[Bug 464424] Review Request: GROMACS - a Molecular Dynamics package
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Oct 3 11:39:20 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464424
--- Comment #27 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> 2008-10-03 07:39:18 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Some notes:
>
> * EVR
> - At least EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) needs fixing:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
Fixed.
> * configure
> - Doesn't the following work?
Duh, much simpler. Thanks.
> * Namespace in %_bindir, generic names
> - Your srpm installs many exectables under %_bindir, which is not desired.
> Also some files has too generic names (like luck, wheel, highway, and so
> on),
> which is rather a blocker.
> Please move (almost all) executables under %_bindir to %_libexecdir/%name,
> for
> example and add executables under %_bindir which are _really_ needed.
The problem is that GROMACS has a big bunch of independent analysis tools that
users need, all of which must be in the system path.
I renamed highway, luck, sigeps and wheel to g_highway, g_luck, g_sigeps and
g_wheel. I used autoreconf to regenerate the scripts.
I don't have access to the buildsystem yet, so I can't check whether it works
on F10.
> * Duplicate files
Thanks, fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list