[Bug 460786] Review Request: mediawiki-Cite - An extension to provide Citation tools for Mediawiki
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Sep 28 00:17:22 UTC 2008
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460786
Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Ian Weller <ianweller at gmail.com> 2008-09-27 20:17:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Per IRC, tar/bzip produce different md5sums for each creation (on my system at
> least), the files do have the same md5sum
Noted. Call it good.
> > x specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
> > - s/$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{buildroot}
> > - Might be a good idea to change the svnrev to without an r and use it in the
> > comment that tells us how you created the tarball.
> It's created just like any other, as for $ vs %{} is really just cosmetic,
> something I can fix upon import.
Noted. I was blocking on other issues.
> > x dist tag is present.
> > - Add %{?dist} to the end of the Release
> Not a must -
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Do_I_Have_To_Use_the_Dist_Tag.3F
I don't understand the reasoning behind this, but sure. It's guidelines! ;)
> > x license text included in package.
> > - Fetch a copy of the GPLv2 in text form and shove it in %doc.
> This is NOT a must/appropriate solution -
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
Yeah, I forgot. Call it good.
== APPROVED ==
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list