[Bug 462982] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462982


Bruno Cornec <bruno_cornec at hp.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bruno_cornec at hp.com




--- Comment #12 from Bruno Cornec <bruno_cornec at hp.com>  2008-10-03 08:14:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> In order to make tracking easier for everyone, please bump the release tag each
> time you modify the spec file (and _add_ a corresponding changelog entry, not
> _replace_ the previous one as you have done). For instance
> 

Ok, the next one is -3 now so.

>  %changelog
> * Thu Oct 02 2008 Bruno Cornec <bruno at project-builder.org> 1.19-2.fc9
> - fix compilation flags
> 
> * Sat Sep 20 2008 Bruno Cornec <bruno at project-builder.org> 1.19-1.fc9
> - Updated to 1.19

Ok. Will try to do that properly for -3 tag.
In fact I have a fake changelog I generate for test packages, and a real one
for  official packages. Now we are approaching that step, it makes sense.

> as of 02.oct.2008, ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec still
> has the missing "s" in  Summary(fr).

My mistake, I wasn't looking at the right line.


For my own knowledge what is the tool you're using for conformity checking. I
just know rpmlint. What else exists ?

> 
> I will take a look at your other packages and if satisfied I will sponsor you.

Thanks.

So new versions available at:
 ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer.spec
and ftp://ftp.mondorescue.org/test/fedora/9/buffer-1.19-3.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.