[Bug 465382] Review Request: bouncycastle-mail - Additional libraries for Bouncy Castle
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Oct 5 15:23:16 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465382
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-10-05 11:23:14 EDT ---
For 1.41-1
* Summary/Description
- Would you change Summary/Description more informative?
I don't think the Summary "Additional libraries" makes
much sense.
* Naming
- First of all, why is this srpm named as "bouncycastle-mail",
not "bcmail"?
* License
- License tag should be "MIT"
* SourceURL
- SOURCE0 must be written with full URL:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
* (Build)Requires
- I guess "BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1.7" is better than
java-1.7.0-icedtea-devel.
* unpackaging source / removing precompiled binaries
- Please unpack all sources in the tarball before removing
precompiled binaries to make it sure that all precompiled
binaries (including those in zip files if any) are
correctly removed.
! By the way when using "unzip" adding "-qq" option is
preferred. When using zip source tarball %setup -q
uses this.
* absolute symlink
-----------------------------------------------------
W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/gcj-endorsed/bcmail-1.41.jar
/usr/share/java/bcmail-1.41.jar
-----------------------------------------------------
- Mainly for chroot reason and so on, Fedora requests that all
symlinks should be relative, not absolute.
! %postun
-----------------------------------------------------
%postun
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
if [ -x %{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db ]; then
%{_bindir}/rebuild-gcj-db
fi
fi
-----------------------------------------------------
- While I am not familiar with gcj, would you explain why
it is sufficient that these scripts are called only when
[ $1 -eq 0 ] ? (please also refer to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines )
* %attr
- Although GCJGuidelines uses it, the part "%attr(-,root,root)"
is completely redundant.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list