[Bug 457035] Review Request: libproxy - A library handling all the details of proxy configuration

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457035





--- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com>  2008-10-27 13:58:05 EDT ---
@Nathaniel
Indeed, I would say even that: your advices are not only welcomed, but they are
really needed to define with you an sharp way to package libproxy. So this is
an exchange in two ways And without your advices, there is low chance that the
package will be provided within fedora.
Also, I hope that this talk doesn't only serve Fedora. I've for example
requested the OpenSUSE packager for advices, and I know he's following.

So according to the quick advices received from the kde team. It is better to
link directly to libproxy library. So I guess to use this spec solely. Now I
just wonder if libproxy will be useable as is , since it will lack the related
modules from within libproxy along with lack of support from the related
components (control-center, neon, NetworkManager, xulrunner,yum , pirut etc),
At least for our configuration tools in F-10.

So for the long plan. I expect there is a need for a feature request to have
most "internet application" to be converted/tested to libproxy
support/compliance.

Spec URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libproxy.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libproxy-0.2.3-7.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.