and then use the gem itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 20:49:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 16:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262049.m9QKnIvA019153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-26 16:49:17 EDT --- ON rawhide I have create a blender package - release 2.48a-2 - which create symlinks from %{_libdir}/blender/scripts to ~/.blender/.scripts for executables. This should avoids the steps descriped in comment #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 21:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262104.m9QL43WD021120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-26 17:04:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > * Directory ownership issue > > > - The directory %_datadir/mime must not be owned by this > > > package. > > > > Why? It does not include shared-mime-info or any other package that would > > require it in its dependency chain. > > Actually currently only shared-mime-info package owns this directory > on my system. The same discussion can also be applied to > %_datadir/icons/hicolor. I quite don't understand if you still insist on not owning the package. In case yes, I don't see what would we gain here, except for having a slight possibility of the package leaving a stale unowned directory. > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > > This does not happen in my el5. Could you please tell me which Fedora version > > do you use? Thanks! > > I use F-10 i386. segv still occurs with -2 srpm. Thanks. I reproduced it in a mock chroot and think I have fixed it in new package: SPEC: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/saoimage.spec SRPM: http://netbsd.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/saoimage-1.35.1-3.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 21:18:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262118.m9QLI3LC027845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #17 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 17:18:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these > > changes when we're done. > Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file. The Bison exception is a "may remove (at your option)" which I'm not sure makes sense; how should I note this in the RPM License tag if it should be included in the RPM License tag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 21:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262157.m9QLvTBq028383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #21 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-26 17:57:27 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 21:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262159.m9QLxGRF000519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 22:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262202.m9QM2tFU029173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 Marek Mahut changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Marek Mahut 2008-10-26 18:02:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xvarstar Short Description: an astronomical program used for searching GCVS Owners: mmahut Branches: F-9, EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 22:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226663] Merge Review: ypbind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262207.m9QM7OA3002039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226663 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-26 18:07:21 EDT --- Thanks for working on this. I checked out the current devel branch; it builds fine; rpmlint says: ypbind.src: W: strange-permission ypbind.init 0755 I don't understand why rpmlint is complaining here. This seems fine to me. ypbind.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.20.4-9 ['3:1.20.4-9.fc10', '3:1.20.4-9'] Again, this seems quite OK. I'm guessing that it is complaining about not seeing the epoch in the changelog version, but don't think we generally add it there. So all of that looks bogus. I assume that the OTHER_YPBIND_OPTS thing is something to be set in /etc/sysconfig/network instead of being edited into the initscript. The changes to the package look good; packaging-wise I have no complaints. It's a bit odd seeing %{PACKAGE_VERSION} in the spec instead of %{version}; I've never seen it before but it seems to work well enough. Any idea why autoreconf is run? There's been a bunch of discussion about whether this should ever be run in a package, and while I don't fully understand that discussion, I do think it would be good to ensure that the autoreconf call is really needed and to add comments to the spec as appropriate. I note that rpmdiff shows only timestamp differences between a build that calls autoreconf and one that doesn't. As for the initscript patch in comment #7, it seems correct on its face but it's a bit tough to read with only a non-context diff and I'm not really an expert with the whole LSB init comment block thing anyway. Unfortunately I no longer have any vestige of my NIS infrastructure around so I can't test this at all. So really the only open issue I see is the autoreconf thing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 22:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262240.m9QMe9jD006786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 --- Comment #14 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-26 18:40:08 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 23:00:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262300.m9QN0Ae9004783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #18 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-26 19:00:09 EDT --- I changed the license to LGPLv2+ and I am using %{_datadir}/blender/scripts/* for the blender-yafaray package. It is not clear for me if we should keep _yafrayinterface.so and _yafqt.so in blender's scripts directory or in %{_libdir}/blender, as Jochen suggested. Either way is fine for me. Anyway, I can not go any further from here, because I am still being sponsored. Someone has to take over and try to build the package in koji. The links (spec and srpm) were updated, and ATrpms is up again. Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/yafaray.spec http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0-5.fc8.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 23:14:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262314.m9QNEqi2006594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |461849 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 23:14:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262314.m9QNErMf006626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 23:13:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] New: Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Summary: Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.1.20081026svn.fc9.src.rpm URL: http://libgarmin.sourceforge.net/ Description: Libgarmin is an in C written library for Garmin image format maps. The library can be used to parse Garmin image files. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=904966 [rpm at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i libgarmin* 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [rpm at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgarmin* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Oct 26 23:18:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810262318.m9QNIRGw007259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-26 19:18:26 EDT --- Review request for libgarmin: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:02:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270002.m9R020X3012959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-26 20:01:58 EDT --- BTW if you need to see an example of programmaticaly changing a font name at build time, just check how DejaVu does it for DejaVu LGC in its build scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:02:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468579] Review Request: PyQuante - Python Quantum Chemistry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270002.m9R02Ltk013000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468579 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-26 20:02:21 EDT --- Only some quick comment about the rpmlint output and your spec file... Spec file: Detail about packaging python stuff: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Name: PyQuante - The name of your package should be lower case https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity BuildRequires - 'BuildRequires: python' is missing % files - Please follow the guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture %changelog - E mail address is missing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs rpmlint output: (In reply to comment #0) > PyQuante.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/Minimizers.py 0644 You can add something like 'find *.py -type f | xargs chmod a+x' to fix this. > PyQuante.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/PyQuante/pressure.py If you have to remove DOS line endings in this file 'sed -i 's/\r$//' file.py' > PyQuante.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD > PyQuante-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Modified BSD For a valid license for Fedora, please take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:08:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270008.m9R08lgv013891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |basket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] New: Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Summary: Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput-0.6.1-1.0.fc9.src.rpm Description: wput is a command-line ftp-client that looks like wget but instead of downloading, uploads files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:07:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270007.m9R07Tk9018269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |wput -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:08:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270008.m9R082Db018315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:08:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270008.m9R08YKR018392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |rear -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:08:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270008.m9R08eZs018419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Alias| |verilator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 00:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270058.m9R0wCNm020405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #21 from Ken Sedgwick 2008-10-26 20:58:10 EDT --- The following are not packaged: ---------------------------------------------------------------- * ASNMP/asnmp/address.cpp MIT * TAO/CIAO/tools/IDL3_to_IDL2/be_extern.h LICENSE-A * TAO/TAO_IDL/contrib/mcpp/directive.cpp MIT * contrib/minizip/zip.h zlib * contrib/utility/Example/ExH/BadCast/bad_cast.cpp zlib The following are packaged: ---------------------------------------------------------------- * TAO/TAO_IDL/be_include/be_extern.h (LICENSE-A) > Included in the debuginfo package. > > Code which includes this is packaged in tao-devel. * TAO/TAO_IDL/driver/drv_args.cpp (LICENSE-A) > Linked into tao_idl. * TAO/TAO_IDL/fe/y.tab.h GPLv2+ (Bison output) > Linked into libTAO_IDL_FE.so. > > Code which includes this is packaged in tao-devel. > > But this is Bison output and contains the following: > > /* As a special exception, when this file is copied by Bison into a > Bison output file, you may use that output file without restriction. > This special exception was added by the Free Software Foundation > in version 1.24 of Bison. */ * TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/AV/RTCP.cpp BSD with advertising > Ships in tao package in libTAO_AV.so * ace/Svc_Conf_y.cpp GPLv2+ (Bison output) > Ships in ace package in libACE.so > > Contains the following: > > /* As a special exception, you may create a larger work that contains > part or all of the Bison parser skeleton and distribute that work > under terms of your choice, so long as that work isn't itself a > parser generator using the skeleton or a modified version thereof > as a parser skeleton. Alternatively, if you modify or redistribute > the parser skeleton itself, you may (at your option) remove this > special exception, which will cause the skeleton and the resulting > Bison output files to be licensed under the GNU General Public > License without this special exception. * apps/gperf/src/Gen_Perf.h GPLv2+ > Ships in ace-devel. > > Linked into /usr/bin/ace_gperf. I'm a little unclear on the next steps, please advise. Ken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 01:59:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 21:59:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-GlobalDestruction OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction.spec Description: Perl's global destruction is a little tricky to deal with WRT finalizers because its not ordered and objects can sometimes disappear. Writing defensive destructors is hard and annoying, and usually if global destruction is happenning you only need the destructors that free up non process local resources to actually execute. For these constructors you can avoid the mess by simply bailing out if global destruction is in effect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 02:00:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270200.m9R20WWD001639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-26 22:00:32 EDT --- This package is a new requirement of Class::MOP. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=905263 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 02:17:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270217.m9R2H2do032242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius 2008-10-26 22:17:01 EDT --- Just a couple of remarks: (In reply to comment #0) > [rpm at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint libgarmin* > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Interesting, rpmlint is worse than I had thought:) MUSTFIX - libgarmin.a is missing from *-devel Without, this *-devel rpm is widely useless. - package doesn't support shared libraries => Must add *-static magic to *-devel - Wrong License: Your spec says: License: GPLv2+ Several files (e.g. libgarmin.h and COPYING) inside of the sources say: GPLv2 *only*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 02:37:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270237.m9R2bKkM006947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-26 22:37:19 EDT --- OK, the tarball matches what I get from the upstream web site now. rpmlint has grown a new complaint: mmdb.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmmdb.so.0.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 I didn't see this last time, which implies that either you had fixed the two places where exit() is called in the your modified tarball or that rpmlint has grown this complaint recently. There was an rpmlint update three days ago so that might be it. In any case, this is a rather odd thing for a shared library to do; I'd expect abnormal exits to call abort() instead, assuming they actually need to stop program execution. Obviously you wouldn't expect any normal exits from library code, but upstream software authors often do rather dumb things. I don't really see this as a blocker, however; it's more something that should be reported as a bug upstream. In any case, the issues I raised earlier are fixed, and the above isn't a blocker, I'd say we're done. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:15:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270315.m9R3F2KD008351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 23:15:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Example B (spec file by sseago) > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-mongrel/devel/rubygem-mongrel.spec?view=co(In > reply to comment #17) Correct URL: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-mongrel/devel/rubygem-mongrel.spec?view=co -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:14:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270314.m9R3E9WG008147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-26 23:14:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904080&name=build.log uses > the tgz to build the gem and then install the gem, but has left-over .o files > installed > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904141&name=build.log is the > next attempt and cleans out those .o files, but the ext/ferret_ext.so.debug > file makes the rpm build bork nonetheless. This is one of the main reasons why > I couldn't find a way to use or build and then use the gem itself. Sorry, however other maintainer handles this. Please fix this. Example A (my case) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-zoom/devel/rubygem-zoom.spec?view=co Example B (spec file by sseago) http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-mongrel/devel/rubygem-mongrel.spec?view=co(In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #13) > > (In reply to comment #12) > > > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push these > > > changes when we're done. > > Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file. > > The Bison exception is a "may remove (at your option)" which I'm not sure makes > sense; how should I note this in the RPM License tag if it should be included > in the RPM License tag? Simply use "License: MIT and BSD". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:18:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270318.m9R3IjHr013320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-26 23:18:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > The following are not packaged: > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > * ASNMP/asnmp/address.cpp MIT > * TAO/CIAO/tools/IDL3_to_IDL2/be_extern.h LICENSE-A > * TAO/TAO_IDL/contrib/mcpp/directive.cpp MIT > * contrib/minizip/zip.h zlib > * contrib/utility/Example/ExH/BadCast/bad_cast.cpp zlib They may not be packaged, but they are used. I'm not at all concerned about the MIT or zlib items (or the Bison output files), those licenses are pretty much universally compatible. Its the LICENSE-A items that need to be removed or replaced upstream, because that license is non-free, and almost certainly incompatible with the DOC license. * TAO/orbsvcs/orbsvcs/AV/RTCP.cpp BSD with advertising This one might be a problem if it linked into GPL items, but I don't think it is an issue here (although apps/gperf/src/Gen_Perf.h being GPLv2+ might complicate things). I would try to get the copyright holder to simply drop the advertising clause on that code. The next steps will be to address the issue with upstream, all of the code under LICENSE-A (aka Sun Interface Definition Language CFE License) needs to either be removed or replaced in the source tree (whether or not it ends up in a package is immaterial). 99% Free code + 1% Non-Free code = 100% Non-Free binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:29:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454687] Review Request: perl-Mail-ClamAV - Perl extension for the clamav virus scanner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270329.m9R3T2uL014689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454687 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |456144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 03:45:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270345.m9R3jPRf017383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-26 23:45:24 EDT --- Well, that took longer than I intended. Here are my comments: It takes about 30 minutes to check out the git tree. Is there any way to check out a subtree? The checkout instructions are slightly wrong; you need to cd into the "spacewalk" directory as well, and the instructions generate an srpm, not a tgz. We need instructions for generating the tgz. A "git archive" instruction would probably work. Honestly this would all be much simpler if someone just made a tarball and stuck it on an appropriate web site. I confirmed my comments above; "make srpm" will indeed make an srpm of whatever version of perl-Satcon happens to be in git head. The packager is supposed to bug the upstream developers if there's no copy of the license text included in the package. In this case, you're the upstream so I'll just ask you to please consider including the text of the license you use in your tarball. Really my only concern is the issue of duplicating the source tarball * source files match upstream (compared manually from git checkout). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Satcon) perl-Satcon = 1.7-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Temp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(RPM::Specfile) perl(Satcon) perl(bytes) perl(lib) perl(strict) * %check is present and the minimal test suite passes. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468299] Review Request: jabberpy - Python xmlstream and jabber IM protocol libs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270405.m9R45vpD020291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468299 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:05:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:12:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467365] Review Request: reinteract - interactive Python shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270412.m9R4Ca6w021358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467365 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:12:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:15:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270415.m9R4FQZh021940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:15:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:16:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270416.m9R4GUJ0022170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:16:28 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:13:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468414] Review Request: hamcrest - Hamcrest matcher object framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270413.m9R4DqTL021502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468414 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:13:51 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:19:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270419.m9R4Jv6T022601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:19:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:17:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270417.m9R4HZQ0022429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:17:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:24:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270424.m9R4Ovl2018495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:24:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:21:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270421.m9R4LLwQ018271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:21:20 EDT --- CVS done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:22:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270422.m9R4MQbQ023252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:22:25 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:27:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225887] Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270427.m9R4RfY2019139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-27 00:27:40 EDT --- This package has been around forever. But let's make it match the guidelines. Here are my notes: * The URL in the SPEC file needs fixed. The new URL is http://icon-theme.freedesktop.org/wiki/HicolorTheme * It would be better if the file Changelog is included in the RPM. * Disttag is missing. Is there a particular reason? * The two exit 0 lines seem unnecessary. Well, that's pretty much it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:27:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270427.m9R4REEj019104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:27:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:29:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270429.m9R4TKmn024048@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:29:19 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:30:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270430.m9R4URd3024430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:30:26 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:35:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270435.m9R4Z4eF020338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:35:03 EDT --- unsetting cvs request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270431.m9R4Vi2s019814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:31:43 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:34:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270434.m9R4Y0FD024825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:33:59 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:36:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270436.m9R4aBNu025436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:36:10 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:39:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448717] Review Request: gnome-rdp - rdesktop front end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270439.m9R4dT7X025720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448717 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:39:27 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:41:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270441.m9R4fagq026321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis at ausil.us Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #38 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:41:35 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:44:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270444.m9R4iPuG021539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:44:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:46:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458746] Review Request: python-netaddr - Network address manipulation, done Pythonically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270446.m9R4kTwI027191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458746 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:46:28 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:43:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270443.m9R4hLHY026522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:43:19 EDT --- CVS Done, no need to put yourself on the initialCC list. you will get cc'd as the owner -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 04:50:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270450.m9R4o1CR027456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Dennis Gilmore 2008-10-27 00:50:00 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 06:55:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270655.m9R6tCZw007334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 02:55:11 EDT --- cryptopp-5.5.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cryptopp-5.5.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 06:53:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462104] Review Request: cryptopp - Public domain C++ class library of cryptographic schemes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270653.m9R6rAD7011846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462104 Aurelien Bompard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Aurelien Bompard 2008-10-27 02:53:09 EDT --- Built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 07:33:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461429] Review Request: zsync - Incremental file-transfer program without special server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270733.m9R7XJ3f012354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461429 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |debarshi.ray at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-27 03:33:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > @ Debarshi: > Sorry for "stealing" your review, but I promised to finish John's pre-review > for educational purposes before I sponsor him. I hope you don't mind. No problem. I got a bit busy with fixing some of my packages before the freeze deadline, so it is good that you took it. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 07:45:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270745.m9R7jQDl019524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 07:44:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270744.m9R7iD5l019079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |alexl at users.sourceforge.net Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #17 from Alex Lancaster 2008-10-27 03:44:11 EDT --- This package has never been built successfully on rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6917 and should not have passed review or been closed. This is currently causing broken deps in rawhide, because it is inheriting from the F-9 build which is built against an oder version of libgnome: Broken deps for i386 ---------------------------------------------------------- ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.i386 requires libgnome-desktop-2.so.2 ume-launcher-0.6.3-1.fc9.i386 requires libclutter-glx-0.6.so.0 Please fix ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 07:46:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270746.m9R7kmZp019813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?(jonathan.roberts. | |uk at googlemail.com) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 08:12:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:12:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270812.m9R8CSWo018982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |jamatos at fc.up.pt Blocks|177841 | Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Jos? Matos 2008-10-27 04:12:26 EDT --- Basket is already in Fedora: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/basket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 08:19:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270819.m9R8JNbm020187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Roberts 2008-10-27 04:19:22 EDT --- It fails to build on rawhide because of an error with the way it looks for intltool... upstream have renamed the package and have a newer version under the new name that does build. A renamed package involves a new review, though? Is it best to kill this package and get the new one in? I have to run, will try and fix again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 08:33:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270833.m9R8XxZk028067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-27 04:33:56 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libical New Branches: EL-5 New branch Owners: lkundrak Rishi, the Fedora maintainer of the package: "Right now I don't want to dive into EPEL because I have my hands full with Fedora. So it would be nice if you could maintain the EL branch." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 08:40:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270840.m9R8eYYG029654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-27 04:40:33 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:00:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270900.m9R90UDH028263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 --- Comment #23 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-27 05:00:29 EDT --- cvs done. You need to go to pkgdb to ask for the commit access though -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:01:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426698] Review Request: libical - Reference implementation of the iCalendar data type and serialization format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270901.m9R912DT028392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426698 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:09:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270909.m9R99uFf002702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 05:09:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 1. Why don't you have just one patch for the fortran-related stuff? Remove > commented sed line. The first is the patch sent upstream. The second is the patch against configure which ends to be specific with the sources version used. > 2. To my understanding you don't need the zlib patch, since you require zlib >= > 1.2.3 (the bug is only present in zlib 1.2.2). Remove patch0. wrong, there is nothing common with the zlib 1.2.2 bug and the undefined-non-weak-symbol related to a missing -lz at link time. > 3. Remove all rpath related stuff, matio builds fine without them. wrong, not in x86_64 at least. The cause is the autotools version used to generate the source archive. > 4-5-6. man doxygen and pdf is the same content. Thus to provide the 3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:14:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270914.m9R9E34q030622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-27 05:14:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > i spoke with upstream > > teeworlds 0.5 will be released in a few weeks > > bam is up to now unversioned. with teeworlds 0.5 bam will be versioned. > > perhaps we should really start with 0.5? > > what do you mean? We have communicated this via IRC with result "Package anything that works" :) Any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270919.m9R9JEmw004679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-27 05:19:13 EDT --- s/it/is/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270918.m9R9Ixe2004633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-27 05:18:58 EDT --- Do you have a spec file for boost, re comment 7? I have a pretty rubbish one: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel?cmd=manifest;manifest=c1faf15c38245919737c88541c025a9e9dc1bea0;path=/boost/ It builds just enough to work with Inkscape, but it extremely hacky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:34:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270934.m9R9YGSH001963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-27 05:34:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > 3. Remove all rpath related stuff, matio builds fine without them. > wrong, not in x86_64 at least. The cause is the autotools version used to > generate the source archive. Actually, I built matio-1.3.3 in x86_64 with and had no trouble with rpaths. Didn't patch anything, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:34:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451772] Review Request: ume-launcher - a full screen application launcher for gnome In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270934.m9R9Y3E8007305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451772 --- Comment #19 from Alex Lancaster 2008-10-27 05:34:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > It fails to build on rawhide because of an error with the way it looks for > intltool... upstream have renamed the package and have a newer version under > the new name that does build. Yes, I thought it was something like that. > A renamed package involves a new review, though? Is it best to kill this > package and get the new one in? Yes, I think so. Meanwhile, can you file a bug with rel-eng: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng requesting blocking ume-launcher from rawhide, and then delete your pending build via bodhi for F-9? > I have to run, will try and fix again later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:45:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270945.m9R9jD1b009633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Andreas Thienemann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Andreas Thienemann 2008-10-27 05:45:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ladvd Owners: ixs New Branches: EL-5 EL-4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:50:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270950.m9R9oiad005282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 Pavel Lis? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pavel.lisy at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #15 from Pavel Lis? 2008-10-27 05:50:43 EDT --- I wrote directly to your email. Did you receive it? Now I am little bit further. I have made first CVS commits to every branches but I am now sure what to do next. Do I have to add package to Bodhi or this is only for updates? How can I add package to "comps" files? Is it relevant yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 09:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 05:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448435] Review Request: PythonCard - PythonCard GUI construction toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810270951.m9R9psdA005468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448435 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-27 05:51:53 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 10:39:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:39:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271039.m9RAd9kO013424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-27 06:39:08 EDT --- Imported and built. Thanks for the package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 10:45:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447456] Review Request: gupnp-tools: a collection of dev tools utilising GUPnP and GTK+ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271045.m9RAjHwx020053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447456 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2008-10-27 06:45:16 EDT --- Built and in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 10:51:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 06:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271051.m9RApKik015790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #5 from David Carter 2008-10-27 06:51:19 EDT --- I'm encountering many small selinux issues that keep holding me up. I'm going to prepare a non-selinux release until these are fixed. I should have this ready within a day or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 11:01:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461794] Review Request:0xFFFF - The Open Free Fiasco Firmware Flasher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271101.m9RB1IoJ017710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461794 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 07:01:16 EDT --- David, Manuel approved your package. Now you can go on with the CVS procedure. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 11:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271137.m9RBbTS5028762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #9 from Gratien D'haese 2008-10-27 07:37:27 EDT --- Hi all, Busy with correcting the rear.spec and some other comments you mentioned above. I've seeing now: [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.src.rpm rear.src: W: strange-permission rear.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/contrib ./usr/share/rear/contrib The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh bash The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/README ./usr/share/rear/README The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/CHANGES ./usr/share/rear/CHANGES The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/init bin/init The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/log/lastlog rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/lib/nfs/state rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/etc/mtab 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. [makerpm at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7. Error: no installed packages by name /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rear-1.7. 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ==> Rear makes usage of relative symbolic links. Is there a way to suppress these warning? Or is it safe to ignore? ==> the zero-length file are necessary when we build a boot image. We can safely ignore these errors. Is there a way to tell in rear.spec file to say we can ignore "zero length" files? Would like to avoid submitting a new version which still produces errors during a rpmlint investigation. thanks, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 11:44:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271144.m9RBiNlw024751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 07:44:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Implemented all suggestions with the exception of changing %Source0 to be a URL > to the fedorahosted wiki. I'm not sure I understand this. If I make this > change, rpmbuild fails. Also, I looked at (2) other fedora hosted projects > that I'm pretty sure are fedora packages and their %Source0 looked like mine. > Can you help me understand this better? The problem seems to be the path (...?format=raw, rpmbuild can't handle GET in an URL). I'm sorry that I guided you in the wrong direction about this. The guys from 'Fedora Python Modules' [1] use in their spec file [2] the following entry: Source0: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/p/y/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz But the directory of suds is empty ( https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/suds/ ) . The Fedora Hosted FAQ tells you how you can publish a tarball. from https://fedorahosted.org/web/en/faq "How can I publish archive releases (tgz, zip, etc) for my project? Create the archive on your workstation and run scp myProject-0.1.tar.gz fedorahosted.org:. The archive will be located under https://fedorahosted.org/releases/" > Also, seems like the spec should be named suds.spec. Can I change this? >From my point of view the name is ok. [3] [1] https://fedorahosted.org/python-fedora/ [2] https://fedorahosted.org/python-fedora/browser/python-fedora-stable/python-fedora.spec [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 11:58:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 07:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271158.m9RBw8Bl027534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 07:58:07 EDT --- Appendices: I can't sponsor you, but I can help you with my limited packaging skills. If you are still seeking a sponsor, get in touch with Tom "spot" Callaway about your spnsorship because I don't know the right way for RH employees or if it's different from the standard way of sponsorship. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored After you made changes to your spec file, please bump the release. This ways it's easier to rack the changes for everybody. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:34:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:34:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271234.m9RCYbYj007304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-27 08:34:36 EDT --- Excellent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:36:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271236.m9RCabOI003155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-27 08:36:36 EDT --- Sven, FYI, it's best to not let updates to reviews sit more than two weeks. If for some reason you're unable to complete the review, it's best to unassign it from your self so it's clear what's going on and another reviewer can be sought. Lubomir, if need be, I can finish this. -J -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:45:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:45:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454412] Review Request: mingw32-runtime - MinGW Windows cross-compiler runtime and root filesystem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271245.m9RCj7bf004854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454412 --- Comment #10 from Harry Waye 2008-10-27 08:45:06 EDT --- I don't have time to look at it at the moment. The person I spoke to in #boost was volodya. It was also very hacky. There were some tickets made for it on https://zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su:7813/boost.build/ but I don't remember which ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:43:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462163] Review Request: checkdns - A Domain Name Server analysis and reporting tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271243.m9RCh6Eu009043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462163 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-27 08:43:05 EDT --- John, do you want to submit a new version or should I review the existing one (which we already know that has at least two blockers) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:47:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271247.m9RClXpj009889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 --- Comment #6 from Sven Lankes 2008-10-27 08:47:32 EDT --- Sorry. In my head this review had the status 'waiting for packager' when in reality it really is 'packager waiting for reviewer'. I'll work on this tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271252.m9RCqajU010821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 08:52:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, I'll take this review > > 1. Please do not use 69bonvenocf-fonts as package name. Use bonvenocf-fonts or > cf-bonveno-fonts (cf-bonveno-fonts is probably better as it will give you a > Crude Factory prefix to use with other Crude Factory fonts) > > 2. Please use install -dm 755 instead of mkdir as suggested by the official > spec template > > 3. You can remove the "for example" comment > > 4. 69 is a bit low as fontconfig prefix, 64 is probably sufficient for a latin > font > > 5. Use 1.1 as version since upstream provides a nicely versionned archive > > 6. Since upstream provides sfd sources, please build the ttf from source using > fontforge. You have an example of sfd building in bug #467507 for example > > 7. the font is GPLv2 + font exception (cf README) > > 8. Why do you want to disable hinting for this font? > > 9. Why do you want to prepend en to the font? > > 10. Please reformat your xml files with xmllint --format before submission so > they are nicely indented with the same rules as other font packages > > 11. When you've written fontconfig rules you're happy with it's always a good > idea to send them upstream to be included in the font next releases > > 12. Please fine a way to add Barry Schwartz' name in the summary (flattering > font designers is good for our interactions with them) > > 14. Please update http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BonvenoCF_font to remove the > font from the wishlist (change the Catzgorization). You should not need > packaging powers to do that, just a FAS account > > All in all, that's not too bad an attempt for a first font package. Fix all > this, and I'll sponsor you if that's still needed hi, rebuilt the package with your guidelines, as much as i could understand: SPEC: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm I dint know how to tackle point 8 9 10 I dont think i know enough for sposnorship yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:57:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271257.m9RCvY97007184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-27 08:57:33 EDT --- If I had a nickel for every time I'd done that. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:58:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271258.m9RCwjpr007302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 08:58:44 EDT --- cfdg-2.1-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cfdg-2.1-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 12:59:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 08:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271259.m9RCxrAa007502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 08:59:51 EDT --- tackled point 8 and 9.. SPEC: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 13:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271316.m9RDGOfb011726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) | --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2008-10-27 09:16:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > BTW if you need to see an example of programmaticaly changing a font name at > build time, just check how DejaVu does it for DejaVu LGC in its build scripts hi, rebuilt: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:07:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271407.m9RE7Xkn022132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 10:07:32 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file - Release: 1.0%{?dist} - Just '1' is enough. Next release will be '2' - You can use the macro %{name} everywhere where you used 'wput' - %files section - '%defattr(-,root,root)', the usual one is '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25files_section - Is it not enough just to use '%{_bindir}/%{name}' insteed of '%attr(0755, root, root) %{_bindir}/wput' ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271409.m9RE9qn5026368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #23 from R P Herrold 2008-10-27 10:09:50 EDT --- looks great -- thank you -- It certainly meets my approval -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:08:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271408.m9RE8niS026212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #22 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-27 10:08:46 EDT --- SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.87/homestead.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.87/homestead-0.87-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:11:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271411.m9REBR6m027074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-27 10:11:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: homestead Short Description: 3D real-time network visualiser Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:21:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271421.m9REL9Ib025304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Ortel 2008-10-27 10:21:08 EDT --- Again, thanks for the help. I updated the makefile to publish (scp) the tar.gz files to fedorahosted as suggested and bumped to release (2). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:26:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271426.m9REQjKG030630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #8 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 10:26:45 EDT --- You need to add %__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot in ~/.rpmmacros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271433.m9REXOge031708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-27 10:33:23 EDT --- No, rpmbuild does it automatically. At least in F9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:37:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271437.m9REbsUS028555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #25 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-27 10:37:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: homestead Short Description: 3D real-time network visualiser Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:42:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271442.m9REg6RI029477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #9 from Sergio Pascual 2008-10-27 10:42:05 EDT --- There is a package called game-menus, that create submenus based in subcategories. The puzzles go into 'Logic & Puzzles' By the way, the name of the puzzles should start with a capital letter, following the convention of the rest of the menu entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:45:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271445.m9REj4C4001980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 --- Comment #6 from ZC Miao 2008-10-27 10:45:02 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg.spec SRPM: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg-0.9.6-1.src.rpm Archive has been released: http://www.ipmsg.org/index.html.en http://www.ipmsg.org/archive/g2ipmsg-0.9.6.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:50:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467718] Review Request: rubygem-gruff - Beautiful graphs for one or multiple datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271450.m9REonni003006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467718 --- Comment #1 from Darryl L. Pierce 2008-10-27 10:50:49 EDT --- Can I get someone to review this package for me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 14:47:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271447.m9REl9St002409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #6 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-27 10:47:08 EDT --- I exchanged emails with Sun's Open Source Community Manager and Sun's Open Source Chief Officer (Simon Phipps). The message I got from them is very clear: - Sun would love to see fuse-zfs being added to the Fedora distribution - There should be *no* legal issues, neither license nor patents related, that should block the review and acceptance of this package in Fedora. To be more precise: 1) There are no license issues between Fuse-ZFS and ZFS itself. http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FAQ#Under_what_conditions_may_I_distribute_a_filesystem_which_uses_libfusex3f 2) Fuse-ZFS has no patent issues in regards to ZFS. Fuse-ZFS is CDDL, and as such receives all the patent protection that CDDL grants. This is explicit in the CDDL license, 2.1.b and 2.2.b (http://www.sun.com/cddl/cddl.html). The patent protection applies to ZFS modifications and derivative works as well. This means that Fuse-ZFS can be modified, can be redistributed, or even forked for that matter. As long as the modifications are made public, just as with the GPL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271501.m9RF13hu005112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 Ray Strode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:01:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468701] New: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468701 Summary: Merge Review: desktop-file-utils Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: redhat-rpm-config AssignedTo: jonathan at jonmasters.org ReportedBy: rstrode at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, pmatilai at redhat.com, rstrode at redhat.com, pertusus at free.fr, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, jonathan at jonmasters.org Blocks: 225681 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #225681 +++ --- Additional comment from pertusus at free.fr on 2008-10-17 18:21:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=320728) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320728) file spec patch to implement request of the review Please review and tell me if you want the whole patch to be applied. If yes I'll apply and rebuild, if no, please apply what you want. --- Additional comment from rstrode at redhat.com on 2008-10-18 00:43:24 EDT --- Everything looks good but removing the .prov file. If you think it should go in redhat-rpm-config or whatever, we should get it there first before taking it out here. --- Additional comment from pertusus at free.fr on 2008-10-25 09:28:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Everything looks good but removing the .prov file. If you think it should go > in redhat-rpm-config or whatever, we should get it there first before taking it > out here. Please submit it to redhat-rpm-config then, I'd prefer if you do it, since redhat-rpm-config are not very responsive to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:01:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225681] Merge Review: desktop-file-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271501.m9RF1a6B000891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225681 --- Comment #15 from Ray Strode 2008-10-27 11:01:34 EDT --- filed Bug 468701 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:07:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:07:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271507.m9RF7nOA001964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 11:07:45 EDT --- Honestly as an FPC member I'm quite interested in actually seeing how the guidelines work for someone who is not familiar with Haskell. Besides, at this point it seems as if you are submitting the package, which would mean that it is quite inappropriate for you to be reviewing it as well. Before progressing, though, the remaining questions in comment #20 need answers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271529.m9RFTa2p006043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #17 from Nathaniel McCallum 2008-10-27 11:29:35 EDT --- Please ignore my packaging nitpicks. Its far more important (to me) that it is packaged than *how* it is packaged. Sorry for slowing up the process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:27:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:27:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271527.m9RFRNUd005895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |quantumburnz at hotmail.com Blocks| |177841 Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-27 11:27:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Basket is already in Fedora: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/basket Sorry, I should have been more clear. I submitted this review in response to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452994. The current package maintainer didn't have time to update to the new release and told me I could do it if I wanted. I'm also seeking sponsorship so I figured it would be good submit another package in additional to my original. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271541.m9RFfGPl013069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-27 11:41:15 EDT --- One more note for Christopher, I'm currently rather busy with things to fix before the final F-10 freeze (which is tonight) after that I'll make some time and review both this one and barry, of both reviews go ok (which I assume they will) I'll sponsor you once both packages are in a state where I'm happy to approve them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:39:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271539.m9RFdH0o012441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gauret at free.fr Component|Package Review |basket Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-27 11:39:16 EDT --- Note to others I'm in the process of sponsoring Christopher, also see review bug 467958. Christopher, Ah, ok so this is a Re-Review, in the light of sponsoring you and in the light of the issues you've mentioned I think that is a good idea. It would have been good to mention that with the initial review submission though. So I'll assign this one to me (as your potential sponsor) and change the component to the existing basket as to not confuse all the automated review scripts and searches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:46:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271546.m9RFkdO2009421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-27 11:46:38 EDT --- upstream input, constructive criticism, etc... is always very welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:49:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271549.m9RFnXUd009764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 15:49:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271549.m9RFn4Tg009687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |brickshooter - A small |kcirbshooter - A small |puzzle game |puzzle game Flag| |needinfo?(cheekyboinc at fores | |ightlinux.org) --- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen 2008-10-27 11:49:02 EDT --- All this on top of my first review in comment #1. Bad: ==== - MUSTFIX: Re-add information about the copyright terms and holder to the source file (luckily there's only one ;-), i.e. I found the following in the original source file and leaving it out may technically be a GPL violation: ... License: GPLv2 paxed at alt.org 20080502 ... Possibly just leave the existing top level comment and add yours(*) before that to be on the safe side. (*) e.g. "kcirbshooter is a fork of the game found at http://... which was done to avoid confusion with the original Brickshooter(tm) game" -- Spot, what do you think? - MUSTFIX: Don't distribute the compiled executable in the source tarball, it might use the pre-built binary otherwise. - MUSTFIX: Use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot consistently, not both. - MUSTFIX: Use RPM optimization flags. I'll attach a patch which lets you set them this way: make OPTFLAGS="%optflags" ${?_smp_mflags}" - MUSTFIX: correct grammar of description: """ Kcirbshooter is a small puzzle game for linux, where you have to clear the central area from differently colored bricks. Three or more adjacent bricks of the same color will vanish. You can shoot bricks into the playing field from the fringes. """ Good: ===== - No potential for confusion with original Brickshooter game. - Owns all directories it creates or depends on packages that contain them. - Includes license as documentation - Builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 16:05:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271605.m9RG5GKO017778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #6 from Jos? Matos 2008-10-27 12:05:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Note to others I'm in the process of sponsoring Christopher, also see review > bug 467958. > > Christopher, > > Ah, ok so this is a Re-Review, in the light of sponsoring you and in the light > of the issues you've mentioned I think that is a good idea. It would have been > good to mention that with the initial review submission though. Yes. :-) I would not have closed it if I knew the reasons for the re-review. A small note at begin it is enough. > So I'll assign this one to me (as your potential sponsor) and change the > component to the existing basket as to not confuse all the automated review > scripts and searches. Now, if I may add a note about the description: I don't like the second sentence in description: "Organizing your notes has never been so easy." I think it adds nothing useful to the description, even if I use just basket to take notes on computer. I understand that the description comes mostly from the package documentation and webpage but as packager we should strive to make the description mostly objective. This is not a blocker (if it were I would have to review all my packages descriptions before ;-) ) but it is something for you to consider (a nitpick). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 16:49:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271649.m9RGnSrd026215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 12:49:25 EDT --- Any updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 16:51:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 287191] Review Request: mod_auth_cas - Apache authentication for the CAS Single Sign-On service In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271651.m9RGpfbF026781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287191 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 12:51:39 EDT --- Well, it's been another week with no response. I guess I'll close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 16:53:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428435] Review Request: shezhu - Shezhu Resource Sharing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271653.m9RGrBfw021203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428435 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841 |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 12:53:10 EDT --- And its been another week; I guess I'll close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 16:52:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427706] Review Request: python-urwid - console user interface for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271652.m9RGqMqo026975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427706 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 12:52:19 EDT --- Any response to the above commentary? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:40:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271740.m9RHe9Dk030072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 13:40:07 EDT --- Honestly, the last two paragraphs above the footnote were sufficient. But this needs to get into the actual spec, so that people who ask this question later can look at the package and understand what's going on. Were the spec commented to add that, I see no reason that I wouldn't approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271739.m9RHdk3W002743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-27 13:39:45 EDT --- CDDL as a patent grant is fine. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:45:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271745.m9RHjwrl031469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-27 13:45:57 EDT --- please look again http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput-0.6.1-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:47:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271747.m9RHlHVv004516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-27 13:47:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (*) e.g. "kcirbshooter is a fork of the game found at http://... which was done > to avoid confusion with the original Brickshooter(tm) game" -- Spot, what do > you think? Sure, that should be within the realm of fair use. ~spot -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:54:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271754.m9RHsXUL005703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 --- Comment #12 from Nils Philippsen 2008-10-27 13:54:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321634) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321634) Patch which allows setting of OPTFLAGS for the Makefile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 17:58:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271758.m9RHw6mw006560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 13:58:05 EDT --- @Nathaniel Indeed, I would say even that: your advices are not only welcomed, but they are really needed to define with you an sharp way to package libproxy. So this is an exchange in two ways And without your advices, there is low chance that the package will be provided within fedora. Also, I hope that this talk doesn't only serve Fedora. I've for example requested the OpenSUSE packager for advices, and I know he's following. So according to the quick advices received from the kde team. It is better to link directly to libproxy library. So I guess to use this spec solely. Now I just wonder if libproxy will be useable as is , since it will lack the related modules from within libproxy along with lack of support from the related components (control-center, neon, NetworkManager, xulrunner,yum , pirut etc), At least for our configuration tools in F-10. So for the long plan. I expect there is a need for a feature request to have most "internet application" to be converted/tested to libproxy support/compliance. Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-7.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 18:04:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271804.m9RI4bM4008079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 14:04:36 EDT --- so what output rpmlint on installed files ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 18:07:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271807.m9RI7xjk009190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-27 14:07:58 EDT --- I hope I've understood your request correctly ... SRPM: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem-31-1.fc10.src.rpm Spec: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem.spec * Mon Oct 27 2008 Richard Jones - 31-1 - Update the spec file with explanation of the 'Provides: mingw32(...)' lines for Windows system DLLs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 19:26:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271926.m9RJQhVX027027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 15:26:42 EDT --- While the %description seems to make sense, Summary: is, well, not terribly helpful. Is anyone supposed to know what PL_dirty is? Could we at least use what upstream has: Expose PL_dirty, the flag which marks global destruction or maybe just Expose the flag which marks global destruction which, while still not completely comprehensible to most folks, is at least understandable by most moderately experienced Perl programmers. Anyway, full review forthcoming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 19:31:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438406] Review Request: ufiformat - Disk formatting utility for USB floppy devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271931.m9RJVclc022378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438406 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 15:31:36 EDT --- Hmm, this seems to have fallen through the cracks. It looks like someone came along and added some needless bug alias which advanced the "last changed" date and made the ticket drop off of my "old tickets to look at" report. Oh, well. Anyway, Chris, did you still want to get this in? Could you post a link to your latest package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:02:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468753] New: Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468753 Summary: Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lpoetter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/nss-myhostname.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/nss-myhostname-0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: nss-myhostname is a plugin for the GNU Name Service Switch (NSS) functionality of the GNU C Library (glibc) providing host name resolution for the locally configured system hostname as returned by gethostname(2). A lot of software relies on that the local host name is resolvable via DNS to an IPv4 or IPv6 address. When using dynamic hostnames this is usually achieved by patching /etc/hosts which however is suboptimal since it requires a writable /etc file system and is fragile because the file might also be edited by the administrator. nss-myhostname simply returns the IPv4 address 127.0.0.2 (wich is on the local loopback) and the IPv6 address ::1 (which is the local host) for whatever system hostname is configured locally. Patching /etc/hostname is thus no longer necessary. --- When we make the system host name a bit more more dynamic this should allow us to still guarantee that the hostname stays resolvable under all circumstances without having to rewrite /etc/hosts all the time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 18:45:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271845.m9RIjKFp012805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-27 14:45:19 EDT --- Clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:29:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272029.m9RKTafD003126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #17 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-27 16:29:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Some notes > > ? License > - License tag can be okay with LGPLv2 as README file > declares so, however all files under src/ directories > are actually under LGPLv2+. > Would you ask upstream about this? (as it is okay > with LGPLv2, this is not a blocker) > Will do - will report back on this asap. > * Source tarball > - The tarball in the srpm differs from what I could > download from the URL written as %SOURCE > ------------------------------------------------------ > 514623 2008-06-10 05:21 gpp4-1.0.4-9.fc10.src/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz > 498933 2007-09-03 00:00 orig/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz > > 48931781425a5b79a8255ebefaed24b3 orig/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz > 7494566588545eb167b1c4c6e486cdf4 gpp4-1.0.4-9.fc10.src/gpp4-1.0.4.tar.gz > ------------------------------------------------------ > ah, stupid mistake on my part (was using a .tar.gz from a "make build"). Fixed. > * Linkage error > - rpmlint shows > ------------------------------------------------------ > gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 sincos > gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 sqrt > gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 rintf > gpp4.i386: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libgpp4.so.0.0.0 lrint > ------------------------------------------------------ > For packages providing -devel subpackage these rpmlint warnings > cannot be allowed because these will cause linkage error when > using these libraries. > I guess linking to libm.so (-lm) will remove these warnings. > Fixed. > > * Duplicate documents > - Generally there is no need to include a document file as %doc > to both main and -devel packages. > Fixed. > * Timestamps > ------------------------------------------------------ > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT install='install -p' > ------------------------------------------------------ > - This should be "INSTALL='install -p'". > Fixed. > ? Another rpmlint issue > ------------------------------------------------------ > gpp4-devel.i386: W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/gpp4-devel-1.0.4/doc/latex/csym_f_page.tex > ------------------------------------------------------ > - Well it may be preferable to convert this file to UTF-8, > however I am not sure if tex supports UTF-8 tex file > (at least it is well-known that platex does not support > Japanese UTF-8 tex files...) >From my experience with latex, a package has to be added to the document (utf8) in order for latex to understand it. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec updated srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-10.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272035.m9RKZK6X004752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 18:49:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454867] Review Request: kcirbshooter - A small puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810271849.m9RInpLI019405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454867 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(cheekyboinc at fores | |ightlinux.org) | --- Comment #13 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-27 14:49:50 EDT --- Hope all "problems" are fixed now! Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/kcirbshooter.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/kcirbshooter-0.04-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:35:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272035.m9RKZ27o010173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-27 16:35:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mmdb Short Description: macromolecular coordinate library Owners: timfenn Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:31:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272031.m9RKVtoq009609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #44 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-27 16:31:50 EDT --- submitted to F-9 as a newpackage request. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pmw-1.3.2-5.fc9,pymol-1.1-10.20081015svn3468.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:50:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441378] Review Request: smokeping - Latency Logging and Graphing System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272050.m9RKo50h007672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441378 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #36 from Terje R??sten 2008-10-27 16:50:03 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 20:47:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:47:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272047.m9RKlb3s007134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 16:47:36 EDT --- Well actually i was wrong. the rpath is in the test binary packages. So there is many ways to remove rpathes, it depends on the cause. In the F-8 x86 _64 case, there is a rpath defined which is removed if the configure script is regenerated or libtool patched. so either one or the others options works, and both fixes are valid (even if they is no rpath after all). There is a typo on the group for the test package, i plan to change it to Development/Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:08:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272108.m9RL88kR010718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:07:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468765] New: Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Summary: Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/hydrogen-drumkits-0-0.20080907.1.fc9.src.rpm Description: A collection of additional drumkits for the Hydrogen advanced drum machine for GNU/Linux. Notes: Hydrogen website provides a large collection of drumkits. However, most of these drumkits are licenseless. In this SRPM, I only included a subset which contains drumkits licensed under either GPL or LinuxTag Green OpenMusic License. The latter is not among the "Good Licenses" list in the guidelines hence I am blocking FE-Legal. The full text of this license can be found in the SRPM, and also at http://openmusic.linuxtag.org/green.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272117.m9RLH3eB012556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 17:17:02 EDT --- If this is your first package you need to seek a sponsor. I can't sponsor you but I can do the review. Please visit the following pages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request (-> FE-NEEDSPONSOR ;-) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:30:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272130.m9RLUCQv020228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 17:30:11 EDT --- Again some comments on your spec file - Source: - Please use 'Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' instead of a link to a mirror https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net - Patch1: wput-destdir.patch - The first patch is 'Patch0' - %changelog - To every release bump belongs an changelog entry. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:34:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272134.m9RLYd1c015321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Christopher D. Stover changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jamatos at fc.up.pt) --- Comment #7 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-27 17:34:38 EDT --- Thanks Hans, and yes, I should have mentioned the re-review in my first comment but didn't think to. Sorry to throw you off as well Jos?. Jos? -- I agree with you about the description. What do you think about: "A multi-purpose note-taking application that makes it easy to write down ideas as you think, and quickly find them later. You can collect, import or share any data, tag your notes and secure it some or all of it with passwords and/or encryption." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:32:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272132.m9RLWgu6020572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 17:32:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (-> FE-NEEDSPONSOR ;-) ) Forget this...you added the blocker already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:42:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272142.m9RLgJdN016764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 17:42:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I dint know how to tackle point 8 9 10 > > I dont think i know enough for sposnorship yet. Ankur, there's no need to rush, and we'll do it as slowly as you're comfortable with. Baby steps are good. If my requests are difficult to understand there's no shame at all asking for clarifications on the list. Someone else may answer using different words than mine and anyway that creates some on-line documentation for others new packagers (the list is international so no one will object if you have some problems with the pidgin English I use) Likewise, if you find some part of the wiki documentation obscure, just ask for help on the list, and propose a re-wording after you've understood the point. That's another great way to understand packaging and getting sponsored. If you're a bit intimidated by a public mailing list you can exchange private mails with Martin-Gomez Pablo or try to meet in an irc channel. He's also a novice packager, even if he's got a little more experience than you, so you may be a bit more comfortable exchanging tips with him. That being said: You still need to work on 14 8 9 10. Since you've written you've taken care of 8 9 10, you may have uploaded the wrong package version (or I can elaborate if you don't understand those points) 15. Also, you need to Buildrequire fontforge if you use it, otherwise the package won't build in koji or mock. Since you're not sponsored yet you can't test in koji so I strongly suggest installing mock on your system (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock) It's a great packager helper. 16. running rpmlint on the result produces those warnings cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1/COPYING cf-bonveno-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1/README To fix this warning you need something like for txt in COPYING README ; do sed 's/\r//' $txt > $txt.new touch -r $txt $txt.new mv $txt.new $txt done (the touch is necessary so you don't end up with new doc timestamps after each builds) You have more complete examples of txt files fixing in the gfs font packages. Just browse some specs there http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/ Mostly, we want new packagers to understand why their spec files contain X or Y, not just copy templates blindly, so please DO ask every time you feel you're performing black magic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:49:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272149.m9RLnAaW023245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-27 17:49:09 EDT --- fixed Can I start bumping versions later ? http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput-0.6.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272148.m9RLm2lS023142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 17:48:01 EDT --- You released a new version, .0.3.2 . This is a good point in time to bump the release of you spec file. After every change on your spec file you should bump the release. (-> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs ) I think that '--record=INSTALLED_FILES' is no longer needed because you are using 'globs' in the %files section now. I was able to build your packages but rpmlint complains... Source RPM: [rpm at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i python-suds* python-suds.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and just after the beginning of %install section. Use "rm -Rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT". 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. RPM: [rpm at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint -i python-suds* python-suds.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.1-1 0.3.1-2.fc9 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:54:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: 69oldstandard-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272154.m9RLsC2i018709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net | Flag| |needinfo?(sanjay_ankur at yaho | |o.co.in) --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Mailhot 2008-10-27 17:54:10 EDT --- This one is much nicer but you need to work on renaming the font at build time inside the sfds and also to work on the fontconfig rules. Please take some time with Pablo on those. Also it needs the same doc fix as bonveno. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 21:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272157.m9RLvxuM019427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-27 17:57:58 EDT --- > The first patch is 'Patch0' Just for the record: that's more a cosmetic / pedantic problem. rpm is very happy to use anything, as long as the definition of the patch (the PatchN line) and it's usage (the %PatchN line) correspond. But yes, for a first submission looking nice (from a cosmetic point of view) is important and could be a decision factor. More important: please preserve the older changelog entries when you/add make changes and create new releases of the spec. I am looking at releases 2 and 3 right now and I would have liked to know what was changed compared to the first ones. Especially as the _current_ changelog (the one from release 3) still says "Initial package." A correct changelog would have probably had something along: * Thu Oct 27 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-3 - start counting patches from 0 * Thu Oct 27 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-2 - fixes %%files, consistent use of macros<, other relevant changes, if any> * Thu Oct 26 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-1.0 - Initial package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:08:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461912] Review Request: puzzles - A collection of one-player puzzle games In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272208.m9RM8QdW021301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461912 --- Comment #10 from Victor Bogado 2008-10-27 18:08:25 EDT --- Damn I am distracted, I was sure that I had done everything, and ended up forgetting the most important point. :P I made the changes, and putted on the same bat-site. http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles-8200-3.bog9.src.rpm http://bogado.net/rpm/puzzles.spec I installed the games-menus and it is good. I was thinking if the package could be divided into several sub packages, one for each game and a master-package that could install all the mini-games, the only problem is that I don't know how to create the sub-packages based on what binaries the compilation produces. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:13:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272213.m9RMDbIM022160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 18:13:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Can I start bumping versions later ? I'm not talking about the version of the source. The 'Release' is for the spec file. Again changelog...in your lasted spec file is only *ONE* changelog entry. If your Release is '3' there have to be '3' entries. Your spec file should contain. For the reviewers it's much easier to keep track of the changes. %changelog * Mon Oct 27 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-3 - Fix Source0 - Rename Patch1 to Patch0 * Mon Oct 27 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-2 - Changes acc. #468633 Comment #1 * Thu Oct 26 2008 Itamar Reis Peixoto - 0.6.1-1 - Initial package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:19:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272219.m9RMJHti023053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #14 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-27 18:19:16 EDT --- Cancel fedora-cvs request flag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:18:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272218.m9RMIc4n029237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-27 18:18:36 EDT --- Is there any specific issue you can show me that needs to be addressed as a reason for you to have this package re-reviewed? That could help me in getting the package better beforehand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:22:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272222.m9RMMhDE030130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 18:22:41 EDT --- Did you ever get your account set up? I don't see any names matching yours in the system. I'm going to be on vacation for a bit starting later this week, so if you want to get this set up before I go, please do the setup on your side soon. If you need help with this, just let me know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:27:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272227.m9RMR2ZU031014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #26 from Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-10-27 18:27:01 EDT --- Re comment #20: > If you build a package against ghc-zlib, will it be required at runtime? No. These Haskell packages are essentially devel packages. > There's no reason to include the LICENSE file twice, is there? No. If that's happening, it's a mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:40:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:40:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272240.m9RMeoPT026789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 18:40:49 EDT --- rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:43:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272243.m9RMh748026980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 18:43:06 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=908019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:43:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272243.m9RMhcew001357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 18:43:37 EDT --- rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 22:50:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:50:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455165] Review-Request: maatkit - Essential command-line utilities for MySQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272250.m9RMoixw002552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455165 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Sven Lankes 2008-10-27 18:50:42 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [x] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License: GPLv2 or Artistic [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: dc4110317c8c9e0c0bc8b53998cbd0b40048fd73 SOURCES/maatkit-1972.tar.gz [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [!] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: devel/x86_64 [?] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Maatkit-2442 has been released in the meantime. I have tried building a 2442 using the submitted specfile and that rpm also passes all tests, so I suggest bumping the version to the current release. Not a reason to hold up the review though - so: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:09:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272309.m9RN9lkg031200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #10 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-27 19:09:45 EDT --- My nose smells missing BR: gnutls-devel. And I have a feeling that gettext is needed, too , despite the fact that the locale files get created (the configure script complains about missing gettext) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:12:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272312.m9RNCRgq005996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #17 from Tim Potter 2008-10-27 19:12:26 EDT --- I'm installing a F9 kvm as I type this! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466658] Review Request: VisualBoyAdvance - Nintendo Gameboy (,Advance,Color) Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272335.m9RNZjtg003094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466658 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-27 19:35:44 EDT --- Andrea: I'm waiting on reply from spot before I work on this too much. If the lawyers say no, I'll continue the review request at RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:34:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272334.m9RNYI7a009095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-27 19:34:17 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:46:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272346.m9RNkvIv004701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 19:46:56 EDT --- rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:49:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272349.m9RNn9Mg004840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 19:49:09 EDT --- rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272346.m9RNksa0004673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 19:46:53 EDT --- rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Oct 27 23:47:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:47:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810272347.m9RNlu46011245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 19:47:56 EDT --- rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280005.m9S05AfL007459@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 20:05:09 EDT --- gettext is definitely missing and adding gnutls will be a good idea ;-) BuildRequires: gettext BuildRequires: gnutls-devel Itamar, take a look into the log at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=908022&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:10:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280010.m9S0AP7V014717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 --- Comment #16 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-27 20:10:24 EDT --- Sorry, I've not seen the private email... You should navigate to the appropriate branches of the CVS checkout on your local system and issue a make build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:11:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461400] Review Request: cherokee - Flexible and Fast Webserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280011.m9S0BtVj015037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461400 --- Comment #17 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-27 20:11:55 EDT --- I was too soon pressing 'commit'; after successful builds for F-8 and/or F-9, go to http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/, login and create a new update using the build tags shown at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji (login and view Summary for your latest builds) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:17:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280017.m9S0H3xD009196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 20:17:02 EDT --- rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:17:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280017.m9S0H5B1015824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 20:17:05 EDT --- rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:18:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280018.m9S0I9Di015956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 20:18:09 EDT --- rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:18:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280018.m9S0I6ad015926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-27 20:18:06 EDT --- rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280017.m9S0HvIU015896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-27 20:17:56 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file Requires: ncurses - not needed because ncurses-devel is a BR make - should be make %{?_smp_mflags} acc. to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#.25build_section chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/shed - Is this really needed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:23:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280023.m9S0NUqe010225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #18 from Tim Potter 2008-10-27 20:23:29 EDT --- OK that was easy. I've updated the %files list for the egg info and uploaded some new versions: http://samba.org/~tpot/python-pywbem/python-pywbem-0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm http://samba.org/~tpot/python-pywbem/python-pywbem.spec (This isn't the actual 0.7 version. I've uploaded the latest subversion trunk for review purposes. A new release should happen in a few days). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:28:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:28:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467535] Review Request: SocksiPy - Easy to use SOCKS client support for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280028.m9S0SYxv017632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467535 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-27 20:28:33 EDT --- Closing as the reviewers already have a large enough queue of packages to review and I have no immediate personal need of SocksiPy. I will leave the spec/srpm in case someone wants to adopt this in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:31:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280031.m9S0VxVT011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #8 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-27 20:31:58 EDT --- Denis Leroy - Thanks for taking the time to address some of the concerns. Spot - Have you confirmed that the license incompatibility between CDDL and GPL does not affect us here? I am concerned that we are setting precedent for vendors to create proprietary drivers that use the fuse interface to bypass GPL requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:32:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464822] Review Request: clojure - A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280032.m9S0W6YY018206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464822 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-27 20:32:05 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=67430 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:47:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280047.m9S0lkZp013894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 00:46:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280046.m9S0kfC6013790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen 2008-10-27 20:46:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Is there no kind of runtime/-devel split of these packages? Current releases of ghc do not support shared libraries on Linux (though this may change in come releases). > I'm not sure I'd know how to find a test suite if one were included, so I can't really check that. I don't think there is one included in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:06:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280206.m9S26Xfe025728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |69oldstandard-fonts - Old |oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old |Standard Fonts |Standard Fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:13:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468797] New: Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Summary: Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/jrosetta.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jrosetta-1.0.1-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:24:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:24:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458785] Review Request: libev - High-performance event loop/event model with lots of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280224.m9S2O4eZ002586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458785 --- Comment #15 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-27 22:24:03 EDT --- This package doesn't seems imported - Why ? perl-EV has been updated to 3.45, does libev plans to be updated ? (upstream website is down currently). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 02:48:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 22:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280248.m9S2mUF7007476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 Michal Jaegermann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michal at harddata.com --- Comment #6 from Michal Jaegermann 2008-10-27 22:48:28 EDT --- As announced ("Fixed in rev386") in http://mail.gnome.org/archives/sawfish-list/2008-October/msg00032.html that source version fixes broken GtkCombos and that makes possible to pick up different themes again through sawfish-ui. The package from comment #5 is affected by this bug and replacing rep-gtk indeed fixes it. Also the corresponding spec relies in %file section on %{_host} to come as %{_arch}-redhat-linux-gnu. On the current rawhide it shows up as %{arch}-unknown-linux-gnu instead and the spec breaks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 03:19:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280319.m9S3JSl9012266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-27 23:19:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > gettext is definitely missing and adding gnutls will be a good idea ;-) > > BuildRequires: gettext > BuildRequires: gnutls-devel > Done http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/wput/wput-0.6.1-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 03:29:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280329.m9S3TJdo013799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-27 23:29:18 EDT --- I had hoped to get that done before leaving work, but.... rpmlint says: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction. which indeed is long, but not really under your control. Really, the only issue I see is the summary, which I trust you'll fix up to something comprehensible before you check in. * source files match upstream: 1c6665a98a7ee12d2e0ca926b800561f8ff4ea36daf487c02030a12f7a2b959c Devel-GlobalDestruction-0.02.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. X summary is seriously cryptic. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: GlobalDestruction.so()(64bit) perl(Devel::GlobalDestruction) = 0.02 perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction = 0.02-1.fc10 perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction(x86-64) = 0.02-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Sub::Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=4, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:06:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280406.m9S46xmY013104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-28 00:06:58 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=905301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:06:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-StrictConstructor OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SRPM URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor-0.07-1.fc9.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/review/perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor.spec Description: Simply loading this module makes your constructors "strict". If your constructor is called with an attribute init argument that your class does not declare, then it calls "Carp::confess()". This is a great way to catch small typos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280427.m9S4RmQc022718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:27:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280427.m9S4RmQe022694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-28 00:27:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor Short Description: Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:38:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280438.m9S4c3Jo024224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 00:38:01 EDT --- I think this package now belongs to a 3rd party repo since it now supports non-free formats such as .rar It can be patched to support only free formats and a non-free subpackage can be made and put in a 3rd party repo but that's unnecessarily more work. I can take the package over at rpmfusion now if you close the bug here. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 04:43:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280443.m9S4hS5I025030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2008-10-28 00:43:28 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-1.9.7-0.3.b1dev.r5627.fc9.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec * Tue Oct 28 2008 Luke Macken 1.9.7.0.3.b1dev.r5627 - Update to a svn snapshot to support tgext.authorization instead of tg.ext.repoze.who * Mon Oct 27 2008 Luke Macken 1.9.7-0.2.b1 - Update to 1.9.7b1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280504.m9S54spI028612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 --- Comment #16 from Marc Bradshaw 2008-10-28 01:04:53 EDT --- thanks all, imported and building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:04:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:04:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280504.m9S54nPA028576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 01:04:47 EDT --- Nevermind, even bash-completion has references to non-free packages such as unrar. Since that package is allowed in Fedora, this one can be too. I will take the package over here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:06:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280506.m9S56MT8022767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Marc Bradshaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:15:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280515.m9S5Fosv024325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:15:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280515.m9S5FoZ9024297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:15:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] New: Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 Summary: Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-devtools.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-devtools-1.9.7-0.2.a4.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains various paster commands and templates used for TurboGears2 development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:19:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280519.m9S5Ji88024758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:19:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468805] Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280519.m9S5JhjT024730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468805 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280519.m9S5JDMV024644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2008-10-28 01:19:12 EDT --- This has been obsoleted by tgext.authorization (Bug #468805) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:19:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280519.m9S5JEZH024673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 468228, which changed state. Bug 468228 Summary: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:17:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468805] New: Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468805 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-authorization.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-authorization-0.9-0.1.a1dev.r117.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sample repoze.who middleware config and plugins for TG2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:21:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468806] New: Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Summary: Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-dbsprockets.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-dbsprockets-0.5-0.1.dev.r411.fc9.src.rpm Description: A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:22:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468806] Review Request: python-dbsprockets - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database definitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280522.m9S5M5JC031722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468806 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 05:22:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 01:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280522.m9S5M63Z031746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 06:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280655.m9S6tM05006718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 --- Comment #2 from Christopher D. Stover 2008-10-28 02:55:21 EDT --- Hans, I cleaned a few things up in the spec file. Results from rpmlint are still the same as from my first comment. I hope all went well with finishing things up before the target date last night. Chris spec URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pio1hMuKG1M5NKTtICmuij3xUE-hQvQaQ5suC-qVERor-0TGvGleJUJa0QBfJi6sZskOTBt18qhE3klsVrmc2uw/barry.spec?download SPRM URL: http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p3zn76g7EvaApa6b-6TakgE-H9fd7Q1WQBI-rLpC5oVHDkc963TkKlUSTV4Jxt7IY8QObfn1UXw4nXLxiBnFLrA/barry-0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm?download -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:00:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280800.m9S80b45023019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-28 04:00:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Well actually i was wrong. the rpath is in the test binary packages. > So there is many ways to remove rpathes, it depends on the cause. OK. Actually I hadn't built the test binaries, only the library. So you are right, you need to have the libtool patch. > There is a typo on the group for the test package, i plan to change it to > Development/Tools OK. I tested the build without the zbib patch, and I don't any errors from rpmlint you mentioned (using zlib-1.2.3-18.fc9.x86_64). I still don't think you need to do any special doxygen / pdf / html -related stuff, please remove it and add latex to BRs as described in comment #5. Also, you shouldn't change the timestamps of the HTML documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:49:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280849.m9S8naDv025363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280847.m9S8lZSU031326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 04:47:34 EDT --- Thanks for the changes. I will make a full review today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:48:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280848.m9S8mBl6031393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 08:51:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280851.m9S8puSw032268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:03:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280903.m9S93xJE028148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-28 05:03:58 EDT --- Hi, Some of the source/example files had the wrong permissions (executable bit on). rpmlint outputs some warnings: cddlib-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/src-mathlink2/mathlink.h cddlib-devel.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/cddlib-devel-094f/src-mathlink/mathlink.h ..... Specifying 0644 for files in defattr will fix the issue. This package does not have any executable file, anyway. Even if it had, you could an extra defattr or a per file permission change. %files devel %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc doc/cddlibman.pdf %doc examples* src* %{_includedir}/*.h %{_libdir}/libcdd.a %{_libdir}/libcddgmp.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:20:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:20:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468823] Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280920.m9S9KYLd031613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Akira TAGOH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:19:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468823] New: Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823 Summary: Review Request: hanazono-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface TrueType font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tagoh at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/hanazono-fonts/hanazono-fonts-20081012-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Hanazono Mincho typeface is a Japanese TrueType font that developed with a support of Grant-in-Aid for Publication of Scientific Research Results from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the International Research Institute for Zen Buddhism (IRIZ), Hanazono University. also with volunteers who work together on glyphwiki.org. This font supports: - 6359 characters in JIS X 0208:1997 - 3695 characters in JIS X 0213:2004 - 22 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+9FA6~U+9FBB) - 8 characters in Unicode 5.1 (U+9FBC~U+9FC3) - 16 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.1:2005 (U+31C0~U+31CF) - 20 characters in ISO/IEC 10646:2003/Amd.3:2008 (U+31D0~U+31E3) - 84 characters in IBM extensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:17:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280917.m9S9HtV4004686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 05:17:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * License needs updating to new format - This was fixed from Tom "spot" Callaway http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewvc/devel/rdesktop/rdesktop.spec?r1=1.30&r2=1.31 > * Source0 does not contain full URL - not fixed > * Desktop file not installed correctly - not fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:34:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246525] Review Request: libMini - A high-performance terrain rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280934.m9S9Ym8B007933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246525 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-28 05:34:45 EDT --- 1* Fix License to LGPLv2+ I don't think there is a LGPLv2 short name as every files under 2.1 should be redistributable under 3 with the LGPL case (in the contrary of the GPL). 2* -devel requires too much: from what is exposed to the API (grep include /usr/include/mini/* -R ) Only Requires: libGL-devel libGLU-devel curl-devel should be needed (along with pkgconfig). So I wonder if -lglut and requires x11 xmu from Mini.pc shoudn't be moved to Libs.private instead. 3* - the package install headers in the default include directory: (includedir=/usr/include from Mini.pc) This is perfectly possible , but IMO produce common error since pkg-config CFLAGS detection can be avoided by the dependant package. If used accurately pkg-config provides a level of abstraction to provides for the headers in case of dual API (LibMini-1.0.pc can be used to access headers in /usr/include/libMini-1.0/mini/mini.h along with the previous API) This is just a warning 4* There is a problem at link time indeed. (where sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool seems a correct workaround for now). 2* will need to be investigated with a dependent package and 1* could be fixed then. 3* 4* are optionals and can be fixed later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:39:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468556] Review Request: rubygem-cgi_multipart_eof_fix - Multipart EOF fix for mongrel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280939.m9S9dkqk002625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468556 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-28 05:39:45 EDT --- Deferred I only notice now this is part of the mongrel package already -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:40:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246527] Review Request: vtp - VTP (Virtual Terrain Project) libraries and applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280940.m9S9e020008940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246527 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-28 05:39:58 EDT --- Do we have an update for this package ? This would help to close libMini review ---------- starting review ---------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 09:54:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246524] Review Request: libquikgrid - The QuikGrid generator and contouring routine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810280954.m9S9sYl1012308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246524 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-28 05:54:32 EDT --- rpmlint on installed package: libquikgrid.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libquikgrid.so.0.0.0 _ZN8QuikGrid8DoLineToEffi Can this be fixed easily ? Any news from buildtools integration ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 10:19:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281019.m9SAJVTp011142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #22 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-28 06:19:30 EDT --- Sorry, SRPM URL should have been http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 10:18:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281018.m9SAIo9I017639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #21 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-28 06:18:49 EDT --- I revised the packaging strategy using the spec samples from Mamoru; New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-5.fc9.src.rpm I'm not sure whether I should package the tests provided with the gem in -doc or in the base package... Please advise. rpmlint is silent koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=908852 - dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=908857 - dist-f10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=908870 - dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=908873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 10:30:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458440] Review Request: bluemindo - Simple audio player in python/GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281030.m9SAUZYX013518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458440 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 06:30:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > rpmlint reports 9 errors: "script-without-shebang", should I patch to correct > these errors ? (these shebang aren't needed at all) You can remove the shebang in the spec file or make a patch whatever you like. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_files Just some quick comments on your spec file. Macros - You are using a lot of macros. IMHO, you should consider to drop them. Your spec file will be more readable. Even you miss one ( %{appdir}/locale/bluemindo.pot -> podir?) ;-) BuildRequires: - Python packages should be sure to have: BuildRequires: python https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python %build section - What is %{nil}? Source0: http://www.codingteam.net/upload/77133a-bluemindo-0.2.1.tar.gz - You can switch to 'Source0: http://www.codingteam.net/upload/77133a-%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz' this way you haven't to take care of this after a new release of the source. %files - You can add all %doc entries on one line %doc AUTHORS CHANGELOG... but that only cosmetical %changelog - for correct changelog entries, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 10:40:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:40:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281040.m9SAevEi015401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-28 06:40:57 EDT --- rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 10:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 06:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281044.m9SAiurR015799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-28 06:44:56 EDT --- rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 11:40:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468846] New: Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468846 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-az.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-az-0.20040827-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 11:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468848] New: Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468848 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-fa-0.20070116-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Farsi hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 11:42:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] New: Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-csb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-csb-0.20050311-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Kashubian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 12:00:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281200.m9SC0vbA004132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 08:00:55 EDT --- Just some small comments on your spec file %description section - There is a blank line before the description starts. "Blank lines are assumed to separate paragraphs..." from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo#Spec_file_pieces_explained - IMHO, Ubuntu should been remove from the description because we don't use the 'Ubuntu Netbook userspace stack' in Fedora, or do we? Version 0.4.1 was released -> https://edge.launchpad.net/~netbook-remix-team/+archive -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 12:55:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281255.m9SCtKau015459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 Jos? Matos changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jamatos at fc.up.pt) | --- Comment #8 from Jos? Matos 2008-10-28 08:55:19 EDT --- I like the new formulation. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 13:28:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281328.m9SDSboV015350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 09:28:36 EDT --- By permissions, I am referring to the permissions of the files owned by the package: %files %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) %doc CHANGELOG COPYING README %{_bindir}/%{name}* %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* What I'm asking is, do you really want parprouted to be executable by root? If not, : %files %defattr(0744, root, root, -) %doc CHANGELOG COPYING README %{_bindir}/%{name}* %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 13:40:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281340.m9SDe3Zn017547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 09:40:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I made another review, > but this one required some modifications > in the spec file, because the packager suppressed > the generation of the examples. In my opinion, > examples should always be supplied, unless there > is a good reason for not packaging them. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 I'll reserve comment until a full review is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 14:56:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281456.m9SEuC2D032765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #2 from Adam Miller 2008-10-28 10:56:11 EDT --- Fixed the Requires as well as the make. The chmod 0755 is something I added because without it rpmlint claimed the the resulting binary was not being stripped and after reading up on the issue a bit I found documentation stating that rpmbuild will automatically strip executables and that explicit calls to strip in a .spec was frowned upon. I uploaded to new SRPM and new spec to: Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed-1.13-1.src.rpm Thank you for your input and please feel free to ask more questions or inform me of any more issues you might see with the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 14:59:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281459.m9SExVaL000649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(mtasaka at ioa.s.u-t | |okyo.ac.jp) | --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 10:59:29 EDT --- Well, from very quick glance: * Using /var/www is not allowed on Fedora https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Web_Applications * License tag should be "GPLv2+" Note that only putting GPLv2 license text does not mean that the license is under GPLv2: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ * Usually dependencies between main package and subpackages must be EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines "MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages..." This mentions only main <-> -devel packages, however this should usually be applied to any binary rpms generated from the same srpm) * Virtual Provides must usually be EVR specific (Vitual Provides without EVR information caused upgrading path problem many times...) * "Requires: genome" is redundant when "Requires: gnome-lib" is present (currently, however see below) * I guess that the dependency between genome and genome-lib is opposite * You have to write "BuildArch: noarch" only on the main package (and don't have to write on each subpackages) * Use "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)", not rubygem-rake. c.f. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides - By the way "BuildRequires: rubygem" is redundant when "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)" is present. * When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps * The scripts related to SysVinit script are wrong at several points. Also some Requires(preun) or so are missing. Please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax * Please make it sure that directories which are created when installing a package are correctly owned by the package. There are some directories which are not owned by any packages or when the package is installed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories * We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) Also on some subpackages %defattr is completely missing (please use rpmlint to detect this type of packagins error) * Files under %_datadir/doc are automatically marked as %doc * %_sysconfdir/init.d must be %_initrddir https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem * /var must be %_localstatedir or so: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * Please use macros consistently. For example at one place %{_bindir} is used (this is no problem because %{_bindir} is expanded as /usr/bin) where at other place /%{_bindir} (i.e. //usr/bin) is used. I just glanced at your spec file quickly and examined license issue and have not checked the details of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 14:48:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281448.m9SEmhpj005202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #7 from Jeff Ortel 2008-10-28 10:48:42 EDT --- Well, 0.3.2 is a development release and is only in the hosted /releases directory so that it can be downloaded from the project site. I assumed that in terms of getting suds into fedora, it would be better to work with the latest GA branch (0.3.1). For package management in Fedora, I would always bump the version or release if anything change in the package (including the spec). I updated the spec and after adding "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" as the first line in %install, rpmlint has 0 errors and 0 warnings. I did run rpmlint before requesting the package review but I didn't understand the warning and figured (hoped) you'd help as you did. SPEC URL: http://svn.fedorahosted.org/svn/suds/tags/release-0.3.1/python-suds.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/suds/python-suds-0.3.1-3.fc8.src.rpm I'm perusing sponsorship and waiting for response. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:30:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281530.m9SFUPUj013942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kwizart at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #13 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-28 11:30:23 EDT --- I cannot review this. Actually I'm facing the same problem with perl-EV (#448613) And I'm not strong enough in perl to enforce the request of having libraries built shared. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447954] Review Request: perl-Math-Cephes - Perl interface to the cephes math library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281535.m9SFZ9D3015024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447954 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:40:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:40:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281540.m9SFeEH0008815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 11:40:12 EDT --- Some missing deps... http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=909329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:41:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281541.m9SFffvM009050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 11:41:40 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:50:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281550.m9SFoXRK010738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #12 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-28 11:50:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > By permissions, I am referring to the permissions of the files owned by the > package: > > %files > %defattr(-, root, root, 0755) I suppose this statement means: files: (-) keep original file permissions (mode) owner: root group: root directories: 755 (default permission or "mode" for directories) http://rpm5.org/docs/max-rpm.pdf (page 192) > %doc CHANGELOG COPYING README > %{_bindir}/%{name}* > %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* > > What I'm asking is, do you really want parprouted to be executable by root? > > If not, : > > %files > %defattr(0744, root, root, -) This statement would set 744 for all files of the package. Therefore, all files would have the execution bit on for root (the owner). Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:52:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281552.m9SFqh6G018423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 11:52:42 EDT --- .a libs are supposed to be +x, I think this problem is easier to fix in prep stage. New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 15:54:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281554.m9SFsbwm018661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #46 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-28 11:54:36 EDT --- Did you build the EL-5 branch yet? The packages aren't available yet in EPEL testing.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 16:07:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281607.m9SG72vl020909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 12:07:01 EDT --- Sorry, I meant: %files %defattr(-, root, root, -) %doc CHANGELOG COPYING README %attr(744,root,root,-)%{_bindir}/%{name}* %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 16:08:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468517] Review Request: saoimage - Utility for displaying astronomical images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281608.m9SG8BXs020983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468517 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 12:08:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I quite don't understand if you still insist on not owning the package. In case > yes, I don't see what would we gain here, except for having a slight > possibility of the package leaving a stale unowned directory. * Please be consistent with other packages - Currently only 1 (binary) package (shared-mime-info) owns /usr/share/mime - While 81 packages have files under /usr/share/mime/packages (including shared-mime-info) If you want to make it sure that /usr/share/mime is owned by some packages when shared-mime-info is not installed (current packaging guidelines is against this), this is for packaging guidelines issue (you can suggest that this directory must be in filesystem package or so). ref: - 18 packages (??) own /usr/share/icons/hicolor - While 637 packages have files under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps * And I don't think that XML files under the directory are useful when shared-mime-info is not installed. > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. I don't see this SEGV on -3, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 16:29:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281629.m9SGTqgW024531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 12:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-6.fc9.src.rpm - So for license "GPLv2+" for ext/q_parser.c can be ignored by Bison exception term (you can regard that ext/q_parser.c are under "BSD or GPLv2+") Please use "BSD and MIT" for license tag. > I'm not sure whether I should package the tests provided with the gem in -doc > or in the base package... Please advise. I would move these files to -doc (if I create -doc subpackage), however this is under your choise. By the way: - I recommend to use %{version} tag for Source0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D Also, the number "28549" in URL of Source0 will change each time the version is upgraded. If you don't like this, gem has alternative URL: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem - Please make it sure that the directory %{geminstdir} itself is also owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 16:49:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281649.m9SGnU87028084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-28 12:49:29 EDT --- python-rabbyt-0.8.2-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-rabbyt-0.8.2-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 16:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 12:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281652.m9SGqdRN028729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-28 12:52:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > .a libs are supposed to be +x, I think this problem is easier to fix in prep > stage. New URLs: > http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec > http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-3.fc9.src.rpm Not really. .a libs, generally, are 644 (ls -al /usr/lib64/*.a or /usr/lib/*.a) But your way works, and you also removed the .* files, which was really good. I am going to give you a practice review, which is NOT an official review. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [lua:~/rhrpms] rpmlint cddlib-devel-094f-3.fc8.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Clean. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK. - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). OK. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK. - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Builds on F-8 x86_64 and F-9 i386 (using mock). - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 NA. - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA. - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig NA. - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. NA. - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. OK. - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK. - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK. - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK. - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . OK. - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) Maybe. There is a considerable amount of files. - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK. - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. The package contains basically two static libraries. The spec has a "Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}" clause. This is fine for me. - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA. - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA. - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. NA. - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NA. - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK. - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. OK. Summary: the documentation contains several examples, which could be in a separate doc package, for clarity. See item above. But this is my personal opinion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:03:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281703.m9SH3ag4022577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-28 13:03:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Sorry, I meant: > > %files > %defattr(-, root, root, -) > %doc CHANGELOG COPYING README > %attr(744,root,root,-)%{_bindir}/%{name}* > %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* I can change it, but this produces exactly the same result as using (-,root, root, 0755). The directories were already 755. I also finished the review of the cddlib package. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 and I cannot go any further. It would be good to have you opinion there. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:01:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281701.m9SH1oBl030598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 13:01:47 EDT --- Well, * This package itself is okay * Your another review request (webmin) is rather a large package. While there are some apparent issues to fix for current webmin package, however it may take not a few time before I can review the package. So for now I will proceed sponsor process and hope that someone else will review webmin package (before I try to review webmin package). I will pay attention to webmin review request anyway. So: -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (python-sybase) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:18:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457925] Review Request: biniax - A unique arcade logic game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281718.m9SHIguM025284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457925 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:20:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:20:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281720.m9SHKGdZ001306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #14 from Martin-Gomez Pablo 2008-10-28 13:20:15 EDT --- Some comments: 1- When you make a change, you increase the "Dist" number, not the "Version" one's. 2- Paste the following after the "%setup" for i in $(ls OldStandard*.ttf.sfd); do sed -i -e 's/OldStandardTT/OldStandardSFD/' -e 's/Old Standard TT/Old Standard SFD/' $i; done It's the renaming of the font just before the building. 3- A little improvement to the fontconfig rules, add the following : Old Standard Old Standard SFD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:23:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281723.m9SHNfI4001808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 13:23:40 EDT --- With fixing missing BuildRequires (automake, libtool), this package is okay. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (gpp4) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:33:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281733.m9SHXOn1028183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 13:33:23 EDT --- So it does. Never mind. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:36:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281736.m9SHaSif028902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 13:36:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Not really. .a libs, generally, are 644 (ls -al /usr/lib64/*.a or /usr/lib/*.a) Ah, when I checked a random lib I must have found a lib that was 755. My mistake! I am glad this way works ok also. I looked at the examples and source and they are only a few megs uncompressed and probably compress well, so I don't think it's a big deal having it all in one package. Besides, to use the library (i.e. link against it, it's static) you probably want the documentation anyway. In the future doing reviews you might just omit the stuff that's OK or N/A and just tell me the stuff I'm doing wrong :D. But I appreciate the (practice) review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281752.m9SHqOL2007145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 13:52:22 EDT --- rpmlint not clean for me: cddlib-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package This debuginfo package contains no files. This is often a sign of binaries being unexpectedly stripped too early during the build, rpmbuild not being able to strip the binaries, the package actually being a noarch one but erratically packaged as arch dependent, or something else. Verify what the case is, and if there's no way to produce useful debuginfo out of it, disable creation of the debuginfo package. The file: examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This copyright notice must accompany all copies. Paulo, grep -i license * and */* and */*/* . . .etc will help you find this sort of thing. Why -devel and not -static, as there are no solibs? I'm ok with the docs/examples being bundled, they're not that big, left to packager discretion IMHO. Otherwise, a good review. Checking mock BRs, will be slightly delayed there due to system issues. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:00:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467051] Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281800.m9SI0XT7001281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 14:00:32 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:00:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281800.m9SI09QA001133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841 | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 14:00:08 EDT --- Seems good except for: * Timestamp on original tarball is not kept https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Please re-download the original tarball by: $ wget -N http://gael.roualland.free.fr/ifstat/ifstat-1.1.tar.gz for example. * Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. * Please change the release number to X%{?dist} (2%{?dist}, for example) (I guess you want to do so after the review is passed) Well, + This package itself is now okay (but please fix above) + You have also other review requests, which seems good to some extent Okay. -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (itstat) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji) ". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 17:57:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281757.m9SHvXQA008359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 Derek Martin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code at pizzashack.org --- Comment #17 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 13:57:31 EDT --- Actually, rssh should *absolutely* *not* be added to /etc/shells. This file lists shells which should be considered valid login shells. rssh is not, nor is it intended to be, a valid login shell... it's a specialized shell intended to provide extremely restricted access. One consequence of adding rssh to /etc/shells is that if the machine in question has an FTP server configured, then depending on which server and how it is configured, any user whose shell is rssh might be granted access to the FTP service unintentionally. This would defeat the purpose of configuring the user's shell to be rssh! Other installed programs may also check /etc/shells for a similar purpose. Please remove that functionality from the post and postun portions of the spec file. [I am the original author of RSSH.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:01:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281801.m9SI1Sjd001549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 14:01:27 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:04:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281804.m9SI4OXZ001820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 14:04:24 EDT --- In this case let us move on with 0.3.1. Sorry Jeff, again changelog...https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelo gs . I'm not sure about the space in front of every line. For me it looks a bit unusual. (In reply to comment #6) > > RPM: > > [rpm at laptop024 noarch]$ rpmlint -i python-suds* > > python-suds.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.1-1 0.3.1-2.fc9 > > The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not > > coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. > > > > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. With an updated changelog this warning will pass away. Please preserve the older changelog entries when you/add make changes and create new releases of the spec when you fix/change something. In your latest spec file is only *one* changelog entry. If your 'Release' is '3' there have to be '3' entries. For the reviewers it's much easier to keep track of the changes because often they want to know what exactly has changed. A correct changelog would have probably had something along: %changelog * Fri Oct 10 2008 jortel - 0.3.1-3 - add "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" to install * Fri Oct 10 2008 jortel - 0.3.1-2 - Changes acc. #466496 Comment #1 * Fri Oct 10 2008 jortel - 0.3.1-1 - Extends the support for multi-port services introduced earlier. This addition, provides for multiple services to define the *same* method and suds will handle it properly. See section 'SERVICES WITH MULTIPLE PORTS:' - Add support for multi-document document/literal soap binding style. See section 'MULTI-DOCUMENT Docuemnt/Literal:' - Add support for (xs:group, xs:attributeGroup) tags. - Add Client.last_sent() and Client.last_received(). The changelog entry for the next version, 0.3.2, will be ...com> - 0.3.2-1 . The relase will be resetted to 0. After that fix, I think it's time for a full review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:09:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281809.m9SI9x4f010226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pablo.martin-gomez at laposte. | |net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:05:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281805.m9SI57Hx009713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:17:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281817.m9SIHELp011679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 Martin-Gomez Pablo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:32:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467051] Review Request: arp-scan - scan network using ARP protocol. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281832.m9SIW3Lw007085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467051 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-28 14:32:03 EDT --- arp-scan alrealy exist in fedora, but is an old version. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467295 is possible to co-maintain it or something ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:34:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281834.m9SIYgZu007299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-28 14:34:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #21) > > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-6.fc9.src.rpm > - So for license "GPLv2+" for ext/q_parser.c can be ignored by Bison exception > term > (you can regard that ext/q_parser.c are under "BSD or GPLv2+") This is "MIT or GPLv2+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:35:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281835.m9SIZnCd015385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #18 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 14:35:48 EDT --- Some additional examples of badness that can occur if rssh is listed in /etc/shells: A malicious user could walk up to someone's terminal while they are away (or even not looking), quickly run chsh (setting it to rssh), and log the user out, effectively denying them login access to the machine. GDM will populate the user browser with an entry for that user, despite the fact that they will be unable to log in. Sendmail may allow users to execute arbitrary programs via .forward if their shell is rssh and it is listed in /etc/shells. getusershell() will return incorrect information about which shells are valid login shells. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 18:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281850.m9SIokKn010748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #47 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-28 14:50:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > Did you build the EL-5 branch yet? The packages aren't available yet in EPEL > testing.. Ah, had my plague client misconfigured. Fixed and builds submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:12:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:12:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281912.m9SJCbXx015059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 15:12:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > cddlib-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo suggests I should look for -s being passed to gcc or ld, or strip being called somewhere. I'm now building in mock to be able to grep over a build.log for these. > The file: > examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m > Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: > > This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. > Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This > copyright notice must accompany all copies. Good spot. Will rm in prep. > Why -devel and not -static, as there are no solibs? "2. Static libraries only. When a package only provides static libraries you can place all the static library files in the *-devel subpackage. When doing this you also must have a virtual Provide for the *-static package." from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries My personal reason? There are header files too, therefore it's useful for devel. > I'm ok with the docs/examples being bundled, they're not that big, left to > packager discretion IMHO. > > Otherwise, a good review. Checking mock BRs, will be slightly delayed there > due to system issues. :( Thanks for helping Paulo out. I appreciate the input from both of you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281925.m9SJPBkk017601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Ville-Pekka Vainio changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Ville-Pekka Vainio 2008-10-28 15:25:09 EDT --- As it's my first review, I'll do a checklist style thing also, just to be sure I haven't forgotten anything. - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review - OK, no output. - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK, it's also similar to all the other vdr plugins already in Fedora - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec - OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK. README says "Distributed under GPL", so GPL+ is OK, GPLv2 is in %doc as COPYING - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English - OK, as far as I can judge - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review - OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL - OK - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture - OK, built as a scratch build on all architectures - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK, since works in mock and Koji - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly - OK - The shared library file rule doesn't affect a VDR plugin - Not relocatable - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory - OK, the vdr package owns the plugindir and the udev package owns the rule dir - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing - OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line - OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros - OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK - Doesn't contain large documentation files - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application - OK - Doesn't install any header files - Has no static libs, .pc files, .so files, -devel package, .la archives, subpackages, file dependencies or scriptlets - Not a GUI app as such - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages - OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - OK - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available - OK, none seem to be available upstream - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock - OK, it does - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures - OK, it does, I did a scratch build - SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described - It'd be a bit too cumbersome for me to test this package with my current VDR setup. I've used a previous version before and it worked, I believe this will work too. I'd like to note that I'm no expert on udev rules, but I've used similar rules myself as in Source2 and I believe they should work. Ville, you mentioned you'll add a comment about the i18ndetect patch. Please also add comments about the Debian patches and their upstream status if upstream or the Debian maintainer replies you. I won't consider this to be a blocker, though. Considering that this is my first review, to the best of my knowledge this package is suitable for Fedora and I will approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:32:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281932.m9SJWIJI026335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 --- Comment #9 from Jeff Ortel 2008-10-28 15:32:17 EDT --- Great! Thanks Fabian! Being the project maintainer, I was thinking of the changelog to be application centric and now understand its focus on packaging changes as well. I updated the changelog as suggested. SRPM URL: https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/u/suds/python-suds-0.3.1-4.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:37:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281937.m9SJbCM5027408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #16 from Steve Milner 2008-10-28 15:37:11 EDT --- Thanks Orcan! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:27:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281927.m9SJRdYg025366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 15:27:37 EDT --- Mock build.log on my machine: http://pastie.caboo.se/302506 I don't see any gcc -s or strip commands being run. However, I think mock/rpmbuild might be using *my* CFLAGS which differ from %{optflags}, so I'm exporting CFLAGS="%{optflags}" in %build now and seeing if that yields a non-empty debuginfo package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:28:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281928.m9SJSDhn025460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 15:28:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Mock build.log on my machine: http://pastie.caboo.se/302506 > > I don't see any gcc -s or strip commands being run. However, I think > mock/rpmbuild might be using *my* CFLAGS which differ from %{optflags}, so I'm > exporting CFLAGS="%{optflags}" in %build now and seeing if that yields a > non-empty debuginfo package. Nope, still empty. I guess that means I should disable it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 19:58:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810281958.m9SJw3Ux024230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 15:58:02 EDT --- No problem Steve, we can still maintain it together if you want. Here are the new files: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-1.5.6-1.fc9.src.rpm There are three types of rpmlint errors/warnings, which can all be ignored: * deco.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger I used the %trigger functions as Ville suggested. This results in these "dangerous commands". * deco.x86_64: E: zero-length All zero length files are needed by the program * deco.x86_64: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext These kinds of files are needed by the program too. The deco program itself doesn't mean much without the deco-archive. Hence in this package I included both of them. Please let me know if you have any suggestions for improvement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:12:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282012.m9SKCVKN027285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #19 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-28 16:12:29 EDT --- > Actually, rssh should *absolutely* *not* be added to /etc/shells. This file > lists shells which should be considered valid login shells. rssh is not, nor > is it intended to be, a valid login shell... it's a specialized shell intended > to provide extremely restricted access. Thanks Derek for that feedback! > Some additional examples of badness that can occur if rssh is listed in > /etc/shells: > > A malicious user could walk up to someone's terminal while they are away (or > even not looking), quickly run chsh (setting it to rssh), and log the user out, > effectively denying them login access to the machine. > > GDM will populate the user browser with an entry for that user, despite the > fact that they will be unable to log in. > > Sendmail may allow users to execute arbitrary programs via .forward if their > shell is rssh and it is listed in /etc/shells. > > getusershell() will return incorrect information about which shells are valid > login shells. Well, /etc/shells also has /sbin/nologin. Won't that cause some of the above problems too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:13:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282013.m9SKD8LE001765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-28 16:13:05 EDT --- >> The file: >> examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m >> Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: >> >> This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. >> Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This >> copyright notice must accompany all copies. > >Good spot. Will rm in prep. No, you need a modified tarball, so it doesn't wind up in the SRPM. See:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code Yeah, probably disable. And your -static/-devel explanation is IMHO sound. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:27:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282027.m9SKRoBp004796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #20 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 16:27:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Well, /etc/shells also has /sbin/nologin. Won't that cause some of the above > problems too? Indeed it would... All of the above would apply to nologin as well, though in some cases (e.g. the ftp server case and the sendmail .forward case) the exact configuration of the system can come into play. I'm not really at liberty to test any of this at the moment, but I think the chsh DoS example should be easy to reproduce... If you can change your shell to nologin, you can lock yourself out of the system (and so can an opportunistic malicious user), requiring root intervention. Bear in mind that the list of examples I provided is by no means exhaustive... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:37:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:37:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282037.m9SKbXip006516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:38:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282038.m9SKcr0F006671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #21 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 16:38:52 EDT --- Actually I just tried the chsh thing on an old red hat 9 system I had laying around... Smartly, chsh asks for the user's password before changing the shell. However it does otherwise work... so if someone changed the PAM settings for chsh it could still be an issue. The other things I mentioned also would be an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:39:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282039.m9SKdnua006792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-28 16:39:48 EDT --- Thanks! (In reply to comment #6) > Ville, you mentioned you'll add a comment about the i18ndetect patch. Please > also add comments about the Debian patches and their upstream status if > upstream or the Debian maintainer replies you. Will do (no replies yet). By the way, if you'd like to co-maintain this, feel free to ask for perms in pkgdb once the package is in. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vdr-remote Short Description: Extended remote control plugin for VDR Owners: scop Branches: F-9 F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:43:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282043.m9SKh27Z000546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #22 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-28 16:43:01 EDT --- So does this make the presence of /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells a problem? Rahul, can you please revert the change to add rssh to /etc/shells? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:43:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282043.m9SKhI1s007842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #18 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 16:43:17 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:46:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282046.m9SKkCc0008763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 G?ran Uddeborg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #19 from G?ran Uddeborg 2008-10-28 16:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ttf2pt1 Short Description: TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter Owners: goeran Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:48:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282048.m9SKmu6Y001603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #23 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 16:48:55 EDT --- Also note that it's less bad for nologin, since nologin doesn't allow anyone to copy files (i.e. via SSH) to, say, the user's .forward file. Whereas rssh is expressly designed to allow this. :) One might make a case that nologin should be in /etc/shells so that system users can have working .forward files... I would counter that a better way to handle that would be via some other mechanism (e.g. /etc/aliases can send mail to a program for a specified user). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:50:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282050.m9SKo3gw009632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 --- Comment #24 from Derek Martin 2008-10-28 16:50:02 EDT --- Yeah, I think it's still not the right thing... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:47:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282047.m9SKlfu6009157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 G?ran Uddeborg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:33:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282033.m9SKXHKH031254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #17 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-28 16:33:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > >> The file: > >> examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m > >> Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: > >> > >> This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. > >> Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This > >> copyright notice must accompany all copies. > > > >Good spot. Will rm in prep. > > No, you need a modified tarball, so it doesn't wind up in the SRPM. > See:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code That links says "Some upstream packages include patents or trademarks that we are not allowed to ship even as source code." It does not say we need to remove improperly licensed files from the source tarball. > Yeah, probably disable. And your -static/-devel explanation is IMHO sound. Alright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282030.m9SKUxn1031056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs- --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-28 16:30:57 EDT --- Yes, that's what I was looking for. Now we have a permanent explanation of why a package with nothing but a few directories and shell scripts would seem to provide the win32 kernel. Now, down to the review. rpmlint says: mingw32-filesystem.src:38: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(gdi32.dll) mingw32-filesystem.src:39: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-filesystem.src:40: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(ole32.dll) mingw32-filesystem.src:41: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(mscoree.dll) mingw32-filesystem.src:42: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-filesystem.src:43: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mingw32(user32.dll) These should all be adequately covered by the added comment. mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-provides.sh 0775 mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-requires.sh 0775 No idea why these are group writable in the srpm, but it doesn't really matter. mingw32-filesystem.noarch: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Indeed, there are no binaries, just directories; that's quite OK for a filesystem package. mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 Obviously that's intended and accepted by the guidelines; it would be nice to get rpmlint to accept this. Could you file a ticket? Otherwise, I have one remaining question about the two files placed in /etc/profile.d: what would be set here? Is the point to eventually add things to $PATH or set some specific environment variables? Because it seems a bit odd to add two files there which contain nothing but comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:55:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282055.m9SKt3eb002938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-28 16:55:02 EDT --- Not much to say. * source files match upstream: 830d02266bc03a338b6ea551da7acf2f63c2cff7680157db7fed10c72e25bf5b MooseX-StrictConstructor-0.07.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor) = 0.07 perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor::Role::Meta::Method::Constructor) perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor::Role::Object) perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor = 0.07-1.fc10 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(Class::MOP) perl(Moose) >= 0.56 perl(Moose::Exporter) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole) perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor::Role::Meta::Method::Constructor) perl(MooseX::StrictConstructor::Role::Object) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=15, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.23 CPU) Result: PASS * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 20:53:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282053.m9SKrJS5010156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 --- Comment #7 from ZC Miao 2008-10-28 16:53:17 EDT --- Sorry, still had problem, new fixes: SPEC: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg.spec SRPM: http://linuxfire.com.cn/~hellwolf/software/g2ipmsg/g2ipmsg-0.9.6-2.fc9.src.rpm ChangeLog: * Tue Oct 28 2008 ZC Miao - 0.9.6-2 - Fix Release TAG - add Source url reference -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 21:55:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282155.m9SLt7Ii021623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-28 17:55:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321729) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321729) Fix for items 1-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 21:54:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282154.m9SLsEBe021252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jmoskovc at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ville.skytta at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-28 17:54:13 EDT --- 1) COPYING is not included. 2) automake does not appear to be required, autoconf is enough. 3) Shipping some docs as PDF would be more useful than troff sources. 4) I don't quite understand the idea behind the "stupidrcs" patch, it appears to be using hardwired values for things I suppose ./configure should be detecting. Could you explain it? Will attach fix for items 1-3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 22:01:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282201.m9SM1hh9022810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-28 18:01:42 EDT --- Looks like you got an answer from the Debian maintainer of flexdock along with some patches to fix the problem. Please go ahead and incorporate them into your package and post a new spec+source rpm set for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 22:55:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282255.m9SMtMJ3023039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 18:55:21 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint wput* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i wput* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: 67125acab1d520e5d2a0429cd9cf7fc379987f30d5bbed0b0e97b92b554fcc13 wput-0.6.1.tgz SHA1SUM of Source RPM: 67125acab1d520e5d2a0429cd9cf7fc379987f30d5bbed0b0e97b92b554fcc13 wput-0.6.1.tgz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910045 Tested F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910050 [?] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 22:57:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282257.m9SMvp6i032034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Oct 28 23:24:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468128] Review Request: python-flickrapi - Python module for interfacing with the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810282324.m9SNOTcY003639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468128 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-28 19:24:28 EDT --- This looks rather clean; I guess I could point out that the first line of the spec is kind of meaningless and should be removed. I note that there is a test suite, but it talks to flickr's servers so it can't be run automatically. However, I did run it and found that two of the tests fail. One fails because a file tests/photo.jpg is missing (maybe I'm supposed to provide it myself), and a second fails like so: File "/home/tibbs/work/rpm/python-flickrapi-1.1/flickrapi-1.1/flickrapi/multipart.py", line 16, in flickrapi.multipart.Part Failed example: Part({'name': 'photo', 'filename': image}, image.read(), 'image/jpeg') # doctest: +ELLIPSIS Exception raised: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/doctest.py", line 1212, in __run compileflags, 1) in test.globs File "", line 1, in Part({'name': 'photo', 'filename': image}, image.read(), 'image/jpeg') NameError: name 'image' is not defined Perhaps you can make some sense of that. It would be nice to have an explanation before importing a package with known test failures. * source files match upstream: 0f6e10738d87ff81a47c4841dab735c56e1d00ed1ce755ab0b603abc2e640974 flickrapi-1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-flickrapi = 1.1-4.fc10 = python(abi) = 2.5 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 00:11:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290011.m9T0B5Zf001683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #20 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-28 20:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > With fixing missing BuildRequires (automake, libtool), this > package is okay. > Done. new spec: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4.spec updated srpm: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/gpp4-1.0.4-11.f8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 00:13:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290013.m9T0DMu2010688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #21 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-28 20:13:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpp4 Short Description: LGPL CCP4 library Owners: timfenn Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: timfenn -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 00:13:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290013.m9T0Da5v010735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Tim Fenn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 00:17:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290017.m9T0HL7f002493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-28 20:17:20 EDT --- Thanks Ralf for the comments (In reply to comment #1) > Just a couple of remarks: > > (In reply to comment #0) > MUSTFIX > - libgarmin.a is missing from *-devel > Without, this *-devel rpm is widely useless. fixed > - package doesn't support shared libraries > => Must add *-static magic to *-devel fixed. I added '--enable-static=no' to %configure > - Wrong License: > Your spec says: License: GPLv2+ > Several files (e.g. libgarmin.h and COPYING) inside of the sources say: > GPLv2 *only*. fixed SPEC: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin.spec SRPM: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/libgarmin-0-0.2.20081026svn.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:09:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290109.m9T19YAQ018557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-28 21:09:33 EDT --- fixed. http://ispbrasil.com.br/ifstat/ifstat.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/ifstat/ifstat-1.1-8.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290119.m9T1JpQg020082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 01:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290135.m9T1ZhJn013848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-28 21:35:40 EDT --- tasque-0.1.7-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tasque-0.1.7-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 02:53:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:53:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290253.m9T2roJi004175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 22:53:49 EDT --- Package is in good condition. My notes: * Source0 must be given in full URL. * I would include the test.py and demo.py inside the %doc files, because they give a nice demonstration about how gnuplot-py should be used. You don't need to remove shebangs from them. Just do: mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/demo.py doc/Gnuplot/ mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/test.py doc/Gnuplot/ in the %install section. Or maybe you may want to install them inside an "examples" directory under %doc. Otherwise the package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 02:58:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225887] Merge Review: hicolor-icon-theme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290258.m9T2wRVC005002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225887 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:02:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290302.m9T32tM0029231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|orcanbahri at yahoo.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #19 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 23:02:54 EDT --- Oops, sorry, comment #18 belongs to some other bug. Please ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:05:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463217] Review Request: gnuplot-py - Python interface to Gnuplot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290305.m9T35F1p006393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463217 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 23:05:14 EDT --- Package is in good condition. My notes: * Source0 must be given in full URL. * I would include the test.py and demo.py inside the %doc files, because they give a nice demonstration about how gnuplot-py should be used. You don't need to remove shebangs from them. Just do: mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/demo.py doc/Gnuplot/ mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/Gnuplot/test.py doc/Gnuplot/ in the %install section. Or maybe you may want to install them inside an "examples" directory under %doc. Otherwise the package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:07:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290307.m9T37bgR030155@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 23:07:36 EDT --- Package submitted as an update. Closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:07:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290307.m9T37ctm030179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598 Bug 458598 depends on bug 458345, which changed state. Bug 458345 Summary: Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:10:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461776] Review Request: kde-plasma-quickaccess - Plasma applet for quick access to the most used folders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290310.m9T3Ax2i007231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461776 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 23:10:57 EDT --- package in rawhide. closing the bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 03:13:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290313.m9T3DEwE007598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-28 23:13:12 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 04:19:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290419.m9T4JK80008433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Alias| |libmusicbrainz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-29 00:19:19 EDT --- I did a full review on this package. Everything seems fine except * docs/mb_howto.txt should be included among %doc, or maybe in devel's %doc * the examples directory should be included in devel's %doc Other than these two things the package yields Fedora Guidelines. A question: Isn't it time to rename this package as libmusicbrainz2 and call libmusicbrainz3 as libmusicbrainz? Is there a particular reason why this is not done yet? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 04:47:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290447.m9T4lZGY012968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #6 from Jameson 2008-10-29 00:47:35 EDT --- Ok... I've got updated files in the same places. I believe I have corrected all the issues above. I'll e-mail upstream, and see if I can get them to include the license in the tarball, and use the corrected ChangeLog if possible. Thanks for the help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:13:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290513.m9T5DXmZ025774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-29 01:13:30 EDT --- This builds fine; rpmlint says: python-pywbem.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 7) Not a big deal; fix it if you like. python-pywbem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pywbem/mof_compiler.py 0644 python-pywbem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pywbem/wbemcli.py 0644 These look like scripts (start with #!/whatever) but are not executable. This happens often with python code; for some reason python developers tend to make files look like scripts even though nothing is ever supposed to run them. If they are intended to be executed, though, they should be executable. Otherwise I wouldn't worry about it, although you can remove the #! lines if you like. python-pywbem.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.6-1 ['0.7-1.fc10', '0.7-1'] Your last changelog entry is for version 0.6-1 but the package has version 0.7-1. Each version/release bump should have a changelog entry. So just one really problematic rpmlint complaint. Obviously I can't check against the upstream tarball since it doesn't exist yet. We don't generally provide license files when upstream doesn't include them. All we do is bug upstream to include them when they're absent. Since upstream seems to be you, I guess you can consider yourself bugged. Maybe it can get into that final 0.7 tarball. Also, things are a bit confusing, because README says LGPLv2 but the actual source files say LGPLv2+. Can you clarify that? There should be no need for the manual python dependency; rpm will generate an appropriate one for you. ? Can't check source against upstream since it hasn't been released yet. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? Actual license is not completely clear. * license is open source-compatible. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X rpmlint has valid complaints. X manual python dependency is unnecessary: python-pywbem = 0.7-1.fc10 = X python >= 2.3 python(abi) = 2.5 * %check is not present; not test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:18:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290518.m9T5I7eV017458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-29 01:18:06 EDT --- No problem, but you should provide the new links, since for every update you need to bump the release version and that would make at least the old SRPM link obsolete. Also, for every update you need to explain what you did in the %changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:29:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290529.m9T5Thqd019006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 --- Comment #8 from Jameson 2008-10-29 01:29:42 EDT --- I didn't realize that it was important to bump the release version while still under review. the new SRPM can be found here: http://www.vtscrew.com/libprojectM-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:43:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290543.m9T5hEvv021120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290543.m9T5hDPw021094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-29 01:43:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor Short Description: Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes Owners: cweyl Branches: F-8, F-9, devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:49:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468846] Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290549.m9T5nQNM022063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468846 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 01:49:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910218 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 24d9d46c8fc23197666a43a7962a7b0d aspell6-az-0.02-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:56:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468848] Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290556.m9T5uMlC032123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468848 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 01:56:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910220 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 47c8599e529fc291a096c12f0b8372ca aspell6-fa-0.11-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 05:57:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290557.m9T5vROC023448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 01:57:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910222 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 0d4b408076115b7516c68887a563be68 aspell6-csb-0.02-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:00:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290600.m9T60gDk032758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:10:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467183] Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290610.m9T6AXfe025509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467183 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 02:10:32 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910224 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 6df98356e411891c956c249731b708fa aspell-mt-0.50-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:18:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290618.m9T6IGGk002812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #5 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-29 02:18:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Unfortunately, this one isn't going to fly as is. In the code, it includes an > mp3 encoder and decoder (code copied from lame), which is patent encumbered and > non-permissable in Fedora. The code does not actually include mp3 encoder/decoder. It just uses lame (using system()) if present for encoding/decoding mp3. See compress.cpp encodeAudio(). Is there any problem with that ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:36:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290636.m9T6aruZ029297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 02:36:52 EDT --- can we close this if package is built for all requested branches? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:37:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290637.m9T6bT4P005641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 02:37:27 EDT --- can you request cvs here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:41:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290641.m9T6fo1s029935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 02:41:49 EDT --- SPEC is missing ">" in iconv command koji build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:47:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290647.m9T6llLV030696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 --- Comment #8 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-29 02:47:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openvas-libraries Short Description: Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server Owners: huzaifas Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 06:48:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 02:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290648.m9T6mFdL007045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 07:08:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290708.m9T78fKu001134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 --- Comment #17 from Parag AN(????) 2008-10-29 03:08:40 EDT --- Can you request for CVS and build this package and Close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 07:11:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461757] Review Request: libdwarf - library for producing and consuming DWARF debugging information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290711.m9T7BLBc001716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461757 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cagney at redhat.com | |) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 07:31:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290731.m9T7VDDS004845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-29 03:31:11 EDT --- Okay, then please follow join wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 07:51:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290751.m9T7p5pT007838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #40 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-29 03:51:02 EDT --- Okay. * When you think the submitted F-9 package can be moved from testing to stable repository please revisit bodhi interface and modify (edit) your push request. * dist-f10 repo got frozen before you rebuilt this package on F-10 branch so this package won't be pushed into F-10 branch automatically. - Later bodhi ( http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ ) will begin to accept F-10 packages update requests (such announce will be sent to fedora-devel-list mailing list). After that please submit push request also for F-10 branch on bodhi - And later mass branching will be executed F-10 directory will be newly created on tasque module in Fedora CVS. After that please rebuild your package (tasque) for "devel" branch (at this point devel now points to F-11, not F-10. Currently "devel" branch points to F-10). Closing as NEXTRELEASE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 09:01:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290901.m9T91rNc020717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-10-29 05:01:50 EDT --- @Jason: thanks sorry for the delay been a bit busy here. (In reply to comment #16) > Go ahead and apply for your Fedora account, do the CLA bits and apply for > packager access. account, CLA done. packager group access requested. Hope I've made it before you go on holiday. > I will sponsor you and then you can make your CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 09:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290949.m9T9ni8N029872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-29 05:49:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-csb Short Description: Kashubian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 09:51:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468846] Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290951.m9T9p2cg006602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468846 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-29 05:51:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-az Short Description: Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 09:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467183] Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290953.m9T9rYRx030935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467183 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-29 05:53:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-mt Short Description: Maltest hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 09:52:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468848] Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810290952.m9T9qiQC006970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468848 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-29 05:52:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-fa Short Description: Farsi hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 10:00:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467182] Review Request: hunspell-sc - Sardinian hunspell dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291000.m9TA0E5Y000334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467182 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2008-10-29 06:00:13 EDT --- That was a bit silly: New SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sc.spec New SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-sc-0.20040601-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 10:50:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291050.m9TAoepQ010253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-29 06:50:39 EDT --- Can you explain why you need to make some of the files executable? When that's sorted out, I can make a release we can use instead of git. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:00:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291100.m9TB0hHg020522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-29 07:00:42 EDT --- I would run "python setup.py..." instead of doing a chmod. Also what is the reason of the chmod on all the activity files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:02:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291102.m9TB2h5N012487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-29 07:02:40 EDT --- All problems written in previous comments are fixed (especially from comment #10 which contains detail review steps). Reviewed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:09:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467642] Review Request: sugar-read - PDF reader for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291109.m9TB99OB013575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467642 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-29 07:09:09 EDT --- Yeah, I guess the activity is not actually working. We need to port sugar-evince to latest poppler (I already did some work on it) and also merge it upstream hopefully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:07:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291107.m9TB7YsE021812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-29 07:07:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-provides.sh 0775 > mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-find-requires.sh 0775 > No idea why these are group writable in the srpm, but it doesn't really matter. They are installed with the correct permissions anyway. > mingw32-filesystem.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 > Obviously that's intended and accepted by the guidelines; it would be nice to > get rpmlint to accept this. Could you file a ticket? Bug 468981. > Otherwise, I have one remaining question about the two files placed in > /etc/profile.d: what would be set here? Is the point to eventually add things > to $PATH or set some specific environment variables? Because it seems a bit > odd to add two files there which contain nothing but comments. Yes, those were intended to store environment variables, but since we never got around to using them for anything, I have removed them from the latest version. SRPM: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem-33-1.fc10.src.rpm Spec: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw32-filesystem.spec * Wed Oct 29 2008 Richard Jones - 33-1 - Remove mingw32.{sh,csh} which are unused. * Mon Oct 27 2008 Richard Jones - 32-1 - Add mingw32-configure script. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:34:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291134.m9TBYrFD026847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-29 07:34:52 EDT --- Looks good but I would like to get permission and shebang fixed upstream. I'll send mail to Walter and cc you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:51:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291151.m9TBpsEg030628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 --- Comment #2 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-29 07:51:53 EDT --- Thank you for reviewing. I have submitted the patches up stream. if you approve, can you switch the flags? Or would you prefer to wait for the new release? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 11:58:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 07:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468539] Review Request: sugar-jukebox - Media player activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291158.m9TBwJim031860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468539 Simon Schampijer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at schampijer.de --- Comment #1 from Simon Schampijer 2008-10-29 07:58:18 EDT --- I pinged the maintainer for cleaning the permission issues you worked around in the SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 12:20:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291220.m9TCKsgW004742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-29 08:20:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #16) > > >> The file: > > >> examples-ml/Combinatorica5.m > > >> Cannot be included in Fedora cue to the following licensing clause: > > >> > > >> This package may be copied in its entirety for nonprofit purposes only. > > >> Sale, other than for the direct cost of the media, is prohibited. This > > >> copyright notice must accompany all copies. > > > > > >Good spot. Will rm in prep. > > > > No, you need a modified tarball, so it doesn't wind up in the SRPM. > > See:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#When_Upstream_uses_Prohibited_Code > > That links says "Some upstream packages include patents or trademarks that we > are not allowed to ship even as source code." It does not say we need to remove > improperly licensed files from the source tarball. Read the next sentence in that paragraph: "In these cases you have to modify the source tarball to remove this code before you even upload it to the build system." > > Yeah, probably disable. And your -static/-devel explanation is IMHO sound. > > Alright. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 12:33:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291233.m9TCXn7E030914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-29 08:33:48 EDT --- openssl module should call SSL_library_init patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/openssl_module/source/library/globus_openssl.c?r1=1.13&r2=1.14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 12:38:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291238.m9TCcg2v031793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2008-10-29 08:38:41 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi library not thread safe bug: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6510 Patch accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi/source/library/globus_i_gsi_gss_utils.c?r1=1.51&r2=1.52 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 12:46:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291246.m9TCkshQ000865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-29 08:46:53 EDT --- Thanks Marco, for your input. The reason to add exec permission to those files was that rpmlint complain about most *.py files in ...Implode.activity/ [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-implode-5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-implode.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sugar/activities/Implode.activity/gridwidget.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 12:52:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291252.m9TCqX1K011217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-29 08:52:32 EDT --- rpmlint complain about the permission [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint -i sugar-analyze-7-1.fc10.noarch.rpm sugar-analyze.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sugar/activities/Analyze.activity/procmem/analysis.py 0644 This text file contains a shebang or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks the executable bits and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the executable bits, otherwise remove the shebang or move the file elsewhere. ... ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 13:19:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] New: Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer Provider Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer Provider https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Summary: Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer Provider Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-gather/sblim-gather.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-gather/sblim-gather-2.1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation for Manageability Performance Data Gatherer Base. This package contains the agents and control programs for gathering and providing performance data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 13:23:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469002] Review Request: sblim-gather - SBLIM Gatherer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291323.m9TDNKxC008633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469002 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |sblim-gather - SBLIM |sblim-gather - SBLIM |Gatherer Provider |Gatherer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 13:25:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291325.m9TDPICP017958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-29 09:25:16 EDT --- Just two small thing before I will do a full review. There is a typo in the 'Source0' - Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz ^ ?_ the 's' is missing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL BuildRoot - Your current BuildRoot is a bit unusual. Please check the examples of the recommanded BuildRoots https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag %changelog - Every time you make changes in your spec file, you should bump the release and create a new entry in your changelog. I think this this time you can summarize all changes and bump the release to '2' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs %files - If you like to can replace 'shed' with the macro %{name}. But that is only cosmetically and depends on the packager's flavor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 13:45:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291345.m9TDjlvE023900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-29 09:45:46 EDT --- There is a new release, so you might want to take it. But yeah r+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 13:51:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291351.m9TDp0KD016249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-29 09:50:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The chmod 0755 is something I added because without it rpmlint claimed the the > resulting binary was not being stripped and after reading up on the issue a bit > I found documentation stating that rpmbuild will automatically strip > executables and that explicit calls to strip in a .spec was frowned upon. For me, it works without this line 'chmod 0755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/shed' -> rpmlint is silent One other thing, the file BUGS is missing in your spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 14:34:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291434.m9TEYkFj004317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #47 from Rex Dieter 2008-10-29 10:34:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ktorrent New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rdieter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 14:42:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291442.m9TEg8Kp006300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 --- Comment #3 from Jiri Moskovcak 2008-10-29 10:42:06 EDT --- Thanks for the patch. I really don't know now why we need the "stupidrcs" patch I would have to look into the autoconf/configure magic - but it seems it doesn't compile without it... Updated srpm and spec file: SRPM: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/rcs-5.7-34.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/rcs.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 14:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291453.m9TErsDn031868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Bryan Kearney changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Bryan Kearney 2008-10-29 10:53:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-turtleart Short Description:Turtleart activity for the sugar desktop Owners: bkearney Branches: F-10 InitialCC: None -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 14:53:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469023] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: The Class::Adapter class is intended as an abstract base class for creating any sort of class or object that follows the Adapter pattern. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Adapter/perl-Class-Adapter-1.05-1.fc10.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Adapter/perl-Class-Adapter.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:09:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291509.m9TF9NjN003049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Debarshi Ray changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|debarshi.ray at gmail.com | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-29 11:09:21 EDT --- +---------------------------------+ | This package is APPROVED by me. | +---------------------------------+ However: + Building the package on Fedora 9 x86_64 spews a large number of compiler warnings. Those may look harmless but can cause quite a pain at times. What does upstream have to say? + Please remember to block ExcludeArch blocker bugs of all the architectures that are not supported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:12:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291512.m9TFCnJc004046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291512.m9TFCcCu012847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:20:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291520.m9TFKbe6006202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-29 11:20:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bunny Short Description: Instrumented C code security fuzzer Owners: rakesh Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: rakesh Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:18:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291518.m9TFIxb1013942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-29 11:18:58 EDT --- no reply till now. But upstream is active. Waiting for response. These warnings are very easy to fix. Yeah - I will block ExcludeArch blocker Bugs before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:28:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469027] New: Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Summary: Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource at till.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/bindfs.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/bindfs-1.8-2.tillf8.src.rpm Description: Bindfs allows you to mirror a directory and also change the the permissions in the mirror directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:34:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457340] Review Request: rome - Java tools for parsing, generating and publishing RSS and Atom feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291534.m9TFYQbC008908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457340 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2008-10-29 11:34:24 EDT --- Sorry, should have closed this already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:34:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291534.m9TFYj6e017250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #10 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-29 11:34:44 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:39:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291539.m9TFdXuW018343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-29 11:39:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Read the next sentence in that paragraph: > > "In these cases you have to modify the source tarball to remove this code > before you even upload it to the build system." Yes, my point being the quoted sentence only applies if the first statement is true, which it is not. There is nothing patented or trademarked about that one file, it is simply improperly licensed. We can delete it and be on our merry way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:37:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291537.m9TFb3Q9018183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:46:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291546.m9TFkL5k019852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #10 from Gratien D'haese 2008-10-29 11:46:20 EDT --- Updated the rear.spec file and rear source rpm: Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.src.rpm Our development version 1.7.8 has been uploaded to SF: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=171835&package_id=287824 Some additional remarks on the rpmlint output - see further: $ rpmlint -i RPMS/noarch/rear-1.7.8-1.fc9.noarch.rpm rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/contrib ./usr/share/rear/contrib The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/bin/sh bash The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/rear/skel/default/.bash_history The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete it from the package if not. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/README ./usr/share/rear/README The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/rear-1.7.8/CHANGES ./usr/share/rear/CHANGES The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/rear/skel/default/init bin/init The relative symbolic link points nowhere. rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/log/lastlog rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/var/lib/nfs/state rear.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/rear/skel/default/etc/mtab 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. Comment 1: The zero-length errors are normal as we need those empty files during the creation of the ROOT file system image of the rescue system. These files are needed once we boot from ReaR.iso to have a sane rescue system. Comment 2: the relative symbolic link points nowhere errors are normal as these will become meaningful when the package gets installed. Comment 3: the .bash_history file lives under the /usr/share/rear/skel structure, which gets tar'ed to the final ROOT file system of the rescue environment. So, it is meant to be a hidden file. I hope this is OK for you? best regards, Gratien D'haese -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:48:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291548.m9TFm2mS020151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-29 11:48:01 EDT --- And if it's not removed from the tarball, it's distributed in the SRPM, which is a no-no. Blocking FE-LEGAL for confirmation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:55:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291555.m9TFtjVV013947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #22 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-29 11:55:44 EDT --- Ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:51:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:51:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291551.m9TFpDH4013239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-29 11:51:11 EDT --- Great. This new package has added mingw32-filesystem.src: W: strange-permission mingw32-configure.sh 0755 which again doesn't matter. I've no idea what rpmlint has against executable files in srpms. I don't really see a point in running through my checklist for a package that doesn't really contain anything, so I won't bother. APPROVED Please note that I will probably review some of the library packages, but do not feel remotely qualified to review the binutils package that everything seems to depend on. Sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:58:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469023] Review Request: perl-Class-Adapter - Perl implementation of the "Adapter" Design Pattern In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291558.m9TFwQN6014328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469023 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Class-Adapter |perl-Class-Adapter - Perl | |implementation of the | |"Adapter" Design Pattern --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-29 11:58:25 EDT --- Please try to use the template when posting review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 15:57:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291557.m9TFvBbN014147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-29 11:57:10 EDT --- I have to say, I'm not seeing in the tarball the actual code copied from lame that spot refers to above. I see references to mp3 in the code, of course, but everything seems to come down to either option parsing or calls to compress.cpp::encodeAudio which builds command lines and calls out to external programs (lame, oggenc, flac). What am I missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:13:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291613.m9TGDxDa017368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-29 12:13:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-filesystem Short Description: MinGW base filesystem and environment Owners: rjones berrange Branches: F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: rjones berrange -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:16:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291616.m9TGGs0v026370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-29 12:16:52 EDT --- To make this package a bit more approachable, I've expanded the list of files, requires and provides below. /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-addr2line /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-ar /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-as /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-c++filt /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-dlltool /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-dllwrap /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gprof /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-ld /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-nm /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-objcopy /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-objdump /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-readelf /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-size /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-strings /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-strip /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-windmc /usr/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-windres /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ar /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/dlltool /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/nm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/objcopy /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/objdump /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ranlib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/strip /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.x /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xa /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xbn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xn /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xr /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/lib/ldscripts/i386pe.xu /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-addr2line.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-ar.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-as.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-c++filt.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-dlltool.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-gprof.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-ld.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-nlmconv.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-nm.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-objcopy.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-objdump.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-readelf.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-size.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-strings.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-strip.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-windmc.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1/i686-pc-mingw32-windres.1.gz Requires: libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.8)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) mingw32-filesystem >= 26 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: mingw-binutils = 2.18.50_20080109_2 mingw32-binutils = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:43:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291643.m9TGhDJ7024368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roma at lcg.ufrj.br --- Comment #1 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-29 12:43:12 EDT --- Hi, this is not an official review (practice review): rpmlint outputs the following: [lua:~/rhrpms] rpmlint tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm tcl-mysqltcl.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [lua:~/rhrpms] rpmlint tcl-mysqltcl-debuginfo-3.05-1.fc8.x86_64.rpm tcl-mysqltcl-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mysqltcl-3.05/generic/mysqltcl.c tcl-mysqltcl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/src/debug/mysqltcl-3.05/generic/mysqltcl.c tcl-mysqltcl-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Therefore you need to: 1) add a version in the changelog section %changelog * Thu Oct 7 2008 Rene Ploetz 3.05-1 - Initial mysqltcl 2) remove the execution bit of mysqltcl.c in the %%prep section: chmod -x generic/mysqltcl.c 3) You should not use Requires: tcl tcl(abi) = 8.5 mysql F8 has tcl(abi) = 8.4, for instance, and mysql in not necessary, because one of its shared libraries is a dependency anyway. 4) The license seems to be BSD and not MIT, but I did not check it yet. [lua:~/temp/temp/mysqltcl-3.05] more COPYING Some other old historical license notes can be fond in READMY-msqltcl , mysqltcl.c and mysqltcl.n It seems that it is BSD-like licence 5) You should obsolete mysqltcl, in case someone is using an old package named this way. 6) Add mysqltcl.html to the documentation. 7) Claim ownership of directory %{mysqltcl}-%{version} 8) My comments were based on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines This link should help you in the future. I would suggest a spec like the one below. It builds cleanly in mock for F8 and F9 i386 or x86_64: mock -r fedora-8-i386 rebuild tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-2.fc8.src.rpm --define "tcl_version 8.4" --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # We used to define this dynamically, but the Fedora buildsystem chokes on # using this for the versioned Requires on tcl(abi), so we hardcode it. # This sucks, but there is no other clean way around it, because tcl # (and tclsh) aren't in the default buildroot. %{!?tcl_version: %define tcl_version 8.5} %{!?tcl_sitearch: %define tcl_sitearch tcl%{tcl_version}} %define real_name mysqltcl Summary: MySQL interface for Tcl Name: tcl-mysqltcl Version: 3.05 Release: 2%{?dist} License: BSD Group: Development/Languages Source: http://www.xdobry.de/mysqltcl/%{real_name}-%{version}.tar.gz URL: http://www.xdobry.de/mysqltcl BuildRequires: mysql-devel BuildRequires: tcl-devel >= 8.3.1 Requires: tcl(abi) = %{tcl_version} Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Provides: %{real_name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{real_name} < %{version}-%{release} %description Mysqltcl is an extension to the Tool Command Language (Tcl) that provides high-level access to a MySQL database server. %prep %setup -q -n %{real_name}-%{version} chmod -x generic/mysqltcl.c %build %configure --with-tcl=%{_libdir} \ --with-mysql-lib=%{_libdir}/mysql \ --enable-threads make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} pushd %{buildroot}%{_libdir} mkdir %{tcl_sitearch} mv %{real_name}-%{version} %{tcl_sitearch} popd %clean rm -rf %{buildroot} %files %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc README README-msqltcl ChangeLog COPYING AUTHORS doc/mysqltcl.html %defattr (-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/%{tcl_sitearch}/%{real_name}-%{version} %{_mandir}/mann/* %changelog * Thu Oct 7 2008 Rene Ploetz 3.05-1 - Initial mysqltcl spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:42:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291642.m9TGgaP3032659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-29 12:42:35 EDT --- I spoke too soon. A few other people pointed out that none of the code doing the decode/encode was actually copied, only format headers. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:47:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291647.m9TGlMpG001146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-29 12:47:20 EDT --- The fuse libraries are LGPLv2+, so there should not be any license compatibility concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291651.m9TGpHUv002084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #16 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-29 12:51:16 EDT --- Another practice review: tcl-mysqltcl The person who submitted it does not have a sponsor yet, though. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 16:48:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291648.m9TGmNnL001278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #10 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-29 12:48:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I am concerned that we are setting precedent for vendors to create proprietary > drivers that use the fuse interface to bypass GPL requirements. Yes, well, I'm not a big fan of this move either. I wish Sun would learn to play nice with the Linux kernel, but I'll just have to add this to my long list of "someday" items. There's no legal barrier here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:11:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291711.m9THBO3w007201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-29 13:11:23 EDT --- There is still a little issue with the compilation flags. The %optflags' -O2 and -fexceptions flags get overridden during the build process (with -O and -fno-exceptions). You will most probably need to patch or sed the Makefile to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:18:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291718.m9THI0T2000879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-29 13:17:59 EDT --- not really :-/ please don?t be angry with me. I try my best, but it?s not very easy. I hope I?m not on the wrong track.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:22:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466237] Review Request: perl-File-Comments - Recognizes file formats and extracts format-specific comments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291722.m9THMoTZ010683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466237 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:32:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291732.m9THWHhV004964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #18 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-29 13:32:16 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910891 now I need to ask for a cvs account ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:44:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469052] New: Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469052 Summary: Review Request: ris-linux - RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kanarip at kanarip.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/ris-linux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/ris-linux-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: RIS for Linux - Boot winpe from the net / Ris Windows Installation rpmlint silent koji scratch builds: - dist-f8-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910933 - dist-f9-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910935 - dist-f10-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910937 - dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=910939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:54:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291754.m9THsBqo010444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469057 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291753.m9THrY9I010352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469058 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:55:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291755.m9THt9mb011001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-29 13:55:08 EDT --- Let's try to get this part straight... In OpenSUSE "factory " (equivalent of Fedora rawhide): sblim-sfcb Provides: cim-server Provides: cimserver tog-pegasus Provides: cim-server In the current sblim-sfcb for Fedora being proposed, you have: Provides: cimserver = %{version}-%{release} and unfortunately, Fedora's tog-pegasus has neither of these lines. Can we all agree that: Provides: cim-server is the "right" thing to add? That way package Requires: and/or yum install lines can all agree to use cim-server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:58:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291758.m9THwCGh021793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-29 13:58:11 EDT --- In fact, best to drop the Requires: tcl(abi) entirely, as rpm should pick up the correct one automatically. What are the Provides and Obsoletes for? What in Fedora is this replacing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:06:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291806.m9TI6gkr024021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-29 14:06:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > In fact, best to drop the Requires: tcl(abi) entirely, as rpm should pick up > the correct one automatically. What are the Provides and Obsoletes for? What > in Fedora is this replacing? Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#Extensions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:52:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:52:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291752.m9THqjYc020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |469055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291752.m9THqdM2020183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-29 13:52:38 EDT --- Now you should follow Join wiki from "Add Package to CVS and Set Owner". (as mentioned at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_CVS_and_Set_Owner follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 17:52:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462181] Review Request: teeworlds - Online multi-player platform 2D shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291752.m9THqBvX020090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462181 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2008-10-29 13:52:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > not really :-/ > > please don?t be angry with me. I try my best, but it?s not very easy. > I hope I?m not on the wrong track.. No problem. Just a reminder -- any time you need help feel free to ask. And posting work-in-progress (even unfinished, unrunnable or uncompilable) packages can get you early reviews :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:20:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468275] Review Request: sugar-turtleart - TurtleArt activity for the sugar desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291820.m9TIKTnu016438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468275 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mpg at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 14:20:27 EDT --- Please don't forget to move the review to ASSIGNED and assign it to the reviewer. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:21:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447738] Review Request: libzypp - ZYpp is a Linux software management engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291821.m9TILKVF026651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447738 --- Comment #12 from Lorenzo Villani 2008-10-29 14:21:19 EDT --- I'm pinging upstream to see if there are plans to port the ZYpp stack to rpm 4.6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:18:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:18:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291818.m9TIIB2D025843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #9 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-29 14:18:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > There is still a little issue with the compilation flags. > The %optflags' -O2 and -fexceptions flags get overridden during the build > process (with -O and -fno-exceptions). You will most probably need to patch or > sed the Makefile to fix it. fixed (sed) http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/scummvm-tools-0.12.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:25:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291825.m9TIPqDc017421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #26 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 14:25:50 EDT --- Are you still passing --vendor to your desktop file install? It's unclear to me as you haven't been noting URL's to the latest spec/src.rpm. >From the guideline "For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:31:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291831.m9TIVgAg018637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-29 14:31:40 EDT --- Now that's weird, but it makes sense. Sorry I missed it, carry on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:35:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291835.m9TIZJU5019440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #11 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-29 14:35:18 EDT --- To be clear, I am not talking about the FUSE library itself but the actual kernel module that sits on top of the library. That module itself is under CDDL since this is not a rewrite but a port of the original codebase. GPLv2 and CDDL are incompatible. I don't think sticking a LGPL library in-between otherwise incompatibly licensed code bases would free them of the requirements of one of the licenses. I would like Red Hat Legal to confirm this. Have they? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:34:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291834.m9TIYL1T029183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-29 14:34:20 EDT --- bunny-0.93-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bunny-0.93-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:35:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291835.m9TIZKOT029600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-29 14:35:19 EDT --- bunny-0.93-5.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bunny-0.93-5.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:33:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291833.m9TIXWWl029113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #5 from R P Herrold 2008-10-29 14:33:30 EDT --- comment #2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047#c2 is accurate -- this patch permits building on say, RHEL 5 [herrold at centos-5 tcl-mysqltcl]$ diff -u tcl-mysqltcl.spec-ORIG tcl-mysqltcl.spec --- tcl-mysqltcl.spec-ORIG 2008-10-29 14:31:00.000000000 -0400 +++ tcl-mysqltcl.spec 2008-10-29 14:31:00.000000000 -0400 @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: tcl-devel mysql-devel -Requires: tcl tcl(abi) = 8.5 mysql +# Requires: tcl tcl(abi) = 8.5 +# Requires: mysql Provides: mysqltcl = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:38:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291838.m9TIcRwb030166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #5 from Adam Miller 2008-10-29 14:38:26 EDT --- Added BUGS file, changed the macro name for shed, removed the chmod that wasn't needed, fixed my release increment overlook and updated the changelog as well as fixed the buildroot I uploaded to new SRPM and new spec to: Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/shed-1.13-2.src.rpm Thank you for your input and please feel free to offer suggestions stylistically or compliance related, I appreciate input of all types. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:38:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291838.m9TIcA1W030121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-29 14:38:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > In fact, best to drop the Requires: tcl(abi) entirely, as rpm should pick up > > the correct one automatically. What are the Provides and Obsoletes for? What > > in Fedora is this replacing? > > Please check https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#Extensions Hi, I based my spec file on this (recent) .src.rpm from F9: tcl-tile-0.8.2-5.fc9.src.rpm I thought it was created according to Fedora rules. It seems I was wrong... -------------------------------------------- # We used to define this dynamically, but the Fedora buildsystem chokes on # using this for the versioned Requires on tcl(abi), so we hardcode it. # This sucks, but there is no other clean way around it, because tcl # (and tclsh) aren't in the default buildroot. %{!?tcl_version: %define tcl_version 8.5} %{!?tcl_sitearch: %define tcl_sitearch %{_libdir}/tcl%{tcl_version}} %define realname tile Name: tcl-%{realname} Version: 0.8.2 Release: 5%{?dist} Summary: Modified Tk styling engine Group: System Environment/Libraries License: TCL URL: http://tktable.sourceforge.net/ Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/tktable/%{realname}-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) Provides: %{realname} = %{version}-%{release} Provides: tk-%{realname} = %{version}-%{release} BuildRequires: tcl-devel, tk-devel, libX11-devel Requires: tcl(abi) = %{tcl_version} ---------------------------------------------------------------- The Provides and Obsoletes are meant for a package named mysqltcl, the upstream name. It does not exist in Fedora, but it may have come from a 3th party repo. This is the only way of uninstalling it during an upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:53:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468465] Review Request: posterazor - Make your own poster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291853.m9TIrsR7023097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468465 --- Comment #1 from Nicoleau Fabien 2008-10-29 14:53:54 EDT --- Update (add desktop file) : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/posterazor.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc9/posterazor-1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Rebuild under mock is OK and rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:59:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: Homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291859.m9TIxT96024219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #27 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-29 14:59:27 EDT --- We've played with this a bit together yesterday. The vendor tag is imposed by desktop-install-file in EL-5 (the package fails build if no vendor tag is provided). So a bit of magic is needed in order to pass a correct argument, depending on the distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:06:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291906.m9TJ69Qx025708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-29 15:06:08 EDT --- I have a better understanding of the tcl guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291909.m9TJ9DBi026038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #25 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-29 15:09:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #21) > > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-6.fc9.src.rpm > - So for license "GPLv2+" for ext/q_parser.c can be ignored by Bison exception > term > (you can regard that ext/q_parser.c are under "BSD or GPLv2+") > Please use "BSD and MIT" for license tag. > Fixed > > I'm not sure whether I should package the tests provided with the gem in -doc > > or in the base package... Please advise. > I would move these files to -doc (if I create -doc subpackage), however > this is under your choise. > Moved the files to -doc subpackage for efficiency in production environments. > By the way: > - I recommend to use %{version} tag for Source0: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_.25.7Bversion.7D > > Also, the number "28549" in URL of Source0 will change each time the version > is upgraded. If you don't like this, gem has alternative URL: > http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem > Awesome, I didn't know this. Fixed. > - Please make it sure that the directory %{geminstdir} itself is also > owned by this package. Fixed. New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ferret.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 18:45:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459016] Review Request: bunny - Instrumented C code security fuzzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291845.m9TIjfDv021517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459016 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:20:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291920.m9TJKHn0028167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #8 from R P Herrold 2008-10-29 15:20:15 EDT --- yeah -- tcl-tile is not well formed either such that it gratuitously will fail a rebuild on RHEL 5 as well. I'll file a bug [herrold at centos-5 tcl-tile]$ sudo rpm -Uvh --test /home/herrold/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tcl-tile-0.8.2-5orc.x86_64.rpm [sudo] password for herrold: error: Failed dependencies: tcl(abi) = 8.5 is needed by tcl-tile-0.8.2-5orc.x86_64 [herrold at centos-5 tcl-tile]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:16:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291916.m9TJGOY9027499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |scummvm-tools Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-29 15:16:23 EDT --- Another happy ending :) ------------------------------------------------- This package (scummvm-tools) is APPROVED by oget. ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:29:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291929.m9TJT8q8029555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Lucian Langa 2008-10-29 15:29:07 EDT --- Thank you. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: scummvm-tools Short Description: Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language Owners: lucilanga Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:29:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291929.m9TJTD3A006584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-29 15:29:12 EDT --- I created tgz and uploaded it to fedorahosted.org. I added LICENSE file with copy of GPLv2 as well. Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon-1.8-1.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:30:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469080] New: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Summary: Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jon.hermansen at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://crowdsurfoffacliff.com/work/pidgin-musictracker.spec SRPM URL: http://crowdsurfoffacliff.com/work/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Musictracker is a plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in your status. Currently supported players: Amarok, Rhythmbox, Audacious, XMMS, MPC/MPD, Exaile, Banshee, Quod Libet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:33:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291933.m9TJXu2A007532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 --- Comment #1 from Jon Hermansen 2008-10-29 15:33:55 EDT --- Sorry, I neglected to mention that this is my first package, and also that I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:38:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291938.m9TJcTaR008615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #12 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-29 15:38:28 EDT --- > but the actual kernel module that sits on top of the library Rahul, you're misunderstanding the situation. There is no kernel module sitting on top of FUSE. This is a user-space library. Also your comment #8 seems to imply you consider ZFS to be a "proprietary" driver. This is simply not true. CDDL is a free and open-source license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:41:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291941.m9TJfr1q032299@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Jon Hermansen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:50:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291950.m9TJok1V001602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #9 from R P Herrold 2008-10-29 15:50:44 EDT --- filed at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469083 optionally, if a versioned tcl(api) is desired by you, it is a general solution patch I added there. -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:46:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291946.m9TJkwFJ000706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Dwayne Bailey 2008-10-29 15:46:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-Levenshtein Short Description: Python extension computing string distances and similarities Owners: dwayne Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:49:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291949.m9TJnHsU000995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #13 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-29 15:49:16 EDT --- Let's not argue about terminology. Call it whatever you want, my main point is this: There is CDDL licensed codebase (zfs) using the LGPL'ed libraries (fuse) which in turn uses a GPL'ed licensed codebase (ie) the Linux kernel. If the CDDL/GPL incompatibility can be bypassed by sticking a LGPL'ed library in between, we are setting precedent for others to do the same thing including proprietary kernel drivers. No, that does not imply ZFS is proprietary. I am very well aware that is it under a free and open source but GPL incompatible license aka CDDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 19:54:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810291954.m9TJsI0t011245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-29 15:54:17 EDT --- Well, there is a kernel module in this stack: /lib/modules/2.6.27.4-61.fc10.x86_64/kernel/fs/fuse/fuse.ko Sun is clearly working around the incompatibility between CDDL and GPL (one they explicitly created), but circumventing license incompatibility like this is not forbidden, in fact, it is almost certainly the main reason why the Fuse userspace is not GPL. In fact, they explicitly permit the scenario that Rahul is so concerned about in Comment #13: http://fuse.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/FAQ#Under_what_conditions_may_I_modify_or_distribute_FUSEx3f. There was never any requirement that any userspace code that leverages kernel code be compatible with the kernel license, for anything, otherwise, we'd have nothing but GPL compatible userspace. If it linked to GPL code, this would be a different scenario, but it does not. Nevertheless, I bounced this issue to RH Legal to get their feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:00:08 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292000.m9TK08HD012678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #15 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-29 16:00:07 EDT --- Rahul, your reasoning is not correct. There's a difference between "using" and "linked with". If the fuse user-space libraries were "linked" with the fuse kernel module (assuming this were technical possible, which it is not), your reasoning would be correct. Except they are not. The fuse user-space library interacts with the fuse kernel module, in much the same way all user-space components interact with kernel components, like NetworkManager interacts with wireless drivers for example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:11:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:11:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292011.m9TKBAWp005997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #16 from Rahul Sundaram 2008-10-29 16:11:08 EDT --- Derivative work is not merely confined to "linking" and IMO, there is a difference between a ported kernel module and other user-space applications regardless of anything in between like the stubs that Nvidia proprietary driver uses or others using fuse libraries. Anyway, there is no pointing in us arguing about it. I have expressed my concern and I will defer to Red Hat Legal who has the final say in this matter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:50:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:50:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467183] Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292050.m9TKog3S013184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467183 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:50:41 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:47:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292047.m9TKl62K012309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:47:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:48:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292048.m9TKmnNq012473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:48:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461575] Review Request: openvas-libraries - Support libraries for Open Vulnerability Assessment (OpenVAS) Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292049.m9TKnuxf012693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461575 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:49:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:53:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468848] Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292053.m9TKraIW013775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468848 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:53:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468846] Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292051.m9TKpH0J013495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468846 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:51:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292053.m9TKr3oT021770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 16:53:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:58:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292058.m9TKwW0I022826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 20:57:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292057.m9TKvTEl022621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-29 16:57:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ifstat Short Description: Interface statistics Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:01:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292101.m9TL1nQ2023673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-29 17:01:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wput Short Description: A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fabian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:02:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292102.m9TL21nI023868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:13:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:13:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292113.m9TLD2Ps018129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-29 17:13:01 EDT --- I am kind of lost here. If I build the package with tcl(abi) = 8.5 I cannot install it in, say, F8 (tcl(abi) = 8.4). Using the spec file I published here, I can build and install the rpm in F8, by using mock, and defining the tcl_version I want: mock -r fedora-8-i386 rebuild tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-2.fc8.src.rpm --define "tcl_version 8.4" But this does not work (install) for F6, or EL5 (I tried). In this case, as Jon said, the solution is not using any tcl(abi). What is the solution? Different .src.rpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:16:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292116.m9TLGTL7026551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:16:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:17:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: BkChem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292117.m9TLH0n6018972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 --- Comment #11 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2008-10-29 17:16:59 EDT --- This is an inportant bugfix: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.4/bkchem.spec http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/bkchem/0.12.4/bkchem-0.12.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292125.m9TLPB8G020377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:25:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:22:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292122.m9TLMMsu019822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com Flag|fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:22:21 EDT --- This seems to fail at least: "The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive; the version of the package must be the Gem's version " Can you please re-check against: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Gems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:29:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292129.m9TLTlqm020942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:29:46 EDT --- Oops. This looks like the request for bug 468799. Can you add another one here for this request and reset the flag? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292126.m9TLQSC4020678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:26:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:28:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292128.m9TLSd6J020816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:28:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:29:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292129.m9TLTv0v028343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:29:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:27:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292127.m9TLRQhG028171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:27:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:32:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292132.m9TLW5SN021602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:32:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:35:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292135.m9TLZh2f029662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:35:42 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:34:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292134.m9TLY2eL029190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:34:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:38:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187818] Review Request: ktorrent : KDE bittorrent client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292138.m9TLcG88022845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187818 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #48 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:38:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:37:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:37:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292137.m9TLbDVK029987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:37:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:41:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292141.m9TLf0eq030646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Homestead |Review Request: homestead |- 3D real-time network |- 3D real-time network |visualiser |visualiser --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:40:59 EDT --- ok, so we need to ping the packaging folks to handle the EL-5 case? Can one of you guys do that? Or would you like me to? Perhaps we can import this now, and hold off building EL-5 until that case is covered in the guidelines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:43:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292143.m9TLhtSx031123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-29 17:43:54 EDT --- In reply to comment #12: Sorry, I was out on vacation. I would be happy to give this a look over... Kanrip: Can you address the stuff in Comment #15 and then I can give it a look over too? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:49:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292149.m9TLnuAF031857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #29 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-29 17:49:54 EDT --- Thanks Kevin, but it's just a problem of finding an elegant solution in the spec, in order to not fork it between Fedora and Epel. I guess Simon will import it tomorrow, he + Russ + me were discussing about it less then an hour ago. That is, if Simon has the time to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:57:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292157.m9TLvUHZ026139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 21:56:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:56:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292156.m9TLuvvt000917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-29 17:56:56 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint shed-1.13-2.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPMs: [fab at laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint -i shed* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 [1] [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM upstream: d0a1aa6c30b907945608d478949a00ac2ef1b3f1783dbe391816665dc9cff423 SHA1SUM of package: d0a1aa6c30b907945608d478949a00ac2ef1b3f1783dbe391816665dc9cff423 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [?] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F9/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=911169 Tested F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=911159 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [1] License is GPLv2+. Take a look at the headers of the source: "or (at your option) any later version" If the license tag is fixed, I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 22:04:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292204.m9TM4UfZ002759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #11 from R P Herrold 2008-10-29 18:04:29 EDT --- see bug #469083 spot asserts that koji is too weak a tool to prevent a need for manual spec file edits to satisfy your use case. that bug was cloased, and I reopened and moved it to the koji component -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 22:09:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:09:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468643] Review Request: perl-Devel-GlobalDestruction - Expose PL_dirty In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292209.m9TM9qr5028899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468643 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-29 18:09:51 EDT --- Man, I hate it when I do that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 22:26:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292226.m9TMQllY008206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #17 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-29 18:26:46 EDT --- Uwe, some initial comments. First of all, this looks very good. You did a thorough job following the Fedora guidelines. - I wish the package were called "fuse-zfs" to be more similar with existing fuse packages, but in the absence of Fuse-specific package guidelines, it probably makes more sense to follow the upstream name for now... - Are you sure about the ppc* ExcludeArch's ? Existing fuse packages don't do it. Did you run into ppc-specific build issues ? - I wouldn't package the contrib init file, since you provide your own LSB-compliant one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 23:14:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468846] Review Request: hunspell-az - Azerbaijani hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292314.m9TNEKDR015989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468846 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 23:19:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468848] Review Request: hunspell-fa - Farsi hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292319.m9TNJGuC007836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468848 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 23:24:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469114] New: Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469114 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-mn - Mongolian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mn.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-mn-0.60.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: Mongolian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Oct 29 23:11:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468847] Review Request: hunspell-csb - Kashubian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810292311.m9TNBQuq015767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468847 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 00:06:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300006.m9U0652k023883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #12 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-29 20:06:04 EDT --- This way, at least I can create the rpm for F6, F8 or F9 passing the appropriate option to mock: --without abi or --define "tcl_version 8.4" ----------------------------------- %bcond_without abi # We used to define this dynamically, but the Fedora buildsystem chokes on # using this for the versioned Requires on tcl(abi), so we hardcode it. # This sucks, but there is no other clean way around it, because tcl # (and tclsh) aren't in the default buildroot. %{!?tcl_version: %define tcl_version 8.5} %{!?tcl_sitearch: %define tcl_sitearch tcl%{tcl_version}} %define real_name mysqltcl Summary: MySQL interface for Tcl Name: tcl-mysqltcl Version: 3.05 Release: 2%{?dist} License: BSD Group: Development/Languages Source: http://www.xdobry.de/mysqltcl/%{real_name}-%{version}.tar.gz URL: http://www.xdobry.de/mysqltcl BuildRequires: mysql-devel BuildRequires: tcl-devel >= 8.3.1 %{?with_abi:Requires: tcl(abi) = %{tcl_version}} Buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Provides: %{real_name} = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: %{real_name} < %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 01:58:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:58:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300158.m9U1wEK1009770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-29 21:58:12 EDT --- tagged/built for all branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 01:59:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300159.m9U1xHSK009868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-29 21:59:16 EDT --- tagged/built for all branches (still awaiting response from upstream re. library-calls-exit issue) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 01:57:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466047] Review Request: tcl-mysqltcl - MySQL interface for Tcl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300157.m9U1vqdm009705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466047 --- Comment #13 from Rene Ploetz 2008-10-29 21:57:51 EDT --- Thanks for all your replies, I updated the spec file and srpm with the suggestions made in comment #1 I also added the "--without abi" switch which I hope is sufficient for both the tcl guidelines and building on EL5. The file locations are: Spec URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reneploetz.de/fedora/tcl-mysqltcl-3.05-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:15:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465928] Review Request: fbterm - a fast terminal emulator for linux with frame buffer device In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300315.m9U3FaGG023239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465928 Ding-Yi Chen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:37:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300337.m9U3blGx016204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #20 from Tim Potter 2008-10-29 23:37:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I've updated the packaging as follows: python-pywbem.src: Happy to fix but I don't know which file the error message is referring to! mof_compiler.py: This file can actually be run as a standalone executable, or included as a module. Personally I've used it more as an import so might just leave it in the site-packages directory and add permissions. I'll check with the other PyWBEM author. wbemcli.py: This is very handy. I added it as a script to setup.py and it ended up being installed in /usr/bin which would be great. Are there any policy problems with a python package installing stuff into /usr? changelog: I added an entry for 0.7-1 after I uploaded the spec file so the error should be fixed now. license: Hmm - the intent was LGPLv2 only. I'll try and sort this out upstream. The adding of the LICENSE.txt file is a bit of a hack. Also need to coordinate this with upstream. Thanks again! Tim. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:40:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469134] New: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Summary: Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: orcanbahri at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-archive-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: deco-archive provides support for popular archive formats to the deco file extraction framework. -- This package is a companion to deco (Bug# 444366). Neither packages mean much without each other hence I made them require and block each other. If you have a better idea for the dependencies I am wide open to accept. There are three types of rpmlint errors/warnings from the deco-archive package that will be built, which can all be ignored: * deco.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%trigger I used the %trigger functions for installing support for "non-default" formats as Ville suggested in Bug# 444366 . This results in these "dangerous commands". * deco.x86_64: E: zero-length All zero length files are needed by the program * deco.x86_64: E: compressed-symlink-with-wrong-ext These kinds of files are needed by the program too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:42:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300342.m9U3g1Yi027192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469134 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:42:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469134] Review Request: deco-archive - Extraction scripts for various archive formats for use of deco In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300342.m9U3g0tn027163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469134 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |444366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:50:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444366] Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300350.m9U3odnY018059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-29 23:50:37 EDT --- I separated deco-archive from deco (Bug# 469134). Therefore one of them will not need to be rebuilt everytime the other one is updated by the upstream. Right now, there is a circular dependency between the two packages. I'm not sure if this is allowed. But obviously they both need each other. Any ideas are welcome. Also, because of the separation, the rpmlint output for deco is silent now. Those messages made a trip to deco-archive. The new files are: SPEC: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco.spec SRPM: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/deco-1.5.6-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 03:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300351.m9U3pWZr028786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2008-10-29 23:51:31 EDT --- FYI, the spaces-and-tabs thing is referring to the .spec file. If you have scripts that you expect people to actually run, they should be in /usr/bin and not buried in some python directory. It's perfectly acceptable for a python package to install executables in /usr/bin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 06:20:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300620.m9U6K4af006947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 02:20:03 EDT --- python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 06:24:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300624.m9U6OALC018322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 02:24:09 EDT --- scummvm-tools-0.12.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/scummvm-tools-0.12.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 06:25:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:25:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467293] Review Request: scummvm-tools - Tools for scummVM / S.C.U.M.M scripting language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300625.m9U6Pb1C018730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467293 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 06:40:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300640.m9U6eQe0020649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 02:40:24 EDT --- I reviewed ImageMagick. It needs some work to yield the guidelines: * Latest version is not packaged. At the time of this review, version 6.4.5-0 was out. * The %{VER} & %{Patchlevel} trick in the beginning of the spec file may not be needed now because the source URL of the new version contains "-0" already. * The files Magick++/{AUTHORS,ChangeLog,LICENSE,NEWS,README} must be included in the %doc of ImageMagick-c++ subpackage. * The directories Magick++/demo (and maybe Magick++/tests} and its contents should be included in the %doc of ImageMagick-c++-devel subpackage. * %{name} macro is used inconsistently. In some places ImageMagick is used, whereas in some other places %{name} is used. The latter is preferred in all occasions. Another inconsistency is: you use regular notation for all the commands (mv,rm,sed etc.) but for perl you use %{__perl}. * We recommend %defattr(-root,root,-) * The extra specification for two of the files %attr(755,root,root) is redundant because these files already have the right permissions. * Parallel make should be enabled. If the package doesn't compile with parallel make you should note this in the SPEC file. * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. In my mock build the current ImageMagick rpm contains .la files in /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.4.0/modules-Q16/coders/ * If you don't want to build the modules you can use configure's --with-modules=no option * The documentation is very large. It should go to a subpackage. Btw, why is %{_datadir}/doc/ImageMagick* not in the %doc ? Maybe this should go to the the -doc subpackage. * I don't think these are needed for building: BuildRequires: automake >= 1.7 autoconf >= 2.58, libtool >= 1.5 Afaik, this one is not supported anymore, can be removed: BuildRequires: libungif-devel Since you BR: perl-devel already, you won't need BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker), perl * Double BR: freetype-devel * Is there a particular reason why you don't Require: libpng-devel,libtiff-devel,libwmf-devel,libxml2-devel in the -devel package? * You might want to use the "--enable_static=no" flag for faster compilation. This might also save some lines (from the SPEC) file dedicated to removing the static libraries. * It would be nice if you explain in the SPEC file what the patches and sed's do. * Source1 is not used. * Why are these files removed? find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.bs" |xargs rm -f find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name ".packlist" |xargs rm -f find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "perllocal.pod" |xargs rm -f * Adding djvu and jbig supports will be nice (although not necessary). * DIE_RPATH_DIE is cool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 06:49:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300649.m9U6nH6u021548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 02:49:16 EDT --- Added Hans' email to CC since he did the last known maintenance. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 07:01:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300701.m9U71lZA023478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 03:01:46 EDT --- Additionally, * There is a script in the source that builds the docs for the C API. It would be nice to build it and include in the -devel or -doc package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 07:05:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300705.m9U75fEf012947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018 Bug 435018 depends on bug 435015, which changed state. Bug 435015 Summary: Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 07:05:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435015] Review Request: gpp4 - LGPL CCP4 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300705.m9U75ePX012927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 03:05:37 EDT --- Okay, please submit push request on bodhi for F-9 (and F-10 later). Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 07:20:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300720.m9U7KpRk026038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-30 03:20:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * The %{VER} & %{Patchlevel} trick in the beginning of the spec file may > not be needed now because the source URL of the new version contains "-0" > already. It IMHO is still needed, because a "-0" is a real exception by that upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 08:22:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467183] Review Request: hunspell-mt - Maltese hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300822.m9U8M46A026380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467183 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 08:53:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 04:53:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300853.m9U8rY7m009881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #8 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-30 04:53:32 EDT --- 1) fixed, I compile with --disable-static now. I wonder why the .a were packaged - let's hope it won't break anything important. 2) fixed, desktop-file-validate does not report any problem now. New build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68082 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 09:32:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300932.m9U9WxSG007117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #11 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-30 05:32:58 EDT --- Revised packaging strategy as far as that is concerned: New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-mocha.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/rubygem-mocha-0.9.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 09:56:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300956.m9U9ufUA012127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Bug 454408 depends on bug 467260, which changed state. Bug 467260 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 09:56:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467260] Review Request: mingw32-filesystem - MinGW base filesystem and environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810300956.m9U9ueo5012098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467260 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-30 05:56:38 EDT --- devel done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=912137 F-10 done: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=912138 EL-5 uid 603 Thanks for Jason & Kevin's help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 10:04:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:04:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301004.m9UA44W4023810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-30 06:04:03 EDT --- The only rpmlint output is: mingw32-binutils.i386: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 We've requested an exception for this (bug 468981). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 10:18:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301018.m9UAInc5026675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-30 06:18:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Added Hans' email to CC since he did the last known maintenance. Sorry if this > was not desired. Yes, Norm Murray seems to not have too much time to spend on ImageMagick, so I've been co-maintaining and really doing most of the work lately. I'll take a look at fixing the issues you've mentioned, but I want to do that in a new branch for F-11, so first: Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ImageMagick New Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 10:35:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301035.m9UAZ9vN019502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-30 06:35:07 EDT --- Hi all, As can be seen from the ChangeLog I'm a co-maintainer of xfig and I've been doing most of the work on xfig lately. While looking at open xfig bugs to fix, I forgot to look for a merge review. But I've found it now :) So I'll be working on fixing the small list of Issues mentioned by Patrice. (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint says: > xfig.i386: W: no-documentation > xfig.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xfig-Xaw3d > xfig-plain.i386: W: no-documentation > xfig-common.i386: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/xfig/Libraries/Maps/USA/assemble 0644 > xfig-common.i386: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/xfig/Libraries/Maps/Canada/assemble 0644 > > The xfig.i386: W: obsolete-not-provided xfig-Xaw3d should certainly > be fixed. > Will do. > I think that the non-executable script should be ignored, otherwise > csh will become a dependency. Maybe a comment could be added (when > doing chmods in %prep?). > Actually, I just tried them and those scripts are broken (tail +# should be tail -n +#), and the output of them is already included, these are really utility scripts for people editing these maps, so I think it would be best to completely remove them, agreed? > Some timestamps could be kept, for example after the iconv call, > there could be > touch -r $i $i.UTF-8 > But fixing all would require more work, not really that important. > I'll fix the easy ones. > I would have preferred to have virtual provides with parenthesis > like %{name}(executable) > I agree, but it is too late for that now. I don't want to make changes to the F-10 version of xfig so late in the game, so I'm first going to do a branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 10:36:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301036.m9UAanmJ019903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-30 06:36:49 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xfig New Branches: F-10 Note this is an early branch request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 11:17:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301117.m9UBH9FR028504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #17 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-30 07:17:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Well, from very quick glance: > > * Using /var/www is not allowed on Fedora > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Web_Applications > Moved to /usr/share/genome-styling/{html,scripts} > * License tag should be "GPLv2+" > Note that only putting GPLv2 license text does not mean > that the license is under GPLv2: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ > Fixed. > * Usually dependencies between main package and subpackages > must be EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) specific > (ref: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines > "MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages..." > This mentions only main <-> -devel packages, however > this should usually be applied to any binary rpms generated > from the same srpm) > Fixed. > * Virtual Provides must usually be EVR specific (Vitual Provides > without EVR information caused upgrading path problem many > times...) > Fixed. > * "Requires: genome" is redundant when "Requires: gnome-lib" is > present (currently, however see below) > > * I guess that the dependency between genome and genome-lib > is opposite > It allows for faster dep-solving if Requires: genome is in the requires for a package next to Requires: genome-lib, because the "new" deps won't have to be looped through (the dep is already resolved during the first run in the loop) > * You have to write "BuildArch: noarch" only on the main > package (and don't have to write on each subpackages) > Removed the redundant BuildArch: noarch > * Use "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)", not rubygem-rake. > c.f. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides > - By the way "BuildRequires: rubygem" is redundant when > "BuildRequires: rubygem(rake)" is present. > Fixed. > * When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option > to keep timestamps on installed files: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > Fixed. > * The scripts related to SysVinit script are wrong at > several points. > Also some Requires(preun) or so are missing. > > Please refer to: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax > Fixed. > * Please make it sure that directories which are created when > installing a package are correctly owned by the package. > There are some directories which are not owned by any packages > or when the package is installed: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories > I think I got this one nailed but I'd appreciate some verification. > * We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > Also on some subpackages %defattr is completely missing > (please use rpmlint to detect this type of packagins error) > rpmlint does not say anything about missing defattr's > * Files under %_datadir/doc are automatically marked as %doc > I'm not sure what this means. I get what it means but I'm not sure what it applies to as far as the package is concerned. > * %_sysconfdir/init.d must be %_initrddir > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem > Fixed. > * /var must be %_localstatedir or so: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros > Fixed > * Please use macros consistently. For example at one place %{_bindir} > is used (this is no problem because %{_bindir} is expanded as /usr/bin) > where at other place /%{_bindir} (i.e. //usr/bin) is used. > Which ends up being the same but I see what you mean; in accumulative paths though, such as %{buildroot}/%{_bindir} I do like to use the possibly redundant '/' (it's better to my eyes *and* I'm not dependent on whether %{_bindir} or %{bindir} has a prepending slash or is fully qualified or not). In %files sections though; fixed > I just glanced at your spec file quickly and examined license issue and > have not checked the details of this package. The largest part of the spec file comes directly from upstream, Red Hat's Emerging Technologies team, which is also the reason I've not closely examined the License that they choose to initially package genome with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:15:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301215.m9UCF7ME017788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #18 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-30 08:15:06 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/genome.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/genome-1.4.2-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:19:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301219.m9UCJQvx018474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #19 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-30 08:19:25 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/genome.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f9/SRPMS/genome-1.4.2-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:26:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301226.m9UCQm3o020185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #30 from manuel wolfshant 2008-10-30 08:26:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321923) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321923) conditionally use --vendor if building in epel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:23:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301223.m9UCNuLh019406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Pavel Alexeev changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.spb.su --- Comment #1 from Pavel Alexeev 2008-10-30 08:23:55 EDT --- If it fuse filesystem may be name should be like "fuse-bind" or "fuse-bindfs"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:31:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301231.m9UCViW6010027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #17 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 08:31:43 EDT --- Hi, Jon the owner of tcl-mysqltcl have posted another .src.rpm, which I think is adequate, based on the discussion we had there. Should I make a final evaluation of tcl-mysqltcl, or this is not necessary? I have also oppened a Fedora account (user roma). Can you add your name there as my sponsor? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:44:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:44:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301244.m9UCi1tp022974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 08:44:00 EDT --- I think I've seen enough evidence that you're on the right track, and your package is ready, so APPROVED and I've sponsored your account. Go ahead and import and build, and ping me with any questions. Also feel free to go back to any of the practice reviews and work them to completion, since you can now review officially and approve once ready. I'd also advise doing reviews for others regularly, it's good practice and a great way to learn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCoR6k014073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:50:26 EDT --- httperf-0.9.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:49:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460707] Review Request: httperf - Tool for measuring web server performance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301249.m9UCnfYD013439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460707 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:49:40 EDT --- httperf-0.9.0-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCohbn014163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:50:41 EDT --- rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCoYig014121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:50:33 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCo4jQ013839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:50:03 EDT --- rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:47:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:47:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301247.m9UCltaT013004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:47:54 EDT --- rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:47:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301247.m9UClv1v013037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCo7iQ013890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:47:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301247.m9UClpDh012977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:47:50 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-GeneR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:51:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301251.m9UCpPQB025180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:51:24 EDT --- primer3-1.1.4-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCoJ7B024768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:50:18 EDT --- rubygem-picnic-0.6.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:49:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461897] Review Request: opticalraytracer - OpticalRayTracer is a Linux utility that analyzes systems of lenses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301249.m9UCn7JG024196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461897 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:49:07 EDT --- opticalraytracer-1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:50:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301250.m9UCoMsj024801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:55:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301255.m9UCtavW015928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:55:35 EDT --- primer3-1.1.4-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:54:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301254.m9UCsWUl015380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:54:31 EDT --- cfdg-2.1-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCr322015053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:53:03 EDT --- rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:55:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301255.m9UCth3u016039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:55:43 EDT --- rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCrIPs015125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:53:17 EDT --- gwibber-0.7-5.102bzr.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:51:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459886] Review Request: rubygem-main - A class factory and dsl for generating command line programs real quick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301251.m9UCpI1t014654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459886 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:51:18 EDT --- rubygem-main-2.8.2-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:51:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468559] Review Request: rubygem-facets - The single most extensive additions and extensions library available for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301251.m9UCpWEr014747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468559 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:51:32 EDT --- rubygem-facets-2.4.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:51:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457038] Review Request: primer3 - PCR primer design tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301251.m9UCpSrB014704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457038 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:52:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301252.m9UCq2Sv014892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:52:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301252.m9UCqa0p025984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:52:35 EDT --- rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:51:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459890] Review Request: rubygem-markaby - Markup as Ruby, write HTML in your native Ruby tongue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301251.m9UCpxIc025578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459890 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:51:58 EDT --- rubygem-markaby-0.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCrREO026198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:53:27 EDT --- rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:52:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301252.m9UCqS6N025893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:56:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465750] Review Request: R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301256.m9UCuPtK027350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:56:25 EDT --- R-GeneR-2.11.1-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-GeneR'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:55:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301255.m9UCtraL027125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:54:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452107] Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301254.m9UCsZRY026447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:55:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301255.m9UCto6c027086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:55:49 EDT --- python-rabbyt-0.8.2-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:52:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301252.m9UCqOBd025758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:52:24 EDT --- rubygem-pervasives-1.1.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:54:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301254.m9UCsovo026509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:54:50 EDT --- rubygem-reststop-0.3.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457808] Review Request: gwibber - An open source microblogging client for GNOME developed with Python and GTK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCrNo9026167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457808 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:52:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301252.m9UCqdX6026021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459881] Review Request: rubygem-sqlite3-ruby - Allows Ruby scripts to interface with a SQLite3 database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCrfgT026280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459881 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 08:53:40 EDT --- rubygem-sqlite3-ruby-1.2.4-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467348] Review Request: rubygem-reststop - Convenient RESTfulness for all your Camping controller needs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301253.m9UCrU0v026235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467348 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 12:58:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469027] Review Request: bindfs - Fuse filesystem to mirror a directory In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301258.m9UCwsi6016908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469027 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name --- Comment #2 from Till Maas 2008-10-30 08:58:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > If it fuse filesystem may be name should be like "fuse-bind" or "fuse-bindfs"? There is nothing about fuse in the naming guidelines and there are already other fuse filesystems in Fedora that do not use fuse in their name, e.g. curlftpfs funionfs obexfs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:12:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301312.m9UDCubZ031392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 Patrick Steiner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |patrick.steiner at a1.net --- Comment #25 from Patrick Steiner 2008-10-30 09:12:54 EDT --- I have updated the spec file to version 1.2.5 The files are available at: http://law.hostsen.net/fedora/blueproximity/blueproximity.spec http://law.hostsen.net/fedora/blueproximity/blueproximity-1.2.5-1.fc9.src.rpm http://law.hostsen.net/fedora/blueproximity/blueproximity-1.2.5-1.fc9.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:21:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301321.m9UDL4s6000577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-30 09:21:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Nevertheless, I bounced this issue to RH Legal to get their feedback. RH Legal confirms that this is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:39:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468562] Review Request: basket - Taking care of your ideas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301339.m9UDdNvT003878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468562 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2008-10-30 09:39:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I had to make a couple changes so here are new URLs: > > Spec URL: > http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1phVJHr_dSr1gMt0-rHuTVAAUTrX26o8YAnkwqvlxzL4LOLRUxKl5GDl8ohc8QJL15RsU9md2O_PPWC_7Hv5uNOg/basket.spec?download > > SRPM URL: > http://8uxodw.bay.livefilestore.com/y1pShllREhh39cP2V-sNezg4d6KwykdOHLVDBpDfaDdJDNACluD0spLx3PSi7-UQiwHzprAM7W-fxo/basket-1.0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm?download > > Output of rpmlint: > > basket.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 29, tab: line 5) > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > ^^^ Ignoring this one because it's just complaining about my formatting. > I know it may seem a bit pedantic, but this is a MUST FIX item, iow not something to be ignored. Mixing spaces and tabs is bad. So choose one and stick to it, note that the Fedora standard more or less is to use spaces, but tabs are allowed too if you prefer as long as you are consistent. > basket.i386: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/basket-1.0.3.1/AUTHORS > ^^^ Ignoring the first warning because the authors name has a ? and a ? in it. This is another MUST FIX item, the trick is to change the encoding in %setup using iconv, so in this case you should add the following lines under %setup: iconv -f ISO_8859-1 -t UTF-8 AUTHORS > AUTHORS.tmp touch -r AUTHORS AUTHORS.tmp mv AUTHORS.tmp AUTHORS > basket.i386: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libbasketcommon.so libbasketcommon.so > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. > I'm not sure what to do about the second error. Is there even a way I can fix > that or is it an upstream problem? With new packages we normally fix issues like this with Fedora specific patches, but given that this package is already in Fedora, I think we can leave this as is for now. You should file a bug upstream though, asking them to change this into a properly versioned .so file with a proper soname. I've done a review of this package, which besides the things mentioned above also has found the following issues: MUST FIX -------- * This line in the 2 post script is wrong: -p /sbin/ldconfig That should be just: /sbin/ldconfig SHOULD FIX ---------- * Update the description as discussed in previous comments -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:56:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301356.m9UDujgO007928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #31 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-30 09:56:43 EDT --- done! SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.87/homestead.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/homestead-0.87/homestead-0.87-2.fc10.src.rpm thank you manuel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301353.m9UDreit007080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #48 from Jussi Lehtola 2008-10-30 09:53:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > (In reply to comment #46) > > Did you build the EL-5 branch yet? The packages aren't available yet in EPEL > > testing.. > > Ah, had my plague client misconfigured. Fixed and builds submitted. Now python-pmw has appeared in EPEL testing, but pymol is still missing.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:55:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301355.m9UDtPhw007624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #19 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 09:55:23 EDT --- Hi, Jon no doubt that the revision process, of even apparently simple packages, is not as easy as I thought it would be. Furthermore, the quick response of several other packages is really amazing. I have submitted, some time ago, an interesting python package called pygle: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Would you mind taking a look at it? Thanks for you patience and guidance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:59:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301359.m9UDxNvV029421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 13:59:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301359.m9UDx3WE008304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 09:59:02 EDT --- Sure, want to take a look at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 cfdg, the dep, is just hitting F-9 now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:08:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301408.m9UE8Mfr010321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2008-10-30 10:08:21 EDT --- OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:19:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301419.m9UEJXrg012538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #3 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-30 10:19:32 EDT --- please modify this: ---------------------------------- BuildRequires: mpfr-devel ---------------------------------- to ---------------------------------- %if 0%{?fedora} >= 9 BuildRequires: mpfr-devel %endif ---------------------------------- in order to be able to build on rhel-5 ie. EPEL-5 too. on rhel-5 gmp contains mpfr (so gmp-devel contains mpfr-devel) that's the reason of the above request. thanks. anyway i'm in process to rebuild most of the mingw32 packages on rhel-5 and will let you know if i'll other problems with other packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:26:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301426.m9UEQkKK003110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 10:26:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed > > in the spec. In my mock build the current ImageMagick rpm contains .la files in > > /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.4.0/modules-Q16/coders/ > > > > * If you don't want to build the modules you can use configure's > > --with-modules=no > > option > > For reference, see 185237 This is bug 185237 ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:26:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301426.m9UEQALb003048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 10:26:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed > in the spec. In my mock build the current ImageMagick rpm contains .la files in > /usr/lib64/ImageMagick-6.4.0/modules-Q16/coders/ > > * If you don't want to build the modules you can use configure's > --with-modules=no > option For reference, see 185237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:29:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301429.m9UETR0W014498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-30 10:29:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > please modify this: > ---------------------------------- > BuildRequires: mpfr-devel > ---------------------------------- > to > ---------------------------------- > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 9 > BuildRequires: mpfr-devel > %endif > ---------------------------------- > in order to be able to build on rhel-5 ie. EPEL-5 too. > on rhel-5 gmp contains mpfr (so gmp-devel contains mpfr-devel) that's the > reason of the above request. OK, done that. I'll follow up with the spec file and new SRPM once they've rebuilt. > anyway i'm in process to rebuild most of the mingw32 packages on rhel-5 and > will let you know if i'll other problems with other packages. Thanks. I'm going to add these to EPEL-5 as they get approved, so it'll be nice to see if you have any build problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:35:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469189] New: Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 Summary: Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: svidal at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/system-autodeath/system-autodeath.spec SRPM URL: http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/system-autodeath/system-autodeath-0.2-0.src.rpm Description: system-autodeath is a cron job that runs daily, checking the current time versus a configured death date for the machine. Within one week of this date the system will emit log notices to syslog.alert notifying that the system with autodie on a specific date. On the date the system will have its default route deleted. It will continue to do this everyday until someone does something about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:38:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301438.m9UEc2LV007879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-30 10:38:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tcl-tktreectrl Short Description: Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk Owners: spot Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-8 F-9 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 14:48:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:48:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301448.m9UEmRSX018492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-30 10:48:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=8ffb9d18ededf10101ae623d42ea00e9ef167045;path=/gcc/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gcc-4.3.2-8.fc9.src.rpm * Thu Oct 30 2008 Richard W.M. Jones - 4.3.2-8 - Don't BR mpfr-devel for RHEL/EPEL-5 (Levente Farkas). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:05:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199154] Review Request: Slony-1 (postgresql-slony-engine) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301505.m9UF5mel014896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199154 --- Comment #42 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2008-10-30 11:05:42 EDT --- Devrim slony-II is a dead project ? why not call it as slony instead slony1 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:14:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:14:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301514.m9UFEXtr032345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 11:14:32 EDT --- rpmlint clean on SRPM. rpmlint on rpms: python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/hello_world.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/events.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/window_platform_event.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/image_viewer.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/fixed_resolution.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/html_label.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/noisy/noisy.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/astraea/assets/app.ico The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/events.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/image_convert.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/timer.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/opengl.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/animation.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/graphics.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/video.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/astraea/setup.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/image_display.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/multiple_windows.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/window_subclass.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/media_player.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/astraea/astraea.py The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/astraea/astraea.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/astraea/setup.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/events.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/fixed_resolution.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/graphics.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/html_label.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/image_convert.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/image_display.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/media_player.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/multiple_windows.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/noisy/noisy.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/opengl.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/animation.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/events.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/hello_world.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/image_viewer.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/window_subclass.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/timer.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/video.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. python-pyglet-doc.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/window_platform_event.py /usr/bin/env An included file marked as %doc creates a possible additional dependency in the package. Usually, this is not wanted and may be caused by eg. example scripts with executable bits set included in the package's documentation. One other thing before we get too far, what steps have you taken to remove support for mp3, WMA, WMV, and any other patent-encumbered codecs? Might be something you could split off into a -bad rpm and maintain that in rpmfusion. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ForbiddenItems -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:33:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301533.m9UFX63l020423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #6 from Till Maas 2008-10-30 11:33:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/gpscorrelate-1.5.7-2.tillf8.src.rpm Here is an update. I still do not have an icon, but I asked upstream about it and will ask the art project, if he does not have one. This package now contains an extended version of the debian manpage and some new patches, to reduce the amount of compiler warnings and to include the manpage and desktop file intallation in the makefile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:34:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:34:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301534.m9UFYixu004014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tim.lauridsen at googlemail.co | |m Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-30 11:34:43 EDT --- i will review this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454410] Review Request: mingw32-gcc - MinGW Windows cross-compiler (GCC) for C and C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301548.m9UFm3TH023457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454410 --- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-30 11:48:02 EDT --- FYI: epel-5 rpms (those which needed for me:-) can be found in my repo (when it's upload finish): http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/ the old mingw rpms are also there but the new ones are "mingw32-xxx" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:49:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301549.m9UFni7F007033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-30 11:49:44 EDT --- Preliminary stuff: rpmlint system-autodeath-0.2-0.src.rpm system-autodeath.src: W: no-%build-section system-autodeath.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. system-autodeath.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog system-autodeath.src: W: strange-permission system-autodeath.spec 0600 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. * Add an empty %build section * remove ending '.' in summary * all changlog entries need to be in same format (with / without version) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 15:59:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301559.m9UFxwxx009664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #1 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-30 11:59:56 EDT --- on rhel-5 i've got this error while try to rebuild this package. is there any tip what can be the reason?: creating libxml_rpl.la (cd .libs && rm -f libxml_rpl.la && ln -s ../libxml_rpl.la libxml_rpl.la) /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -g -O2 -release 0.17 ../intl/libintl.la -L/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -liconv -R/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -L/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -liconv -R/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -lc -no-undefined -Wl,--export-all-symbols -L/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -liconv -R/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib -Wl,--disable-auto-import -o libgettextlib.la -rpath /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib areadlink.lo gl_array_list.lo backupfile.lo addext.lo basename.lo c-ctype.lo c-strcasecmp.lo c-strncasecmp.lo c-strcasestr.lo c-strstr.lo classpath.lo clean-temp.lo closeout.lo copy-file.lo csharpcomp.lo csharpexec.lo error-progname.lo execute.lo exitfail.lo fatal-signal.lo fd-ostream.lo file-ostream.lo concat-filename.lo findprog.lo fstrcmp.lo full-write.lo fwriteerror.lo gcd.lo ../woe32dll/gettextlib-exports.lo hash.lo html-ostream.lo ../woe32dll/c++html-styled-ostream.lo javacomp.lo javaexec.lo javaversion.lo linebreak.lo gl_linkedhash_list.lo gl_list.lo localcharset.lo localename.lo lock.lo malloca.lo mbchar.lo mbslen.lo mbsstr.lo mbswidth.lo ostream.lo pipe.lo progname.lo propername.lo quote.lo quotearg.lo sh-quote.lo striconv.lo strnlen1.lo styled-ostream.lo term-ostream.lo ../woe32dll/c++term-styled-ostream.lo tls.lo tmpdir.lo uniname/uniname.lo unistr/u16-mbtouc.lo unistr/u16-mbtouc-aux.lo unistr/u16-mbtouc-unsafe.lo unistr/u16-mbtouc-unsafe-aux.lo unistr/u8-mbtouc.lo unistr/u8-mbtouc-aux.lo unistr/u8-mbtouc-unsafe.lo unistr/u8-mbtouc-unsafe-aux.lo unistr/u8-uctomb.lo unistr/u8-uctomb-aux.lo uniwidth/width.lo wait-process.lo xmalloc.lo xstrdup.lo xerror.lo xmalloca.lo xreadlink.lo xsetenv.lo xstriconv.lo xvasprintf.lo xasprintf.lo acl.lo argmatch.lo asnprintf.lo canonicalize-lgpl.lo error.lo file-has-acl.lo fnmatch.lo fopen.lo getdelim.lo getline.lo gettimeofday.lo malloc.lo mkdtemp.lo obstack.lo open.lo printf-args.lo printf-parse.lo readlink.lo realloc.lo safe-read.lo safe-write.lo setenv.lo sigprocmask.lo stpcpy.lo stpncpy.lo strnlen.lo tempname.lo tparm.lo tputs.lo unsetenv.lo vasnprintf.lo vasprintf.lo wcwidth.lo libcroco_rpl.la libglib_rpl.la libxml_rpl.la i686-pc-mingw32-g++ -shared -nostdlib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/dllcrt2.o /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.3.2/crtbegin.o .libs/areadlink.o .libs/gl_array_list.o .libs/backupfile.o .libs/addext.o .libs/basename.o .libs/c-ctype.o .libs/c-strcasecmp.o .libs/c-strncasecmp.o .libs/c-strcasestr.o .libs/c-strstr.o .libs/classpath.o .libs/clean-temp.o .libs/closeout.o .libs/copy-file.o .libs/csharpcomp.o .libs/csharpexec.o .libs/error-progname.o .libs/execute.o .libs/exitfail.o .libs/fatal-signal.o .libs/fd-ostream.o .libs/file-ostream.o .libs/concat-filename.o .libs/findprog.o .libs/fstrcmp.o .libs/full-write.o .libs/fwriteerror.o .libs/gcd.o ../woe32dll/.libs/gettextlib-exports.o .libs/hash.o .libs/html-ostream.o ../woe32dll/.libs/c++html-styled-ostream.o .libs/javacomp.o .libs/javaexec.o .libs/javaversion.o .libs/linebreak.o .libs/gl_linkedhash_list.o .libs/gl_list.o .libs/localcharset.o .libs/localename.o .libs/lock.o .libs/malloca.o .libs/mbchar.o .libs/mbslen.o .libs/mbsstr.o .libs/mbswidth.o .libs/ostream.o .libs/pipe.o .libs/progname.o .libs/propername.o .libs/quote.o .libs/quotearg.o .libs/sh-quote.o .libs/striconv.o .libs/strnlen1.o .libs/styled-ostream.o .libs/term-ostream.o ../woe32dll/.libs/c++term-styled-ostream.o .libs/tls.o .libs/tmpdir.o uniname/.libs/uniname.o unistr/.libs/u16-mbtouc.o unistr/.libs/u16-mbtouc-aux.o unistr/.libs/u16-mbtouc-unsafe.o unistr/.libs/u16-mbtouc-unsafe-aux.o unistr/.libs/u8-mbtouc.o unistr/.libs/u8-mbtouc-aux.o unistr/.libs/u8-mbtouc-unsafe.o unistr/.libs/u8-mbtouc-unsafe-aux.o unistr/.libs/u8-uctomb.o unistr/.libs/u8-uctomb-aux.o uniwidth/.libs/width.o .libs/wait-process.o .libs/xmalloc.o .libs/xstrdup.o .libs/xerror.o .libs/xmalloca.o .libs/xreadlink.o .libs/xsetenv.o .libs/xstriconv.o .libs/xvasprintf.o .libs/xasprintf.o .libs/acl.o .libs/argmatch.o .libs/asnprintf.o .libs/canonicalize-lgpl.o .libs/error.o .libs/file-has-acl.o .libs/fnmatch.o .libs/fopen.o .libs/getdelim.o .libs/getline.o .libs/gettimeofday.o .libs/malloc.o .libs/mkdtemp.o .libs/obstack.o .libs/open.o .libs/printf-args.o .libs/printf-parse.o .libs/readlink.o .libs/realloc.o .libs/safe-read.o .libs/safe-write.o .libs/setenv.o .libs/sigprocmask.o .libs/stpcpy.o .libs/stpncpy.o .libs/strnlen.o .libs/tempname.o .libs/tparm.o .libs/tputs.o .libs/unsetenv.o .libs/vasnprintf.o .libs/vasprintf.o .libs/wcwidth.o -Wl,--whole-archive ./.libs/libcroco_rpl.a ./.libs/libglib_rpl.a ./.libs/libxml_rpl.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive ../intl/.libs/libintl.dll.a -L/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libiconv.dll.a -L/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.3.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.3.2/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/lib -lstdc++ -lmingw32 -lgcc -lmoldname -lmingwex -lmsvcrt -luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lmingw32 -lgcc -lmoldname -lmingwex -lmsvcrt /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/4.3.2/crtend.o -Wl,--export-all-symbols -Wl,--disable-auto-import -o .libs/libgettextlib-0-17.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base -Xlinker --out-implib -Xlinker .libs/libgettextlib.dll.a Creating library file: .libs/libgettextlib.dll.a Cannot export rpl_optarg: symbol not defined Cannot export rpl_optind: symbol not defined ../woe32dll/.libs/gettextlib-exports.o:gettextlib-exports.c:(.data+0x24): undefined reference to `_rpl_optarg' ../woe32dll/.libs/gettextlib-exports.o:gettextlib-exports.c:(.data+0x28): undefined reference to `_rpl_optind' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[4]: *** [libgettextlib.la] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/gettext-0.17/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib' make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/gettext-0.17/gettext-tools/gnulib-lib' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/gettext-0.17/gettext-tools' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/lfarkas/rpm/BUILD/gettext-0.17/gettext-tools' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73396 (%build) RPM build errors: user mockbuild does not exist - using root group mockbuild does not exist - using root user mockbuild does not exist - using root group mockbuild does not exist - using root Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.73396 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:04:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301604.m9UG4s1B026499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 12:04:53 EDT --- Hi, I knew about these warnings, and this is what I wanted to ask you. Where do examples go? Suze has a python-pyglet and the examples are in python-pyglet-doc: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/8947453/com/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.1-1.1.i586.rpm.html What should we do in Fedora? Regarding your question about the formats, I think that they are accessed via AVbin (http://pyglet.org/), which uses ffmpeg: http://code.google.com/p/avbin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyglet But this is optional. pyglet just has a script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/media/avbin.py for accessing AVbin if it is installed on the system. This is nice, because it leaves the codecs out of the package. But sure, in case we go on, we need to be certain that everything problematic is really out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:04:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301604.m9UG4tr7011077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #3 from seth vidal 2008-10-30 12:04:54 EDT --- Uploaded a new spec, same location. Uploaded a new srpm. Not putting the frelling changelog versions on so that one can go hang itself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301608.m9UG8tjt012315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-30 12:08:54 EDT --- Rawhide built, others are on their way. Thanks again! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=912048 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:08:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466906] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-SetID - Provides api for correctly changing user identity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301608.m9UG87rV012223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466906 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav Suchy 2008-10-30 12:08:07 EDT --- Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID-1.5.6-1.f10.src.rpm SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-NOCpulse-SetID/perl-NOCpulse-SetID.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:12:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301612.m9UGCcd5013409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2008-10-30 12:12:37 EDT --- Please do not kill the *.la files except there's a real way to solve the issue which otherwise would show up as in bug #185237; I'm the reporter of that bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:24:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301624.m9UGOLKi015404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-30 12:24:20 EDT --- It has all the hallmarks of a gnulib problem. Probably the simplest thing to try is to update to the latest version of gnulib inside that package, which is explained here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/gnulib.html#Simple-update (you'll almost certainly want to read the earlier sections in that manual if you are not familiar with gnulib). BTW, we have a mailing list which might be a better place to discuss this: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mingw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:24:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466147] Review Request:fedora-ksplice - Script Collection for Using KSplice on Fedora Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301624.m9UGOtZq015437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466147 --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2008-10-30 12:24:54 EDT --- New upstream release: Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/fedora-ksplice/fedora-ksplice-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:32:04 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468003] Review Request: QMTest - an automated software test execution tool. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301632.m9UGW4Tr000742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468003 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(seefeld at sympatico | |.ca) --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:32:03 EDT --- If there is any news please let me know it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:35:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301635.m9UGZr50017555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 12:35:52 EDT --- vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:37:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301637.m9UGbqGc002107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:38:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301638.m9UGcdLj002302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:38:38 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:40:46 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301640.m9UGekVm018451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:40:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:39:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301639.m9UGdlHu018039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 12:39:46 EDT --- I didn't know about bug #185237 and the related bugs until now. I remember the time ImageMagick broke 2 years ago but it was fixed so quick that I didn't even had to check bugzilla. Well, if it would break things it is better to keep the .la files. Does upstream know about this issue? Or is this a "feature" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:43:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468799] Review Request: perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor - Make your object constructors blow up on unknown attributes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301643.m9UGhuWt018863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468799 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2008-10-30 12:43:54 EDT --- Imported and built in devel. Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:46:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301646.m9UGk23O003958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:46:01 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:54:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301654.m9UGsT1E020420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(johnhford at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:54:28 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:55:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301655.m9UGtchF020832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(shamardin at gmail.c | |om) --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:55:36 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 16:56:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 12:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301656.m9UGuIQR005553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 12:56:17 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:04:43 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462251] Review Request: pymol - python molecular graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301704.m9UH4haQ006892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462251 --- Comment #49 from Tim Fenn 2008-10-30 13:04:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > > Now python-pmw has appeared in EPEL testing, but pymol is still missing.. There was a snag related to the .desktop file on EL, see: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02586.html it should appear soon in EL testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:10:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301710.m9UHAsuf008332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 13:10:53 EDT --- Leave the examples in place. Adding this to %setup silences rpmlint: %{__chmod} -x examples/*.py %{__chmod} -x examples/*/*.py %{__chmod} -x examples/*.png %{__chmod} -x examples/*/*/*.ico AVbin sounds good. But I don't see it in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:09:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301709.m9UH9jaq023405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-30 13:09:43 EDT --- I just wonder if it seems rational to build plugins for applications that cannot goes to fedora (let's name kino or kdenelive) ? At least I wonder if we lack libffmpeg support the program would still be usable ? And what about extending capabilities ? In my test case, the libavformat module failed to load : mlt_repository.c, mlt_repository_init: failed to dlopen /usr/lib64/mlt/libmltavformat.so Whereas the file seems present. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:14:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301714.m9UHE7Bt008616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 13:14:07 EDT --- tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:13:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301713.m9UHDJDK024309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 13:13:18 EDT --- I meant, I don't se ffmpeg in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:12:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301712.m9UHC00H024162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 13:12:00 EDT --- Oh, never mind, it's in pyglet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:14:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301714.m9UHE5Tq024372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 13:14:04 EDT --- tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc8.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc8.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:21:02 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301721.m9UHL20l025890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 13:21:01 EDT --- I do see it in rpmforge, though. Can pyglet function without ffmpeg? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:40:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301740.m9UHelXZ014112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 13:40:47 EDT --- wput-0.6.1-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wput-0.6.1-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:48:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301748.m9UHmgPt015228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 13:48:42 EDT --- ifstat-1.1-8.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ifstat-1.1-8.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:49:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:49:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301749.m9UHnVRT015327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-30 13:49:30 EDT --- I'm not going to review this, but I thought I would offer some comments: - Your spec link appears to be incorrect. ;) - Is this based on the upstream spec? I would suggest you just start over with a clean new spec and match it to fedora guidelines, as the upstream spec has too many horrors to list in it. - This spec seems to suffer many of the same issues as the last webmin submission. See bug 184080 for the list of those. Please fix/address those issues. Additionally, some people there may wish to assist you in getting this in shape. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:49:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301749.m9UHnZfJ030669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 13:49:32 EDT --- pyglet does a lot of things, including graphics, by using OpenGL. It is similar to pygame. ffmpeg is available at livna, rpmforge, ATrpms, freshrpms. ffmpeg is also the base of mplayer and vlc. It decodes almost any audio/video format, and depends on packages Fedora cannot ship (lame, xvid, a52dec, etc.). pyglet can optionally use AVbin (an external program, not included, of course) to access ffmpeg. But AVbin/ffmepg is only necessary if one is interested in decoding mp3 or mpeg4, for instance. But most of the users do not need this functionality. pyglet is available in debian, suze, ubuntu and I think there should not be legal issues with it. I will remove the doc package. I agree with you, it is unnecessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:54:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301754.m9UHs0dj016260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 --- Comment #27 from Dan Dennedy 2008-10-30 13:53:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > I just wonder if it seems rational to build plugins for applications that > cannot goes to fedora (let's name kino or kdenelive) ? Do you refer to Kino and kdenlive the applications or to the MLT modules named kino and kdenlive? Kino does not use MLT, but kdenlive requires it. The MLT kino module simply contains Kino's DV AVI code. The MLT kdenlive module does not contain anything specific to kdenlive. Rather, it is more of a work area for the kdenlive lead developer to add his own effects to MLT. > At least I wonder if we lack libffmpeg support the program would still be > usable ? MLT is hardly usable at this time without FFmpeg libavformat and libavcodec. There are plans for a gstreamer module, but work has not yet begun. Without FFmpeg, MLT can still be useful for DV only work via libdv and the kino module. > And what about extending capabilities ? > In my test case, the libavformat module failed to load : > mlt_repository.c, mlt_repository_init: failed to dlopen > /usr/lib64/mlt/libmltavformat.so > Whereas the file seems present. Either there are unresolved symbols or some other build error preventing loading. Quite recently, FFmpeg starting requiring libbz2, and depending upon how you configured, that might be missing. You can do a 'ldd $(which ffmpeg)' and 'ldd libmltavformat.so' and compare them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 17:57:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301757.m9UHvPdS032294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Randall Berry 2008-10-30 13:57:23 EDT --- rpmlint: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Everything looks good. Successful build on F9 and Rawhide (i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:04:34 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301804.m9UI4YmL001210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 14:04:33 EDT --- So if ffmpeg is not present, it will still work on other, allowable media types, and if you then install ffmpeg from outside Fedora, it will then do those types? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:16:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301816.m9UIGnX9003938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 14:16:48 EDT --- Looks good to me. One note: $ gem contents ferret returns some files under %geminstdir/ext/, however they are missing because you intentionally deleted them. While I think removing files under %geminstdir/ext is preferable (because I don't think these files are needed to make ferret gem work, they are only needed to make ruby C extension), however currently I have no idea how we should treat the issue that gem reports that the files should have been installed. Currently for rubygem-zoom (I maintain, which also creates ruby C extension) I package all C sources into -doc subpackage.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:19:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301819.m9UIJDHl004334@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #11 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 14:19:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > So if ffmpeg is not present, it will still work on other, allowable media > types, and if you then install ffmpeg from outside Fedora, it will then do > those types? That is it. You can try some of the examples: python /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/noisy/noisy.py python /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/graphics.py python /usr/share/doc/python-pyglet-doc-1.1.2/examples/programming_guide/animation.py I updated the spec and srpm links (same location) for making rpmlint happy. The examples are still in the doc package for now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301823.m9UINZBT022835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 --- Comment #2 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-30 14:23:34 EDT --- Whoops. CORRECT spec link: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SPECS/webmin.spec It's very loosely based on the upstream SPEC. I gutted out tons of the original %pre/%post mess and made the %files section saner (so it actually includes every file or directory the package creates). I made a few changes to the spec based on suggestions in the linked bug. I'll rebuild the SRPM later (no rpmbuild on my webhost). Changes that are just in the spec, currently: * Vendor tag removed * License changed to GPL * The last few extraneous echos [to stdout] removed I left %clean as [ "%{buildroot}" != "/" ]. I don't see any harm in checking against a possibly catastrophic mistake. I have the backup of /etc/webmin in place still, although I'm copying it to /var/webmin instead of leaving it as a dotfile in /etc. Size-wise, /etc/webmin comes in at 1.1MB on my system. If that's too much space, there's probably no real harm in getting rid of the backup entirely and letting rawhide/new release testers fend for themselves. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:29:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301829.m9UITH6G024077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 14:29:16 EDT --- [limb at fawkes examples]$ python graphics.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "graphics.py", line 50, in from pyglet.gl import * File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/gl/__init__.py", line 507, in import pyglet.window File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/window/__init__.py", line 1682, in gl._create_shadow_window() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/gl/__init__.py", line 491, in _create_shadow_window _shadow_window = Window(width=1, height=1, visible=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/window/xlib/__init__.py", line 474, in __init__ super(XlibWindow, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pyglet/window/__init__.py", line 641, in __init__ raise NoSuchConfigException('No standard config is available.') pyglet.window.NoSuchConfigException: No standard config is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:41:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301841.m9UIf9di009079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 --- Comment #5 from Debarshi Ray 2008-10-30 14:41:08 EDT --- > May be use > sed -e '/^#!\//,1 d' -i %{buildroot}/%{python_sitearch}/ldtplib/ $ sed -i -e '1d' $FILE ... was enough enough. :-) Upstream has agreed to fix it in the next release. Spec: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/ldtp.spec SRPM: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/ldtp-1.3.0-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:40:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301840.m9UIeZWC008899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-30 14:40:33 EDT --- I guess --vendor="" should work ok. We should still get it into the guidelines so everyone does the same thing however. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:46:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301846.m9UIkRAI010176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-30 14:46:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:47:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:47:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301847.m9UIlPxq027898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-30 14:47:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:48:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225798] Merge Review: gimp-help In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301848.m9UImvXe028069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225798 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 14:48:57 EDT --- I reviewed this package. The following issues need to be addressed for compilance with the guidelines: * The files AUTHORS, ChangeLog, COPYING, HACKING, NEWS, README, TERMINOLOGY need to be listed under %doc * The package owns %dir %{_datadir}/gimp %dir %{_datadir}/gimp/%{gimpsubver} which are also owned by gimp. Note that the package Requires: gimp. The above ownerships need to be dropped. * %defattr(-,root,root,-) is preferred. * BuildRequires: libxml2 is not required since BuildRequires: libxslt will pull that up * Similarly BuildRequires: docbook-style-xsl is not required. It will be pulled up by other dependencies. Am I wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 18:59:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301859.m9UIxGSV012539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 19:17:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301917.m9UJHjCB016217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #13 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 15:17:44 EDT --- I changed the spec file. I added the required packages: Requires: alsa-lib Requires: gdk-pixbuf Requires: mesa-libGL Requires: mesa-libGLU Requires: openal Can you, please, try again? I think everything needed is there now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 19:20:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459878] Review Request: genome - Package for the Genome Project In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301920.m9UJKUYB016975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459878 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 15:20:29 EDT --- For -6: (still I just looked at your spec file) * Macros - For example /usr/share must be %{_datadir} https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros (In reply to comment #17) > (In reply to comment #15) > > * Virtual Provides must usually be EVR specific (Vitual Provides > > without EVR information caused upgrading path problem many > > times...) > > > > Fixed. - This means that "Provides: rubygem-genome-bootstrap" must usually be "Provides: rubygem-genome-bootstrap = %{version}-%{release}", for example. > > * "Requires: genome" is redundant when "Requires: gnome-lib" is > > present (currently, however see below) > > * I guess that the dependency between genome and genome-lib > > is opposite > It allows for faster dep-solving if Requires: genome is in the requires for a > package next to Requires: genome-lib, because the "new" deps won't have to be > looped through (the dep is already resolved during the first run in the loop) - What I mean here is that "genome" package should have "Requires: genome-lib" and genoe-lib subpackage should _not_ have "Requires: genome" (e.g. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/lzma/devel/lzma.spec?view=co ) > > * When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option > > to keep timestamps on installed files: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps > Fixed. - Not yet... (you should use -p option also for "cp" command) > > * The scripts related to SysVinit script are wrong at > > several points. > > Also some Requires(preun) or so are missing. > > Please refer to: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScripts#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Syntax > > > > Fixed. - Please recheck these. -6 srpm scriptlets for SysVInit scripts are still wrong. Example: -------------------------------------------------------- %preun bridge /sbin/chkconfig --del genome-bridge -------------------------------------------------------- * Note that when genome-bridge is to be upgraded, %preun of old genome-bridge is done _after_ newer genome-bridge is installed and all %post scripts in new genome-bridge is executed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Scriptlet_Ordering As the result, with this scriptlet when genome-bridge is upgraded chkconfig entry of gnome-bridge is completely deleted because of _old_ %preun script. (There are also some other mistakes in other scriptlets. Please recheck SysVInitScripts wiki) > > * Please make it sure that directories which are created when > > installing a package are correctly owned by the package. > > There are some directories which are not owned by any packages > > or when the package is installed: > > > I think I got this one nailed but I'd appreciate some verification. - Please check the following directories: ------------------------------------------------------- %{_datadir}/genome-replace-self/ ------------------------------------------------------- > > > * We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > Also on some subpackages %defattr is completely missing > > (please use rpmlint to detect this type of packagins error) > rpmlint does not say anything about missing defattr's - You can use rpmlint also for src.rpm (still complains) > > * Files under %_datadir/doc are automatically marked as %doc > I'm not sure what this means. I get what it means but I'm not sure what it > applies to as far as the package is concerned. - This means that "%doc" specification in "%doc %{_datadir}/doc/genome-dsl-%{version}" is redundant, for example. * macros in comments ------------------------------------------------------- #%files docs #%defattr(-,root,root,-) #%doc COPYING #%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/httpd/conf.d/genome-docs.conf #/%{_localstatedir}/www/genome/docs ------------------------------------------------------- - Well this is a bit dangerous because rpm tries to expand macros even in comments. In comments or %changelog, please use %% instead of % to prevent macros from being expanded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 19:37:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810301937.m9UJbSa3005403@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 15:37:26 EDT --- I already had all that installed. I rebuilt anyway, same issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:05:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302005.m9UK5Ava010365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077 Torsten Rausche changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(trausche at fedorapr | |oject.org) | --- Comment #16 from Torsten Rausche 2008-10-30 16:05:09 EDT --- I did a new release in the meantime. You see I maintain the package -- as I actively use it. I just have a problem with the time I have to spend with reviewing other packages. There is an enormous list of points to check for which i needed hours for my own package. How much time will it cost then to do the same with a foreign package? Are there any helpful tools I missed? Do I have to check every single point in that pre-reviews to get them honored? How many pre-reviews will I have to do? I submitted this package because I created it for myself anyway and thought it could be useful for other people too. I am not doing it to polish my ego by getting an elite Fedora packager at any cost. Therefore I will only invest as much time in this process as is pleasing to me. --------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec SRPM URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Oct 11 2008 Torsten Rausche - 2.8.1-1 - New bugfix release - Include the (experimental) Teletext grabber - Require Perl for the Teletext grabber -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:15:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459989] Review Request: gnurobots - A robot programming game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302015.m9UKFE5R026502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459989 --- Comment #10 from vivek shah 2008-10-30 16:15:13 EDT --- Fixed the CFALGS issue by modifying the configure.ac shipped as suggested earlier and the absence of -Werror is not going to cause a problem I believe. Removed the obsolete BuildRequires and also added the missing Unowned directories. SPEC URL : http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnurobots.spec SRPM URL : http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnurobots-1.2.0-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:20:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302020.m9UKKMiT012917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #15 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 16:20:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I already had all that installed. I rebuilt anyway, same issue. Weird, you should have seen a pink torus rotating on the screen. This example is running even on an old FC6 with python 2.4. These are the requirements: * Linux, with the following libraries (most recent distributions will have these in a default installation): * OpenGL and GLX * GDK 2.0 or later (required for loading images) * OpenAL or ALSA (required for playing audio) pyglet requires either: * Python 2.4 with ctypes installed * Python 2.5 It is like you did not have the GLX extension on your server. Can you check if you have GLX available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:20:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464047] Review Request for libprojectM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302020.m9UKKgUM012990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464047 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-30 16:20:40 EDT --- Well, as this is NEEDSPONSOR ticket and from Orcan's request (Orcan, thanks for your pre-remark) ! License - Well, this can be ignored for now but actually Parser.cpp looks like under GPLv2+ because of copy and paste mistake (perhaps...) Please ask upstream to fix the license clause on this file. * About Patch1 (perhaps CRLF issue) - Well, such "huge" patch is not desired (here I say "huge" because this patch changes the whole of the text file). This patch gives us the impression that you changed the whole of upstream ChangeLog by your some intention. For this case please use "sed" instead of creating patch to aviod creating such huge patch and to show that you actually used sed to fix CRLF issue and did not do anything. * cmake build log - For cmake please use --------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} VERBOSE=1 --------------------------------------------------------- to make build.log more verbose (so that we can check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored, for example). * pkgconfig .pc file - libprojectM.pc.in contains --------------------------------------------------------- 1 prefix=@CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX@ 2 exec_prefix=@CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX@ 3 libdir=@CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX@/lib --------------------------------------------------------- It looks that libdir is expanded as /usr/lib even on 64 bits architecture so this is perhaps wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:22:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302022.m9UKMUnd027733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-30 16:22:29 EDT --- How do I check that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:29:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302029.m9UKTn1A014379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2008-10-30 16:29:48 EDT --- I'll take this. Before I do a full review, I see a few problems that need to be corrected. First, RPM_OPT_FLAGS are not respected during compilation. Change the make invocation in the spec file to read: %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" Second, the source tar file includes all of the sources of cexcept, zlib, and libpng. This leads directly to the next two problems. Third, the program should be linked against -lz, and -lpng to pick up the latest and greatest security fixes, but isn't. This is required by the Packaging Guideliness. (See "Duplication of system libraries".) I realize that this package is shipping source for later versions of libpng and zlib than Fedora currently ships, but I don't see that as changing the situation. Fourth, there is no Fedora package of cexcept. It is a compile-time-only artifact, so that might be okay, but it has a different license, so I'm not sure. If you know of an official Fedora statement that this kind of thing is okay, please point me to it. Otherwise, you'll probably need to package cexcept first. Fifth, the license is not the same text as the zlib license. The intent seems to be the same, but I am not a lawyer. Please check with fedora-legal that this license can be called "zlib". Sixth, when I tried to compile with the system versions of zlib and libpng, I got this: pngcrush.c: In function ?main?: pngcrush.c:2891: error: ?chunk_name? undeclared (first use in this function) pngcrush.c:2891: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pngcrush.c:2891: error: for each function it appears in.) This appears to be a pngcrush bug. Starting on line 2821, there is an #if expression that is missing "|| !defined(PNG_sTER_SUPPORTED)". Please report this bug upstream. Finally, please consider whether ChangeLog.txt ought be included as a %doc file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:28:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302028.m9UKSC5l028685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 ZC Miao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from ZC Miao 2008-10-30 16:28:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: g2ipmsg Short Description: IP Messenger for GNOME 2 Owners: hellwolf Branches: F-9 InitialCC: hellwolf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:35:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302035.m9UKZjst030195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-30 16:35:44 EDT --- homestead-0.87-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/homestead-0.87-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:34:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:34:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302034.m9UKYXer029756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #17 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 16:34:32 EDT --- Just run glxinfo from glx-utils. You should see among other things (a lot of stuff) something like this: ------------------------------------ GLX version: 1.3 GLX extensions: GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_pbuffer, GLX_SGI_video_sync, GLX_SGI_swap_control, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_NV_float_buffer, GLX_ARB_fbconfig_float, GLX_ARB_get_proc_address --------------------------------------- You can also run glxgears (in fact, glx-utils only has these two programs): [cascavel:~] listrpm glx-utils-7.0.2-3.fc8.x86_64 /usr/bin/glxgears /usr/bin/glxinfo I am using an nvidia 7600 card (with the proprietary driver). I will only have access to a computer without the proprietary driver tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 20:48:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451189] Review Request: rancid - Really Awesome New Cisco confIg Differ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302048.m9UKm3bC017669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451189 ?ge Olai Johnsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(aage at thaumaturge. | |org) | --- Comment #20 from ?ge Olai Johnsen 2008-10-30 16:48:01 EDT --- Due to "alot of stuff to fix", I will not be able to do any other request/pre-review until next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:19:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302119.m9ULJjpb005030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #8 from David Carter 2008-10-30 17:19:44 EDT --- Whoops... a little too quick on the enter... the correct files are: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.4/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/0.8-0.4/arm4-0.8-0.4.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:17:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302117.m9ULHvf9004900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #7 from David Carter 2008-10-30 17:17:56 EDT --- Updated version based on the just released upstream version: Spec URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/arm4.spec SRPM URL: http://arm4.org/Downloads/arm4-0.8-0.1.fc9.beta2.src.rpm Description: An open source implementation of the Open Group's Application Response Measurement standard Version 4.0. This agent and daemon is capable of measuring transaction response times across multiple tiers and correlating them to determine the true source of application response problems. See http://www.arm4.org for more information. NOTE: This doesn't include any SE Linux support. That will be done as a follow on once this is in the system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:31:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302131.m9ULVFwE025065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #27 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-10-30 17:31:14 EDT --- If in ext/ is the ruby C extension files, would it be reasonable to package them in a -devel subpackage? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:37:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302137.m9ULbBwp025811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-30 17:37:11 EDT --- Worth noting that on x86_64 rawhide with intel video, these examples (noisy and graphics) segfault pretty explosively. Auditing the code, I noticed it has an S3TC implementation. This is patent encumbered and needs to be removed. Given that the code seems to rely on this pretty heavily, it looks like it might be a showstopper. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news here. You might consider maintaining it in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:50:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:50:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302150.m9ULoPR9009739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-30 17:50:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Spot, I expect this is an OK license (please suggest license tag text), but > would appreciate your review. > Matt, this isn't a software license... but this isn't exactly software, is it? (If it were on software, it would be non-free.) So, judging it as content, I have one big concern: // DMTF specifications and documents may be reproduced for uses // consistent with this purpose by members and non-members, // provided that correct attribution is given. The guidelines for content licensing are: Content must be: * freely distributable without restriction * in a format which is not patent encumbered The format is okay, but that content seems to apply a restriction to "freely redistributable". My translation is that it says that these files are "freely redistributable as long as you use them in a way that is involved with promoting enterprise and systems management and interoperability." This is really a use-case restriction, just the same as if it said "you may redistribute these files as long as you do not sell them." Is there any chance we can get the DMTF to permit unrestricted redistribution of these files? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:54:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302154.m9ULsaS2028386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 --- Comment #19 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 17:54:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Worth noting that on x86_64 rawhide with intel video, these examples (noisy and > graphics) segfault pretty explosively. > > Auditing the code, I noticed it has an S3TC implementation. This is patent > encumbered and needs to be removed. Given that the code seems to rely on this > pretty heavily, it looks like it might be a showstopper. > > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news here. You might consider maintaining it in > rpmfusion. C'est la vie ... I did not notice it used S3 Texture Compression. Anyway, it seems that it just run the graphics fine on nvidia cards. Game over. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:53:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302153.m9ULreEL010142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-30 17:53:39 EDT --- This is correct. That license text says that you cannot distribute it for profit, which would mean that someone putting the SRPM on a CD couldn't resel the CD to cover their costs because that file is in the original tarball, even if we patch it out or immediately delete it. I know it is a pain, but you must make a modified tarball that doesn't have any bits under non-commercial licenses. You should probably point this out to upstream and recommend that they pull this code out of their tarball, and offer it separately on their website instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 21:51:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469265] New: Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469265 Summary: Review Request: pax-utils - PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpm at greysector.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pax-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pax-utils-0.1.17-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: pax-utils is a small set of various PaX aware and related utilities for ELF binaries. It was written for ELF Q/A on Gentoo systems but can be used on any distro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:05:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302205.m9UM5TAe012189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |roma at lcg.ufrj.br Bug 452108 depends on bug 452107, which changed state. Bug 452107 Summary: Review Request: cfdg - Context Free Design Grammar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452107 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 18:05:28 EDT --- There is no "ready" tarball here: http://impulzus.com/~tchibo/ I downloaded a Zip file, which name has 8 characters, and change each time. Anyway, rpmlint is clean, and I built it locally on F8 x86_64, after rebuilding its dependency (cfdg). It also builds for F9 i386 with mock. I loaded several examples from cfdg, and rendered the images, although a few files did not succeed. There is also in the source an example called welcome.cfdg which could go to the documentation. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NA: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, OK: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK: Each package must have a %clean section. OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Summary: All clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:25:19 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302225.m9UMPJSq001712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:25:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - JRosetta provides a common base for graphical component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302225.m9UMP9u3001594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rpm at greysector.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpm at greysector.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:22:29 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302222.m9UMMTGb000931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.14-6 Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Ville Skytt? 2008-10-30 18:22:27 EDT --- Ok, looks good to me now, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:29:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454018] Review Request: tcl-tkpng - Tcl/Tk support for PNG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302229.m9UMTbnd016353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454018 jebba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |moe at blagblagblag.org --- Comment #1 from jebba 2008-10-30 18:29:36 EDT --- For building on my f9-ish system it needs: BuildRequires: zlib-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:29:09 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302229.m9UMT9LC016274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 John F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(johnhford at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from John F 2008-10-30 18:29:08 EDT --- Hi Mamoru, I am just in the middle of midterms right now. Thanks for your recomendations! I will be fixing the package on Nov 1, 2008 if all goes to plan Thanks again! John -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:46:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302246.m9UMkSfW019302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 David Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dcarter at entertain-me.com --- Comment #1 from David Carter 2008-10-30 18:46:27 EDT --- This is a sample review only, as I'm not currently sponsored. $ rpmlint -i python-foolscap-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm python-foolscap.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 18) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint -i python-foolscap-0.3.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I don't think the mixed format should prohibit a release, but it should be fixed before any subsequent releases. Package meets name guidelines, as does the .spec file. Spec file Changelog is OK. License is OK, build fine on both i386 and x86_64. Nice and simple :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:47:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302247.m9UMlsuX005722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #9 from David Carter 2008-10-30 18:47:53 EDT --- Practice reviewed new package python-foolscap bug number 462535 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 22:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302253.m9UMrbIL020502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-30 18:53:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > It is not clear for me if we should keep > > _yafrayinterface.so and _yafqt.so > > in blender's scripts directory or in %{_libdir}/blender, as > Jochen suggested. Either way is fine for me. The Shared Object are architecture dependent, thus needs to be in %{_libdir}/blender (which will ends in the blender sub-package) But /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so (and probably /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so also needs to be in the blender sub-pacakge. I don't think it is necessary to run ldconfig in %post/%postun for the blender sub packages, as theses SO are meant to be dlopened. (only needed for by /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so which yafaray-xml links to). Please check permissions for _yafqt.so and _yafrayinterface.so because they are meant to be executable (if not they won't be stripped). Please use Source0: instead of Source: (there is some side-effects without versioned source). The source archives cannot be downloaded over the internet. You need to create a yafaray-snapshot.sh that will repackage such archtive for you. gcc-c++ is already in the buildroot. it have to be removed. %{SOURCE1} is manually extracted. You have to move this task in %prep using : %setup -q -n %{name} %setup -q -D -T -a 1 -n %{name} If you need to copy files that are not installed. Please use cp -p. That will prevent to change the timestamps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 23:10:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302310.m9UNASSi022827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #19 from Uwe Kubosch 2008-10-30 19:10:27 EDT --- I have talked to the upstream project, and renaming the upstream project seems unlikely, but they encourage us to rename our package if it makes a positive difference. I'll keep the name until there is a Fuse naming guideline. OK? Regarding the ExcludeArch's I got this from upstream: "Yes, zfs-fuse doesn't have PPC and PPC64 implementations for atomic instructions, hence it won't build on those architectures. It will only build on x86, x86-64 and sparc64 at the moment." I'll look at removing the contrib init file. But really, the package is good to go? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Oct 30 23:53:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810302353.m9UNrUoL028911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-30 19:53:28 EDT --- @Charles review is nearly done here / will you finish ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 00:11:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310011.m9V0Bafn018158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-30 20:11:35 EDT --- I was afraid of the use-case restriction aspect. I'll consult with DMTF, but unlikely this can be changed easily. Note: existing tog-pegasus package includes these schemas with exactly this same text. I'd consider the schemas to be code myself, much like C headers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 00:16:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310016.m9V0GQho018852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-30 20:16:25 EDT --- Yes it is a mixture of both. Most probably, since both are "good" licenses this package can go with Fedora. To make sure and to ask about naming the license, please send an email to the Fedora Legal mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 00:21:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310021.m9V0Llsa000787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch 2008-10-30 20:21:46 EDT --- Example text from one of the files in here: uint32 VerifyOKToApplyToCollection ( [IN, Description ( "The Collection of ManagedSystemElements that is being " "verified.")] CIM_CollectionOfMSEs REF Collection, [IN, Description ( "TimeToApply can be either a specific time or a time " "interval.")] datetime TimeToApply, [IN, Description ( "The required completion time for the method.")] datetime MustBeCompletedBy, [IN ( false ), OUT, Description ( "A string array that lists the keys of the " "ManagedSystemElements to which the Setting cannot be " "applied.")] string CanNotApply[]); whihc looks like code to me. :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 00:33:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310033.m9V0XNLb002223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #4 from Charles R. Anderson 2008-10-30 20:33:22 EDT --- I would like to, but I'm not sponsored yet :-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 00:43:52 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456182] Review Request: rssh - Restricted shell for use with OpenSSH, allowing only scp and/or sftp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310043.m9V0hqCi003653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456182 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ianweller at gmail.com --- Comment #25 from Ian Weller 2008-10-30 20:43:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > So does this make the presence of /sbin/nologin in /etc/shells a problem? > > Rahul, can you please revert the change to add rssh to /etc/shells? Rahul asked fedora-devel-list if someone could do this for him and I went ahead. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=913061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 01:04:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310104.m9V14g1E006594@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 --- Comment #3 from Andy Theuninck 2008-10-30 21:04:41 EDT --- New SRPM build: http://gohanman.com/rpm/Fedora9/SRPMS/webmin-1.430-2.fc9.src.rpm At this point, rpmlint only has two complaints: * using cp in %pre (to back up /etc/webmin) * using chmod in %post (to make the install log root-only readable) Neither of those actions seems terribly "dangerous" to me, to be honest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 01:04:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:04:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] New: Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Summary: Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hayden.james at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix.spec SRPM URL: http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/quickfix-1.12.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: QuickFIX is a full-featured open source FIX engine, currently compatible with the FIX 4.0-4.4 spec. It runs on Windows, Linux, Solaris, FreeBSD and Mac OS X. API's are available for C++, Java, .NET, Python and Ruby. This is my first package submittal to Fedora/RedHat and hence I'll need a package sponser. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 01:08:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310108.m9V18tOu025843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 Hayden James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: QuickFIX - |FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review |development library for FIX |Request: QuickFIX - |based applications |development library for FIX | |based applications -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 01:51:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] New: Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Summary: Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ianweller at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/fedora-business-cards/0.2.1-1/fedora-business-cards.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/fedora-business-cards/0.2.1-1/fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: fedora-business-cards is a tool written in Python to generate business cards for Fedora Project contributors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310219.m9V2JZpp018801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #20 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-30 22:19:34 EDT --- If I move _yafrayinterface.so and _yafqt.so to %{_libdir}/blender, I will have to make symbolic links to %{_datadir}/blender/scripts. This is because these symbolic links must appear in ~/.blender/scripts, so yafrayinterface.py can load (import) them. The spec will have something like this: pushd %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/blender/scripts ln -s ../../../%{_lib}/_yafqt.so . ln -s ../../../%{_lib}/_yafrayinterface.so . popd The script yafaray-snapshot.sh is just for preparing the tarballi, right? I mean, it will not download the source via svn. This is the new spec file (I tested it): http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/yafaray.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:35:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310235.m9V2ZIxS022119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:37:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310237.m9V2bgdm008693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jonstanley at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jon Stanley 2008-10-30 22:37:41 EDT --- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK- Sources match upstream md5sum: ee675049982acdc520530020d2b75f0d fedora-business-cards-0.2.1.tar.gz ee675049982acdc520530020d2b75f0d build/SOURCES/fedora-business-cards-0.2.1.tar.gz N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be. OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage. N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage. N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A - .la files are removed. N/A - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge review APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:40:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:40:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310240.m9V2eSBO023019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|jonstanley at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2008-10-30 22:40:28 EDT --- Thanks, Jon. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-business-cards Short Description: A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards Owners: ianweller Branches: F-9 F-10 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 02:41:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310241.m9V2fUtr009478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 03:07:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310307.m9V37l8E013431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #24 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-30 23:07:46 EDT --- New URLs: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-5.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 03:29:51 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310329.m9V3Tp8N016483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #4 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-30 23:29:50 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 04:07:36 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469291] New: Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469291 Summary: Review Request: uml_utilities - Utilities for user-mode linux kernel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul at xelerance.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.openswan.org/uml_utilities/uml_utilities-20060622-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains the utilities for user-mode linux for networking, COW, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 04:31:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310431.m9V4Vw8U026318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) | --- Comment #7 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-10-31 00:31:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ping? I am out of town and will work on this bug after I am come back. Please give me few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 04:41:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 00:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310441.m9V4fbIe009923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Soumya Kanti Chakraborty changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(soumya at dgplug.org | |) | --- Comment #15 from Soumya Kanti Chakraborty 2008-10-31 00:41:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > ping? I am out of town and will work on this bug after I am come back. Please give me few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 05:56:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 01:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462813] Review Request: ldtp - Desktop testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310556.m9V5uSTj006661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462813 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-31 01:56:27 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 You need to build it after above one gets imported and build. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 07:04:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310704.m9V74wrA030312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |182235 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |orcanbahri at yahoo.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-31 03:04:57 EDT --- Other than the license issue a few other things need to be sorted out: * Although it is an almost obsolete field I think the Group should be Applications/Multimedia ? You can do a make all to build pngcomp in addition to pngnq and then package it together :) (Don't forget to include the other README file if you do this) * We recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * It would be nice if you briefly explain in the SPEC file what the patches do. Did you submit them upstream (especially the getopt patch)? If so, please provide the links (in the SPEC file) to their tracking system. * Package does not honor Fedora specific compilation flags. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- Also, let's keep FE-Legal blocked until the license issue is solved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 08:14:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310814.m9V8EBOO027289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #10 from Jan Safranek 2008-10-31 04:14:09 EDT --- Great, thanks a lot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 08:12:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310812.m9V8CL2U027101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-31 04:12:19 EDT --- Umm.... usually a subpackage named "-devel" usually contains some header files or so and means that other applications will make use of the files in the -devel rpm. However for this package files under ext/ directory are not meant to be used from other packages (no header files installed), just to create ferret C extension. Maybe: - to create -csource subpackage? (however if you want to name this as "-devel" I won't oppose it) - to simply remove these files as before and ignore inconsistency with gem report (note: other maintainer of rubygem rpms containing C extension simply do this). For now I won't complain whatever you choice Perhaps when I can take some time I have to write some draft about how to package rubygem including C extension... (I hope that I can work on this this weekend), however I don't think this should block this review request for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 08:59:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469273] Review Request: QuickFIX - development library for FIX based applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310859.m9V8xFS0017904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 Summary|FE-NEEDSPONSOR Review |Review Request: QuickFIX - |Request: QuickFIX - |development library for FIX |development library for FIX |based applications |based applications | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 09:06:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310906.m9V966kD019553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #21 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 05:06:05 EDT --- #!/bin/sh # # Repackages a snapshtot, removing any .svn # directory. # # Input: directory # Output: tarball (directory.tar.gz) # # Usage: yafaray-snapshot.sh yafaray if [[ $# < 1 ]]; then echo "yafaray-snapshot.sh dir" exit 0; fi DIR="$1" find "$DIR" -name .svn -print0 | xargs -0 rm -rf tar -zcvf "$DIR".tar.gz ./"$DIR" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 09:12:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310912.m9V9ClqP020616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 Denis Leroy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |denis at poolshark.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #20 from Denis Leroy 2008-10-31 05:12:45 EDT --- I'll do the formal review within the next couple of days. The package will be officially reviewed and accepted when I set the "fedora-review" flag to "+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 09:25:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469317] New: Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469317 Summary: Review request: lynis - Security and system auditing tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Lynis is a security and system auditing tool. It scans a system on the most interesting parts useful for audits, like: - Security enhancements - Logging and auditing options - Banner identification - Software availability SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/lynis-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/lynis.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 09:50:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810310950.m9V9oVDC028692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-31 05:50:30 EDT --- You should be able to "also" download from svn. Take a look on this sample: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/dirac/FC-5/dirac-snapshot.sh?view=markup It would be better for the tarball to have a date (not only versioned). @Jochen using a ~/.blender/script directory should be avoided. we need to use a dual system directory with %{_libdir}/blender/ and %{_datadir}/blender/scripts. Any chances that this kind of improvements can be thought with blender upstream? Everything that use users setting against system availability for libraries should be avoided. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:10:47 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311010.m9VAAlUh018190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 --- Comment #3 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-31 06:10:46 EDT --- Ok, I would like to get that fixed upstream. I sent mail to the maintainer with you in cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:08:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311008.m9VA8uGR031837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #11 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 06:08:55 EDT --- No reply so far. Mail was sent to jll at skynet.be, found in tarball. Tried again with other email address now: jll at soundobjectlogic.com, from cpan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:23:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311023.m9VANbP3020317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:23:36 EDT --- ifstat-1.1-8.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ifstat'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9312 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQtsm021950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:26:53 EDT --- homestead-0.87-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466974] Review Request: vdr-remote - Extended remote control plugin for VDR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQblQ021843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466974 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:26:36 EDT --- vdr-remote-0.4.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQPlW021770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:26:24 EDT --- tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429882] Review Request: python-Levenshtein - Levenshtein distance measurement library in C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQKGO021733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429882 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:26:18 EDT --- python-Levenshtein-0.10.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459924] Review Request: homestead - 3D real-time network visualiser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQxiW022015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459924 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:28 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQSwD021805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:26:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468633] Review Request: wput - A utility for uploading files or whole directories to remote ftp-servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311026.m9VAQoJ1021889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468633 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:26:49 EDT --- wput-0.6.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wput'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9330 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:27:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454019] Review Request: tcl-tktreectrl - Multi-column hierarchical listbox widget for Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311027.m9VARHar003601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454019 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 06:27:16 EDT --- tcl-tktreectrl-2.2.8-1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:35:54 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469329] New: Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 Summary: Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rakesh.pandit at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description: Nebula is an intrusion signature generator. It can help securing a network by automatically calculating filter rules from attack traces. In a common setup nebula runs as a daemon and receives attacks from honeypots. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/nebula.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/nebula-0.2.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:37:38 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311037.m9VAbcnM024069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-31 06:37:37 EDT --- I've just received few advices from #blendercoders I think we shouldn't duplicate code from how python module, and 'try to' consider yafaray blender dso and python script as usual python modules... (using python-site-arch directory for arch dependant code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:40:40 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467175] Review Request: perl-Set-Object - Set of objects and strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311040.m9VAeelI006103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #12 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 06:40:39 EDT --- Hmm, bounces: : This address no longer accepts mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:48:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:48:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311048.m9VAm1hU025901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #1 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala 2008-10-31 06:48:00 EDT --- Ok, so here are some things which would be nice to have: 1) URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nebula/ I prefer: URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/%{name} 2) ./configure --prefix=/ --libdir=%{_libdir} What is wrong with : %configure ? 3) make should be replaced by make %{?_smp_mflags} rpmlint is mainly silent apart from the invalid license warning. Also i am not sure if putting binaries in /bin is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 10:52:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311052.m9VAqntO008195@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #3 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-31 06:52:48 EDT --- for windows compile it's generate an error since rpl_optarg and rpl_optind notdefine anywhere in the source (and it's true). so it'be useful to fix it eg. the patch bellow (i already report it the upstream gettext to): --- ./gettext-tools/woe32dll/gettextlib-exports.c.lfarkas 2008-10-31 11:42:38.000000000 +0100 +++ ./gettext-tools/woe32dll/gettextlib-exports.c 2008-10-31 11:43:29.000000000 +0100 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ VARIABLE(gl_array_list_implementation) VARIABLE(gl_linkedhash_list_implementation) VARIABLE(program_name) -VARIABLE(rpl_optarg) -VARIABLE(rpl_optind) +/*VARIABLE(rpl_optarg) +VARIABLE(rpl_optind)*/ VARIABLE(simple_backup_suffix) VARIABLE(styled_ostream_typeinfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:05:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:05:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311105.m9VB5OJE010544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #2 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 07:05:23 EDT --- cexcept licence text --------------- cut here --------------- Copyright (c) 2000-2008 Adam M. Costello and Cosmin Truta. This software may be modified only if its author and version information is updated accurately, and may be redistributed only if accompanied by this unaltered notice. Subject to those restrictions, permission is granted to anyone to do anything with this software. The copyright holders make no guarantees regarding this software, and are not responsible for any damage resulting from its use. --------------- cut here --------------- It's just a header file, defining a few macros which play tricks with setjmp and longjmp. ~10k size, 80% of that being documentation in comments. Making that a package of its own looks like overkill to me, especially as there is no shared library or similar which can be shared at runtime ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:09:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311109.m9VB9ZVW029601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #4 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 07:09:34 EDT --- Uploaded updated package (release 2) to the same location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:06:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311106.m9VB6VeB029286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #3 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 07:06:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=322038) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=322038) pngcrunch license text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:11:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311111.m9VBBK3D011566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Gerd Hoffmann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:17:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311117.m9VBH19I031239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 --- Comment #4 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 07:17:00 EDT --- Uploaded new package release to the same location. Wrote email to fedora-legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:18:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311118.m9VBIDZI012665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 07:18:12 EDT --- This still looks like a bug in gnulib to me ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:18:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311118.m9VBICXC012632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Marco Pesenti Gritti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpg at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marco Pesenti Gritti 2008-10-31 07:18:11 EDT --- Could you try to get the shebang removal upstream? Otherwise I can do so next week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 11:56:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468298] Review Request: python-pygle - A cross-platform windowing and multimedia library for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311156.m9VBuUET019476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468298 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 07:56:29 EDT --- Indeed. And so it goes. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:19:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463922] Review Request: ifstat - Interface statistics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311219.m9VCJZWE010193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463922 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:20:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311220.m9VCKw9h010886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-31 08:20:57 EDT --- FYI, the build also fails on Fedora 9, so EPEL is a red herring. The trigger appears to be the upgrde of mingw-runtime from 3.14 to 3.15.1. In the new runtime release they completely re-implemented the getopt module. If you compare the configure output for 'mingw-gettext' build when run against runtime 3.14 vs 3.15.1 there is an interesting difference When built against 3.15.1 (which fails) checking getopt.h usability... yes checking getopt.h presence... yes checking for getopt.h... yes checking for getopt_long_only... yes checking whether optreset is declared... no checking for working GNU getopt function... checking whether getopt_clip is declared... no yes When built against 3.14 (which works) checking getopt.h usability... yes checking getopt.h presence... yes checking for getopt.h... yes checking for getopt_long_only... no So, with the old mingw runtime, gettext's gnulib was providing a complete replacement for getopt_long_only, and related functions. When built with new runtime its only providing a replacement for certain bits, and this seems to break. Wierdly, gettext appears to contain patches ontop of standard gnulib in a 'gnulib-local' directory. This one in particular is suspicious looking gnulib-local/lib/getopt.in.h.diff since it marks various things DLL exports. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:35:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:35:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469189] Review Request: system-autodeath - Automatically disable system default route on a specific date. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311235.m9VCZdeF028053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469189 --- Comment #4 from Tim Lauridsen 2008-10-31 08:35:38 EDT --- # rpmlint Download/system-autodeath-0.2-1.src.rpm system-autodeath.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog system-autodeath.src: W: strange-permission system-autodeath.spec 0600 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These should be OK. # rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/system-autodeath-0.2-1.noarch.rpm system-autodeath.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/sysconfig/system-autodeath.conf system-autodeath.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog /etc/sysconfig/system-autodeath.conf should be a config file in the %files section (. not checked, * = ok, X = not OK) MUST: * Package is matching naming guidelines. * spec file in named %{name}.spec * it is legal for Fedora to distribute this * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible have the right good license shortname : GPLv2+ * License file must be in %doc (it it exists) * Spec file is written in American English * Spec file is legible. * Sources match upstream. MD5SUM: ea889c8a377cac44361576f6112f2868 /home/tim/rpmbuild/SOURCES/system-autodeath-0.2.tar.gz ea889c8a377cac44361576f6112f2868 /home/tim/Download/system-autodeath-0.2.tar.gz * summary and description fine * correct buildroot X %{?dist} is used * license text included in package and marked with %doc * package meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/) * changelog format fine * Packager/Vendor/Distribution/Copyright tags not used * Summary tag does not end in a period * Package compiles and build into RPM's on : i386 etc. * no Exclude Arch * BuildRequires for all build requerements (- the ones on the Exception list) * no locales * no shared libs * Package own all created directories. * No duplicate files in %files * Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line * Package has a %clean with a rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT * consistently use of macros * Package contains code or or permissable content. * No large documentation * files in %doc dont affect runtime. * no header files * no static libs * package has no pkgconfig (.pc) files * no -devel subpackage * no ..la libtool archives * not a gui application * package don't own files and dirs owned by other packages. * %install starts with an rm -rf %{buildroot} * rpm package filenames is in valid UTF-8. * no Rpath * no config files * no %makeinstall used * no Requires(pre,post) Problems. %{?dist} is missing from release tag. /etc/sysconfig/system-autodeath.conf should be a config file in the %files section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:41:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311241.m9VCfGwq029122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #6 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-31 08:41:14 EDT --- so what's your conclusion? should be use 3.14 or 3.15 with my patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:45:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311245.m9VCjdNe016126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 08:45:38 EDT --- Well we should always try to use the new version. Does Dan's analysis in comment 5 lead us to believe it's a problem in gnulib or in gettext? (or in runtime)? I started a thread on the gnulib mailing list: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-10/threads.html (It hasn't appeared in their archives as I write this, but will be at the link above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:46:12 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465943] Review Request: NetworkManager-openconnect - NetworkManager VPN integration for openconnect In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311246.m9VCkCAj016247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465943 --- Comment #3 from David Woodhouse 2008-10-31 08:46:10 EDT --- Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/NetworkManager-openconnect-0.96-1.fc9.src.rpm Updated to run the VPN client itself as a non-root user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:51:50 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311251.m9VCpoT4031385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 08:51:49 EDT --- Thanks. If you intend this review to be official, you need to also set the status from NEW to ASSIGNED, assign it from nobody to your self, and set the review flag to ?. Then, when approved, set the review flag to + and indicate your approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:50:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311250.m9VCojkk031085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Berrange 2008-10-31 08:50:44 EDT --- This isn't a gnulib bug - gnulib is actually doing the right thing here. The trouble is that gettext has a hardcoded list of symbols for mingw, and its assuming that optind & optarg are to be included, regardless of whether gnulib actually built them. So removing those two exports from gettext-tools/woe32dll/gettextlib-exports.c is correct in context of mingw-runtime 3.15.1 and fine for Fedora's needs Ideally upstream gettext would conditionally generate that exports file according to what gnulib actually built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:53:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311253.m9VCrdJi017806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #9 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-31 08:53:37 EDT --- this means please apply my patch or something similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 12:53:37 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 08:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311253.m9VCrbY3031819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #5 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-31 08:53:36 EDT --- The last problem is licence. As written on https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg02697.html licence should be MIT. Otherwise no problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:00:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311300.m9VD07TK019356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Till Maas 2008-10-31 09:00:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: aircrack-ng New Branches: F-10 Owners: till -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:05:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469329] Review Request: nebula - An intrusion signature generator (Security tool) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311305.m9VD5BlO002013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469329 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2008-10-31 09:05:10 EDT --- 1. For consistency - done 2. the build system uses -Werror and recommended %{configure} does produce some warnings which are converted to errors. So, to avoid messing with build system I have used ./configure. I have reported maintainer about different warnings with CFLAGS from %{configure} 3. done Updated: SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/nebula.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/nebula-0.2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:08:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468765] Review Request: hydrogen-drumkits - Additional DrumKits for Hydrogen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311308.m9VD8mWh020955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468765 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-31 09:08:47 EDT --- The Green license is free, as long as clause VI isn't invoked (which it is not here). The Yellow license isn't (but you're not using it). I've added the Green license to the table as "Green OpenMusic", so you need to adjust your license tag to: License: GPLv2+ and Green OpenMusic Lifting FE-Legal, thanks for your due diligence here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:08:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311308.m9VD8jcl002742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-31 09:08:44 EDT --- Source0 is uncorrect Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Correct is Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/lgames/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:13:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311313.m9VDD1Fw021844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-31 09:13:00 EDT --- Cexcept is "Copyright Only". pngcrush is a verbose zlib variant, but the restrictions are the same, so it is fine to call it "zlib". Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:20:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311320.m9VDKiw9023658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-31 09:20:43 EDT --- Three licenses in play here (in order) BSD with advertising MIT BSD So, License: BSD with advertising and MIT and BSD Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:21:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311321.m9VDLFfm023864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:40:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311340.m9VDeOMo027469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-31 09:40:23 EDT --- It looks like code, but does it get compiled or executed? If it is code, it is definitely non-free. It could just be a disgusting syntax for the schema. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:37:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:37:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454018] Review Request: tcl-tkpng - Tcl/Tk support for PNG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311337.m9VDbtKX026800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454018 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-10-31 09:37:55 EDT --- New SRPM: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tkpng-0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm New SPEC: http://auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/coccinella/tcl-tkpng.spec Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=913492 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:39:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311339.m9VDdKNP026965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:40:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311340.m9VDe1AW008493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:38:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311338.m9VDct8S008391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-31 09:38:54 EDT --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf-1.0.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm * Wed Oct 31 2008 Paul Wouters - 1.0.1.0-4 - Changed license from BSD to MIT Thanks for the review Adam! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:45:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:45:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466301] Review Request: ario - Music Player Daemon Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311345.m9VDjVMh028884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466301 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-31 09:45:30 EDT --- Okay, thank you for reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:45:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:45:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311345.m9VDjj1S028931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-31 09:45:44 EDT --- Okay, thank you for reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:45:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311345.m9VDjGLe028630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #7 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-31 09:45:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnsperf Short Description: Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:44:27 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311344.m9VDiRX2028086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 --- Comment #18 from Paul Wouters 2008-10-31 09:44:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unbound Short Description: Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:52:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311352.m9VDqvLO030411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2008-10-31 09:52:55 EDT --- Okay, thank you for reply. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:52:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311352.m9VDqKMD030319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #10 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-31 09:52:18 EDT --- please remove the: Provides: mingw-binutils = %{version} Obsoletes: mingw-binutils < 2.18.50_20080109_2-8 lines from this spec file. until these mingw32 packages getting stable i'd like to use old mingw-binutils (which deleted with this lines). and as none of the other mingw32-* packages use this Provides/Obsoletes why this package should have to be exception? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:56:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311356.m9VDuGbt012359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 09:56:15 EDT --- Done: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel?cs=f2e0ba46438e Note that you will need the latest mingw32-termcap too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:57:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311357.m9VDv7rg031583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |467398 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:57:06 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311357.m9VDv678031557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |467329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:58:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467329] Review Request: mingw32-termcap - MinGW terminal feature database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311358.m9VDwAr2012668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467329 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 09:58:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=06642864def98e59c07661b91e0b58d0b1b25723;path=/termcap/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-termcap-1.3.1-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 13:59:01 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467398] Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311359.m9VDx1kx012795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 09:59:00 EDT --- Spec URL: http://hg.et.redhat.com/misc/fedora-mingw--devel/?cmd=manifest;manifest=06642864def98e59c07661b91e0b58d0b1b25723;path=/gettext/ SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/mingw/fedora-9/src/SRPMS/mingw32-gettext-0.17-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:08:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311408.m9VE8DFW001412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:09:44 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311409.m9VE9iDd015412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 10:09:43 EDT --- What's not stable about this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:08:21 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311408.m9VE8LB5015205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:08:05 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311408.m9VE855q015155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 --- Comment #8 from Adam Tkac 2008-10-31 10:08:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Spec URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf.spec > SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.xelerance.com/dnsperf/dnsperf-1.0.1.0-4.fc9.src.rpm > > > * Wed Oct 31 2008 Paul Wouters - 1.0.1.0-4 > - Changed license from BSD to MIT > > Thanks for the review Adam! No problem ;) Btw you should not set fedora-review to + by yourself :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:07:24 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311407.m9VE7Oiv014978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 Lev Shamardin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(shamardin at gmail.c | |om) | --- Comment #23 from Lev Shamardin 2008-10-31 10:07:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Some notes for 2.0.2-1: > > A. %description stage > * License > - is actually BSD (also see CHANGES.txt) > Perhaps you want to change the license of .pc.in > file. > > * (Build)Requires > * For -devel subpackage > - "Requires: protobuf" is redundant because protobuf-compiler > already requires protobuf. Fixed this. > > * For -python subpackage > - Would you explain why -python subpackage has "Requires > python-setuptools"? > This was a typo. Fixed. > ------------------------------------------------------ > Additional remark about python subpackage: > The -python subpackage should not depend on the base package or any other > packages because it is a pure python implementation. > ------------------------------------------------------ > - Well, for technical discussion, does this mean that there will > be no problem even if the installed version of protobuf and > protobuf-python differ? (if you don't write Requires this > can happen). > This discussion can be applied for -java subpackage. >From my point of view, the only possible problem is that someone can finish using newer protobuf-compiler with older python/java bindings. Both java and python implementations are usable as a runtime without any C++ code, you only need corresponding version of protobuf-compiler for development. > > * For -java subpackage > - About "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6.0" > -- If this means that Java binding needs OpenJDK to > build, then this line must be > -------------------------------------------------------- > BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 > -------------------------------------------------------- > java-devel vitrual Provides by java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel > has Epoch 1 for historical reason (see: Unfortunately I'm not that familiar with java development and packaging. The problem is that if I just add 'BuildRequires: java-devel' the build fails at some point with errors like: ------------------------------------------------------- 1. ERROR in /builddir/build/BUILD/protobuf-2.0.2/java/src/main/java/com/google/p rotobuf/TextFormat.java (at line 438) while (pos < matcher.regionStart()) { ^^^^^^^^^^^ The method regionStart() is undefined for the type Matcher ------------------------------------------------------- On my Fedora 8 system BuildRequires: java-devel brings java-1.5.0-gcj-devel-1.5.0.0-17.fc8.i386 in mock build. I can successfully build the package with java-1.6.0-sun-devel-1.6.0.3-1jpp without mock on my system, and BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.6 brings java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel-1.7.0.0-0.19.b21.snapshot.fc8.i586 which builds the package succesfully. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires ) > > -- If either OpenJDK or icedtea can be used to build, > then "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7" is sufficient > (Note that 1.7 < 1:1.6) I'm not sure if this is a good idea. This requirement in general makes it impossible to build the package with java-1.6.0-sun-devel-1.6.0.3-1jpp, while java-devel >= 1.6 brings correct dependencies in mock and allows to build the package with sun java 1.6 > > * For -javadoc subpackage > - "Requires: %{name}-%{version}-%{release}-java" is perhaps a typo. Fixed. > > * Shipping -static subpackage > - Please explain why this package is needed where -devel > subpackage is provided which includes .so symlink libraries. > Usually static archives must be removed unless > the package does not provide shared libraries. I just think this can be handy, and I generally disagree with the policy of packaging only shared libraries for development. There are some cases when you need static libraries, and for these cases having static libraries packaged saves you from rebuilding the required libraries yourself. I see no problems here, since normally developer will install -devel and not -static subpackage. > B. %prep, %build, %instll, scriptlets stage: > * Timestamps > - When using "cp" or "install" commands, add "-p" option to keep timestamps > on installed files > > - Also this package uses "install-sh" when installing files. In such case > -------------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT CPPROG="cp -p" > -------------------------------------------------------- > is useful to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible. > ('INSTALL="install -p"' option is usually tricks for Makefiles based > on Makefiles generated by more recent Makefiles and not using install-sh) Fixed. > > * Internal libraries > - This package uses "gtest" library to build. > This is already provided as "gtest" rpm on Fedora system-widely so > this package must be patched to use system-wide gtest library. Working on this. Will update the ticket as soon as it is ready. > > * Unneeded /sbin/ldconfig call > - There is no need that -devel subpackage should call /sbin/ldconfig on > post/postun scriptlets. This was a typo. Fixed. > > C. %files entry > * Macros > - Please refer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros > %_prefix/include must be %_includedir. Fixed. > > * For -devel subpackage > -------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/protobuf/ > protobuf-devel-2.0.2-1.fc10.i386 > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/include/google/ > file /usr/include/google is not owned by any package > -------------------------------------------------------- > - Well, it seems that some other packages also install files > under %_includedir/google, however when installing this -devel > subpackage (and its dependency rpms), %_includedir/google > is not owned by any packages. > So for now %_includedir/google must also be owned by > this rpm. Done. > > * For -python subpackage > -------------------------------------------------------- > %files python -f python/INSTALLED_FILES > -------------------------------------------------------- > - This method (i.e. listing %files entry by using INSTALLED_FILES > created by setup.py) is forbidden on Fedora. > With this method directory ownership issue is frequently ignored > (and actually for this case): > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories Fixed. > > !!For -vim subpackage > ! Neither of %_datadir/vim/vimfiles/{ftdetect,syntax} are owned > by any packages, however I will ask vim maintainer about this. > Any news on this item? > * For -java subpackage > - %{_datadir}/maven2/poms, %{_mavendepmapfragdir} are already > owned by jpackage-utils and this package should not own > these directories > (in this point packaging guidelines is a bit wrong). Fixed. So finally, Updated SPEC: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf.spec New SRPM: http://shamardin.googlepages.com/protobuf-2.0.2-2.fc8.src.rpm Changes: * Fri Oct 31 2008 Lev Shamardin - 2.0.2-2 - Use python_sitelib macro instead of INSTALLED_FILES. - Fix the license. - Fix redundant requirement for -devel subpackage. - Fix wrong dependences for -python subpackage. - Fix typo in requirements for -javadoc subpackage. - Use -p option for cp and install to preserve timestamps. - Remove unneeded ldconfig call for post scripts of -devel subpackage. - Fix directories ownership. I will update the SPEC to use the packaged gtest in the next few days, could you please check for any other errors left meanwhile? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:44:56 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311444.m9VEiupf007902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #12 from Levente Farkas 2008-10-31 10:44:55 EDT --- i mean all mingw32 packages. but main question here why do you use this Provides/Obsoletes trick in this packages when don't use in any other packages? currently i'd like to install parallel our old mingw packages and these new ming32 to test and compare them and this's the only place where they conflict. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:48:48 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311448.m9VEmmYe008950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 10:48:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks. If you intend this review to be official, you need to also set the > status from NEW to ASSIGNED, assign it from nobody to your self, and set the > review flag to ?. Then, when approved, set the review flag to + and indicate > your approval. That is the problem. I cannot change the status. NEW is fixed (no pop-up). Also, the fedora-cvs is greyed for me on all pages (I could not change it for parprouted). I can only change the status of pages where someone has done this before, such as the pyglet revision (you changed there first). I read in the guidelines, I would have to wait at least 24hs for my status change, because the sync is done manually once per day. Do you think this is the problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 14:56:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311456.m9VEu3H2010905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 10:56:01 EDT --- I think so, everything else looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:05:57 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454408] Review Request: mingw32-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311505.m9VF5vwm012659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2008-10-31 11:05:56 EDT --- So there's a few things to say about this .. Firstly, it'd be really useful to have you testing the same mingw32-* packages that we are using (and if you find bugs, reporting them as you have been doing). Otherwise we're going to be chasing pseudo-bugs which are caused by us running different version. The provides/obsoletes is needed because we used to ship mingw-* packages, until FPC asked us to change the names. However, it's unlikely that anyone still has those ancient packages installed, so we can probably get rid of those Provides/Obsoletes. I only added it to a few base packages. Also, the HG development repository does allow you to branch so if you want to make local changes it should be relatively easy (but remember point 1 above). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:14:16 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311514.m9VFEGCw013792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 --- Comment #6 from Gerd Hoffmann 2008-10-31 11:14:16 EDT --- New package with updated License: tag uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:16:55 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311516.m9VFGt8X014567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2008-10-31 11:16:54 EDT --- Thanks David! New version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-foolscap-0.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:22:23 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:22:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311522.m9VFMN7o015540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2008-10-31 11:22:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: shed Short Description: simple ncurses based hex editor Owners: maxamillion Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:25:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311525.m9VFPBis016216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 11:25:10 EDT --- Good, but it'd be best to comment on exactly how one may create the modified tarball from upstream, and not have the URL in the tag. i.e. Change: Source0: ftp://ftp.ifor.math.ethz.ch/pub/fukuda/cdd/%{name}-094f.tar.gz to: #Source0: ftp://ftp.ifor.math.ethz.ch/pub/fukuda/cdd/%{name}-094f.tar.gz #tar -xzf cddlib-094f.tar.gz #rm foo #tar -czf cddlib-094f/ cddlib-094f.tar.gz Source0: cddlib-094f.tar.gz This way someone testing md5sum will understand. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:37:17 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311537.m9VFbHwT032137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 11:37:16 EDT --- rpmlint clean, except for some things above that we've come to an understanding, and these: arm4.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libarm4db_bdb.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. arm4.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libarm4db_common.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. arm4.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libarm4db.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 15:57:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311557.m9VFvMEh022053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #11 from David Carter 2008-10-31 11:57:22 EDT --- How'd you get those warnings? rpmlint doesn't show them for me. These calls are made when assertions fail. I can remove them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:04:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458054] Review Request: arm4 - Application Response Measurement (ARM) agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311604.m9VG4QFS023109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 12:04:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > How'd you get those warnings? rpmlint doesn't show them for me. Not sure. I just updated to the very latest F-9 rpmlint, rpmlint-0.85-2.fc9.noarch. > These calls are made when assertions fail. I can remove them. Probably best to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:13:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311613.m9VGDdtB005960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #24 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 12:13:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > I've just received few advices from #blendercoders > I think we shouldn't duplicate code from how python module, and 'try to' > consider yafaray blender dso and python script as usual python modules... > (using python-site-arch directory for arch dependant code). Hi, I updated the spec and the .src.rpm. I also created yafaray-snapshot.sh based on dirac-snapshot. I put the script in the doc section of the package. Regarding your last comment, the problem is that /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafrayinterface.py imports _yafrayinterface.so, via swig: ------------------------------------ # This file was automatically generated by SWIG (http://www.swig.org). # Version 1.3.33 # # Don't modify this file, modify the SWIG interface instead. # This file is compatible with both classic and new-style classes. import _yafrayinterface ------------------------------------ The only way (I see) for not having _yafrayinterface.so in the same directory of the script (/usr/share/blender/scripts) is to use: import sys sys.path.append ("/usr/lib64/blender/plugins/yafaray") import _yafrayinterface or whatever location we put the shared library. Therefore, I will have to patch the script ... (but it works). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:23:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:23:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459088] Review Request: protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311623.m9VGNZ1W007913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459088 --- Comment #24 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2008-10-31 12:23:33 EDT --- > > > > * Shipping -static subpackage > > - Please explain why this package is needed where -devel > > subpackage is provided which includes .so symlink libraries. > > Usually static archives must be removed unless > > the package does not provide shared libraries. > > I just think this can be handy, and I generally disagree with the > policy of packaging only shared libraries for development. There are > some cases when you need static libraries, and for these cases having > static libraries packaged saves you from rebuilding the required > libraries yourself. I see no problems here, since normally developer > will install -devel and not -static subpackage. I would second that. They're particularly useful for libraries that are likely to be used in embedded environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462535] Review Request: python-foolscap - Next-generation RPC protocol, intended to replace Perspective Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311621.m9VGLwFl007743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462535 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 12:21:57 EDT --- Must: BuildRequires: python See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Files is python_sitelib are not in a module subdirectory, and should be. David, I'd also like to see a more detailed review. Early in learning the review process, many find it helpful to use a template. What I do is paste a copy of the ReviewGuidelines into the bug, and go through it section by section, annotating each with either OK or FIX, and summarizing at the end. This helps prevent omissions, and I speak from experience here. :) Other than that and the above, I concur with your review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:44:42 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311644.m9VGigXw014996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Posdzich 2008-10-31 12:44:41 EDT --- Fixed the URL Spec: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/barrage-1.0.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:55:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311655.m9VGtEfS004362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jonstanley at gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 12:55:13 EDT --- Please remember to assign to the reviewer. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:59:00 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447847] Review Request: unbound - Validating, recursive, and caching DNS(SEC) resolver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311659.m9VGx0BV005848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447847 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 12:58:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 16:57:59 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311657.m9VGvxQt005413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kevin at tummy.com --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 12:57:58 EDT --- The Review Request title here has "g2ipmsg2" is that a typo and it should be "g2ipmsg" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:02:22 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230935] Review Request: aircrack-ng - 802.11 (wireless) sniffer and WEP/WPA-PSK key cracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311702.m9VH2Mjc023529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230935 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 13:02:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:01:10 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311701.m9VH1AqO022635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 13:01:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:00:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467798] Review Request: dnsperf - Benchmarking authorative and recursing DNS servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311700.m9VH035p022102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467798 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2008-10-31 13:00:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:12:33 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445970] Review Request: g2ipmsg - IP Messenger for GNOME 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311712.m9VHCXM1025097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445970 ZC Miao changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: g2ipmsg2 - |Review Request: g2ipmsg - |IP Messenger for GNOME 2 |IP Messenger for GNOME 2 --- Comment #11 from ZC Miao 2008-10-31 13:12:31 EDT --- Oops, the title should be a typo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:27:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311727.m9VHRImp012229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 13:27:18 EDT --- Hi, Jon I realized that I am watching the Review Requests with my bugzilla account. How do I use my FAS2 account instead? I set a different email for FAS2. Should I change the email of my bugzilla account to match the one from my FAS2 account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:46:11 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311746.m9VHkBem031694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 13:46:10 EDT --- Probably. I use the same one for both, and use my FAS2 account to get in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 17:56:35 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311756.m9VHuZfE001077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2008-10-31 13:56:34 EDT --- Or even rename the tarball to cddlib-094f-free.tar.gz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:05:26 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:05:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311805.m9VI5Q28019589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |promac at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:03:14 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311803.m9VI3EoN018940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 14:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > Or even rename the tarball to cddlib-094f-free.tar.gz. Which would go even farther in clarifying the issue. Good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:04:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311804.m9VI43K2019006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |promac at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 14:04:02 EDT --- Finally, done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:09:13 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452108] Review Request: cfdg-fe - A frontend for cfdg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311809.m9VI9DpW003222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452108 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2008-10-31 14:09:13 EDT --- Thanks very much! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cfdg-fe Short Description: A frontend for cfdg Owners: limb Branches: F-9 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:12:18 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:12:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467180] Review Request: pngnq - tool for quantizing PNG images in RGBA format Version In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311812.m9VICI5I020603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467180 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-31 14:12:17 EDT --- * Make use of the %{version} macro for future convenience, e.g. %setup -q -n %{version} * Any information about the patches? * In your SPEC file notation I think it would be better to use %{optflags} instead of ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} . * Please provide the links to the new SPEC and SRPM on every update, so things don't get mixed up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:12:45 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461929] Review Request: mnemosyne - Flash-card learning tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311812.m9VICjBM003901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461929 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2008-10-31 14:12:43 EDT --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=913629 You are building a noarch python package. Using CFLAGS is irrelevant. (it is replaced as -O2 only as noarch package). In the install section, why do you need to install twice ? %{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} should be enought. (at least there is the same set of files with this method). Gnome HIG recommends to use verb(s) in comments for desktop files... http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gup/hig/1.0/ About r1, it is annoying. But I think you have handled it right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:17:20 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467854] Review Request: parprouted - Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311817.m9VIHKhr021390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467854 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2008-10-31 14:17:19 EDT --- Thanks, Jon here it is the updated URL (either one is good). SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/parprouted-0.70-3.fc8.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/parprouted-0.70-3.fc8.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: parprouted Short Description: Proxy ARP IP bridging daemon Owners: roma Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:23:25 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:23:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311823.m9VINPOT005625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |promac at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |promac at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 18:24:15 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468554] Review Request: barrage - Kill and destroy as many targets as possible within 3 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311824.m9VIOF9E005744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468554 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2008-10-31 14:24:14 EDT --- Template from: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. + OK rpmlint is silence - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. + OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. + OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. + OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. If the reviewer is unable to read the spec file, it will be impossible to perform a review. Fedora is not the place for entries into the Obfuscated Code Contest (http://www.ioccc.org/). + OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + OK No md5sum information on upstream?s homepage 5dbecef907eb27215e8cc047eae2ee90 (cheekyboinc download) 5dbecef907eb27215e8cc047eae2ee90 (cassmodiah download) 5dbecef907eb27215e8cc047eae2ee90 (Source0 in srpm) - MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. + OK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=913483 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the long explanation with the bug number. The bug should be marked as blocking one (or more) of the following bugs to simplify tracking such issues: FE-ExcludeArch-x86 , FE-ExcludeArch-x64 , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc , FE-ExcludeArch-ppc64 / N/A - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. + OK - MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. / N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. If the package has multiple subpackages with libraries, each subpackage should also have a %post/%postun section that calls /sbin/ldconfig. An example of the correct syntax for this is: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig / N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. / N/A - MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. + OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. + OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). + OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines . + OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) / N/A - MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. + OK - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). / N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. / N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} / N/A - MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. / N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines . If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. + OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. + OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. + OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. + OK last but not least: +----------------------+ | | | BARRAGE APPROVED | | | +----------------------+ Thank you all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 19:03:31 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225897] Merge Review: ImageMagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810311903.m9VJ3VlC029959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225897 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-31 15:03:30 EDT --- I successfully built ImageMagick (6.4.0.10) with --enable-static=no \ --with-modules=no \ and tried "convert", "display", "identify". They worked flawlessly for all the cases I tried (The package I built was free of .la files.). Please confirm this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 20:22:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312022.m9VKMdkw027493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 16:22:38 EDT --- shed-1.13-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shed-1.13-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 20:27:30 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464074] Review Request: cddlib - A library for generating all vertices in convex polyhedrons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312027.m9VKRUcq012547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #28 from Conrad Meyer 2008-10-31 16:27:29 EDT --- Ok. Thanks for the feedback. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/cddlib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/cddlib-094f-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 20:39:41 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467179] Review Request: pngcrush - Optimizer for PNG (Portable Network Graphics) files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312039.m9VKdf3J014202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467179 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2008-10-31 16:39:40 EDT --- Sorry to be paranoid about the license, but reviewers are supposed to be paranoid, aren't they? :-) Speaking of paranoia, would you mind also removing crc32.h, deflate.h, inf*.h, and trees.h before compiling? It probably doesn't matter, but it will give me warm fuzzies. Also, it doesn't appear necessary to link with -lm, since that gets pulled in by libpng. And Patch0 is now unnecessary since you aren't using make any more. Did you consider making Changelog.txt a %doc file? Finally, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL the source URL should refer to downloads.sourceforge.net. MUST items: - rpmlint output: pngcrush.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - package name: OK - spec file name: OK - Packaging Guidelines: OK, except for the source URL and Patch0 - approved license: OK - license field: OK - license file: OK - spec in American English: OK - legible spec: OK - package sources match upstream: OK - successful compile on one arch: OK - ExcludeArch: OK - BuildRequires: OK - locales: OK - library files: OK - relocatable: OK - own all directories: OK - no duplicates files: OK - file permissions: OK - %clean section: OK - consistent use of macros: OK - code or permissible content: OK - large documentation files: OK - no runtime files in %doc: OK - header files: OK - static libraries: OK - pkgconfig files: OK - library files with no suffix in devel: OK - devel package Requires: OK - no libtool archives: OK - desktop files: OK - do not own files/dirs owned by other packages: OK - clean at start of %install: OK - filenames are UTF-8: OK SHOULD items: - query upstream for a license file: have you done this? - description and summary translations: OK - builds in mock: OK - builds into packages on all supported arches: did not check - package functions as described: OK with light testing - sane scriptlets: OK - subpackages require main package: OK - pkgconfig files in devel: OK - file dependencies: OK I believe the source URL must be changed, because it is referred to from the Packaging Guidelines, and so falls under a MUST item. The unnecessary Patch0 also falls afoul of the Packaging Guidelines, I believe, due to the section entitled "All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment". Just remove it. Please also consider the following (but I won't block approval for these): - Also remove crc32.h, deflate.h, inf*.h, and trees.h before compiling - Drop "-lm" from the link line - Make Changelog.txt a %doc file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 21:21:58 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:21:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312121.m9VLLwUr020851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 17:21:57 EDT --- fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fedora-business-cards-0.2.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 21:22:53 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469280] Review Request: fedora-business-cards - A tool for rendering Fedora contributor business cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312122.m9VLMr8U004651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469280 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 21:59:49 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:59:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 361701] Package review: konserve - System tray application that performs periodic backups In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312159.m9VLxnFj009589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=361701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |orcanbahri at yahoo.com --- Comment #15 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2008-10-31 17:59:47 EDT --- This package needs some more work. Here are my notes: * The license should be GPLv2+ and GFDL. The file doc/konserve/index.docbook claims GFDL license for the documentation of the software. But I can't find the text of GFDL inside the tarball. Can you contact upstream to ask for including the text of GFDL in the tarball? * The files AUTHORS, COPYING and ChangeLog must be in %doc * Can you name the patches konserve-xxx.patch ? Also an explanation in the SPEC file about what each of them does would be nice. The patches should also be submitted upstream (unless they are very Fedora specific) and the links from their bug tracking system should be put in the SPEC file. * I don't think you need BR: libtool * Fedora specific compilation flags are getting overridden. This needs fixed. * --vendor="fedora" should be removed from new packages according to the new guidelines. * You are already patching the desktop file. Why are you using an --add-category="System" in the desktop-file-install and not do this in the patch? * Please follow the guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GTK.2B_icon_cache for installation of icons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 22:12:39 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312212.m9VMCdMI011767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 --- Comment #3 from Colin Walters 2008-10-31 18:12:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Owen. This should address the issues: http://cdn.verbum.org/gobject-introspection-0.6.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 22:16:07 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:16:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468285] Review Request: gobject-introspection In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312216.m9VMG7cv028939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468285 --- Comment #4 from Colin Walters 2008-10-31 18:16:06 EDT --- (Except for the license bit, tracking that down upstream now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 22:19:03 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468453] Review Request: shed - simple ncurses based hex editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200810312219.m9VMJ3Uu012866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468453 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(maxamillion at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2008-10-31 18:19:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > [!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > > License type: GPLv2 [1] > > [1] License is GPLv2+. Take a look at the headers of the source: "or (at your > option) any later version" > > > If the license tag is fixed, I see no further blocker, package APPROVED The license tag was not fixed before cvs import, it's still GPLv2. You have to fix this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Oct 31 23:59:32 2008 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] New: review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 Summary: review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: walters at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, otaylor at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Colin Walters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Spec: http://cdn.verbum.org/gir-repository.spec SRPM: http://cdn.verbum.org/gir-repository-0.6.0-1.svn20081031.r190.fc10.src.rpm Note there are rpmlint errors of the form: gir-repository.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libgirepo-Clutter-custom.so libgirepo-Clutter-custom.so These should be safely ignorable because these custom libraries are not linked to directly; they will be dlopen()ed by the introspection system. They are also a temporary hack (like all of gir-repository) until we get the changes upstreamed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.