[Bug 461077] Review Request: nxtvepg - A nexTView EPG decoder and browser

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Oct 30 20:05:10 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461077


Torsten Rausche <trausche at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(trausche at fedorapr |
                   |oject.org)                  |




--- Comment #16 from Torsten Rausche <trausche at fedoraproject.org>  2008-10-30 16:05:09 EDT ---
I did a new release in the meantime. You see I maintain the package -- as I
actively use it. I just have a problem with the time I have to spend with
reviewing other packages. There is an enormous list of points to check for
which i needed hours for my own package. How much time will it cost then to do
the same with a foreign package? Are there any helpful tools I missed? Do I
have to check every single point in that pre-reviews to get them honored? How
many pre-reviews will I have to do?

I submitted this package because I created it for myself anyway and thought it
could be useful for other people too. I am not doing it to polish my ego by
getting an elite Fedora packager at any cost. Therefore I will only invest as
much time in this process as is pleasing to me.

---------------------------------------------------------

Spec URL: http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.torsten.rausche.net/fedora/review/nxtvepg/nxtvepg-2.8.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

%changelog
* Sat Oct 11 2008 Torsten Rausche <trausche at fedoraproject.org> - 2.8.1-1
- New bugfix release
- Include the (experimental) Teletext grabber
- Require Perl for the Teletext grabber

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list